28.12.2014 Views

View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 5.3 Gra<strong>in</strong> sizes, Gradation, Reynolds Number, and Settl<strong>in</strong>g Velocities of<br />

Simulated Runoff Particles<br />

The slurry flow rate <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> mix<strong>in</strong>g tank was considered to be constant over <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>fill<strong>in</strong>g portion of <strong>the</strong> test, even though dra<strong>in</strong>age was by gravity. The average slurry flow<br />

rate typically was 0.08 L/s and <strong>the</strong> bulk flow rates ranged from 1.6 to 4.4 L/s. Any<br />

variations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> slurry flow rate were negligible compared to <strong>the</strong> sum of <strong>the</strong> bulk water<br />

and slurry flow rates.<br />

Approximately 190 L (50 gal) of <strong>the</strong> slurry were constantly mixed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> slurry<br />

tank and dra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> rapid mix<strong>in</strong>g tank dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g portion of each test. The<br />

suspended soils slurry and bulk water were mixed with a rotary paddle. The runoff<br />

flowed through a baffle wall <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> flume and down to <strong>the</strong> sediment control.<br />

5.1.3 Sampl<strong>in</strong>g and Monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Particle<br />

Diameter,<br />

mm<br />

Percent<br />

Smaller by<br />

Weight<br />

Reynolds<br />

Number<br />

Settl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Velocity,<br />

mm/s<br />

2000 100 41250 309<br />

700 99 8541 183<br />

360 93 3150 131<br />

Newtonian Settl<strong>in</strong>g Ends 250 84 1823 109<br />

Transition Beg<strong>in</strong>s 125 72 600 101<br />

75 64 230 59<br />

55 58 124 40<br />

39 56 65 29<br />

29 52 34 21<br />

20 50 16 15<br />

15 48 8 10<br />

11 44 4 5.4<br />

7.9 41 2 4.0<br />

Transition Ends 5.7 37 1 2.3<br />

Stokes Settl<strong>in</strong>g Beg<strong>in</strong>s 4.1 34 0.27 0.98<br />

3.0 30 0.10 0.51<br />

2.1 26 0.038 0.27<br />

1.3 21 0.0079 0.09<br />

0.9 20 0.0029 0.05<br />

The result<strong>in</strong>g pool of runoff dra<strong>in</strong>ed through <strong>the</strong> sediment control and <strong>the</strong> water<br />

level <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> flume upstream of <strong>the</strong> sediment controls was monitored with an ISCO<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!