28.12.2014 Views

View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Many of <strong>the</strong> tests ended after 48 hours; however, <strong>in</strong> some cases <strong>the</strong> runoff had not<br />

completely dra<strong>in</strong>ed through <strong>the</strong> silt fence fabrics. The relationship of <strong>the</strong> runoff level<br />

with respect to time <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> last 24 hours of <strong>the</strong> test can be approximated by a l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

function. The time <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> flume to dra<strong>in</strong> completely was estimated by extrapolat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

l<strong>in</strong>early from <strong>the</strong> last few data po<strong>in</strong>ts. A typical test where runoff rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> flume<br />

even after 48 hours and <strong>the</strong> estimated time of complete dra<strong>in</strong>age is presented <strong>in</strong> Figure<br />

5.5.<br />

L<br />

0.40<br />

0.35<br />

0.30<br />

0.25<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

0.05<br />

0.00<br />

Fill<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Dra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

0 1440 2880 4320 5760 7200 8640<br />

Time, m<strong>in</strong><br />

Observed<br />

Estimated<br />

Figure 5.5 Observed Levels Dur<strong>in</strong>g a Flume Test and <strong>the</strong> Extrapolated Time <strong>for</strong><br />

Complete Dra<strong>in</strong>age<br />

5.1.8 TSS Removal Efficiency<br />

The observed TSS removal efficiency range, mean, median, and standard<br />

deviation <strong>for</strong> each silt fence are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 5.6. Individual test results are given <strong>in</strong><br />

Appendix D. Removal efficiencies were based on <strong>in</strong>fluent and effluent suspended solids<br />

mass loads. Calculations of <strong>the</strong>se removal efficiencies also are provided <strong>in</strong> Appendix D.<br />

The highest removal efficiencies were observed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> non-woven Mirafi fabric.<br />

This fabric also had <strong>the</strong> lowest flow rates of <strong>the</strong> fabrics tested. Increased detention time<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> suspended solids beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> silt fence lead to <strong>in</strong>creased removal efficiency.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!