10.01.2015 Views

The_Holokaust_-_origins,_implementation,_aftermath

The_Holokaust_-_origins,_implementation,_aftermath

The_Holokaust_-_origins,_implementation,_aftermath

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HITLER’S DECISION TO EXTERMINATE JEWS<br />

place on January 20, 1942. It had originally been scheduled to occur on December<br />

9, 1941. Initial invitations to participate had gone out on November 29.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se dates are clearly later than the turning point that apparently occurred<br />

in the extermination policy in the early fall of 1941. Hence, according to the<br />

prevailing view, the purpose of the meeting could not have been a decision<br />

about whether to proceed with exterminations. Rather, its purpose must have<br />

involved secondary issues such as the division of authority, coordination, and<br />

organization. According to the minutes, 20 a variety of topics were discussed,<br />

and scholars differ as to which were the most important. Heydrich described the<br />

European-wide extermination program to the ministerial representatives in<br />

attendance. 21 He furnished them with information and tried to persuade them to<br />

accept his ultimate authority in the matter. 22 Heydrich also wanted to clear up<br />

any problems or differences of opinion arising from the inclusion of western,<br />

northern, and southeast European Jews, German “part-Jews,” and Jews working<br />

in the armaments industry. His aim was a unified, coordinated effort. 23<br />

Certainly none of these topics was insignificant. But there was one particular<br />

issue that made the meeting seem of utmost urgency in the eyes of the men who<br />

were responsible for shaping the extermination policy. This comes as something<br />

of a surprise, given the prevailing view that the decision had been made much<br />

earlier. Postwar testimony by some of the participants gives us an indication of<br />

the importance they attached to the resolution of this issue at the time of the<br />

conference. Georg Heuser, then head of the Gestapo offices in Minsk, testified<br />

that in the period before the Wannsee Conference “only eastern Jews” were to<br />

be executed. “Initially, German Jews were supposed to be resettled in the east.<br />

After the Wannsee Conference, we were told that all Jews were to be liquidated.” 24<br />

Furthermore, in his initial testimony, Adolf Eichmann also declared that “the<br />

Wannsee Conference was indeed the beginning of the real extermination story.” 25<br />

Eichmann’s interrogator, and after him many historians, countered that the murder<br />

to Jews in the Soviet Union had already begun; 26 but of course Eichmann’s<br />

statement could have referred only to the executions that he himself had to<br />

organize.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se statements by Heuser and Eichmann reveal that the authorities<br />

evidently still had to face another “problem” at the close of 1941, despite the<br />

prevailing notion that a decision on this matter had already been made earlier:<br />

should—or, more precisely, could—German Jews be executed, too<br />

II <strong>The</strong> original theme of the Wannsee Conference:<br />

the definition and treatment of German Jews<br />

On the afternoon of November 30, 1941, Himmler held a telephone conversation<br />

with Heydrich. After the call, he jotted down the notation: “Jewish transport<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!