21.01.2015 Views

World Bank Document - Mumbai Railway Vikas Corporation Ltd ...

World Bank Document - Mumbai Railway Vikas Corporation Ltd ...

World Bank Document - Mumbai Railway Vikas Corporation Ltd ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Public Disclosure Authorized<br />

<strong>Document</strong> of<br />

The <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong><br />

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY<br />

Report No: 54171-IN<br />

Public Disclosure Authorized<br />

Public Disclosure Authorized<br />

PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT<br />

ON A<br />

PROPOSED LOAN<br />

IN THE AMOUNT OF US$430 MILLION<br />

TO THE<br />

REPUBLIC OF INDIA<br />

FOR A<br />

MUMBAI URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT – 2A<br />

June 2, 2010<br />

Public Disclosure Authorized<br />

Sustainable Development Unit<br />

India Country Management Unit<br />

South Asia Region<br />

This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the<br />

performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without <strong>World</strong><br />

<strong>Bank</strong> authorization.


CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS<br />

(Exchange Rate Effective April 30, 2010)<br />

Currency Unit = Indian Rupees<br />

Rs. 44.42 = $1.0<br />

FISCAL YEAR<br />

April 1 – March 31<br />

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS<br />

AC Alternating Current KV Kilovolt<br />

ACA Additional Central Assistance m/s/s meters per second per second<br />

ASCI Administrative Staff College of India MAA Memorandum and Articles of Association<br />

CAG Comptroller and Auditor General MMR <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region<br />

CGFA<br />

Corporate Governance and Financial<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region Development<br />

MMRDA<br />

Accountability<br />

Authority<br />

CPSU Central Public Sector Undertaking MOF Ministry of Finance<br />

CR Central <strong>Railway</strong> MOR Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />

CST Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus <strong>Mumbai</strong> MOU Memorandum of Understanding<br />

DC Direct Current MPC Metropolitan Planning Committee<br />

DPE Department of Public Enterprises MRVC <strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong><br />

EA Environment Assessment MUTP <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project<br />

EMP Environmental Management Plan MUTP-2A <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project - 2A<br />

EMU Electric Multiple Unit NCB National Competitive Bidding<br />

FA&CAO Financial Advisor and Chief Account Officer PAD Project Appraisal <strong>Document</strong><br />

FM Financial Management PDO Project Development Objective<br />

GAAP Governance and Accountability Plan PIO Public Information Officer<br />

GHG Greenhouse Gas R&R Resettlement and Rehabilitation<br />

GOI Government of India RAP Resettlement Action Plan<br />

GOM Government of Maharashtra RDSO Research Design and Standards Organization<br />

GPS Global Positioning System RSPM Respirable Particulate Matter<br />

HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus RTI Right to Information Act<br />

ICB International Competitive Bidding SAO Senior Accounts Officer<br />

ICF Integral Coach Factory SBDs Standard Bidding <strong>Document</strong>s<br />

IGBT Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor SMF Social Management Framework<br />

IR Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s tCO2e Ton CO 2 equivalent<br />

ISO International Org for Standardization TSS Traction Sub-Stations<br />

IT Information Technology WR Western <strong>Railway</strong><br />

IUFRs Interim Unaudited Financial Report<br />

Vice President: Isabel M. Guerrero<br />

Country Director: N. Roberto Zagha<br />

Sector Manager: Michel Audigé<br />

Task Team Leader: Hubert Nove-Josserand<br />

ii


INDIA<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

CONTENTS<br />

Page<br />

I. STRATEGIC CONTEXT AND RATIONALE ................................................................. 1<br />

A. Country and Sector Issues ................................................................................................... 1<br />

B. Rationale for <strong>Bank</strong> involvement ......................................................................................... 2<br />

C. Higher-Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes ................................................ 3<br />

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 3<br />

A. Lending Instrument ............................................................................................................. 3<br />

B. Project Development Objective and Key Indicators ........................................................... 3<br />

C. Project Components ............................................................................................................ 4<br />

D. Alternatives Considered and Reasons for Rejection ........................................................... 7<br />

III. IMPLEMENTATION ...................................................................................................... 8<br />

A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements ................................................................ 8<br />

B. Monitoring and Evaluation of Outcomes/Results ............................................................... 9<br />

C. Sustainability....................................................................................................................... 9<br />

D. Critical Risks and Possible Controversial Aspects ........................................................... 10<br />

E. Loan conditions and covenants ......................................................................................... 11<br />

IV. APPRAISAL SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 12<br />

A. Economic and financial analyses ...................................................................................... 12<br />

B. Technical ........................................................................................................................... 13<br />

C. Fiduciary ........................................................................................................................... 13<br />

D. Social................................................................................................................................. 15<br />

E. Environment ...................................................................................................................... 16<br />

F. Safeguard policies ............................................................................................................. 17<br />

G. Policy Exceptions and Readiness...................................................................................... 18<br />

Annex 1: Country and Sector or Program Background ......................................................... 19<br />

Annex 2: Major Related Projects Financed by the <strong>Bank</strong> and/or other Agencies ................. 31<br />

iii


Annex 3: Results Framework and Monitoring ........................................................................ 33<br />

Annex 4: Detailed Project Description ...................................................................................... 36<br />

Annex 5: Project Costs ............................................................................................................... 42<br />

Annex 6: Implementation Arrangements ................................................................................. 44<br />

Annex 6A: Governance and Accountability Action Plan (GAAP)......................................... 49<br />

Annex 6 B: Supervision Strategy Matrix .................................................................................. 57<br />

Annex 7: Financial Management and Disbursement Arrangements ..................................... 59<br />

Annex 8: Procurement Arrangements ...................................................................................... 75<br />

Annex 9: Economic and Financial Analysis ............................................................................. 84<br />

Annex 10: Safeguard Policy Issues ............................................................................................ 96<br />

Annex 11: Project Preparation and Supervision ................................................................... 102<br />

Annex 12: <strong>Document</strong>s in the Project File ............................................................................... 103<br />

Annex 13: Statement of Loans and Credits ............................................................................ 104<br />

Annex 14: Country at a Glance ............................................................................................... 108<br />

Annex 15: Maps......................................................................................................................... 110<br />

iv


INDIA<br />

MUMBAI URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT - 2A<br />

PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT<br />

SOUTH ASIA<br />

SASDT<br />

Date: June 2, 1010<br />

Country Director: Roberto Zagha<br />

Sector Manager/Director: Michel Audigé<br />

Project ID: P113028<br />

Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan<br />

Team Leader: Hubert Nove-Josserand<br />

Sectors: <strong>Railway</strong>s (100%)<br />

Themes: Other urban development (100%)<br />

Environmental category: Partial Assessment<br />

Project Financing Data<br />

[X] Loan [ ] Credit [ ] Grant [ ] Guarantee [ ] Other:<br />

For Loans/Credits/Others: None<br />

Total <strong>Bank</strong> financing (US$m.): 430.00<br />

Proposed terms: Standard IBRD terms with a maturity of 30 years and a grace period of five<br />

years.<br />

Financing Plan (US$m)<br />

Source Local Foreign Total<br />

Borrower 540.50 0.00 540.50<br />

International <strong>Bank</strong> for Reconstruction and 276.20 153.80 430.00<br />

Development<br />

Financing Gap 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

Total: 816.70 153.80 970.50<br />

Borrower:<br />

Republic of India<br />

India<br />

Responsible Agency:<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> Limited<br />

2nd Floor, Churchgate Station Building<br />

Churchgate, <strong>Mumbai</strong>, India 400 020<br />

Tel: (91-22) 2208-0015 Fax: (91-22) 2209-6972<br />

md@mrvc.gov.in, commrvc@vsnl.net<br />

v


Estimated disbursements (<strong>Bank</strong> FY/US$m)<br />

FY 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015<br />

Annual 3 19 74 130 127 77<br />

Cumulative 3 22 96 226 353 430<br />

Project implementation period: Start January 31, 2010 End: June 15, 2015<br />

Expected effectiveness date: September 15, 2010<br />

Expected closing date: June 15, 2015<br />

Does the project depart from the CAS in content or other significant respects<br />

Ref. PAD I.C.<br />

Does the project require any exceptions from <strong>Bank</strong> policies<br />

Ref. PAD IV.G.<br />

Have these been approved by <strong>Bank</strong> management<br />

Is approval for any policy exception sought from the Board<br />

Does the project include any critical risks rated “substantial” or “high”<br />

Ref. PAD III.E.<br />

Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for implementation<br />

Ref. PAD IV.G.<br />

[ ]Yes [X ] No<br />

[ ]Yes [X] No<br />

[ ]Yes [ ] No<br />

[ ]Yes [X] No<br />

[ ]Yes [X] No<br />

[ X ]Yes [ ] No<br />

Project development objective Ref. PAD II.C., Technical Annex 3<br />

To improve the passenger carrying capacity, operational efficiency, level of comfort of, and the<br />

institutional capacity of entities involved in, the suburban rail system of <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan<br />

area.<br />

Project description Ref. PAD II.D., Technical Annex 4<br />

Component 1: Rolling stock fleet increase with procurement of 864 EMU cars.<br />

Component 2: Conversion of electric traction system from 1500V DC to 25kV AC on the<br />

Central <strong>Railway</strong>, with signal and telecom system improvements.<br />

Component 3: Maintenance facilities and stabling lines to accommodate the additional trains.<br />

Component 4: Capacity Strengthening and Technical assistance.<br />

Which safeguard policies are triggered, if any Ref. PAD IV.F., Technical Annex 10<br />

Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01)<br />

Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12)<br />

Significant, non-standard conditions, if any, for:<br />

Ref. PAD III.F.<br />

Loan/credit effectiveness:<br />

The Additional Conditions of Effectiveness consist of the following: the SFA and the MOU with<br />

the ICF have been executed.<br />

vi


I. STRATEGIC CONTEXT AND RATIONALE<br />

A. Country and Sector Issues<br />

1. India is on a high economic growth path. Its urban population has also been<br />

increasing, faster than its total population, and urbanization in India is projected to reach 41<br />

percent by 2030. Infrastructure development in most Indian cities is insufficient and is not<br />

keeping pace with the increase in travel demand. As a direct consequence, congestion on roads<br />

increases travel time as speeds decrease. Meeting the demand is also a challenge for the railways<br />

across the country. The <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region (MMR) is one of the world’s largest cities,<br />

with a population of 18 million as per the 2001 census. Within the next 25 years, the MMR is<br />

projected to overtake Tokyo to become the largest city in the world, in a country having one of<br />

the fastest growing economies. <strong>Mumbai</strong>, as India’s financial and commercial capital and its most<br />

prominent gateway to the country, occupies the top position in terms of its contribution to the all-<br />

India GDP.<br />

2. The region faces enormous challenges, one of which is the acute inadequacy of its<br />

transport infrastructure. The suburban rail system is the lifeline of <strong>Mumbai</strong>, carrying more than<br />

half of all motorized trips. In 2007-08 an estimated 6.8 million passengers daily (2.5 billion trips<br />

annually) travelled on the suburban railway. At peak hour the average frequency for train<br />

services was a very reasonable 16 trains per hour. Because of its extensive reach across the<br />

metropolitan region and its intensive use by the local population, commuters are subjected to one<br />

of the most severe overcrowding conditions in the world, with a density of up to 16 people per<br />

square meter in the coaches. In addition to overcrowding in the trains, trespassing on the rail<br />

lines is a major cause of accidents, many of them fatal. Death of squatters and trespassers being<br />

struck by a train and passengers falling off trains are a daily occurrence, with 10-12 fatalities per<br />

day. Furthermore, the rapid pace of urbanization and probable acceleration of car ownership and<br />

use in <strong>Mumbai</strong> present a threat to ambient air quality, already a major health issue in most Indian<br />

cities. In <strong>Mumbai</strong> the main contributor to air pollution is the transport sector, so developing<br />

suburban rail use contributes to the efforts being made, in India as well as in other countries, to<br />

reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The present traffic condition of rail commuters is<br />

incompatible with the objectives of <strong>Mumbai</strong> to become a world-class city with acceptable levels<br />

of comfort, convenience, safety and air quality.<br />

3. In early 2000, the Government of Maharashtra state (GOM) and Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />

(IR) launched preparation of the first <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project (MUTP-1) 1 , which has<br />

been implemented since 2002 with the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>’s help and is still under way. By March<br />

2010, 84 new twelve-car electric multiple units (EMU) trains had been put into service, 51 of<br />

which were financed from the <strong>Bank</strong> loan and 33 were financed internally by IR. (Previously<br />

rakes were all of nine cars.) This has reduced crowding in the system from 500 people per coach<br />

ppdpk (persons in peak direction at peak) to 450, despite a net increase in passengers. It is<br />

expected that once all additional 72 twelve-car rakes financed under that project are in service,<br />

crowding will be further reduced to 350 ppdpk, i.e. 30 percent less than the original density --but<br />

still twice the rated carrying capacity.<br />

1 The on-going <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project, usually referred to as MUTP, is referred to in this document as<br />

MUTP-1 to distinguish it from the Second Project.<br />

1


4. As demand continues to grow, yet more capacity will be needed. A comprehensive<br />

transport study for the <strong>Mumbai</strong> region, called TranSforM, carried out under MUTP-1,<br />

recommended this as a priority, in recognition of suburban rail’s dominant role in the region’s<br />

transport network. Suburban rail’s importance is reflected in the size of the planned investment –<br />

Rs.315 billion ($7 billion) by 2031, the Region’s second largest investment after the metro.<br />

5. The proposed <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A (known and referred to in this<br />

document as MUTP-2A) is part of this priority program for developing suburban rail. It will be<br />

complemented by another domestically-funded project known as MUTP-2B, already approved<br />

by the Government of India (GOI) and also part of the priority program, which will further<br />

increase the transport capacity of the suburban rail system by adding tracks. MUTP-2B requires<br />

land acquisition and its implementation will take longer than MUTP-2A.<br />

B. Rationale for <strong>Bank</strong> involvement<br />

6. In continuation of MUTP-1, the proposed increase in suburban rail capacity will<br />

bring important local benefits, reducing commuting times and increasing comfort for a large<br />

segment of <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s population, especially among its poor. The project will allow more<br />

frequent services, cutting waiting time, while higher maximum speeds will cut trip time. The low<br />

fare policy of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail system makes this mode of transport cheaper than the<br />

bus and particularly attractive to less affluent commuters.<br />

7. As part of this second project, traction voltage will be upped from 1,500 V DC to<br />

25 KV AC, reducing energy losses in distribution. The improved rolling stock supplied under<br />

MUTP-2A will further reduce energy consumption, cutting it over all by about 30 percent<br />

compared to the present system. This in turn will contribute to mitigating the climate change<br />

threat originating from transport.<br />

8. This second project will also continue the capacity building effort started by the<br />

<strong>Bank</strong> team during first project. Throughout the implementation of MUTP-1 the project<br />

implementation company, <strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> (MRVC) has gained requisite<br />

expertise in managing a challenging suburban rail development project that required professional<br />

expertise in technical disciplines, as well as in interagency coordination and communication.<br />

This follow-on project will help MRVC in furthering its professional competency and assist it to<br />

plan and design more complex projects involving multi-modal stations.<br />

9. Building on the progress made under MUTP-1, the zonal railways, Central<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> (CR) and Western <strong>Railway</strong> (WR), want to address remaining challenges, in particular to<br />

reduce the high number of fatalities related to trespassing and to improve the environmental<br />

management side of their operation. The successful partnership between GOM and IR for the<br />

development of suburban rail services in the <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region has been recognized<br />

by the railways. In its Vision 2020 strategic plan the Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s wishes to develop this<br />

type of partnership for suburban rail services across the country and make the management of<br />

suburban operations more efficient. This will include addressing the issue of the growing<br />

financial deficits of such services. Through specific studies as well as study tours, this MUTP-2A<br />

project will help develop the analytical knowledge basis to address these challenges and set up<br />

these organizational changes.<br />

2


C. Higher-Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes<br />

10. The proposed project is designed to support the Long-term Transportation Strategy for<br />

the <strong>Mumbai</strong> metropolitan region (TranSforM), whose vision is “Transforming <strong>Mumbai</strong> into a<br />

world class metropolis with a vibrant economy and globally comparable quality of life for its<br />

citizens”. In addition, the project supports IR’s Vision 2020, which aims to remove bottlenecks<br />

and augment capacity to match the growing transportation demand and provide comfort and<br />

convenience in every activity.<br />

11. The project supports the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>’s Country Strategy for India (FY2009-12), which<br />

emphasizes rapid and inclusive growth, sustainable development, and improving government’s<br />

effectiveness in delivering services. Continuation of the <strong>Bank</strong>’s involvement in India’s suburban<br />

sector through MUTP-2A, with its mix of growth-oriented investments and capacity building,<br />

will help India to develop a collaborative approach between the local governments and IR,<br />

towards a more efficient suburban railway system, as befits a middle- income state.<br />

12. The <strong>Bank</strong> is engaged in consultations with IR for developing a longer-term Plan 2030<br />

that would address the challenges that the <strong>Railway</strong>s face. These derive from India’s expected<br />

continued rapid economic growth over the next two decades, the expected changes in the<br />

expectation of customers, and the continuing transition to urban life. In parallel with other <strong>Bank</strong>funded<br />

activities such as the Dedicated Freight Corridor Project under preparation and nonlending<br />

technical assistance activities (workshops and study tours), the MUTP-2A project will<br />

support the preparation of this strategic plan as it applies to suburban areas, in particular through<br />

a provision in the loan for further technical assistance.<br />

13. The project supports environmentally friendly urban public transportation, which is<br />

recommended in the <strong>Bank</strong>’s sector strategy: “Safe, Affordable and Clean Transport”. Rail is one<br />

of the most energy-efficient modes of transportation and therefore a direct contributor to cutting<br />

GHG emissions, which are widely held responsible for climate change. It even compares well to<br />

other modes of public transport. Buses in India emit about 28 grams of CO 2 per passenger-km,<br />

whereas railways are about 2.5 times more efficient, emitting only about ten grams. The project<br />

will help promote the use of this more efficient and climate- friendly mode of public transport.<br />

Within its design, the project will support activities that further cut GHG emissions, such as<br />

regenerative braking for EMUs and conversion of the power supply from DC to AC. An<br />

additional benefit is the local impact on public health from the reduction in pollutants.<br />

II.<br />

PROJECT DESCRIPTION<br />

A. Lending Instrument<br />

14. The lending instrument to be used for this project is an IBRD Specific Investment<br />

Loan (SIL).<br />

B. Project Development Objective and Key Indicators<br />

15. The proposed project will build upon the progress made under the first <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />

Urban Transport Project and will further increase the capacity of the suburban rail system within<br />

3


the <strong>Mumbai</strong> metropolitan region. The project’s development objective is to improve the<br />

passenger carrying capacity, operational efficiency, level of comfort of, and the institutional<br />

capacity of entities involved in, the suburban rail system of <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan area.<br />

Accordingly its performance will be monitored through the following indicators:<br />

(a) additional capacity in vehicle-km during peak hours,<br />

(b) reduction in peak hour overcrowding,<br />

(c) reduction in journey times,<br />

(d) operational efficiency: reduction in energy consumption, and<br />

(e) institutional strengthening: carrying out technical assistance and preparing action plans<br />

C. Project Components<br />

16. The project has four components. The first three lead to the introduction of<br />

additional train services on <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s suburban rail network. The technical assistance<br />

component intends to strengthen the institutional and managerial capacity of MRVC and IR.<br />

Table 1 shows the project’s components and cost, as well as its financing. Its total cost is<br />

estimated at US$970.5 million, and the proposed IBRD loan, at 44 percent of the total, will be<br />

US$430 million.<br />

Table 1. Summary of Project Components, Costs and Financing<br />

(US$ million, including contingencies)<br />

Project Component<br />

IBRD<br />

Loan<br />

Counterpart<br />

Funding<br />

Total<br />

Cost<br />

Component 1<br />

Rolling Stock Fleet Increase 355.7 303.9 659.6<br />

Component 2<br />

DC to AC Conversion 55.2 118.6 173.8<br />

Component 3<br />

EMU Maintenance Facilities and Stabling Lines 0 117.7 117.7<br />

Component 4<br />

Technical Assistance 14.4 0.2 14.6<br />

Front-end Fee 1.075 - 1.075<br />

Unallocated 3.7 - 3.7<br />

Total Financing Sought 430.0 540.5 970.5<br />

Note: Physical and price contingencies are all included<br />

Component 1. EMU Rolling Stock Fleet Increase<br />

17. Under the project 864 additional EMU cars will be procured. This will increase the<br />

total fleet to around 3,124 cars. The <strong>Bank</strong> loan will finance the electrical equipment for the new<br />

cars, to be manufactured at Chennai Integral Coach Factory (ICF), while counterpart funds will<br />

cover the remaining costs of production. This continues the arrangement adopted under MUTP-<br />

1. As the power supply will be converted from DC to AC before these cars enter service, they<br />

4


will be designed and built for use on 25KV AC system only. This activity is expected to be<br />

completed by 2014-15.<br />

Component 2. Conversion of Power Supply from Direct Current to Alternating Current<br />

(including Improvements to Signals and Telecoms)<br />

18. Three sections of the MMR’s Central <strong>Railway</strong> network will be converted from<br />

1,500V DC traction to 25KV AC. This activity comprises (i) modifying overhead catenaries, (ii)<br />

installing power sub-stations, along with switching stations (iii) procuring catenary maintenance<br />

equipment; and (iv) modifying signal and telecom systems. This investment is needed to allow<br />

the operation of the increased fleet as a result of Component 1.<br />

19. The conversion is planned to be completed by 2012-13. In addition to creating<br />

capacity to run more trains, the conversion will cut transmission losses and reduce the need for<br />

maintenance of power supply installations. Regeneration of electricity during braking is more<br />

efficient under high-voltage systems, so this will add a third source of energy savings.<br />

Component 3. EMU Maintenance Facilities and Stabling Lines<br />

20. New stabling lines will be built to accommodate the additional trains supplied<br />

under the project. The existing EMU maintenance depot at Kurla on the Central <strong>Railway</strong> and the<br />

maintenance shed at Virar built under MUTP-1 will accommodate the new stabling lines. No<br />

new car maintenance shed or overhaul workshop is planned under MUTP-2A. In total, 73 new<br />

stabling lines will be built: 34 (including four extensions from 9-car to 12-car) on the Western<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> and 39 on the Central <strong>Railway</strong>. They will be fully funded by the government.<br />

Component 4. Capacity Strengthening and Technical Assistance<br />

21. Strategic and tactical studies will be carried out, as well as capacity building and<br />

training. This represents 1.5 percent of the total project cost.<br />

22. The strategic studies will include: (i) preparation of a priority development<br />

program for the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail services, consistent with the TranSforM Study and<br />

including pre-feasibility studies; (ii) support to IR in the development of their long-term strategy<br />

to implement Vision 2020, in particular for the suburban rail services; and (iii) a study to<br />

improve the financial situation of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail operation, mostly by maximizing<br />

non fare-box revenues.<br />

23. Tactical studies include the following: (i) a ticketing study aiming at establishing a<br />

more efficient and user-friendly ticketing system for <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s suburban rail system; (ii) study<br />

and design of an improved passenger information system for the system; (iii) a study to reduce<br />

the number of accidents due to trespassing, and (iv) a study to identify specific improvements to<br />

environmental practices within the operations of the Central and Western <strong>Railway</strong>s.<br />

24. Capacity building will include supply and installation of software for improved<br />

power supply and operation simulation. Training will aim at reinforcing the professional<br />

efficiency of MRVC officers on the basis of an approved training plan.<br />

Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design<br />

5


25. The on-going MUTP-1 project has made significant progress towards achieving<br />

its development objectives with a noted reduction in overcrowding in suburban trains and<br />

operation of new buses of improved design. The MMR Development Authority (MMRDA) has<br />

improved its capacity to manage resettlement and rehabilitation that is now implemented with<br />

reasonable quality. But land acquisition and resettlement and rehabilitation are still slow, as is<br />

road construction.<br />

26. The design of MUTP-2A builds on the following key lessons learned from the<br />

implementation of MUTP-1 and other transport operations in India.<br />

27. Motivation, ownership, effective implementation planning and sustained followup<br />

on the part of the client is an important factor in implementation success. MRVC, which<br />

started off as a new entity has in course of implementing MUTP-1 developed management<br />

experience, expertise in <strong>Bank</strong>-assisted operations and capacity to liaise with the several<br />

departments and agencies of IR 2 , GOM, and other stakeholders for implementing the project’s<br />

suburban rail component. This experience has given MRVC the required understanding and<br />

confidence to implement a new externally-funded project on its own in coordination with other<br />

institutions and agencies.<br />

28. The project should be designed in a way that inter-agency coordination does not<br />

become an obstacle to carrying out key activities. One of the key reasons explaining the slow<br />

pace of MUTP-1’s implementation was the complex project design with ambitious<br />

implementation arrangements, involving multiple implementing agencies without effective<br />

coordination. Five project implementing agencies were involved, with MMRDA as the<br />

coordinator. It would have benefitted from a clearer contractual co-ordination framework to<br />

ensure effective progress. Long delays in project components such as station area improvement<br />

schemes and road-over-bridges, requiring greater inter-agency coordination, forced the removal<br />

of these sub-projects from MUTP-1 as part of a project restructuring. To minimize such delays<br />

on account of weak co-operation and ineffective inter-agency coordination, MUTP-2A has been<br />

designed as a simple but comprehensive project for enhancing the quality and magnitude of the<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail operations, through activities that will involve essentially IR agencies<br />

coordinated by MRVC. Implementation arrangements for MUTP-2A have been planned in such<br />

a way that progress will not be vulnerable to poor inter-agency coordination.<br />

29. Project design should adequately focus on capacity building of the client,<br />

especially in new areas, and leave space for implementation arrangements to evolve, instead of<br />

being frozen in time, to achieve greater efficiency. The nature and significance of some major<br />

resettlement difficulties were appreciated by the client during the process of implementation.<br />

Through very active <strong>Bank</strong> involvement, MMRDA has gradually evolved a more sustainable and<br />

2 Central <strong>Railway</strong> and Western <strong>Railway</strong> are two of the largest and busiest of the 16 zones of Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s. Their<br />

respective divisions, <strong>Mumbai</strong> Division of the Central <strong>Railway</strong> and <strong>Mumbai</strong> Central Division of the Western<br />

<strong>Railway</strong>, are involved in this project. IR is a department owned and controlled by GOI, via MOR. IR manufactures<br />

much of its rolling stock and heavy engineering components at its six manufacturing plants, called production units,<br />

which are managed directly by the Ministry. Chennai ICF is one of these. Each of the six production units is headed<br />

by a general manager, who reports directly to the <strong>Railway</strong>s Board. The Research Design and Standards Organization<br />

(RDSO) is a research and development organization under MOR, which functions as a technical adviser and<br />

consultant to the <strong>Railway</strong>s Board, the zonal railways, and the railway production units in respect of design and<br />

standardization of railway equipment and problems related to railway construction, operation and maintenance.<br />

6


consultative approach. It developed capacity for managing large-scale and complex resettlement<br />

processes. The present project includes several studies that will help MRVC and IR strengthen<br />

their capacity to address difficult and sensitive challenges, such as the safety of trespassers,<br />

environmental management and financial sustainability.<br />

30. Mechanisms for strengthening transparency, accountability, and good<br />

governance should be planned upstream and integrated into the project design to enhance<br />

implementation quality and outcomes. Successful implementation of social safeguards, the most<br />

challenging issue in MUTP-1, was due to establishing effective institutional mechanisms. These<br />

included an independent monitoring panel for third-party monitoring and a transparent and<br />

accountable grievance redress mechanism for resolving complaints and disputes. Measures for<br />

transparency, accountability, and good governance, including third-party monitoring and dispute<br />

resolution, are incorporated in MUTP-2A as a part of the Governance and Accountability Plan.<br />

31. Urban transport projects undertaken in diverse and challenging metropolitan<br />

settings such as <strong>Mumbai</strong> involve complex political-economy issues. They need to be<br />

anticipated and the project designed accordingly, so that the implementation trajectory<br />

remains well within the reach of the implementing and funding agencies. Factors other than<br />

inter-agency coordination that posed roadblocks in implementation of MUTP-1 included difficult<br />

political economy issues, especially with regard to management of necessary land acquisition,<br />

resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R). MUTP-2A has been carefully designed to avoid land<br />

acquisition and R&R activities. Compared to MUTP-1, which required resettlement of some<br />

19,000 project-affected households, MUTP-2A does not involve any land acquisition, and<br />

squatter households required to be resettled may not exceed twenty.<br />

D. Alternatives Considered and Reasons for Rejection<br />

32. Type of <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> financing: The possibility of treating the project as<br />

additional financing for MUTP-1 instead of a separate project was discussed. However, the<br />

activities planned for MUTP-2A may go beyond three years of the expected closing date of the<br />

on-going loan, the limit allowed by <strong>Bank</strong> policy, so additional financing would not be possible.<br />

Also, the additional financing option would be financially less advantageous for the Borrower. It<br />

was agreed that MUTP-2A should be prepared as a separate project as initially stated.<br />

33. Number of rakes included in the project: Initially the project design included the<br />

procurement of only 60 12-car rakes, the maximum that could be used efficiently on the existing<br />

infrastructure. However, simulation information provided by MRVC showed that it will be<br />

possible to use 72 rakes efficiently on the infrastructure available at the end of MUTP-2A, and<br />

the project has been adjusted to this higher value to further improve the system’s capacity.<br />

34. Number and size of stabling lines: Initially a larger number of stabling lines were<br />

considered to be installed under the project, but they were excluded to minimize land acquisition<br />

and resettlement impacts. The project has been designed in a way that it requires no private land<br />

acquisition and involves no resettlement activities.<br />

7


III.<br />

IMPLEMENTATION<br />

A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements<br />

35. MUTP-2A will continue with the institutional arrangements put in place under<br />

MUTP-1 that proved to be efficient for an effective partnership between the Government of<br />

Maharashtra state and Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s in carrying out the project. MRVC, incorporated under<br />

the Companies Act, 1956, is a Public Sector Undertaking, limited by shares, of the Indian<br />

government under IR. Owned almost equally by GOM and IR, MRVC is expected to coordinate<br />

and implement development projects for the suburban rail system in <strong>Mumbai</strong> on behalf of GOM<br />

and IR. MRVC will receive a fee called Directional and General (D&G) charges from GOM and<br />

IR for its services under MUTP-2A.<br />

36. MRVC is the project implementing agency for MUTP-2A and in that role is<br />

accountable for satisfactory completion of all the project works. MMRDA, ICF, RDSO, WR and<br />

CR are executing agencies. As the project implementing agency, MRVC, on behalf of GOM and<br />

IR, is responsible for financing and procuring all the contracts financed by the loan, including the<br />

rolling stock and power supply equipment, as well as for executing certain identified works in<br />

the field, with due safeguards in consultation with the Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s. Memoranda of<br />

understanding which incorporate insurance to respect the environmental management plan, time<br />

line of works and activities to be carried out by the respective agencies, will be set up between<br />

MRVC and the executing agencies.<br />

37. GOM and IR will share the investment costs of the <strong>Bank</strong>-financed project on a<br />

50/50 basis, making GOM a key beneficiary and stakeholder of the project along with IR. The<br />

project will benefit from this partnership and will seek ways to further deepen it through<br />

technical assistance and capacity building. GOM and IR will ensure that its activities under the<br />

Project are carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Implementation Manual, SMF,<br />

and EMPs, and in accordance with the provisions of the Anti-Corruption Guidelines, and shall<br />

ensure that the Implementation Manual, SMF, and EMPs are not materially revised, amended,<br />

waived, or abrogated without the prior no objection of the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />

38. Flow of Funds and Financial Management: The borrower of the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong><br />

loan will be India, who will make its proceeds available to MOR and GOM. One half of each<br />

loan disbursement will be released to GOM as Additional Central Assistance under the standard<br />

policy of external assistance to a State and to MOR through the General Budget. MOR and GOM<br />

will provide loan and counterpart funds to MRVC. MRVC will be responsible for financial<br />

management arrangements for the project. A recently completed assessment concluded that<br />

MRVC has a financial management system adequate to account for and report on the project<br />

resources and expenditures accurately. The responsibility for overall project financial<br />

management will rest with MRVC’s Director (Finance), who will be responsible for activities<br />

relating to compiling project budgets, project accounting, reporting to the <strong>Bank</strong> in a timely<br />

manner, submitting applications to the <strong>Bank</strong> for direct payments, advances and replenishments<br />

and periodical audits. The project financial management cell will remain adequately staffed<br />

during the implementation of the project.<br />

8


39. Safeguards Management: An environmental management plan (EMP) and a<br />

social management framework (SMF) for the project have been prepared satisfactory to <strong>Bank</strong><br />

which are in line with those approved by the <strong>Bank</strong> for MUTP-1. It is expected that both MRVC<br />

and CR will hire a project management consultant to assist them in implementing the project. In<br />

addition, MRVC has obtained ISO 14001 certification for its environmental management system.<br />

The project’s environmental management plans (EMP will form the basis on which its<br />

performance will be measured. The management representative required by the ISO compliance<br />

system will be the Deputy Chief Engineer. S/he will supervise the consultant hired by MRVC<br />

and co-ordinate with the respective chief engineer of CR to confirm compliance with the relevant<br />

provisions of the EMP. For the contracts to be executed through the participating railways, it has<br />

been agreed that the relevant provisions from the <strong>Railway</strong> Contracts Manual will be enforced and<br />

the necessary instructions to the contractors are to be issued. The project does not involve any<br />

private land acquisition or resettlement impacts. However, MRVC has prepared a Social<br />

Management Framework (SMF) Social management framework referred to in Chapter-3 of the<br />

Project Implementation Manual in order to deal with any LA or R&R in case of any future<br />

alterations in design or layout. MRVC has also reached an understanding with MMRDA that the<br />

latter will implement any future resettlement activities as required on behalf of MRVC as per the<br />

<strong>Bank</strong> approved SMF that is based on the Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R) policy for<br />

MUTP-1. Adverse impacts relating to access, health, safety, and unequal wages are common to<br />

most civil works and will be addressed by the concerned railways’ divisions as part of<br />

construction management, which MRVC will monitor.<br />

B. Monitoring and Evaluation of Outcomes/Results<br />

40. The Results Framework shown in Annex 3 is the main instrument for monitoring<br />

and evaluating achievement of the project developmental objective (PDO) and outcome<br />

indicators. The project’s main outcome indicators, namely additional capacity, peak hour<br />

overcrowding, journey times and energy consumption, will be generated by routine monitoring<br />

by MRVC using ridership/occupancy surveys of commuters and operational statistics, compiled<br />

in yearly reports. This will help in assessing the project’s contribution to enhancing the capacity,<br />

efficiency and financial viability of MMR’s suburban rail transport system and to redirect it, if<br />

necessary, to achieve the PDO. MRVC has provided baseline and end-of-project target values for<br />

the outcome and most of the intermediate performance indicators.<br />

C. Sustainability<br />

41. Since the proposed project intends to reduce overcrowding, the financial<br />

performance of the suburban rail operations is expected to deteriorate in the medium term as a<br />

result, unless revenues increase slightly faster than the cost price index. However, <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s<br />

suburban operations represent a comparatively small share of IR’s total business, so they have<br />

only a minor impact on IR’s overall financial performance, which is far more dependent on<br />

railway-wide tariff policies and continued strong growth in freight traffic. Therefore this<br />

financial condition is not expected to impact significantly the sustainability of the operation and<br />

maintenance of the suburban rail system.<br />

42. MRVC has been given the main mandate to formulate and implement rail<br />

infrastructure projects that require coordination between MOR and GOM. It is funded<br />

