- Page 1: CRWR Online Report 95-6 AN EVALUATI
- Page 7 and 8: TABLE OF CONTENTS PUBLICATION NOTE
- Page 9: LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title Page 3
- Page 12 and 13: 1. INTRODUCTION The mitigation of p
- Page 14 and 15: development stages and guidelines f
- Page 16 and 17: Filtration of suspended particles b
- Page 18 and 19: are installed to reduce velocities
- Page 20 and 21: are often manufactured with a gloss
- Page 22 and 23: soil. The Virginia Test Method was
- Page 24 and 25: Horner et al. (1990) conducted a tw
- Page 26 and 27: Weber and Wilson (1976) monitored t
- Page 28 and 29: 3. INVENTORY OF TEMPORARY CONTROL D
- Page 30 and 31: The cost for each installation was
- Page 32 and 33: Sed. Ponds ECB's Silt Fences Rock B
- Page 34 and 35: 4. FIELD MONITORING OF TEMPORARY CO
- Page 36 and 37: 4.2.2 Sample Analyses included: The
- Page 38 and 39: the settling velocity would be 0.08
- Page 40 and 41: end of a silt fence was observed at
- Page 42 and 43: TSS Concentration, mg/L 900 800 700
- Page 44 and 45: Bulk Water Supply Slurry Tank Silt
- Page 46 and 47: weight of soil to be mixed with wat
- Page 48 and 49: ecording flow meter. Grab samples o
- Page 50 and 51: which is the most common type of be
- Page 52 and 53: the difference between measured and
- Page 54 and 55:
Conversely, the woven Amoco fabric
- Page 56 and 57:
fabrics that were run without a maj
- Page 58 and 59:
Two tests were run for each of thre
- Page 60 and 61:
these two values. The flow through
- Page 62 and 63:
concentrated flow which promoted er
- Page 64 and 65:
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY American Public Hea
- Page 66 and 67:
Kouwen, N., 1990, “Silt Fences to
- Page 69:
APPENDIX A - Sample Descriptions an
- Page 72 and 73:
Samples T49-T108 Samples T49-T108 w
- Page 74 and 75:
Table A1. Source of Samples T15-T10
- Page 76 and 77:
Figure A1 Construction Project Loca
- Page 78 and 79:
LEGEND: -W- -NW- T18 Water Boundary
- Page 80 and 81:
W W W W LEGEND: -W- -NW- T18 Water
- Page 82 and 83:
LEGEND: -W- -NW- T18 Water Boundary
- Page 84 and 85:
N T43 T44 T46 T48 T45 T47 LEGEND: -
- Page 86 and 87:
T61 T62 T63 T69 W T68 W W W W T72 W
- Page 88 and 89:
T85 T86 T87 T92 W W W W W T95 T96 T
- Page 90 and 91:
N T112 T110 W W W W W W W W W W W L
- Page 92 and 93:
T122 N LEGEND: -W- -NW- T18 Water B
- Page 95 and 96:
Table B1. Individual Sample Analyse
- Page 97 and 98:
M T72 4/7/93 11:05A M T73 4/7/93 11
- Page 99 and 100:
T101 4/29/93 6:14AM UPSTREAM P 6 NI
- Page 101 and 102:
Table B3. Silt Fence TSS Reductions
- Page 103:
APPENDIX C - LABORATORY PROCEDURES
- Page 106 and 107:
A Hach Model 2100A Turbidimeter was
- Page 108 and 109:
100
- Page 110 and 111:
Test number: 2 Influent Samples : D
- Page 112 and 113:
Test number: 4 Influent Samples : D
- Page 114 and 115:
Test number: 6 Influent Samples : D
- Page 116 and 117:
Test number: 8 Influent Samples : D
- Page 118 and 119:
Test number: 10 Influent Samples :
- Page 120 and 121:
Test number: 12 Influent Samples :
- Page 122 and 123:
Test number: 14 Influent Samples :
- Page 124 and 125:
Test number: 16 Influent Samples :
- Page 126 and 127:
Test number: 18 Influent Samples :
- Page 128 and 129:
Test number: 20 Influent Samples :
- Page 130 and 131:
Test number: 22 Influent Samples :
- Page 132 and 133:
Test number: 24 Influent Samples :
- Page 134 and 135:
Test number: 26 Influent Samples :
- Page 136 and 137:
Test number: 28 Influent Samples :
- Page 138 and 139:
APPENDIX E - RESULTS OF PERMEAMETER
- Page 140 and 141:
Fabric area = 5.07 cm 2 Standard Vo
- Page 142 and 143:
70 Flow per Area, cm/s 60 50 40 30
- Page 144 and 145:
70 Flow per Area, cm/s 60 50 40 30
- Page 146 and 147:
140
- Page 148:
142