14.01.2015 Views

Vol 41 # 3 September 2009 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 41 # 3 September 2009 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 41 # 3 September 2009 - Kma.org.kw

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

196<br />

Population Health Genomics in Member Countries of the Cooperation Council for the Arab...<br />

research of genetic diseases in the Arab world was<br />

established six years ago in the United Arab Emirates<br />

with the aim of improving research and the exchange<br />

of information among researchers [109,117] . Recently,<br />

Saudi Arabia launched a genetic research project<br />

that includes a biological bank with the capacity to<br />

accommodate a large number of biological samples<br />

and thus to encourage genetic research in the<br />

kingdom, especially the investigation of gene-disease<br />

associations and gene-environment interactions [118] .<br />

Although there is great variation in the types and<br />

rates of genetic diseases in the Arab world, the GCC<br />

population tends to have similarities in this regard<br />

as a result of common demographic, cultural, social<br />

and health characteristics [1] .<br />

Differences among screening programs for<br />

newborns in the GCC countries are similar to those<br />

observed in Europe. Several countries, e.g., Austria<br />

and Germany, have included a large number of<br />

genetic diseases in their screening programs,<br />

whereas others, e.g., Great Britain and Switzerland,<br />

include very few diseases for reasons such as costeffectiveness<br />

[119] . Some European countries have not<br />

introduced any newborn screening programs for a<br />

variety of reasons such as the economic impact of<br />

such programs on health care resources [119] .<br />

The detection of diseases through newborn<br />

screening programs at present will increase<br />

awareness and knowledge and this would be<br />

expected to lead to improvements in health care<br />

management protocols, especially if there is<br />

collaboration across jurisdictions. Genetic disorders<br />

that are untreatable today may be manageable and<br />

even preventable in the future, and this argues<br />

for the importance of implementing screening<br />

programs in any country, establishing infrastructure<br />

first for conditions for which there is evidence that<br />

benefits are greater than harm and which can then<br />

be extended as evidence for other conditions as<br />

resources becomes available [119] .<br />

In the GCC countries, reported obstacles to the<br />

implementation of newborn screening programs<br />

include underdeveloped health systems and<br />

problems with the referral process, particularly in<br />

remote and rural areas. Other challenges include<br />

the provision of adequate education and training<br />

for medical staff to diagnose and manage genetic<br />

diseases, economic burden, public awareness,<br />

processes for collection and transportation of samples<br />

and reporting of results and the development of an<br />

efficient information system. Finally, the inclusion of<br />

appropriate screening tests for a specific population<br />

requires detailed research and investigation to<br />

evaluate cost-effectiveness and increase the public’s<br />

acceptance of screening programs [6,9,19,26,47,49,112] .<br />

The number and nature of genetic diseases<br />

included in screening programs should be based on<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />

local community experiences, reported surveillance<br />

data, and the results of previous research on the<br />

balance of benefits and harm. In circumstances<br />

where evidence to support a broadly based<br />

screening program is lacking or insufficient, the<br />

implementation of a pilot program targeted toward<br />

a subcategory of the population is recommended<br />

to investigate its impact and cost-effectiveness and<br />

potentially to encourage health policy-makers to<br />

implement the program at a national level [112] .<br />

In our review of the available data we found<br />

similarities between the GCC countries with respect<br />

to genetic disease prevalence (with rates that were<br />

high in comparison with those reported in Europe<br />

and North America) and with respect to the<br />

contribution of consanguineous marriage to those<br />

high rates. These similarities may be considered an<br />

advantage insofar as they provide a rationale for<br />

the GCC countries to collaborate with each other<br />

in disease surveillance and research and to adopt<br />

similar screening programs. A common screening<br />

program involving the total GCC population<br />

would also have a particular benefit for individual<br />

countries in that some of the monitored diseases<br />

are considered to be rare; thus, the pooling of data<br />

from different countries will enable faster progress<br />

in research. Effective population health genomics<br />

requires a multidisciplinary approach in which<br />

knowledge and experiences related to population<br />

health genomics are exchanged between the<br />

different sectors in each county [112] .<br />

Public understanding of genetic diseases has<br />

been shown to be correlated with educational level<br />

in the GCC countries [11,120] . Although parents of<br />

affected children may react with either denial or<br />

resignation to their situation, providing a scientific<br />

explanation can reduce feelings of guilt [120] . Health<br />

promotion activities regarding genetic diseases<br />

should be encouraged among the public at all levels,<br />

especially for younger people [12,25,28,31,46,120] .<br />

There has been an emphasis on the use of<br />

non-invasive methods such as ultrasound to<br />

detect congenital abnormalities in the prenatal<br />

period, since they do not cause discomfort when<br />

administered and are more readily accepted than<br />

invasive techniques [121] . However, pre-implantation<br />

genetic diagnosis (PGD) has the advantage of<br />

enabling therapeutic abortion to be avoided, since<br />

it is performed very early after fertilization in<br />

vitro [27,30,122] . This procedure seems to be acceptable<br />

among the GCC countries despite its high cost, but<br />

it is not widely available due to technology and<br />

economic barriers [12,122,123] . Because the diagnosis is<br />

made before implantation, the technique presents<br />

fewer ethical and religious concerns [122,123] and<br />

can reduce pregnancy terminations for high-risk<br />

couples [123] . Despite these advantages it requires

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!