World Bank Document - Mumbai Railway Vikas Corporation Ltd ...
World Bank Document - Mumbai Railway Vikas Corporation Ltd ...
World Bank Document - Mumbai Railway Vikas Corporation Ltd ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Public Disclosure Authorized<br />
<strong>Document</strong> of<br />
The <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong><br />
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY<br />
Report No: 54171-IN<br />
Public Disclosure Authorized<br />
Public Disclosure Authorized<br />
PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT<br />
ON A<br />
PROPOSED LOAN<br />
IN THE AMOUNT OF US$430 MILLION<br />
TO THE<br />
REPUBLIC OF INDIA<br />
FOR A<br />
MUMBAI URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT – 2A<br />
June 2, 2010<br />
Public Disclosure Authorized<br />
Sustainable Development Unit<br />
India Country Management Unit<br />
South Asia Region<br />
This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the<br />
performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without <strong>World</strong><br />
<strong>Bank</strong> authorization.
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS<br />
(Exchange Rate Effective April 30, 2010)<br />
Currency Unit = Indian Rupees<br />
Rs. 44.42 = $1.0<br />
FISCAL YEAR<br />
April 1 – March 31<br />
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS<br />
AC Alternating Current KV Kilovolt<br />
ACA Additional Central Assistance m/s/s meters per second per second<br />
ASCI Administrative Staff College of India MAA Memorandum and Articles of Association<br />
CAG Comptroller and Auditor General MMR <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region<br />
CGFA<br />
Corporate Governance and Financial<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region Development<br />
MMRDA<br />
Accountability<br />
Authority<br />
CPSU Central Public Sector Undertaking MOF Ministry of Finance<br />
CR Central <strong>Railway</strong> MOR Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />
CST Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus <strong>Mumbai</strong> MOU Memorandum of Understanding<br />
DC Direct Current MPC Metropolitan Planning Committee<br />
DPE Department of Public Enterprises MRVC <strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong><br />
EA Environment Assessment MUTP <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project<br />
EMP Environmental Management Plan MUTP-2A <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project - 2A<br />
EMU Electric Multiple Unit NCB National Competitive Bidding<br />
FA&CAO Financial Advisor and Chief Account Officer PAD Project Appraisal <strong>Document</strong><br />
FM Financial Management PDO Project Development Objective<br />
GAAP Governance and Accountability Plan PIO Public Information Officer<br />
GHG Greenhouse Gas R&R Resettlement and Rehabilitation<br />
GOI Government of India RAP Resettlement Action Plan<br />
GOM Government of Maharashtra RDSO Research Design and Standards Organization<br />
GPS Global Positioning System RSPM Respirable Particulate Matter<br />
HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus RTI Right to Information Act<br />
ICB International Competitive Bidding SAO Senior Accounts Officer<br />
ICF Integral Coach Factory SBDs Standard Bidding <strong>Document</strong>s<br />
IGBT Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor SMF Social Management Framework<br />
IR Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s tCO2e Ton CO 2 equivalent<br />
ISO International Org for Standardization TSS Traction Sub-Stations<br />
IT Information Technology WR Western <strong>Railway</strong><br />
IUFRs Interim Unaudited Financial Report<br />
Vice President: Isabel M. Guerrero<br />
Country Director: N. Roberto Zagha<br />
Sector Manager: Michel Audigé<br />
Task Team Leader: Hubert Nove-Josserand<br />
ii
INDIA<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
CONTENTS<br />
Page<br />
I. STRATEGIC CONTEXT AND RATIONALE ................................................................. 1<br />
A. Country and Sector Issues ................................................................................................... 1<br />
B. Rationale for <strong>Bank</strong> involvement ......................................................................................... 2<br />
C. Higher-Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes ................................................ 3<br />
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 3<br />
A. Lending Instrument ............................................................................................................. 3<br />
B. Project Development Objective and Key Indicators ........................................................... 3<br />
C. Project Components ............................................................................................................ 4<br />
D. Alternatives Considered and Reasons for Rejection ........................................................... 7<br />
III. IMPLEMENTATION ...................................................................................................... 8<br />
A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements ................................................................ 8<br />
B. Monitoring and Evaluation of Outcomes/Results ............................................................... 9<br />
C. Sustainability....................................................................................................................... 9<br />
D. Critical Risks and Possible Controversial Aspects ........................................................... 10<br />
E. Loan conditions and covenants ......................................................................................... 11<br />
IV. APPRAISAL SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 12<br />
A. Economic and financial analyses ...................................................................................... 12<br />
B. Technical ........................................................................................................................... 13<br />
C. Fiduciary ........................................................................................................................... 13<br />
D. Social................................................................................................................................. 15<br />
E. Environment ...................................................................................................................... 16<br />
F. Safeguard policies ............................................................................................................. 17<br />
G. Policy Exceptions and Readiness...................................................................................... 18<br />
Annex 1: Country and Sector or Program Background ......................................................... 19<br />
Annex 2: Major Related Projects Financed by the <strong>Bank</strong> and/or other Agencies ................. 31<br />
iii
Annex 3: Results Framework and Monitoring ........................................................................ 33<br />
Annex 4: Detailed Project Description ...................................................................................... 36<br />
Annex 5: Project Costs ............................................................................................................... 42<br />
Annex 6: Implementation Arrangements ................................................................................. 44<br />
Annex 6A: Governance and Accountability Action Plan (GAAP)......................................... 49<br />
Annex 6 B: Supervision Strategy Matrix .................................................................................. 57<br />
Annex 7: Financial Management and Disbursement Arrangements ..................................... 59<br />
Annex 8: Procurement Arrangements ...................................................................................... 75<br />
Annex 9: Economic and Financial Analysis ............................................................................. 84<br />
Annex 10: Safeguard Policy Issues ............................................................................................ 96<br />
Annex 11: Project Preparation and Supervision ................................................................... 102<br />
Annex 12: <strong>Document</strong>s in the Project File ............................................................................... 103<br />
Annex 13: Statement of Loans and Credits ............................................................................ 104<br />
Annex 14: Country at a Glance ............................................................................................... 108<br />
Annex 15: Maps......................................................................................................................... 110<br />
iv
INDIA<br />
MUMBAI URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT - 2A<br />
PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT<br />
SOUTH ASIA<br />
SASDT<br />
Date: June 2, 1010<br />
Country Director: Roberto Zagha<br />
Sector Manager/Director: Michel Audigé<br />
Project ID: P113028<br />
Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan<br />
Team Leader: Hubert Nove-Josserand<br />
Sectors: <strong>Railway</strong>s (100%)<br />
Themes: Other urban development (100%)<br />
Environmental category: Partial Assessment<br />
Project Financing Data<br />
[X] Loan [ ] Credit [ ] Grant [ ] Guarantee [ ] Other:<br />
For Loans/Credits/Others: None<br />
Total <strong>Bank</strong> financing (US$m.): 430.00<br />
Proposed terms: Standard IBRD terms with a maturity of 30 years and a grace period of five<br />
years.<br />
Financing Plan (US$m)<br />
Source Local Foreign Total<br />
Borrower 540.50 0.00 540.50<br />
International <strong>Bank</strong> for Reconstruction and 276.20 153.80 430.00<br />
Development<br />
Financing Gap 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Total: 816.70 153.80 970.50<br />
Borrower:<br />
Republic of India<br />
India<br />
Responsible Agency:<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> Limited<br />
2nd Floor, Churchgate Station Building<br />
Churchgate, <strong>Mumbai</strong>, India 400 020<br />
Tel: (91-22) 2208-0015 Fax: (91-22) 2209-6972<br />
md@mrvc.gov.in, commrvc@vsnl.net<br />
v
Estimated disbursements (<strong>Bank</strong> FY/US$m)<br />
FY 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015<br />
Annual 3 19 74 130 127 77<br />
Cumulative 3 22 96 226 353 430<br />
Project implementation period: Start January 31, 2010 End: June 15, 2015<br />
Expected effectiveness date: September 15, 2010<br />
Expected closing date: June 15, 2015<br />
Does the project depart from the CAS in content or other significant respects<br />
Ref. PAD I.C.<br />
Does the project require any exceptions from <strong>Bank</strong> policies<br />
Ref. PAD IV.G.<br />
Have these been approved by <strong>Bank</strong> management<br />
Is approval for any policy exception sought from the Board<br />
Does the project include any critical risks rated “substantial” or “high”<br />
Ref. PAD III.E.<br />
Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for implementation<br />
Ref. PAD IV.G.<br />
[ ]Yes [X ] No<br />
[ ]Yes [X] No<br />
[ ]Yes [ ] No<br />
[ ]Yes [X] No<br />
[ ]Yes [X] No<br />
[ X ]Yes [ ] No<br />
Project development objective Ref. PAD II.C., Technical Annex 3<br />
To improve the passenger carrying capacity, operational efficiency, level of comfort of, and the<br />
institutional capacity of entities involved in, the suburban rail system of <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan<br />
area.<br />
Project description Ref. PAD II.D., Technical Annex 4<br />
Component 1: Rolling stock fleet increase with procurement of 864 EMU cars.<br />
Component 2: Conversion of electric traction system from 1500V DC to 25kV AC on the<br />
Central <strong>Railway</strong>, with signal and telecom system improvements.<br />
Component 3: Maintenance facilities and stabling lines to accommodate the additional trains.<br />
Component 4: Capacity Strengthening and Technical assistance.<br />
Which safeguard policies are triggered, if any Ref. PAD IV.F., Technical Annex 10<br />
Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01)<br />
Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12)<br />
Significant, non-standard conditions, if any, for:<br />
Ref. PAD III.F.<br />
Loan/credit effectiveness:<br />
The Additional Conditions of Effectiveness consist of the following: the SFA and the MOU with<br />
the ICF have been executed.<br />
vi
I. STRATEGIC CONTEXT AND RATIONALE<br />
A. Country and Sector Issues<br />
1. India is on a high economic growth path. Its urban population has also been<br />
increasing, faster than its total population, and urbanization in India is projected to reach 41<br />
percent by 2030. Infrastructure development in most Indian cities is insufficient and is not<br />
keeping pace with the increase in travel demand. As a direct consequence, congestion on roads<br />
increases travel time as speeds decrease. Meeting the demand is also a challenge for the railways<br />
across the country. The <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region (MMR) is one of the world’s largest cities,<br />
with a population of 18 million as per the 2001 census. Within the next 25 years, the MMR is<br />
projected to overtake Tokyo to become the largest city in the world, in a country having one of<br />
the fastest growing economies. <strong>Mumbai</strong>, as India’s financial and commercial capital and its most<br />
prominent gateway to the country, occupies the top position in terms of its contribution to the all-<br />
India GDP.<br />
2. The region faces enormous challenges, one of which is the acute inadequacy of its<br />
transport infrastructure. The suburban rail system is the lifeline of <strong>Mumbai</strong>, carrying more than<br />
half of all motorized trips. In 2007-08 an estimated 6.8 million passengers daily (2.5 billion trips<br />
annually) travelled on the suburban railway. At peak hour the average frequency for train<br />
services was a very reasonable 16 trains per hour. Because of its extensive reach across the<br />
metropolitan region and its intensive use by the local population, commuters are subjected to one<br />
of the most severe overcrowding conditions in the world, with a density of up to 16 people per<br />
square meter in the coaches. In addition to overcrowding in the trains, trespassing on the rail<br />
lines is a major cause of accidents, many of them fatal. Death of squatters and trespassers being<br />
struck by a train and passengers falling off trains are a daily occurrence, with 10-12 fatalities per<br />
day. Furthermore, the rapid pace of urbanization and probable acceleration of car ownership and<br />
use in <strong>Mumbai</strong> present a threat to ambient air quality, already a major health issue in most Indian<br />
cities. In <strong>Mumbai</strong> the main contributor to air pollution is the transport sector, so developing<br />
suburban rail use contributes to the efforts being made, in India as well as in other countries, to<br />
reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The present traffic condition of rail commuters is<br />
incompatible with the objectives of <strong>Mumbai</strong> to become a world-class city with acceptable levels<br />
of comfort, convenience, safety and air quality.<br />
3. In early 2000, the Government of Maharashtra state (GOM) and Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />
(IR) launched preparation of the first <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project (MUTP-1) 1 , which has<br />
been implemented since 2002 with the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>’s help and is still under way. By March<br />
2010, 84 new twelve-car electric multiple units (EMU) trains had been put into service, 51 of<br />
which were financed from the <strong>Bank</strong> loan and 33 were financed internally by IR. (Previously<br />
rakes were all of nine cars.) This has reduced crowding in the system from 500 people per coach<br />
ppdpk (persons in peak direction at peak) to 450, despite a net increase in passengers. It is<br />
expected that once all additional 72 twelve-car rakes financed under that project are in service,<br />
crowding will be further reduced to 350 ppdpk, i.e. 30 percent less than the original density --but<br />
still twice the rated carrying capacity.<br />
1 The on-going <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project, usually referred to as MUTP, is referred to in this document as<br />
MUTP-1 to distinguish it from the Second Project.<br />
1
4. As demand continues to grow, yet more capacity will be needed. A comprehensive<br />
transport study for the <strong>Mumbai</strong> region, called TranSforM, carried out under MUTP-1,<br />
recommended this as a priority, in recognition of suburban rail’s dominant role in the region’s<br />
transport network. Suburban rail’s importance is reflected in the size of the planned investment –<br />
Rs.315 billion ($7 billion) by 2031, the Region’s second largest investment after the metro.<br />
5. The proposed <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A (known and referred to in this<br />
document as MUTP-2A) is part of this priority program for developing suburban rail. It will be<br />
complemented by another domestically-funded project known as MUTP-2B, already approved<br />
by the Government of India (GOI) and also part of the priority program, which will further<br />
increase the transport capacity of the suburban rail system by adding tracks. MUTP-2B requires<br />
land acquisition and its implementation will take longer than MUTP-2A.<br />
B. Rationale for <strong>Bank</strong> involvement<br />
6. In continuation of MUTP-1, the proposed increase in suburban rail capacity will<br />
bring important local benefits, reducing commuting times and increasing comfort for a large<br />
segment of <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s population, especially among its poor. The project will allow more<br />
frequent services, cutting waiting time, while higher maximum speeds will cut trip time. The low<br />
fare policy of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail system makes this mode of transport cheaper than the<br />
bus and particularly attractive to less affluent commuters.<br />
7. As part of this second project, traction voltage will be upped from 1,500 V DC to<br />
25 KV AC, reducing energy losses in distribution. The improved rolling stock supplied under<br />
MUTP-2A will further reduce energy consumption, cutting it over all by about 30 percent<br />