9


accordingly by both administrations. However, this does not make MRVC a permanent structure<br />

and MRVC will remain in existence only as long as it is judged necessary beyond the year 2014,<br />

the end of the current MOU. An amendment to the MOU will be signed to ensure that MRVC<br />

continues as implementing agency of MUTP-2A until its completion.<br />

D. Critical Risks and Possible Controversial Aspects<br />

Risks Risk Mitigation Measures Risk Rating with Mitigation Risk Rating<br />

Operation-specific Risks<br />

Technical Design Demand assessment risk: demand may<br />

exceed the forecast, thereby reducing<br />

the expected passenger comfort<br />

benefits (reduced overcrowding). This<br />

can happen because population or<br />

Additional counts will be made during<br />

project preparation and project<br />

implementation to monitor passenger<br />

loadings. The pace of implementation of<br />

the Strategic Transport Plan may be<br />

economic growth does not change as<br />

forecast. It can also happen because<br />

the fare does not rise at the same pace<br />

as the cost escalation index. Based on<br />

recent traffic counts, this risk is<br />

moderate.<br />

revised accordingly.<br />

Moderate<br />

Implementation<br />

Capacity and<br />

Sustainability<br />

Financial<br />

Management<br />

About ten percent of electric motors<br />

have failed in trains so far delivered<br />

under MUTP-1, with a small impact<br />

on operations as the Vendor has<br />

replaced them, but with moderate<br />

future risk.<br />

Financial sustainability: continuation<br />

of the present fare level trend will<br />

increase the financial deficit of the<br />

suburban operation, creating a<br />

medium-term financial risk for IR.<br />

Possibility of certain gaps in corporate<br />

governance and financial<br />

accountability and management<br />

practices in MRVC. (MRVC is in the<br />

process of implementing MUTP-1 and<br />

is already familiar with <strong>Bank</strong><br />

procedures).<br />

The <strong>Bank</strong> team will encourage IR to pay<br />

more attention to qualification of critical<br />

items of rolling stock procurement.<br />

The impact of the project on IR’s financial<br />

performance as a whole is considered small<br />

and not liable to affect significantly the<br />

sustainability of the suburban operations<br />

and maintenance.<br />

An assessment of corporate governance<br />

and financial accountability (CGFA)<br />

arrangements in MRVC has been<br />

completed. The objective of the assessment<br />

is to (i) benchmark current CGFA practices<br />

in MRVC against industry standards and<br />

good practices and (ii) agree on an action<br />

plan with dates for implementing capacity<br />

building measures that are identified.<br />

Progress on the agreed action plan would<br />

be monitored during project preparation<br />

and prior to implementation.<br />

Funds will flow to MRVC through budget<br />

release, which will be replenished by the<br />

<strong>Bank</strong> on the basis of quarterly interim<br />

unaudited financial reports and expenditure<br />

forecasts. Direct payment by the <strong>Bank</strong> to<br />

the suppliers will be the likely option under<br />

the project. The project will comprise only<br />

a few large supply contracts, which will be<br />

subject to prior review by the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />

Low<br />

Low<br />

Moderate<br />

(subject to<br />

progress of<br />

implementati<br />

on of agreed<br />

CGFA action<br />

plan<br />

10


Procurement<br />

Social and<br />

Environmental<br />

Safeguards<br />

Use of the <strong>Bank</strong>’s revised standard<br />

bidding documents may require an<br />

initial familiarization period, which<br />

may result in delays in finalizing<br />

contract awards.<br />

Since all procurement packages are<br />

large values, there is likelihood of<br />

delay in decision making, generally<br />

for all packages that involve RDSO as<br />

the design organization with mandate<br />

to clear the specifications and<br />

particularly for procurement of EMU<br />

rolling stock, as clearances will be<br />

required at the <strong>Railway</strong> Board/GOI<br />

levels.<br />

There are no substantial risks in this<br />

project associated with social and<br />

environmental impacts. All physical<br />

activities are located within the<br />

existing railway lands and involve no<br />

land acquisition or resettlement<br />

impacts. (a) However, stabling lines<br />

proposed at Virar Scrap yard may<br />

pose hazard risks for people living in<br />

hutments outside the execution area<br />

but near the railway racks.<br />

(b) Any alteration the project design<br />

may require LA and R&R measures.<br />

<strong>Bank</strong> staff will guide MRVC staff in<br />

under-standing the various changes and<br />

their import, even during the period of<br />

issue and receipt of bidding documents,<br />

and clarify doubts at all stages, to avoid<br />

long delays.<br />

The team will discuss and agree on<br />

arrangements that will be worked out with<br />

RDSO and the <strong>Railway</strong> Board to<br />

participate early on during the bidding and<br />

later evaluation process of these<br />

procurements.<br />

(a) MRVC carried out a supplementary<br />

social impact assessment survey in order to<br />

reconfirm the nature and magnitude of<br />

adverse impacts on a few households living<br />

alongside the rail tracks leading to the<br />

proposed stabling lines site at the Virar<br />

Scrap Yard. The study confirmed that there<br />

is no LA or R&R impacts. In order to<br />

address the safety issues, <strong>Railway</strong>s will<br />

barricade the whole stretch from the rail<br />

tracks and the stabling site.<br />

(b) MRVC has prepared a SMF acceptable<br />

to the <strong>Bank</strong>, based on the R&R Policy<br />

approved for the ongoing MUTP-1 to deal<br />

with any LA or R&R impacts caused due<br />

to any alteration in design or outlay. In<br />

continuation of the arrangements<br />

established for MUTP-1, MRVC will carry<br />

out any necessary LA through the state<br />

government whereas R&R measures will<br />

be implemented by MMRDA on behalf of<br />

MRVC. Adverse impacts relating to<br />

access, health, safety, and unequal wages<br />

are common to most civil works and will<br />

be addressed by the concerned railway<br />

divisions as part of construction<br />

management, which MRVC will monitor.<br />

Low<br />

Moderate<br />

Moderate<br />

Overall risk (including reputational risks)<br />

Moderate<br />

E. Loan conditions and covenants<br />

43. Conditions of Effectiveness: Subsidiary financing agreement between MRVC and<br />

GOM and the MOU between MRVC and the ICF have been executed.<br />

11


IV.<br />

APPRAISAL SUMMARY<br />

A. Economic and financial analyses<br />

44. Economic analysis: Since this project is a continuation of the earlier MUTP-1<br />

project, the economic analysis for this project has been conducted comparing the proposed<br />

additional project components as the ‘with’ alternative against the situation at the end of MUTP-<br />

1 as the ‘without’ alternative.<br />

45. The analysis has been carried out of the project’s incremental costs and benefits.<br />

The economic analysis for the suburban rail component done at the stage of MUTP-1 has been<br />

updated to current prices. The assumptions have been modified after comparing the results of the<br />

earlier analysis with the actual outputs for traffic, average trip length, increase in other traffic<br />

(passengers and freight), procurement of rakes and the cost of various components. The revised<br />

assumptions were then used to add the proposed components (MUTP-2A) and their costs to<br />

estimate the total benefits of the whole project. The difference in costs and benefits for MUTP-1,<br />

‘with’ and ‘without’ MUTP-2A were computed to arrive at the economic rate of return for the<br />

proposed component.<br />

46. The evaluation shows that the project will have an economic rate of return of 17<br />

percent and net present value, discounted to 2010, of US$262 million in 2008 prices at a 12<br />

percent discount rate over a thirty-five-year evaluation period (2010 to 2045). The above results<br />

indicate that the project is very viable economically and the <strong>Mumbai</strong> city will gain from the<br />

better suburban system, the lifeline for commuter transport in the city. Detailed analysis is<br />

provided in Annex 9.<br />

47. Financial analysis: MRVC has made financial projections of the <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />

suburban system over a 35-year period, based on 2008-09, and related them to the overall<br />

financial performance of IR. It took into account the impact of both the on-going MUTP-1<br />

(assumed to be completed in 2010-11) and MUTP-2A (assumed to be completed in 2014-15). A<br />

Base Case analysis was undertaken, as well as sensitivity analyses for the key assumptions. The<br />

model was originally developed as part of the Financial and Institutional Study of the <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />

Suburban System in 1996 and has since been used regularly to forecast demand, earnings and<br />

operating expenses, generally performing well.<br />

48. In 2008-09, the <strong>Mumbai</strong> system represented an estimated 12 percent of IR’s<br />

passenger traffic (measured in passenger-km) and about seven percent of IR’s total traffic<br />

including freight. However, because of the very high average loads carried and the low average<br />

fare, it only generated about 1.5 percent of IR’s total revenue and about two percent of its total<br />

working expenses (excluding depreciation). Because MUTP-2A will reduce over-crowding and<br />

thus require more assets and services to carry the same volume of traffic, its financial<br />

performance is likely to deteriorate for at least the medium-term. However, its comparatively<br />

small share of the total IR business means that it will have only a minor impact on the financial<br />

performance of IR as a whole, which is far more dependent on railway-wide tariff policies and<br />

continued strong growth in freight traffic. Detailed financial analysis is given in Annex 9.<br />

12


B. Technical<br />

49. During MUTP-2A it is expected that the same signaling and telecom technology<br />

will be used as existed during MUTP-1, i.e. digital axle counters, both compatible with AC<br />

traction. The technical specification for the EMU cars was the subject of extensive discussion<br />

with IR during the preparation of MUTP-1. Two separate independent reviews were undertaken,<br />

one commissioned by IR, the other by the <strong>Bank</strong>. These confirmed that the specifications were<br />

appropriate for the particular conditions in <strong>Mumbai</strong> (very heavy passenger loadings and difficult<br />

operating conditions during the monsoon season) and are in line with current international trends.<br />

50. The new EMU coaches will be provided with (i) “state-of-the-art” 3-phase<br />

“Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) based” AC traction technology with improved energy<br />

efficiency and reliability, (ii) maintenance-free, higher horse-power (30 percent) 3-phase AC<br />

traction motors with Variable Voltage Variable Frequency control, (iii) a GPS-based<br />

microprocessor-controlled passenger information system, (iv) higher acceleration and<br />

deceleration of 0.54 m/s/s and 0.76 m/s/s respectively, with a maximum speed of 100 km/hr, (v)<br />

a forced air ventilation system to maintain the difference in CO 2 level between the inside and<br />

outside of the coach within 700 ppm as per international standards, (vi) air-conditioned driver’s<br />

cab and provision of capacity for power supply for air conditioning of passenger areas of the<br />

EMUs as a retrofit at a later date, and (vii) air springs in secondary suspension for better riding<br />

quality.<br />

C. Fiduciary<br />

51. Financial management (FM): The design of the FM arrangements for the proposed<br />

project builds on the following strength in the area of financial management of MUTP-1: a<br />

budgeting, accounting and reporting system has been operational in the entity for the past several<br />

years, which will be used for accounting and generating the required financial reports under<br />

MUTP-2A. MRVC has prior experience in implementing <strong>Bank</strong> financed project (MUTP-1) and<br />

its FM policies and procedures are being further strengthened for implementing MUTP-2A.<br />

52. Disbursement arrangements: The project will be funded through budget releases to<br />

MRVC by MOR and GOM as in the case of MUTP-1. Separate budget codes will be established<br />

for the purpose by MRVC. The IBRD funds will flow to MOR (through the general budget) and<br />

GOM (through Additional Central Assistance) from the GOI’s Office of Aid, Audit and<br />

Accounts. The repayment of the loan will be done by GOI/GOM in equal parts and the surcharge<br />

already levied on suburban commuters will contribute to this repayment fund. Of the total<br />

surcharge collected 50 percent will be transferred to MOR by CR and WR and the remaining 50<br />

percent will be transferred to GOM or adjusted against GOM receivables by MRVC. IBRD will<br />

advance an amount equivalent to six months’ forecast expenditure, to be deposited in the<br />

Designated Account that will be opened by the Ministry of Finance. Subsequent disbursements<br />

by the <strong>Bank</strong> will be routed through the Designated Account. Disbursements by IBRD will be<br />

made on the basis of the quarterly interim unaudited financial reports submitted by MRVC.<br />

Supporting documentation, including completion reports, certifications, bills and other<br />

documentation will be retained by MRVC and made available to the <strong>Bank</strong> during project<br />

supervision. These will also be audited as a part of the annual audit of project financial<br />

statements. Retroactive financing will be available under the project for payments made within<br />

13


12 months prior to the expected date of the loan agreement and to be eligible, the activities<br />

should be procured as per <strong>Bank</strong> guidelines on procurement.<br />

53. External Audit: As per Section 619(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, MRVC’s<br />

statutory auditors will be appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) to carry out<br />

an independent audit and express their opinion as per the requirements of the Companies Act. In<br />

addition, the CAG through its Principal Director of Commercial Audit may also conduct<br />

supplementary audits under Section 619 (3)(b) of the Companies Act on the audited financial<br />

statements. After the completion of the statutory audit and supplementary audit, the audited<br />

accounts and auditors’ reports are adopted by MRVC’s Annual General Meeting. Statutory<br />

audits of MRVC are on schedule. They do not contain any material observations. In addition to<br />

the audits under the Companies Act, MRVC is subject to proprietary audit/ inspection by the<br />

Office of the Principal Director of Commercial Audit.<br />

54. Procurement: Procurement under the project will be carried out by MRVC. MOR<br />

has implemented several <strong>Bank</strong>-funded projects aimed at modernizing India’s railways.<br />

Generally the officers are aware of the procurement procedures followed in these projects.<br />

MRVC will depute some representatives who will deal with this procurement, to the training<br />

programs organized by Administrative Staff College of India, the National Institute of Financial<br />

Management or other reputable institute for updating their knowledge on procurement.<br />

55. MRVC has been delegated authority by IR to make procurement decisions for<br />

contracts up to a value of Rs. 1,000 million (about US$20 million). All contracts except the one<br />

for the procurement of EMUs electric equipments will be within this threshold. The value of the<br />

EMU contract is expected to be over US$20 million. In this case, the bid evaluation will be<br />

carried out by a committee of MRVC and RDSO and forwarded to Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s Board for<br />

review and approval of recommendations. MRVC and IR have agreed on a timetable for<br />

completing the various stages of bid evaluation and award of contract, to ensure that the contract<br />

is awarded within 150 days of bid opening.<br />

56. The agency is staffed by qualified technical personnel and managers, well versed<br />

in the project’s technical aspects. Some of the officials have undergone training in <strong>Bank</strong><br />

procurement and most of the officers have handled procurement under <strong>Bank</strong>-funded projects.<br />

Considering that MRVC has implemented the on-going MUTP-1 successfully, fresh assessment<br />

of the capacity of MRVC to carry out procurement for the project has not been considered<br />

essential and not done formally. However, based on the experience of the staff engaged in the<br />

first project and little change in the organizational structure for implementing the second project,<br />

the <strong>Bank</strong> team concludes that the agency has adequate capacity to handle procurement under this<br />

project. The procurement risk is assessed as ‘moderate’ in view of the large packages proposed<br />

and considering the possibility of delays due to involvement of several agencies in the decisionmaking<br />

process.<br />

57. Procurement for the proposed project will be carried out in accordance with the<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>’s "Guidelines: Procurement under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits" dated May 2004<br />

revised in October 2006; and "Guidelines: Selection and Employment of Consultants by <strong>World</strong><br />

<strong>Bank</strong> Borrowers" dated May 2004 revised in October 2006, and the provisions stipulated in the<br />

loan agreement. The various items under different expenditure categories are described in<br />

14


general in Annex 8. For each contract to be financed by the loan, the different procurement<br />

methods or consultant selection methods, the need for pre-qualification, estimated costs, prior<br />

review requirements, and time frame have been agreed between the Borrower and the <strong>Bank</strong> in<br />

the Procurement Plan. This Plan will be updated at least annually or as required to reflect the<br />

actual project implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity.<br />

D. Social<br />

58. Potential social risks: The project with its current design and outlay involves no<br />

involuntary resettlement impacts with the proposed activities of stabling lines, traction substations,<br />

section and sub-section posts and maintenance facilities requiring no land acquisition.<br />

The stabling lines will be built over about 28 ha of railway land, only along existing railway<br />

tracks. All other facilities, where choice of location can be flexible, have been planned to be<br />

developed on vacant plots available with the <strong>Railway</strong>s. Thus, MRVC has carefully explored<br />

various alternatives and has ensured that no private lands will need to be acquired, in order to<br />

avoid and minimize adverse social impacts. A supplementary social impact survey was<br />

undertaken by MRVC at Virar Scrap Yard to assess the likely impact on 38 structures located<br />

close to railway tracks. The survey confirmed that no land acquisition or resettlement measure<br />

was required.<br />

59. In order to deal with any future involuntary resettlement impacts due to any<br />

possible alteration in design or outlay, MRVC has prepared and adopted a social management<br />

framework (SMF) detailed under the MUTP R&R Policy, which was adopted for the ongoing<br />

MUTP-1 and is satisfactory to the <strong>Bank</strong>. The SMF is referred to in the Chapter-3 of the Project<br />

Implementation Manual, which also provides that any necessary resettlement and rehabilitation<br />

(R&R) measures will be carried out by MMRDA on behalf of MRVC. In such an event, MRVC<br />

will prepare a specific resettlement action plan (RAP) based on the SMF, in a manner acceptable<br />

and satisfactory to the <strong>Bank</strong>. This arrangement is a continuation of the arrangement established<br />

for implementing R&R measures for the rail component of MUTP-1. Other social safeguard<br />

risks relating to access, health, safety, and unequal wages will be monitored and mitigated as part<br />

of construction management.<br />

60. Assessment approach: In order to identify and assess the nature and magnitude of<br />

social impacts, MRVC has carried out a social impact assessment (SIA) as part of the<br />

Environment Assessment (EA). The EA Report, which includes a separate section on social<br />

issues, has confirmed that the project will require no private land acquisition. A few railway<br />

employees earlier living at the proposed site at Thane have shifted away after the project was<br />

announced and some ten such railway employees living close to the proposed stabling lines at<br />

Bhaindar North informed during EA that they will shift away before the commencement of the<br />

work. As railway staff, they will be provided with staff quarters or monthly house rent allowance<br />

enabling them to relocate away from this place. A supplementary social impact survey was<br />

carried out at the proposed site for stabling lines at the Virar Scrap yard to assess the nature and<br />

magnitude of impact on 38 structures located close to the railway tracks. The survey findings<br />

were as follows: (a) Out of 38 structures, 37 were residential structures and one was a temple;<br />

none of these are affected by the proposed stabling lines work; however, (b) 13 of these<br />

structures are located alongside tracks and occupied by railway employees living there; the<br />

15


families need to be shifted for safety reasons; and they will be provided with staff quarters or<br />

receive monthly house rent allowance enabling them to relocate; c) the other structures including<br />

a temple and residences for 18 squatter households and six tenants (in private houses) are beyond<br />

the execution zone and will not need to be relocated; (d) the execution areas and the railway<br />

tracks at this stretch will be barricaded for enhancing human safety.<br />

61. At certain other proposed work sites, some lands required for the project have been<br />

licensed out by the <strong>Railway</strong>s to its employees for vegetable cultivation in order to prevent<br />

encroachment. These licenses are issued on annual basis and will normally be allowed to run<br />

their course before the work commences. In cases where this is not possible, the licenses will be<br />

terminated with one month’s advance notice as per the license terms and conditions by the<br />

<strong>Railway</strong>s providing the licensees with sufficient time to harvest crops and salvage assets if any<br />

before such licenses come to an end.<br />

62. Resettlement instrument and measures: The results of the EA and supplementary<br />

social impact survey carried out by MRVC confirmed that no land acquisition or R&R measures<br />

are required for the project. In order to deal with any future involuntary resettlement impacts due<br />

to any alteration in design or outlay, MRVC has prepared and adopted a Social Management<br />

Framework (SMF). which is detailed under the R&R Policy, which was adopted for the ongoing<br />

MUTP-1 and is satisfactory to the <strong>Bank</strong>, setting forth the rules and procedures for carrying out<br />

any social, resettlement and rehabilitation activities under the Project, including identification,<br />

assessment and mitigation of potential environmental and social impacts arising from the Project,<br />

carrying out consultations, processing and redressing grievances, monitoring related impacts,<br />

and, if required, limited resettlement and rehabilitation action plans and other development and<br />

entitlement plans for people adversely affected as result of Project implementation.<br />

63. Implementation arrangements for mitigation measures: The implementing<br />

agency has fair experience in coordinating land acquisition and resettlement activities with the<br />

state government. It was involved with the land acquisition for carrying out the rail component of<br />

MUTP-1. MRVC has gained considerable exposure to the sensitiveness of urban resettlement<br />

issues by way of coordinating with MMRDA in resettling a large number of project-affected<br />

people from along the railway sub-projects of MUTP-1. This arrangement is a continuation of<br />

the arrangement established for implementing R&R measures for the rail component of MUTP-<br />

1. MRVC’s main task will be to coordinate efforts with MMRDA for carrying out the mitigation<br />

measures, for management of which it has the required capacity.<br />

64. Social safeguards in Project Implementation Manual: The current project design<br />

involves no private land acquisition or resettlement impacts. MRVC has prepared a Project<br />

Implementation Manual, the Chapter-3 of which refers to the social management framework<br />

which will enable MRVC to address land acquisition and R&R issues in the event of any future<br />

alteration in the project design or lay out.<br />

E. Environment<br />

65. Potential Environment Issues: The project activities under MUTP-2A are<br />

expected to have only a few negative environmental impacts. These will mostly occur in areas<br />

where new stabling lines or traction substations are proposed. Augmentation of workshops is<br />

16


likely to have few adverse environmental impacts. The long-term impacts identified include tree<br />

cutting at proposed sites, potential for damage to (only a few) mangroves in one location, and<br />

potential traffic safety hazards due to re-routing in select locations. Additionally, temporary<br />

impacts related with the construction stage are also expected on the following aspects: increased<br />

air pollution and safety hazard due to increased traffic, especially close to sensitive receptors,<br />

increased noise levels, potential impacts from improper handling of hazardous substances like<br />

asbestos and oils, pollution of water courses close to sites, and provision for labor. In light of<br />

these limited impacts, the project has been assigned Category B.<br />

66. Assessment Approach: The environmental assessment has included review of the<br />

relevant activities in MUTP-1, followed by site visits to potential sites under the project and onsite<br />

discussions with stakeholders, including railway officials. This has been followed up by a<br />

review of the contract documents for environmental management aspects. Prototype<br />

environmental management plans have been prepared for activities that are common across sites.<br />

Plans have then been modified to suit site conditions such as at Chinchpokli traction substation,<br />

where handling asbestos is likely to be an important issue. A framework has been prepared to<br />

assess and manage impacts in locations where sites may have to be changed due to unforeseen<br />

circumstances. The resultant generic environmental management plan has been included in the<br />

project’s Operations Manual.<br />

67. Environmental Management: The experience gained during the preparation and<br />

implementation of MUTP-1 has been advantageously used in establishing the current approach<br />

to environmental management. Permissions for cutting/transplanting trees will be obtained<br />

before work starts on site and the contractors will be required to obtain the required regulatory<br />

clearances. Following the review of contract documents as part of the EA, modifications have<br />

been agreed to mainstream environmental management measures in the contracts executed<br />

through MRVC. For the contracts to be executed through the participating CR and WR, it has<br />

been agreed that the relevant provisions from the <strong>Railway</strong> Contracts Manual are to be enforced<br />

and the necessary instructions to the contractors are to be issued. Since MRVC has already<br />

qualified organization-wide as an ISO 14001-compliant environmental management system,<br />

handling of environmental measures is expected to be streamlined, on the basis of the EMPs<br />

prepared under the project.<br />

F. Safeguard policies<br />

Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project Yes No<br />

Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01) [X] [ ]<br />

Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04) [ ] [X]<br />

Pest Management (OP 4.09) [ ] [X]<br />

Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11) [ ] [X]<br />

Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12) [X] [ ]<br />

Indigenous Peoples (OP/BP 4.10) [ ] [X]<br />

Forests (OP/BP 4.36) [ ] [X]<br />

Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37) [ ] [X]<br />

Projects in Disputed Areas (OP/BP 7.60) [ ] [X]<br />

Projects on International Waterways (OP/BP 7.50) [ ] [X]<br />

17


Environmental Assessment (OP/BP/GP 4.01). The environmental category of the Project is B.<br />

Disclosure. Consultations were held with local people during preparation of the environmental<br />

and social assessments. Since the majority of stakeholders are railway employees, discussions<br />

were also held with railway officials on the likely impacts, and how to handle these. The two<br />

assessments, once finalized, will be disclosed on the MRVC website and copies of the summary<br />

will also be available in Marathi for perusal in the local railways’ offices.<br />

G. Policy Exceptions and Readiness<br />

68. No policy exceptions are required. The project complies with the readiness filter for<br />

transport projects in India. The first-year contracts and consultants are in advanced stages of<br />

bidding.<br />

18


Annex 1: Country and Sector or Program Background<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

Urbanization and Infrastructure Development in India<br />

69. In recent years India’s GDP has grown rapidly, at an average pace of eight percent per<br />

year and a peak of 9.7 percent in 2006-07. At the same time its inhabitants are moving from the<br />

countryside to cities in large numbers. By 2030 more than 40 percent of India’s population will<br />

be living in cities and towns, up from 28 percent today; the urban population, growing at three<br />

percent per year, will have doubled from 286 million to 575 million. In India as elsewhere,<br />

urbanization has been recognized as an important driver of economic growth, and cities now<br />

contribute over 55 percent of the country’s GDP. 3<br />

70. Infrastructure development in most Indian cities is not keeping pace with the increase in<br />

travel demand. Indeed, the growth of vehicles in the streets has been far greater than the growth<br />

in the street network; as a result the main arteries face capacity saturation. Between 1951 and<br />

2004 at national level, the motor vehicle fleet grew at a compound annual growth rate of close to<br />

11 per cent compared to an average rate of 3.6 per cent in the total road length. Within this total<br />

priority was given to rural roads; national highways grew by only 2.3 per cent 4 . As a direct<br />

consequence of urbanization and the lag in responding, roads have become ever more congested,<br />

travel speeds have decreased and travel times have become longer. Energy is wasted and<br />

pollution gets worse.<br />

71. The railway network is suffering an equally acute shortage of capacity. At national level,<br />

from 1951 to 2008 the network was lengthened by only 18 percent (in route-km), while the<br />

number of passengers carried tripled and people traveled further, so that the number of<br />

passenger-km multiplied by 10 5 . Suburban rail and Metro account for a large part of this increase<br />

in traffic. Suburban rail use increased sharply as the number of passenger-km grew 18-fold over<br />

the same period from 1951 to 2008, with a doubling between 1991 and 2008 (Figure 1).<br />

150000<br />

100000<br />

50000<br />

0<br />

Figure 1. Growth in Suburban Rail Travel in Indian Cities, 1951-2001<br />

(in millions of passenger-km)<br />

6551 11770<br />

22984<br />

41086<br />

59578<br />

88872<br />

119842<br />

1950-51 1960-61 1970-71 1980-81 1990-91 2000-01 2007-08<br />

Source: Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s 2009.<br />

3 UNDP. “India: Urban Poverty Report 2009.” http://www.undp.org.in/content/pub/PovertyReduction/INDIA-<br />

URBAN-POVERTY-REPORT-2009.pdf<br />

4 Transport Research Wing, “Road Transport Yearbook 2006-07”, Government of India<br />

5 Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s of India. Statistical Summary – Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s: 1950-2007.<br />

19


<strong>Mumbai</strong>’s Contribution to National Economy<br />

72. The <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region (MMR), with a population of nearly 18 million in<br />

2001 6 , is the sixth largest metropolitan area in the world. <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s primacy in India’s economic<br />

well-being cannot be over-estimated. As the financial and commercial capital of India and the<br />

most prominent gateway to the country, <strong>Mumbai</strong>‘s economy is of critical importance for a<br />

variety of strategic reasons. It has the largest GDP of any Indian city, followed by the national<br />

capital region Delhi, Kolkata and Chennai. In FY 2004-05, MMR contributed 40 percent to the<br />

total Maharashtra State GDP 7 , and in FY2006-07 <strong>Mumbai</strong> contributed 6.2 percent of national<br />

GDP 8 . It accounts for 33 percent of India’s income tax collections, 60 percent of its customs duty<br />

collections, 20 percent of central excise tax collections, 40 percent of port trade and 60 percent of<br />

stock exchange trading 9 . As the subcontinent’s largest port, <strong>Mumbai</strong> handles 30 percent of<br />

India's exports and imports 10 .<br />

73. While manufacturing’s share in the Indian economy has declined over the last decade, the<br />

service sector has emerged as the growth driver, offering financial services, information<br />

technology (IT) and information-technology-enabled services, media and entertainment,<br />

hospitality and tourism. <strong>Mumbai</strong> is pre-eminent in these industries and now accounts for 11<br />

percent of India's total employment and 20 percent of its employment in industry 11 .<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> Transportation<br />

74. <strong>Mumbai</strong> has an extensive rail and bus system, and public transport is used for three out of<br />

every four motorized trips in Greater <strong>Mumbai</strong>, with rail being the dominant mode (Figure 2).<br />

The <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban <strong>Railway</strong> system, part of the Region’s public transportation system, is<br />

operated by two of India <strong>Railway</strong>’s zonal railways, WR and CR, which run the two largest and<br />

busiest networks among IR’s 16 zones 12 .<br />

75. The Western line runs northwards from Churchgate terminus station in Island City and<br />

serves suburban passengers living along the west coast towards Ahmedabad and Delhi. The WR<br />

operates 1,106 scheduled suburban train roundtrips per weekday over 124 route-km between<br />

Churchgate and Virar, including six trains between <strong>Mumbai</strong> Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus (CST)<br />

and Borivali. This requires a working fleet of 25 nine-car train sets, 48 twelve-car train sets and<br />

one fifteen-car one.<br />

76. The CR runs from <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST station located very close to Churchgate in Island City<br />

and serves a large part of central India to the east of <strong>Mumbai</strong>. The CR operates 1,464 scheduled<br />

6 Census of India, 2001.<br />

7 LEA Associates South Asia, “Comprehensive Transportation Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Area” (CTS),<br />

MMRDA, April 2008.<br />

8 http://www.financialexpress.com/news/gdp-growth-surat-fastest-mumbai-largest/266636/<br />

9 MRVC. “<strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban <strong>Railway</strong> System.” Presentation. March 2007.<br />

10 Business Melbourne. “City Profile: <strong>Mumbai</strong>.” July 2004. Prepared by Sustainable Business and Trade<br />

Development. https://www.businessmelbourne.com.au/docs/active/doc1044.pdf<br />

11 Source: Ibidem. The term industry here refers to the secondary sector, including: textiles, pharmecuticals,<br />

construction, engineering, metals, petroleum, silks, glassware, and printing. Before the industrial growth following<br />

<strong>World</strong> War II, India’s economy used to rely mainly on manufactured goods, of which <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s textiles have<br />

always represented an important share.<br />

12 Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s operate both long-distance and suburban rail systems.<br />

20


suburban train roundtrips per weekday over 280 route-km from <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST northeast-wards to<br />

Kotputari, southeast-wards to Khopoli and to Panvel via Mankhurd, Andheri on the Western<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> and between Thane and Vashi via Ghansoli. This requires an operating fleet of 60 ninecar<br />

train sets and 50 twelve-car sets. 13 The annual growth rate of rail passengers on CR is 2.6<br />

percent and on WR 0.7 percent.<br />

Figure 2. Modal Split in <strong>Mumbai</strong> in 2008<br />

Taxi/Ric<br />

kshaw<br />

9%<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> Modal Split by No. of Trips - No<br />

Walk<br />

Two Car 7%<br />

Wheeler<br />

7%<br />

Cycle<br />

3%<br />

Train<br />

51%<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> Modal Split by Person*km - No Walk<br />

Taxi/Rick<br />

shaw 3%<br />

Bus 10%<br />

Two<br />

Wheeler<br />

3%<br />

Car 5% Cycle 1%<br />

Bus 23%<br />

Train<br />

78%<br />

Source: Comprehensive Transportation Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region, LEA Associates, April 2008<br />

Quality of Suburban <strong>Railway</strong> Services<br />

77. Because of its extensive reach across the metropolitan region and its intensive use by the<br />

local population, the suburban railway has been suffering severe overcrowding, which has grown<br />

to be a major issue. The very poor travel conditions for rail commuters are incompatible with the<br />

objectives of <strong>Mumbai</strong> to become a world-class city with an acceptable level of comfort,<br />

convenience and safety. In 2007-08 an estimated 6.8 million passengers daily 14 traveled on the<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban railway (2.5 billion trips annually), which makes the suburban rail system the<br />

lifeline of <strong>Mumbai</strong>. At peak hour, the average frequency for train services is a very reasonable 16<br />

trains per hour (a train every four minutes). One of the attributes of this suburban rail network is<br />

low fares compared to other public transport systems. However, this comes at the price of<br />

overcrowding - one of the most acute in the world, with about 5,000 passengers traveling in a<br />

nine-car train as against a rated carrying capacity of 1,700. This translates into a density of up to<br />

16 people per square meter in Second Class General coaches (officially referred to as ‘superdense<br />

crush load’ by the Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s when specifically referring to the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban<br />

system), as measured in the 2008 TranSforM Comprehensive Transportation Study for MMR.<br />

Overcrowding also severely slows down train speeds. While the recently introduced AC/DC<br />

13 <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region Development Authority. “Comprehensive Transportation Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />

Metropolitan Region.” April 2008. LEA International <strong>Ltd</strong>., Canada, in joint venture with LEA Associates South<br />

Asia Pvt. <strong>Ltd</strong>., India. Updated by MRVC by e-mail on January 21, 2010.<br />

14 Number of one-way trips per day.<br />

21


EMU trains are capable of 100 km/h under light traffic conditions, the actual average speed of<br />

the trains is a mere 35 km/h on most lines, the cumulative effect of several factors. 15<br />

78. Due to the overcrowding, doors of coaches cannot be closed and passengers dangle<br />

outside from the open doors. Nearby squatter settlements and encroachers within the railway<br />

right-of-way safety zone are other causes of frequent casualties on the <strong>Mumbai</strong> system. Stations<br />

are always overcrowded. People rarely use proper crossing places and prefer trespassing and<br />

crossing the rail lines. Trespassing, which occurs not only in the station areas but also in between<br />

them, forces trains to slow down and so increases travel times, limits capacity and hampers track<br />

maintenance work. Deaths of squatters and trespassers after being struck by a train and<br />

passengers falling off trains are a daily occurrence. There are about ten to twelve 16 deaths per<br />

day on the <strong>Mumbai</strong> rail system (which is high but still less than the rate of five to seven 17 deaths<br />

per day on the roads and streets in the MMR 18 , considering the far greater volumes carried by<br />

rail). Table 1 below shows the gravity of this issue: the numbers of deaths and injuries have<br />

grown at yearly rates of 3.3 and 5.6 percent respectively from 2001 to 2008, with an annual<br />

average growth of 4.4 percent for the total number of casualties. Among the causes of death and<br />

injury, the continued increase in the number of passengers falling off the train is particularly<br />

noteworthy (this increase is in part due to the increase in the number of trains and the opening of<br />

new lines). Reducing the number of fatalities related to its suburban rail services is one of the<br />

priorities of Western <strong>Railway</strong>, Central <strong>Railway</strong> and MRVC, which in November 2009 decided to<br />

prepare an action plan on how to effectively reduce the casualties among trespassers.<br />

Table 1. <strong>Railway</strong> Accidents in <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region, year by year<br />

2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />

Accidental Deaths<br />

While crossing the railway line 1,971 2,517 2,479 2,561 2,603 2,448<br />

Falling off the train 603 453 494 606 647 615<br />

Others* 142 85 705 862 747 719<br />

Total Accidental Deaths 2,885 3,055 3,678 4,029 3,997 3,782<br />

Injured Persons<br />

While crossing the railway line 1,147 856 810 1,040 1,048 916<br />

Falling off the train 1,454 1,420 1,639 1,898 2,033 1,854<br />

Others 144 657 1,064 1,195 1,226 1,260<br />

Total Injured Persons 2,745 2,933 3,513 4,133 4,307 4,030<br />

Total Casualties 5,760 6,227 7,191 8,162 8,304 7,812<br />

Source: <strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Police Commissionerate, 2007<br />

* Other causes of accidents include: falling off the platform, derailments, bridge collapses<br />

15 LEA Associates, Comprehensive Transportation Study.<br />

16 This amounts to 6.9 deaths per 100 million passenger-km (total suburban rail passenger traffic based on<br />

LEA Associates’ estimate is 173 million passenger-km/day in 2006).<br />

17 This amounts to 11.2 deaths per 100 million passenger-km (total road traffic including non-mechanized trips<br />

based on LEA Associates’ estimate is 62.5 million passenger-km/day in 2006).<br />

18 Basic Transport and Communication Statistics for MMR, March 2005, by MMRDA and Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />

22


<strong>Mumbai</strong> Rail and Urban Poverty<br />

79. Commuting to work accounts for two-thirds of all trips in the <strong>Mumbai</strong> metropolitan<br />

region –when weighted by the distance traveled. Many people still walk, but for distances of<br />

more than 1-2 km motorized travel is a must. Suburban rail is the backbone of such commuting<br />

trips, accounting for half of all non-walking trips and nearly 80 percent of the non-walking<br />

distance traveled (see Figure 2). Rail is consistently the preferred motorized mode of transport<br />

across all income groups.<br />

80. For low-income commuters the cost of transport is the major consideration. For very lowincome<br />

commuters walking is often the only affordable alternative. Thus, the urban poor rely<br />

heavily on walking (61 percent for commuters in households earning less than Rs. 5,000 -<br />

