14.01.2015 Views

Vol 41 # 3 September 2009 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 41 # 3 September 2009 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 41 # 3 September 2009 - Kma.org.kw

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>September</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />

KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL 237<br />

Table 1: Patient data, pre-reduction evaluation and post reduction findings<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

Sex<br />

F<br />

M<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

F<br />

M<br />

F<br />

F<br />

M<br />

F<br />

F<br />

M<br />

F<br />

F<br />

M<br />

F<br />

F<br />

Affected<br />

hip<br />

Rt<br />

Rt<br />

Lt<br />

Lt<br />

Lt<br />

Lt<br />

Lt<br />

Lt<br />

Lt<br />

Lt<br />

Lt<br />

Rt<br />

Rt<br />

Lt<br />

Rt<br />

Rt<br />

Rt<br />

Rt<br />

Lt<br />

Lt<br />

Rt<br />

Lt<br />

Rt<br />

Lt<br />

Lt<br />

Lt<br />

Rt<br />

Lt<br />

Rt<br />

Age at<br />

reduction<br />

(months)<br />

3<br />

1<br />

1<br />

4<br />

1<br />

3<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4.5<br />

6<br />

2<br />

3<br />

3<br />

3<br />

1<br />

4<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

1<br />

1<br />

3.5<br />

2<br />

3<br />

3<br />

5<br />

1<br />

2<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Prereduction<br />

U/S<br />

(Graf)<br />

II D<br />

III<br />

III<br />

IV<br />

II D<br />

II D<br />

IV<br />

IV<br />

III<br />

III<br />

II D<br />

III<br />

III<br />

III<br />

IV<br />

IV<br />

IV<br />

IV<br />

IV<br />

III<br />

II D<br />

II D<br />

III<br />

Prereduction<br />

radiograph<br />

Tonnis<br />

AC o<br />

Period of<br />

immobilization<br />

(weeks)<br />

Follow-up<br />

(months)<br />

O.R = open reduction, SD = standard deviation, CFE = capital femoral epiphysis, D = decentered hip<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

2<br />

4<br />

2<br />

45<br />

42<br />

38<br />

40<br />

44<br />

34<br />

9<br />

11<br />

11<br />

8<br />

9<br />

6<br />

11<br />

6<br />

6<br />

6<br />

X<br />

9<br />

8<br />

X<br />

4<br />

X<br />

6<br />

6<br />

6<br />

X<br />

9 x<br />

X<br />

10<br />

10<br />

X<br />

6<br />

8<br />

6<br />

12<br />

24<br />

24<br />

24<br />

24<br />

75<br />

37<br />

30<br />

93<br />

24<br />

24<br />

24<br />

24<br />

24<br />

60<br />

28<br />

28<br />

68<br />

58<br />

44<br />

48<br />

24<br />

26<br />

Normalization<br />

of AC o<br />

2 nd SD<br />

1 st SD<br />

1 st SD<br />

Abnormal<br />

Normal<br />

Normal<br />

1 st SD<br />

Normal<br />

2 nd SD<br />

Abnormal<br />

O.R<br />

border line<br />

1 st SD<br />

O.R<br />

Abnormal<br />

O.R<br />

Normal<br />

Abnormal<br />

Abnormal<br />

O.R<br />

O.R<br />

O.R<br />

Normal<br />

Normal<br />

O.R<br />

Normal<br />

Abnormal<br />

2 nd SD<br />

Normal<br />

Changes in CFE<br />

No changes<br />

No changes<br />

Small<br />

Mottling<br />

Mottling<br />

Small mottling<br />

No changes<br />

No changes<br />

No changes<br />

No changes<br />

No changes<br />

Small<br />

Small<br />

No changes<br />

No changes<br />

No changes<br />

No changes<br />

Mottling<br />

No changes<br />

No changes<br />

Small<br />

No changes<br />

of life with Graf sonographic classification II D and<br />

higher or Tonnis radiographic classification type<br />

2 and higher and a minimum of two years follow<br />

up. The exclusion criteria included all cases with<br />

insufficient data or incomplete follow up, cases<br />

with epiphyseal dysplasia, arthrogryposis or caudal<br />

regression syndrome, all neuromuscular cases or<br />

cases complicated by septic arthritis of the hip.<br />

The final study group included 26 patients (29<br />

hips). In cases where capital femoral epiphysis<br />

(CFE) had not yet appeared Graf sonographic<br />

classification was used (23 hips) [2] . The Tonnis<br />

radiographic classification was used in six hips after<br />

the appearance of CFE.<br />

Normal acetabular angle refers to the angle within<br />

the mean ± 2SD of normal. Any acetabular angle<br />

outside mean ± 2SD is described as abnormal [3] .<br />

Traction (longitudinal followed by overhead)<br />

was used only in five cases because of<br />

high dislocation three out of which had initial<br />

irreducibility. Adductor tenotomy was used only<br />

when the adductors were tight (6 cases).<br />

Closed reduction in all hips was performed<br />

under general anesthesia. Because of its accuracy, the<br />

intra-operative arthrogram (Fig. 1) was used in all<br />

cases to confirm concentric reduction [4] . Reduction<br />

was defined as concentric if the hip was located<br />

anatomically with minimal medial dye pooling.<br />

Clinical stability was assessed according to the<br />

safe zone of Ramsey [5] , The reinforcement of tactile<br />

sensation of the hip stability by visualization during<br />

arthrography is invaluable in the management of<br />

DDH [6] . Hips requiring more than 60° of abduction<br />

were considered unstable and booked later for<br />

open reduction. Post reduction, all cases were kept<br />

in spica cast in the human position [1] . After four to<br />

six weeks all cases underwent removal of spica cast,<br />

re-arthrography and examination under anesthesia.<br />

The plaster (POP) was kept for an average period<br />

of 8.3 weeks (range: 4 -12 weeks). After removal of<br />

spica cast all cases were kept in abduction brace<br />

for an average period of three to six months. The<br />

average period of follow up was 42.4 months (range:<br />

24 – 93 months).<br />

Avascular necrosis of the femoral head was<br />

defined according to the radiographic criteria of<br />

Bucholz & Ogden [7] which includes criteria of AVN<br />

described by Salter [1] supplemented by criteria of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!