compared to the present system. This in turn will contribute to mitigating the climate change<br />
threat originating from transport.<br />
8. This second project will also continue the capacity building effort started by the<br />
<strong>Bank</strong> team during first project. Throughout the implementation of MUTP-1 the project<br />
implementation company, <strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> (MRVC) has gained requisite<br />
expertise in managing a challenging suburban rail development project that required professional<br />
expertise in technical disciplines, as well as in interagency coordination and communication.<br />
This follow-on project will help MRVC in furthering its professional competency and assist it to<br />
plan and design more complex projects involving multi-modal stations.<br />
9. Building on the progress made under MUTP-1, the zonal railways, Central<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> (CR) and Western <strong>Railway</strong> (WR), want to address remaining challenges, in particular to<br />
reduce the high number of fatalities related to trespassing and to improve the environmental<br />
management side of their operation. The successful partnership between GOM and IR for the<br />
development of suburban rail services in the <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region has been recognized<br />
by the railways. In its Vision 2020 strategic plan the Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s wishes to develop this<br />
type of partnership for suburban rail services across the country and make the management of<br />
suburban operations more efficient. This will include addressing the issue of the growing<br />
financial deficits of such services. Through specific studies as well as study tours, this MUTP-2A<br />
project will help develop the analytical knowledge basis to address these challenges and set up<br />
these organizational changes.<br />
2
C. Higher-Level Objectives to which the Project Contributes<br />
10. The proposed project is designed to support the Long-term Transportation Strategy for<br />
the <strong>Mumbai</strong> metropolitan region (TranSforM), whose vision is “Transforming <strong>Mumbai</strong> into a<br />
world class metropolis with a vibrant economy and globally comparable quality of life for its<br />
citizens”. In addition, the project supports IR’s Vision 2020, which aims to remove bottlenecks<br />
and augment capacity to match the growing transportation demand and provide comfort and<br />
convenience in every activity.<br />
11. The project supports the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>’s Country Strategy for India (FY2009-12), which<br />
emphasizes rapid and inclusive growth, sustainable development, and improving government’s<br />
effectiveness in delivering services. Continuation of the <strong>Bank</strong>’s involvement in India’s suburban<br />
sector through MUTP-2A, with its mix of growth-oriented investments and capacity building,<br />
will help India to develop a collaborative approach between the local governments and IR,<br />
towards a more efficient suburban railway system, as befits a middle- income state.<br />
12. The <strong>Bank</strong> is engaged in consultations with IR for developing a longer-term Plan 2030<br />
that would address the challenges that the <strong>Railway</strong>s face. These derive from India’s expected<br />
continued rapid economic growth over the next two decades, the expected changes in the<br />
expectation of customers, and the continuing transition to urban life. In parallel with other <strong>Bank</strong>funded<br />
activities such as the Dedicated Freight Corridor Project under preparation and nonlending<br />
technical assistance activities (workshops and study tours), the MUTP-2A project will<br />
support the preparation of this strategic plan as it applies to suburban areas, in particular through<br />
a provision in the loan for further technical assistance.<br />
13. The project supports environmentally friendly urban public transportation, which is<br />
recommended in the <strong>Bank</strong>’s sector strategy: “Safe, Affordable and Clean Transport”. Rail is one<br />
of the most energy-efficient modes of transportation and therefore a direct contributor to cutting<br />
GHG emissions, which are widely held responsible for climate change. It even compares well to<br />
other modes of public transport. Buses in India emit about 28 grams of CO 2 per passenger-km,<br />
whereas railways are about 2.5 times more efficient, emitting only about ten grams. The project<br />
will help promote the use of this more efficient and climate- friendly mode of public transport.<br />
Within its design, the project will support activities that further cut GHG emissions, such as<br />
regenerative braking for EMUs and conversion of the power supply from DC to AC. An<br />
additional benefit is the local impact on public health from the reduction in pollutants.<br />
II.<br />
PROJECT DESCRIPTION<br />
A. Lending Instrument<br />
14. The lending instrument to be used for this project is an IBRD Specific Investment<br />
Loan (SIL).<br />
B. Project Development Objective and Key Indicators<br />
15. The proposed project will build upon the progress made under the first <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />
Urban Transport Project and will further increase the capacity of the suburban rail system within<br />
3
the <strong>Mumbai</strong> metropolitan region. The project’s development objective is to improve the<br />
passenger carrying capacity, operational efficiency, level of comfort of, and the institutional<br />
capacity of entities involved in, the suburban rail system of <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan area.<br />
Accordingly its performance will be monitored through the following indicators:<br />
(a) additional capacity in vehicle-km during peak hours,<br />
(b) reduction in peak hour overcrowding,<br />
(c) reduction in journey times,<br />
(d) operational efficiency: reduction in energy consumption, and<br />
(e) institutional strengthening: carrying out technical assistance and preparing action plans<br />
C. Project Components<br />
16. The project has four components. The first three lead to the introduction of<br />
additional train services on <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s suburban rail network. The technical assistance<br />
component intends to strengthen the institutional and managerial capacity of MRVC and IR.<br />
Table 1 shows the project’s components and cost, as well as its financing. Its total cost is<br />
estimated at US$970.5 million, and the proposed IBRD loan, at 44 percent of the total, will be<br />
US$430 million.<br />
Table 1. Summary of Project Components, Costs and Financing<br />
(US$ million, including contingencies)<br />
Project Component<br />
IBRD<br />
Loan<br />
Counterpart<br />
Funding<br />
Total<br />
Cost<br />
Component 1<br />
Rolling Stock Fleet Increase 355.7 303.9 659.6<br />
Component 2<br />
DC to AC Conversion 55.2 118.6 173.8<br />
Component 3<br />
EMU Maintenance Facilities and Stabling Lines 0 117.7 117.7<br />
Component 4<br />
Technical Assistance 14.4 0.2 14.6<br />
Front-end Fee 1.075 - 1.075<br />
Unallocated 3.7 - 3.7<br />
Total Financing Sought 430.0 540.5 970.5<br />
Note: Physical and price contingencies are all included<br />
Component 1. EMU Rolling Stock Fleet Increase<br />
17. Under the project 864 additional EMU cars will be procured. This will increase the<br />
total fleet to around 3,124 cars. The <strong>Bank</strong> loan will finance the electrical equipment for the new<br />
cars, to be manufactured at Chennai Integral Coach Factory (ICF), while counterpart funds will<br />
cover the remaining costs of production. This continues the arrangement adopted under MUTP-<br />
1. As the power supply will be converted from DC to AC before these cars enter service, they<br />
4
will be designed and built for use on 25KV AC system only. This activity is expected to be<br />
completed by 2014-15.<br />
Component 2. Conversion of Power Supply from Direct Current to Alternating Current<br />
(including Improvements to Signals and Telecoms)<br />
18. Three sections of the MMR’s Central <strong>Railway</strong> network will be converted from<br />
1,500V DC traction to 25KV AC. This activity comprises (i) modifying overhead catenaries, (ii)<br />
installing power sub-stations, along with switching stations (iii) procuring catenary maintenance<br />
equipment; and (iv) modifying signal and telecom systems. This investment is needed to allow<br />
the operation of the increased fleet as a result of Component 1.<br />
19. The conversion is planned to be completed by 2012-13. In addition to creating<br />
capacity to run more trains, the conversion will cut transmission losses and reduce the need for<br />
maintenance of power supply installations. Regeneration of electricity during braking is more<br />
efficient under high-voltage systems, so this will add a third source of energy savings.<br />
Component 3. EMU Maintenance Facilities and Stabling Lines<br />
20. New stabling lines will be built to accommodate the additional trains supplied<br />
under the project. The existing EMU maintenance depot at Kurla on the Central <strong>Railway</strong> and the<br />
maintenance shed at Virar built under MUTP-1 will accommodate the new stabling lines. No<br />
new car maintenance shed or overhaul workshop is planned under MUTP-2A. In total, 73 new<br />
stabling lines will be built: 34 (including four extensions from 9-car to 12-car) on the Western<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> and 39 on the Central <strong>Railway</strong>. They will be fully funded by the government.<br />
Component 4. Capacity Strengthening and Technical Assistance<br />
21. Strategic and tactical studies will be carried out, as well as capacity building and<br />
training. This represents 1.5 percent of the total project cost.<br />
22. The strategic studies will include: (i) preparation of a priority development<br />
program for the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail services, consistent with the TranSforM Study and<br />
including pre-feasibility studies; (ii) support to IR in the development of their long-term strategy<br />
to implement Vision 2020, in particular for the suburban rail services; and (iii) a study to<br />
improve the financial situation of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail operation, mostly by maximizing<br />
non fare-box revenues.<br />
23. Tactical studies include the following: (i) a ticketing study aiming at establishing a<br />
more efficient and user-friendly ticketing system for <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s suburban rail system; (ii) study<br />
and design of an improved passenger information system for the system; (iii) a study to reduce<br />
the number of accidents due to trespassing, and (iv) a study to identify specific improvements to<br />
environmental practices within the operations of the Central and Western <strong>Railway</strong>s.<br />
24. Capacity building will include supply and installation of software for improved<br />
power supply and operation simulation. Training will aim at reinforcing the professional<br />
efficiency of MRVC officers on the basis of an approved training plan.<br />
Lessons Learned and Reflected in the Project Design<br />
5
25. The on-going MUTP-1 project has made significant progress towards achieving<br />
its development objectives with a noted reduction in overcrowding in suburban trains and<br />
operation of new buses of improved design. The MMR Development Authority (MMRDA) has<br />
improved its capacity to manage resettlement and rehabilitation that is now implemented with<br />
reasonable quality. But land acquisition and resettlement and rehabilitation are still slow, as is<br />
road construction.<br />
26. The design of MUTP-2A builds on the following key lessons learned from the<br />
implementation of MUTP-1 and other transport operations in India.<br />
27. Motivation, ownership, effective implementation planning and sustained followup<br />
on the part of the client is an important factor in implementation success. MRVC, which<br />
started off as a new entity has in course of implementing MUTP-1 developed management<br />
experience, expertise in <strong>Bank</strong>-assisted operations and capacity to liaise with the several<br />
departments and agencies of IR 2 , GOM, and other stakeholders for implementing the project’s<br />
suburban rail component. This experience has given MRVC the required understanding and<br />
confidence to implement a new externally-funded project on its own in coordination with other<br />
institutions and agencies.<br />
28. The project should be designed in a way that inter-agency coordination does not<br />
become an obstacle to carrying out key activities. One of the key reasons explaining the slow<br />
pace of MUTP-1’s implementation was the complex project design with ambitious<br />
implementation arrangements, involving multiple implementing agencies without effective<br />
coordination. Five project implementing agencies were involved, with MMRDA as the<br />
coordinator. It would have benefitted from a clearer contractual co-ordination framework to<br />
ensure effective progress. Long delays in project components such as station area improvement<br />
schemes and road-over-bridges, requiring greater inter-agency coordination, forced the removal<br />
of these sub-projects from MUTP-1 as part of a project restructuring. To minimize such delays<br />
on account of weak co-operation and ineffective inter-agency coordination, MUTP-2A has been<br />
designed as a simple but comprehensive project for enhancing the quality and magnitude of the<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail operations, through activities that will involve essentially IR agencies<br />
coordinated by MRVC. Implementation arrangements for MUTP-2A have been planned in such<br />
a way that progress will not be vulnerable to poor inter-agency coordination.<br />
29. Project design should adequately focus on capacity building of the client,<br />
especially in new areas, and leave space for implementation arrangements to evolve, instead of<br />
being frozen in time, to achieve greater efficiency. The nature and significance of some major<br />
resettlement difficulties were appreciated by the client during the process of implementation.<br />
Through very active <strong>Bank</strong> involvement, MMRDA has gradually evolved a more sustainable and<br />
2 Central <strong>Railway</strong> and Western <strong>Railway</strong> are two of the largest and busiest of the 16 zones of Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s. Their<br />
respective divisions, <strong>Mumbai</strong> Division of the Central <strong>Railway</strong> and <strong>Mumbai</strong> Central Division of the Western<br />
<strong>Railway</strong>, are involved in this project. IR is a department owned and controlled by GOI, via MOR. IR manufactures<br />
much of its rolling stock and heavy engineering components at its six manufacturing plants, called production units,<br />
which are managed directly by the Ministry. Chennai ICF is one of these. Each of the six production units is headed<br />
by a general manager, who reports directly to the <strong>Railway</strong>s Board. The Research Design and Standards Organization<br />
(RDSO) is a research and development organization under MOR, which functions as a technical adviser and<br />
consultant to the <strong>Railway</strong>s Board, the zonal railways, and the railway production units in respect of design and<br />
standardization of railway equipment and problems related to railway construction, operation and maintenance.<br />
6
consultative approach. It developed capacity for managing large-scale and complex resettlement<br />
processes. The present project includes several studies that will help MRVC and IR strengthen<br />
their capacity to address difficult and sensitive challenges, such as the safety of trespassers,<br />
environmental management and financial sustainability.<br />
30. Mechanisms for strengthening transparency, accountability, and good<br />
governance should be planned upstream and integrated into the project design to enhance<br />
implementation quality and outcomes. Successful implementation of social safeguards, the most<br />
challenging issue in MUTP-1, was due to establishing effective institutional mechanisms. These<br />
included an independent monitoring panel for third-party monitoring and a transparent and<br />
accountable grievance redress mechanism for resolving complaints and disputes. Measures for<br />
transparency, accountability, and good governance, including third-party monitoring and dispute<br />
resolution, are incorporated in MUTP-2A as a part of the Governance and Accountability Plan.<br />
31. Urban transport projects undertaken in diverse and challenging metropolitan<br />
settings such as <strong>Mumbai</strong> involve complex political-economy issues. They need to be<br />
anticipated and the project designed accordingly, so that the implementation trajectory<br />
remains well within the reach of the implementing and funding agencies. Factors other than<br />
inter-agency coordination that posed roadblocks in implementation of MUTP-1 included difficult<br />
political economy issues, especially with regard to management of necessary land acquisition,<br />
resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R). MUTP-2A has been carefully designed to avoid land<br />
acquisition and R&R activities. Compared to MUTP-1, which required resettlement of some<br />
19,000 project-affected households, MUTP-2A does not involve any land acquisition, and<br />
squatter households required to be resettled may not exceed twenty.<br />
D. Alternatives Considered and Reasons for Rejection<br />
32. Type of <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> financing: The possibility of treating the project as<br />
additional financing for MUTP-1 instead of a separate project was discussed. However, the<br />
activities planned for MUTP-2A may go beyond three years of the expected closing date of the<br />
on-going loan, the limit allowed by <strong>Bank</strong> policy, so additional financing would not be possible.<br />
Also, the additional financing option would be financially less advantageous for the Borrower. It<br />
was agreed that MUTP-2A should be prepared as a separate project as initially stated.<br />
33. Number of rakes included in the project: Initially the project design included the<br />
procurement of only 60 12-car rakes, the maximum that could be used efficiently on the existing<br />
infrastructure. However, simulation information provided by MRVC showed that it will be<br />
possible to use 72 rakes efficiently on the infrastructure available at the end of MUTP-2A, and<br />