US$100- per month), and in general the poor use less motorized transit (including rail) than<br />

higher-income groups. However, this income group also often chooses to take rail for long<br />

distances (5 km or more) and as much as one in four low-income commuters who live in certain<br />

zones take rail to work. These commuters will therefore, even in the short run, benefit from<br />

improvements in transit service and/or fares.<br />

81. Middle-income and low-income users above extreme poverty are the prime customers for<br />

rail transit, as the fares are lower than for bus transit, and buying and maintaining a car is beyond<br />

the means of a large number of households. “The cost per km of traveling by rail is also much<br />

cheaper than the cost of bus service or other public transport, especially if a monthly pass is<br />

purchased. For example, a worker with a commute of 20 km each way would pay only Rs. 90 per<br />

month to commute by rail—less than Rs. 4 (10 US¢) per day. The cost per day of commuting 20<br />

km via bus is, by contrast, Rs. 20”. 19<br />

82. Finally, the future strategy for MMR proposed in the TranSforM study also underlines<br />

that “the extension of suburban rail will ensure that distances are minimized and access to<br />

livelihoods, education and other social needs, especially for the marginal segments of the urban<br />

population, is improved.”<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> Rail and Air Quality<br />

83. The rapid pace of urbanization and probable acceleration of motorization trends in MMR<br />

present a threat to ambient air quality, which is already a major health issue in most urban areas<br />

in India. Indeed, the concentration of respirable particulate matter (RSPM) 20 in <strong>Mumbai</strong> has<br />

increased by 53 percent from 2006 to 2008, mainly due to the 45 percent increase in the number<br />

of registered vehicles from 2003 to 2008. The Central Pollution Control Board’s National<br />

Ambient Air Quality Status Report for 2008 underlines that the RSPM levels in <strong>Mumbai</strong> are<br />

“alarming”. The RSPM concentration in MMR in 2008 was 132 μg/m3. The <strong>World</strong> Health<br />

Organization considers levels above 120 μg/m3 to be “high”, the second highest category right<br />

19 Cropper et al., Urban Poverty and Transport: The Case of <strong>Mumbai</strong>, <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Working Paper 2005.<br />

20 Particles produced by vehicle exhaust, burning of fuel and garbage, industrial sources, and re-suspension of dust.<br />

23


elow “critical”. Although sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) and nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) levels are still within<br />

reasonable limits 21 , current motorization trends are not environmentally sustainable. 22<br />

84. “In <strong>Mumbai</strong> the main contributor of air pollution is the transport sector, followed by<br />

power plants, industrial units and the burning of garbage.” 23 Irrespective of improvements in<br />

engines and fuel type, ambient air quality is bound to further deteriorate because of the<br />

motorization rate if no compensatory action is taken. Understanding the need for a sustainable<br />

urban development strategy, in 2004 MMRDA retained the National Environmental Engineering<br />

Research Institute to prepare strategies and an action plan for particulate matter reduction in<br />

MMR. The study included assessment of ambient air quality status (especially for particulate<br />

matter PM10), the development of reduction and mitigation strategies, and a reduction action<br />

plan.<br />

85. Developing suburban rail use would contribute to the efforts being made in India as well<br />

as in other countries to reduce GHG emissions. MUTP-2A aims at expanding an energy-efficient<br />

public transport system and minimizing motor vehicle use, the main source of pollution. Indeed,<br />

as presented in Annex 9, expanding the rail network capacity will likely lead to a diversion of<br />

passengers from bus services. This reduction in bus operations will in turn contribute to reducing<br />

pollution, because EMU trains emit very limited pollutant quantities, whereas buses emit NO 2<br />

and SO 2 at a rate of 0.25 kg per bus per hour.<br />

86. Finally, the conversion from DC to AC will allow the use of more energy-efficient trains,<br />

thus further decreasing CO 2 emissions and allowing MRVC to claim carbon credits. The energy<br />

saving per year due to the trains already introduced at this point is estimated at 6.2 million kWh,<br />

and this allows for a generation of carbon credits equivalent to 62.6 thousand tCO 2 e 24 per year. 25<br />

Long-term Transportation Strategy for MMR<br />

87. Within the next 25 years, <strong>Mumbai</strong> is projected to overtake Tokyo and become the largest<br />

urban region in the world, in a country having one of the fastest expanding global economies. In<br />

2004, a task force appointed by the Chief Minister of Maharashtra conducted a comprehensive<br />

transportation study for the metropolitan region known widely by the acronym TranSforM (for<br />

21 The concentrations in SO 2 and NO 2 are 9 μg/m 3 and 42 μg/m 3 in 2008 respectively. Both levels are currently<br />

labeled as “low” (between 0 and 40 μg/m 3 ).<br />

22 “According to a study carried out by EMBARQ in cooperation with the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> in 2007, continuation of the<br />

rapid motorization trends without adequate policy and technological interventions (the “business-as-usual” scenario)<br />

would increase the annual national CO 2 emissions from urban transport sector (in all major cities) to 254 million<br />

tons of CO 2 in 2030, which is more than nine times the emissions level in 2005.” (Project Appraisal <strong>Document</strong>,<br />

Sustainable Urban Transport Project, <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> 2009).<br />

23 Larssen et al., URBAIR Urban Air Quality Management Strategy in Asia: Greater <strong>Mumbai</strong> Report, <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong><br />

1997.<br />

24 tCO2e: Tons of CO 2 equivalent is a measure for describing how much global warming a given type and amount of<br />

greenhouse gas may cause, using the functionally equivalent amount of carbon dioxide as reference.<br />

25 MRVC Letter to <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> dated May 16, 2008 regarding Generation of Carbon Credits on account of energy<br />

saving due to DC/AC conversion on <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban section of CR WR under MUTP 1 and 2.<br />

24


“Transportation Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong>”). 26 Its vision statement is: “Transforming <strong>Mumbai</strong> into a<br />

world-class metropolis with a vibrant economy and globally comparable quality of life for its<br />

citizens”.<br />

88. One of the Vision’s several goals is for the MMR to become an important logistic and<br />

export hub through synergy between ports, airports and special economic zones. Moreover, it<br />

also aims at guaranteeing to all MMR citizens access to public transport, in addition to other<br />

basic civic services: safe drinking water, sanitation, education, health care and recreation<br />

facilities. A key long-term transportation strategy is “to achieve balanced, integrated and<br />

sustainable public/private transportation systems to meet the aspirations of the public for<br />

freedom and convenience of travel.” 27<br />

89. The transport network recommended by the TranSforM study includes a dominant role<br />

for suburban rail. The current strategy is for it to remain the backbone of commuting trips in the<br />

MMR in the medium term. A certain decrease in suburban rail’s modal share due to diversion of<br />

trips to new metro lines is expected. 28 However, if the strategic guidelines of TranSforM are<br />

carried out, the forecast sustainable modal split still sees suburban rail as the dominant mode, as<br />

shown in Figure 3. Indeed, the proposed future strategy for the region relies heavily on an<br />

extensive expansion of the rail-based transit system. This is reflected in the very large planned<br />

investment in suburban rail by 2031: Rs. 315 billion (nearly US$7 billion), the second largest<br />

investment after the metro system (Rs. 922 billion). 29<br />

Figure 3. Modal Split in <strong>Mumbai</strong> in 2005 and as per TranSforM strategy in 2016<br />

Train,<br />

53.3%<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> Modal Split by No. of Trips - No<br />

Walk 2005<br />

Metro,<br />

0.0%<br />

Car,<br />

4.9% Two-<br />

Wheeler,<br />

7.9%<br />

Auto,<br />

7.4%<br />

Bus,<br />

24.9%<br />

Taxi,<br />

1.6%<br />

Strategic <strong>Mumbai</strong> Modal Split by No. of<br />

Trips - No Walk 2016<br />

Metro,<br />

30.7%<br />

Train,<br />

33.5%<br />

Car,<br />

8.6%<br />

Two-<br />

Wheeler,<br />

11.3%<br />

Auto,<br />

4.7%<br />

Taxi,<br />

1.4%<br />

Bus,<br />

9.9%<br />

Source: Comprehensive Transportation Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region, LEA Associates, April 2008<br />

26 <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region Development Authority. “Comprehensive Transportation Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />

Metropolitan Region.” April 2008. LEA International <strong>Ltd</strong>., Canada, in joint venture with LEA Associates South<br />

Asia Pvt. <strong>Ltd</strong>., India.<br />

27 Ibidem.<br />

28 This is due to the fact that connectivity by the metro network will be extensive and that metro stations are to be<br />

spaced at 1-km intervals.<br />

29 By comparison, investment in freeways and roads is only forecast at Rs. 267 billion and in buses at Rs.43 billion.<br />

25


Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s’ Development Strategy<br />

90. Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s, with 63,221 route-km of network and 1.42 million employees, is one of<br />

the largest rail networks of the world. It constitutes the lifeline and the mainstay of the country’s<br />

transport infrastructure. Over the last few years, IR has achieved a dramatic re-invention of its<br />

business and is presently witnessing one of the most impressive and unprecedented expansions in<br />

its history. During the last few years the freight traffic on IR has been growing at 9.4 percent and<br />

passenger traffic at 7.4 percent, and revenue has grown even faster. This is in sharp contrast to<br />

the historical trend rates of growth at 3-4 percent per year. In the passenger segment, while<br />

affordability continues to underpin the pricing for second-class passengers, there has been<br />

reduction in fares for passengers in air-conditioned class and those traveling short distance.<br />

These measures have redefined the transport scene in the country and transformed the railways<br />

as a competitive and viable alternative to road transport. By 2012, IR is projected to handle 25<br />

percent more passengers than handled in 2008.<br />

91. During the past five years, IR has achieved commendable results by substantially<br />

increasing the volume of traffic carried and its profits. However, it now faces several new<br />

challenges. The recent increase in the wage bill, accompanied by a downturn in economic growth<br />

in 2009, have already affected IR’s bottom line adversely. In addition, the planned large<br />

investment in Dedicated Freight Corridors (DFC) in the medium term will create excess capacity<br />

in its start-up years that will reduce IR’s profits unless it develops marketing strategies to rapidly<br />

attract new traffic to the existing corridors (mainly passengers), as well as to the new dedicated<br />

freight corridors.<br />

92. Going forward, the expected continued economic growth of India over the next 20 years<br />

at eight percent or more will impose new challenges on IR in respect of capacity, transportation<br />

and logistic products and service quality to be expected by rail customers in freight as well as<br />

passenger services. It is foreseen that the customer’s profile will undergo a significant change, as<br />

an average rail customer is expected to experience a four-to-five fold increase in income and at<br />

the same time will demand more comfortable and faster travel. Customers will be willing to pay<br />

higher fares for these improved services. These challenges can be addressed effectively by<br />

implementing Vision 2020 for IR. An immediate next step would be to develop a credible<br />

financing plan to effectively underpin IR’s developmental plans.<br />

93. Another important step is to develop an action plan (road map) that lays out specific<br />

strategies and measures to be implemented to overcome the present constraints and, more<br />

importantly, to enable IR to satisfactorily support the growing economy by increasing capacity<br />

and improving service quality. IR needs to prioritize actions and investments over the next ten<br />

years and set out an implementation schedule. It will also attempt to identify funding sources for<br />

the recommended investments.<br />

Management of MMR<br />

94. Responsibilities for the general direction of urban development and urban transport rest<br />

with the State Government of Maharashtra (GOM) through the <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region<br />

Development Authority (MMRDA), a regional developmental agency under the Department of<br />

Urban Development. To enable the <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban <strong>Railway</strong> to meet the demands of the ever-<br />

26


growing passenger traffic, the Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s and GOM jointly established <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />

<strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> Limited (MRVC) in 1999 with the mission to develop world-class<br />

infrastructure for an efficient, safe and sustainable railway system in <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s suburban section,<br />

to provide comfortable and friendly train services to commuters. Its objectives included to: (i)<br />

integrate suburban rail capacity enhancement plans with the urban development plan for <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />

and propose investments, (ii) implement rail infrastructure projects in <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s suburban areas,<br />

(iii) commercially develop railway land and airspace in <strong>Mumbai</strong> to raise funds for suburban<br />

railway development, (iv) resettle and rehabilitate project-affected households and (v) to be an<br />

infrastructure company committed to sustainable development and environment friendly<br />

construction in <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban section.<br />

95. In 2009 a first step was taken through the decision that metropolitan planning should be<br />

done by a “Metropolitan Planning Committee” (MPC). District planning committees also exist<br />

whose task is to plan for each district within the Region, but it is not yet clear how they should<br />

coordinate with MPC or MMRDA. Further institutional strengthening of the coordinating role of<br />

MMRDA or the creation of a separate Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority is currently<br />

under consideration.<br />

96. Funding arrangements for urban transport infrastructure and services in <strong>Mumbai</strong> are split<br />

between a number of national, state and local government agencies. No single agency has the<br />

role or responsibility for preparing integrated investment and operations budgets which meet<br />

travel demands and policy objectives, optimize the use of scarce resources, and are affordable.<br />

Public investment has been lagging behind demand, most notably on the railways, while on the<br />

roads maintenance expenditure is about half what is needed to keep them in good condition.<br />

Since the planning and provision of suburban rail services is IR’s responsibility, MMRDA has<br />

little influence over them. The allocation of resources for rail services is subject to the approval<br />

of the (national) Planning Commission and IR. The Western <strong>Railway</strong> and Central <strong>Railway</strong><br />

operating within the metropolitan region are independent agencies of IR, with their own lines<br />

and no integration of services.<br />

MUTP-1 Accomplishments and Potential Benefits of MUTP-2A<br />

97. In early 2000 MUTP-1 was launched to address issues pertaining to (i) the inadequate<br />

capacity and low speed of rail services and contentious resettlement and rehabilitation (including<br />

land acquisition); (ii) limited East-West connectivity, poor traffic management, and road safety;<br />

and (iii) inadequate bus services and road maintenance, pollution from motor vehicles, limited<br />

involvement of stakeholders, institutional weaknesses and inadequate funding. In June 2002 the<br />

<strong>Bank</strong> approved Loan 4665-IN and Credit 3662-IN to finance the project, which became effective<br />

in November 2002. Because its components concern different sub-sectors, the project has six<br />

implementing agencies, including MRVC for the rail transport component. MMRDA is the<br />

coordinating agency and is responsible for carrying out the resettlement and rehabilitation<br />

component on behalf of all the implementing agencies.<br />

98. The rail component aims to improve the capacity and performance of the suburban<br />

rail system through service efficiency improvements (increasing existing track capacity,<br />

converting from DC to AC, and improving electrical, signaling and telecommunication systems),<br />

procuring new rolling stock and upgrading existing rolling stock, and expanding network<br />

27


capacity. The component also supports studies and technical assistance, among other things, to<br />

improve Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s capabilities for track and rolling stock maintenance, financial<br />

management and control systems, railway safety and quality assurance.<br />

99. Since its start the project has made significant progress towards achieving its<br />

development objectives. As a result of the resettlement of squatters along rail tracks and the<br />

completion of track doubling on the Western <strong>Railway</strong> corridor, the efficiency of suburban train<br />

operations has increased, with a rise in its peak-time capacity by 7-10 percent and a reduction in<br />

commuting time by four to nine minutes for about six million daily passengers. An improvement<br />

in transport services in terms of quality and comfort is noticed as a result of the addition of a few<br />

new trains and the replacement of 644 buses by new ones. However, improvements in traffic<br />

management technical capacity within the Municipal <strong>Corporation</strong> of Greater <strong>Mumbai</strong> need to be<br />

further strengthened and sustained.<br />

100. Up to March 2010, 84 twelve-car rakes of new EMU trains (equivalent to 108<br />

nine-car rakes) were put into service. Of these 84 rakes, 51 were financed by the <strong>Bank</strong> and<br />

procured by MRVC, while the other 33 rakes were funded and procured by Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s on<br />

their own. Together, they have reduced crowding in the system from 500 people per coach ppdpk<br />

to 450, despite a net increase in passengers. It is expected that once all additional 72 <strong>Bank</strong>financed<br />

twelve-car trains (equivalent to 96 nine-car trains) are in service, crowding will be<br />

reduced to 350 ppdpk, i.e. 30 percent less than the original density --but still twice the rated<br />

carrying capacity.<br />

101. Through the preparation of MUTP-1 a partnership was created between the GOM<br />

and IR for developing <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s suburban rail system, and it was institutionalized by the<br />

creation of MRVC. MRVC as an implementing agency has proven to be an efficient tool, and<br />

attests to the success of this partnership. Prior to MUTP-1 the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban system suffered<br />

due to lack of investment in renewal of aging assets as well as expansion to meet the everincreasing<br />

demand, as IR had much greater interest in main line services on a national scale. The<br />

partnership between GOM and IR has been considered positive enough to continue for the<br />

preparation and implementation of MUTP-2A. And MRVC has gained professionalism in project<br />

implementation, coordinating effectively with both the GOM and the various departments of IR.<br />

Its increased efficiency has resulted in MRVC being commissioned for other studies to develop<br />

suburban rail services in <strong>Mumbai</strong>.<br />

102. Through MUTP-1 MMRDA has gained experience and capacity in handling<br />

resettlement of large numbers of people. This project has been a first for <strong>Mumbai</strong> and a first for<br />

the <strong>Bank</strong> to handle resettlement of so many people in an urban setting. During implementation,<br />

difficulties occurred in handling the resettlement. A <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Inspection Panel investigated<br />

the project’s resettlement process and raised concerns about implementation issues, including the<br />

way medium and large shopkeepers were resettled, the quality of the baseline survey of projectaffected<br />

people, management of post-resettlement activities, grievance redressal processes, and<br />

project supervision. The implementation by GOM of a remedial action plan, with the active<br />

support of the <strong>Bank</strong>, resulted in a much improved quality of the resettlement and rehabilitation<br />

process. MMRDA evolved towards a problem-solving approach for resettlement, exploring<br />

negotiated solutions as often as possible. The experience gained by MMRDA thereby is now<br />

used by the <strong>Bank</strong> as an example for other large cities with similar challenges.<br />

28


103. Further capacity will be needed to meet the future growth in demand. The<br />

population in areas of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region served by suburban railway is expected<br />

to grow at 1.8 percent per year for the next decade, boosting the demand for suburban rail<br />

services and the need to increase capacity commensurately. The comprehensive transport study<br />

carried out under MUTP-1 (paragraph 88 above) recommended such an increase as a priority.<br />

This need was already foreseen at the time MUTP-1 was prepared and the genesis of MUTP-2A<br />

lies in MUTP-1, one of the key objectives of which was to address the overcrowding on<br />

suburban trains. The size of MUTP-1 was limited because funding was insufficient then to<br />

finance all the EMU coaches needed for full use of the infrastructure created under the project.<br />

By the end of MUTP-1, the suburban rail system will have 2,260 EMU coaches. Based on<br />

simulation modeling of the time table, the total number of EMU coaches can increase to 3,124 to<br />

reach full use of today’s infrastructure. The additional 864 EMU coaches (72 twelve-car trains)<br />

to be financed under MUTP-2A will bring the fleet up to this full capacity. The demand will still<br />

be in excess of the supply, but this additional transport capacity will further reduce the<br />

overcrowding in suburban trains.<br />

104. The project will provide several categories of local benefits for commuters, such as (i)<br />

reduced travel time, (ii) improved travel comfort, and (iii) health improvements, with a focus on<br />

benefitting the poor for whom the rail represents an especially important mode of transport. The<br />

more frequent service will reduce waiting times, while shorter travel times will flow from the<br />

higher maximum speed potential of the upgraded rolling stock. The reduced passenger waiting<br />

time has been assessed as half a minute per trip on completion of MUTP-1 and as one minute per<br />

trip on completion of both MUTP-1 and MUTP-2A. The average saving in total journey time<br />

would amount to as much as two to six minutes per trip depending on the corridor. Using a train<br />

design similar to the one developed for MUTP-1, an improved suspension system and better<br />

lighting in the trains will provide greater comfort. The improved air ventilation system will have<br />

a positive impact on commuters’ health.<br />

105. The 1,500V DC traction power system incurs significant energy losses. These will be<br />

considerably reduced with the completion of conversion of all lines to 25KV AC traction power.<br />

The conversion will permit running of more services and conversion of nine-car trains to twelvecar<br />

trains. The conversion also promises several other benefits:<br />

(a) Supplying higher levels of power through high-capacity traction substations makes it<br />

possible to run longer trains as well as more trains per hour during the peak period.<br />

(b) The greater power available to trains enables them to accelerate faster and operate at<br />

higher speed, shortening journey times.<br />

(c) A three-phase propulsion system on the new EMU rakes, using modern Integrated Gate<br />

Bipolar Technology, allows regenerative braking, which sends energy back into the wire.<br />

106. In carrying out MUTP-1 MRVC has gained a recognized expertise in managing a<br />

challenging suburban rail development project that required professional expertise in technical<br />

disciplines as well as in interagency coordination and communication. During the last two years<br />

MRVC and its key personnel have earned several national and international awards in these<br />

disciplines. MRVC has also recognized the importance of a comprehensive systems approach for<br />

29


environmental management and social management, and during the preparation of MUTP-2A it<br />

has earned its certification to ISO 14001:2004 and ISO 18001:2004. This second project will<br />

facilitate the continuation of the capacity building effort provided by the <strong>Bank</strong> team during<br />

MUTP-1. The on-going interaction with the <strong>Bank</strong> exposes MRVC and the zonal railways<br />

operating the system to international good practice and emerging ideas. A set of studies will<br />

advise MRVC on specific key topics.<br />

30


Annex 2: Major Related Projects Financed by the <strong>Bank</strong> and/or other Agencies<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

Issue Project Latest Supervision<br />

Ratings<br />

<strong>Bank</strong>-financed, completed or on-going<br />

Implementation PDO<br />

Progress<br />

Capacity expansion of commuter rails, urban <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project MS MS<br />

roads and bus services, and institutional<br />

strengthening of concerned agencies<br />

Capacity expansion of national highways and Allahabad Bypass Project (Ln.4719-IN) Completed S<br />

institutional strengthening of MOSRTH and<br />

NHAI<br />

Lucknow Muzaffarpur National Highway<br />

Project (Ln. 4764-IN)<br />

U<br />

U<br />

Capacity expansion and maintenance of state<br />

highways and institutional development of state<br />

road agencies<br />

Improvements of road infrastructure in a<br />

commercial format<br />

Andhra Pradesh State Highway Project (Ln.<br />

2490-IN)<br />

Completed<br />

Gujarat State Highway Project (Ln.4577-IN) Completed S<br />

Karnataka State Highways Improvement Project<br />

(Ln.4606-IN)<br />

Completed<br />

Kerala State Transport Project (Ln.4563-IN) MU MS<br />

Mizoram State Roads Project (Ln.3618-IN) MS MS<br />

Uttar Pradesh State Roads Project (Ln.4685-IN) S MS<br />

Tamil Nadu Road Sector Project (Ln.4706-IN) S S<br />

Himachal Pradesh State Roads Project<br />

(Ln.4860-IN)<br />

Punjab State Road Project (Ln. S S<br />

Orissa State Road Project (Ln. S S<br />

Support to Infrastructure Leasing and<br />

Financial Services (Ln.3992-IN; Cr.2838-<br />

IN)<br />

MS<br />

S<br />

S<br />

MS<br />

Municipal reforms and investments (including<br />

improvements of urban road infrastructure)<br />

Improvements of urban transport infrastructure<br />

Promotion of public/non-motorized transport and<br />

urban transport capacity building<br />

Other development agencies, completed, ongoing and planned<br />

Japanese <strong>Bank</strong> for International Cooperation<br />

(formerly OECF) - Capacity expansion of Urban<br />

Transport<br />

ADB - TA for Urban Transport<br />

ADB - Capacity expansion of NH and SH and<br />

institutional strengthening of agencies<br />

Karnataka Municipal Services Project (Ln.<br />

4818-IN)<br />

Tamil Nadu Urban Development Project<br />

(Ln.4798-IN)<br />

Sustainable Urban Transport Project (SUTP)<br />

(Project ID P100589)<br />

Delhi Metro Rail Project<br />

Development of national urban transport<br />

guidance and identification and preparation<br />

of a Urban Transport investment project<br />

National Highway Corridor I, Surat-Manor<br />

Tollway Project, Chattisgarh State Roads<br />

Project, National Highway Corridor II, MP<br />

State Roads Project<br />

Effective<br />

On going<br />

On going<br />

On going<br />

31


ADB- Improvements of urban roads in major<br />

Kerala cities<br />

UNDP- Capacity development for national and<br />

local governments<br />

Kerala Sustainable Urban Development<br />

Project<br />

India capacity development program<br />

Ratings: HS (Highly Satisfactory), S (Satisfactory), MS (Moderately Satisfactory), U (Unsatisfactory), MU<br />

(Moderately Unsatisfactory), HU (Highly Unsatisfactory)<br />

On going<br />

On going<br />

32


Annex 3: Results Framework and Monitoring<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

Results Framework<br />

PDO Project Outcome Indicators Use of Project Outcome<br />

Information<br />

To improve the passenger carrying<br />

capacity, operational efficiency,<br />

1. Additional capacity - Vehicle km per day during<br />

morning peak hours (8.30-11.30 a.m.)<br />

To assess the project’s<br />

contribution to the PDO<br />

level of comfort of, and the<br />

institutional capacity of entities<br />

2. Reduction in peak hour overcrowding – average<br />

number of passengers per 12-car train<br />

involved in, the suburban rail system<br />

of <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan area.<br />

3. Reduction in journey times – average transit<br />

times in minutes<br />

4. Reduction in energy consumption – average<br />

energy consumption per 12-car train-km<br />

(kWh/t/km)<br />

5. Action plan on trespassing and safety prepared<br />

6. Action plan on revenue improvement prepared<br />

Intermediate Outcomes Intermediate Outcome Indicators Use of Intermediate<br />

1. Train operation performance 1.1. Trains per hour<br />

1.2. Length of trains<br />

1.3. EMU 12-car trains in service (258 trains)<br />

1.4. Ridership per day<br />

1.5. Punctuality – percentage of trains reaching less<br />

than five minutes late to destination<br />

2. Infrastructure and equipment 2.1. DC to AC conversion (1577 TKM)<br />

2.2. Additional Track (181 TKM)<br />

3. Institutional development and<br />

capacity building<br />

3.1. Study on potential for ISO 14001 at CR and<br />

WR completed<br />

3.2. Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban development plan<br />

completed<br />

3.3. TA for IR strategy carried out<br />

3.4. Continued MRVC ISO Certification<br />

Outcome Monitoring<br />

To assess the performance of the<br />

project and to redirect it, if<br />

necessary, to achieve the PDO<br />

33


Project Outcome Indicators<br />

1. Vehicle km per day during<br />

morning peak hours (8-11<br />

a.m.)<br />

2. Reduction in overcrowding<br />

(passengers per 12-car<br />

train)<br />

3. Reduction in journey times –<br />

transit times in minutes<br />

reduced<br />

4. Average energy consumption<br />

per 12-car train-km<br />

(kWh/t/km)<br />

5. Action plan on trespassing<br />

and safety prepared<br />

6. Action plan on revenue<br />

improvement prepared<br />

Intermediate Outcome Indicators<br />

1.1. Trains per hour during peak<br />

hour<br />

1.2. Length of trains ( percent of<br />

12-car trains)<br />

1.3. EMU Fleet size (12-car<br />

rakes in service)<br />

Comment<br />

Corridor:<br />

WR<br />

CR (ML)<br />

CR (Harbor)<br />

Corridor:<br />

WR<br />

CR<br />

Harbor<br />

WR Through Churchgate to Virar<br />

WR Local Churchgate to Borivali<br />

CR Through CSTM to Kalyan<br />

CR Local CSTM to Thane<br />

Harbor Local CSTM to Panvel<br />

Calculated using consumption per<br />

motor car (MC) type:<br />

kWh/MC/km for DC = 4.94<br />

kWh/MC/km for AC/DC = 3.19<br />

Corridor:<br />

WR Through<br />

WR Local<br />

CR Through<br />

CR Local<br />

Harbor Local<br />

Corridor:<br />

WR Through<br />

WR Local<br />

CR Through<br />

CR Local<br />

1.4. Ridership per day Figures in thousands<br />

Central <strong>Railway</strong><br />

Western <strong>Railway</strong><br />

Arrangements for results monitoring<br />

Baseline<br />

01.04.09<br />

561,461<br />

447,578<br />

151,001<br />

5400<br />

4800<br />

4200<br />

81<br />

65<br />

59<br />

56<br />

December<br />

2012<br />

End of<br />

MUTP-2A<br />

(2014)<br />

815,400<br />

777,050<br />

182,646<br />

4000<br />

4000<br />

4000<br />

75<br />

62<br />

54<br />

53<br />

Reports<br />

Frequency<br />

Yearly<br />

reports<br />

Yearly<br />

reports<br />

Yearly<br />

reports<br />

77<br />

75<br />

17.62 12.76 Yearly<br />

reports<br />

-- Action plan<br />

prepared<br />

-- Action plan<br />

prepared<br />

(October<br />

2013)<br />

16<br />

17<br />

14.4<br />

14.4<br />

16.4<br />

Action plan<br />

prepared<br />

Action plan<br />

prepared<br />

18<br />

18<br />

18<br />

18<br />

18<br />

100%<br />

100%<br />

100%<br />

100%<br />

Yearly<br />

reports<br />

Yearly<br />

reports<br />

190 258 Yearly<br />

reports<br />

3592<br />

3298<br />

93.2%<br />

98.2%<br />

3797<br />

3486<br />

94%<br />

98.5%<br />

Yearly<br />

reports<br />

Data Collection<br />

Instruments<br />

Working timetable<br />

of WR and CR and<br />

operational<br />

statistics<br />

Ridership/<br />

occupancy survey<br />

of commuters<br />

Working timetable<br />

of WR and CR and<br />

operational<br />

statistics<br />

Operational<br />

Statistics<br />

Final Report<br />

Final Report<br />

Working timetable<br />

of WR and CR and<br />

operational<br />

statistics<br />

Working timetable<br />

of WR and CR and<br />

operational<br />

statistics<br />

Performance<br />

statistics of<br />

<strong>Railway</strong>s and<br />

inspection<br />

Performance<br />

statistics of<br />

<strong>Railway</strong>s<br />

Responsibility<br />

for Data<br />

Collection<br />

MRVC<br />

MRVC<br />

MRVC<br />

MRVC<br />

MRVC<br />

Rly Board,<br />

MRVC<br />

1.5. Punctuality – percentage of Central <strong>Railway</strong><br />

Yearly Performance MRVC<br />

trains reaching less than five Western <strong>Railway</strong><br />

reports statistics of<br />

minutes late to destination<br />

<strong>Railway</strong>s<br />

2.1. DC to AC conversion (Track 569 1577 Yearly Performance MRVC<br />

34<br />

MRVC<br />

MRVC<br />

MRVC<br />

MRVC


KM) reports statistics of<br />

<strong>Railway</strong>s<br />

2.2. Additional track (TKM) -- 181 km Yearly<br />

reports<br />

Performance<br />

statistics of<br />

3.1. Study on potential for ISO<br />

14001 at CR and WR<br />

completed<br />

3.2. Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban<br />

development plan<br />

completed<br />

3.3. TA for IR strategy carried<br />

out<br />

3.4. Continued MRVC ISO<br />

Certification<br />

-- Study<br />

completed<br />

-- Study<br />

completed<br />

<strong>Railway</strong>s<br />

Final Report<br />

Final Report<br />

MRVC<br />

MRVC<br />

MRVC<br />

-- TA completed Final Report Rly Board,<br />

MRVC<br />

MRVC<br />

certified<br />

ISO 14001,<br />

ISO 18001<br />

Certification<br />

Yearly Certification<br />

<strong>Document</strong><br />

MRVC<br />

35


Annex 4: Detailed Project Description<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project 2A<br />

(Cost: US$970.5 million with IBRD’s share of US$430 million)<br />

107. The proposed MUTP-2A consists of the procurement of 72 additional twelve-car<br />

EMU trains, completion of conversion from 1500V DC to 25kV AC traction on the remaining<br />

sections of Central <strong>Railway</strong>, expansion of maintenance facilities for EMUs and provision of<br />

stabling lines for the additional EMU trains included in the project. Some technical assistance<br />

studies are also included in the project. The planned implementation period is five years,<br />

commencing in early 2010 and completing all components by the middle of 2014.<br />

108. The various components of MUTP-2A are as under:<br />

Component 1: Rolling Stock Fleet Increase:<br />

(Cost: US$659.6 million with IBRD’s share of US$355.7 million)*<br />

109. At the end of MUTP-1, <strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Suburban System (MRSS) will have<br />

2260 EMU cars. Based on the Time Table prepared through simulation of train operation this<br />

holding will need to increase to 2980 cars for full use of the infrastructure created under MUTP-<br />

1 and by IR already. Thus, procurement of electrical equipment as kits for 864 EMU cars and<br />

application of these on trains manufactured at ICF, Chennai is included. Since by the time these<br />

trains are delivered and put in service the entire DC to AC conversion would have taken place,<br />

unlike the EMU rakes procured under MUTP-1, there will be no need for dual voltage rakes<br />

capable of operation on DC as well as AC systems. Hence these rakes will be for use on 25kV<br />

AC system only. The prototype supply of kits, manufacture of prototype rakes, and prototype<br />

testing will take another 12-15 months. The series supply of kits would thus materialize about<br />

two years after issue of bid documents. If the procurement process starts in early 2010, the<br />

delivery of kits will commence by 2012.<br />

110. The <strong>Bank</strong> loan will finance procurement of equipment for 864 EMU cars (72 trains<br />

of 12 cars each). The manufacture of trains at ICF, Chennai will be funded by counterpart funds.<br />

The manufacture of EMU cars against MUTP-2A would commence from early 2011 after the<br />

manufacture of EMU cars against MUTP-1 and another IR contract for EMU cars has been<br />

completed by the end of 2010. The delivery of 72 trains shall be completed by the February<br />

2015.<br />

Component 2: DC to AC Conversion (including Signal and Telecom improvements):<br />

(Cost: US$173.8 million with IBRD’s share of US$55.2 million)<br />

111. This component covers the conversion of electric traction system from 1500V DC<br />

to 25kV AC on the Central <strong>Railway</strong> over 172 track km (CSTM to Thane, CSTM to Tilaknagar<br />

and Mahim to Wadala Road sections). This comprises modification of overhead catenary, setting<br />

up of traction power sub-stations at Sion, Chinchpokli, Wadala Road and Thane, along with<br />

switching stations, procurement of catenary maintenance equipment and modifications to signal<br />

36


and telecom systems to make it compatible with AC traction. The conversion will permit<br />

enhanced power supply for additional services and longer trains consisting of 12 cars.<br />

112. The <strong>Bank</strong> loan will finance off line works such as setting up of new traction substations<br />

and switching posts at Sion and Chinchpokli between <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST and Vidyavihar,<br />

procurement of Digital Axle Counters (DAC) on <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST-Thane section, and other left over<br />

sections of MUTP-1, and catenary maintenance equipment. Additional setting up of two new<br />

traction substations at Wadala Road and Thane on Vidyavihar- Thane and <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST-Tilak<br />

Nagar section and other online works, such as modification to catenary system, quad cables and<br />

signaling system, will be executed by Central <strong>Railway</strong> through government funding.<br />

113. The conversion is planned to be completed by 2012-13. Apart from providing<br />

capacity to run more and longer trains the conversion will reduce cost of maintenance of power<br />

supply installations and transmission losses. There would also be significant energy saving due<br />

to higher potential for re-generation of power in case of 25 kV AC system in comparison to the<br />

1500V DC system.<br />

Component 3: EMU maintenance facilities and stabling lines:<br />

(Cost: US$117.7 million with IBRD’s share of Nil)<br />

114. New stabling lines to accommodate the additional trains will be constructed. The<br />

existing EMU maintenance depot at Kurla on Central <strong>Railway</strong> and the maintenance shed at Virar<br />

constructed under MUTP-1 will accommodate new stabling lines. In total, the project<br />

component comprises 73 new stabling lines, 34 (including four extensions from 9-car to 12-car)<br />

on Western <strong>Railway</strong> at Virar, Borivali and Vasai Road and 39 on Central <strong>Railway</strong> at Sion,<br />

