14.01.2015 Views

Vol 41 # 3 September 2009 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 41 # 3 September 2009 - Kma.org.kw

Vol 41 # 3 September 2009 - Kma.org.kw

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>September</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />

KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL 215<br />

Original Article<br />

External Non-Invasive Cardiac Pacemaker: Evaluation of<br />

Usefulness, Function and Capture Failure Rate<br />

Ali Mohamad Hegazy 1 , Ahmad Ali Al-Dousary 1 , Mousa AJ Akbar 2 , Saleh El-Enezy 1<br />

1<br />

Department of Medicine, Farwania Hospital, Kuwait<br />

2<br />

Department of Medicine, Sabah Hospital, Kuwait<br />

Kuwait Medical Journal <strong>2009</strong>; <strong>41</strong> (3): 215-221<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical usefulness, safety and<br />

efficacy of the non-invasive temporary pacemaker (NTP)<br />

Design: Cohort observational study<br />

Settings: Department of Medicine, Farwania and Sabah<br />

Hospitals, Kuwait<br />

Subjects: One hundred and forty patients who<br />

presented with asystolic cardiac arrest and symptomatic<br />

bradyarrythmias<br />

Interventions: Application of a NTP that functions as<br />

VVI demand pacemaker with separate external pacing<br />

and sensing electrodes.<br />

Main Outcome Measures: Evaluation of pacemaker<br />

capture done by palpating carotid artery pulse, noninvasive<br />

blood pressure recording and transthoracic<br />

echocardiography<br />

Results: Out of 140 patients, only 76 patients responded<br />

well to NTP. Predictive indices revealed that dilated<br />

cardiomyopathy is considered as negative predictor for<br />

the failure of NTP to capture the ventricle. Sensitivity<br />

was 73%, specificity = 90%, accuracy = 78%, positive<br />

predictive value = 95% and negative predictive value<br />

= 59% respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that<br />

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) status,<br />

left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), serum potassium,<br />

chest size and left ventricular end diastolic dimension<br />

(LVEDD) as independent variables were negative<br />

predictors for failure of NTP to capture the ventricle (p <<br />

0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve data<br />

revealed that the best cut-off value for serum potassium<br />

was 3.0 mmol/l with a sensitivity = 77% and false<br />

positive = 24%, LVEF = 15% with sensitivity = 84% and<br />

false positive = 19% and LVEDD = 7.6 cm with sensitivity<br />

= 74% and false positive = 28% to predict the failure of<br />

NTP to capture the ventricle.<br />

Conclusion: Transcutaneous pacemaker appears to<br />

offer benefit and may become an important tool in the<br />

management of patients with symptomatic bradycardia<br />

and asystolic cardiac arrest.<br />

KEY WORDS: bradyarrhythmias, cardiac arrest, cardiac pacemaker<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

External non-invasive electric cardiac<br />

stimulation was introduced in 1952 as a clinically<br />

useful means of providing effective ventricular<br />

beats in emergency situations of ventricular<br />

standstill or symptomatic bradycardia [1] . A<br />

technique for this purpose had to be simple,<br />

reliable and quickly and easily applied. Since<br />

arrest often recurs, the technique also had to be<br />

free of invasive procedures or other significant<br />

risks [2] . External electric stimulation did meet these<br />

requirements and was widely used for many years<br />

for ventricular standstill or bradycardia of any<br />

cause and for prevention by overdrive suppression<br />

of multifocal and repetitive ventricular beats,<br />

tachycardia and fibrillation [3,4] . Non-invasive<br />

temporary pacemakers (NTPs) were often prepared<br />

for emergency use by preliminary determination<br />

of the threshold for stimulation and were kept in<br />

standby readiness during periods of increased risk<br />

of arrest [5,6] . Cardiac stimulation by any technique<br />

was found to be ineffective in patients in cardiac<br />

arrest due to ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation<br />

or to severely depressed myocardial excitability: it<br />

rarely aroused electrical and mechanical response<br />

after prolonged anoxic arrest [7,8] .<br />

A modified external NTP-monitor was introduced<br />

in 1983 [8] . This instrument achieves temporary<br />

stimulation in the conscious patient that is usually<br />

comfortable and also allows clear recognition of<br />

cardiac responses to stimulation [9] .<br />

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical<br />

usefulness, safety and efficacy of external NTP in<br />

patients with symptomatic bradyarrhythmias, as well<br />

as evaluate independent negative predictors for the<br />

failure of NTP to capture the ventricle.<br />

Address correspondence to:<br />

Dr. Ali Hegazy, Department of Medicine, Farwania Hospital, Kuwait, 81004, P. O, Box 18373. Tel: 0(965) 4882379, E-mail: alymhd57@hotmail.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!