the project has been adjusted to this higher value to further improve the system’s capacity.<br />
34. Number and size of stabling lines: Initially a larger number of stabling lines were<br />
considered to be installed under the project, but they were excluded to minimize land acquisition<br />
and resettlement impacts. The project has been designed in a way that it requires no private land<br />
acquisition and involves no resettlement activities.<br />
7
III.<br />
IMPLEMENTATION<br />
A. Institutional and Implementation Arrangements<br />
35. MUTP-2A will continue with the institutional arrangements put in place under<br />
MUTP-1 that proved to be efficient for an effective partnership between the Government of<br />
Maharashtra state and Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s in carrying out the project. MRVC, incorporated under<br />
the Companies Act, 1956, is a Public Sector Undertaking, limited by shares, of the Indian<br />
government under IR. Owned almost equally by GOM and IR, MRVC is expected to coordinate<br />
and implement development projects for the suburban rail system in <strong>Mumbai</strong> on behalf of GOM<br />
and IR. MRVC will receive a fee called Directional and General (D&G) charges from GOM and<br />
IR for its services under MUTP-2A.<br />
36. MRVC is the project implementing agency for MUTP-2A and in that role is<br />
accountable for satisfactory completion of all the project works. MMRDA, ICF, RDSO, WR and<br />
CR are executing agencies. As the project implementing agency, MRVC, on behalf of GOM and<br />
IR, is responsible for financing and procuring all the contracts financed by the loan, including the<br />
rolling stock and power supply equipment, as well as for executing certain identified works in<br />
the field, with due safeguards in consultation with the Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s. Memoranda of<br />
understanding which incorporate insurance to respect the environmental management plan, time<br />
line of works and activities to be carried out by the respective agencies, will be set up between<br />
MRVC and the executing agencies.<br />
37. GOM and IR will share the investment costs of the <strong>Bank</strong>-financed project on a<br />
50/50 basis, making GOM a key beneficiary and stakeholder of the project along with IR. The<br />
project will benefit from this partnership and will seek ways to further deepen it through<br />
technical assistance and capacity building. GOM and IR will ensure that its activities under the<br />
Project are carried out in accordance with the provisions of the Implementation Manual, SMF,<br />
and EMPs, and in accordance with the provisions of the Anti-Corruption Guidelines, and shall<br />
ensure that the Implementation Manual, SMF, and EMPs are not materially revised, amended,<br />
waived, or abrogated without the prior no objection of the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />
38. Flow of Funds and Financial Management: The borrower of the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong><br />
loan will be India, who will make its proceeds available to MOR and GOM. One half of each<br />
loan disbursement will be released to GOM as Additional Central Assistance under the standard<br />
policy of external assistance to a State and to MOR through the General Budget. MOR and GOM<br />
will provide loan and counterpart funds to MRVC. MRVC will be responsible for financial<br />
management arrangements for the project. A recently completed assessment concluded that<br />
MRVC has a financial management system adequate to account for and report on the project<br />
resources and expenditures accurately. The responsibility for overall project financial<br />
management will rest with MRVC’s Director (Finance), who will be responsible for activities<br />
relating to compiling project budgets, project accounting, reporting to the <strong>Bank</strong> in a timely<br />
manner, submitting applications to the <strong>Bank</strong> for direct payments, advances and replenishments<br />
and periodical audits. The project financial management cell will remain adequately staffed<br />
during the implementation of the project.<br />
8
39. Safeguards Management: An environmental management plan (EMP) and a<br />
social management framework (SMF) for the project have been prepared satisfactory to <strong>Bank</strong><br />
which are in line with those approved by the <strong>Bank</strong> for MUTP-1. It is expected that both MRVC<br />
and CR will hire a project management consultant to assist them in implementing the project. In<br />
addition, MRVC has obtained ISO 14001 certification for its environmental management system.<br />
The project’s environmental management plans (EMP will form the basis on which its<br />
performance will be measured. The management representative required by the ISO compliance<br />
system will be the Deputy Chief Engineer. S/he will supervise the consultant hired by MRVC<br />
and co-ordinate with the respective chief engineer of CR to confirm compliance with the relevant<br />
provisions of the EMP. For the contracts to be executed through the participating railways, it has<br />
been agreed that the relevant provisions from the <strong>Railway</strong> Contracts Manual will be enforced and<br />
the necessary instructions to the contractors are to be issued. The project does not involve any<br />
private land acquisition or resettlement impacts. However, MRVC has prepared a Social<br />
Management Framework (SMF) Social management framework referred to in Chapter-3 of the<br />
Project Implementation Manual in order to deal with any LA or R&R in case of any future<br />
alterations in design or layout. MRVC has also reached an understanding with MMRDA that the<br />
latter will implement any future resettlement activities as required on behalf of MRVC as per the<br />
<strong>Bank</strong> approved SMF that is based on the Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R) policy for<br />
MUTP-1. Adverse impacts relating to access, health, safety, and unequal wages are common to<br />
most civil works and will be addressed by the concerned railways’ divisions as part of<br />
construction management, which MRVC will monitor.<br />
B. Monitoring and Evaluation of Outcomes/Results<br />
40. The Results Framework shown in Annex 3 is the main instrument for monitoring<br />
and evaluating achievement of the project developmental objective (PDO) and outcome<br />
indicators. The project’s main outcome indicators, namely additional capacity, peak hour<br />
overcrowding, journey times and energy consumption, will be generated by routine monitoring<br />
by MRVC using ridership/occupancy surveys of commuters and operational statistics, compiled<br />
in yearly reports. This will help in assessing the project’s contribution to enhancing the capacity,<br />
efficiency and financial viability of MMR’s suburban rail transport system and to redirect it, if<br />
necessary, to achieve the PDO. MRVC has provided baseline and end-of-project target values for<br />
the outcome and most of the intermediate performance indicators.<br />
C. Sustainability<br />
41. Since the proposed project intends to reduce overcrowding, the financial<br />
performance of the suburban rail operations is expected to deteriorate in the medium term as a<br />
result, unless revenues increase slightly faster than the cost price index. However, <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s<br />
suburban operations represent a comparatively small share of IR’s total business, so they have<br />
only a minor impact on IR’s overall financial performance, which is far more dependent on<br />
railway-wide tariff policies and continued strong growth in freight traffic. Therefore this<br />
financial condition is not expected to impact significantly the sustainability of the operation and<br />
maintenance of the suburban rail system.<br />
42. MRVC has been given the main mandate to formulate and implement rail<br />
infrastructure projects that require coordination between MOR and GOM. It is funded<br />
9
accordingly by both administrations. However, this does not make MRVC a permanent structure<br />
and MRVC will remain in existence only as long as it is judged necessary beyond the year 2014,<br />
the end of the current MOU. An amendment to the MOU will be signed to ensure that MRVC<br />
continues as implementing agency of MUTP-2A until its completion.<br />
D. Critical Risks and Possible Controversial Aspects<br />
Risks Risk Mitigation Measures Risk Rating with Mitigation Risk Rating<br />
Operation-specific Risks<br />
Technical Design Demand assessment risk: demand may<br />
exceed the forecast, thereby reducing<br />
the expected passenger comfort<br />
benefits (reduced overcrowding). This<br />
can happen because population or<br />
Additional counts will be made during<br />
project preparation and project<br />
implementation to monitor passenger<br />
loadings. The pace of implementation of<br />
the Strategic Transport Plan may be<br />
economic growth does not change as<br />
forecast. It can also happen because<br />
the fare does not rise at the same pace<br />
as the cost escalation index. Based on<br />
recent traffic counts, this risk is<br />
moderate.<br />
revised accordingly.<br />
Moderate<br />
Implementation<br />
Capacity and<br />
Sustainability<br />
Financial<br />
Management<br />
About ten percent of electric motors<br />
have failed in trains so far delivered<br />
under MUTP-1, with a small impact<br />
on operations as the Vendor has<br />
replaced them, but with moderate<br />
future risk.<br />
Financial sustainability: continuation<br />
of the present fare level trend will<br />
increase the financial deficit of the<br />
suburban operation, creating a<br />
medium-term financial risk for IR.<br />
Possibility of certain gaps in corporate<br />
governance and financial<br />
accountability and management<br />
practices in MRVC. (MRVC is in the<br />
process of implementing MUTP-1 and<br />
is already familiar with <strong>Bank</strong><br />
procedures).<br />
The <strong>Bank</strong> team will encourage IR to pay<br />
more attention to qualification of critical<br />
items of rolling stock procurement.<br />
The impact of the project on IR’s financial<br />
performance as a whole is considered small<br />
and not liable to affect significantly the<br />
sustainability of the suburban operations<br />
and maintenance.<br />
An assessment of corporate governance<br />
and financial accountability (CGFA)<br />
arrangements in MRVC has been<br />
completed. The objective of the assessment<br />
is to (i) benchmark current CGFA practices<br />
in MRVC against industry standards and<br />
good practices and (ii) agree on an action<br />
plan with dates for implementing capacity<br />
building measures that are identified.<br />
Progress on the agreed action plan would<br />
be monitored during project preparation<br />
and prior to implementation.<br />
Funds will flow to MRVC through budget<br />
release, which will be replenished by the<br />
<strong>Bank</strong> on the basis of quarterly interim<br />
unaudited financial reports and expenditure<br />
forecasts. Direct payment by the <strong>Bank</strong> to<br />
the suppliers will be the likely option under<br />
the project. The project will comprise only<br />
a few large supply contracts, which will be<br />
subject to prior review by the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />
Low<br />
Low<br />
Moderate<br />
(subject to<br />
progress of<br />
implementati<br />
on of agreed<br />
CGFA action<br />
plan<br />
10
Procurement<br />
Social and<br />
Environmental<br />
Safeguards<br />
Use of the <strong>Bank</strong>’s revised standard<br />
bidding documents may require an<br />
initial familiarization period, which<br />
may result in delays in finalizing<br />
contract awards.<br />
Since all procurement packages are<br />
large values, there is likelihood of<br />
delay in decision making, generally<br />
for all packages that involve RDSO as<br />
the design organization with mandate<br />
to clear the specifications and<br />
particularly for procurement of EMU<br />
rolling stock, as clearances will be<br />
required at the <strong>Railway</strong> Board/GOI<br />
levels.<br />
There are no substantial risks in this<br />
project associated with social and<br />
environmental impacts. All physical<br />
activities are located within the<br />
existing railway lands and involve no<br />
land acquisition or resettlement<br />
impacts. (a) However, stabling lines<br />
proposed at Virar Scrap yard may<br />
pose hazard risks for people living in<br />
hutments outside the execution area<br />
but near the railway racks.<br />
(b) Any alteration the project design<br />
may require LA and R&R measures.<br />
<strong>Bank</strong> staff will guide MRVC staff in<br />
under-standing the various changes and<br />
their import, even during the period of<br />
issue and receipt of bidding documents,<br />
and clarify doubts at all stages, to avoid<br />
long delays.<br />
The team will discuss and agree on<br />
arrangements that will be worked out with<br />
RDSO and the <strong>Railway</strong> Board to<br />
participate early on during the bidding and<br />
later evaluation process of these<br />
procurements.<br />
(a) MRVC carried out a supplementary<br />
social impact assessment survey in order to<br />
reconfirm the nature and magnitude of<br />
adverse impacts on a few households living<br />
alongside the rail tracks leading to the<br />
proposed stabling lines site at the Virar<br />
Scrap Yard. The study confirmed that there<br />
is no LA or R&R impacts. In order to<br />
address the safety issues, <strong>Railway</strong>s will<br />
barricade the whole stretch from the rail<br />
tracks and the stabling site.<br />
(b) MRVC has prepared a SMF acceptable<br />
to the <strong>Bank</strong>, based on the R&R Policy<br />
approved for the ongoing MUTP-1 to deal<br />
with any LA or R&R impacts caused due<br />
to any alteration in design or outlay. In<br />
continuation of the arrangements<br />
established for MUTP-1, MRVC will carry<br />
out any necessary LA through the state<br />
government whereas R&R measures will<br />
be implemented by MMRDA on behalf of<br />
MRVC. Adverse impacts relating to<br />
access, health, safety, and unequal wages<br />
are common to most civil works and will<br />
be addressed by the concerned railway<br />
divisions as part of construction<br />
management, which MRVC will monitor.<br />
Low<br />
Moderate<br />
Moderate<br />
Overall risk (including reputational risks)<br />
Moderate<br />
E. Loan conditions and covenants<br />
43. Conditions of Effectiveness: Subsidiary financing agreement between MRVC and<br />
GOM and the MOU between MRVC and the ICF have been executed.<br />
11
IV.<br />
APPRAISAL SUMMARY<br />
A. Economic and financial analyses<br />
44. Economic analysis: Since this project is a continuation of the earlier MUTP-1<br />
project, the economic analysis for this project has been conducted comparing the proposed<br />
additional project components as the ‘with’ alternative against the situation at the end of MUTP-<br />
1 as the ‘without’ alternative.<br />
45. The analysis has been carried out of the project’s incremental costs and benefits.<br />
The economic analysis for the suburban rail component done at the stage of MUTP-1 has been<br />
updated to current prices. The assumptions have been modified after comparing the results of the<br />
earlier analysis with the actual outputs for traffic, average trip length, increase in other traffic<br />
(passengers and freight), procurement of rakes and the cost of various components. The revised<br />
assumptions were then used to add the proposed components (MUTP-2A) and their costs to<br />
estimate the total benefits of the whole project. The difference in costs and benefits for MUTP-1,<br />
‘with’ and ‘without’ MUTP-2A were computed to arrive at the economic rate of return for the<br />
proposed component.<br />
46. The evaluation shows that the project will have an economic rate of return of 17<br />
percent and net present value, discounted to 2010, of US$262 million in 2008 prices at a 12<br />
percent discount rate over a thirty-five-year evaluation period (2010 to 2045). The above results<br />
indicate that the project is very viable economically and the <strong>Mumbai</strong> city will gain from the<br />
better suburban system, the lifeline for commuter transport in the city. Detailed analysis is<br />
provided in Annex 9.<br />
47. Financial analysis: MRVC has made financial projections of the <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />
suburban system over a 35-year period, based on 2008-09, and related them to the overall<br />
financial performance of IR. It took into account the impact of both the on-going MUTP-1<br />
(assumed to be completed in 2010-11) and MUTP-2A (assumed to be completed in 2014-15). A<br />
Base Case analysis was undertaken, as well as sensitivity analyses for the key assumptions. The<br />
model was originally developed as part of the Financial and Institutional Study of the <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />
Suburban System in 1996 and has since been used regularly to forecast demand, earnings and<br />
operating expenses, generally performing well.<br />
48. In 2008-09, the <strong>Mumbai</strong> system represented an estimated 12 percent of IR’s<br />
passenger traffic (measured in passenger-km) and about seven percent of IR’s total traffic<br />
including freight. However, because of the very high average loads carried and the low average<br />
fare, it only generated about 1.5 percent of IR’s total revenue and about two percent of its total<br />
working expenses (excluding depreciation). Because MUTP-2A will reduce over-crowding and<br />
thus require more assets and services to carry the same volume of traffic, its financial<br />
performance is likely to deteriorate for at least the medium-term. However, its comparatively<br />
small share of the total IR business means that it will have only a minor impact on the financial<br />
performance of IR as a whole, which is far more dependent on railway-wide tariff policies and<br />
continued strong growth in freight traffic. Detailed financial analysis is given in Annex 9.<br />
12
B. Technical<br />
49. During MUTP-2A it is expected that the same signaling and telecom technology<br />
will be used as existed during MUTP-1, i.e. digital axle counters, both compatible with AC<br />
traction. The technical specification for the EMU cars was the subject of extensive discussion<br />
with IR during the preparation of MUTP-1. Two separate independent reviews were undertaken,<br />
one commissioned by IR, the other by the <strong>Bank</strong>. These confirmed that the specifications were<br />
