schedule of planning applications

More documents

Recommendations

Info

holding 200 people who will all need transport. This is not acceptable in a green belt residential area. 3. Toilets - The nearest toilets would be at least 100m away. Inconvenient on a wet evening. 4. Why - The club already has function rooms, bars and restaurant, all of which are capable of proper sound insulation. Is this not enough Out of character and appearance. Will not respect the amenities of neighbouring residents. It appears that all the groundwork has been done. Mrs S P Weeden Broadmead, 135 Christchurch Road Object Although planning has not yet been granted work is already in progress. Proposed marquee is apparently to be used for weddings and other functions and will have a stage. This I presume would be for a live band or DJ so there will be loud music with only the thickness of the canvas keeping it from annoying the local residents. I am strongly opposed to this proposal and I also speak for Mr & Mrs Redman from 137 and Mr & Mrs Ridout from 131. We have to put up with drunken people leaving the Golf Club after a function. These people can be very loud and have thrown glasses into our garden and urinate in our driveway. Also with this live music and the prevailing wind blowing towards our houses this is most certainly going to disturb the peace. Over the years we have had to put up with more and more from the Golf Club be it noise, fireworks or drunkards. I think this marquee would be the final straw and if this were allowed to go ahead we would have to contact the police with regard to the disturbance. Officers Report: This application is brought to Committee due to the part retrospective nature of the proposal and the number of objections received. The Proposal This application is for the erection of a marquee between the months of April and October for use as an ancillary wedding venue approximately 80m to the west of the existing golf clubhouse to the south of the Christchurch Road (B3073). The proposed marquee is 40 metres long by 15 metres wide and 5.7m high to ridge and is to be erected on a substantial and permanent deck base. The decked area covers an area of 840 sq.m and will remain on site for the rest of the year when the marquee is taken down. The submitted plan also shows a bund approx 2.5 metres raised between the marquee site and the tree belt that forms the boundary of the site with Christchurch Road. The land is within the South East Dorset Green Belt. 80
A recent site visit revealed that the substantial timber carcassing for the marquee base had already been constructed and the area of decking to the south of the marquee had been laid. In addition the bund had been raised against the northern boundary. This bund was of bare earth and appeared to be of recent construction. To the east and abutting the marquee site the land had been levelled and a hardcore base laid with a 2m fence under construction around the levelled area comprising concrete posts with timber panel infill, giving the appearance of an enclosed parking area. This impression is reinforced by the raised kerbing leading to the marquee site. The application form and planning statement states that permission is being sought for the marquee only although the submitted drawings show the bund and the area of decking to the south of the marquee site. The erection of the bund and the levelling of the area which has been laid out for (presumably) parking are an engineering operation that would require express planning permission. However, this report will focus solely on the proposed marquee and its immediate works as described on the application form. Planning History The Golf Club has an extensive planning history, part of which relates to its original function as a golf club and more recently, planning applications to provide a 17 bedroom hotel extension and spa, reception area with lounge and bar above which was granted contrary to the Officer recommendation on 11.2.2010 which increased the floor space of the clubhouse by approx. 890sqm. Policy National Planning guidance regarding development in the Green Belt is set out in Planning Policy Guidance 2: Green Belts. The site is within the open countryside therefore Policy CSIDE1 will also apply. Policy DES2 resists any development that would impose any unacceptable impact by way of noise or other pollution and is also a relevant consideration. Considerations The principal consideration is the effect of this proposal upon the openness and amenity of the South East Dorset Green Belt. The guidance contained in PPG2 requires any local planning authority to establish whether the use falls within a number of purposes that are considered appropriate development within the green belt (subject to it meeting any other considerations) and secondly, if the proposal is considered inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations. As members will be aware, inappropriate development is, by definition harmful to the Green Belt and in such cases it is for the applicant to show why permission should be granted. Very special circumstances will not exist unless the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm are clearly outweighed by other considerations. PPG2 states that in view of the presumption against inappropriate development, the Secretary of State will attach substantial weight to the harm to the green belt when considering any planning application or appeal concerning such development. 81
Page 1 and 2:
Everyone 7 128 2153 rep_agd_ID Draf
Page 3 and 4:
Site Description The application si
Page 5 and 6:
the pitches and ridge heights of ro
Page 7 and 8:
Reason: This condition is required
Page 9 and 10:
een constructed and these shall be
Page 11 and 12:
Neighbour Comments: Mrs Charlie Cha
Page 13 and 14:
Mrs Tina Thompson 4 Markham Close,
Page 15 and 16:
Carroll Avenue, Ferndown Miss Stace
Page 17 and 18:
lopped or removed have been treated
Page 19 and 20:
the number of children at the nurse
Page 21 and 22:
are 51 at any one time with a total
Page 23 and 24:
minimised by the extension’s sing
Page 25 and 26:
4 The extension hereby permitted sh
Page 27 and 28:
Consultee Responses: County Highway
Page 29 and 30: There is no need to provide mitigat
Page 31 and 32: Comments: This will compromise the
Page 33 and 34: Item Number: 5. Ref: 3/11/0405/HOU
Page 35 and 36: dormer, it should not have a great
Page 37 and 38: 3. Increased vehicular access and e
Page 39 and 40: properties. There is no precedent f
Page 41 and 42: associated mitigation proposals wer
Page 43 and 44: possible. The development will take
Page 45 and 46: oad, despite it being designated a
Page 47 and 48: We appreciate the owners of these t
Page 49 and 50: The SPG requires that new developme
Page 51 and 52: It is therefore suggested that an i
Page 53 and 54: 8 The development hereby permitted
Page 55 and 56: Item Number: 7. Ref: 3/11/0474/OUT
Page 57 and 58: Avenue, St Leonards Miss Louise Jam
Page 59 and 60: unviable. A dwelling on the propose
Page 61 and 62: temporarily residing at Green Cotta
Page 63 and 64: Comments: Location of site, overloo
Page 65 and 66: screaming. I believe this will caus
Page 67 and 68: Reason: This condition is required
Page 69 and 70: 11. Would East Dorset District Coun
Page 71 and 72: Item Number: 10. Ref: 3/11/0546/FUL
Page 73 and 74: cycle clothing prior to changing. T
Page 75 and 76: Informatives: 1 In considering the
Page 77 and 78: Christchurch Ferndown Road, 1. Gree
Page 79: 4. Where will toilet facilities be
Page 83 and 84: The Agent does refer in the Design
Page 85 and 86: would be no reasonable remedy avail
show all

schedule of planning applications

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?