Thakurli, Kasara, Khopoli, Belapur, Panvel, Ambernath, Karjat, Titwala and Kurla. The<br />

maintenance facilities for the additional coaches being inducted will be provided by augmenting<br />

the capacity in the five existing maintenance sheds (at <strong>Mumbai</strong> Central and Kandivali on<br />

Western <strong>Railway</strong> and Kurla, Kalva and Sanpada on Central <strong>Railway</strong>) and the two existing<br />

periodic overhaul workshops (Mahalaxmi on Western <strong>Railway</strong> and Matunga on Central<br />

<strong>Railway</strong>). Expansion of the new maintenance shed at Virar under construction in MUTP-1 is also<br />

included. No new shed or workshop is planned at this stage. Details of number of stabling lines<br />

at each location and and of the maintenance facilities are given in the MUTP-2A Implementation<br />

manual. This component is not funded by the <strong>Bank</strong> loan. The works are expected to be<br />

completed by the end of 2013.<br />

Component 4: Technical Assistance:<br />

(Cost:US$14.6 million with IBRD’s share of US$14.4 million)<br />

(a) Strategic Plans for Sustainable Expansion of Rail Services.<br />

1. Development Program for <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban Rail Services<br />

115. The TranSforM study recently completed by MMRDA outlines proposals for the<br />

transport network development, including the suburban rail network, to 2031 to meet the forecast<br />

travel demand. MRVC, Central and Western <strong>Railway</strong>s have put forward proposals for rail<br />

service development beyond the current project as an initial stage in realizing the 2031 network<br />

and services. Based on these proposals and in coherency with TranSforM recommendations, the<br />

37


proposed study will prepare a set of proposals for the staged expansion of network capacity of<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail system (integrated with other modes) and improvement of the quality of<br />

service to passengers to provide for seamless convenient travel by public transport. Key<br />

investments proposed for investment after this project in the period 2016 -2021 will then be the<br />

subject of a pre-Feasibility Study. The output of this study would be a costed, time based<br />

development plan for the suburban rail system to the year 2031, and a pre-feasibility study of the<br />

investments proposed for the period 2016 – 2021. The study will be implemented by MRVC.<br />

Target Completion Date: By October 2013. Proposed cost: US$5.4 million.<br />

2. Provision to support the development of the Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s long term strategy<br />

for Suburban Rail<br />

116. The recently produced Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s’ Vision 2020 document includes a strategy<br />

for suburban rail services. This technical assistance includes a provision for a series of studies<br />

and advisory services to assist Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s in developing the suburban services dimension of<br />

their long term strategy. This effort will include consideration for replication to other cities of the<br />

model developed with MRVC in <strong>Mumbai</strong>. It will also include considerations of institutional and<br />

policy improvements to improve further the efficiency of <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail services and<br />

their better integration within the overall regional urban transport system. <strong>Mumbai</strong> study will in<br />

particular take into account the physical segregation that will be achieved at the end of MUTP-<br />

2A and B between suburban and national passenger tracks. This technical assistance will be<br />

procured by MRVC and managed by the Indian <strong>Railway</strong> Board. Target Completion Date: By<br />

June 2014. Proposed cost: US$1.6 million.<br />

3. Revenue maximizing study in particular for non-fare box revenues with<br />

affordability study<br />

117. At present, most of the revenue on the suburban rail system comes from the sale of<br />

tickets. This revenue is insufficient to cover operating costs and the growing financial gap is<br />

covered by financial transfer from other rail business segments. The study will examine potential<br />

non-fare revenues including from advertising, rental of commercial spaces at stations and<br />

property development at stations and on other railway land (talking account to the study<br />

undertaken in MUTP-1). The potential for indirect user charges will also be examined, including<br />

payroll taxes and increased property taxes in areas around stations (taking account of work<br />

carried out as part of the TranSforM Study). The study will also review the socio-economic<br />

profile of customers and examine the justification for financial cross-support from other<br />

economic agents as well as the potential for fare adjustment in relation with affordability and<br />

service quality. The output of the study will be a strategy to improve the financial sustainability<br />

of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail operation and a suggested list of options, with estimates of potential<br />

revenue, a pre – FS level costed and time based implementation schedule, including any<br />

institutional and regulatory changes that may be required. The study will be procured by MRVC<br />

and managed by Indian <strong>Railway</strong> Board. Target Completion Date: By October 2013. Proposed<br />

cost: US$1.1 million.<br />

(b) Tactical programs for improving passenger convenience and information<br />

4. More efficient and user friendly ticket issuing<br />

38


118. 75 percent of people buying tickets for a rail journey purchase a separate ticket for<br />

each journey. This is time consuming and confusing for passengers as there are seven or eight<br />

different combinations of ticket systems and ways to purchase these tickets. This leads to<br />

maintenance problems and passenger complaints when machines break down. This TA will<br />

review the current arrangements, and develop functional specifications for ticketing machines<br />

and associated operational arrangements for issuing single journey tickets, with the potential to<br />

also issue passes (multi trip tickets). These ticketing arrangements should be compatible with<br />

existing and proposed arrangements for single journey tickets on other modes (bus, metro).<br />

Options will be examined and recommendations made which would be compatible with the<br />

Integrated Fares and Ticketing System for MMR being developed by MMRDA. The output will<br />

be a recommended system with a pre – FS level costed and time based implementation schedule.<br />

The study will be implemented by MRVC. Target Completion Date: By September 2013.<br />

Proposed cost: US$0.5 million.<br />

5. Passenger information and security<br />

119. The present system of Passenger Information and Guidance consisting of Audio<br />

Announcements, Train Information Display systems, and Clocks has been provided in a discrete<br />

manner requiring each item to have separate Operation and Control, wiring and other features.<br />

The station Signage for Passenger guidance is not to International standards. The Station and<br />

Platform area illumination including Concourse at major stations also needs to be upgraded<br />

keeping in view the optimum level of illumination to meet both aesthetic and energy saving<br />

requirements. For Video Surveillance of Station Entrances and Exits from security point of<br />

view, an integrated system needs to be designed with both Central and Remote Video<br />

Surveillance Monitoring features. The TA will identify the deficiencies in the existing system<br />

and taking into consideration the experience of comparable foreign Suburban Rail Systems<br />

recommend an integrated state-of-the-art Passenger Information and Guidance, Station and<br />

Platform area Illumination and Security Surveillance System. The TA will then prepare the<br />

technical specifications and cost estimate for the recommended solution. The study will be<br />

implemented by MRVC. Target Completion Date: By September 2013. Proposed cost: US$0.5<br />

million.<br />

(c) Tactical plans for improving safety and environmental management of operations<br />

6. Reduction of trespassing and improvement of safety of the track<br />

120. A large number of deaths and serious injuries occur daily due to passengers and<br />

other pedestrians being struck by trains while crossing the railway tracks in the station area or<br />

between stations. This study will analyze the data on these and will suggest remedial measures.<br />

These could include construction of user friendly grade separated crossings (subway/foot overbridges)<br />

combined with fencing and other barricades to restrict crossing of the track. The output<br />

would be a costed and time based program of remedial measures. The study will be implemented<br />

by MRVC. Target Completion Date: By December 2012. Proposed cost: US$0.1 million<br />

(Counterpart funded).<br />

7. Improved Environmental Management of Rail Operations<br />

121. MRVC has significantly improved the environmental management of its activities<br />

which are certified to be in compliance with ISO 14001. Central and Western <strong>Railway</strong>s have<br />

39


egun the process of certification of their ancillary installations, including car sheds and<br />

workshops using their own resources.<br />

122. This proposed activity will facilitate improvements to environmental performance<br />

of each type of installation beyond the regulatory requirements. It will cover the workshops, car<br />

sheds, and stations within Western <strong>Railway</strong> and Central <strong>Railway</strong>. The initial focus would be<br />

better water management and energy conservation. At the workshop, car shed, etc. the focus will<br />

be on water recycling, reuse and disposal of oily wastes along with establishing the feasibility of<br />

use of more energy efficient devices such as compressors, lights, and other equipment. At<br />

stations, techniques and incentives for ensuring cleaner stations and surroundings would be<br />

explored. The output of the study will be a series of specific actions to improve environmental<br />

performance at these locations, rated according to their efficiency and ease to implement,<br />

following consultations with the participating <strong>Railway</strong>s. The study will be implemented by<br />

MRVC. Target Completion Date: By December 2012. Proposed cost: US$0.5 million.<br />

(d) Capacity Building for Increased Operational Efficiency<br />

8. Power Supply Simulation<br />

123. Estimates of power supply requirements are needed for the expansion of services.<br />

Design of the most cost effective and efficient power supply depends on the use of computer<br />

based simulation software. This TA provides for the supply and installation of software,<br />

calibration to <strong>Mumbai</strong> conditions, training of staff in its use and assisting MRVC staff to run a<br />

minimum of two scenarios to ensure it is running effectively. The TA will be implemented by<br />

MRVC. Target Completion Date: By December 2013. Proposed cost: US$0.9 million.<br />

9. Rail Operations Simulation<br />

124. Optimizing the number of trains that can run on the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban system<br />

requires operations simulation software which uses inputs related to the characteristics of the<br />

infrastructure and the trains. MRVC is currently using software developed by the railways that<br />

dates from 1996-98 and requires too much input data, staff time and computation time to produce<br />

the desired results. This TA provides for the supply and installation of software, calibration to<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> conditions, training of staff in its use and assisting MRVC staff to run a minimum of<br />

two scenarios to ensure it is running effectively. The TA will be implemented by MRVC.<br />

Target Completion Date: By December 2012. Proposed cost: US$0.6 million.<br />

(e) Training<br />

125. Even though MRVC has successfully executed projects worth US$800 million, it<br />

recognizes the need to continuously improve the skills of its staff, and those of Central and<br />

Western <strong>Railway</strong>s with whom it interacts. To make project execution more effective and<br />

efficient, it wishes to ensure staff can be trained in best practices followed elsewhere in the<br />

world, in subjects including Financial Management, Project Management, Procurement as well<br />

as Technical engineering, Social, Environmental protection and Communication. This<br />

subcomponent provides funding for the development and delivery in <strong>Mumbai</strong> of training<br />

programs in these and other subjects, as well as domestic and limited international study tours<br />

based on Training Plans to be prepared and submitted annually to WB by MRVC. The<br />

40


completion date of training programs in the closing date of the project. Proposed cost: US$3.2<br />

million.<br />

41


Annex 5: Project Costs<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

Table 1. Project Costs and Financing by Components<br />

(Local Crore)<br />

(US$ million)<br />

Project Component Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total<br />

Component 1<br />

Rolling Stock Fleet Increase 2,377.0 553.0 2,930 535.1 124.5 659.6<br />

Component 2<br />

DC to AC Conversion 686.3 85.8 772 154.5 19.3 173.8<br />

Component 3<br />

EMU Maintenance Facilities<br />

and Stabling Lines<br />

523.0 - 523 117.7 - 117.7<br />

Component 4<br />

Technical Assistance 7.4 57.6 65 1.7 13.0 14.6<br />

Total Project Costs 3627.7 662.3 4,290 816.7 149.1 965.8<br />

Front-end Fee - 4.775 4.775 - 1.075 1.075<br />

Unallocated<br />

- 16.3 16.3 - 3.7 3.7<br />

Total Financing Sought 3627.7 683.4 4,311.1 816.7 153.8 970.5<br />

Note: Physical and price contingencies are all included<br />

Table 2. Project Cost by Components and Financiers<br />

(US$ Million)<br />

Project Component<br />

IBRD<br />

Loan<br />

%<br />

IBRD<br />

CPF %<br />

CPF<br />

% of<br />

Total<br />

Total<br />

Cost<br />

Component 1<br />

Rolling Stock Fleet Increase 355.7 83 303.9 56 68 659.6<br />

Component 2<br />

DC to AC Conversion 55.2 13 118.6 22 18 173.8<br />

Component 3<br />

EMU Maintenance Facilities<br />

and Stabling Lines 0 0 117.7 22 12 117.7<br />

Component 4<br />

Technical Assistance 14.4 3 0.2 0 2 14.6<br />

Total Project Costs 425.3 98.9 540.5 100 99.5 965.8<br />

Front-end Fee 1.075 0.25 - - 0.11 1.075<br />

Unallocated 3.7 0.85 - - 0.38 3.7<br />

Total Financing Sought 430 100 540.5 100 100 970.5<br />

Note: Physical and price contingencies are all included<br />

1. Assuming INR/US$ exchange rate = 44.42<br />

2. Identifiable taxes and duties are US$97 million, and the total financing need, with front-end fee and net of<br />

taxes is US$970.5 million. Therefore, the share of project cost net of taxes is 90 percent.<br />

42


Rolling Stock Fleet Increase<br />

Table 3. Outlay of Project by Years<br />

(US$ Million)<br />

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Total<br />

EMU Manufacture - - 20.8 62.5 119.4 101.2 303.9<br />

EMU Electrics - - 41.7 104.2 117.9 91.9 355.7<br />

Subtotal 0 0 62.5 166.7 237.3 193.1 659.6<br />

DC to AC Conversion<br />

Digital Axle Counter and Quad<br />

cable<br />

` 1.6 5.3 4.8 4 - 15.7<br />

Traction substations at<br />

Chinchpokli and Sion and six<br />

Switching posts<br />

Supply and installation of 110<br />

kV cables for Chinchpokli and<br />

Sion traction substations<br />

- 2.2 4.9 5.1 3.5 - 15.7<br />

- 2.8 1.8 1.3 0.6 - 6.5<br />

OHE Maintenance Car - - 1.1 6.3 5.6 4.3 17.3<br />

Non <strong>Bank</strong> Funded Works 2.2 35.1 21.8 20.6 19.1 19.8 118.6<br />

Subtotal 2.2 41.7 34.9 38.1 32.8 24.1 173.8<br />

EMU Maintenance Facilities and Stabling Lines<br />

EMU Maintenance Facilities - 20.5 20.8 20.9 9.2 71.4<br />

EMU Stabling Lines - 6.7 15.1 13.9 10.2 0.5 46.4<br />

Subtotal 0 27.2 35.9 34.8 19.4 0.5 117.7<br />

Technical Assistance<br />

<strong>Bank</strong> Funded TA - - 1.8 5.4 5.4 1.8 14.4<br />

Non-<strong>Bank</strong> Funded TA - - - 0.2 - - 0.2<br />

Subtotal 0 0 1.8 5.6 5.4 1.8 14.6<br />

Total Project Costs 2.2 68.9 135.1 245.2 294.9 219.5 965.8<br />

Note: Physical and price contingencies are all included<br />

43


Annex 6: Implementation Arrangements<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

126. MRVC is the project implementing agency for MUTP-2A and in that role is<br />

accountable for satisfactory completion of all the works of MUTP-2A. MMRDA, ICF, RDSO,<br />

WR and CR 30 are executing agencies. As the project implementing agency, MRVC is<br />

responsible for financing and procurement of all the contracts financed by the loan, including<br />

major equipment such as rolling stock/AC-DC equipment/cables, etc. as also for executing<br />

certain identified works in the field with due safeguards in consultation with the Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s.<br />

MOUs which incorporate insurance to respect EMP, time line of works and activities to be<br />

carried out by respective agencies, etc. will be set up between MRVC and the executing<br />

agencies.<br />

127. The execution of new line works which interfere with the running railway and<br />

require extensive block working are to be specifically listed out and carried out by the concerned<br />

Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s. The new lines work which interfere with the running railway only at the track<br />

linking on the two ends can be executed by MRVC with due safeguards.<br />

128. The works included in MUTP-2A have been selected to ensure that there is<br />

minimal Resettlement and Rehabilitation or land acquisition involved. This resettlement, which<br />

is expected to be very limited in extend, will be executed out by MMRDA, as per specific<br />

conditions stated in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between MRVC and MMRDA 31 .<br />

129. Role of MRVC: Chart 1 below illustrates MRVC’s role as implementing agency of<br />

MUTP-2A.<br />

30 Central <strong>Railway</strong> and Western <strong>Railway</strong> are two of the largest and busiest of the 16 zones of Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s. Their<br />

respective divisions <strong>Mumbai</strong> CSTM and <strong>Mumbai</strong> are specifically involved in this project. Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s is a<br />

department owned and controlled by the Government of India, via the Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s. IR manufactures much<br />

of its rolling stock and heavy engineering components at its six manufacturing plants, called Production Units,<br />

which are managed directly by the ministry. Integral Coach Factory at Chennai (ICF) is one of these. Each of the<br />

six production units is headed by a General Manager, who reports directly to the <strong>Railway</strong> Board. Research Design<br />

and Standards Organization (RDSO) is a research and development organization under the Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s,<br />

which functions as a technical adviser and consultant to the <strong>Railway</strong> Board, the Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s, the <strong>Railway</strong><br />

Production Units in respect of design and standardization of railway equipment and problems related to railway<br />

construction, operation and maintenance.<br />

31 MMRDA is a body of the Government of Maharashtra set up under the <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region<br />

Development Authority Act, 1974 Government of Maharashtra as an apex body for planning and co-ordination of<br />

development activities in the Region.<br />

44


Sr.<br />

No.<br />

130. The implementation arrangement for MUTP-2A will be as under:<br />

Work<br />

Implementing<br />

Agency<br />

Executing<br />

Agency<br />

Funding<br />

Arrangement<br />

Likely<br />

completion<br />

by<br />

(A) Goods/Supply and Installation<br />

1. EMU procurement/ manufacture<br />

1.1 Procurement of electrics MRVC MRVC WB Loan June 2014<br />

1.2 Manufacture MRVC ICF Counterpart Feb. 2015<br />

1.3 Design aspect MRVC RDSO -- --<br />

2. DC to AC Conversion<br />

Electrical Works<br />

2.1 Traction substations and switching MRVC MRVC WB Loan Dec. 2012<br />

posts between CSTM-Vidyavihar<br />

section<br />

2.2 Laying of 110 kV cable at Sion and MRVC MRVC WB Loan Jan. 2012<br />

Chinchpokli<br />

2.3 Procurement of OHE maintenance<br />

equipment<br />

MRVC MRVC WB Loan June 2014<br />

2.4 Traction substations and switching<br />

posts between Vidyavihar-Thane<br />

section<br />

2.5 Laying of 110 kV cable at Thane and<br />

Vadala Road<br />

2.6 OHE modification from 1500V DC to<br />

25 kV AC<br />

S&T Works<br />

2.7 Procurement, installation and<br />

commissioning of Digital Axle<br />

Counters<br />

MRVC CR Counterpart Dec. 2013<br />

MRVC CR Counterpart Dec. 2013<br />

MRVC CR Counterpart Dec. 2013<br />

MRVC MRVC WB Loan Dec. 2012<br />

2.8 Procurement of Quad cable MRVC CR Counterpart Dec. 2012<br />

2.9 Laying of cable MRVC CR Counterpart Dec. 2013<br />

(B) Works<br />

3 Maintenance facilities and stabling lines<br />

for EMUs<br />

3.1 Maintenance facilities for EMUs MRVC CR/WR Counterpart Dec. 2013<br />

3.2 Stabling Lines for EMUs<br />

Central <strong>Railway</strong><br />

Western <strong>Railway</strong><br />

MRVC<br />

CR<br />

MRVC<br />

Counterpart<br />

Counterpart<br />

Dec. 2013<br />

Dec. 2013<br />

(C) Technical Assistance<br />

4. Technical Assistance Studies MRVC MRVC WB Loan* June 2014<br />

* With the exception of MUTP2A-TA6: Reduction of trespassing and improvement of safety of the track, which is<br />

fully counterpart funded.<br />

45


Chart 1. Implementation Arrangements for MUTP-2A<br />

46


131. Responsibilities of MRVC (Project Management Unit): MRVC is the nodal<br />

organization for implementing MUTP-2A on behalf of Govt. of India and Govt. of Maharashtra.<br />

Following will the responsibilities of MRVC:<br />

(a) To monitor and evaluate the project;<br />

(b) To coordinate the implementation of the project;<br />

(c) To prepare and forward periodical reports covering physical and financial progress;<br />

(d) To prepare implementation completion report;<br />

(e) To undertake necessary surveys and studies for project evaluation.<br />

132. Responsibilities of Maharashtra and MMRDA: implementation responsibilities of<br />

the Government of Maharashtra include the following:<br />

(a) be responsible, through the MMRDA and in cooperation with MRVC, for carrying out<br />

Project activities related to social management, including carrying out land acquisition<br />

and resettlement and rehabilitation activities (including preparation and implementation<br />

of RAPs), if any; and<br />

(b) facilitate the preparation and carrying out of relevant studies and related activities and<br />

recommendations under Component 4 of the Project.<br />

133. Project Director of MUTP-2A: Director (Technical), MRVC is Project Director<br />

for MUTP-2A for overall monitoring and coordination of the project. He will be responsible to<br />

coordinate various agencies such as Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s, Ministry of Finance, Planning<br />

Commission, <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>, GOM, RDSO, ICF, CR, WR and other different agencies.<br />

134. Staffing at MRVC: MRVC will consist of a team of professionals specializing in<br />

the following areas:<br />

(a) Finance;<br />

(b) Procurement;<br />

(c) Environment and social;<br />

(d) Training;<br />

(e) Institutional development;<br />

(f) Engineering;<br />

135. These professionals could either be staff deputed from MOR or could be<br />

outsourced from the open market. In addition, services of retired railway employees may also be<br />

engaged in successful implementation of the project. The organizational structure of MRVC<br />

is given in Chart 2 below.<br />

136. Training of MRVC employees: The training of the MRVC employees are made to<br />

familiarize with the procedures and methods as part of this project. MRVC will also arrange a<br />

need based training program as and when required for each area of specialization.<br />

47


Chart 2. Organizational Chart for MRVC<br />

Officers - 58<br />

Assisting Staff - 137<br />

Total - 195<br />

48


Annex 6A: Governance and Accountability Action Plan (GAAP)<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

137. The context for the preparation of the Governance and Accountability Action Plan<br />

(GAAP) is the recognition by the MRVC and the <strong>Bank</strong> of the need to improve accountability<br />

arrangements to reduce the chances of corruption and enhance transparency in implementation of<br />

MUTP-2A. The GAAP has been prepared taking into consideration key risks that may be<br />

encountered during implementation of the project, relevant issues identified from the Guidance<br />

Note on Transport Sector GAAP, lessons learned from MUTP-1 and the measures that are<br />

already/would be in place to mitigate the impact of these risks on achievement of the project<br />

development objectives.<br />

138. The GAAP seeks to build upon the GOI’s efforts and existing systems such as the<br />

Right to Information Act (RTIA, 2005), initiatives of the Central Vigilance Commission in<br />

enhancing transparency, and various measures already institutionalized by MRVC. It is<br />

premised on enhanced policies, procedures, institutions and capacity for better governance. The<br />

underlying assumption is that such mechanisms will enable increased public scrutiny of the<br />

project, better address stakeholder concerns and thereby enhance accountability.<br />

Key Governance Risks<br />

139. Based on a review of existing procedures, policies, processes and institutional<br />

capacity at MRVC, Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s, and applicable GoI rules and regulations, the following<br />

have been identified as the critical risks in project implementation:<br />

(a) Weak disclosure of project information leading to low stakeholder participation and<br />

accountability<br />

(b) Weak complaint and grievance redressal mechanisms<br />

(c) Risk of collusion, fraud and corruption in procurement<br />

(d) Weak internal audit and control procedures leading to risk of financial irregularities<br />

(e) Weak institutional capacity for project implementation<br />

(f) Weak coordination leading to risk of inordinate delays in physical progress of works<br />

(g) Implementation delays due to socio-political interference<br />

Some Opportunities<br />

140. MRVC has a pro-active vigilance unit headed by a Chief Vigilance Officer (CVO)<br />

(part-time), who is assisted by a Deputy CVO and a Chief Vigilance Inspector (part-time). This<br />

unit works in close coordination with the Vigilance Department of the Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s and<br />

the Central Vigilance Commission. It has been actively focusing on preventive vigilance, system<br />

improvements through short inspirational video films with anti-corruption messages, interactive<br />

presentations and discussions on complex contract management issues. The unit also publishes a<br />

monthly newsletter “Prahari” (Sentinel) and organizes annual events such as vigilance quiz,<br />

caption contests, debates and essay competitions to raise awareness about fraud and corruption<br />

amongst the staff.<br />

49


141. To enhance transparency and fairness in procurement, MRVC proposes to<br />

introduce Integrity Pacts during 2009-2010 in association with Transparency International and<br />

the Central Vigilance Commission on all its contracts.<br />

142. MRVC has obtained ISO9001 certification for quality of operations. On each of<br />

the contracts proposed in MUTP-2A, quality control would be as shown in the table below:<br />

S.No. Contract Quality Control<br />

1 Supply and laying of 110 kV cable MRVC, Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />

2 DAC RDSO<br />

3 EMU Procurement Prototype by RDSO; routine inspection by Resident<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> Advisor in country of manufacture<br />

4 Installation and commissioning of<br />

TSS/switching posts<br />

5 Procurement of machinery and plant<br />

for OHE maintenance<br />

RITES India <strong>Ltd</strong>., RDSO (if prototype)<br />

Resident <strong>Railway</strong> Advisor in country of manufacture<br />

(as needed)<br />

In addition, MRVC has already been engaging various third parties/technical bodies for technical<br />

reviews/assessments during execution of MUTP-1 and envisages similar engagements in MUTP-<br />

2A, as necessary.<br />

143. Through MUTP-1, MRVC has developed the ability to liaise effectively with the<br />

several departments and agencies of the IR (Board, Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s, RDSO, ICF), the GOM etc.<br />

which would considerably reduce the risk of delays in coordination and decision-making in<br />

MUTP-2A. MRVC conducts meetings of the coordination committee every 45 days with the<br />

zonal railways and other executing agencies to discuss pending issues on MUTP-1, and<br />

envisages continuation of such coordination meetings on MUTP-2A as well. In addition, the<br />

MRVC reports to the <strong>Railway</strong> Board monthly on each aspect of projects under implementation.<br />

In the annual ratings of PSUs by the GoI's Department of Public Enterprises under Ministry of<br />

Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises, MRVC's performance has been rated as very good<br />

(2007-08) and excellent (2008-09), which also points to better coordination as well.<br />

144. Financial management systems in MRVC comprising budgeting, accounting,<br />

internal controls, financial reporting and auditing were put in place during the implementation of<br />

MUTP-1. Following a Corporate Governance and Financial Accountability assessment by the<br />

<strong>Bank</strong>, MRVC has formulated an action plan to further strengthen some of these areas as<br />

mentioned in Annex 7.<br />

145. MRVC’s accounting staff (mostly on deputation from the Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s) is<br />

experienced and familiar with the <strong>Bank</strong>’s requirements.<br />

146. There is a 3-tier system of audit in MRVC comprising of: (i) concurrent internal<br />

audit by management appointed firm of Chartered Accountants under a Terms of Reference; (ii)<br />

annual statutory audit of the entity by independent firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by<br />

50


the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India; and (iii) audit by CAG through the<br />

Principal Director of Commercial Audit.<br />

Action Plan<br />

147. Taking the above into consideration, a GAAP has been prepared that comprises of<br />

(i) project level actions that support transparent systems and processes for procurement, financial<br />

management and reporting and better quality assurance through enhanced demand-side<br />

mechanisms within the project, and (ii) organization level reforms to create an enabling<br />

environment for better enforcement and prevention of corruption. These actions are in the<br />

following areas:<br />

(a) Actions to enhance policies<br />

(b) Actions to enhance procedures<br />

(c) Actions to enhance institutions<br />

(d) Actions to strengthen capacity and human resources<br />

The complete action plan matrix is given in Table 1. Key components of the action plan are<br />

described in the following sections.<br />

Actions for Enhancing Information Disclosure<br />

148. India passed the Right to Information Act, in 2005 and the Act became operational<br />

across India from 12 October 2005. The Act mandates the disclosure of and universal access to<br />

information wherever in the public interest. Compliance to the Act is required for all public<br />

entities including MRVC.<br />

149. Implementation of RTI requires systems for on demand and suo moto disclosure of<br />

information, and for each government department to develop a disclosure policy, automated<br />

systems for record and document management, and information handling, and appointment of<br />

trained staff, programs for citizen awareness, and annual progress reporting. As mandated by the<br />

Act, MRVC has appointed on part-time basis a Public Information Officer (PIO), Assistant<br />

Public Information Officer and the Appellate Authority and has uploaded comprehensive<br />

information about MRVC’s functioning, project related information, agency’s annual report,<br />

sources of funds, directory, roles and responsibilities of MRVC officials, etc. on MRVC’s<br />

website (www.mrvc.indianrail.gov.in).<br />

150. To comply with the RTIA provisions for both on-demand and suo moto disclosure<br />

of project related information, MRVC has also formulated a comprehensive project disclosure<br />

policy (as given in Chapter 9 of the implementation manual).<br />

Actions for Enhancing Complaint Handling<br />

151. MRVC will establish a system to register and monitor status of follow up of all<br />

received comments, suggestions and grievances and enable the same on its web site<br />

(www.mrvc.indianrail.gov.in), which will be updated monthly. MRVC will record and/or refer<br />

as appropriate all incoming grievances or complaints pertaining to the MUTP-2A project.<br />

51


152. MRVC will also establish procedures to deal with external complaints on<br />

procurement, fraud/corruption and construction quality (as described in Chapter 9 of<br />

Implementation Manual). MRVC will respond to all complaints, pertaining to MUTP-2A within<br />

15 days of receipt, with copy to Managing Director, MRVC. Tracking of the status of<br />

complaints, related investigations and measures taken will be reported in monthly reports to<br />

management. Complaints deemed possible serious infringements may be further investigated by<br />

the Vigilance unit of MRVC and the Chief Vigilance Commission. These cases will also be<br />

included in quarterly reports to the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />

153. Contact information (dedicated email address, phone numbers) of the complaint<br />

handling and vigilance officials shall be widely publicized. Web-based campaigns, newspaper<br />

advertisements and displays on hoardings at highly visible locations will also be made to<br />

encourage public to report any misconduct, misappropriation and grievances to MRVC.<br />

Actions to deter Fraud and Corruption<br />

154. MRVC will formulate a transparent policy describing incentives for<br />

whistleblowers, sanctions for staff found indulging in fraudulent behavior and after due<br />

approvals, disclose these to the public. If as a result of any such information provided by the<br />

member of the public, cost savings are achieved or charges of misconduct and misappropriation<br />

are proven, such members of the public will be awarded some recognition such as a certificate of<br />

excellence or felicitation at a public ceremony with or without a monetary reward.<br />

Simultaneously, strict disincentives will be announced for the erring members of the departments<br />

and remedial actions established in cases of fraud and corruption. This will include sanctions to<br />

government staff proven to be involved in such cases.<br />

155. Any entity that is found to have misused funds, or not effectively carried out key<br />

elements of the anti-corruption plan, may be excluded from participation in subsequent works of<br />

MRVC. Information regarding such cases, where lessons are learned and funds are retrieved, will<br />

be widely published for information of the members of public. Strict procedures to ensure<br />

anonymity of informants will be enforced.<br />

Actions to Enhance Quality and Project Monitoring<br />

156. In addition to design reviews by MRVC/RDSO, MRVC will engage independent<br />

third parties/quality assurance consultants such as Indian Institute of Technology, National<br />

Institute of Design under agreed Terms of Reference for evaluations of technical designs and<br />

advice on technical issues wherever necessary as per the contractual provisions. These entities<br />

would also verify achievement of project milestones, enabling better controls over contractor<br />

payments. MRVC will also commission impact assessment studies and user satisfaction surveys<br />

annually to obtain stakeholder feedback.<br />

157. To strengthen project monitoring, MRVC proposes to develop a MIS within a year<br />

of project start, and enable it online for quick review and decision-making. To facilitate the<br />

review, MRVC will formulate a score-card method for judging physical and financial progress of<br />

the project at any stage. Proposed annual project audits will also enable better monitoring.<br />

52


Actions to Strengthen Institutions and Capacity<br />

158. Following an assessment of the current corporate governance and financial<br />

management arrangements, MRVC has evolved an action plan for strengthening the same. The<br />

actionable areas include strengthening of internal audit, project monitoring and contract<br />

management arrangements. In addition, the proposed project will also be subject to annual<br />

project audit under <strong>Bank</strong> agreed TOR and the complete report would be published on MRVC’s<br />

website.<br />

159. MRVC will also start building a database with procurement and contractor<br />

performance data from the project such as number of bids received, bid prices, unit prices,<br />

specifications, time and cost overruns. This will enable statistical analysis to preclude collusion<br />

and facilitate reference checks on future bids. MRVC will also disclose on its website the process<br />

for disqualification of bidders found to engage in fraudulent/corrupt practices.<br />

160. MRVC will undertake a comprehensive training needs assessment for its entire<br />

staff, and finalize a training plan. This, along with the TA studies undertaken 32 should facilitate<br />

strengthening of capacity. In addition, MRVC proposes to include training on the RTIA for all its<br />

officers and staff to sensitize them on the need for transparency of information.<br />

Monitoring Indicators<br />

161. The <strong>Bank</strong> will monitor implementation of these elements wherever necessary as<br />

per the contractual provisions 37 , through inter alia:<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

(d)<br />

(e)<br />

Disclosure of information will be supervised mainly through: (a) checking the<br />

frequency and comprehensiveness of website updates, and (b) checking the<br />

comprehensiveness of information available on citizen information boards at site(s),<br />

newsletters etc.<br />

Quality monitoring will be supervised through the harnessing of third parties in<br />

review of project design and monitoring, periodicity of reports of the impact<br />

assessment and user satisfaction surveys.<br />

The complaints handling system and the system of sanctions and remedies will be<br />

supervised mainly through: (a) periodic review of statistics based on records kept<br />

on the website of MRVC; (b) field level checks to ensure that problems are being<br />

reported and acted upon; (c) review of quarterly reports on complaint handling<br />

submitted to the <strong>Bank</strong><br />

Institutional improvements will be monitored through the progress in<br />

implementation of the CGFA action plan, online complaints handling system,<br />

procurement and project management database and operability of the project MIS.<br />

Capacity enhancements will be monitored through percentage of staff and officers<br />

sent for training including on RTIA, number and type of preventive vigilance<br />

initiatives.<br />

32 See Annex 4<br />

53


Indicative Costs<br />

162. The cost of the GAAP implementation is part of the technical assistance<br />

component of the project and project implementation costs (financed by MRVC) comprising of:<br />

(a) cost to develop MIS; (b) costs to develop online complaint handling mechanism; (c) costs to<br />

commission third-party monitors/quality assurance consultants; (d) costs to commission the<br />

annual impact assessment and user satisfaction surveys; (e) cost of training staff.<br />

163. It has been agreed that MRVC and the <strong>Bank</strong> will review the implementation of the<br />

GAAP during the supervision missions and a comprehensive review at mid-term. This will<br />

enable an evaluation of the GAAP’s effectiveness and opportunity for mid-course corrections.<br />