appropriate for the particular conditions in <strong>Mumbai</strong> (very heavy passenger loadings and difficult<br />
operating conditions during the monsoon season) and are in line with current international trends.<br />
50. The new EMU coaches will be provided with (i) “state-of-the-art” 3-phase<br />
“Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) based” AC traction technology with improved energy<br />
efficiency and reliability, (ii) maintenance-free, higher horse-power (30 percent) 3-phase AC<br />
traction motors with Variable Voltage Variable Frequency control, (iii) a GPS-based<br />
microprocessor-controlled passenger information system, (iv) higher acceleration and<br />
deceleration of 0.54 m/s/s and 0.76 m/s/s respectively, with a maximum speed of 100 km/hr, (v)<br />
a forced air ventilation system to maintain the difference in CO 2 level between the inside and<br />
outside of the coach within 700 ppm as per international standards, (vi) air-conditioned driver’s<br />
cab and provision of capacity for power supply for air conditioning of passenger areas of the<br />
EMUs as a retrofit at a later date, and (vii) air springs in secondary suspension for better riding<br />
quality.<br />
C. Fiduciary<br />
51. Financial management (FM): The design of the FM arrangements for the proposed<br />
project builds on the following strength in the area of financial management of MUTP-1: a<br />
budgeting, accounting and reporting system has been operational in the entity for the past several<br />
years, which will be used for accounting and generating the required financial reports under<br />
MUTP-2A. MRVC has prior experience in implementing <strong>Bank</strong> financed project (MUTP-1) and<br />
its FM policies and procedures are being further strengthened for implementing MUTP-2A.<br />
52. Disbursement arrangements: The project will be funded through budget releases to<br />
MRVC by MOR and GOM as in the case of MUTP-1. Separate budget codes will be established<br />
for the purpose by MRVC. The IBRD funds will flow to MOR (through the general budget) and<br />
GOM (through Additional Central Assistance) from the GOI’s Office of Aid, Audit and<br />
Accounts. The repayment of the loan will be done by GOI/GOM in equal parts and the surcharge<br />
already levied on suburban commuters will contribute to this repayment fund. Of the total<br />
surcharge collected 50 percent will be transferred to MOR by CR and WR and the remaining 50<br />
percent will be transferred to GOM or adjusted against GOM receivables by MRVC. IBRD will<br />
advance an amount equivalent to six months’ forecast expenditure, to be deposited in the<br />
Designated Account that will be opened by the Ministry of Finance. Subsequent disbursements<br />
by the <strong>Bank</strong> will be routed through the Designated Account. Disbursements by IBRD will be<br />
made on the basis of the quarterly interim unaudited financial reports submitted by MRVC.<br />
Supporting documentation, including completion reports, certifications, bills and other<br />
documentation will be retained by MRVC and made available to the <strong>Bank</strong> during project<br />
supervision. These will also be audited as a part of the annual audit of project financial<br />
statements. Retroactive financing will be available under the project for payments made within<br />
13
12 months prior to the expected date of the loan agreement and to be eligible, the activities<br />
should be procured as per <strong>Bank</strong> guidelines on procurement.<br />
53. External Audit: As per Section 619(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, MRVC’s<br />
statutory auditors will be appointed by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) to carry out<br />
an independent audit and express their opinion as per the requirements of the Companies Act. In<br />
addition, the CAG through its Principal Director of Commercial Audit may also conduct<br />
supplementary audits under Section 619 (3)(b) of the Companies Act on the audited financial<br />
statements. After the completion of the statutory audit and supplementary audit, the audited<br />
accounts and auditors’ reports are adopted by MRVC’s Annual General Meeting. Statutory<br />
audits of MRVC are on schedule. They do not contain any material observations. In addition to<br />
the audits under the Companies Act, MRVC is subject to proprietary audit/ inspection by the<br />
Office of the Principal Director of Commercial Audit.<br />
54. Procurement: Procurement under the project will be carried out by MRVC. MOR<br />
has implemented several <strong>Bank</strong>-funded projects aimed at modernizing India’s railways.<br />
Generally the officers are aware of the procurement procedures followed in these projects.<br />
MRVC will depute some representatives who will deal with this procurement, to the training<br />
programs organized by Administrative Staff College of India, the National Institute of Financial<br />
Management or other reputable institute for updating their knowledge on procurement.<br />
55. MRVC has been delegated authority by IR to make procurement decisions for<br />
contracts up to a value of Rs. 1,000 million (about US$20 million). All contracts except the one<br />
for the procurement of EMUs electric equipments will be within this threshold. The value of the<br />
EMU contract is expected to be over US$20 million. In this case, the bid evaluation will be<br />
carried out by a committee of MRVC and RDSO and forwarded to Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s Board for<br />
review and approval of recommendations. MRVC and IR have agreed on a timetable for<br />
completing the various stages of bid evaluation and award of contract, to ensure that the contract<br />
is awarded within 150 days of bid opening.<br />
56. The agency is staffed by qualified technical personnel and managers, well versed<br />
in the project’s technical aspects. Some of the officials have undergone training in <strong>Bank</strong><br />
procurement and most of the officers have handled procurement under <strong>Bank</strong>-funded projects.<br />
Considering that MRVC has implemented the on-going MUTP-1 successfully, fresh assessment<br />
of the capacity of MRVC to carry out procurement for the project has not been considered<br />
essential and not done formally. However, based on the experience of the staff engaged in the<br />
first project and little change in the organizational structure for implementing the second project,<br />
the <strong>Bank</strong> team concludes that the agency has adequate capacity to handle procurement under this<br />
project. The procurement risk is assessed as ‘moderate’ in view of the large packages proposed<br />
and considering the possibility of delays due to involvement of several agencies in the decisionmaking<br />
process.<br />
57. Procurement for the proposed project will be carried out in accordance with the<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>’s "Guidelines: Procurement under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits" dated May 2004<br />
revised in October 2006; and "Guidelines: Selection and Employment of Consultants by <strong>World</strong><br />
<strong>Bank</strong> Borrowers" dated May 2004 revised in October 2006, and the provisions stipulated in the<br />
loan agreement. The various items under different expenditure categories are described in<br />
14
general in Annex 8. For each contract to be financed by the loan, the different procurement<br />
methods or consultant selection methods, the need for pre-qualification, estimated costs, prior<br />
review requirements, and time frame have been agreed between the Borrower and the <strong>Bank</strong> in<br />
the Procurement Plan. This Plan will be updated at least annually or as required to reflect the<br />
actual project implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity.<br />
D. Social<br />
58. Potential social risks: The project with its current design and outlay involves no<br />
involuntary resettlement impacts with the proposed activities of stabling lines, traction substations,<br />
section and sub-section posts and maintenance facilities requiring no land acquisition.<br />
The stabling lines will be built over about 28 ha of railway land, only along existing railway<br />
tracks. All other facilities, where choice of location can be flexible, have been planned to be<br />
developed on vacant plots available with the <strong>Railway</strong>s. Thus, MRVC has carefully explored<br />
various alternatives and has ensured that no private lands will need to be acquired, in order to<br />
avoid and minimize adverse social impacts. A supplementary social impact survey was<br />
undertaken by MRVC at Virar Scrap Yard to assess the likely impact on 38 structures located<br />
close to railway tracks. The survey confirmed that no land acquisition or resettlement measure<br />
was required.<br />
59. In order to deal with any future involuntary resettlement impacts due to any<br />
possible alteration in design or outlay, MRVC has prepared and adopted a social management<br />
framework (SMF) detailed under the MUTP R&R Policy, which was adopted for the ongoing<br />
MUTP-1 and is satisfactory to the <strong>Bank</strong>. The SMF is referred to in the Chapter-3 of the Project<br />
Implementation Manual, which also provides that any necessary resettlement and rehabilitation<br />
(R&R) measures will be carried out by MMRDA on behalf of MRVC. In such an event, MRVC<br />
will prepare a specific resettlement action plan (RAP) based on the SMF, in a manner acceptable<br />
and satisfactory to the <strong>Bank</strong>. This arrangement is a continuation of the arrangement established<br />
for implementing R&R measures for the rail component of MUTP-1. Other social safeguard<br />
risks relating to access, health, safety, and unequal wages will be monitored and mitigated as part<br />
of construction management.<br />
60. Assessment approach: In order to identify and assess the nature and magnitude of<br />
social impacts, MRVC has carried out a social impact assessment (SIA) as part of the<br />
Environment Assessment (EA). The EA Report, which includes a separate section on social<br />
issues, has confirmed that the project will require no private land acquisition. A few railway<br />
employees earlier living at the proposed site at Thane have shifted away after the project was<br />
announced and some ten such railway employees living close to the proposed stabling lines at<br />
Bhaindar North informed during EA that they will shift away before the commencement of the<br />
work. As railway staff, they will be provided with staff quarters or monthly house rent allowance<br />
enabling them to relocate away from this place. A supplementary social impact survey was<br />
carried out at the proposed site for stabling lines at the Virar Scrap yard to assess the nature and<br />
magnitude of impact on 38 structures located close to the railway tracks. The survey findings<br />
were as follows: (a) Out of 38 structures, 37 were residential structures and one was a temple;<br />
none of these are affected by the proposed stabling lines work; however, (b) 13 of these<br />
structures are located alongside tracks and occupied by railway employees living there; the<br />
15
families need to be shifted for safety reasons; and they will be provided with staff quarters or<br />
receive monthly house rent allowance enabling them to relocate; c) the other structures including<br />
a temple and residences for 18 squatter households and six tenants (in private houses) are beyond<br />
the execution zone and will not need to be relocated; (d) the execution areas and the railway<br />
tracks at this stretch will be barricaded for enhancing human safety.<br />
61. At certain other proposed work sites, some lands required for the project have been<br />
licensed out by the <strong>Railway</strong>s to its employees for vegetable cultivation in order to prevent<br />
encroachment. These licenses are issued on annual basis and will normally be allowed to run<br />
their course before the work commences. In cases where this is not possible, the licenses will be<br />
terminated with one month’s advance notice as per the license terms and conditions by the<br />
<strong>Railway</strong>s providing the licensees with sufficient time to harvest crops and salvage assets if any<br />
before such licenses come to an end.<br />
62. Resettlement instrument and measures: The results of the EA and supplementary<br />
social impact survey carried out by MRVC confirmed that no land acquisition or R&R measures<br />
are required for the project. In order to deal with any future involuntary resettlement impacts due<br />
to any alteration in design or outlay, MRVC has prepared and adopted a Social Management<br />
Framework (SMF). which is detailed under the R&R Policy, which was adopted for the ongoing<br />
MUTP-1 and is satisfactory to the <strong>Bank</strong>, setting forth the rules and procedures for carrying out<br />
any social, resettlement and rehabilitation activities under the Project, including identification,<br />
assessment and mitigation of potential environmental and social impacts arising from the Project,<br />
carrying out consultations, processing and redressing grievances, monitoring related impacts,<br />
and, if required, limited resettlement and rehabilitation action plans and other development and<br />
entitlement plans for people adversely affected as result of Project implementation.<br />
63. Implementation arrangements for mitigation measures: The implementing<br />
agency has fair experience in coordinating land acquisition and resettlement activities with the<br />
state government. It was involved with the land acquisition for carrying out the rail component of<br />
MUTP-1. MRVC has gained considerable exposure to the sensitiveness of urban resettlement<br />
issues by way of coordinating with MMRDA in resettling a large number of project-affected<br />
people from along the railway sub-projects of MUTP-1. This arrangement is a continuation of<br />
the arrangement established for implementing R&R measures for the rail component of MUTP-<br />
1. MRVC’s main task will be to coordinate efforts with MMRDA for carrying out the mitigation<br />
measures, for management of which it has the required capacity.<br />
64. Social safeguards in Project Implementation Manual: The current project design<br />
involves no private land acquisition or resettlement impacts. MRVC has prepared a Project<br />
Implementation Manual, the Chapter-3 of which refers to the social management framework<br />
which will enable MRVC to address land acquisition and R&R issues in the event of any future<br />
alteration in the project design or lay out.<br />
E. Environment<br />
65. Potential Environment Issues: The project activities under MUTP-2A are<br />
expected to have only a few negative environmental impacts. These will mostly occur in areas<br />
where new stabling lines or traction substations are proposed. Augmentation of workshops is<br />
16
likely to have few adverse environmental impacts. The long-term impacts identified include tree<br />
cutting at proposed sites, potential for damage to (only a few) mangroves in one location, and<br />
potential traffic safety hazards due to re-routing in select locations. Additionally, temporary<br />
impacts related with the construction stage are also expected on the following aspects: increased<br />
air pollution and safety hazard due to increased traffic, especially close to sensitive receptors,<br />
increased noise levels, potential impacts from improper handling of hazardous substances like<br />
asbestos and oils, pollution of water courses close to sites, and provision for labor. In light of<br />
these limited impacts, the project has been assigned Category B.<br />
66. Assessment Approach: The environmental assessment has included review of the<br />
relevant activities in MUTP-1, followed by site visits to potential sites under the project and onsite<br />
discussions with stakeholders, including railway officials. This has been followed up by a<br />
review of the contract documents for environmental management aspects. Prototype<br />
environmental management plans have been prepared for activities that are common across sites.<br />
Plans have then been modified to suit site conditions such as at Chinchpokli traction substation,<br />
where handling asbestos is likely to be an important issue. A framework has been prepared to<br />
assess and manage impacts in locations where sites may have to be changed due to unforeseen<br />
circumstances. The resultant generic environmental management plan has been included in the<br />
project’s Operations Manual.<br />
67. Environmental Management: The experience gained during the preparation and<br />
implementation of MUTP-1 has been advantageously used in establishing the current approach<br />
to environmental management. Permissions for cutting/transplanting trees will be obtained<br />
before work starts on site and the contractors will be required to obtain the required regulatory<br />
clearances. Following the review of contract documents as part of the EA, modifications have<br />
been agreed to mainstream environmental management measures in the contracts executed<br />
through MRVC. For the contracts to be executed through the participating CR and WR, it has<br />
been agreed that the relevant provisions from the <strong>Railway</strong> Contracts Manual are to be enforced<br />
and the necessary instructions to the contractors are to be issued. Since MRVC has already<br />
qualified organization-wide as an ISO 14001-compliant environmental management system,<br />
handling of environmental measures is expected to be streamlined, on the basis of the EMPs<br />
prepared under the project.<br />
F. Safeguard policies<br />
Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project Yes No<br />
Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01) [X] [ ]<br />
Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04) [ ] [X]<br />
Pest Management (OP 4.09) [ ] [X]<br />
Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11) [ ] [X]<br />
Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12) [X] [ ]<br />
Indigenous Peoples (OP/BP 4.10) [ ] [X]<br />
Forests (OP/BP 4.36) [ ] [X]<br />
Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37) [ ] [X]<br />
Projects in Disputed Areas (OP/BP 7.60) [ ] [X]<br />
Projects on International Waterways (OP/BP 7.50) [ ] [X]<br />
17
Environmental Assessment (OP/BP/GP 4.01). The environmental category of the Project is B.<br />
Disclosure. Consultations were held with local people during preparation of the environmental<br />
and social assessments. Since the majority of stakeholders are railway employees, discussions<br />
were also held with railway officials on the likely impacts, and how to handle these. The two<br />
