View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...
View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...
View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
w<br />
A S<br />
h 1<br />
Silt Fence<br />
Figure 5.4 Volumetric Changes <strong>in</strong> Runoff Trapped Upstream of Silt Fence<br />
runoff is equal to h 1 . The head downstream of <strong>the</strong> silt fence is assumed to be zero.<br />
There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> change <strong>in</strong> head across <strong>the</strong> fabric is equal to h 1 . At a later time, t 2 , <strong>the</strong> level<br />
of <strong>the</strong> runoff is h 2 . The volume of runoff pass<strong>in</strong>g through <strong>the</strong> geotextile <strong>in</strong> this time<br />
<strong>in</strong>terval is ∆V.<br />
∆V = (h 1 -h 2 )A S<br />
These volumes were used to calculate a detention time, effluent suspended solids<br />
load, and TSS removal efficiency <strong>for</strong> each test. These calculations are provided <strong>in</strong><br />
Appendix D. The flow-through rate, q, dur<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong>terval is <strong>the</strong> volume divided by <strong>the</strong><br />
time <strong>in</strong>terval and submerged area of fabric (width of fabric times average level dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>terval).<br />
q= V/[(t - t )( h 1 +h 2<br />
∆<br />
2 1<br />
)w]<br />
2<br />
Flow rates observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> flume tests are approximately two orders of magnitude<br />
less than <strong>the</strong> values stated by <strong>the</strong> manufacturers (Table 5.5). Recommended flow rates of<br />
0.2 L/s . m 2 (Wyant, 1981) appear to reflect actual per<strong>for</strong>mance better than many used <strong>in</strong><br />
current practice, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> TxDOT (1992) recommendation of 27 L/s . m 2 . Much of<br />
43