54


Table 1: Governance and Accountability Action Plan<br />

1. Policy Actions to Enhance Transparency<br />

Risk Area<br />

Action(s) to be taken to mitigate risk<br />

Project-level<br />

Formulate a proactive public disclosure policy and<br />

disclose all project information to the public through<br />

Discretion in<br />

decision making,<br />

lack of<br />

transparency and the MRVC web-site.<br />

accountability<br />

and political to highlight issues.<br />

interference that<br />

may adversely<br />

affect project<br />

outcomes.<br />

2. Measures to Enhance Procedures<br />

Corruption/<br />

collusion in<br />

procurement;<br />

weak financial<br />

management and<br />

complaint<br />

handling<br />

procedures;<br />

weak<br />

coordination<br />

with other<br />

executing<br />

agencies<br />

Engagement with media during supervision missions<br />

Entity-level<br />

Formulate a transparent policy describing sanctions for<br />

staff found indulging in fraudulent behavior and<br />

incentives for whistleblowers.<br />

Project-level<br />

Standardize eligibility criteria for bidders and product<br />

quality needs to preclude confusion. Consult bidders<br />

through pre-bid meetings on the same as needed;<br />

discourage repeated cancellation of bid invitations.<br />

Incorporate feedback received from participatory<br />

monitoring exercises on financial matters in periodic<br />

financial reviews.<br />

Sign Memoranda of Understanding with all the other<br />

executing agencies for better coordination.<br />

Entity-level<br />

Appoint a complaint handling officer and establish<br />

procedures to deal with complaints on procurement,<br />

Maintain an updated database on complaints received<br />

and action taken for suo moto or on-demand public<br />

disclosure<br />

Strengthen systems and procedures to implement RTI –<br />

through Website, Newsletter, Citizen Information Boards<br />

etc.<br />

Improve financial management systems to facilitate<br />

management decisions, periodic monitoring of budgets<br />

and timely reporting.<br />

Notify details of the process for disqualification of<br />

bidders who engage in misrepresentation/ fraudulent/<br />

corrupt practices on MRVC website (<strong>Railway</strong> Board<br />

policy of disqualifying bidders who engage in such<br />

practices for supplying to <strong>Railway</strong> Stores will be adapted<br />

for this)<br />

3. Measures to Strengthen Institutions<br />

Weak complaint<br />

and grievance<br />

handling<br />

mechanisms,<br />

weak corporate<br />

governance,<br />

weak quality<br />

control and<br />

monitoring<br />

Project-level<br />

Introduce Integrity Pacts for increased Transparency and<br />

Integrity on all contracts in MUTP-2A<br />

Introduce annual project audit and need-based internal<br />

audit and take prompt action to resolve all audit<br />

observations.<br />

Develop a project MIS for effective project monitoring<br />

and review and link it to the web for quick review and<br />

Timeline/Stat<br />

us<br />

Policy<br />

formulated and<br />

agreed upon.<br />

As needed.<br />

July 2010<br />

Continuous<br />

Quarterly<br />

June 2010<br />

July 2010<br />

March 2010<br />

Already in<br />

place; will be<br />

further<br />

strengthened<br />

August 2010<br />

July 2010<br />

As and when<br />

mutually<br />

agreed<br />

Annual<br />

To be<br />

developed<br />

Implementing<br />

Officials<br />

PIO, AA,<br />

HODs<br />

<strong>Bank</strong>, MRVC<br />

BOD,<br />

Vigilance<br />

Officials<br />

HODs<br />

Finance<br />

Officials<br />

BOD<br />

BOD,<br />

Vigilance<br />

PIO, AA, CO<br />

and HODs<br />

PIO, AA,<br />

HODs<br />

MRVC FM<br />

Vigilance<br />

officials<br />

BOD/Vigilan<br />

ce Officials<br />

Finance<br />

officials,<br />

BOD<br />

HODs<br />

55


follow up action.<br />

during the 1 st<br />

year of project<br />

execution<br />

Commission impact assessment studies and user<br />

satisfaction surveys to obtain user feedback<br />

Empanel reputed third-parties for technical<br />

design/studies and/or evaluations.<br />

Entity-level<br />

Implement corporate governance and financial<br />

accountability action plan.<br />

Develop a comprehensive comments, suggestions and<br />

grievances handling system and enable the same on the<br />

MRVC Website<br />

Commission an online system for registering, tracking<br />

and monitoring of complaints.<br />

Start compiling database on number of bids, bid prices,<br />

unit prices, specifications, contractor performance for<br />

future reference.<br />

4. Measures to Enhance Human Resources (all at entity-level)<br />

Weak<br />

implementation<br />

arrangements TA.<br />

that may<br />

adversely affect<br />

MRVC staff<br />

project processes<br />

and results<br />

Key: AA = Assistant Accounts Officer<br />

Identify training needs and finalize training plan for all<br />

staff. Conduct appropriate training for staff from <strong>Bank</strong><br />

Conduct campaigns to spread awareness of anticorruption<br />

measures and vigilance mechanisms among<br />

Annual<br />

As needed.<br />

Plan agreed<br />

upon.<br />

Already in<br />

place<br />

July 2010<br />

July 2010<br />

Continuous<br />

Periodically.<br />

BOD/HODs<br />

HODs<br />

Finance<br />

officials,<br />

BOD<br />

Vigilance<br />

Officials and<br />

Complaint<br />

Handling<br />

Officers<br />

Vigilance<br />

Officials and<br />

Complaint<br />

Handling<br />

Officers<br />

Procurement<br />

officials,<br />

HODs<br />

HODs/HRD<br />

Vigilance<br />

Officials<br />

Conduct training on RTI for all MRVC officers and staff Continuous HRD and<br />

PIO, AA<br />

BOD = Board of Directors<br />

CO = Complaints Officer<br />

HOD = Head of Department<br />

HRD = Human Resources Department<br />

PIO = Public Information Officer<br />

56


Annex 6 B: Supervision Strategy Matrix<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

164. The Supervision Strategy is to ensure that the objective of MUTP-2A project are<br />

achieved satisfactorily and timely manner and the implementation of all project activities follow<br />

agreed procedures and complies with all fiduciary and safeguard requirements. Supervision<br />

Strategy for the proposed MUTP-2A is developed based on the lessons learnt from the ongoing<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project, other projects in India Portfolio and India Health Sector DIR,<br />

which indentified, among other things, weaknesses in <strong>Bank</strong>’s supervision strategy and lack of<br />

field and independent verification of project activities early on. Also, the supervision strategy<br />

links the key project risks identified in the Risk Identification Worksheet with the mitigation<br />

measures laid out in the Governance and Accountability Action Plan.<br />

165. Supervision Methodology: The project supervision will be based on (i) physical<br />

verification of the works by the <strong>Bank</strong> task team and <strong>Bank</strong> hired consultants; (ii) Sample cross<br />

checking and verification of the progress reports provided by the client, (iii) Close scrutiny of<br />

audit reports and financial management reports (iv) Carrying out interim missions, in addition to<br />

full implementation support missions on key issues, (v) discussions and regular meetings with<br />

the implementing agency and other stake holders, (vi) Close follow up with the implementing<br />

agency on the key issues highlighted during the implementation support missions and (vii) active<br />

involvement of the <strong>Bank</strong> management and the Department of Economic Affairs to resolve key<br />

issues specially those related with fraud and corruption.<br />

166. Team Composition: The <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> supervision core team will comprise<br />

specialists having high level of skills covering urban transport, railway engineering, social and<br />

environment impact management, procurement, financial management and audit, institutional/<br />

governance, and monitoring and evaluation.<br />

167. Most of the <strong>Bank</strong> task team will be based in Delhi <strong>Bank</strong> office, which will allow<br />

prompt visits by individual team members to the field as and when required. In addition, the<br />

<strong>Bank</strong> will hire from time to time international experts to check the quality of the work and<br />

provide the expert support for overall project implementation.<br />

168. Frequency of the visits: The <strong>Bank</strong> team will visit project site twice a year. In<br />

addition, interim missions will be carried out on key issues. The supervision task team will<br />

develop, together with the client, a check list to review the implementation of the project<br />

including safeguard and fiduciary actions. This will ensure an objective way of monitoring the<br />

project.<br />

169. Supervision Budget: A supervision budget of US$200,000 per year is estimated<br />

to cover the cost of <strong>Bank</strong> staff, consultants and travel expenses.<br />

170. Supervision strategy and expected outcome: The main supervision activities to<br />

be covered by the <strong>Bank</strong> and the client are provided in the table below which also highlights the<br />

expected outcomes.<br />

57


Table1. Supervision Strategy Matrix<br />

Client’s role 33 <strong>Bank</strong>’s role Expected outcomes<br />

Review of the designs to be carried out by<br />

MRVC/ RDSO and supervision of the<br />

works to be carried out by MRVC and other<br />

executing agencies.<br />

MRVC clearance process to be followed for<br />

all works, goods and TA contracts for the<br />

value upto INR 1000 million (US20<br />

million) and for those above this value,<br />

evaluation report to be forwarded to Indian<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> Board for review of the<br />

recommendations<br />

To use <strong>Bank</strong>’s Standard Bid <strong>Document</strong>s or<br />

updated model documents as applicable<br />

MRVC staff to attend training courses on<br />

procurement, contract administration and<br />

project management.<br />

All the actions listed in Annex 7<br />

TECHNICAL and Quality ASPECTS<br />

Implementation support mission and<br />

interim missions<br />

Review of the progress reports<br />

Discussion and regular meetings with the<br />

implementing agency and other stake<br />

holders.<br />

PROCUREMENT<br />

Most of the contracts will be prior<br />

reviewed.<br />

Review of the contracts not subject to prior<br />

review by the <strong>Bank</strong> will be carried out<br />

either by the <strong>Bank</strong> team or <strong>Bank</strong> hired<br />

consultant, who will review agreed samples<br />

of such contracts. Observations from such<br />

reviews shall be shared with the Borrower<br />

and lessons learnt will be implemented for<br />

future procurement.<br />

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT<br />

Focus on the adequacy of the financial<br />

reporting, including timeliness and<br />

completeness of the financial reports.<br />

Desk review of the audit reports and follow<br />

up on action taken<br />

Participating in site visits to review<br />

MRVC’s internal control procedures and<br />

practices.<br />

Compliance of the<br />

contract conditions,<br />

engineering design<br />

and technical<br />

specifications<br />

Reduced possibility of<br />

cost and time over run<br />

Reduced possibility of<br />

contract variations.<br />

<strong>Bank</strong> / MRVC<br />

procurement<br />

guidelines followed<br />

Open, transparent and<br />

competitive<br />

procurement achieved.<br />

Compliance with all<br />

financial management<br />

requirements;<br />

Audit comments taken<br />

into considerations;<br />

Financial progress<br />

closely following<br />

physical progress.<br />

Coordinate and monitor safeguard measures<br />

to mitigate impacts; and periodically report<br />

about progress.<br />

SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARDS<br />

Monitor safeguard and value added<br />

measures implemented by MRVC and<br />

provide technical advice as necessary and<br />

appropriate through discussion and sharing<br />

of emerging issues.<br />

Compliance with<br />

safeguard policies and<br />

achieving social and<br />

environmental value<br />

added outcomes.<br />

33 Includes NGO and consultants hired by the client<br />

58


Annex 7: Financial Management and Disbursement Arrangements<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

Summary of Financial Management (FM) Assessment<br />

171. The <strong>Bank</strong> funded MUTP-1 34 under which MRVC is responsible for<br />

implementation of the rail component is continuing. MRVC is the sole implementing agency for<br />

MUTP-2A and will be responsible for FM arrangements for the project. This FM assessment<br />

concludes that MRVC has a financial management system which is considered adequate, to<br />

account for and report on the project resources and expenditures accurately. However there is<br />

scope for further improvements in these FM arrangements and in this respect an action plan has<br />

been discussed and agreed with MRVC.<br />

Background<br />

172. MRVC was incorporated on July 12 1999 as a government company under the<br />

Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s (MOR) to implement the rail component of an integrated rail cum road<br />

urban transport project called <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project (MUTP). Its vision/ mission is to<br />

develop world class infrastructure for an efficient, safe and sustainable railway system in<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban section to provide comfortable and friendly train services to the commuters 35 .<br />

MRVC is also involved in the further planning and development of <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban Rail<br />

System for improved rail services in close coordination with Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s and Government of<br />

Maharashtra. As per Article 177 of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of MRVC the<br />

period of validity of MRVC is minimum five years and maximum 15 years. MRVC has applied<br />

to both MOR and GOM for extension of validity period. The approval is expected shortly.<br />

173. MRVC’s has a share capital of Rs.25 crores held in the ratio of 51:49 by Indian<br />

<strong>Railway</strong>s and Government of Maharashtra. Its existing manpower is approximately 180. It<br />

exercises autonomy and delegation of financial powers as applicable to Schedule-A public sector<br />

companies. MRVC’s sources of revenue comprise Direction and General Charges recovered<br />

from projects executed by MRVC, Central and Western <strong>Railway</strong>, MMRDA and other executing<br />

agencies under MUTP-1 and interest on term deposit.<br />

174. Operating results of MRVC:<br />

Rs. Crores<br />

Particulars 2008-09 2007-08 2006-07<br />

Total income 36.38 32.95 17.04<br />

Total expenditure 16.65 10.44 7.04<br />

Surplus 19.73 22.51 10.00<br />

Accumulated surplus 81.48 63.84 41.23<br />

175. MUTP-2A requires a total financing of US$970.5 million (Project costs of Rs.4290<br />

crores). The share of IBRD is estimated at US$430 million and the balance US$540.5 million is<br />

34 The overall coordinating implementing agency under MUTP-1 is <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Regional Development<br />

Authority (MMRDA), responsible for the road component of the project including R&R. Municipal <strong>Corporation</strong> of<br />

the Greater <strong>Mumbai</strong>, Bombay Electricity and Bus Services ; Maharashtra State Road Development <strong>Corporation</strong><br />

,MRVC and Traffic Police are other executing agencies under MUTP-1.<br />

35 Source Corporate Plan 2006-2016.<br />

59


counterpart funded. The assets created under the project will be owned by CR/ WR as<br />

appropriate.<br />

Financial Management Strengths, Weaknesses and Mitigating Arrangements<br />

176. The project draws the following strengths in the area of financial management: a<br />

budgeting, accounting and reporting system has been operational in the entity for the past several<br />

years, which will be used for accounting and generating the required financial reports under the<br />

project. MRVC is implementing satisfactorily the rail component of MUTP-1 funded by the<br />

<strong>Bank</strong> and has experience of the <strong>Bank</strong>’s FM policies and procedures including those relating to<br />

special commitments. A detailed project implementation manual has been prepared.<br />

177. The <strong>Bank</strong> team conducted a review of financial management, corporate<br />

governance and accountability arrangements of MRVC 36 which has indicated that MRVC has<br />

institutionalized certain cardinal principles in areas like accounting, auditing, internal control,<br />

budgeting and reporting which have laid the foundation for a basic financial accountability and<br />

corporate governance framework in the organization. However there is scope to further improve<br />

financial accountability and corporate governance arrangements of the organization to further<br />

strengthen the capacity to more effectively manage the proposed project. Actions have been<br />

initiated to strengthen internal audit and for updating finance manuals. Others are proposed in<br />

detail in the action plan (refer to Table 3, page 71). The overall FM risk is rated at Moderate.<br />

Type of Risk<br />

Inherent<br />

Risks<br />

Country level<br />

(India)<br />

Entity level (at<br />

MRVC level)<br />

Risk<br />

Assessment<br />

Risk Mitigating Measures<br />

Residual Risk<br />

M India country level rating. GoI is the borrower. M<br />

H<br />

Action plan for improvement of corporate governance<br />

and financial accountability arrangements agreed during<br />

preparation.<br />

Project level H Internal controls built into the project design with<br />

enhanced internal audit and improved contract<br />

management. Project FM manual as part of overall<br />

Implementation Manual is being finalized<br />

Overall inherent Risk<br />

Control Risks<br />

Budgeting S Budgeting framework exists; Monitoring framework will<br />

be improved; Annual work plans and cash forecasting<br />

will be enhanced.<br />

Accounting M Separate trial balances of MUTP-2A will be prepared;<br />

Accounting and reporting formats will be put in place;<br />

Internal H<br />

Controls<br />

Internal audit system will be strengthened; Audit<br />

committee will be strengthened with independent<br />

directors and made more effective; Internal controls for<br />

contract management will be enhanced.<br />

Funds flow M Funds flow to MRVC through the budget route from<br />

MOR and GOM. Counterpart funding will be available.<br />

Similar fund flow mechanism under MUTP-1 found<br />

effective.<br />

S<br />

S<br />

S<br />

M<br />

L<br />

S<br />

L<br />

36<br />

A report on “Corporate Governance and Financial Accountability Arrangements” prepared by the <strong>Bank</strong> is<br />

available in the project files. The report contains a detailed assessment and identifies areas for improvements along<br />

with an action plan.<br />

60


Financial<br />

Reporting<br />

S<br />

Formats agreed for project reporting; Internal financial<br />

reporting for entity will be enhanced.<br />

Auditing S Independent project auditor with agreed terms of<br />

reference.<br />

Overall control Risk<br />

RESIDUAL RISK RATING<br />

M<br />

M<br />

M<br />

Moderate<br />

178. The residual risk rating is moderate as a few major off-line supply contracts are<br />

proposed to be funded under the project. Direct payment by the <strong>Bank</strong> under special commitment<br />

will be availed in specific cases (which has been used under MUTP-1). There are five supply and<br />

installation, two goods and seven technical assistance contracts which are subject to prior review<br />

by the <strong>Bank</strong>. Independent third-party consultants will be appointed 37 to certify the quality and<br />

progress of work and acceptability of the equipment/ works on periodic basis. Equipment<br />

procured/ constructed under the project will be handed over to WR/ CR after commissioning and<br />

joint review by CR/WR and MRVC.<br />

179. Arrangements for Oversight and Accountability: MRVC will be responsible for<br />

the FM arrangements of the project. At the helm of affairs of MRVC is the Board of Directors<br />

(Board). As per the Memorandum and Articles of Association (MAA) of the Company the<br />

maximum number of directors is 11. The Chairman is part time. The Managing Director is<br />

supported by three full-time directors (Technical, Projects and Finance); two part-time directors<br />

(Resettlement and Rehabilitation and Infrastructure and Commercial Development); two parttime<br />

official directors and one part-time non-official director. There is scope for the appointment<br />

of one more part-time non-official director, since there is provision in the MAA for two part-time<br />

non-official directors (independent directors) 38 . The Board meets quarterly 39 . It is assisted by a<br />

full-time Company Secretary and Heads of Departments.<br />

180. There is a Board level audit committee set up in accordance with the requirements<br />

of section 292A of the Companies Act 1956 with three members – Director (Technical), and two<br />

part time official directors. Thus there are no independent directors in the present audit<br />

committee and the audit committee meetings are held twice annually against quarterly prescribed<br />

by department of public enterprises (DPE) guidelines 40 . MRVC will (i) induct the existing nonofficial<br />

Director in the audit committee and request GOM to nominate a non-official Director<br />

who would then be inducted in the audit committee (ii) designate one of the non-official<br />

directors to function as the Chairman of the audit committee and (iii) increase the frequency of<br />

the audit committee meeting to four times in a year in due course of time.<br />

37 MRVC appoints the following agencies/ individuals for inspection: RDSO (for prototypes); Resident <strong>Railway</strong><br />

Advisors (for imported products) and RITES (for locally manufactured products/ works). MRVC’s engineering team<br />

also carries out inspection of works.<br />

38 The provision for two part time non official Directors is less than the required number of four or one-third of the<br />

Board strength as prescribed by the Department of Public Enterprises (DPE) in the corporate governance code for<br />

central public sector undertakings (CPSUs). Implementing this provision would require restructuring the Board of<br />

MRVC. MRVC has requested the <strong>Railway</strong> Board to approach DPE for relaxation of the provision.<br />

39 There is monthly review of MRVC works by MD and coordination meeting at 45 days interval between MRVC,<br />

CR, WR and GOM to review progress of MUTP.<br />

40 DPE’s code on corporate governance for CPSUs prescribes that two-thirds of the audit committee members<br />

should be independent directors and that the chairman of the audit committee should be an independent director.<br />

Further, the charter of audit committee has been defined by MRVC which also defines the frequency of meetings (at<br />

least two meetings) and the scope of the audit committee (covers review of internal controls, financial statements<br />

and half-yearly reports, internal and statutory audit reports etc). The frequency of meeting of the audit committee is<br />

less compared to the DPE guidelines which prescribe at least four meetings annually.<br />

61


181. A detailed Project Implementation Manual will be in place which will provide the<br />

structure, systems and procedures, controls and reporting arrangements for overall project<br />

management of MUTP-2A including FM and contract management.<br />

182. Fund Flow: MUTP-2A will be financed through IBRD Loan and counterpart<br />

funds from IR and GOM. IR and GOM will share equally the cost of the project as well as the<br />

proceeds of the loan and its repayment. The counterpart funding will also be on a 50:50 cost<br />

sharing basis. To contribute to the repayment of the loan IR has levied a surcharge on suburban<br />

rail tickets in <strong>Mumbai</strong> area being collected by WR and CR. 50 percent of the surcharge collected<br />

will be made available to MOF representing MOR’s contribution to the consolidated fund of<br />

India towards servicing of the MOR’s share of the loan and the remaining 50 percent of the<br />

surcharge collected will be passed on to GOM through MRVC, or adjusted against funds<br />

receivable from GOM. The expenditures of the project from the proceeds of the loan as well as<br />

from counterpart funds are routed through MRVC (see Chart 1).<br />

Chart 1. Fund Flow Arrangements<br />

Legend<br />

Loan disbursement<br />

Loan repayment<br />

Grant by IR/GOM<br />

IBRD Loan<br />

Ministry of Finance/<br />

Govt. of India<br />

GOM<br />

955 cr. 955 cr.<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong><br />

IR<br />

1. Loan 1,910<br />

1,200 cr.<br />

Jointly taken by IR & GOM<br />

2. Counterpart Funding<br />

1,200 cr.<br />

Grant by IR 1,200<br />

GOM 1,200<br />

3. TOTAL (Rs. Crore) 4,311<br />

Rolling Stock<br />

Fleet Increase<br />

DC to AC<br />

Conversion<br />

Maintenance<br />

Facilities<br />

Stabling Lines<br />

Technical<br />

Assistance<br />

Levy of surcharge<br />

collected by CR & WR<br />

62


183. The project will be funded through budget releases to MRVC by MOR/ IR and<br />

GOM as in the case of MUTP-1. Separate budget codes will be established for the purpose by<br />

MRVC. The <strong>Bank</strong> loan will finance (i) procurement of electrical equipment for rolling stock, (ii)<br />

off line works including setting up of new traction sub-stations and switching posts, procurement<br />

of digital axle counters and catenary maintenance equipment and (iii) technical assistance for<br />

studies for sustainable expansion of rail services; programs for improving passenger convenience<br />

and information; plans for improving safety and environmental management of operations;<br />

capacity for increased operational efficiency; and training. The remaining supplies and works<br />

will be counterpart funded: manufacture of trains at Chennai ICF; new traction substations, EMU<br />

maintenance facilities and stabling lines and on-line works under AC/DC conversion. The<br />

detailed project cost and sharing between IBRD and counterpart are provided in Annex 4. The<br />

executing agencies – CR, WR, ICF and RDSO will prepare estimates for the expenditure on the<br />

relevant sub-projects in their annual budgets and inform MRVC. MRVC will prepare the<br />

consolidated annual project budget/ expenditure schedule taking into account the inputs from the<br />

executing agencies and notify both MOR and GOM for creating necessary budget provisions.<br />

184. Each year after passing of the <strong>Railway</strong> Budget, the <strong>Railway</strong> Board will issue a<br />

sanction order allotting funds to MUTP-2A and authorizing transfer of funds to MRVC for<br />

further re-allocation and transfer of funds to the executing agencies concerned. GoM’s annual<br />

budget will create a budget head for MUTP-2A under the Urban Development Department for<br />

receiving the Additional Central Assistance from GoI and passing it on to MRVC through<br />

MMRDA. MMRDA’s annual budget estimates will provide for receipt of ACA and counterpart<br />

funds from GoM, and its disbursement to MRVC. Funds for the project will be received by<br />

MRVC through quarterly releases by MOR/ IR and from GOM against periodic demands by<br />

MRVC. MRVC will maintain a common bank account and will book for the resources and<br />

expenditures by project and activity and report to the <strong>Bank</strong> through IUFR.<br />

185. Based on funds requirement of the various executing agencies, MRVC will<br />

provide advances and the executing agencies will submit expenditure statements on periodic<br />

basis. The MOU between the executing agencies and MRVC will regulate the periodic fund flow<br />

and reporting including submission of annual audit report on expenditure statements by the<br />

executing agencies.<br />

186. Disbursement Arrangements: The table below shows disbursement categories and<br />

loan financing percentages:<br />

Expenditure Category<br />

Amount<br />

(US$ million)<br />

Financing Percentage<br />

1. Goods, Supply and Installation 412.364<br />

Rolling Stock Procurement 355.696 100%<br />

DC to AC Conversion 55.155 100%<br />

Simulation software 1.513 100%<br />

2. Consultant Services and Training 12.894 100%<br />

Total 425.258<br />

Front end Fee 1.075<br />

Unallocated 3.667<br />

Total 430.000<br />

63


187. The IBRD funds will flow to MOR/ IR (as a budget grant) and GOM (through<br />

ACA) from MOF. IBRD will advance an amount equivalent to six months forecast expenditure<br />

which will be deposited in the Designated Account that will be opened by MOF. Subsequent<br />

disbursements by the <strong>Bank</strong> will be routed through the Designated Account. Disbursements by<br />

IBRD would be made on the basis of the quarterly IUFRs 41 submitted by MRVC. Disbursement<br />

options would include IUFR-based advances against forecasts, reimbursements, direct payment<br />

to suppliers including special commitments/ letters of credit. Supporting documentation,<br />

including completion reports, certifications, bills and other documentation will be retained by<br />

MRVC and made available to the <strong>Bank</strong> during project supervision. These would also be audited<br />

as a part of annual project financial statements audit and subject to routine internal audit.<br />

Retroactive financing of up to 20 percent of project cost will be available under the project for<br />

payments made within 12 months prior to the date of the legal agreement and to be eligible, the<br />

activities should be procured as per <strong>Bank</strong> guidelines on procurement.<br />

188. IBRD Project Accounting: The number of transactions under the IBRD financed<br />

project is expected to be few large and bulky transactions except the payments under TA<br />

component. All contractual payments for the project will be made after due verification of the<br />

bills in accordance with the procedures laid down in the accounting manual as updated by the<br />

company/ project implementation manual. The project would have a separate trial balance and<br />

financial statement which will help in distinguishing costs financed by the proposed <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong><br />

loan.<br />

189. Separate general and sub-ledger codes will also be established to capture MUTP-<br />

2A budget and expenditure category/ component/ contract wise for monitoring and reporting to<br />

facilitate monitoring of budgeted and actual expenditure of the project on periodic basis, analysis<br />

of variances and corrective actions. The project budget and variances will also be reflected in the<br />

quarterly interim un-audited financial report (IUFR) of the project and the balance in hand would<br />

be reconciled with the project bank statement.<br />

190. Supplier bills will be checked and authorized by competent authority and<br />

independent inspector as specified for the project. Project progress and milestone completion<br />

will be independently certified before payment. Project finance personnel will check bills and<br />

pass them for payment in accordance with the agreements/ work orders, pre-dispatch inspection<br />

reports (for supply contracts), inspection certificates, measurement books, and original bills etc.,<br />

as per contractual provisions. All original bills and related documents and records etc will be<br />

maintained by MRVC accounts and will be subject to both internal and statutory audit.<br />

191. Following laid down procedures, project monitoring will be carried out on a<br />

regular basis. Suitable project monitoring software will be used 42 as a monitoring tool by project<br />

in charge and quarterly progress reports in both physical and financial terms will be provided to<br />

the <strong>Bank</strong> through the IUFR.<br />

192. As long as the loan is open, IUFR in an agreed format will be required giving<br />

details of funds received (IBRD and counterpart) project expenditure incurred during the quarter,<br />

year-to-date and project-to-date indicating separately expenditure out of IBRD funds and<br />

counterpart funds and comparing them with budgets and variances; project trial balance;<br />

41 MRVC would have the flexibility of furnishing reports earlier (say on a monthly basis) to seek early<br />

replenishments wherein they could also provide forecasts for a shorter period than six months.<br />

42 MRVC currently uses MS Project software for project monitoring and is considering Prima Vera under its<br />

computerization plan.<br />

64


projected IBRD funds requirement in the next two quarters; summary of claims and<br />

disbursements under IBRD; progress of contracting and contract payments; physical and<br />

financial progress of the project. The financial information in IUFR will be based on MRVC’s<br />

financial systems and submitted to both project management and IBRD. The annual project<br />

financial statements, which would be similar to the format of the IUFR would be audited and<br />

submitted to the <strong>Bank</strong> and disclosed in the website. The procedures will be clearly laid down in<br />

the Project Implementation Manual.<br />

193. Assets Procured/ Constructed under the Project: <strong>Railway</strong> assets procured/ created<br />

under the MUTP-1 project by MRVC are the property of Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s and under their<br />

safeguard and control. The railway assets under construction appear in MRVC’s books as capital<br />

work in progress subject to joint inspection and these are handed over to CR/ WR after<br />

commissioning 43 .<br />

194. Project Contract Management: Each contract will be assigned a project manager<br />

(PM) who will be the authorized representative of the employer responsible for contract<br />

management. The project implementation manual provides guidelines on contract management<br />

and specifies responsibility of the PM 44 , contractor, submission of detailed work program,<br />

monitoring of status of clearances, monitoring of work execution and periodic review of work<br />

progress. MRVC is using MS Projects for contract monitoring.<br />

195. R&R Payments: There is no R&R envisaged under MUTP-2A. However in the<br />

event of the need for land acquisition, MRVC will take necessary steps in consultation with<br />

GOM and MMRDA will handle R&R under the existing arrangement prescribed for MUTP-1.<br />

Both land acquisition and R&R will be counterpart funded. In the event of any R&R related<br />

payments, the fund flow and accountability arrangements would be agreed and reviewed from<br />

FM perspective in advance.<br />

MRVC Financial Management Arrangements<br />

196. Staffing: The FM function is headed by a Director, Finance and supported by<br />

Financial Advisor and Chief Accounts Officer (FA&CAO). The latter is assisted by two Senior<br />

Accounts Officers (SAOs) one of whom is the Coordinator for the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> MUTP-1 project;<br />

a Chartered Accountant (appointed as a Retainer); eight Senior Section Officers (SSOs); an<br />

Accounts Assistant; and three Consultants (retired officials). The total staff strength of the<br />

Department is 13, all on deputation from Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s for periods ranging from three to five<br />

years. The present staff members have accounting background and experience. It is proposed to<br />

strengthen FM with an additional Deputy FA&CAO reporting to the FA&CAO and supported by<br />

43 MRVC’s own assets comprising furniture, office equipment etc and construction of leased flats are accounted for<br />

and depreciated in accordance with Companies Act requirements. Fixed assets registers are being maintained and<br />

physical verification of assets are carried out periodically.<br />

44 These include ensuring the execution of project as per the scope of the work, setting the standards to which the<br />

work shall be constructed and completed, authorizing payments, approving any variations or design changes within<br />

the overall scope of the work; maintain proper records for quality, inspection, rejection or acceptance of work, and<br />

make available such records as may be called for by the Employer. PM to also ensure that bank/ performance<br />

guarantees, insurance policies and powers of attorneys are submitted on time, that provisions relating to extension of<br />

contract, quality assurance, safety, environmental protection provisions, liquidated damages, etc. are adhered to, that<br />

extension of the completion period and provisions of liquidated damages are imposed as per the delegation of<br />

powers of MRVC and that disputes are handled as per contractual provisions.<br />

65


three Senior Accounts Officers. The Deputy FA&CAO will also act as the Coordinator for<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> projects. A staffing and training needs assessment based on current and future<br />

workload is being worked out by MRVC 45 . The present budget on training is INR 25 lakhs<br />

approx. which is expected to go up to INR 50 lakhs to include MRVC training. The TA<br />

component under the project provides for training of FM staff in financial management and<br />

project management. The details are being worked out.<br />

197. The major elements of financial management accountability framework are in<br />

place in MRVC. There is an accounting manual issued in January 2004 which provides broad<br />

guidelines on the FM arrangements in MRVC for MUTP-1. There is scope for updating and<br />

further detailing the budgeting, fund flow, project accounting and management, and internal<br />

audit sections in the manual. This has been agreed with MRVC and the revised manual will be in<br />

place by July 2010.<br />

198. Budgeting and Performance Review: MRVC prepares annual capital expenditure<br />

budget and annual administrative budget. Annual project works expenditure budget is based on<br />

annual project work-plans of MRVC and other executing agencies (eg CR, WR, ICF, and<br />

RDSO). The works expenditure budget is approved by the MD and forwarded to the <strong>Railway</strong><br />

Board. Review of budget against actual expenditure is carried out in August, December (revised<br />

estimate) and February (final modification) with information from all executing agencies. For<br />

variations from the budget, approvals are obtained in advance from the budget approving<br />

authority. Annual administrative budget of MRVC is approved by the Board. Quarterly<br />

administrative expenditure reports comparing actual expenditure against budget are presented to<br />

the Board. MRVC may consider elaborating on the existing budget preparation guidelines<br />

contained in the accounting manual with more detailed instructions regarding the preparation and<br />

monitoring of project budgets including formats of reports. Quarterly rolling cash forecasts may<br />

be considered to strengthen management of funds.<br />

199. Accounting and Internal Controls: Accounting is carried out in MRVC Head<br />

Office. There are no other accounting units. Accounting is based on accrual principles and in<br />

accordance with accounting standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.<br />

There is an accounting manual which was last updated in December 2003. The manual lays<br />

down bill passing and payment procedures. An off-the-shelf accounting software package (Tally<br />

9) is being used for day to day accounting and periodic financial reporting. Half-yearly accounts<br />

are prepared and presented to the audit committee and the Board for review.<br />

200. In the areas of accounting and internal controls the rudiments such as schedule of<br />

powers 46 , chart of accounts, accounting policies and standards, brief accounting and procurement<br />

guidelines have been laid down in the accounting manual which was last updated in December<br />

2003. There is a need to further update relevant sections of the manual. There is also scope for<br />

45 The Chief Personnel Officer (CPO) is responsible for human resource management in MRVC. He is assisted by a<br />

Deputy and two supervisors. MRVC follows DPE guidelines and <strong>Railway</strong>s manuals for human resource<br />

management. List of training programs have been identified including and the training institutes. Training needs<br />

assessment is carried out by the HoD/ Director concerned. The training program includes training on <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong><br />

procurement procedures conducted by ASCI and NIFM. Further, MRVC proposes to send officers for the <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />

mandatory training.<br />

46 According to the Delegation of Procurement Powers, (i) in respect of program of capital expenditure (works<br />

sanctioned by <strong>Railway</strong> Board) MRVC is delegated powers for incurring expenditure up to Rs.150 crores on any<br />

program of capital expenditure; and (ii) in respect of purchase and placement of contracts of a major nature<br />

involving a substantial capital outlay MRVC is delegated powers for incurring expenditure up to Rs.100 crores for<br />

purchase/placement of contract of a major nature involving a substantial capital outlay.<br />

66


more detailed guidelines pertaining to accounting and controls to strengthen the financial<br />

management framework - for instance there are no instructions/ guidelines regarding project<br />

accounting (receipt of funds, disbursement and utilization thereof and reporting 47 ) in the manual<br />

which is the primary activity of MRVC.<br />

201. Management Reporting: There is formal reporting of half-yearly financial<br />

statements of MRVC to the audit committee and the Board 48 . Capital budget reviews are carried<br />

out in August, December and February. Administrative budget performance report and progress<br />

on sanctioned ongoing works of MUTP-1 are submitted to the Board on quarterly basis<br />

indicating both financial and physical progress of projects. There is monthly review of MRVC<br />

works by MD and a bi-monthly coordination meeting between MRVC, CR, WR, GOM and other<br />

executing agencies to review progress of MUTP-1. In addition MRVC submits monthly report<br />

on activities to the <strong>Railway</strong> Board.<br />

202. There is scope for MRVC to further elaborate on management reporting in the<br />

accounting manual with formats of reports and instructions for their preparation. MRVC may<br />

consider introducing quarterly reporting of financial results to the Board to match the frequency<br />

of progress reviews. MRVC plans to introduce quarterly reporting once the reporting from the<br />

executing agencies on a quarterly basis in an acceptable format is formally established. MRVC<br />

may also consider carrying out a formal assessment of reporting requirements to ensure that<br />

financial and operational reports that are needed are generated and in the form that facilitates<br />

decision-making. The assessment of organization wide reporting requirements could cover<br />

reports required by (i) top, middle and operating levels of management (ii) statutory and<br />

regulatory authorities (iii) lending agencies etc. and could be combined with the proposed<br />

computerization of MIS.<br />

203. Computerization: MRVC maintains its accounts in Tally 9, which is an off the<br />

shelf accounting software. A separate payroll package has been installed. There is a financial<br />

management system (FMS) which is used for preparing the quarterly progress report (QPR) on<br />

MUTP-1 for submission to the <strong>Bank</strong>. The FMS is an excel-spreadsheet where the non financial<br />

data is manually input and the financial data is downloaded into the spreadsheet. MRVC<br />

management may consider upgrading its computerized systems with appropriate project<br />

management and reporting software which could be integrated with the existing financial<br />

accounting system to generate management reports. MRVC has outsourced the assessment of<br />

computerization needs to be followed by a roadmap for implementation 49 .<br />

Entity Corporate Governance<br />

204. The DPE, Government of India has issued a code of corporate governance for<br />

CPSUs irrespective of whether or not they are listed in the stock exchange 50 . Although MRVC<br />

has implemented corporate governance practices in compliance with relevant provisions of the<br />