assessments, once finalized, will be disclosed on the MRVC website and copies of the summary<br />
will also be available in Marathi for perusal in the local railways’ offices.<br />
G. Policy Exceptions and Readiness<br />
68. No policy exceptions are required. The project complies with the readiness filter for<br />
transport projects in India. The first-year contracts and consultants are in advanced stages of<br />
bidding.<br />
18
Annex 1: Country and Sector or Program Background<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
Urbanization and Infrastructure Development in India<br />
69. In recent years India’s GDP has grown rapidly, at an average pace of eight percent per<br />
year and a peak of 9.7 percent in 2006-07. At the same time its inhabitants are moving from the<br />
countryside to cities in large numbers. By 2030 more than 40 percent of India’s population will<br />
be living in cities and towns, up from 28 percent today; the urban population, growing at three<br />
percent per year, will have doubled from 286 million to 575 million. In India as elsewhere,<br />
urbanization has been recognized as an important driver of economic growth, and cities now<br />
contribute over 55 percent of the country’s GDP. 3<br />
70. Infrastructure development in most Indian cities is not keeping pace with the increase in<br />
travel demand. Indeed, the growth of vehicles in the streets has been far greater than the growth<br />
in the street network; as a result the main arteries face capacity saturation. Between 1951 and<br />
2004 at national level, the motor vehicle fleet grew at a compound annual growth rate of close to<br />
11 per cent compared to an average rate of 3.6 per cent in the total road length. Within this total<br />
priority was given to rural roads; national highways grew by only 2.3 per cent 4 . As a direct<br />
consequence of urbanization and the lag in responding, roads have become ever more congested,<br />
travel speeds have decreased and travel times have become longer. Energy is wasted and<br />
pollution gets worse.<br />
71. The railway network is suffering an equally acute shortage of capacity. At national level,<br />
from 1951 to 2008 the network was lengthened by only 18 percent (in route-km), while the<br />
number of passengers carried tripled and people traveled further, so that the number of<br />
passenger-km multiplied by 10 5 . Suburban rail and Metro account for a large part of this increase<br />
in traffic. Suburban rail use increased sharply as the number of passenger-km grew 18-fold over<br />
the same period from 1951 to 2008, with a doubling between 1991 and 2008 (Figure 1).<br />
150000<br />
100000<br />
50000<br />
0<br />
Figure 1. Growth in Suburban Rail Travel in Indian Cities, 1951-2001<br />
(in millions of passenger-km)<br />
6551 11770<br />
22984<br />
41086<br />
59578<br />
88872<br />
119842<br />
1950-51 1960-61 1970-71 1980-81 1990-91 2000-01 2007-08<br />
Source: Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s 2009.<br />
3 UNDP. “India: Urban Poverty Report 2009.” http://www.undp.org.in/content/pub/PovertyReduction/INDIA-<br />
URBAN-POVERTY-REPORT-2009.pdf<br />
4 Transport Research Wing, “Road Transport Yearbook 2006-07”, Government of India<br />
5 Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s of India. Statistical Summary – Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s: 1950-2007.<br />
19
<strong>Mumbai</strong>’s Contribution to National Economy<br />
72. The <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region (MMR), with a population of nearly 18 million in<br />
2001 6 , is the sixth largest metropolitan area in the world. <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s primacy in India’s economic<br />
well-being cannot be over-estimated. As the financial and commercial capital of India and the<br />
most prominent gateway to the country, <strong>Mumbai</strong>‘s economy is of critical importance for a<br />
variety of strategic reasons. It has the largest GDP of any Indian city, followed by the national<br />
capital region Delhi, Kolkata and Chennai. In FY 2004-05, MMR contributed 40 percent to the<br />
total Maharashtra State GDP 7 , and in FY2006-07 <strong>Mumbai</strong> contributed 6.2 percent of national<br />
GDP 8 . It accounts for 33 percent of India’s income tax collections, 60 percent of its customs duty<br />
collections, 20 percent of central excise tax collections, 40 percent of port trade and 60 percent of<br />
stock exchange trading 9 . As the subcontinent’s largest port, <strong>Mumbai</strong> handles 30 percent of<br />
India's exports and imports 10 .<br />
73. While manufacturing’s share in the Indian economy has declined over the last decade, the<br />
service sector has emerged as the growth driver, offering financial services, information<br />
technology (IT) and information-technology-enabled services, media and entertainment,<br />
hospitality and tourism. <strong>Mumbai</strong> is pre-eminent in these industries and now accounts for 11<br />
percent of India's total employment and 20 percent of its employment in industry 11 .<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> Transportation<br />
74. <strong>Mumbai</strong> has an extensive rail and bus system, and public transport is used for three out of<br />
every four motorized trips in Greater <strong>Mumbai</strong>, with rail being the dominant mode (Figure 2).<br />
The <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban <strong>Railway</strong> system, part of the Region’s public transportation system, is<br />
operated by two of India <strong>Railway</strong>’s zonal railways, WR and CR, which run the two largest and<br />
busiest networks among IR’s 16 zones 12 .<br />
75. The Western line runs northwards from Churchgate terminus station in Island City and<br />
serves suburban passengers living along the west coast towards Ahmedabad and Delhi. The WR<br />
operates 1,106 scheduled suburban train roundtrips per weekday over 124 route-km between<br />
Churchgate and Virar, including six trains between <strong>Mumbai</strong> Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus (CST)<br />
and Borivali. This requires a working fleet of 25 nine-car train sets, 48 twelve-car train sets and<br />
one fifteen-car one.<br />
76. The CR runs from <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST station located very close to Churchgate in Island City<br />
and serves a large part of central India to the east of <strong>Mumbai</strong>. The CR operates 1,464 scheduled<br />
6 Census of India, 2001.<br />
7 LEA Associates South Asia, “Comprehensive Transportation Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Area” (CTS),<br />
MMRDA, April 2008.<br />
8 http://www.financialexpress.com/news/gdp-growth-surat-fastest-mumbai-largest/266636/<br />
9 MRVC. “<strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban <strong>Railway</strong> System.” Presentation. March 2007.<br />
10 Business Melbourne. “City Profile: <strong>Mumbai</strong>.” July 2004. Prepared by Sustainable Business and Trade<br />
Development. https://www.businessmelbourne.com.au/docs/active/doc1044.pdf<br />
11 Source: Ibidem. The term industry here refers to the secondary sector, including: textiles, pharmecuticals,<br />
construction, engineering, metals, petroleum, silks, glassware, and printing. Before the industrial growth following<br />
<strong>World</strong> War II, India’s economy used to rely mainly on manufactured goods, of which <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s textiles have<br />
always represented an important share.<br />
12 Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s operate both long-distance and suburban rail systems.<br />
20
suburban train roundtrips per weekday over 280 route-km from <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST northeast-wards to<br />
Kotputari, southeast-wards to Khopoli and to Panvel via Mankhurd, Andheri on the Western<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> and between Thane and Vashi via Ghansoli. This requires an operating fleet of 60 ninecar<br />
train sets and 50 twelve-car sets. 13 The annual growth rate of rail passengers on CR is 2.6<br />
percent and on WR 0.7 percent.<br />
Figure 2. Modal Split in <strong>Mumbai</strong> in 2008<br />
Taxi/Ric<br />
kshaw<br />
9%<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> Modal Split by No. of Trips - No<br />
Walk<br />
Two Car 7%<br />
Wheeler<br />
7%<br />
Cycle<br />
3%<br />
Train<br />
51%<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> Modal Split by Person*km - No Walk<br />
Taxi/Rick<br />
shaw 3%<br />
Bus 10%<br />
Two<br />
Wheeler<br />
3%<br />
Car 5% Cycle 1%<br />
Bus 23%<br />
Train<br />
78%<br />
Source: Comprehensive Transportation Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region, LEA Associates, April 2008<br />
Quality of Suburban <strong>Railway</strong> Services<br />
77. Because of its extensive reach across the metropolitan region and its intensive use by the<br />
local population, the suburban railway has been suffering severe overcrowding, which has grown<br />
to be a major issue. The very poor travel conditions for rail commuters are incompatible with the<br />
objectives of <strong>Mumbai</strong> to become a world-class city with an acceptable level of comfort,<br />
convenience and safety. In 2007-08 an estimated 6.8 million passengers daily 14 traveled on the<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban railway (2.5 billion trips annually), which makes the suburban rail system the<br />
lifeline of <strong>Mumbai</strong>. At peak hour, the average frequency for train services is a very reasonable 16<br />
trains per hour (a train every four minutes). One of the attributes of this suburban rail network is<br />
low fares compared to other public transport systems. However, this comes at the price of<br />
overcrowding - one of the most acute in the world, with about 5,000 passengers traveling in a<br />
nine-car train as against a rated carrying capacity of 1,700. This translates into a density of up to<br />
16 people per square meter in Second Class General coaches (officially referred to as ‘superdense<br />
crush load’ by the Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s when specifically referring to the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban<br />
system), as measured in the 2008 TranSforM Comprehensive Transportation Study for MMR.<br />
Overcrowding also severely slows down train speeds. While the recently introduced AC/DC<br />
13 <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region Development Authority. “Comprehensive Transportation Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />
Metropolitan Region.” April 2008. LEA International <strong>Ltd</strong>., Canada, in joint venture with LEA Associates South<br />
Asia Pvt. <strong>Ltd</strong>., India. Updated by MRVC by e-mail on January 21, 2010.<br />
14 Number of one-way trips per day.<br />
21
EMU trains are capable of 100 km/h under light traffic conditions, the actual average speed of<br />
the trains is a mere 35 km/h on most lines, the cumulative effect of several factors. 15<br />
78. Due to the overcrowding, doors of coaches cannot be closed and passengers dangle<br />
outside from the open doors. Nearby squatter settlements and encroachers within the railway<br />
right-of-way safety zone are other causes of frequent casualties on the <strong>Mumbai</strong> system. Stations<br />
are always overcrowded. People rarely use proper crossing places and prefer trespassing and<br />
crossing the rail lines. Trespassing, which occurs not only in the station areas but also in between<br />
them, forces trains to slow down and so increases travel times, limits capacity and hampers track<br />
maintenance work. Deaths of squatters and trespassers after being struck by a train and<br />
passengers falling off trains are a daily occurrence. There are about ten to twelve 16 deaths per<br />
day on the <strong>Mumbai</strong> rail system (which is high but still less than the rate of five to seven 17 deaths<br />
per day on the roads and streets in the MMR 18 , considering the far greater volumes carried by<br />
rail). Table 1 below shows the gravity of this issue: the numbers of deaths and injuries have<br />
grown at yearly rates of 3.3 and 5.6 percent respectively from 2001 to 2008, with an annual<br />
average growth of 4.4 percent for the total number of casualties. Among the causes of death and<br />
injury, the continued increase in the number of passengers falling off the train is particularly<br />
noteworthy (this increase is in part due to the increase in the number of trains and the opening of<br />
new lines). Reducing the number of fatalities related to its suburban rail services is one of the<br />
priorities of Western <strong>Railway</strong>, Central <strong>Railway</strong> and MRVC, which in November 2009 decided to<br />
prepare an action plan on how to effectively reduce the casualties among trespassers.<br />
Table 1. <strong>Railway</strong> Accidents in <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region, year by year<br />
2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />
Accidental Deaths<br />
While crossing the railway line 1,971 2,517 2,479 2,561 2,603 2,448<br />
Falling off the train 603 453 494 606 647 615<br />
Others* 142 85 705 862 747 719<br />
Total Accidental Deaths 2,885 3,055 3,678 4,029 3,997 3,782<br />
Injured Persons<br />
While crossing the railway line 1,147 856 810 1,040 1,048 916<br />
Falling off the train 1,454 1,420 1,639 1,898 2,033 1,854<br />
Others 144 657 1,064 1,195 1,226 1,260<br />
Total Injured Persons 2,745 2,933 3,513 4,133 4,307 4,030<br />
Total Casualties 5,760 6,227 7,191 8,162 8,304 7,812<br />
Source: <strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Police Commissionerate, 2007<br />
* Other causes of accidents include: falling off the platform, derailments, bridge collapses<br />
15 LEA Associates, Comprehensive Transportation Study.<br />
16 This amounts to 6.9 deaths per 100 million passenger-km (total suburban rail passenger traffic based on<br />
LEA Associates’ estimate is 173 million passenger-km/day in 2006).<br />
17 This amounts to 11.2 deaths per 100 million passenger-km (total road traffic including non-mechanized trips<br />
based on LEA Associates’ estimate is 62.5 million passenger-km/day in 2006).<br />
18 Basic Transport and Communication Statistics for MMR, March 2005, by MMRDA and Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />
22
<strong>Mumbai</strong> Rail and Urban Poverty<br />
79. Commuting to work accounts for two-thirds of all trips in the <strong>Mumbai</strong> metropolitan<br />
region –when weighted by the distance traveled. Many people still walk, but for distances of<br />
more than 1-2 km motorized travel is a must. Suburban rail is the backbone of such commuting<br />
trips, accounting for half of all non-walking trips and nearly 80 percent of the non-walking<br />
distance traveled (see Figure 2). Rail is consistently the preferred motorized mode of transport<br />
across all income groups.<br />
80. For low-income commuters the cost of transport is the major consideration. For very lowincome<br />
commuters walking is often the only affordable alternative. Thus, the urban poor rely<br />
heavily on walking (61 percent for commuters in households earning less than Rs. 5,000 -<br />
US$100- per month), and in general the poor use less motorized transit (including rail) than<br />
higher-income groups. However, this income group also often chooses to take rail for long<br />
distances (5 km or more) and as much as one in four low-income commuters who live in certain<br />
zones take rail to work. These commuters will therefore, even in the short run, benefit from<br />
improvements in transit service and/or fares.<br />
81. Middle-income and low-income users above extreme poverty are the prime customers for<br />
rail transit, as the fares are lower than for bus transit, and buying and maintaining a car is beyond<br />
the means of a large number of households. “The cost per km of traveling by rail is also much<br />
cheaper than the cost of bus service or other public transport, especially if a monthly pass is<br />
purchased. For example, a worker with a commute of 20 km each way would pay only Rs. 90 per<br />
month to commute by rail—less than Rs. 4 (10 US¢) per day. The cost per day of commuting 20<br />
km via bus is, by contrast, Rs. 20”. 19<br />
82. Finally, the future strategy for MMR proposed in the TranSforM study also underlines<br />
that “the extension of suburban rail will ensure that distances are minimized and access to<br />
livelihoods, education and other social needs, especially for the marginal segments of the urban<br />
population, is improved.”<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> Rail and Air Quality<br />
83. The rapid pace of urbanization and probable acceleration of motorization trends in MMR<br />
present a threat to ambient air quality, which is already a major health issue in most urban areas<br />
in India. Indeed, the concentration of respirable particulate matter (RSPM) 20 in <strong>Mumbai</strong> has<br />
increased by 53 percent from 2006 to 2008, mainly due to the 45 percent increase in the number<br />
of registered vehicles from 2003 to 2008. The Central Pollution Control Board’s National<br />
Ambient Air Quality Status Report for 2008 underlines that the RSPM levels in <strong>Mumbai</strong> are<br />
“alarming”. The RSPM concentration in MMR in 2008 was 132 μg/m3. The <strong>World</strong> Health<br />
Organization considers levels above 120 μg/m3 to be “high”, the second highest category right<br />
19 Cropper et al., Urban Poverty and Transport: The Case of <strong>Mumbai</strong>, <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Working Paper 2005.<br />
20 Particles produced by vehicle exhaust, burning of fuel and garbage, industrial sources, and re-suspension of dust.<br />
23
elow “critical”. Although sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) and nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) levels are still within<br />
reasonable limits 21 , current motorization trends are not environmentally sustainable. 22<br />
84. “In <strong>Mumbai</strong> the main contributor of air pollution is the transport sector, followed by<br />
power plants, industrial units and the burning of garbage.” 23 Irrespective of improvements in<br />
engines and fuel type, ambient air quality is bound to further deteriorate because of the<br />
motorization rate if no compensatory action is taken. Understanding the need for a sustainable<br />
urban development strategy, in 2004 MMRDA retained the National Environmental Engineering<br />
Research Institute to prepare strategies and an action plan for particulate matter reduction in<br />
MMR. The study included assessment of ambient air quality status (especially for particulate<br />
