schedule of planning applications

More documents

Recommendations

Info

perfect breeding ground for rodents. Environment - building a non-essential construction on an excellent playing field promotes the philosophy that playing fields are of little value. Future generations of children will suffer. Section 15 of PPG17: the proposal is ancillary to the use of the site as a playing field (eg new changing rooms) and does not adversely affect the quantity or quality of pitches and their use. the proposal only affects land which is incapable of forming a playing pitch (or part of one). the playing fields that would be lost as a result of the proposal would be replaced by a playing field(s) of equivalent or better quantity and quality and in a suitable location. the proposal is for an outdoor or indoor sports facility of sufficient benefit to the development of sport to outweigh the loss of the playing field. Application is of a low standard and missing vital information, disabled access, soft edges to ensure children's safety. Are the sails really for UV protection Why only cover part of the garden School is only thinking about aesthetics. If granted, it will be contravening the guidelines set out to protect green fields for future generation. Mr Derek Homer 177 Cutlers Place, Colehill Mrs J Walter 175 Cutlers Place, Colehill Object In principle I think the idea and concept of a 'quiet prayer area' is to be applauded especially with a 'well planted and maintained' low level garden. However my main concern is with the proposed 'sails to be erected' which would detract from the otherwise 'solitude to be created'. (As a compromise could a stow-away concave rollerblind used only when required be considered). Is there a guarantee that the area will not be used for 'party time or BBQ' as this would compromise the serenity of the garden Has due consideration been given to the effect on natural drainage from the land having given up an area of natural seepage in addition to previous extra classrooms reducing the surface area overall. (Our row of houses have in recent years experienced an increase in water drainage problems due to a changing water table level and spring water outlets in times of heavy rainfall). Object The garden is close to our properties. The location planned is on higher ground than my back garden and people are able to look directly into my garden and home which is an invasion of my privacy. There has already been noisy weekends with children 64
screaming. I believe this will cause more flooding issues in our gardens. Mrs P S Williamson 193 Cutlers Place, Colehill Ms B Trickett 173 Cutlers Place, Colehill Object Question why the new garden has been situated closer to the residential properties of Cutlers Place rather than building closer to the school itself. Due to the topographical nature of the plot, there would be greater visibility into my and my neighbours' properties which raises privacy and social concerns. What thought has been put into ensuring the increased water runoff is drained away properly and does not pose any threat to my property or garden. Has any thought been put into screening off the new garden with a solid fence to ensure privacy is maintained and to ensure that previous incidents of stone throwing into my garden by students is prevented. Object No consideration has been taken to us the residents. I feel my privacy will be greatly affected by the noise factor and the fact people can see straight through my bedroom and dining room windows. They state it will only be used during school hours but how long will it be before we have parties and BBQS at the weekends Noise issues Sails are going to be an eyesore from my property - can they not use a sunscreen We have flooding problems which the council are aware of - this will add to our problem. Has this been addressed property Officers Report: This application is brought before members as there are letters of objection from five neighbouring properties concerned primarily with noise, loss of privacy by overlooking, the area used for social functions, water run off and the visual intrusion of the proposed sails. Site Description The application site comprises St Catherines Catholic Primary School with its single storey building, temporary classrooms, car park and substantial playing fields. It lies within the urban area and is accessed off Cutlers Place. Work has commenced on creating a prayer garden in the far southwest corner of the site where the land falls away sharply towards the rear of nos. 171 – 177 and no.193 Cutlers Place. Boundary treatment here comprises 2m high railings beyond which are the rear fencing panels of the residential properties. There is additional tree screening along the side boundary of no. 193. 65
Page 1 and 2:
Everyone 7 128 2153 rep_agd_ID Draf
Page 3 and 4:
Site Description The application si
Page 5 and 6:
the pitches and ridge heights of ro
Page 7 and 8:
Reason: This condition is required
Page 9 and 10:
een constructed and these shall be
Page 11 and 12:
Neighbour Comments: Mrs Charlie Cha
Page 13 and 14: Mrs Tina Thompson 4 Markham Close,
Page 15 and 16: Carroll Avenue, Ferndown Miss Stace
Page 17 and 18: lopped or removed have been treated
Page 19 and 20: the number of children at the nurse
Page 21 and 22: are 51 at any one time with a total
Page 23 and 24: minimised by the extension’s sing
Page 25 and 26: 4 The extension hereby permitted sh
Page 27 and 28: Consultee Responses: County Highway
Page 29 and 30: There is no need to provide mitigat
Page 31 and 32: Comments: This will compromise the
Page 33 and 34: Item Number: 5. Ref: 3/11/0405/HOU
Page 35 and 36: dormer, it should not have a great
Page 37 and 38: 3. Increased vehicular access and e
Page 39 and 40: properties. There is no precedent f
Page 41 and 42: associated mitigation proposals wer
Page 43 and 44: possible. The development will take
Page 45 and 46: oad, despite it being designated a
Page 47 and 48: We appreciate the owners of these t
Page 49 and 50: The SPG requires that new developme
Page 51 and 52: It is therefore suggested that an i
Page 53 and 54: 8 The development hereby permitted
Page 55 and 56: Item Number: 7. Ref: 3/11/0474/OUT
Page 57 and 58: Avenue, St Leonards Miss Louise Jam
Page 59 and 60: unviable. A dwelling on the propose
Page 61 and 62: temporarily residing at Green Cotta
Page 63: Comments: Location of site, overloo
Page 67 and 68: Reason: This condition is required
Page 69 and 70: 11. Would East Dorset District Coun
Page 71 and 72: Item Number: 10. Ref: 3/11/0546/FUL
Page 73 and 74: cycle clothing prior to changing. T
Page 75 and 76: Informatives: 1 In considering the
Page 77 and 78: Christchurch Ferndown Road, 1. Gree
Page 79 and 80: 4. Where will toilet facilities be
Page 81 and 82: A recent site visit revealed that t
Page 83 and 84: The Agent does refer in the Design
Page 85 and 86: would be no reasonable remedy avail
show all

schedule of planning applications

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?