Companies Act 1956 it is yet to fully comply with the practices mandated by the DPE guidelines.<br />

47 MRVC’s lack of familiarity with <strong>Bank</strong> procedures for special commitments under MUTP-1 and GOI requirements<br />

in this respect has resulted in payment of/ demand for significant amount of penal interest (INR 5 crores approx.) to<br />

MoF. Detailed guidelines are being incorporated in both the project implementation manual and the finance manuals<br />

to avoid any recurrences.<br />

48 This is reportedly delayed due to delays in receiving expenditure statements from the other executing agencies of<br />

MUTP.<br />

49 L&T Infotech has been appointed to prepare the assessment and road map.<br />

50 The aim is to institutionalize good corporate governance practices that are broadly in conformity with SEBI<br />

guidelines.<br />

67


In the following table, the key components of the model code of corporate governance<br />

(applicable to a CPSU) and the present status in MRVC is presented.<br />

Table 1: Status of Draft Model Code on Corporate Governance in MRVC<br />

DPE code<br />

Board of directors shall have an optimum combination<br />

of functional, nominee and independent directors. The<br />

number of functional directors (including CMD/MD)<br />

should not exceed 50 percent of the actual strength of<br />

the board.<br />

The number of nominee directors shall be restricted to<br />

a maximum of two.<br />

In case of CPSEs listed in stock exchanges, the number<br />

of independent directors shall be at least 50 percent of<br />

board members. In case of CPSEs not listed in the<br />

stock exchanges at least one third of the board<br />

members should be independent directors (part-time<br />

directors) 51 .<br />

Qualified and independent audit committee 52 shall be<br />

set up giving the terms of reference with minimum<br />

three directors as members; Two thirds of the members<br />

of audit committee shall be independent directors; The<br />

chairman of the audit committee shall be an<br />

independent director.<br />

Audit committees should meet at least four times in a<br />

year and not more than four months shall elapse<br />

between two meetings.<br />

Risk management strategies and their oversight shall be<br />

one of the main responsibilities of the board and<br />

management 53 . Disclosure on risks and concerns should<br />

from part of Director’s report.<br />

Present MRVC status<br />

The current strength of the Board is ten as follows:<br />

Chairman<br />

MD<br />

Three full time directors<br />

Four part time official directors<br />

One part time non official director<br />

The number of functional directors including Chairman<br />

and MD is 50 percent of the current Board strength. The<br />

number of government nominee (part time official<br />

directors) exceeds the restricted level. The number of<br />

independent directors (part time non official directors)<br />

falls short of the required one-third of the Board members<br />

by two.<br />

There is an audit committee set up under the provisions of<br />

the Companies Act 1956. The audit committee has three<br />

members. There are no independent directors in the audit<br />

committee. The chairman of the audit committee is not an<br />

independent director.<br />

All members of the audit committee possess technical<br />

knowledge and expertise but no knowledge of financial<br />

matters.<br />

Audit committee mandate is to meet twice a year<br />

There is no formal risk management system in place. The<br />

management considers monitoring and achieving MOU<br />

target as part of enterprise risk management.<br />

The guidelines provide a list of minimum information<br />

that is required to be placed before the board 54 and<br />

included in the report on corporate governance in the<br />

annual report of the company 55 .<br />

Half-yearly results of MRVC are placed before the Board.<br />

There is no report on corporate governance in the annual<br />

report of MRVC and no certificate of compliance with<br />

corporate governance norms.<br />

51 Nominee directors appointed by an institution which has invested in or lent to the company shall be deemed to be<br />

independent directors<br />

52 All members of audit committee shall have knowledge of financial matters of company and at least one member<br />

shall have good knowledge of accounting and related financial management expertise. Detailed and elaborate role<br />

has been prescribed for audit committees including, financial performance, reporting and disclosures; internal<br />

control mechanisms (including internal audit); compliance with audit observations (internal as well as statutory);<br />

whistle blower mechanism etc<br />

53 On risk management the board shall ensure the integration and alignment of the risk management system with the<br />

corporate and operational objectives and also that risk management is undertaken as a part of normal business<br />

practice and not as a separate task at set times. The company shall lay down procedures to inform board members<br />

about the risk assessment and minimization procedures. These procedures shall be periodically reviewed to ensure<br />

that executive management controls risks through means of a properly defined framework. Procedure shall be laid<br />

down for internal risk management also.<br />

54 The list includes quarterly results for the company and its operating divisions or business segments (Annex IV).<br />

55 Annex VII to the guidelines provides a list of items to be included in the report on corporate governance in the<br />

annual report of companies. The company is also required to obtain a certificate from either the auditors or<br />

practicing company secretary regarding compliance of conditions of corporate governance as stipulated in the<br />

guidelines.<br />

68


Actions for Improving Corporate Governance<br />

205. During discussions with MRVC it was felt that the validity clause (life of 15 years<br />

for the entity) has come in the way of a long term vision and plans for the organization. The<br />

organization will complete 15 years in 2014. However there is strong likelihood of the validity<br />

period being extended/ removed. Nevertheless as long as MRVC functions as a CPSU, corporate<br />

governance norms prescribed by DPE for CPSUs would be applicable and therefore MRVC may<br />

consider taking appropriate steps to comply with these requirements.<br />

206. Independent directors: MRVC may engage MOR and DPE in restructuring the<br />

Board composition to accommodate the required number of independent directors with at least<br />

one finance professional among them 56 . In the interim, the remaining non-official director may<br />

be appointed to the Board by GOM.<br />

207. Audit committee: In the short term, induct the present independent director (nonofficial<br />

director) in the audit committee and enlarge audit committee charter and frequency of<br />

meetings as prescribed by the guidelines. On the appointment of the second non-official director<br />

s/he may be inducted in the audit committee. Otherwise MRVC may consider appointment of<br />

eminent person/s in an organizational committee to inject an element of independence and<br />

external and impartial debate in the proceedings/ decision making.<br />

208. Risk management: In the area of risk management, the corporate governance<br />

framework requires MRVC to develop suitable strategies for risk identification, assessment and<br />

mitigation. Risk factors that could have adverse bearing on MRVC’s functions, performance and<br />

reputation should be identified and managed. MRVC does have a brief corporate plan laying<br />

down vision/ mission and objectives, and the frame work of MUTP-1, 2 and beyond, however,<br />

there are no long term operational and risk management strategies and no plan projections for the<br />

MUTP life cycle. MRVC operates more on a ‘project to project mode’ with short term/ ad hoc<br />

plans (e.g., implementation of MUTP-1, followed by 2A) rather than as a business concern with<br />

long term plans and organization (e.g., the entire MUTP project). This is largely due to the<br />

limited validity period prescribed which is now proposed to be dropped 57 . Since the entity’s life<br />

is being proposed to be extended, the need for risk management needs to be viewed in the longer<br />

term perspective for MRVC based on its future role and suitable risk identification, mitigation<br />

and monitoring strategies need to be put in place. Major risks for MRVC as project<br />

implementation agency are time and cost over-run, quality of equipment and works, several<br />

executing agencies not under the control of MRVC; important income source for GOM/MOR is<br />

levy of surcharge collected by CR and WR – changes in this may affect financing capacity;<br />

resettlement of project affected families may delay project implementation etc. In the area of<br />

governance, absence of independent and objective viewpoint in decision making, inadequate<br />

capacity/ vacancies/ continuity of staff as MRVC is staffed by personnel on deputation etc are<br />

risks. For enterprise risks suitable mitigation measures need to be developed, monitored and<br />

reported. MRVC needs to chalk out a plan for risk assessment and mitigation externally aided if<br />

necessary and weave in risk monitoring into its internal audit framework 58 .<br />

56 The CAG while reviewing unlisted companies with the objective of assessing compliance with DPE guidelines<br />

has observed that MRVC does not fulfill the requirement of 1/3 rd of independent directors.<br />

57 Article 177 of the MAA stipulates the period of validity up to July 11 2014. MRVC has applied to the <strong>Railway</strong><br />

Board and GOM for deleting the article (letters dated January 15 2010)<br />

58 The Dedicated Freight Corridor <strong>Corporation</strong> of India Limited has developed a risk management strategy which<br />

proposes detailed risk register along with a risk management team.<br />

69


Internal Audit<br />

209. Internal audit is carried out by a firm of chartered accountants under terms of<br />

reference issued by MRVC. The internal audit is continuous 59 and quarterly internal audit reports<br />

are submitted to MRVC. Coordination for internal audit is the responsibility of an SAO reporting<br />

to FA&CAO. Internal audit reports together with management response are reviewed by the<br />

audit committee and by the Board. The statutory auditors have opined that the company has an<br />

adequate internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.<br />

210. From a review of internal audit reports by the <strong>Bank</strong> it appears that the internal<br />

auditors are more focused on day-to-day accounting transactions and thereby fulfilling only a<br />

part of the scope of work relating to transaction reviews. However the internal audit scope of<br />

work requires the auditors to also (i) visit various field offices (ii) assess the adequacy of project<br />

financial management systems including internal controls and remedying weak controls etc (iii)<br />

assess compliance with provisions of financing agreements (iv) judge adequacy of records<br />

maintained regarding assets created and (v) certify eligibility of expenditures charged to projects<br />

and its correct classification and (vi) prepare internal control manual. These areas are not<br />

adequately addressed by internal audit. MRVC appointed new internal auditors from October 1<br />

2009 and monitor the quality of the audit and deliverables.<br />

211. MRVC may consider preparing a detailed internal audit manual to serve as the<br />

basis for internal audit. The audit manual would set out the objectives, scope and coverage of<br />

audit, the detailed methodology of review, audit questionnaires, and the required reporting and<br />

follow up. The internal audit would need to be organization wide (covering project funding,<br />

procurement and projects construction in addition to accounting) and oriented towards mitigating<br />

risks and improving/ strengthening relevant systems and controls. The internal auditors should<br />

also possess the specific skills and experience required to carry out the audit which should go<br />

beyond traditional financial audit. MRVC has assigned the responsibility of developing both the<br />

internal audit and finance manuals to the internal auditors.<br />

212. The IBRD financed MUTP-2A will be subject to internal audit (under agreed<br />

terms of reference) and its reports would be made available to IBRD, on request.<br />

External Audit<br />

213. Under Section 619(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, the Comptroller and Auditor<br />

General (CAG) appoints MRVC’s statutory auditors to carry out an independent audit and<br />

express their opinion as per the requirements of the Companies Act. In addition, the CAG<br />

through its Principal Director of Commercial Audit also conducts supplementary audit under<br />

section 619 (3) (b) of the Companies Act on the audited financial statements. After the<br />

completion of the statutory audit and supplementary audit the audited accounts and auditors’<br />

reports are adopted by the Annual General Meeting of MRVC. Statutory audits of MRVC are on<br />

schedule. The statutory audit reports do not contain any material observations 60 .<br />

59 The internal auditors are required to spend at least two working days every week and the Partner/ Director at least<br />

once a week at MRVC.<br />

60 The 2007-08 audit report points out that accounting of provisions for retirement benefits of employees on<br />

deputation is not on actuarial valuation as prescribed under AS-15. This is being addressed by the management. Also<br />

the auditors have pointed out in their opinion that MRVC has placed reliance on audited/ unaudited statements<br />

pertaining to expenditure incurred on various projects by CR/ WR/ MMRDA and the resultant D&G charges.<br />

70


214. In addition to the audits under the Companies Act MRVC is subject to proprietary<br />

audit/ inspection by the Office of the Principal Director of Commercial Audit. While the<br />

inspection report for FY 2007-08 did not observe any persistent irregularities, the inspection<br />

report for FY 2006-07 contained several observations. MRVC management has responded to the<br />

observations which pertain to project/ contract management and violation of existing guidelines<br />

etc. Only one objection is yet to be resolved 61 .<br />

215. Annual project audit: In addition to the annual entity audit report and accounts,<br />

MRVC would submit to the <strong>Bank</strong> a separate annual project audit report along with the audited<br />

project financial statements by September 30 each year during the currency of the project. It is<br />

proposed that the project (including all components) will be audited by an independent firm of<br />

chartered accountants (which may include the statutory auditors appointed on the advice of<br />

CAG), acceptable to the <strong>Bank</strong>, under agreed terms of reference. The annual audited project<br />

financial statement would separately identify each component under the project, its progress and<br />

the funding sources for each of the components. While certifying the project financial statements<br />

the project auditor would take cognizance of the annual audited utilization statements of the<br />

executing agencies receiving advances from MRVC under the project. The following annual<br />

audit reports will be tracked by the <strong>Bank</strong>’s Audit Reports Compliance System (ARCS):<br />

Table 2. Audit Reports Monitoring<br />

Agency Audit Report Audited By Due Date<br />

MRVC Annual entity audit reports as required under<br />

the Companies Act<br />

Statutory Auditors appointed by<br />

CAG<br />

MRVC Project audit reports Independent firm of Chartered<br />

Accountants<br />

GOI Audit Report of the Designated Account held CAG<br />

at RBI<br />

30 th<br />

September<br />

30 th<br />

September<br />

30 th<br />

September<br />

Disclosure, Transparency and Implementation of Rights to Information (RTI) Act, 2005<br />

216. Under Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 a public authority is required to<br />

maintain and make available detailed records to facilitate right to information. It envisages<br />

computerization of records and accessibility through network. The Act also requires every public<br />

authority to, designate required number of Public Information Officers, in all administrative units<br />

or offices under it and publish particulars of such officers to provide information to persons<br />

requesting for it under the Act.<br />

217. MRVC has developed a separate RTI website. Information relating to the<br />

company, powers/ duties, rules and regulations etc has been posted on the website including<br />

names and contact information of public information officers/ appellate officer.<br />

218. There is a separate vigilance cell in the organization headed by Chief Vigilance<br />

Officer/ Deputy Chief Vigilance Officer. Notifications are issued by Chief Vigilance<br />

Commissioner from time to time.<br />

61<br />

Audit observations and current status: Delay in implementation of MUTP-1, cost overrun of Rs.350.6 crores in<br />

implementation and levy of surcharge of Rs.298.84 crores without providing any additional facilities; (the para is<br />

still open);<br />

71


219. MRVC discloses annual audited statement of accounts in the website. It is a<br />

limited view of the Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account only. During project<br />

implementation the audited project financial statements and other pertinent project-related details<br />

would be disclosed in the website in a suitable manner.<br />

Proposed action plan<br />

220. The proposed action plan with risk assessment and implementation horizon is<br />

summarized below in Table 3. The proposed actions are bifurcated between those that are under<br />

the control of MRVC and its management and those that are under the control of other<br />

stakeholders and prioritized over short to medium term<br />

221. If MRVC faces constraints in staffing while trying to implement some of the<br />

proposed actions as listed below it may consider seeking assistance from reputed and<br />

experienced consultants (or / eminent persons from the sector) in its efforts to further improve<br />

financial accountability and corporate governance.<br />

Table 3. Financial Management Action Plan<br />

Area of Action Risk Actions required<br />

for<br />

implementation<br />

Internal audit<br />

Strengthen internal audit<br />

arrangements in line with<br />

own requirements and<br />

good industry practices;<br />

develop appropriate<br />

internal audit manual<br />

Audit Committee<br />

Induct independent<br />

directors in audit<br />

committee or invite<br />

independent professionals<br />

(in an advisory capacity)<br />

to inject professional<br />

independence and improve<br />

oversight<br />

Action by,<br />

Date<br />

Actions within the control of MRVC (short term)<br />

Internal controls and<br />

risk management are<br />

weakened without a<br />

robust internal review<br />

and follow-up<br />

mechanism<br />

Assurance function is<br />

impaired without<br />

independent review<br />

and recommendation;<br />

risk of ineffective<br />

controls may lead to<br />

future problems<br />

Ensure adherence to<br />

terms of reference by<br />

internal auditors<br />

Develop detailed<br />

internal audit manual<br />

with enlarged scope<br />

covering project/<br />

contract<br />

implementation and<br />

focus on risk<br />

management/<br />

systems<br />

improvement<br />

Induct two<br />

independent (nonofficial)<br />

directors in<br />

the audit committee<br />

2009-10 internal<br />

audit<br />

Final report by<br />

July 2010.<br />

As soon as<br />

appointed as<br />

Board nonofficial<br />

directors.<br />

Remarks<br />

New auditors<br />

appointed from<br />

October 2009 with<br />

fresh TOR.<br />

Adherence to TOR<br />

to be monitored.<br />

Internal auditors to<br />

prepare internal<br />

audit manual. To be<br />

shared with the<br />

<strong>Bank</strong><br />

Serving non-official<br />

director to retire in<br />

May 2010. MRVC<br />

has requested GOM<br />

and MOR to appoint<br />

non-official<br />

directors.<br />

Strengthen oversight by<br />

audit committee in line<br />

with corporate governance<br />

requirements<br />

Increase frequency of<br />

audit committee<br />

meetings to four as<br />

per DPE guidelines<br />

From FY 2011-<br />

12 onwards<br />

Currently meetings<br />

are half-yearly since<br />

financial statements<br />

reporting to the<br />

Board is half-yearly.<br />

MRVC to increase<br />

the frequency with<br />

the introduction of<br />

72


FM capacity<br />

Fill vacancies and train and<br />

build capacity<br />

In-year reporting to<br />

management<br />

Introduce quarterly<br />

financial reporting to BoD<br />

as per corporate<br />

governance requirements<br />

Financial management<br />

Manuals<br />

Update the finance and<br />

accounts manual for a<br />

more formalized and<br />

elaborate coverage of<br />

MRVC’s activities to<br />

strengthen financial<br />

management environment<br />

Computerized MIS<br />

Assess requirements of<br />

organization wide MIS and<br />

prepare computerization<br />

strategy and road map<br />

Inadequate capacity<br />

will affect level of<br />

efficiency and lead to<br />

delays<br />

Proper and adequate<br />

information not<br />

available in timely<br />

fashion for informed<br />

decision making;<br />

delays in corrective<br />

actions<br />

Recruit/ depute staff<br />

as per project<br />

requirement<br />

Prepare un-audited<br />

financial statements<br />

on a quarterly basis<br />

with closing entries<br />

compare with budget<br />

and provide variance<br />

analysis<br />

Replacement<br />

staff in place to<br />

avoid vacancy.<br />

From FY 2011-<br />

12<br />

Inconsistent/<br />

improper practices to<br />

the possible detriment<br />

of the organization;<br />

risk of becoming<br />

person dependent<br />

rather than process<br />

dependent<br />

Initiate action for<br />

updating the<br />

following:<br />

(a) Schedule of<br />

Powers<br />

(b)Budgeting<br />

(c) Project<br />

Accounting<br />

(d) General<br />

Accounting<br />

(e) Internal Controls<br />

(f) Procurement<br />

(g) Contract<br />

Management<br />

(h) Reporting<br />

Final report by<br />

July 2010<br />

Actions within the control of MRVC (medium term)<br />

Failure to get<br />

properly automated<br />

and integrated in a<br />

timely fashion with<br />

consequences - need<br />

for manual<br />

intervention; delays,<br />

duplications and<br />

possibility of errors;<br />

proper and adequate<br />

information not<br />

available in timely<br />

fashion for informed<br />

decision making;<br />

delays in corrective<br />

actions<br />

Develop terms of<br />

reference and<br />

commence work<br />

Computerization<br />

road map to be<br />

ready by May<br />

2010<br />

quarterly financial<br />

statement reporting<br />

to the Board.<br />

Key FM staff slated<br />

to revert to Indian<br />

<strong>Railway</strong>s including<br />

FA&CAO and SAO.<br />

Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s to<br />

ensure proper<br />

addition/replacement<br />

with adequate time<br />

for hand-over.<br />

Currently half yearly<br />

financial statements<br />

are submitted to the<br />

Board; MRVC plans<br />

to increase the<br />

frequency when<br />

acceptable<br />

expenditure<br />

statements are<br />

received from the<br />

executing agencies.<br />

Consultant<br />

appointed to prepare<br />

finance manuals<br />

Assignment<br />

outsourced<br />

73


Actions beyond the control of MRVC but critical from management and corporate<br />

governance perspective<br />

Independent Directors<br />

Induct independent<br />

directors/ eminent<br />

professionals to enhance<br />

the level of corporate<br />

governance<br />

Extension of validity<br />

period of MRVC beyond<br />

2014<br />

Creates impression<br />

that company lacks<br />

independence and that<br />

adequate<br />

professionalism and<br />

objectivity are not<br />

brought into decision<br />

making; noncompliance<br />

with<br />

Departmental<br />

guidelines and<br />

organization’s<br />

Articles of<br />

Association<br />

Lack of lasting vision,<br />

ad-hoc decisions and<br />

barrier to<br />

improvements.<br />

MUTP-2A may not<br />

be fully implemented<br />

within the validity<br />

period<br />

Initiate consultations<br />

with appropriate<br />

authorities<br />

Obtain in principle<br />

approval.<br />

Clear timeline<br />

for appointment<br />

by July 2010<br />

By May 2010<br />

One independent<br />

director in place; to<br />

retire in May 2010.<br />

The number should<br />

be compliant with<br />

DPE guidelines.<br />

74


Annex 8: Procurement Arrangements<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

A. General<br />

222. Procurement for the proposed project would be carried out in accordance with the<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>’s "Guidelines: Procurement Under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits" dated May 2004<br />

revised October 2006 (Procurement Guidelines); and "Guidelines: Selection and Employment of<br />

Consultants by <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Borrowers" dated May 2004 revised October 2006 (Consultant<br />

Guidelines), and the provisions stipulated in the Legal Agreement.<br />

223. The various items under different expenditure categories are described in general<br />

below. For each contract to be financed by the Loan/Credit, the different procurement methods<br />

or consultant selection methods, the need for pre-qualification, estimated costs, prior review<br />

requirements, and time frame are agreed between the Borrower and the <strong>Bank</strong> in the Procurement<br />

Plan. The Procurement Plan will be updated at least annually or as required to reflect the actual<br />

project implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity.<br />

224. Procurement of Goods and Works: There are no Works envisaged to be<br />

procured using <strong>Bank</strong>’s SBDs for Works, at this stage. Goods to be procured under this project<br />

include (i) Electrics for 3-phase EMUs (Rolling Stock) and (ii) OHE Maintenance Car and will<br />

be procured using <strong>Bank</strong>’s SBD for Goods on ICB basis. Procurement of other items include (iii)<br />

Setting up of Traction Substation at Chinchpokli and Sion and six Switching posts, (iv) Supply<br />

and Installation of 110 kV cable for Chinchpokli and Sion traction substations and (v) Digital<br />

Axle Counters and will be done using the <strong>Bank</strong>’s Standard Bidding <strong>Document</strong>s (SBD) for<br />

Supply and Installation on ICB basis. In addition, the Project envisages procurement of<br />

Information System including TA for suburban Rail Simulation Model and Power Supply<br />

Simulation Study, for which the procurement method will be ICB with post qualification, using<br />

<strong>Bank</strong>’s SBD for procurement of Information Systems.<br />

225. Pre-Qualification of Bidders: Procurement of Goods and Works will follow postqualification<br />

of bidders and pre-qualification procedures are not envisaged.<br />

226. Domestic Preference: The project procurement does not envisage providing any<br />

domestic preferences and has adopted the default provisions of the <strong>Bank</strong> SBD.<br />

227. No procurement requiring National Competitive Bidding (NCB) method of<br />

procurement is envisaged under the project, If, however, some smaller value contracts for<br />

Works/ Goods are identified during implementation, these shall be procured using model<br />

documents as agreed with and satisfactory to the <strong>Bank</strong>.NCB contracts, if any, will be awarded in<br />

accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.3 and 3.4 of the Procurement Guidelines<br />

("Guidelines: Procurement Under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits" dated May 2004 revised<br />

October 2006). All NCB contracts to be financed from the proceeds of the loan will follow the<br />

procedures described in Chapter 5 of the MUTP-2A Implementation Manual and the following<br />

conditions shall apply:<br />

a. Only the model bidding documents for NCB agreed with the GOI Task Force<br />

(and as amended from time to time) shall be used for bidding.<br />

b. Invitations to bid shall be advertised in at least one widely circulated national<br />

daily newspaper at least 30 days prior to the deadline for the submission of bids.<br />

75


c. No special preference will be accorded to any bidder either for price or for other<br />

terms and conditions when competing with foreign bidders, state-owned<br />

enterprises, small scale enterprises or enterprises from any given state.<br />

d. Except with the prior concurrence of the <strong>Bank</strong>, there shall be no negotiation of<br />

price with the bidders even with the lowest evaluated bidder.<br />

e. Extension of bid validity shall not be allowed without the prior concurrence of the<br />

<strong>Bank</strong> (i) for the first request for extension if it is longer than four weeks and (ii)<br />

for all subsequent requests for extension irrespective of the period (such<br />

concurrence will be considered by <strong>Bank</strong> only in cases of Force Majeure and<br />

circumstances beyond the control of the project).<br />

f. Re-bidding shall not be carried out without the prior concurrence of the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />

The system of rejecting bids outside a pre-determined margin or “bracket” of<br />

prices shall not be used in the project.<br />

g. Rate contracts entered into by Director General of Supplies and Disposal will not<br />

be acceptable as a substitute for NCB procedures. Such contracts will be<br />

acceptable, however, for any procurement under National Shopping procedures.<br />

h. Two or three envelop system will not be used.<br />

228. Selection of Consultants: Consulting services procured under this project would<br />

include: TA for development program for <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail services, TA to support the<br />

development of Indian <strong>Railway</strong> Long Term Strategy, TA for revenue maximizing study for<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> rail suburban system, TA for suburban ticketing system for Central and Western<br />

<strong>Railway</strong>s, TA for design for passenger information and security within <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail<br />

system, and TA for study to improve environmental management of operation of Central and<br />

Western <strong>Railway</strong>s.<br />

229. For all consultant procurement, the <strong>Bank</strong>’s Standard Request for Proposal (SRFP)<br />

document and pertinent Form of Contract shall be used.<br />

230. The following methods of selection will be adopted depending upon size and<br />

complexity of assignment, as defined in the Consultancy Guidelines:<br />

a. Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS)<br />

b. Quality Based Selection (QBS)<br />

c. Selection under Fixed Budget (FBS)<br />

d. Least Cost Selection (LCS)<br />

e. Selection based on Consultant’s Qualifications (CQS)<br />

f. Single Source Selection (SSS)<br />

g. Individuals<br />

231. The services of individual consultants will be procured as per the provisions<br />

stipulated in paragraphs 5.1 to 5.4 of the <strong>Bank</strong>’s Guidelines.<br />

232. Retroactive Financing: The Project has issued some of the Bidding <strong>Document</strong>s<br />

inviting bids for awarded contracts following <strong>Bank</strong>’s Procurement Guidelines and agreed format<br />

of Bidding <strong>Document</strong>s. One contract has already been awarded and others are in various stages<br />

76


of bidding. These contracts if awarded, prior to the project loan effectiveness, as these would<br />

have been prior review contracts, cleared with the <strong>Bank</strong>, will be eligible for retroactive financing<br />

as per the criteria for such funding specified in the Lon Agreement. The amount of funding, if<br />

and where applicable, for such contracts as meeting the criteria, will not exceed 20 percent of the<br />

loan amount.<br />

233. The procurement plan compiled for all the identified packages under the projects<br />

and the consultancies procedures and SBDs to be used for each procurement method, as well as<br />

model contracts for works and goods procured, are presented in Chapter 5 of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban<br />

Transport Project 2A Implementation Manual.<br />

B. Assessment of the agency’s capacity to implement procurement<br />

234. Procurement under the project will be carried out by MRVC. MOR has<br />

implemented <strong>Bank</strong>’s project covered over several loans in modernization of the rail transport.<br />

Generally the officers are aware of the procurement procedures followed in <strong>Bank</strong> financed<br />

projects. MRVC will depute some representatives who will deal with this procurement to the<br />

training programs organized by Administrative Staff College of India (ASCI), National Institute<br />

of Financial Management (NIFM) or other reputed institute for updating their knowledge on<br />

procurement.<br />

235. MRVC has been delegated authority by IR to take procurement decisions for<br />

contracts up to a value of Rs. 1,000 million (approx. US$20 million). All contracts except the<br />

one for the procurement of Electrical Multiple Units (EMUs) and kits shall be within the<br />

threshold of the US$ 200 million. The value of EMU contract is expected to be over US$200<br />

million. In this case, the bid evaluation would be carried out by a committee of MRVC and<br />

RDSO and forwarded to Indian <strong>Railway</strong> Board for review and approval of recommendations.<br />

236. Furthermore, <strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> Limited (MRVC) has<br />

performed satisfactorily compared with the other agencies involved in the implementation of<br />

MUTP-1, both on procurement and implementation of contracts. In the process, MRVC has<br />

acquired reasonable proficiency in procurement capacity following <strong>Bank</strong> guidelines and SBDs.<br />

However, for this project, <strong>Bank</strong>’s revised SBDs (2007 and 2008 for Works, Supply and<br />

installation and Goods procurement) will be applicable. The SBD for Supply and Installation has<br />

substantial changes from the previous version, which was applicable for MUTP-1 and with<br />

which these officials are well versed. In order to familiarize these officers of MRVC, the <strong>Bank</strong><br />

apart from discussions on these bidding documents during missions organized a workshop at<br />

New Delhi, which was attended by senior officers of MRVC. During these discussions and<br />

workshop, several concerns of MRVC officials were clarified. Draft bidding documents for<br />

major procurements covered under the project have already been prepared. One contract has<br />

been awarded and two are in advanced stage of bidding process. The main bidding document for<br />

procurement of Electrics (EMU Rolling Stock) has been issued.<br />

237. The responsibilities of MRVC officials inter-alia include duties pertaining to<br />

Procurement function. The procurement function is staffed by officers of MRVC at various<br />

levels as stated in the table 1 below.<br />

77


NATURE OF<br />

POWERS<br />

Invitation of Works<br />

Tenders<br />

Managing<br />

Director<br />

Table 1. Staffing of Procurement Functions at MRVC<br />

Director<br />

Open tenders/ prequalified<br />

tenderers<br />

Million<br />

Up to INR 250<br />

Limited tenders Up to INR 250<br />

Million<br />

Single tenders Up to INR 50<br />

Million<br />

Accepting authority<br />

Issue of acceptance<br />

letter and signing<br />

of contract<br />

agreement.<br />

Consultancy<br />

Tenders/Contracts<br />

Invitation of<br />

Consultancy<br />

Tenders<br />

Composition of<br />

tenders evaluation<br />

committee.<br />

Accepting<br />

Authority<br />

Variation in<br />

consultancy<br />

contract<br />

Over INR<br />

500 Million<br />

up to INR<br />

1000<br />

Million<br />

Full Powers<br />

Over INR 100<br />

Million up to INR<br />

500 Million.<br />

Over INR 500<br />

Million up to INR<br />

1000 Million<br />

a) Full powers for<br />

feasibility, detailed<br />

engineering and<br />

supervision of<br />

works (PMC).<br />

b) Full powers for<br />

hiring consultancy<br />

services pertaining<br />

to execution of<br />

works other than<br />

specified at a)<br />

above up to INR<br />

25000/- each case<br />

subject to a ceiling<br />

of INR 500,000 /<br />

annum<br />

Full powers.<br />

Full power in<br />

consultation with<br />

Finance<br />

Senior<br />

Administrative<br />

Grade (Chief<br />

Engineers etc.)<br />

(SAG)<br />

Up to INR 30<br />

Million<br />

Up to INR 30<br />

Million<br />

Up to INR 10<br />

Million<br />

Up to INR 100<br />

Million<br />

Over INR 100<br />

Million up to INR<br />

500 Million<br />

-<br />

Selection Grade/<br />

Junior<br />

Administrative<br />

Grade (SG/ JA)<br />

REMARKS<br />

The tenders will be opened in the<br />

presence of one officer from the<br />

Executive department and one<br />

Accounts representative and an<br />

opening register will be maintained<br />

for noting the salient details of the<br />

offers as per the guidelines. The<br />

comparative statement of offers, a<br />

detailed briefing note containing<br />

technical conformity statement as<br />

per the laid down parameters and<br />

specifications will be prepared by<br />

the Executive of the department<br />

concerned of the rank not lower<br />

than Sr.Scale.<br />

- Finance Concurrence required<br />

- Finance Concurrence required<br />

- For tenders of value more than INR<br />

1000 Million, evaluation<br />

committee shall consists of three<br />

Directors including Director<br />

(Finance) for acceptance of<br />

<strong>Railway</strong> Board with MD’s<br />

recommendation<br />

Up to INR 100<br />

Million<br />

Finance vetting required.<br />

For foreign companies, Legal<br />

vetting also required<br />

Nil Nil Prior finance concurrence will be<br />

required if the consultancy is not an<br />

approved item in the consolidated<br />

MUTP estimate costing more than<br />

Rs.25000/-<br />

To consist of three<br />

SAG officers<br />

consisting of one<br />

Finance Member. In<br />

case of nonavailability,<br />

next<br />

lower category<br />

Finance officer (full<br />

powers).<br />

Full powers of<br />

acceptance for<br />

tenders dealt by the<br />

JA/SG Committee.<br />

Full powers for<br />

tenders within<br />

acceptance limits, in<br />

consultation with<br />

Finance.<br />

To consist of three<br />

JA/SG Officers,<br />

(Finance Member<br />

can be of next<br />

lower grade) of<br />

tenders up to INR<br />

1Million<br />

Variation in consultancy contracts<br />

approved by <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>, if any,<br />

will require prior approval of<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> with Finance<br />

comments.<br />

78


NATURE OF<br />

POWERS<br />

Extension of<br />

Contract<br />

Managing<br />

Director<br />

Director<br />

Full powers for<br />

contract within<br />

their power of<br />

acceptance<br />

Senior<br />

Administrative<br />

Grade (Chief<br />

Engineers etc.)<br />

(SAG)<br />

Full powers for<br />

contracts within their<br />

power of acceptance<br />

Selection Grade/<br />

Junior<br />

Administrative<br />

Grade (SG/ JA)<br />

NIL<br />

REMARKS<br />

Subject to<br />

a) no loss to the administration<br />

b) Contract is not awarded on the<br />

grounds of earlier completion<br />

period.<br />

Variations in Contract<br />

Contract<br />

Conditions<br />

Quantities beyond<br />

permitted<br />

percentage in the<br />

contract.<br />

Full powers for<br />

contracts with in<br />

their power of<br />

acceptance.<br />

Up to 50 percent<br />

of initial contract<br />

value provided<br />

enhanced value of<br />

contract is within<br />

his power of<br />

acceptance<br />

Full powers for<br />

contracts with in<br />

their power of<br />

acceptance.<br />

Up to 25 percent of<br />

initial contract value<br />

provided enhanced<br />

value of contract is<br />

within his power of<br />

acceptance<br />

NIL<br />

NIL<br />

Any change having financial<br />

implication shall require<br />

concurrence of finance<br />

Prior finance concurrence shall be<br />

required for overall variation in<br />

excess of 25 percent of original<br />

contract value and for overall<br />

variation of individual item in<br />

excess of 25 percent of schedule<br />

quantity. For foundation items,<br />

however, the variation limit of 25<br />

percent will not apply and prior<br />

finance concurrences will not be<br />

required.<br />

For processing variation in excess<br />

of 25 percent Engineering Code<br />

provisions shall be adopted to<br />

explore possible cost reduction<br />

Introduction of<br />

additional items in<br />

contract.<br />

Full power<br />

provided the<br />

revised cost of the<br />

work is within the<br />

power of original<br />

sanctioning<br />

authority”.<br />

Full power provided<br />

the revised cost of<br />

the work is within<br />

the power of original<br />

sanctioning<br />

authority”.<br />

NIL<br />

All such cases require concurrence<br />

of finance<br />

238. An assessment of the capacity of the Implementing Agency to implement<br />

procurement actions for the project has been carried out based on the information provided in<br />

response to the Questionnaire, by MRVC and considering the experience of the bank team<br />

during implementation of the MUTP-1. The assessment reviewed the organizational structure<br />

for implementing the project and the interaction between the project’s staff responsible for<br />

procurement at MRVC.<br />

239. The Table 2 below, sums up the Procurement Capacity Risk and Mitigation Action<br />

Plan agreed with MRVC:<br />

Table 2. Procurement Risk Mitigation Action Plan<br />

Action Due Status/ Completed<br />

Agree on appropriate dispute December<br />

resolution provisions for 31, 2009<br />

contracts (at least for <strong>Bank</strong><br />

financed ones, note that it is<br />

mandatory for ICB).<br />

Agree on list of unacceptable<br />

NCB issues and on removal<br />

from documents to be used for<br />

<strong>Bank</strong> financed procurement.<br />

December<br />

31, 2009<br />

<strong>Bank</strong>'s SBDs/ Model documents for ICB<br />

and NCB will be used, which provides for<br />

these requirements adequately. Action<br />

completed.<br />

Same as above. Conditions agreed to<br />

already.<br />

Pending Action/ due<br />

on<br />

Nil<br />

Nil<br />

79


Arrange for training on<br />

procurement planning and use<br />

of new SBDs of the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />

September<br />

30, 2010<br />

This is being implemented and details of<br />

the staff that has undergone such training<br />

shall be provided to the <strong>Bank</strong>. Also a<br />

detailed list of training scheduled for the<br />

next year will be prepared and provided<br />

for information of the <strong>Bank</strong><br />

Will be continuous<br />

exercise during the<br />

implementation<br />

phase<br />

Improvement / Modernization<br />

of Records Management<br />

Systems<br />

Capacity Building in<br />

Contracts Management<br />

December<br />

31, 2010<br />

December<br />

31, 2010<br />

Project will carry out internal/<br />

independent assessment to improve/<br />

modernize records management systems<br />

Project will draw out a plan of training<br />

activities for staff to enhance their skills<br />

in the area of Contracts Management<br />

During project<br />

implementation<br />

During project<br />

implementation<br />

240. The overall project risk for procurement is ‘Moderate’.<br />

C. Methods of Procurement<br />

Goods and Works<br />

241. Goods/ Information Systems, estimated to cost US$500,000 or more per contract;<br />

and Works/ Turnkey Contracts/ Supply and Installation Contracts, estimated to cost<br />