matter PM10), the development of reduction and mitigation strategies, and a reduction action<br />
plan.<br />
85. Developing suburban rail use would contribute to the efforts being made in India as well<br />
as in other countries to reduce GHG emissions. MUTP-2A aims at expanding an energy-efficient<br />
public transport system and minimizing motor vehicle use, the main source of pollution. Indeed,<br />
as presented in Annex 9, expanding the rail network capacity will likely lead to a diversion of<br />
passengers from bus services. This reduction in bus operations will in turn contribute to reducing<br />
pollution, because EMU trains emit very limited pollutant quantities, whereas buses emit NO 2<br />
and SO 2 at a rate of 0.25 kg per bus per hour.<br />
86. Finally, the conversion from DC to AC will allow the use of more energy-efficient trains,<br />
thus further decreasing CO 2 emissions and allowing MRVC to claim carbon credits. The energy<br />
saving per year due to the trains already introduced at this point is estimated at 6.2 million kWh,<br />
and this allows for a generation of carbon credits equivalent to 62.6 thousand tCO 2 e 24 per year. 25<br />
Long-term Transportation Strategy for MMR<br />
87. Within the next 25 years, <strong>Mumbai</strong> is projected to overtake Tokyo and become the largest<br />
urban region in the world, in a country having one of the fastest expanding global economies. In<br />
2004, a task force appointed by the Chief Minister of Maharashtra conducted a comprehensive<br />
transportation study for the metropolitan region known widely by the acronym TranSforM (for<br />
21 The concentrations in SO 2 and NO 2 are 9 μg/m 3 and 42 μg/m 3 in 2008 respectively. Both levels are currently<br />
labeled as “low” (between 0 and 40 μg/m 3 ).<br />
22 “According to a study carried out by EMBARQ in cooperation with the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> in 2007, continuation of the<br />
rapid motorization trends without adequate policy and technological interventions (the “business-as-usual” scenario)<br />
would increase the annual national CO 2 emissions from urban transport sector (in all major cities) to 254 million<br />
tons of CO 2 in 2030, which is more than nine times the emissions level in 2005.” (Project Appraisal <strong>Document</strong>,<br />
Sustainable Urban Transport Project, <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> 2009).<br />
23 Larssen et al., URBAIR Urban Air Quality Management Strategy in Asia: Greater <strong>Mumbai</strong> Report, <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong><br />
1997.<br />
24 tCO2e: Tons of CO 2 equivalent is a measure for describing how much global warming a given type and amount of<br />
greenhouse gas may cause, using the functionally equivalent amount of carbon dioxide as reference.<br />
25 MRVC Letter to <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> dated May 16, 2008 regarding Generation of Carbon Credits on account of energy<br />
saving due to DC/AC conversion on <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban section of CR WR under MUTP 1 and 2.<br />
24
“Transportation Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong>”). 26 Its vision statement is: “Transforming <strong>Mumbai</strong> into a<br />
world-class metropolis with a vibrant economy and globally comparable quality of life for its<br />
citizens”.<br />
88. One of the Vision’s several goals is for the MMR to become an important logistic and<br />
export hub through synergy between ports, airports and special economic zones. Moreover, it<br />
also aims at guaranteeing to all MMR citizens access to public transport, in addition to other<br />
basic civic services: safe drinking water, sanitation, education, health care and recreation<br />
facilities. A key long-term transportation strategy is “to achieve balanced, integrated and<br />
sustainable public/private transportation systems to meet the aspirations of the public for<br />
freedom and convenience of travel.” 27<br />
89. The transport network recommended by the TranSforM study includes a dominant role<br />
for suburban rail. The current strategy is for it to remain the backbone of commuting trips in the<br />
MMR in the medium term. A certain decrease in suburban rail’s modal share due to diversion of<br />
trips to new metro lines is expected. 28 However, if the strategic guidelines of TranSforM are<br />
carried out, the forecast sustainable modal split still sees suburban rail as the dominant mode, as<br />
shown in Figure 3. Indeed, the proposed future strategy for the region relies heavily on an<br />
extensive expansion of the rail-based transit system. This is reflected in the very large planned<br />
investment in suburban rail by 2031: Rs. 315 billion (nearly US$7 billion), the second largest<br />
investment after the metro system (Rs. 922 billion). 29<br />
Figure 3. Modal Split in <strong>Mumbai</strong> in 2005 and as per TranSforM strategy in 2016<br />
Train,<br />
53.3%<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> Modal Split by No. of Trips - No<br />
Walk 2005<br />
Metro,<br />
0.0%<br />
Car,<br />
4.9% Two-<br />
Wheeler,<br />
7.9%<br />
Auto,<br />
7.4%<br />
Bus,<br />
24.9%<br />
Taxi,<br />
1.6%<br />
Strategic <strong>Mumbai</strong> Modal Split by No. of<br />
Trips - No Walk 2016<br />
Metro,<br />
30.7%<br />
Train,<br />
33.5%<br />
Car,<br />
8.6%<br />
Two-<br />
Wheeler,<br />
11.3%<br />
Auto,<br />
4.7%<br />
Taxi,<br />
1.4%<br />
Bus,<br />
9.9%<br />
Source: Comprehensive Transportation Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region, LEA Associates, April 2008<br />
26 <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region Development Authority. “Comprehensive Transportation Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />
Metropolitan Region.” April 2008. LEA International <strong>Ltd</strong>., Canada, in joint venture with LEA Associates South<br />
Asia Pvt. <strong>Ltd</strong>., India.<br />
27 Ibidem.<br />
28 This is due to the fact that connectivity by the metro network will be extensive and that metro stations are to be<br />
spaced at 1-km intervals.<br />
29 By comparison, investment in freeways and roads is only forecast at Rs. 267 billion and in buses at Rs.43 billion.<br />
25
Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s’ Development Strategy<br />
90. Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s, with 63,221 route-km of network and 1.42 million employees, is one of<br />
the largest rail networks of the world. It constitutes the lifeline and the mainstay of the country’s<br />
transport infrastructure. Over the last few years, IR has achieved a dramatic re-invention of its<br />
business and is presently witnessing one of the most impressive and unprecedented expansions in<br />
its history. During the last few years the freight traffic on IR has been growing at 9.4 percent and<br />
passenger traffic at 7.4 percent, and revenue has grown even faster. This is in sharp contrast to<br />
the historical trend rates of growth at 3-4 percent per year. In the passenger segment, while<br />
affordability continues to underpin the pricing for second-class passengers, there has been<br />
reduction in fares for passengers in air-conditioned class and those traveling short distance.<br />
These measures have redefined the transport scene in the country and transformed the railways<br />
as a competitive and viable alternative to road transport. By 2012, IR is projected to handle 25<br />
percent more passengers than handled in 2008.<br />
91. During the past five years, IR has achieved commendable results by substantially<br />
increasing the volume of traffic carried and its profits. However, it now faces several new<br />
challenges. The recent increase in the wage bill, accompanied by a downturn in economic growth<br />
in 2009, have already affected IR’s bottom line adversely. In addition, the planned large<br />
investment in Dedicated Freight Corridors (DFC) in the medium term will create excess capacity<br />
in its start-up years that will reduce IR’s profits unless it develops marketing strategies to rapidly<br />
attract new traffic to the existing corridors (mainly passengers), as well as to the new dedicated<br />
freight corridors.<br />
92. Going forward, the expected continued economic growth of India over the next 20 years<br />
at eight percent or more will impose new challenges on IR in respect of capacity, transportation<br />
and logistic products and service quality to be expected by rail customers in freight as well as<br />
passenger services. It is foreseen that the customer’s profile will undergo a significant change, as<br />
an average rail customer is expected to experience a four-to-five fold increase in income and at<br />
the same time will demand more comfortable and faster travel. Customers will be willing to pay<br />
higher fares for these improved services. These challenges can be addressed effectively by<br />
implementing Vision 2020 for IR. An immediate next step would be to develop a credible<br />
financing plan to effectively underpin IR’s developmental plans.<br />
93. Another important step is to develop an action plan (road map) that lays out specific<br />
strategies and measures to be implemented to overcome the present constraints and, more<br />
importantly, to enable IR to satisfactorily support the growing economy by increasing capacity<br />
and improving service quality. IR needs to prioritize actions and investments over the next ten<br />
years and set out an implementation schedule. It will also attempt to identify funding sources for<br />
the recommended investments.<br />
Management of MMR<br />
94. Responsibilities for the general direction of urban development and urban transport rest<br />
with the State Government of Maharashtra (GOM) through the <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region<br />
Development Authority (MMRDA), a regional developmental agency under the Department of<br />
Urban Development. To enable the <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban <strong>Railway</strong> to meet the demands of the ever-<br />
26
growing passenger traffic, the Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s and GOM jointly established <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />
<strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> Limited (MRVC) in 1999 with the mission to develop world-class<br />
infrastructure for an efficient, safe and sustainable railway system in <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s suburban section,<br />
to provide comfortable and friendly train services to commuters. Its objectives included to: (i)<br />
integrate suburban rail capacity enhancement plans with the urban development plan for <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />
and propose investments, (ii) implement rail infrastructure projects in <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s suburban areas,<br />
(iii) commercially develop railway land and airspace in <strong>Mumbai</strong> to raise funds for suburban<br />
railway development, (iv) resettle and rehabilitate project-affected households and (v) to be an<br />
infrastructure company committed to sustainable development and environment friendly<br />
construction in <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban section.<br />
95. In 2009 a first step was taken through the decision that metropolitan planning should be<br />
done by a “Metropolitan Planning Committee” (MPC). District planning committees also exist<br />
whose task is to plan for each district within the Region, but it is not yet clear how they should<br />
coordinate with MPC or MMRDA. Further institutional strengthening of the coordinating role of<br />
MMRDA or the creation of a separate Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority is currently<br />
under consideration.<br />
96. Funding arrangements for urban transport infrastructure and services in <strong>Mumbai</strong> are split<br />
between a number of national, state and local government agencies. No single agency has the<br />
role or responsibility for preparing integrated investment and operations budgets which meet<br />
travel demands and policy objectives, optimize the use of scarce resources, and are affordable.<br />
Public investment has been lagging behind demand, most notably on the railways, while on the<br />
roads maintenance expenditure is about half what is needed to keep them in good condition.<br />
Since the planning and provision of suburban rail services is IR’s responsibility, MMRDA has<br />
little influence over them. The allocation of resources for rail services is subject to the approval<br />
of the (national) Planning Commission and IR. The Western <strong>Railway</strong> and Central <strong>Railway</strong><br />
operating within the metropolitan region are independent agencies of IR, with their own lines<br />
and no integration of services.<br />
MUTP-1 Accomplishments and Potential Benefits of MUTP-2A<br />
97. In early 2000 MUTP-1 was launched to address issues pertaining to (i) the inadequate<br />
capacity and low speed of rail services and contentious resettlement and rehabilitation (including<br />
land acquisition); (ii) limited East-West connectivity, poor traffic management, and road safety;<br />
and (iii) inadequate bus services and road maintenance, pollution from motor vehicles, limited<br />
involvement of stakeholders, institutional weaknesses and inadequate funding. In June 2002 the<br />
<strong>Bank</strong> approved Loan 4665-IN and Credit 3662-IN to finance the project, which became effective<br />
in November 2002. Because its components concern different sub-sectors, the project has six<br />
implementing agencies, including MRVC for the rail transport component. MMRDA is the<br />
coordinating agency and is responsible for carrying out the resettlement and rehabilitation<br />
component on behalf of all the implementing agencies.<br />
98. The rail component aims to improve the capacity and performance of the suburban<br />
rail system through service efficiency improvements (increasing existing track capacity,<br />
converting from DC to AC, and improving electrical, signaling and telecommunication systems),<br />
procuring new rolling stock and upgrading existing rolling stock, and expanding network<br />
27
capacity. The component also supports studies and technical assistance, among other things, to<br />
improve Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s capabilities for track and rolling stock maintenance, financial<br />
management and control systems, railway safety and quality assurance.<br />
99. Since its start the project has made significant progress towards achieving its<br />
development objectives. As a result of the resettlement of squatters along rail tracks and the<br />
completion of track doubling on the Western <strong>Railway</strong> corridor, the efficiency of suburban train<br />
operations has increased, with a rise in its peak-time capacity by 7-10 percent and a reduction in<br />
commuting time by four to nine minutes for about six million daily passengers. An improvement<br />
in transport services in terms of quality and comfort is noticed as a result of the addition of a few<br />
new trains and the replacement of 644 buses by new ones. However, improvements in traffic<br />
management technical capacity within the Municipal <strong>Corporation</strong> of Greater <strong>Mumbai</strong> need to be<br />
further strengthened and sustained.<br />
100. Up to March 2010, 84 twelve-car rakes of new EMU trains (equivalent to 108<br />
nine-car rakes) were put into service. Of these 84 rakes, 51 were financed by the <strong>Bank</strong> and<br />
procured by MRVC, while the other 33 rakes were funded and procured by Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s on<br />
their own. Together, they have reduced crowding in the system from 500 people per coach ppdpk<br />
to 450, despite a net increase in passengers. It is expected that once all additional 72 <strong>Bank</strong>financed<br />
twelve-car trains (equivalent to 96 nine-car trains) are in service, crowding will be<br />
reduced to 350 ppdpk, i.e. 30 percent less than the original density --but still twice the rated<br />
carrying capacity.<br />
101. Through the preparation of MUTP-1 a partnership was created between the GOM<br />
and IR for developing <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s suburban rail system, and it was institutionalized by the<br />
creation of MRVC. MRVC as an implementing agency has proven to be an efficient tool, and<br />
attests to the success of this partnership. Prior to MUTP-1 the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban system suffered<br />
due to lack of investment in renewal of aging assets as well as expansion to meet the everincreasing<br />
demand, as IR had much greater interest in main line services on a national scale. The<br />
partnership between GOM and IR has been considered positive enough to continue for the<br />
preparation and implementation of MUTP-2A. And MRVC has gained professionalism in project<br />
implementation, coordinating effectively with both the GOM and the various departments of IR.<br />
Its increased efficiency has resulted in MRVC being commissioned for other studies to develop<br />
suburban rail services in <strong>Mumbai</strong>.<br />
102. Through MUTP-1 MMRDA has gained experience and capacity in handling<br />
resettlement of large numbers of people. This project has been a first for <strong>Mumbai</strong> and a first for<br />
the <strong>Bank</strong> to handle resettlement of so many people in an urban setting. During implementation,<br />
difficulties occurred in handling the resettlement. A <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Inspection Panel investigated<br />
the project’s resettlement process and raised concerns about implementation issues, including the<br />
way medium and large shopkeepers were resettled, the quality of the baseline survey of projectaffected<br />
people, management of post-resettlement activities, grievance redressal processes, and<br />
project supervision. The implementation by GOM of a remedial action plan, with the active<br />
support of the <strong>Bank</strong>, resulted in a much improved quality of the resettlement and rehabilitation<br />
process. MMRDA evolved towards a problem-solving approach for resettlement, exploring<br />
negotiated solutions as often as possible. The experience gained by MMRDA thereby is now<br />
used by the <strong>Bank</strong> as an example for other large cities with similar challenges.<br />
28
103. Further capacity will be needed to meet the future growth in demand. The<br />
population in areas of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region served by suburban railway is expected<br />
to grow at 1.8 percent per year for the next decade, boosting the demand for suburban rail<br />
