13.01.2015 Views

13.2 The Wallis Lake Estuary Management Committee - Great Lakes ...

13.2 The Wallis Lake Estuary Management Committee - Great Lakes ...

13.2 The Wallis Lake Estuary Management Committee - Great Lakes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Wallis</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> <strong>Estuary</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Plan<br />

7 Funding requirements and sources<br />

<strong>The</strong> total cost of implementing the 45 strategies recommending 151 actions addressing 9 general management<br />

themes (including implementation; Table 7.1) is $11,411,500. This cost may be considerably larger if the most cost<br />

effective and environmentally suitable wastewater management scheme for Coomba Park is to provide sewerage<br />

services, estimated at $8,910,000, and bringing the total cost of implementing the WLEMP to $20,321,500. Table<br />

7.2 distinguishes between the priority of the actions and includes a breakdown of expenditure. Some actions require<br />

an ongoing commitment from existing staff rather than the outlay of expenditure and this is noted as ‘Time’. For<br />

other actions an approximate costing is not yet possible (TBD), however the financial implications of implementing<br />

these actions may be substantial.<br />

Code <strong>Management</strong> theme # Strategies # Actions<br />

W Water quality and flow 11 36<br />

E Ecology 7 21<br />

F Fisheries 4 7<br />

O Oyster aquaculture 2 12<br />

S Sedimentation 3 8<br />

M Foreshore management 8 26<br />

U Waterway usage 3 11<br />

C Community education 6 22<br />

I Implementation 1 8<br />

[Table 7.1: Total number of actions and strategies for each management theme]<br />

Some recommended actions require significant capital costs, especially where large-scale works are involved such<br />

as dredging and foreshore protection structures. To finance these actions funding from alternative sources outside<br />

of council budgets will be necessary.<br />

Use of the full suite of funding opportunities is encouraged so that the objectives of the WLEMP can be realised. In<br />

addition to funds from GLC budgets and recurrent funds from DIPNR, DEC, Waterways and DPI, other potential<br />

funding sources include the Recreational Fishing Trust, the National Heritage Trust and the Hunter/Central Rivers<br />

CMA.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Hunter/Central Rivers CMA was formed in 2004 to report directly to the Minister for Infrastructure, Planning and<br />

Natural Resources on natural resource management issues in the Hunter/Central Rivers catchment region. Funds<br />

can be obtained from the CMA for projects in the region addressing vegetation and biodiversity, riparian and water<br />

quality, salinity, soils and acid sulfate soils.<br />

Continuation of the GLC environmental levee is critical to the implementation of this plan. <strong>The</strong> levee was first<br />

enforced mid 2001. Many actions in this plan have resulted from recommendations from studies conducted with<br />

funds from the first 3 years of the levee. If the Levee were to continue for 10 years it would allow these actions to be<br />

implemented.<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!