US$10,000,000 or more per contract will be procured following ICB procedures as per Section II<br />

of the Procurement Guidelines. Goods/ Information Systems, estimated to cost US$30,000 or<br />

more but less than US$500,000 per contract and Works/ Turnkey Contracts/ Supply and<br />

Installation Contracts, estimated to cost US$30,000 or more but less than US$10,000,000 per<br />

contract may be procured following NCB procedures, meeting the requirement of Paragraphs 3.3<br />

and 3.4 of the Procurement Guidelines.<br />

242. Goods and Works estimated to cost less than US$30,000 per contract may be<br />

procured following Shopping procedures which meet the requirement of Paragraph 3.5 of the<br />

Procurement Guidelines.<br />

243. Goods and Works which meet the requirement of Paragraph 3.6 of Procurement.<br />

244. Guidelines may be procured following Direct Contracting Procedures.<br />

Hiring of Consultants<br />

245. Shortlists of consultants for services estimated to cost less than US$ 500,000<br />

equivalent per contract may be composed entirely of national consultants in accordance with the<br />

provisions of Paragraph 2.7 of the Consultant Guidelines.<br />

246. The following methods of selection will be adopted depending upon size and<br />

complexity of assignment, as defined in the Consultancy Guidelines:<br />

Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS)<br />

Quality Based Selection (QBS)<br />

Selection under Fixed Budget (FBS)<br />

Least Cost Selection (LCS)<br />

Selection based on Consultant’s Qualifications (CQS)<br />

Single Source Selection (SSS)<br />

80


Individuals<br />

247. The services of individual consultants will be procured as per the provisions<br />

stipulated in paragraphs 5.1 to 5.4 of the <strong>Bank</strong>’s Guidelines.<br />

D. Review Requirements<br />

248. Contracts for Works/ Turnkey Contracts/ Supply and Installation Contracts,<br />

estimated to cost over US$10 million; and those for Goods/ Information Systems, estimated to<br />

cost over US$1,000,000 equivalent per contract, shall be subject to prior review by the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />

249. Thresholds for prior review by the <strong>Bank</strong> will be reviewed during the<br />

implementation of project, based on reviews by the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />

250. All contracts awarded on Direct Contracting basis, will be subject to prior review<br />

by the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />

251. The prior review threshold for Consultancy Contracts with firms is proposed at<br />

US$200,000 equivalent, whereas the same for individual consultants is proposed as US$50,000<br />

equivalent. Further, sole source contracts to firms estimated to cost US$100,000 or more and to<br />

individuals estimated to cost US$20,000 or more will be subject to prior review.<br />

252. All contracts not covered under prior review arrangements specified above, will be<br />

subject to post award review/ review during supervision missions/ review by consultants to be<br />

appointed by the by <strong>Bank</strong><br />

E. Procurement Plan<br />

253. The Borrower, at appraisal, developed a procurement plan for project<br />

implementation which provides the basis for the procurement methods. This plan, included in the<br />

Implementation Manual, has been agreed between the Borrower and the Project Team on April<br />

30, 2010 and is available at <strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> <strong>Ltd</strong>, 2nd Floor, Churchgate<br />

Station Building, <strong>Mumbai</strong> – 400 020, India. It will also be available in the project’s database and<br />

in the <strong>Bank</strong>’s external website. The Procurement Plan will be updated in agreement with the<br />

Project Team annually or as required to reflect the actual project implementation needs and<br />

improvements in institutional capacity.<br />

F. Frequency of Procurement Supervision<br />

254. In addition to the prior review supervision to be carried out from <strong>Bank</strong> offices, the<br />

capacity assessment of the Implementing Agency has recommended that the procurement<br />

arrangement and implementation progress should be reviewed during six monthly supervision<br />

missions, which shall also include need based visits to the field and to carry out post review of<br />

procurement actions.<br />

255. Procurement information will be collected and recorded as follows:<br />

(a) Prompt reporting of contract award information for the respective components;<br />

(b) Comprehensive quarterly reports indicating,<br />

(i) Revised cost estimates for individual contracts and total cost;<br />

81


(ii) Revised timings of procurement actions including advertising, bidding, contract award<br />

and completion time for individual contracts; and<br />

(iii)Compliance report by the borrower within three months of the loan signing date<br />

G. Details of the Procurement Arrangements Involving International Competition<br />

256. Goods, Works, and Non Consulting Services<br />

(a) List of contract packages to be procured following ICB and direct contracting:<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />

Ref. No.<br />

GOODS<br />

MUTP2A-G1<br />

Contract<br />

(Description)<br />

Procurement of<br />

electrics for 3-<br />

phase EMUs<br />

Procurement of<br />

OHE<br />

MUTP2A-G2<br />

maintenance<br />

car<br />

SUPPLY AND INSTALLATION<br />

Procurement of<br />

digital axle<br />

MUTP2A-W1<br />

counter and<br />

quad cable<br />

Setting up of<br />

traction<br />

substations at<br />

MUTP2A-W2 Chinchpokli<br />

and Sion and<br />

six switching<br />

posts<br />

Supply and<br />

installation of<br />

110 kV cables<br />

MUTP2A-W3 for Chinchpokli<br />

and Sion<br />

traction<br />

substations<br />

MUTP2A- Power Supply<br />

TA8<br />

MUTP2A-<br />

TA9<br />

Simulation<br />

Rail Operations<br />

Simulation<br />

Estimated<br />

Cost<br />

($ Million)<br />

Proc.<br />

Method<br />

P-Q<br />

Domestic<br />

Preference<br />

(yes/no)<br />

Review<br />

by <strong>Bank</strong><br />

(Prior /<br />

Post)<br />

Expected<br />

Bid-<br />

Opening<br />

Date<br />

355.7 ICB No No Prior Sep 2010<br />

17.3 ICB No No Prior 31.10.10<br />

15.7 ICB No No Prior 30.06.10<br />

15.7 ICB No No Prior 31.05.10<br />

6.5 ICB No No Prior 11.08.09<br />

0.9 ICB No No Prior 30.11.10<br />

0.6 ICB No No Prior 30.09.10<br />

Comments<br />

Bidding<br />

<strong>Document</strong>s<br />

reviewed by<br />

the <strong>Bank</strong><br />

Contract<br />

awarded<br />

257. Slice and Package: If a transaction comprises several packages, lots and slices,<br />

the aggregate estimated value of all contract(s) resulting out of the bidding process will<br />

determine the applicable threshold for deciding about the review requirements. Further, Scope of<br />

Work or Requirements for procurement of Goods shall not be broken down into several packages<br />

to reduce the review requirements or to resort to a less competitive method of procurement.<br />

82


258. Consulting Services<br />

a) List of consulting assignments with short-list of international firms.<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

Ref. No.<br />

MUTP2A-TA1<br />

MUTP2A- TA2<br />

MUTP2A- TA3<br />

MUTP2A- TA4<br />

MUTP2A- TA5<br />

MUTP2A- TA6<br />

MUTP2A- TA7<br />

Description of<br />

Assignment<br />

Development Program for<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban Rail<br />

Services<br />

Provision to support the<br />

development of the Indian<br />

<strong>Railway</strong>s long term<br />

strategy for Suburban Rail<br />

Revenue maximizing study<br />

in particular for non-fare<br />

box revenue and<br />

affordability for<br />

commuters<br />

More efficient and user<br />

friendly ticket issuing<br />

Passenger information and<br />

security<br />

Reduction of trespassing<br />

and improvement of safety<br />

on the track<br />

Improved Environmental<br />

Management of Rail<br />

Operations<br />

Estimated<br />

Cost ($<br />

million)<br />

Selection<br />

Method<br />

Review<br />

by <strong>Bank</strong><br />

(Prior /<br />

Post)<br />

Expected<br />

Proposals<br />

Submission<br />

Date<br />

5.40 QCBS Prior 31.08.2010<br />

1.60 QCBS Prior 31.01.2011<br />

1.10 QCBS Prior 01.10.2010<br />

0.50 QCBS Prior 31.07.2010<br />

0.50 QCBS Prior 31.07.2010<br />

0.10 CPF 30.06.2010<br />

0.50 QCBS Prior 31.08.2010<br />

MUTP2A- TA10 Training 3.20 QCBS Prior 31.07.2010<br />

Comments<br />

H. Anti- Corruption Measures<br />

259. The project has prepared a GAAP which is presented in Annex 6A. The key issues<br />

and risks concerning implementation of the project have been identified, including those<br />

relating to Procurement, listed in the Table 1 - Governance and Accountability Action Plan.<br />

260. GAAP also identifies the risks associated with procurement processes, namely<br />

weak disclosure of project information leading to low stakeholder participation and<br />

accountability, weak complaint and grievance redress mechanisms, risk of collusion, fraud and<br />

corruption in procurement, and weak institutional capacity for project implementation. Actions<br />

pertaining to mitigating these risks include (a) suo motu disclosure of information, development<br />

of better systems for record and document management; (b) establish procedures to deal with<br />

external complaints on procurement, fraud/corruption and construction quality; (c) tracking of<br />

the status of complaints, related investigations and measures; (d) a transparent policy describing<br />

incentives for whistleblowers, sanctions for staff found indulging in fraudulent behavior; (e)<br />

strengthening of internal audit, project monitoring and contract management arrangements; (g)<br />

building a database with procurement and contractor performance data from the project such as<br />

number of bids received, bid prices, unit prices, specifications, time and cost overruns and (h) a<br />

comprehensive training needs assessment for its entire staff, and finalize a training plan.<br />

83


Introduction<br />

Annex 9: Economic and Financial Analysis<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

261. This annex presents the results of the economic evaluation of the procurement of<br />

an additional 72 12-car rakes for the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban system. This is expected to yield a net<br />

present value over 35 years of operation of over US$262 million (2008 prices discounted at 12<br />

percent to 2010) and to achieve an economic rate of return of 17 percent. It also summarizes the<br />

projected financial performance of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban system and relates it to the overall<br />

financial performance of Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s.<br />

Background and Project Description<br />

262. Passenger traffic on the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban system has been growing steadily for<br />

over two decades, during which time the network and fleet has been progressively expanded and<br />

improved. MUTP-1, signed in 2002, included a component for the supply of additional rakes and<br />

is now nearing completion. During this time, the conversion of the suburban network from DC to<br />

AC traction has also been taking place to enable the more intensive service to be operated.<br />

However, the trains remain probably the most crowded in the world and the current project aims<br />

to provide a further 72 12-car rakes to provide additional capacity as well as completing the first<br />

phase of conversion from DC to AC and providing maintenance facilities for the additional rakes<br />

and stabling lines.<br />

Traffic Forecast<br />

263. The model used to derive the traffic forecasts and the associated system operating<br />

costs was originally developed as part of the Financial and Institutional Study of the <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />

Suburban System in 1996. It has been used for over a decade by MRVC and has been<br />

continuously validated by comparing its forecasts, assuming the changes in these four variables<br />

that actually occurred, with what has occurred in practice. This comparison has showed a close<br />

correspondence and the model is considered a robust tool suitable for forecasting demand in this<br />

project. It has three main sets of inputs:<br />

(a) financial and economic parameters;<br />

(b) base operating statistics;<br />

(c) parameters for forecasting traffic demand, earnings and operating expenses.<br />

264. Passenger demand was projected taking into account:<br />

(a) assumed annual population growth in the part of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region<br />

served by the suburban railway of 1.8 percent<br />

(b) changes in the key service parameters of service frequency, new routes, fares and<br />

crowding, using the elasticities given in Table 1. These are the same as used in the<br />

original MUTP-1 forecasts except for the elasticity with respect to network size (as<br />

measured by route-km). This was reduced from 0.2 to 0.1 as the new routes now<br />

proposed would pass through sparsely populated areas. The original MUTP-1 forecasts<br />

are based on a 1996 consultant study which undertook time-series analysis of demand to<br />

establish fare elasticities and stated preference studies to estimate the impact of<br />

crowding on demand through a willingness to pay approach, complemented by a<br />

willingness to pay estimate of in-vehicle time.<br />

84


Table 1. Assumed Demand Elasticities<br />

Parameter<br />

Elasticity<br />

Fare - 0.3<br />

Route Kms + 0.1<br />

Service + 0.1<br />

Crowding - 0.2<br />

(c) Increase in the per capita trip rate of 0.2 percent per annum, based on the recently<br />

concluded Comprehensive Transport Study.<br />

(d) Increase in average trip length of 0.5 percent per annum. Although the historical data<br />

shows a much higher growth, the shifting of business districts towards the north of<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> and the improved transport infrastructure for east-west connectivity is likely to<br />

reduce the average trip length on the suburban system.<br />

(e) Fares are assumed to increase at the same rate as inflation in the long run, i.e. fares will<br />

be constant in real terms. The fare surcharge is assumed to continue till the loan for<br />

MUTP-1 is paid back and no additional surcharge was considered. A sensitivity test also<br />

considered the case in which fares remain constant in nominal terms; as inflation is<br />

forecast at eight percent p.a. this is equivalent to a reduction in real fares of 7.4 percent<br />

p.a.<br />

(f) Service plans (train frequency and size) were derived from the current suburban railway<br />

timetable and the future timetables developed during project planning.<br />

265. The key assumptions used to calculate operating costs are:<br />

(a) base costs taken from the annual cost analysis of suburban services<br />

(b) no change in the real cost of energy but reductions in energy consumption of dual<br />

voltage rakes of ten percent because of reduced starting resistance and ten percent from<br />

regeneration;<br />

(c) a reduction in maintenance cost of new rakes of 15 percent;<br />

(d) savings in energy consumption in sections converted from DC to AC of five percent<br />

from reductions in transmission losses and five percent because of improved reception of<br />

regenerated energy;<br />

(e) reduction of 60 percent in the maintenance cost of power supply installations in the<br />

converted sections;<br />

(f) reduction in transmission losses of about five percent on the energy consumed by main<br />

line trains on DC to AC converted suburban sections.<br />

266. The reduction in operating costs as a result of AC conversion have all been<br />

estimated by MRVC based on experience gained during the first phase of the AC-DC<br />

conversion. The base operating and demand statistics were taken from the published statistics for<br />

2006/7. These give, for each of Central and Western <strong>Railway</strong>s, passengers, passenger-km,<br />

vehicle-km, train-km and gross tonne-km.<br />

Economic Analysis Framework<br />

267. The economic analysis compares the incremental costs and benefits of the project<br />

compared to delaying the purchase of additional rakes until 2022.<br />

85


268. Project Costs: These cover the capital cost of the incremental rakes, the<br />

conversion from DC to AC of the remaining network and additional maintenance facilities<br />

(Table 2).<br />

Table 2. Incremental Capital Costs<br />

(Rs crores) US$ (million)<br />

2009-10 130 27<br />

2010-11 316 66<br />

2011-12 623 130<br />

2012-13 1127 235<br />

2013-14 1359 283<br />

2014-15 735 153<br />

Total 4290 894<br />

Converted at US$1 = Rs 48<br />

269. The project costs also include the operating cost of the additional services that are<br />

run in the Project Case, net of the reduction in unit operating cost caused by the more economical<br />

AC units.<br />

270. Terminal values of the assets have been based on the remaining lives of the assets<br />

in the final year of the analysis. The financial costs have been converted into economic costs<br />

using a conversion factor of 0.9.<br />

271. Benefits: These include the following:<br />

(a) The reduction in crowding will reduce travel discomfort for passengers. This was valued<br />

at Rs.3.5 per hour (2001 prices) in the economic analysis of MUTP-1, based on stated<br />

preference surveys undertaken as part of project preparation. This has been updated to<br />

Rs.5.0 per hour at 2008 prices.<br />

(b) Savings in time due to (i) reduced journey time, and (ii) reduced waiting time due to<br />

increase in the frequency of trains once rakes are put into service. Journey time savings<br />

accounted for 32 percent of economic savings (compared to 24 percent in MUTP-1). The<br />

current evaluation does not include benefits from waiting time savings, as these would<br />

be relatively small at peak periods (if they were included at the conventional value of<br />

twice in-vehicle time, they would increase total net benefits by over 40 percent). Thus,<br />

the benefit accruing due to reduction in waiting time has not been taken into account<br />

while calculating the ERR. The value of time was derived in the CTS study as Rs.25.00<br />

per hour (2006 prices). This has been updated to Rs.27.50 per hour for the base year<br />

(2008) and increased by five percent annually to reflect increases in per capita income.<br />

The CTS estimates were derived by transportation mode, based on household<br />

characteristics (including trip frequency and household income) recorded in the<br />

household survey.<br />

(c) The improved level of service is forecast to generate additional demand in the Project<br />

Case compared to the Base Case. The benefits for these passengers have been estimated<br />

using the ‘rule of half’.<br />

(d) Some of these passengers will be diverted from other modes. Diversion from car has<br />

been neglected but 20 percent of the additional patronage has been assumed to come<br />

from bus. This reduction in bus patronage will enable service levels to be adjusted<br />

(assuming an average bus occupancy of 54 passengers/bus), leading to a reduction in bus<br />

86


operating costs. These were estimated in the BEST business plan at Rs.45.60 per km<br />

(2008 prices).<br />

(e) The reduction in bus operations will also contribute to reduced pollution and road<br />

congestion. While the <strong>Mumbai</strong> EMU services generate very limited pollutants locally,<br />

buses emit NO2 and SO2 at an estimated rate of 0.25 kg per bus hour. The direct benefit<br />

was estimated at Rs.175 per passenger per annum (2001 prices) in the MUTP-1 analysis;<br />

this has been updated to Rs.240 in 2008 prices. Indirect benefits from reduced pollution<br />

arise to the population living along the road corridor and are estimated at Rs.5.5 per ton<br />

per person (2008 prices). Road congestion benefits, estimated at Rs 0.05 per passengerkm,<br />

averaged over the day are negligible. Indeed, while based on <strong>Mumbai</strong> data, they are<br />

conservative compared to results obtained in Paris for instance. 62<br />

Result of Economic Analysis and Sensitivity Analysis:<br />

272. The benefits are calculated for the 35-year period following project completion,<br />

from 2010 to 2045 and the estimated EIRR derived and NPV calculated (using a discount rate of<br />

12 percent). The estimated NPV, discounted to 2010, is about US$262 million in 2008 prices<br />

with an EIRR of 17 percent. The distribution of benefits is shown in Table 3 and the forecast<br />

cash flows in Table 4.<br />

Table 3. Project Benefits (US$ million 2008, discounted at 12 percent to 2010)<br />

Total<br />

Capital expenditure -501<br />

Additional operating cost -1122<br />

Subtotal -1623<br />

User benefits<br />

Benefits to existing passengers<br />

Reduced crowding 952<br />

Reduced journey time 613<br />

Benefits to diverted passengers 80<br />

Subtotal. 1645<br />

Bus-related<br />

Reduced operating costs 178<br />

Pollution benefits 77<br />

Subtotal 255<br />

NPV 262<br />

62 Prud’homme, R. et al, Public Transport Congestion Costs: the Case of Paris Subway, Draft, 2010<br />

87


Table 4. MUTP-2A Forecast Economic Cash Flows<br />

(In crores of Rupees - Nominal)<br />

Year<br />

Capital<br />

Investment<br />

in MUTP-2A<br />

Incremental<br />

Operating<br />

Cost<br />

Comfort<br />

Journey<br />

time<br />

Bus<br />

VOC<br />

Direct<br />

pollution<br />

Indirect<br />

pollution<br />

Diverted<br />

passengers<br />

Economic<br />

Savings<br />

Replacement<br />

Cost of<br />

Assets<br />

Terminal<br />

Value of<br />

Assets<br />

2009-10 -117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -117<br />

2010-11 -284 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -284<br />

2011-12 -561 -38 47 77 4 0 2 0 131 -468<br />

2012-13 -1014 -296 253 160 40 1 16 7 477 -834<br />

2013-14 -1223 -704 459 260 121 3 49 37 929 -998<br />

2014-15 -662 -767 476 368 173 4 70 59 1151 -278<br />

2015-16 -823 533 393 164 4 66 61 1221 398<br />

2016-17 -889 583 423 171 4 69 67 1318 429<br />

2017-18 -938 740 470 116 3 47 52 1428 490<br />

2018-19 -1017 784 503 135 3 54 64 1543 526<br />

2019-20 -1096 861 538 138 3 55 69 1664 568<br />

2020-21 -1183 939 576 144 4 58 77 1798 615<br />

2021-22 -1183 967 594 148 4 60 79 1852 669<br />

2022-23 -1183 996 611 153 4 61 82 1908 724<br />

2023-24 -1183 1026 630 157 4 63 84 1965 782<br />

2024-25 -1183 1057 649 162 4 65 87 2024 840<br />

2025-26 -1183 1089 668 167 4 67 89 2084 901<br />

2026-27 -1183 1121 688 172 4 69 92 2147 964<br />

2027-28 -1183 1155 709 177 4 71 95 2211 1028<br />

2028-29 -1183 1190 730 182 5 73 98 2278 1094<br />

2029-30 -1183 1225 752 188 5 75 101 2346 1163<br />

2030-31 -1183 1262 775 193 5 78 104 2416 1233<br />

2031-32 -1183 1300 798 199 5 80 107 2489 1306<br />

2032-33 -1183 1339 822 205 5 82 110 2564 1380<br />

2033-34 -1183 1379 846 211 5 85 113 2640 1457<br />

2034-35 -1183 1421 872 218 5 87 117 2720 -90 1446<br />

2035-36 -1183 1463 898 224 6 90 120 2801 -180 1438<br />

2036-37 -1183 1507 925 231 6 93 124 2885 -414 1288<br />

2037-38 -1183 1552 953 238 6 96 128 2972 -864 925<br />

2038-39 -1183 1599 981 245 6 98 131 3061 -1127 751<br />

2039-40 -1183 1647 1011 252 6 101 135 3153 -657 1313<br />

2040-41 -1183 1696 1041 260 7 104 139 3247 2064<br />

2041-42 -1183 1747 1072 268 7 108 144 3345 2162<br />

2042-43 -1183 1799 1104 276 7 111 148 3445 2262<br />

2043-44 -1183 1853 1138 284 7 114 152 3549 2365<br />

2044-45 -1183 1909 1172 292 7 118 157 3655 2799 5271<br />

Net<br />

Benefits<br />

NPV -501 -1122 952 613 178 5 72 80 1899 -425 521 262<br />

ERR 17%<br />

88


273. The sensitivity of these results was tested against changes in seven base<br />

case assumptions:<br />

(a) an increase in investment costs of 20 percent;<br />

(b) including user benefits only<br />

(c) reducing the benefits by ten percent<br />

(d) evaluation period of 15 years<br />

(e) income growth of two percent p.a. instead of three percent p.a.<br />

(f) fares held constant in nominal terms i.e. a reduction in real terms of 7.4<br />

percent p.a.<br />

(g) delays of one, two or three years in the delivery of the trains.<br />

274. Switching values (that is the values which will cause the IERR to be<br />

below the discount rate) for the following variables were also included in the<br />

sensitivity analysis: construction costs, benefit reduction factor, income growth per<br />

year, incremental operating cost, journey time benefits, comfort benefits. They are<br />

presented in Table 5.<br />

Table 5. Switching Values for Key Project Variables<br />

Variable<br />

Switching value<br />

Construction costs<br />

152% of base case<br />

Benefit reduction factor -14% compared to base case<br />

Income growth per year 3.50% (base case is 5%)<br />

Incremental Operating Cost 123% of base case<br />

Comfort benefits<br />

73% of base case<br />

Journey time benefits<br />

57% of base case<br />

275. The results of the sensitivity analysis, given in Table 6, show the project<br />

is robust.<br />

Table 6. Sensitivity of Project Evaluation<br />

Test IRR (%) $ (million)<br />

1 Base 17 262<br />

2 Construction costs +20% 14 162<br />

3 User benefits only 12 7<br />

4 Benefits reduced by 10% 13 72<br />

5 Evaluation period of 20 years 14 62<br />

6 Income growth of 2% p.a. 8 -220<br />

7 Fares constant in nominal terms 25 864<br />

8 1 year delay in EMU procurement 17 259<br />

9 2 years delay in EMU procurement 17 253<br />

10 3 years delay in EMU procurement 17 245<br />

276. Table 6 indicates that benefits approximately triple if fares are held<br />

constant in nominal terms. This is caused by the increased patronage, in both the with<br />

and without-project cases (Table 7), and the resulting increase in benefits due to<br />

frequency and journey time savings as well as the significantly increased comfort<br />

benefits because of the greater relief provided by the project.<br />

89


Table 7. Forecast Number Of Passengers Originating<br />

With and Without Project (million)<br />

2008/9 2011/12 2015/16 2020/21<br />

Fares constant in real terms<br />

Without project 2,648 2,817 2,980 3,324<br />

With project 2,648 2,825 3,282 3,583<br />

Fares constant in nominal terms<br />

Without project 2,648 2,928 3,323 4,136<br />

With project 2,648 2,937 3,659 4,384<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban System Financial Performance and Impact on IR Finances<br />

277. Although the <strong>Mumbai</strong> system is one of the world’s major suburban<br />

railways, it is nevertheless a relatively small component of IR’s overall operations. In<br />

2008/9, the <strong>Mumbai</strong> system represented an estimated 12 percent of IR’s passenger<br />

traffic (measured in passenger-km) and about seven percent of IR’s total traffic task 63 .<br />

However, because of the very high average loads carried and the low average fare, it<br />

only generated about 1.5 percent of IR’s total revenue and about two percent of its<br />

total working expense (excluding depreciation). Because MUTP-2A will reduce<br />

overcrowding and thus require more assets and services to carry the same volume of<br />

traffic, its financial performance is expected to deteriorate for at least the mediumterm.<br />

However, its comparatively small share of the total IR business means that its<br />

financial performance has only a minor impact on the overall financial performance of<br />

IR as a whole, which is far more dependent on railway-wide tariff policies and<br />

continued strong growth in freight traffic.<br />

Projected Financial Performance of <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban System<br />

278. Using the operating and financial model described in the traffic forecast<br />

section, MRVC have undertaken financial projections of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban<br />

system over a 25-year period from 2008-09, which takes into account the impact of<br />

both the ongoing MUTP-1 (assumed to be completed in 2010-11) as well as MUTP-<br />

2A (assumed to be completed in 2014-15). A Base Case analysis has been undertaken<br />

as well as sensitivity analyses for the key assumptions.<br />

279. Depreciation charges were derived directly as the annual cost of<br />

replacing the fleet. An estimate of depreciation has been made using the results of a<br />

detailed analysis undertaken by consultants in 1996 which examined all renewable<br />

assets used by the suburban services (equivalent to about 15 percent of total cost). 64<br />

280. Table 8 and Figure 1 show that the deficit, excluding dividend<br />

payments to GOI and any depreciation related to infrastructure, will increase to<br />

around Rs 200 crore (Rs 2008), if fares increase in line with inflation or to around Rs<br />

1100 crore if fares remain at their current levels.<br />

63 As measured by traffic units, the sum of passenger-km and net tonne-km.<br />

64 This bears little or no relation to the ‘depreciation’ included in the IR accounts, which is primarily<br />

determined by the surplus available each year for reinvestment in assets and has been excluded from<br />

these projections. The depreciation allowance calculated by IR is not a true measure of depreciation but<br />

rather an allocation of the annual appropriation of surplus cash to a Depreciation Renewal Fund; it has<br />

no direct relation to asset values or lives.<br />

90


Figure 1. Financial Projections of <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban Services (Rs crores 2008)<br />

2,500<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

1,000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

Deficit (Constant nominal fares)<br />

Revenue (Constant real fares)<br />

Cost (excl dividend and infra depreciation)<br />

Deficit (Constant real fares)<br />

Revenue (Constant nominal fares fares)<br />

281. As highlighted in Table 8, the increase in the deficit is directly linked to<br />

the reduction in crowding. The average passengers per coach is expected to reduce by<br />

around 35 percent, from about 234 to about 155, as the additional fleet is introduced<br />

before beginning to increase again as demand increases. This increase in the fleet can<br />

be seen in the financial projections, with working expenses increasing from Rs 1,300<br />

crore to about Rs 1,900 crore as the additional vehicles are introduced.<br />

282. The estimated working ratios and operating ratios 65 to 2020/21 are<br />

given in Table 9 below. They assume fares rise in line with inflation and are given<br />

including and excluding the suburban fare surcharge. Without the project, the working<br />

ratios are below 100 percent and the Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s would be able to carry on in the<br />

short-term without financial support from third parties. If MUTP-2A is undertaken the<br />

Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s would be less able in the short term to generate profit if revenues<br />

decrease (the working ratio is consistently over 100 percent). In addition, if MUTP-<br />

2A is carried out, the suburban railway would be less able to recover operating costs<br />

on the long term without financial support and would not cover its long run variable<br />

costs because of low tariffs (the operating ratio is higher with MUTP-2A than<br />

without).<br />

65 The working ratio is the ratio of a company's total annual expenses (excluding depreciation and debtrelated<br />

expenses) to the annual gross income. The operating ratio is the ratio of the company's<br />

operating expenses (also excluding debt service charges) to operating revenues.<br />

91


283. In spite of this, the results for the <strong>Mumbai</strong> system even with MUTP-2A<br />

remain reasonable compared to suburban systems elsewhere in the world and<br />

significantly better than the results for the two other major IR suburban systems in<br />

Chennai and Kolkata.<br />

92


Table 8. <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban Services – Financial Projections Assuming MUTP-2A (Rs crores 2008/9)<br />

Assumptions<br />

1 Fares Fare rise in line with inflation from 09/10<br />

2 Fare surcharge For Phase I - As decided between IR,GOM and MOF<br />

For Phase II - Phase I Surcharge continues<br />

SUBURBAN OPERATING FORECAST STATEMENT (Rs crores Mar 08):<br />

2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21<br />

Revenue - Constant real fares<br />

1 Fare Revenue 1,165 1,127 1,093 1,114 1,147 1,184 1,216 1,313 1,381 1,403 1,437 1,469 1,502 1,536 1,570<br />

2 Other 44 51 55 59 64 69 75 81 87 94 102 110 119 128 139<br />

3 Total 1,209 1,178 1,148 1,173 1,212 1,253 1,291 1,394 1,468 1,497 1,539 1,579 1,621 1,664 1,709<br />

Revenue - Constant nominal fares<br />

1 Fare Revenue 1,165 1,127 1,093 1,114 1,086 1,055 1,019 1,039 1,029 986 952 918 886 854 824<br />

2 Other 44 51 55 59 64 69 75 81 87 94 102 110 119 128 139<br />

3 Total 1,209 1,178 1,148 1,173 1,150 1,124 1,094 1,120 1,117 1,080 1,054 1,028 1,005 983 963<br />

Expenditure (Excl. Depreciation) – Constant real fares<br />

1 Staff 722 749 808 820 824 834 946 1,104 1,104 1,100 1,098 1,096 1,093 1,091 1,089<br />

2 Materials 148 154 166 169 169 171 194 227 227 226 226 225 225 224 224<br />

3 Traction Energy 230 247 254 230 219 218 251 304 307 307 309 310 311 312 314<br />

4 Other 182 189 204 207 208 210 238 278 278 277 277 276 276 275 274<br />

5 Working Expenses 1,282 1,339 1,432 1,425 1,420 1,433 1,629 1,914 1,916 1,911 1,909 1,907 1,905 1,903 1,901<br />

Expenditure (Excl. Depreciation) – Constant nominal fares<br />

1 Staff 722 749 808 820 828 840 956 1,119 1,123 1,123 1,126 1,128 1,131 1,134 1,138<br />

2 Materials 148 154 166 169 170 173 196 230 231 231 231 232 232 233 234<br />

3 Traction Energy 230 247 254 230 220 220 254 308 311 313 316 318 321 324 327<br />

4 Other 182 189 204 207 209 212 241 282 283 283 284 284 285 286 287<br />

5 Working Expenses 1,282 1,339 1,432 1,425 1,427 1,445 1,647 1,939 1,949 1,951 1,957 1,963 1,969 1,977 1,985<br />

Deficit<br />

1 Constant real fares -73 -161 -284 -252 -209 -180 -339 -519 -448 -414 -370 -328 -284 -239 -193<br />

2 Constant nominal fares -73 -161 -284 -252 -277 -321 -553 -819 -832 -871 -902 -934 -965 -994 -1,022<br />

Passengers/Vehicle 234 226 213 214 212 211 178 155 163 166 170 174 178 182 186<br />

93


Table 9. <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban Services – Working and Operating Ratios with and without MUTP-2A<br />

2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21<br />

Without MUTP-2A<br />

Working ratio<br />

Incl surcharge 106% 115% 107% 106% 104% 98% 97% 95% 93% 92% 97% 95% 93% 90%<br />

Excl surcharge 114% 124% 121% 120% 116% 114% 111% 108% 105% 102% 97% 95% 93% 90%<br />

Operating ratio<br />

Incl surcharge 127% 138% 128% 127% 125% 118% 116% 114% 112% 110% 116% 114% 111% 108%<br />

Excl surcharge 136% 148% 146% 144% 139% 137% 133% 129% 126% 123% 116% 114% 111% 108%<br />

With MUTP-2A<br />

Working ratio<br />

Incl surcharge 109% 120% 115% 113% 111% 109% 107% 105% 103%<br />

Excl surcharge 126% 137% 130% 128% 124% 121% 117% 114% 111%<br />

Operating ratio<br />

Incl surcharge 131% 144% 138% 136% 134% 131% 129% 126% 123%<br />

Excl surcharge 152% 165% 157% 153% 149% 145% 141% 137% 134%<br />

94


Impact of <strong>Mumbai</strong> Services on IR Financial Performance<br />

284. Table 10 summarizes the estimated revenue and working expenses for key IR<br />

market segments for 2008/2009. This is based on the analyses of the costs of the freight and<br />

passenger services undertaken annually by IR, updated to the 2008/2009 control totals for<br />

revenue and expenditure.<br />

Table 10. Estimated IR Financial Results by Segment 2008/9<br />

Revenue Pass-km/ntk Yield Working expense (Rscr) Unit cost (Ps/tu)<br />

Rs cr (billion) (Ps/unit-km) Labour Non-labour Labour Non-labour<br />

Passengers 20193 571 35.3 10203 8008 17.9 14.0<br />

Other coaching 1964<br />

EMU - <strong>Mumbai</strong> 1250 85 14.8 548 430 6.5 5.1<br />

EMU – other 497 46 10.8 513 403 11.2 8.8<br />

Freight 53433 547 97.8 10317 8097 18.9 14.8<br />

Infrastructure 7706 887 6.2 0.7<br />

Corporate 2525 3666 1339 2.9 1.1<br />

Total WE 79862 1249 64.0 32952 19164 26.4 15.3<br />

(1) Excludes dividend and DRF contributions. Includes pensions (included in labour) and recurrent component of 6 th<br />

