View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

T85 T86 T87 T92 W W W W W T95 T96 T91 W W W T94 T88 T89 W W W W T93 LEGEND: <strong>Water</strong> Boundary -W- Woven Fabric Silt Fence -NW- Non-woven Fabric Silt Fence T18 Sample Indentification T90 Figure A13 Sample Locations T85-T96(Site 6) 80
N T105 T106 T107 T108 T97 T98 T101 T102 W W W W T103 T99 T104 T100 W W W W LEGEND: -W- -NW- T18 <strong>Water</strong> Boundary Woven Fabric Silt Fence Non-woven Fabric Silt Fence Sample Indentification Figure A14 Sample Locations T97-T108 (Site 6) 81
Page 1:
CRWR Online Report 95-6 AN EVALUATI
Page 5:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was s
Page 8 and 9:
4.2.3 TSS Reduction Efficiency of S
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 2.1
Page 13 and 14:
and reduce construction duration (G
Page 15 and 16:
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Introducti
Page 17 and 18:
are characterized by lower permeabi
Page 19 and 20:
size and is the estimated largest p
Page 21 and 22:
corrected to a viscosity at 20 o C
Page 23 and 24:
Influent samples from each of the t
Page 25 and 26:
emaining 10% ranged from 15 to 50
Page 27 and 28:
Much less research has been directe
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 3.1 Location of Inventoried
Page 31 and 32:
Table 3.2 Costs of Temporary Contro
Page 33 and 34:
The inventory data indicate that si
Page 35 and 36:
nature of construction activities r
Page 37 and 38: the discharge was 1542 mg/L, with a
Page 39 and 40: emained in suspension and were able
Page 41 and 42: Effluent Sampling Location Rock Ber
Page 43 and 44: 5. LABORATORY TESTS OF SILT FENCES
Page 45 and 46: along with runoff from the flume. T
Page 47 and 48: Table 5.3 Grain sizes, Gradation, R
Page 49 and 50: phenomenon is similar to sediment-l
Page 51 and 52: w A S h 1 Silt Fence Figure 5.4 Vol
Page 53 and 54: Many of the tests ended after 48 ho
Page 55 and 56: observation demonstrates that field
Page 57 and 58: The permeameter initially was set u
Page 59 and 60: Flow per Area, cm/s 40 30 20 10 0 y
Page 61 and 62: 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 63 and 64: topping. Knowledge of the performan
Page 65 and 66: Das, B. M., 1985, “Principles of
Page 67: Soil Conservation Service (SCS), 19
Page 71 and 72: Sample Descriptions Samples T1-T30
Page 73 and 74: Samples T109-T122 Although samples
Page 75 and 76: individual analyses of samples T1-T
Page 77 and 78: 2 6 7 4 1 Fort McGrude Bannister Ln
Page 79 and 80: N T6 W W W W W W W W W W W T7 T5 T8
Page 81 and 82: LEGEND: -W- -NW- T18 Water Boundary
Page 83 and 84: T34 T38 NW NW NW NW T39 NW NW NW NW
Page 85 and 86: T49 T50 T53 T54 T58 W T55 W W W W T
Page 87: T75 W W W LEGEND: -W- -NW- T18 Wate
Page 91 and 92: T117 N LEGEND: T118 -W- -NW- T18 Wa
Page 93: APPENDIX B - RESULTS OF SAMPLE ANAL
Page 96 and 97: SAMPLE DATE TIME DESCRIPTOR SITE TS
Page 98 and 99: T64 4/7/93 10:55AM UPSTREAM C 6 NIA
Page 100 and 101: Table B2. Results of Particle Size
Page 102 and 103: Table B4. Silt Fence Turbidity Redu
Page 105 and 106: Total Suspended Solids The analysis
Page 107 and 108: APPENDIX D - CATALOG OF FLUME TESTS
Page 109 and 110: Test number: 1 Influent Samples : D
Page 119 and 120: Test number: 11 Influent Samples :
Page 139 and 140:
132
Page 141 and 142:
Amoco woven d = #20 sieve d = 8.50E
Page 143 and 144:
70 60 Flow per Area, cm/s 50 40 30
Page 145 and 146:
APPENDIX F - BASE EFFICIENCY TEST 1
Page 147 and 148:
Date = 9/17/94 Influent Samples: St
show all

View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?