services and the need to increase capacity commensurately. The comprehensive transport study<br />
carried out under MUTP-1 (paragraph 88 above) recommended such an increase as a priority.<br />
This need was already foreseen at the time MUTP-1 was prepared and the genesis of MUTP-2A<br />
lies in MUTP-1, one of the key objectives of which was to address the overcrowding on<br />
suburban trains. The size of MUTP-1 was limited because funding was insufficient then to<br />
finance all the EMU coaches needed for full use of the infrastructure created under the project.<br />
By the end of MUTP-1, the suburban rail system will have 2,260 EMU coaches. Based on<br />
simulation modeling of the time table, the total number of EMU coaches can increase to 3,124 to<br />
reach full use of today’s infrastructure. The additional 864 EMU coaches (72 twelve-car trains)<br />
to be financed under MUTP-2A will bring the fleet up to this full capacity. The demand will still<br />
be in excess of the supply, but this additional transport capacity will further reduce the<br />
overcrowding in suburban trains.<br />
104. The project will provide several categories of local benefits for commuters, such as (i)<br />
reduced travel time, (ii) improved travel comfort, and (iii) health improvements, with a focus on<br />
benefitting the poor for whom the rail represents an especially important mode of transport. The<br />
more frequent service will reduce waiting times, while shorter travel times will flow from the<br />
higher maximum speed potential of the upgraded rolling stock. The reduced passenger waiting<br />
time has been assessed as half a minute per trip on completion of MUTP-1 and as one minute per<br />
trip on completion of both MUTP-1 and MUTP-2A. The average saving in total journey time<br />
would amount to as much as two to six minutes per trip depending on the corridor. Using a train<br />
design similar to the one developed for MUTP-1, an improved suspension system and better<br />
lighting in the trains will provide greater comfort. The improved air ventilation system will have<br />
a positive impact on commuters’ health.<br />
105. The 1,500V DC traction power system incurs significant energy losses. These will be<br />
considerably reduced with the completion of conversion of all lines to 25KV AC traction power.<br />
The conversion will permit running of more services and conversion of nine-car trains to twelvecar<br />
trains. The conversion also promises several other benefits:<br />
(a) Supplying higher levels of power through high-capacity traction substations makes it<br />
possible to run longer trains as well as more trains per hour during the peak period.<br />
(b) The greater power available to trains enables them to accelerate faster and operate at<br />
higher speed, shortening journey times.<br />
(c) A three-phase propulsion system on the new EMU rakes, using modern Integrated Gate<br />
Bipolar Technology, allows regenerative braking, which sends energy back into the wire.<br />
106. In carrying out MUTP-1 MRVC has gained a recognized expertise in managing a<br />
challenging suburban rail development project that required professional expertise in technical<br />
disciplines as well as in interagency coordination and communication. During the last two years<br />
MRVC and its key personnel have earned several national and international awards in these<br />
disciplines. MRVC has also recognized the importance of a comprehensive systems approach for<br />
29
environmental management and social management, and during the preparation of MUTP-2A it<br />
has earned its certification to ISO 14001:2004 and ISO 18001:2004. This second project will<br />
facilitate the continuation of the capacity building effort provided by the <strong>Bank</strong> team during<br />
MUTP-1. The on-going interaction with the <strong>Bank</strong> exposes MRVC and the zonal railways<br />
operating the system to international good practice and emerging ideas. A set of studies will<br />
advise MRVC on specific key topics.<br />
30
Annex 2: Major Related Projects Financed by the <strong>Bank</strong> and/or other Agencies<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
Issue Project Latest Supervision<br />
Ratings<br />
<strong>Bank</strong>-financed, completed or on-going<br />
Implementation PDO<br />
Progress<br />
Capacity expansion of commuter rails, urban <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project MS MS<br />
roads and bus services, and institutional<br />
strengthening of concerned agencies<br />
Capacity expansion of national highways and Allahabad Bypass Project (Ln.4719-IN) Completed S<br />
institutional strengthening of MOSRTH and<br />
NHAI<br />
Lucknow Muzaffarpur National Highway<br />
Project (Ln. 4764-IN)<br />
U<br />
U<br />
Capacity expansion and maintenance of state<br />
highways and institutional development of state<br />
road agencies<br />
Improvements of road infrastructure in a<br />
commercial format<br />
Andhra Pradesh State Highway Project (Ln.<br />
2490-IN)<br />
Completed<br />
Gujarat State Highway Project (Ln.4577-IN) Completed S<br />
Karnataka State Highways Improvement Project<br />
(Ln.4606-IN)<br />
Completed<br />
Kerala State Transport Project (Ln.4563-IN) MU MS<br />
Mizoram State Roads Project (Ln.3618-IN) MS MS<br />
Uttar Pradesh State Roads Project (Ln.4685-IN) S MS<br />
Tamil Nadu Road Sector Project (Ln.4706-IN) S S<br />
Himachal Pradesh State Roads Project<br />
(Ln.4860-IN)<br />
Punjab State Road Project (Ln. S S<br />
Orissa State Road Project (Ln. S S<br />
Support to Infrastructure Leasing and<br />
Financial Services (Ln.3992-IN; Cr.2838-<br />
IN)<br />
MS<br />
S<br />
S<br />
MS<br />
Municipal reforms and investments (including<br />
improvements of urban road infrastructure)<br />
Improvements of urban transport infrastructure<br />
Promotion of public/non-motorized transport and<br />
urban transport capacity building<br />
Other development agencies, completed, ongoing and planned<br />
Japanese <strong>Bank</strong> for International Cooperation<br />
(formerly OECF) - Capacity expansion of Urban<br />
Transport<br />
ADB - TA for Urban Transport<br />
ADB - Capacity expansion of NH and SH and<br />
institutional strengthening of agencies<br />
Karnataka Municipal Services Project (Ln.<br />
4818-IN)<br />
Tamil Nadu Urban Development Project<br />
(Ln.4798-IN)<br />
Sustainable Urban Transport Project (SUTP)<br />
(Project ID P100589)<br />
Delhi Metro Rail Project<br />
Development of national urban transport<br />
guidance and identification and preparation<br />
of a Urban Transport investment project<br />
National Highway Corridor I, Surat-Manor<br />
Tollway Project, Chattisgarh State Roads<br />
Project, National Highway Corridor II, MP<br />
State Roads Project<br />
Effective<br />
On going<br />
On going<br />
On going<br />
31
ADB- Improvements of urban roads in major<br />
Kerala cities<br />
UNDP- Capacity development for national and<br />
local governments<br />
Kerala Sustainable Urban Development<br />
Project<br />
India capacity development program<br />
Ratings: HS (Highly Satisfactory), S (Satisfactory), MS (Moderately Satisfactory), U (Unsatisfactory), MU<br />
(Moderately Unsatisfactory), HU (Highly Unsatisfactory)<br />
On going<br />
On going<br />
32
Annex 3: Results Framework and Monitoring<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
Results Framework<br />
PDO Project Outcome Indicators Use of Project Outcome<br />
Information<br />
To improve the passenger carrying<br />
capacity, operational efficiency,<br />
1. Additional capacity - Vehicle km per day during<br />
morning peak hours (8.30-11.30 a.m.)<br />
To assess the project’s<br />
contribution to the PDO<br />
level of comfort of, and the<br />
institutional capacity of entities<br />
2. Reduction in peak hour overcrowding – average<br />
number of passengers per 12-car train<br />
involved in, the suburban rail system<br />
of <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan area.<br />
3. Reduction in journey times – average transit<br />
times in minutes<br />
4. Reduction in energy consumption – average<br />
energy consumption per 12-car train-km<br />
(kWh/t/km)<br />
5. Action plan on trespassing and safety prepared<br />
6. Action plan on revenue improvement prepared<br />
Intermediate Outcomes Intermediate Outcome Indicators Use of Intermediate<br />
1. Train operation performance 1.1. Trains per hour<br />
1.2. Length of trains<br />
1.3. EMU 12-car trains in service (258 trains)<br />
1.4. Ridership per day<br />
1.5. Punctuality – percentage of trains reaching less<br />
than five minutes late to destination<br />
2. Infrastructure and equipment 2.1. DC to AC conversion (1577 TKM)<br />
2.2. Additional Track (181 TKM)<br />
3. Institutional development and<br />
capacity building<br />
3.1. Study on potential for ISO 14001 at CR and<br />
WR completed<br />
3.2. Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban development plan<br />
completed<br />
3.3. TA for IR strategy carried out<br />
3.4. Continued MRVC ISO Certification<br />
Outcome Monitoring<br />
To assess the performance of the<br />
project and to redirect it, if<br />
necessary, to achieve the PDO<br />
33
Project Outcome Indicators<br />
1. Vehicle km per day during<br />
morning peak hours (8-11<br />
a.m.)<br />
2. Reduction in overcrowding<br />
(passengers per 12-car<br />
train)<br />
3. Reduction in journey times –<br />
transit times in minutes<br />
reduced<br />
4. Average energy consumption<br />
per 12-car train-km<br />
(kWh/t/km)<br />
5. Action plan on trespassing<br />
and safety prepared<br />
6. Action plan on revenue<br />
improvement prepared<br />
Intermediate Outcome Indicators<br />
1.1. Trains per hour during peak<br />
hour<br />
1.2. Length of trains ( percent of<br />
12-car trains)<br />
1.3. EMU Fleet size (12-car<br />
rakes in service)<br />
Comment<br />
Corridor:<br />
WR<br />
CR (ML)<br />
CR (Harbor)<br />
Corridor:<br />
WR<br />
CR<br />
Harbor<br />
WR Through Churchgate to Virar<br />
WR Local Churchgate to Borivali<br />
CR Through CSTM to Kalyan<br />
CR Local CSTM to Thane<br />
Harbor Local CSTM to Panvel<br />
Calculated using consumption per<br />
motor car (MC) type:<br />
kWh/MC/km for DC = 4.94<br />
kWh/MC/km for AC/DC = 3.19<br />
Corridor:<br />
WR Through<br />
WR Local<br />
CR Through<br />
CR Local<br />
Harbor Local<br />
Corridor:<br />
WR Through<br />
WR Local<br />
CR Through<br />
CR Local<br />
1.4. Ridership per day Figures in thousands<br />
Central <strong>Railway</strong><br />
Western <strong>Railway</strong><br />
Arrangements for results monitoring<br />
Baseline<br />
01.04.09<br />
561,461<br />
447,578<br />
151,001<br />
5400<br />
4800<br />
4200<br />
81<br />
65<br />
59<br />
56<br />
December<br />
2012<br />
End of<br />
MUTP-2A<br />
(2014)<br />
815,400<br />
777,050<br />
182,646<br />
4000<br />
4000<br />
4000<br />
75<br />
62<br />
54<br />
53<br />
Reports<br />
Frequency<br />
Yearly<br />
reports<br />
Yearly<br />
reports<br />
Yearly<br />
reports<br />
77<br />
75<br />
17.62 12.76 Yearly<br />
reports<br />
-- Action plan<br />
prepared<br />
-- Action plan<br />
prepared<br />
(October<br />
2013)<br />
16<br />
17<br />
14.4<br />
14.4<br />
16.4<br />
Action plan<br />
prepared<br />
Action plan<br />
prepared<br />
18<br />
18<br />
18<br />
18<br />
18<br />
100%<br />
100%<br />
100%<br />
100%<br />
Yearly<br />
reports<br />
Yearly<br />
reports<br />
190 258 Yearly<br />
reports<br />
3592<br />
3298<br />
93.2%<br />
98.2%<br />
3797<br />
3486<br />
94%<br />
98.5%<br />
Yearly<br />
reports<br />
Data Collection<br />
Instruments<br />
Working timetable<br />
of WR and CR and<br />
operational<br />
statistics<br />
Ridership/<br />
occupancy survey<br />
of commuters<br />
Working timetable<br />
of WR and CR and<br />
operational<br />
statistics<br />
Operational<br />
Statistics<br />
Final Report<br />
Final Report<br />
Working timetable<br />
of WR and CR and<br />
operational<br />
statistics<br />
Working timetable<br />
of WR and CR and<br />
operational<br />
statistics<br />
Performance<br />
statistics of<br />
<strong>Railway</strong>s and<br />
inspection<br />
Performance<br />
statistics of<br />
<strong>Railway</strong>s<br />
Responsibility<br />
for Data<br />
Collection<br />
MRVC<br />
MRVC<br />
MRVC<br />
MRVC<br />
MRVC<br />
Rly Board,<br />
MRVC<br />
1.5. Punctuality – percentage of Central <strong>Railway</strong><br />
Yearly Performance MRVC<br />
trains reaching less than five Western <strong>Railway</strong><br />
reports statistics of<br />
minutes late to destination<br />
<strong>Railway</strong>s<br />
2.1. DC to AC conversion (Track 569 1577 Yearly Performance MRVC<br />
34<br />
MRVC<br />
MRVC<br />
MRVC<br />
MRVC
KM) reports statistics of<br />
<strong>Railway</strong>s<br />
2.2. Additional track (TKM) -- 181 km Yearly<br />
reports<br />
Performance<br />
statistics of<br />
3.1. Study on potential for ISO<br />
14001 at CR and WR<br />
completed<br />
3.2. Study for <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban<br />
development plan<br />
completed<br />
3.3. TA for IR strategy carried<br />
out<br />
3.4. Continued MRVC ISO<br />
Certification<br />
-- Study<br />
completed<br />
-- Study<br />
completed<br />
<strong>Railway</strong>s<br />
Final Report<br />
Final Report<br />
MRVC<br />
MRVC<br />
MRVC<br />
-- TA completed Final Report Rly Board,<br />
MRVC<br />
MRVC<br />
certified<br />
ISO 14001,<br />
ISO 18001<br />
Certification<br />
Yearly Certification<br />
<strong>Document</strong><br />
MRVC<br />
35
Annex 4: Detailed Project Description<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project 2A<br />
(Cost: US$970.5 million with IBRD’s share of US$430 million)<br />
107. The proposed MUTP-2A consists of the procurement of 72 additional twelve-car<br />
EMU trains, completion of conversion from 1500V DC to 25kV AC traction on the remaining<br />
sections of Central <strong>Railway</strong>, expansion of maintenance facilities for EMUs and provision of<br />
stabling lines for the additional EMU trains included in the project. Some technical assistance<br />
studies are also included in the project. The planned implementation period is five years,<br />
commencing in early 2010 and completing all components by the middle of 2014.<br />
108. The various components of MUTP-2A are as under:<br />
Component 1: Rolling Stock Fleet Increase:<br />
(Cost: US$659.6 million with IBRD’s share of US$355.7 million)*<br />
109. At the end of MUTP-1, <strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> Suburban System (MRSS) will have<br />
2260 EMU cars. Based on the Time Table prepared through simulation of train operation this<br />
holding will need to increase to 2980 cars for full use of the infrastructure created under MUTP-<br />
1 and by IR already. Thus, procurement of electrical equipment as kits for 864 EMU cars and<br />
application of these on trains manufactured at ICF, Chennai is included. Since by the time these<br />
trains are delivered and put in service the entire DC to AC conversion would have taken place,<br />
unlike the EMU rakes procured under MUTP-1, there will be no need for dual voltage rakes<br />
capable of operation on DC as well as AC systems. Hence these rakes will be for use on 25kV<br />
AC system only. The prototype supply of kits, manufacture of prototype rakes, and prototype<br />
testing will take another 12-15 months. The series supply of kits would thus materialize about<br />
two years after issue of bid documents. If the procurement process starts in early 2010, the<br />
delivery of kits will commence by 2012.<br />
110. The <strong>Bank</strong> loan will finance procurement of equipment for 864 EMU cars (72 trains<br />
of 12 cars each). The manufacture of trains at ICF, Chennai will be funded by counterpart funds.<br />
The manufacture of EMU cars against MUTP-2A would commence from early 2011 after the<br />
manufacture of EMU cars against MUTP-1 and another IR contract for EMU cars has been<br />
completed by the end of 2010. The delivery of 72 trains shall be completed by the February<br />
2015.<br />
Component 2: DC to AC Conversion (including Signal and Telecom improvements):<br />
(Cost: US$173.8 million with IBRD’s share of US$55.2 million)<br />
111. This component covers the conversion of electric traction system from 1500V DC<br />
to 25kV AC on the Central <strong>Railway</strong> over 172 track km (CSTM to Thane, CSTM to Tilaknagar<br />
and Mahim to Wadala Road sections). This comprises modification of overhead catenary, setting<br />
up of traction power sub-stations at Sion, Chinchpokli, Wadala Road and Thane, along with<br />
switching stations, procurement of catenary maintenance equipment and modifications to signal<br />
36
and telecom systems to make it compatible with AC traction. The conversion will permit<br />
enhanced power supply for additional services and longer trains consisting of 12 cars.<br />
112. The <strong>Bank</strong> loan will finance off line works such as setting up of new traction substations<br />
and switching posts at Sion and Chinchpokli between <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST and Vidyavihar,<br />
procurement of Digital Axle Counters (DAC) on <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST-Thane section, and other left over<br />
sections of MUTP-1, and catenary maintenance equipment. Additional setting up of two new<br />
traction substations at Wadala Road and Thane on Vidyavihar- Thane and <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST-Tilak<br />
Nagar section and other online works, such as modification to catenary system, quad cables and<br />
signaling system, will be executed by Central <strong>Railway</strong> through government funding.<br />
113. The conversion is planned to be completed by 2012-13. Apart from providing<br />
capacity to run more and longer trains the conversion will reduce cost of maintenance of power<br />
supply installations and transmission losses. There would also be significant energy saving due<br />
to higher potential for re-generation of power in case of 25 kV AC system in comparison to the<br />
1500V DC system.<br />
Component 3: EMU maintenance facilities and stabling lines:<br />
(Cost: US$117.7 million with IBRD’s share of Nil)<br />
114. New stabling lines to accommodate the additional trains will be constructed. The<br />
existing EMU maintenance depot at Kurla on Central <strong>Railway</strong> and the maintenance shed at Virar<br />
constructed under MUTP-1 will accommodate new stabling lines. In total, the project<br />
component comprises 73 new stabling lines, 34 (including four extensions from 9-car to 12-car)<br />
on Western <strong>Railway</strong> at Virar, Borivali and Vasai Road and 39 on Central <strong>Railway</strong> at Sion,<br />
