10.01.2015 Views

The_Holokaust_-_origins,_implementation,_aftermath

The_Holokaust_-_origins,_implementation,_aftermath

The_Holokaust_-_origins,_implementation,_aftermath

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHRISTIAN GERLACH<br />

accounts, purportedly by eyewitnesses but difficult to verify, all deportees on<br />

several trains that arrived later in December 1941 were executed.<br />

Einsatzkommando 2 is reported to have separated out the weak and infirm and<br />

executed them. Attempts were made to conceal the murders, so that the reason<br />

for the selections would not become known “to local Jews or to Jews in the<br />

Reich.” 44<br />

Let us quickly summarize these rather gruesome results. A general order to<br />

execute German Jews had not yet been issued. In Lodz and Minsk, German officials<br />

and police allowed German Jews arriving in 1941 to survive. In Kaunas, however,<br />

all the arriving Jews were murdered. In Riga, finally, Jews on the first transport<br />

were openly killed. Those arriving later were initially kept alive, only to be shot<br />

later in “smaller” executions or to be killed by the horrendous living conditions,<br />

particularly the cold. Direct executions were concealed as much as possible.<br />

Objections were raised almost immediately by the civilian administrations.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y did not oppose the executions per se, but rather the deportations of non-<br />

Jews or privileged Jews, which could lead to the killing of people who had not<br />

been targeted and thus jeopardize political support for the “Final Solution” in<br />

general. Both Wilhelm Kube, general commissar in Minsk, and Hinrich Lohse<br />

sent to the Ministry for the East lists with the names of individuals who should<br />

not have been transported to the east, at least according to the rules then<br />

governing the deportations. <strong>The</strong> lists had been given to them by German Jews<br />

in the Minsk and Riga ghettos. On November 29, Kube had visited the separate<br />

“German ghetto” in Minsk. He subsequently issued a complaint that among the<br />

deportees there were many so-called “part-Jews” (who were not considered Jews<br />

under the Nuremberg laws), Jews married to “Aryans,” brothers of army<br />

servicemen, and decorated veterans of World War I. He lodged an immediate<br />

protest at the Ministry for the East. It appears to have been received there by<br />

December 8, at the latest. 45 Lohse’s reaction a short time later was similar, though<br />

less dramatic. Both objections, along with the lists of names, were forwarded to<br />

Heydrich by the deputy minister for the East, Alfred Meyer. 46<br />

This chronological sequence makes it clear, admittedly, that the objections<br />

raised by these two officials could not have been a decisive factor in the halting<br />

of the executions. 47 But these certainly could not have been the only protests. As<br />

early as October 10, Heydrich had declared that “no special consideration should<br />

be shown to Jews decorated during the war. On the contrary,” they should be<br />

“transported in percentages corresponding to their actual numbers.” 48 On<br />

November 20, Eichmann had circulated a memo outlining deportation directives.<br />

Its effect was to reduce the number of victims affected. Apparently Eichmann’s<br />

actions came because the RSHA had already received some complaints and was<br />

expecting more to follow. 49 Heydrich’s comments to Goebbels also suggest that<br />

this was the case. Heydrich planned to use the new camp at <strong>The</strong>resienstadt in the<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!