14.01.2015 Views

Vol 41 # 3 September 2009 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 41 # 3 September 2009 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 41 # 3 September 2009 - Kma.org.kw

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

228<br />

Blunt and Penetrating Thoracic Trauma: Management Strategy and Short-Term Outcome<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />

Fig. 2: Posteroanterior chest radiograph of a patient stabbed with a<br />

metal bar into his right hemithorax<br />

for bleeding, three patients (2%) had postoperative<br />

atelectasis requiring bronchoscopy and suction,<br />

two patients (1%) required prolonged mechanical<br />

ventilation and two patients (1%) had prolonged air<br />

leak that was treated conservatively.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Penetrating and blunt thoracic injuries frequently<br />

cause serious injuries to pulmonary, cardiac and<br />

thoracic vascular structures. Most chest trauma<br />

victims can be successfully managed without<br />

operation [3,7,8] . Penetrating injuries to the chest in a<br />

civilian practice result mainly from stab injuries or<br />

gunshot wounds [8] (Fig. 2, 3). In patients who require<br />

operative intervention, complex investigations are<br />

usually not needed to arrive at a diagnosis and<br />

prompt surgery is all that is needed. Delaying urgent<br />

surgery and ongoing blood loss are associated with<br />

the occurrence of ARDS that will lead to a higher<br />

mortality [8] . In this article, we review our experience<br />

with blunt and penetrating chest injuries in patients<br />

who underwent surgical interventions with emphasis<br />

on surgical approaches and postoperative outcome.<br />

Our preoperative management strategies include<br />

draining pleural collection of blood and air, aggressive<br />

resuscitation and when indicated, urgent surgery<br />

without resorting to unnecessary investigations.<br />

Most patients sustaining blunt thoracic injuries<br />

reaching alive in the emergency department can be<br />

managed non-operatively [1-3] . Diagnosis of blunt<br />

injuries may be more difficult and require additional<br />

investigations such as CT scan. Delayed diagnosis<br />

usually reflect concealed injuries such as those<br />

depicted in Table 3 and these in turn are associated<br />

with delayed operative approach due to failure to<br />

recognize them at an early stage. Massive air leak<br />

usually denotes tracheo-bronchial injury or massive<br />

pulmonary laceration. Early diagnosis and surgical<br />

intervention can improve the prognosis [1-3,6] . The<br />

diagnosis of major airway injury depends first, on<br />

Fig. 3: Posteroanterior chest radiograph of a patient with penetrating<br />

injury (metal screw) into his anterior mediastinum<br />

physical examination and then, on findings on chest<br />

radiography. Accurate interpretation of the chest<br />

radiograph is essential in the diagnosis of bronchial<br />

injury. Subcutaneous emphysema and pneumothorax<br />

was present in 10 patients in this series. Liberal use<br />

of bronchoscopy is important to make the diagnosis.<br />

Majority of these injuries can be repaired primarily.<br />

We tried to avoid lung resections in patients with lung<br />

lacerations. Resections are only resorted to when there<br />

is a complex bronchial injury beyond repair. This is to<br />

avoid subsequent high morbidity and mortality [3, 6] .<br />

Thoracotomy was the principal procedure used in<br />

our series, being done in 87% of cases (Table 1). This<br />

is in contrast to video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS)<br />

which was done in 8% of cases. VATS can be used<br />

safely in hemodynamically stable patients with no<br />

cardiovascular or great vessel injury, sparing many<br />

patients the pain and morbidity associated with a<br />

thoracotomy incision [7] . In addition, VATS can allow<br />

visualization of all lung fields. Its use in our series was<br />

low due to the emergency nature of our patients. VATS<br />

use tends to be reserved for hemodynamically stable<br />

patients provided adequate equipment is available. This<br />

was not the case since our series encompassed patients<br />

operated upon in six different general hospitals, most<br />

of which lacked appropriate instruments required for<br />

VATS. The use of other techniques such as sternotomy or<br />

thoraco-abdominal approach was only limited to some<br />

cases (Table 1) as dictated by the initial presentation and<br />

assessment of these individualized cases.<br />

Delayed surgical intervention can result in a high<br />

mortality. In our series, overall mortality was only<br />

4% (7 patients), three of which died intra-operatively<br />

from cardiac arrest and four had developed ARDS<br />

postoperatively. Overall morbidity in this series occurred<br />

in 10 patients (7%). Only three patients required reexploration<br />

for bleeding. The remainder were due to<br />

postoperative atelectasis and prolonged ventilation or<br />

prolonged air leak that settled conservatively. Certainly,<br />

the complexity of most of these cases necessitates

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!