schedule of planning applications

3. Increased vehicular access and egress close to the
bend of New Road and junction of New Road and
Dudsbury Crescent.
4. Loss of established trees on the current boundary of
300 & 302 which would affect the integrity of the habitat.
5. Much hard paving for driveway and parking leading to
excess surface water in an area already subject to
ground flooding.
6. 10 windows on the North elevation that would
overlook the adjacent property No.304.
Consultee Responses:
EDDC Tree Section
Prior to leaving, Jonathan Astill provided informal
comments that implied this new scheme was an
improvement on the previous scheme and that subject to
a landscaping scheme and an amended arboricultural
method statement being submitted, he was satisfied that
the short term impact on the treescape would not be
significant and that no arboricultural objections were
therefore likely to be raised.
Taking this into consideration, should you be minded to
approve this application please include a condition.
County Rights Of Way Officer
No response received
Sembcorp Bournemouth
Water Ltd.
Safeguarding Officer
EDDC Design And
Conservation
Objections:
Inappropriate relationship with the Strategic Raw Water
Main
Contrary to policy BUCON6- overly dominant and
overbearing
Harm to protected trees
Detrimental to highway safety
Contrary to heathland policy- appeal decision at 80 Golf
Links Road is material
No safeguarding objection subject to conditions relating
to landscaping and drainage to avoid bird strike hazard.
There has been a succession of revisions to this scheme
in response to our design comments, culminating in the
current proposals. These revised proposals represent a
significant improvement over the previous submissions.
The architect has successfully reduced the height of the
block so that it relates better with the ridge and eaves
heights of neighbouring properties. The roof configuration
is a bit convoluted, but at least it helps to articulate the
building's bulk.
37