28.12.2014 Views

View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Samples T49-T108<br />

Samples T49-T108 were secured as multiple <strong>in</strong>dividual samples per stage per site.<br />

(Stage <strong>in</strong> this context refers to <strong>the</strong> category of sampl<strong>in</strong>g location.) In addition to <strong>the</strong><br />

upstream pond stage, samples were collected <strong>in</strong> contributary flow concentrations adjacent<br />

to <strong>the</strong> upstream retention area to fur<strong>the</strong>r explore overall efficiencies associated with <strong>the</strong><br />

study <strong>in</strong>stallations. In order to differentiate samples collected <strong>in</strong> this manner, upstream<br />

contributary samples are designated with an upstream c descriptor, and samples collected<br />

from upstream ponds are designated with an upstream p descriptor <strong>in</strong> data and results<br />

tables.<br />

Samples T49-T72 were collected similarly at Site 6. Multiple, <strong>in</strong>dividual samples<br />

were collected <strong>for</strong> each stage: upstream flow concentrations, upstream pond locations,<br />

and downstream locations. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>re were m<strong>in</strong>or unfiltered flows from sources exterior<br />

to <strong>the</strong> system, downstream samples were ga<strong>the</strong>red at <strong>the</strong> filter face. Sample groups T49-<br />

T60 (see Figure A10 <strong>in</strong> Appendix A) and T60-T72 (see Figure A11 <strong>in</strong> Appendix A) were<br />

collected from <strong>the</strong> same event at a time differential of approximately 1.5 hours so that<br />

changes result<strong>in</strong>g over time could be identified.<br />

Samples T72-T84 (see Figure A12 <strong>in</strong> Appendix A) were collected at Site 3<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> methodology described <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> group. The majority of downstream<br />

samples were collected along <strong>the</strong> face of <strong>the</strong> fence, although a s<strong>in</strong>gle sample was<br />

collected <strong>in</strong> a small flow concentration.<br />

Samples T85-T96 (see Figure A13 <strong>in</strong> Appendix A) were collected <strong>in</strong> a similar<br />

fashion at Site 6. Unfiltered flows from external sources at <strong>the</strong> downstream stage were<br />

observed, and attempts to select and sample isolated <strong>in</strong>-stream locations were per<strong>for</strong>med.<br />

Additional downstream samples were collected at <strong>the</strong> face of <strong>the</strong> fence. Over-topp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g from large retention volumes precluded ord<strong>in</strong>ary downstream sampl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> set<br />

T97-T108 (see Figure A14 <strong>in</strong> Appendix A). In this case, samples were ga<strong>the</strong>red from<br />

flows downstream <strong>in</strong> relation to a recently <strong>in</strong>stalled rock berm. Any samples attributed<br />

strictly to <strong>the</strong> operation of a rock berm are differentiated by <strong>the</strong> bold<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> sample<br />

descriptor <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> data and results tables.<br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!