15.01.2015 Views

Fall/Winter 2006 - University of Toronto Press Publishing

Fall/Winter 2006 - University of Toronto Press Publishing

Fall/Winter 2006 - University of Toronto Press Publishing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

N E W I N PA P E R B A C K<br />

Imagining London<br />

Postcolonial Fiction and the Transnational Metropolis<br />

John Clement Ball<br />

London was once the hub <strong>of</strong> an empire on which ‘the<br />

sun never set.’ After the Second World War, as Britain<br />

withdrew from most <strong>of</strong> its colonies, the city that once<br />

possessed the world began to contain a diasporic world<br />

that was increasingly taking possession <strong>of</strong> it. Drawing<br />

on postcolonial theories, as well as interdisciplinary<br />

perspectives from cultural geography, urban theory,<br />

history, and sociology, Imagining London examines<br />

representations <strong>of</strong> the English metropolis in Canadian,<br />

West Indian, Indian, and second-generation ‘black<br />

British’ novels written in the last half <strong>of</strong> the twentieth<br />

century. It analyses the diverse ways in which London<br />

is experienced and portrayed as a transnational space<br />

by Commonwealth expatriates and migrants.<br />

As the former ‘heart <strong>of</strong> empire’ and a contemporary<br />

‘world city,’ London metonymically represents<br />

the British Empire in two distinct ways. In the early<br />

years <strong>of</strong> decolonization, it was a primarily white<br />

city that symbolized imperial power and history.<br />

Over time, as migrants from former colonies have<br />

‘reinvaded the centre’ and changed its demographic<br />

and cultural constitution, it has come to represent<br />

empire as a global microcosm and pr<strong>of</strong>oundly<br />

relational locale. John Clement Ball examines the<br />

work <strong>of</strong> more than twenty writers, including established<br />

authors such as Robertson Davies, Mordecai<br />

Richler, Jean Rhys, Sam Selvon, V.S. Naipaul,<br />

Anita Desai, and Salman Rushdie, and newer voices<br />

such as Catherine Bush, David Dabydeen, Amitav<br />

Ghosh, Hanif Kureishi, and Zadie Smith.<br />

John Clement Ball is an associate pr<strong>of</strong>essor in the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> English at the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> New<br />

Brunswick.<br />

LITERARY STUDIES / CULTURAL STUDIES<br />

265 pp / 6 x 9 / Available<br />

ISBN 0-8020-9455-4 / 978-0-8020-9455-1<br />

£14.95 $27.95 C<br />

Originally published in cloth: June 2004<br />

Gramsci’s Politics <strong>of</strong><br />

Language<br />

Engaging the Bakhtin Circle and the Frankfurt School<br />

Peter Ives<br />

CULTURAL SPACES. WINNER OF THE RAYMOND KLIBANSKY PRIZE<br />

Antonio Gramsci and his concept <strong>of</strong> hegemony<br />

have permeated social and political theory, cultural<br />

studies, education studies, literary criticism, international<br />

relations, and post-colonial theory. The<br />

centrality <strong>of</strong> language and linguistics to Gramsci’s<br />

thought, however, has been wholly neglected. In<br />

Gramsci’s Politics <strong>of</strong> Language, Peter Ives argues that<br />

a university education in linguistics and a preoccupation<br />

with Italian language politics were integral<br />

to the theorist’s thought. Ives explores how the<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> Marxism and linguistics produced<br />

a unique and intellectually powerful approach to<br />

social and political analysis.<br />

To explicate Gramsci’s writings on language,<br />

Ives compares them with other Marxist approaches<br />

to language, including those <strong>of</strong> the Bakhtin<br />

Circle, Walter Benjamin, and the Frankfurt<br />

School, including Jürgen Habermas. From these<br />

comparisons, Ives elucidates the implications <strong>of</strong><br />

Gramsci’s writings, which, he argues, retained the<br />

explanatory power <strong>of</strong> the semiotic and dialogic<br />

insights <strong>of</strong> Bakhtin and the critical perspective <strong>of</strong><br />

the Frankfurt School, while at the same time foreshadowing<br />

the key problems with both approaches<br />

that post-structuralist critiques would later reveal.<br />

Gramsci’s Politics <strong>of</strong> Language fills a crucial gap in<br />

scholarship, linking Gramsci’s writings to current<br />

debates in social theory and providing a<br />

framework for a thoroughly historical-materialist<br />

approach to language.<br />

Peter Ives is an assistant pr<strong>of</strong>essor in the Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Politics at the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Winnipeg.<br />

POLITICS / CULTURAL STUDIES<br />

288 pp / 6 x 9 / May <strong>2006</strong><br />

ISBN 0-8020-9444-9 / 978-0-8020-9444-5<br />

£18.00 $27.95 C<br />

Originally published in cloth: May 2004<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!