Pay Commission. Excludes arrears component of 6 th Pay Commission.<br />

285. The presentation of revenue and working expenses in Table 10 separately<br />

identifies train operation, infrastructure and general administration (‘corporate’) costs. It only<br />

covers working expenses, including pension costs but excluding contributions to DRF and also<br />

any share of the dividends payable to GOI. Thus revenue from the non-EMU passenger services<br />

(including other coaching) made an estimated surplus of Rs 3946 crore over its train operations<br />

costs as a contribution to infrastructure costs, corporate costs and depreciation. Freight, by<br />

contrast, contributed Rs 35,019 crore towards these same costs; it is cross-subsidizing passenger<br />

services, by about Rs 4-5,000 cr , but is also generating all the IR dividend and retained earnings<br />

required for capital projects.<br />

286. The EMU services in general, and the <strong>Mumbai</strong> EMU services in particular, are<br />

relatively small in comparison the IR operations as a whole, with the <strong>Mumbai</strong> services<br />

representing only around two percent of the total working expenses. As a result, the overall IR<br />

surplus is relatively immune to the performance of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> services unless some relatively<br />

extreme policy scenarios are assumed.<br />

95


Environmental Management Aspects<br />

Annex 10: Safeguard Policy Issues<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

287. Most of the components sub-urban rail infrastructure in <strong>Mumbai</strong> that MUTP-2A<br />

proposes to implement are likely to have environmentally beneficial outcomes as rail based mass<br />

transport is far less polluting than any other form of land-based transport. However, limited<br />

negative impacts are expected due to the removal of a few trees, and other important natural and<br />

cultural resources due to the provision of stabling lines and construction of electric substations<br />

for the traction. Most of the negative impacts are however confined to the implementation stage<br />

and can be mitigated with careful environmental management planning. Environmental and<br />

Social (E&S) safeguard frameworks for the project are in line with that approved by the <strong>Bank</strong> for<br />

MUTP-1. E&S risks are very minimal in view of nature and location of activities proposed under<br />

the project. Finally, MRVC has recently been certified to ISO 14001:2004 and ISO 18001:2007<br />

Environmental Management Approach and Instruments<br />

288. Since MUTP-2A builds on the activities initiated under MUTP-1, MRVC began<br />

the environmental assessment with a review of its on-going activities. Using the same<br />

consultants who have assisted in building capacity during MUTP-1, and are therefore familiar<br />

with the current situation and how it has evolved within MRVC and participating <strong>Railway</strong>s, the<br />

review has been supplemented with site visits to all identified candidate sites, and review of<br />

contract documents prepared in MUTP-1 as well as MUTP-2A. A review of the applicable<br />

policies of the GoI, GoM and local regulations of the municipalities, where the subprojects are<br />

proposed was also carried out. Following this, an Environmental Assessment (EA) has been<br />

undertaken with Environmental Management Plans being prepared for each component and<br />

modified to focus on issues specific to individual sites.<br />

289. Baseline assessment of the environmental status within a direct impact zone of<br />

one hundred meters radius of the project site was undertaken. The data collected during from<br />

these visits was analyzed in terms of the type and scale of impact of the project. Detailed field<br />

visit to most of the site location are undertaken to identify and analyze site specific issues based<br />

on following:<br />

(a) Floral and faunal ecological status<br />

(b) Air quality<br />

(c) Noise level<br />

(d) Water quality – Surface and Groundwater, Seawater intrusion status<br />

(e) Soil quality<br />

(f) Land use status<br />

(g) Traffic and transport network<br />

(h) Visual and aesthetic status<br />

(i) Sensitive receptors (such as schools, hospitals etc)<br />

(j) Status of Archaeological, Architectural, Historical, Religious and other such cultural<br />

properties<br />

96


(k) General social features<br />

(l) Hazardous waste handling and disposal<br />

290. Of the various components, the DC to AC conversion --which involves<br />

construction of traction substations, subsectioning and paralleling posts, and sectioning and<br />

paralleling posts-- construction of stabling lines and provision of maintenance facilities for<br />

EMUs were considered to be important from the environment point of view.<br />

291. The EA has been carried out with respect to various components namely land use,<br />

ecology, air quality, noise levels and severance. Depending upon the sub project, other relevant<br />

impact areas have also been considered.Apart from these, activities associated with the project<br />

during the preconstruction, construction and post construction stage are taken in to consideration<br />

to identify the impacts.<br />

Environmental Impacts and Management Measures<br />

292. Based on the overall understanding of the project and assessment of the site<br />

specific issues, ERM has formulated generic and specific Environmental Management Plan.<br />

293. Environmental Bill of Quantities: Based on the impacts identified from the<br />

assessment, the environmental bill of quantities (BoQ) have been estimated and have been<br />

incorporated into the EMP. If required these can be included in the contract for implementation<br />

by contractor/implementing agency.<br />

294. Stabling Lines Construction for Additional EMUs: This activity comprises laying<br />

of short lengths of track (about 300m for about 70 12-car trains) close to ten railway stations<br />

close to where trains terminate/originate. Key impacts include damage to/removal of trees within<br />

the proposed alignment for the stabling line. No other impacts are expected except during the<br />

construction phase when proper mitigation measures can substantially limit/eliminate adverse<br />

impacts. These temporary impacts include: air pollution from stored material and vehicle<br />

movement through congested areas, potential for pollution of water courses close to the<br />

alignments due to spillage of material, increased risk of accidents due to movement of heavy<br />

vehicles in inhabited areas close to the sites. The long term impacts cannot be completely<br />

avoided but would be minimized by careful selection of stabling line alignments, or mitigated by<br />

transplanting trees, identified as important, or compensatory plantation. Of the currently<br />

identified locations, most significant impacts are close to Bhayander staion (North) where the<br />

railway land has rows of trees and the termination point goes very close (~ 50m) to the south<br />

bank of the Bhayander creek where a few mangroves are located at the edge of the creek. While<br />

care would be taken during the construction and the EMP provides for limiting the extent of<br />

construction, accidental damage could result. In case of construction related impacts, the EMP<br />

includes provisions for ensuring that the vehicles used by contractors comply with the standards,<br />

are operated with proper safety considerations, etc. Facilities would be provided for laborers<br />

housed by the contractor and personal protective equipment would be compulsory for all site<br />

workers.<br />

295. Traction Substations and Sectioning Post Installation for DC/AC conversion:<br />

The key impacts pertain to the removal of or damage to trees, and in one/two cases (a very small<br />

97


number of) mangroves due to the project activities. Other impacts are mostly localized and<br />

temporary – pertaining mostly to the construction stage of the project. These include the<br />

deterioration of air quality due to gaseous pollutants and noise, increased risk of traffic accidents<br />

in crowded locations, potential for water quality degradation close to construction sites, handling<br />

of construction and demolition waste, including potential for hazardous waste such as in<br />

locations where older structures need to be dismantled – Chinchpokli, Sion, and Khopoli,<br />

hazardous conditions for on-site labour as well as passers-by given the urban setting for the<br />

activities. Management measures specified under the project include minimization of treecutting,<br />

provision of transplantation and if not possible, compensatory plantation as directed by<br />

the respective Tree Authority under each municipal body has been made for each site.<br />

Precautions are specified to avoid and minimize, if unavoidable, damage to (the very few)<br />

mangroves, close to stabling line extensions like Bhayander. For the construction phase,<br />

following the review of sample contract documents, contractors’ responsibilities are being<br />

specified to ensure that the agreed mitigation measures – limiting pollution from<br />

vehicles/equipment by complying with standards, provision of adequate facilities for housing,<br />

personal protective equipment, including those for preventing electric shocks, and health care for<br />

workers, safe storage of material and equipment, are integrated in appropriate places. In places<br />

locations where special care is required to be exercised, such as in the case of handling asbestos,<br />

the contracts specify the contractors’ responsibilities and methods for handling.<br />

296. Air Pollution Reduction: The conversion to AC from DC would result in about 30<br />

percent of energy savings per coach km traveled (specific energy consumption). Beneficial<br />

environmental impacts due to the project include avoided emissions of local and global air<br />

pollutants. The reduction in the consumption of energy due to use of state-of-the-art technologies<br />

such as regenerative braking, DC to AC conversion would reduce the emissions of particulates,<br />

SOx and NOx at source power plants, reducing local damage. In addition, reduction in specific<br />

energy would also be reduced. It is currently estimated that the approximately 285,000 MWh of<br />

energy saved annually by interventions under the project has the potential to reduce about<br />

228000 t CO2e of GHG emissions.<br />

Environmental Implementation Arrangements<br />

297. As the project components are spread over various authorities such as MRVC, CR<br />

and WR, the institutional setup will play an important role in implementation of the EMPs. Both<br />

MRVC and CR have agreed to hire services of Project Management Consultant (PMC) to<br />

implement activities under the project.<br />

298. MRVC has recently been certified to ISO 14001:2004 and ISO 18001:2007, with<br />

the EMPs developed under MUTP-2A forming the basis on which its performance will be<br />

measured. This certification will lead to streamlined environmental management across all of<br />

MRVC’s operations. The Management Representative required as per the ISO compliant system<br />

will be the Deputy Chief Engineer. S/he would supervise the PMC hired by MRVC and coordinate<br />

with the respective Chief Engineer of CR to confirm compliance with the relevant<br />

provisions of the EMP.<br />

299. The EMP will be implemented through the C.Rly/MRVC by incorporating the<br />

EMP requirements in the contractual agreement. For the contracts to be executed through the<br />

98


participating <strong>Railway</strong>s, it has been agreed that the contractor shall submit a report on compliance<br />

with the environmental mitigation measures (Environmental Compliance Reports, ECRs) before<br />

start of construction activities and periodically thereafter to Project In-charge. As per ISO<br />

14001, a suitable officer in MRVC will be assigned duty of visits to various sites and review of<br />

ECRs at sites and submit a report to <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />

Environmental Management Monitoring and Reporting<br />

300. Monitoring and Reporting would be carried out under the project using the<br />

arrangement developed under MUTP-1. The monitoring and reporting process for mitigation<br />

measures during construction will initiate from the contractor at the lowest rung who will report<br />

to the site engineers of MRVC/CR. CR would report regularly on environmental management<br />

through MRVC and through its Deputy Chief Engineer, MRVC’s own monitoring and reporting<br />

would cover periodic site visit and visual inspections for plantation, provision and use of<br />

personal protective equipment at site, provision of safety measures to avoid accidents, as well as<br />

pollution monitoring for ambient environmental quality – air and water, as appropriate. Bimonthly<br />

meetings under the aegis of the MRVC Deputy Chief Engineer are envisaged where the<br />

subproject specific environmental issues would be discussed at these meetings to be attended by<br />

project Engineers, PMC, and Contractor’s official responsible for environment, health and safety<br />

issues on site.<br />

Social Impacts and Management Measures<br />

301. A part of social impact assessment in the EA focused on identification and<br />

assessment of social impacts including land acquisition requirements and involuntary<br />

resettlement, if any, and likely impact on livelihoods, labor and human safety with a sentence on<br />

social impact assessment method and process. MUTP-2A has been designed in such a way that<br />

there will be no involvement of private land acquisition and Resettlement and Rehabilitation<br />

(R&R) of Project Affected Households (PAHs). MRVC has entered into an understanding with<br />

MMRDA, which will undertake R&R activities on behalf of MRVC as per the MUTP-1 R&R<br />

Policy. MRVC has experience in social safeguard management by way of coordinating LA and<br />

R&R activities for the rail component of the on-going MUTP-1. The expected social impacts of<br />

MUTP-2A are minimal and it will not require to establish a separate Social Unit for the social<br />

safeguard activities; however, MRVC will designate a senior officer in the PMU for monitor and<br />

coordinating social safeguard activities. MRVC will coordinate social safeguard activities with<br />

MMRDA for implementing mitigation measures, which it has the required capacity to manage.<br />

302. Resettlement and Rehabilitation of PAHs: A few railway employees earlier living<br />

at the proposed site at Thane have shifted away soon after the project was announced and some<br />

ten such railway employees living close to the proposed stabling lines site at Bhaindar North<br />

informed during EA that they will shift away before the commencement of the work. As railway<br />

staff, they will be provided with staff quarters or monthly house rent allowance enabling them to<br />

relocate away from this place. A supplementary social impact survey was carried out at the<br />

proposed site for stabling lines at the Virar Scrap yard to assess the nature and magnitude of<br />

impact on 38 structures located close to the railway tracks. The survey findings were as follows:<br />

(a) Out of 38 structures, 37 were residential structures and one was a temple; none will be<br />

99


impacted by the execution of the proposed stabling lines; however, (b) 13 of these structures<br />

located alongside tracks and occupied by railway employees and their families will need to be<br />

shifted away for safety reasons; they will be provided with staff quarters or receive monthly<br />

house rent allowance enabling them to relocate; (c) the other structures including a temple and<br />

residences for 18 squatter households and six tenants (in private houses) are beyond the<br />

execution zone and will not need to be relocated; (d) the execution areas and the railway tracks at<br />

this stretch will be barricaded for enhancing human safety. Some lands required for the project<br />

have been licensed out by the <strong>Railway</strong>s to its employees for vegetable cultivation in order to<br />

prevent encroachment. These licenses are issued on annual basis and will normally be allowed to<br />

run their course before the work commences. In cases where this is not possible, the licenses will<br />

be terminated with one month’s advance notice as per the license terms and conditions by the<br />

<strong>Railway</strong>s providing the licensees with sufficient time to harvest crops and salvage assets if any<br />

before such licenses come to an end.<br />

303. In order to deal with any future involuntary resettlement impacts due to any<br />

alteration in design or outlay, MRVC has prepared and adopted a Social Management<br />

Framework (SMF) which is detailed under the R&R Policy, which was adopted for the ongoing<br />

MUTP and is satisfactory to the <strong>Bank</strong>, setting forth the rules and procedures for carrying out any<br />

social, resettlement and rehabilitation activities under the Project, including identification,<br />

assessment and mitigation of potential environmental and social impacts arising from the Project,<br />

carrying out consultations, processing and redressing grievances, monitoring related impacts,<br />

and, if required, limited resettlement and rehabilitation action plans and other development and<br />

entitlement plans for people adversely affected as result of Project implementation. If<br />

resettlement is needed MRVC will prepare a specific resettlement action plan (RAP) based on<br />

the SMF and that is found to be acceptable and satisfactory to the <strong>Bank</strong><br />

304. The SMF referred to and outlined in the Chapter-3 of the Project Implementation<br />

Manual provides that any necessary resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) measures required<br />

due to any future alterations in design or layout will be carried out by MMRDA on behalf of<br />

MRVC as per the MUTP R&R Policy. If resettlement is needed MRVC will prepare a specific<br />

resettlement action plan (RAP) based on the SMF and that is found to be acceptable and<br />

satisfactory to the <strong>Bank</strong> This arrangement is a continuation of the arrangement established for<br />

implementing R&R measures for the rail component of MUTP. MRVC’s main task will be to<br />

coordinate efforts with MMRDA for carrying out the mitigation measures, for management of<br />

which it has the required capacity. MMRDA already has sufficient experience and capacity for<br />

handling the issues related to R&R for MUTP-2A.<br />

305. The project is to be executed entirely in urban area so there is no impact envisaged<br />

on Tribal community.<br />

306. Bid documents will include provisions to minimize social risks in order to prevent<br />

engagement of child labor, address human safety and hazard risk reduction, ensure equal wages,<br />

and social security measures under applicable labor laws.<br />

307. The safety and health hazards to the nearby community and sensitive receptors if<br />

any shall also be looked for. Mitigation majors shall be framed accordingly and included in the<br />

EMPs for individual projects if required.<br />

100


308. Land Acquisition: There is no land acquisition, and if there will be any in future,<br />

MRVC will carry out LA through the state government as per applicable procedures.<br />

309. Completion of R&R activities under on-going MUTP-1: The R&R activities for<br />

the <strong>Railway</strong> sub-projects of MUTP-1 have been substantially completed as per applicable norms<br />

set out in the loan agreement as confirmed by MRVC. About 196 land owners whose land was<br />

required for the construction of the Virar Car shed have received 80 percent advance<br />

compensation and the payment of the remaining 20 percent is under process by the GOM with<br />

MRVC funds.<br />

310. Gender and social inclusion: The IR has recently started taking remarkable steps<br />

to address gender and social inclusion aspects in its operations. Sensitivity to issues of<br />

involuntary resettlement is evident in the passing of the <strong>Railway</strong>s Amendment Act, 2008. It is<br />

one of the few such documents to confirm the application of the National Resettlement and<br />

Rehabilitation Policy, 2007. IR’s decision to introduce special passes for the HIV-affected,<br />

students, etc., and introduction of special local trains for women in peak hours are some other<br />

notable examples. In this context, the <strong>Bank</strong> in cooperation with MRVC will conduct a gender<br />

needs assessment in <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s urban transport system. It will help prepare a gender action plan,<br />

which could be piloted in the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban railways in future.<br />

Social Management Implementation, Monitoring and Reporting<br />

311. In case of any future alterations in project design requiring LA and R&R, day to<br />

day implementation and monitoring of social safeguard management will be done by MMRDA<br />

whereas MRVC will undertake regular stock taking and prepare status updates.<br />

312. MRVC will monitor the coordination of civil works with any necessary R&R<br />

activities undertaken by MMRDA in future. A single evaluation of social impact mitigation and<br />

value added activities will be undertaken at the end of the implementation for future learning,<br />

provided LA and R&R activities are undertaken as a result of design change.<br />

101


Annex 11: Project Preparation and Supervision<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

Planned<br />

Actual<br />

PCN review 05/14/2009 05/14/2009<br />

Initial PID to PIC 06/04/2009 06/03/2009<br />

Initial ISDS to PIC 06/08/2009 06/05/2009<br />

Appraisal 04/20/2010 02/08/2010<br />

Negotiations 05/07/2010 05/07/2010<br />

Board/RVP approval 06/29/2010<br />

Planned date of effectiveness 09/15/2010<br />

Planned date of mid-term review 02/28/2013<br />

Planned closing date 06/15/2015<br />

Key institutions responsible for preparation of the project:<br />

Government of India, <strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> <strong>Ltd</strong>.<br />

<strong>Bank</strong> staff and consultants who worked on the project included:<br />

Name Title Unit<br />

Hubert Nove-Josserand Team Leader/Sr. Urban Transport Spec. SASDT<br />

Atul Agarwal Transport Specialist SASDT<br />

Ramola Bhuyan Sr. Financial Mgmt. Spec. SARFM<br />

Satya N. Mishra Social Development Spec. SASDS<br />

Manmohan Singh Bajaj<br />

Abduljabbar H. Al Qathab<br />

Senior Procurement Specialist<br />

Senior Procurement Specialist<br />

SARPS<br />

SARPS<br />

Gaurav D. Joshi Environmental Specialist SASDI<br />

Vasile Olievschi Sr. <strong>Railway</strong> Specialist ECSS5<br />

Gennady Pilch<br />

David Freese<br />

Krishnan Srinivasan<br />

Sr. Counsel<br />

Sr. Finance Officer<br />

Consultant<br />

LEGES<br />

CTRFC<br />

SASDT<br />

Jitendra Sondhi Consultant SASDT<br />

Ed Dotson Consultant SASDT<br />

Alok Nath Bansal Consultant SASDT<br />

Richard G. Bullock Consultant SASDT<br />

Jorge M. Rebelo Lead Transport Spec./Peer Reviewer LCSTR<br />

John Scales Lead Transport Spec./Peer Reviewer EASCS<br />

Shomik Raj Mehndiratta Sr. Transport. Spec./Peer Reviewer EASCS<br />

Radia Benamghar Operations Analyst SASDT<br />

Natalya Stankevich Operations Analyst SASDT<br />

Gizella Díaz Program Assistant SASDO<br />

Ritu Sharma Program Assistant SASDO<br />

Bogdan Filip Popescu E T Temporary SASDT<br />

<strong>Bank</strong> funds expended to date on project preparation: The breakdown is as follows: (1) <strong>Bank</strong><br />

resources: US$407,900, (2) Trust funds: none, (3) Total: US$407,900.<br />

Estimated Approval and Supervision costs: The breakdown is as follows: (1) Remaining costs to<br />

approval: US$25,000, (2) Estimated annual supervision cost: US$200,000.<br />

102


Annex 12: <strong>Document</strong>s in the Project File<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

Client’s documents<br />

1. MoUD, “National Urban Transport Policy”, April 2006<br />

2. MMRDA, “Comprehensive Transportation Study (CTS) for <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region”,<br />

LEA International <strong>Ltd</strong>. in joint venture with LEA Associates South Asia Pvt. <strong>Ltd</strong>.,<br />

Consultant Draft Final Report, April 2008<br />

3. MRVC, “Social Management Framework for MUTP- 2A”, April 2010<br />

4. MRVC, “Draft Environmental Assessment Report and Environmental Management Plan”,<br />

Environmental Resources Management India (ERM), March 2010<br />

<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>’s documents<br />

5. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Policy Note: Towards A Discussion of Support to Urban Transport<br />

Development in India, March, 2005<br />

6. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>, Integrated Safeguard Data Sheet, April 2010<br />

7. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>, Project Information <strong>Document</strong> (PID) Appraisal Stage, March 2010<br />

103


Annex 13: Statement of Loans and Credits<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

Original Amount in US$ Millions<br />

Difference between<br />

expected and actual<br />

disbursements<br />

Project ID FY Purpose IBRD IDA SF GEF Cancel. Undisb. Orig. Frm.<br />

Rev’d<br />

P100735 2009 Orissa Community Tank<br />

Management Project<br />

56.00 56.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 104.96 -2.71 0.00<br />

P102331 2009 MPDPIP-II 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.26 0.00 0.00<br />

P100101 2009 Coal-Fired Generation<br />

180.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00<br />

Rehabilitation<br />

P093478 2009 Orissa Rural Livelihoods<br />

0.00 82.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.06 -0.47 0.00<br />

Project<br />

P096023 2009 Orissa State Roads 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 249.38 0.00 0.00<br />

P094360 2009 National VBD ControlandPolio 0.00 521.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 488.67 13.98 0.00<br />

Eradication<br />

P112033 2009 UP Sodic III 0.00 197.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 197.60 0.00 0.00<br />

P095114 2008 Rampur Hydropower Project 400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 318.30 9.30 0.00<br />

P105124 2008 HP DPL I 135.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.75 0.00 0.00<br />

P102737 2008 Bihar DPL 150.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 111.86 111.10 0.00<br />

P102547 2008 Elementary Education (SSA II) 0.00 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 354.45 2.47 0.00<br />

P101653 2008 Power System Development 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 602.32 -50.68 0.00<br />

Project IV<br />

P090585 2007 Punjab State Roads Project 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 143.81 -12.19 0.00<br />

P090768 2007 TN IAM WARM 335.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 428.73 104.56 0.00<br />

P090592 2007 Punjab Rural Water Supply and 0.00 154.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 142.37 81.77 0.00<br />

Sanitation<br />

P096019 2007 HP State Roads Project 220.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 195.63 24.58 0.00<br />

P083187 2007 Uttaranchal RWSS 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 111.87 49.60 0.00<br />

P090764 2007 Bihar Rural Livelihoods<br />

0.00 63.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.64 3.06 0.00<br />

Project<br />

P102768 2007 Stren India's Rural Credit 300.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 286.88 135.25 0.00<br />

Coops<br />

P071160 2007 Karnataka Health Systems 0.00 141.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 81.60 -13.09 0.00<br />

P100789 2007 AP Community Tank<br />

94.50 94.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 178.37 22.55 0.00<br />

Management Project<br />

P075060 2007 RCH II 0.00 360.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 204.28 42.95 0.00<br />

P075174 2007 AP DPL III 150.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.02 -77.33 0.00<br />

P078538 2007 Third National HIV/AIDS<br />

0.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 196.46 116.73 0.00<br />

Control Project<br />

P078539 2007 TB II 0.00 170.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 112.22 -13.22 0.00<br />

P099047 2007 Vocational Training India 0.00 280.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 218.34 -0.31 0.00<br />

P093720 2006 Mid-Himalayan (HP)<br />

0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.24 3.60 0.00<br />

Watersheds<br />

P079675 2006 Karn Municipal Reform 216.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 173.84 70.84 0.00<br />

P092735 2006 NAIP 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166.10 55.09 0.00<br />

P079708 2006 TN Empwr and Pov Reduction 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.21 30.25 0.00<br />

P078832 2006 Karnataka Panchayats<br />

0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.92 -33.18 0.00<br />

Strengthening Proj<br />

P083780 2006 TN Urban III 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 195.60 101.35 0.00<br />

104


P086414 2006 Power System Development 400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.86 -126.14 0.00<br />

Project III<br />

P094513 2005 India Tsunami ERC 0.00 465.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 391.28 387.96 0.00<br />

P073370 2005 Madhya Pradesh Water Sector 394.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 304.11 224.36 0.00<br />

Restructurin<br />

P073651 2005 DISEASE SURVEILLANCE 0.00 68.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.43 44.49 0.00<br />

P075058 2005 TN HEALTH SYSTEMS 0.00 110.83 0.00 0.00 20.06 38.88 48.13 22.23<br />

P077856 2005 Lucknow-Muzaffarpur National 620.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 237.18 87.18 0.00<br />

Highway<br />

P077977 2005 Rural Roads Project 99.50 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 107.69 69.21 0.00<br />

P086518 2005 SME Financing and<br />

520.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00<br />

Development<br />

P084792 2005 Assam Agric Competitiveness 0.00 154.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91.83 68.88 -0.00<br />

P084790 2005 MAHAR WSIP 325.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 228.41 129.41 0.00<br />

P084632 2005 Hydrology II 104.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 84.26 71.71 42.45<br />

P078550 2004 Uttar Wtrshed 0.00 69.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.95 2.47 0.00<br />

P050655 2004 RAJASTHAN HEALTH<br />

0.00 89.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.26 32.58 0.00<br />

SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT<br />

P076467 2003 Chatt DRPP 0.00 112.56 0.00 0.00 20.06 50.28 57.05 0.00<br />

P073094 2003 AP Comm Forest Mgmt 0.00 108.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.62 0.16 0.00<br />

P071272 2003 AP RURAL POV<br />

0.00 215.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.19 -58.48 0.00<br />

REDUCTION<br />

P050649 2003 TN ROADS 348.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.97 61.97 0.00<br />

P067606 2003 UP ROADS 488.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93.47 93.47 0.00<br />

P050647 2002 UP WSRP 0.00 149.20 0.00 0.00 40.11 73.38 85.16 0.00<br />

P050653 2002 KARNATAKA RWSS II 0.00 151.60 0.00 0.00 15.04 16.33 3.95 0.00<br />

P050668 2002 MUMBAI URBAN<br />

463.00 79.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 255.19 243.09 112.09<br />

TRANSPORT PROJECT<br />

P040610 2002 RAJ WSRP 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 25.84 41.20 28.74 0.00<br />

P069889 2002 MIZORAM ROADS 0.00 78.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.43 -13.12 0.00<br />

P071033 2002 KARN Tank Mgmt 32.00 130.90 0.00 0.00 25.07 110.97 51.19 -5.69<br />

P072539 2002 KERALA STATE<br />

255.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93.42 93.42 0.00<br />

TRANSPORT<br />

Total: 8,086.00 6,775.47 0.00 0.00 146.18 8,945.33 2,462.69 171.08<br />

INDIA<br />

STATEMENT OF IFC’s<br />

Held and Disbursed Portfolio<br />

In Millions of US Dollars<br />

Committed<br />

Disbursed<br />

IFC<br />

IFC<br />

FY Approval Company Loan Equity Quasi Partic. Loan Equity Quasi Partic.<br />

2005 ADPCL 39.50 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 AHEL 0.00 5.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.08 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 AP Paper Mills 35.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 5.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 APIDC Biotech 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.00 0.00<br />

2002 ATL 13.81 0.00 0.00 9.36 13.81 0.00 0.00 9.36<br />

2003 ATL 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 ATL 9.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

105


2006 Atul <strong>Ltd</strong> 16.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2003 BHF 10.30 0.00 10.30 0.00 10.30 0.00 10.30 0.00<br />

2004 BILT 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00<br />

2001 BTVL 0.43 3.98 0.00 0.00 0.43 3.98 0.00 0.00<br />

2003 Balrampur 10.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.52 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2001 Basix <strong>Ltd</strong>. 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 Bharat Biotech 0.00 0.00 4.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.30 0.00<br />

1984 Bihar Sponge 5.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.70 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2003 CCIL 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 CCIL 7.00 2.00 0.00 12.40 7.00 2.00 0.00 12.40<br />

1990 CESC 4.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.61 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

1992 CESC 6.55 0.00 0.00 14.59 6.55 0.00 0.00 14.59<br />

2004 CGL 14.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.38 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2004 CMScomputers 0.00 10.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2002 COSMO 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 COSMO 0.00 3.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.73 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 Chennai Water 24.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2003 DQEL 0.00 1.50 1.50 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 0.00<br />

2005 DSCL 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 DSCL 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 Dabur 0.00 14.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.09 0.00 0.00<br />

2003 Dewan 8.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.68 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 Federal <strong>Bank</strong> 0.00 28.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.99 0.00 0.00<br />

2001 GTF Fact 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 GTF Fact 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00<br />

1994 GVK 0.00 4.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.83 0.00 0.00<br />

2003 HDFC 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00<br />

1998 IAAF 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 IAL 0.00 9.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.70 0.00 0.00<br />

1998 IDFC 0.00 10.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.82 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 IDFC 50.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 100.00<br />

IHDC 6.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 IHDC 7.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 Indecomm 0.00 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.57 0.00 0.00<br />

1996 India Direct Fnd 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00<br />

2001 Indian Seamless 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 JK Paper 15.00 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.38 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 K Mahindra INDIA 22.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 KPIT 11.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 8.00 2.50 0.00 0.00<br />

2003 LandT 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 LGB 14.21 4.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.82 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 Lok Fund 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2002 MMFSL 7.89 0.00 7.51 0.00 7.89 0.00 7.51 0.00<br />

2003 MSSL 0.00 2.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.20 0.00 0.00<br />

2001 MahInfra 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.00<br />

Montalvo 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 0.00 0.00<br />

1996 Moser Baer 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00<br />

1999 Moser Baer 0.00 8.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.74 0.00 0.00<br />

2000 Moser Baer 12.75 10.54 0.00 0.00 12.75 10.54 0.00 0.00<br />

106


Nevis 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2003 NewPath 0.00 9.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.31 0.00 0.00<br />

2004 NewPath 0.00 2.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00<br />

2003 Niko Resources 24.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.44 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2001 Orchid 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00<br />

1997 Owens Corning 5.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.92 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 PSL Limited 15.00 4.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.54 0.00 0.00<br />

2004 Powerlinks 72.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.16 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2004 RAK India 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

1995 Rain Calcining 0.00 2.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.29 0.00 0.00<br />

2004 Rain Calcining 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 Ramky 3.74 10.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 Ruchi Soya 0.00 9.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.77 0.00 0.00<br />

2001 SBI 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

1997 SREI 3.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.21 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2000 SREI 6.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.50 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

1995 Sara Fund 0.00 3.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.43 0.00 0.00<br />

2004 SeaLion 4.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.40 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2001 Spryance 0.00 1.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.86 0.00 0.00<br />

2003 Spryance 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.00<br />

2004 Sundaram Finance 42.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.93 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2000 Sundaram Home 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.00<br />

2002 Sundaram Home 6.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.71 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

1998 TCW/ICICI 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 TISCO 100.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2004 UPL 15.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.45 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

1996 United Riceland 5.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.63 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 United Riceland 8.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2002 Usha Martin 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00<br />

2001 Vysya <strong>Bank</strong> 0.00 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.66 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 Vysya <strong>Bank</strong> 0.00 3.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.51 0.00 0.00<br />

1997 WIV 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00<br />

1997 Walden-Mgt India 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 iLabs Fund II 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

Total portfolio: 956.52 249.41 42.30 536.35 604.74 175.91 38.60 236.35<br />

Approvals Pending Commitment<br />

FY Approval Company Loan Equity Quasi Partic.<br />

2004 CGL 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2000 APCL 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 Atul <strong>Ltd</strong> 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00<br />

2001 Vysya <strong>Bank</strong> 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2006 Federal <strong>Bank</strong> 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2001 GI Wind Farms 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2004 Ocean Sparkle 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

2005 Allain Duhangan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />

Total pending commitment: 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00<br />

107


Annex 14: Country at a Glance<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

108


109


Annex 15: Maps<br />

INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />

110


To Palghar<br />

VAITARNA<br />

INDIA<br />

MUMBAI URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT IIA<br />

Rail Components<br />

Virar Northwest 3<br />

6<br />

Virar Northeast<br />

MUTP IIA RAIL PROJECT COMPONENTS:<br />

COMPONENT 1<br />

PROCUREMENT OF 72 NEW TECHNOLOGY EMU TRAINS<br />

COMPONENT 2<br />

MUTP I RAIL PROJECT COMPONENTS:<br />

TRACTION SUBSTATIONS<br />

RAIL (5TH LINE)<br />

RAIL (PAIR OF LINES)<br />

16<br />

Virar Cutting Yard<br />

VIRAR<br />

6<br />

DC TO AC CONVERSION (INCLUDING<br />

SIGNAL AND TELECOM IMPROVEMENTS)<br />

NON-BANK FUNDED TRACTION SUBSTATIONS<br />

BANK FUNDED TRACTION SUBSTATIONS<br />

COMPONENT 3<br />

EMU LOCATION AND NUMBER OF STABLING LINES<br />

AT THE LOCATION<br />

EXISTING:<br />

RAILWAY STATIONS<br />

MAIN ROADS<br />

ROAD UNDER CONSTRUCTION<br />

LOCAL ROADS<br />

RAILROADS<br />

METRO LINE 1<br />

M<br />

METRO STATIONS ON LINE 1<br />

Vasai Road Southwest 2<br />

VASAI ROAD<br />

To Kasara Station,<br />

3 stabling lines,<br />

xx km from <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST<br />

<strong>Mumbai</strong><br />

1<br />

Titwala<br />

Manori Creek<br />

Borivali Northwest 4<br />

Borivali Southwest<br />

3<br />

Malad Creek<br />

M<br />

M<br />

M<br />

MAHIM - BETWEEN LINE BORIVALI<br />

5TH<br />

GOREGAON<br />

Oshiwara<br />

JOGESHWARI<br />

BORIVALI - PAIR VIRAR OF LINES<br />

ADDITIONAL<br />

WESTERN EXPRESSWAY<br />

BORIVALI<br />

MALAD<br />

EAST<br />

EASTERN EXPRESSWAY<br />

LINES<br />

- OF T KURLA HANE PAIR ADDITION A L<br />

THANE<br />

Thane<br />

DIVA<br />

12<br />

Thakurli<br />

KALYAN<br />

1<br />

Ambarnath<br />

To Karjat Station,<br />

2 stabling lines,<br />

99 km from <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST<br />

to Khopoli Station,<br />

5 stabling lines,<br />

xx km from <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST<br />

ANDHERI<br />

M<br />

M<br />

M<br />

M<br />

NAVI<br />

MUMBAI<br />

ARABIAN<br />

SEA<br />

SANTA CRUZ<br />

SAKINAKA<br />

M M<br />

MM<br />

M<br />

M<br />

M<br />

Thane Creek<br />

0 5<br />

KILOMETERS<br />

BANDRA<br />

Bandra<br />

Kurla<br />

Sion<br />

4<br />

Sion<br />

4<br />

CHEMBUR<br />

MANKHURD<br />

HARBOUR LINE<br />

MAHIM<br />

Mahim<br />

Bay<br />

DADAR<br />

SATIS<br />

WESTERN RAILWAY<br />

Wadala<br />

Road<br />

Belapur<br />

4<br />

Chinchpokli<br />

Mahalaxmi<br />

CENTRAL RAILWAY<br />

Panvel Creek<br />

3<br />

Panvel<br />

ATC<br />

PILOT<br />

PROJECT<br />

CHURCHGATE<br />

CST<br />

MUMBAI<br />

SHEVA<br />

JANUARY 2010<br />

URAN<br />

This map was produced by the<br />

Map Design Unit of The <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />

The boundaries, colors, denominations<br />

and any other information shown on<br />

this map do not imply, on the part of<br />

The <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Group, any judgment<br />

on the legal status of any territory, or<br />

any endorsement or acceptance of<br />

such boundaries.<br />

To Karjat Station,<br />

2 stabling lines,<br />

99 km from <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST<br />

IBRD 37317

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!