View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table A1. Source of Samples T15-T108 Composite Sample Number: TC1 TC2 TC3 TC4 TC5 TC6 TC7 TC8 TC9 TC10 TC11 TC12 TC13 TC14 TC15 TC16 TC18 TC19 TC20 TC21 TC22 TC23 TC24 Individual Samples Combined: T15,T17,T19,T21,&T23 T16,T18,T20,T22,&T24 T25,T27,&T29 T26,T28,&T30 T31,T32,T33,T34,T39,&T42 T35,T36,T37,T38,T40,&T41 T43,T45,&T47 T44,T46,&T48 T49,T50,T51,T52,T53,T54,&T55 T56,T57,&T58 T59 & T60 T61,T62,T63,T64,&T65 T66,T67,T68,&T69 T70,T71,&T72 T73,T74,&T75 T76,T77,T78,&T79 T80,T81,T82,T83,&T84 T85,T86,T87,T88,&T89 T90,T91,&T92 T93,T94,T95,&T96 T97,T98,T99,&T100 T101,T102,T103,&T104 T105,T106,T107,&T108. As a further enhancement of efficiency and reduction of possible error, samples T109- T122 are the product of individual samples which were composited in the field. The 66
individual analyses of samples T1-T12 resulted in inadequate residual volumes for the analyses of a grouping. For these samples and others where conditions warranted, a numeric averaging of individual results was used for evaluation. Table A2 Source of Samples T1-T12 and T43, T45, & T47 Average Sample Number: Individual Sample Averaged: TA1 T1 & T3 TA2 T2 & T4 TA3 T5 & T7 TA4 T6 & T8 TA5 T9 & T11 TA6 T10 & T12 TA7 T43, T45, & T47. For samples TC1 through TC8, turbidity values for the respective individual samples were averaged in lieu of a composite analysis. 67
Page 1:
CRWR Online Report 95-6 AN EVALUATI
Page 5:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was s
Page 8 and 9:
4.2.3 TSS Reduction Efficiency of S
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 2.1
Page 13 and 14:
and reduce construction duration (G
Page 15 and 16:
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Introducti
Page 17 and 18:
are characterized by lower permeabi
Page 19 and 20:
size and is the estimated largest p
Page 21 and 22:
corrected to a viscosity at 20 o C
Page 23 and 24: Influent samples from each of the t
Page 25 and 26: emaining 10% ranged from 15 to 50
Page 27 and 28: Much less research has been directe
Page 29 and 30: Figure 3.1 Location of Inventoried
Page 31 and 32: Table 3.2 Costs of Temporary Contro
Page 33 and 34: The inventory data indicate that si
Page 35 and 36: nature of construction activities r
Page 37 and 38: the discharge was 1542 mg/L, with a
Page 39 and 40: emained in suspension and were able
Page 41 and 42: Effluent Sampling Location Rock Ber
Page 43 and 44: 5. LABORATORY TESTS OF SILT FENCES
Page 45 and 46: along with runoff from the flume. T
Page 47 and 48: Table 5.3 Grain sizes, Gradation, R
Page 49 and 50: phenomenon is similar to sediment-l
Page 51 and 52: w A S h 1 Silt Fence Figure 5.4 Vol
Page 53 and 54: Many of the tests ended after 48 ho
Page 55 and 56: observation demonstrates that field
Page 57 and 58: The permeameter initially was set u
Page 59 and 60: Flow per Area, cm/s 40 30 20 10 0 y
Page 61 and 62: 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 63 and 64: topping. Knowledge of the performan
Page 65 and 66: Das, B. M., 1985, “Principles of
Page 67: Soil Conservation Service (SCS), 19
Page 71 and 72: Sample Descriptions Samples T1-T30
Page 73: Samples T109-T122 Although samples
Page 77 and 78: 2 6 7 4 1 Fort McGrude Bannister Ln
Page 79 and 80: N T6 W W W W W W W W W W W T7 T5 T8
Page 81 and 82: LEGEND: -W- -NW- T18 Water Boundary
Page 83 and 84: T34 T38 NW NW NW NW T39 NW NW NW NW
Page 85 and 86: T49 T50 T53 T54 T58 W T55 W W W W T
Page 87 and 88: T75 W W W LEGEND: -W- -NW- T18 Wate
Page 89 and 90: N T105 T106 T107 T108 T97 T98 T101
Page 91 and 92: T117 N LEGEND: T118 -W- -NW- T18 Wa
Page 93: APPENDIX B - RESULTS OF SAMPLE ANAL
Page 96 and 97: SAMPLE DATE TIME DESCRIPTOR SITE TS
Page 98 and 99: T64 4/7/93 10:55AM UPSTREAM C 6 NIA
Page 100 and 101: Table B2. Results of Particle Size
Page 102 and 103: Table B4. Silt Fence Turbidity Redu
Page 105 and 106: Total Suspended Solids The analysis
Page 107 and 108: APPENDIX D - CATALOG OF FLUME TESTS
Page 109 and 110: Test number: 1 Influent Samples : D
Page 119 and 120: Test number: 11 Influent Samples :
Page 125 and 126:
Test number: 17 Influent Samples :
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
132
Page 141 and 142:
Amoco woven d = #20 sieve d = 8.50E
Page 143 and 144:
70 60 Flow per Area, cm/s 50 40 30
Page 145 and 146:
APPENDIX F - BASE EFFICIENCY TEST 1
Page 147 and 148:
Date = 9/17/94 Influent Samples: St
show all

View the Whole Report - Center for Research in Water Resources ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?