Thakurli, Kasara, Khopoli, Belapur, Panvel, Ambernath, Karjat, Titwala and Kurla. The<br />
maintenance facilities for the additional coaches being inducted will be provided by augmenting<br />
the capacity in the five existing maintenance sheds (at <strong>Mumbai</strong> Central and Kandivali on<br />
Western <strong>Railway</strong> and Kurla, Kalva and Sanpada on Central <strong>Railway</strong>) and the two existing<br />
periodic overhaul workshops (Mahalaxmi on Western <strong>Railway</strong> and Matunga on Central<br />
<strong>Railway</strong>). Expansion of the new maintenance shed at Virar under construction in MUTP-1 is also<br />
included. No new shed or workshop is planned at this stage. Details of number of stabling lines<br />
at each location and and of the maintenance facilities are given in the MUTP-2A Implementation<br />
manual. This component is not funded by the <strong>Bank</strong> loan. The works are expected to be<br />
completed by the end of 2013.<br />
Component 4: Technical Assistance:<br />
(Cost:US$14.6 million with IBRD’s share of US$14.4 million)<br />
(a) Strategic Plans for Sustainable Expansion of Rail Services.<br />
1. Development Program for <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban Rail Services<br />
115. The TranSforM study recently completed by MMRDA outlines proposals for the<br />
transport network development, including the suburban rail network, to 2031 to meet the forecast<br />
travel demand. MRVC, Central and Western <strong>Railway</strong>s have put forward proposals for rail<br />
service development beyond the current project as an initial stage in realizing the 2031 network<br />
and services. Based on these proposals and in coherency with TranSforM recommendations, the<br />
37
proposed study will prepare a set of proposals for the staged expansion of network capacity of<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail system (integrated with other modes) and improvement of the quality of<br />
service to passengers to provide for seamless convenient travel by public transport. Key<br />
investments proposed for investment after this project in the period 2016 -2021 will then be the<br />
subject of a pre-Feasibility Study. The output of this study would be a costed, time based<br />
development plan for the suburban rail system to the year 2031, and a pre-feasibility study of the<br />
investments proposed for the period 2016 – 2021. The study will be implemented by MRVC.<br />
Target Completion Date: By October 2013. Proposed cost: US$5.4 million.<br />
2. Provision to support the development of the Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s long term strategy<br />
for Suburban Rail<br />
116. The recently produced Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s’ Vision 2020 document includes a strategy<br />
for suburban rail services. This technical assistance includes a provision for a series of studies<br />
and advisory services to assist Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s in developing the suburban services dimension of<br />
their long term strategy. This effort will include consideration for replication to other cities of the<br />
model developed with MRVC in <strong>Mumbai</strong>. It will also include considerations of institutional and<br />
policy improvements to improve further the efficiency of <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail services and<br />
their better integration within the overall regional urban transport system. <strong>Mumbai</strong> study will in<br />
particular take into account the physical segregation that will be achieved at the end of MUTP-<br />
2A and B between suburban and national passenger tracks. This technical assistance will be<br />
procured by MRVC and managed by the Indian <strong>Railway</strong> Board. Target Completion Date: By<br />
June 2014. Proposed cost: US$1.6 million.<br />
3. Revenue maximizing study in particular for non-fare box revenues with<br />
affordability study<br />
117. At present, most of the revenue on the suburban rail system comes from the sale of<br />
tickets. This revenue is insufficient to cover operating costs and the growing financial gap is<br />
covered by financial transfer from other rail business segments. The study will examine potential<br />
non-fare revenues including from advertising, rental of commercial spaces at stations and<br />
property development at stations and on other railway land (talking account to the study<br />
undertaken in MUTP-1). The potential for indirect user charges will also be examined, including<br />
payroll taxes and increased property taxes in areas around stations (taking account of work<br />
carried out as part of the TranSforM Study). The study will also review the socio-economic<br />
profile of customers and examine the justification for financial cross-support from other<br />
economic agents as well as the potential for fare adjustment in relation with affordability and<br />
service quality. The output of the study will be a strategy to improve the financial sustainability<br />
of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail operation and a suggested list of options, with estimates of potential<br />
revenue, a pre – FS level costed and time based implementation schedule, including any<br />
institutional and regulatory changes that may be required. The study will be procured by MRVC<br />
and managed by Indian <strong>Railway</strong> Board. Target Completion Date: By October 2013. Proposed<br />
cost: US$1.1 million.<br />
(b) Tactical programs for improving passenger convenience and information<br />
4. More efficient and user friendly ticket issuing<br />
38
118. 75 percent of people buying tickets for a rail journey purchase a separate ticket for<br />
each journey. This is time consuming and confusing for passengers as there are seven or eight<br />
different combinations of ticket systems and ways to purchase these tickets. This leads to<br />
maintenance problems and passenger complaints when machines break down. This TA will<br />
review the current arrangements, and develop functional specifications for ticketing machines<br />
and associated operational arrangements for issuing single journey tickets, with the potential to<br />
also issue passes (multi trip tickets). These ticketing arrangements should be compatible with<br />
existing and proposed arrangements for single journey tickets on other modes (bus, metro).<br />
Options will be examined and recommendations made which would be compatible with the<br />
Integrated Fares and Ticketing System for MMR being developed by MMRDA. The output will<br />
be a recommended system with a pre – FS level costed and time based implementation schedule.<br />
The study will be implemented by MRVC. Target Completion Date: By September 2013.<br />
Proposed cost: US$0.5 million.<br />
5. Passenger information and security<br />
119. The present system of Passenger Information and Guidance consisting of Audio<br />
Announcements, Train Information Display systems, and Clocks has been provided in a discrete<br />
manner requiring each item to have separate Operation and Control, wiring and other features.<br />
The station Signage for Passenger guidance is not to International standards. The Station and<br />
Platform area illumination including Concourse at major stations also needs to be upgraded<br />
keeping in view the optimum level of illumination to meet both aesthetic and energy saving<br />
requirements. For Video Surveillance of Station Entrances and Exits from security point of<br />
view, an integrated system needs to be designed with both Central and Remote Video<br />
Surveillance Monitoring features. The TA will identify the deficiencies in the existing system<br />
and taking into consideration the experience of comparable foreign Suburban Rail Systems<br />
recommend an integrated state-of-the-art Passenger Information and Guidance, Station and<br />
Platform area Illumination and Security Surveillance System. The TA will then prepare the<br />
technical specifications and cost estimate for the recommended solution. The study will be<br />
implemented by MRVC. Target Completion Date: By September 2013. Proposed cost: US$0.5<br />
million.<br />
(c) Tactical plans for improving safety and environmental management of operations<br />
6. Reduction of trespassing and improvement of safety of the track<br />
120. A large number of deaths and serious injuries occur daily due to passengers and<br />
other pedestrians being struck by trains while crossing the railway tracks in the station area or<br />
between stations. This study will analyze the data on these and will suggest remedial measures.<br />
These could include construction of user friendly grade separated crossings (subway/foot overbridges)<br />
combined with fencing and other barricades to restrict crossing of the track. The output<br />
would be a costed and time based program of remedial measures. The study will be implemented<br />
by MRVC. Target Completion Date: By December 2012. Proposed cost: US$0.1 million<br />
(Counterpart funded).<br />
7. Improved Environmental Management of Rail Operations<br />
121. MRVC has significantly improved the environmental management of its activities<br />
which are certified to be in compliance with ISO 14001. Central and Western <strong>Railway</strong>s have<br />
39
egun the process of certification of their ancillary installations, including car sheds and<br />
workshops using their own resources.<br />
122. This proposed activity will facilitate improvements to environmental performance<br />
of each type of installation beyond the regulatory requirements. It will cover the workshops, car<br />
sheds, and stations within Western <strong>Railway</strong> and Central <strong>Railway</strong>. The initial focus would be<br />
better water management and energy conservation. At the workshop, car shed, etc. the focus will<br />
be on water recycling, reuse and disposal of oily wastes along with establishing the feasibility of<br />
use of more energy efficient devices such as compressors, lights, and other equipment. At<br />
stations, techniques and incentives for ensuring cleaner stations and surroundings would be<br />
explored. The output of the study will be a series of specific actions to improve environmental<br />
performance at these locations, rated according to their efficiency and ease to implement,<br />
following consultations with the participating <strong>Railway</strong>s. The study will be implemented by<br />
MRVC. Target Completion Date: By December 2012. Proposed cost: US$0.5 million.<br />
(d) Capacity Building for Increased Operational Efficiency<br />
8. Power Supply Simulation<br />
123. Estimates of power supply requirements are needed for the expansion of services.<br />
Design of the most cost effective and efficient power supply depends on the use of computer<br />
based simulation software. This TA provides for the supply and installation of software,<br />
calibration to <strong>Mumbai</strong> conditions, training of staff in its use and assisting MRVC staff to run a<br />
minimum of two scenarios to ensure it is running effectively. The TA will be implemented by<br />
MRVC. Target Completion Date: By December 2013. Proposed cost: US$0.9 million.<br />
9. Rail Operations Simulation<br />
124. Optimizing the number of trains that can run on the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban system<br />
requires operations simulation software which uses inputs related to the characteristics of the<br />
infrastructure and the trains. MRVC is currently using software developed by the railways that<br />
dates from 1996-98 and requires too much input data, staff time and computation time to produce<br />
the desired results. This TA provides for the supply and installation of software, calibration to<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> conditions, training of staff in its use and assisting MRVC staff to run a minimum of<br />
two scenarios to ensure it is running effectively. The TA will be implemented by MRVC.<br />
Target Completion Date: By December 2012. Proposed cost: US$0.6 million.<br />
(e) Training<br />
125. Even though MRVC has successfully executed projects worth US$800 million, it<br />
recognizes the need to continuously improve the skills of its staff, and those of Central and<br />
Western <strong>Railway</strong>s with whom it interacts. To make project execution more effective and<br />
efficient, it wishes to ensure staff can be trained in best practices followed elsewhere in the<br />
world, in subjects including Financial Management, Project Management, Procurement as well<br />
as Technical engineering, Social, Environmental protection and Communication. This<br />
subcomponent provides funding for the development and delivery in <strong>Mumbai</strong> of training<br />
programs in these and other subjects, as well as domestic and limited international study tours<br />
based on Training Plans to be prepared and submitted annually to WB by MRVC. The<br />
40
completion date of training programs in the closing date of the project. Proposed cost: US$3.2<br />
million.<br />
41
Annex 5: Project Costs<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
Table 1. Project Costs and Financing by Components<br />
(Local Crore)<br />
(US$ million)<br />
Project Component Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total<br />
Component 1<br />
Rolling Stock Fleet Increase 2,377.0 553.0 2,930 535.1 124.5 659.6<br />
Component 2<br />
DC to AC Conversion 686.3 85.8 772 154.5 19.3 173.8<br />
Component 3<br />
EMU Maintenance Facilities<br />
and Stabling Lines<br />
523.0 - 523 117.7 - 117.7<br />
Component 4<br />
Technical Assistance 7.4 57.6 65 1.7 13.0 14.6<br />
Total Project Costs 3627.7 662.3 4,290 816.7 149.1 965.8<br />
Front-end Fee - 4.775 4.775 - 1.075 1.075<br />
Unallocated<br />
- 16.3 16.3 - 3.7 3.7<br />
Total Financing Sought 3627.7 683.4 4,311.1 816.7 153.8 970.5<br />
Note: Physical and price contingencies are all included<br />
Table 2. Project Cost by Components and Financiers<br />
(US$ Million)<br />
Project Component<br />
IBRD<br />
Loan<br />
%<br />
IBRD<br />
CPF %<br />
CPF<br />
% of<br />
Total<br />
Total<br />
Cost<br />
Component 1<br />
Rolling Stock Fleet Increase 355.7 83 303.9 56 68 659.6<br />
Component 2<br />
DC to AC Conversion 55.2 13 118.6 22 18 173.8<br />
Component 3<br />
EMU Maintenance Facilities<br />
and Stabling Lines 0 0 117.7 22 12 117.7<br />
Component 4<br />
Technical Assistance 14.4 3 0.2 0 2 14.6<br />
Total Project Costs 425.3 98.9 540.5 100 99.5 965.8<br />
Front-end Fee 1.075 0.25 - - 0.11 1.075<br />
Unallocated 3.7 0.85 - - 0.38 3.7<br />
Total Financing Sought 430 100 540.5 100 100 970.5<br />
Note: Physical and price contingencies are all included<br />
1. Assuming INR/US$ exchange rate = 44.42<br />
2. Identifiable taxes and duties are US$97 million, and the total financing need, with front-end fee and net of<br />
taxes is US$970.5 million. Therefore, the share of project cost net of taxes is 90 percent.<br />
42
Rolling Stock Fleet Increase<br />
Table 3. Outlay of Project by Years<br />
(US$ Million)<br />
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Total<br />
EMU Manufacture - - 20.8 62.5 119.4 101.2 303.9<br />
EMU Electrics - - 41.7 104.2 117.9 91.9 355.7<br />
Subtotal 0 0 62.5 166.7 237.3 193.1 659.6<br />
DC to AC Conversion<br />
Digital Axle Counter and Quad<br />
cable<br />
` 1.6 5.3 4.8 4 - 15.7<br />
Traction substations at<br />
Chinchpokli and Sion and six<br />
Switching posts<br />
Supply and installation of 110<br />
kV cables for Chinchpokli and<br />
Sion traction substations<br />
- 2.2 4.9 5.1 3.5 - 15.7<br />
- 2.8 1.8 1.3 0.6 - 6.5<br />
OHE Maintenance Car - - 1.1 6.3 5.6 4.3 17.3<br />
Non <strong>Bank</strong> Funded Works 2.2 35.1 21.8 20.6 19.1 19.8 118.6<br />
Subtotal 2.2 41.7 34.9 38.1 32.8 24.1 173.8<br />
EMU Maintenance Facilities and Stabling Lines<br />
EMU Maintenance Facilities - 20.5 20.8 20.9 9.2 71.4<br />
EMU Stabling Lines - 6.7 15.1 13.9 10.2 0.5 46.4<br />
Subtotal 0 27.2 35.9 34.8 19.4 0.5 117.7<br />
Technical Assistance<br />
<strong>Bank</strong> Funded TA - - 1.8 5.4 5.4 1.8 14.4<br />
Non-<strong>Bank</strong> Funded TA - - - 0.2 - - 0.2<br />
Subtotal 0 0 1.8 5.6 5.4 1.8 14.6<br />
Total Project Costs 2.2 68.9 135.1 245.2 294.9 219.5 965.8<br />
Note: Physical and price contingencies are all included<br />
43
Annex 6: Implementation Arrangements<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
126. MRVC is the project implementing agency for MUTP-2A and in that role is<br />
accountable for satisfactory completion of all the works of MUTP-2A. MMRDA, ICF, RDSO,<br />
WR and CR 30 are executing agencies. As the project implementing agency, MRVC is<br />
responsible for financing and procurement of all the contracts financed by the loan, including<br />
major equipment such as rolling stock/AC-DC equipment/cables, etc. as also for executing<br />
certain identified works in the field with due safeguards in consultation with the Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s.<br />
MOUs which incorporate insurance to respect EMP, time line of works and activities to be<br />
carried out by respective agencies, etc. will be set up between MRVC and the executing<br />
agencies.<br />
127. The execution of new line works which interfere with the running railway and<br />
require extensive block working are to be specifically listed out and carried out by the concerned<br />
Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s. The new lines work which interfere with the running railway only at the track<br />
linking on the two ends can be executed by MRVC with due safeguards.<br />
128. The works included in MUTP-2A have been selected to ensure that there is<br />
minimal Resettlement and Rehabilitation or land acquisition involved. This resettlement, which<br />
is expected to be very limited in extend, will be executed out by MMRDA, as per specific<br />
conditions stated in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between MRVC and MMRDA 31 .<br />
129. Role of MRVC: Chart 1 below illustrates MRVC’s role as implementing agency of<br />
MUTP-2A.<br />
30 Central <strong>Railway</strong> and Western <strong>Railway</strong> are two of the largest and busiest of the 16 zones of Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s. Their<br />
respective divisions <strong>Mumbai</strong> CSTM and <strong>Mumbai</strong> are specifically involved in this project. Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s is a<br />
department owned and controlled by the Government of India, via the Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s. IR manufactures much<br />
of its rolling stock and heavy engineering components at its six manufacturing plants, called Production Units,<br />
which are managed directly by the ministry. Integral Coach Factory at Chennai (ICF) is one of these. Each of the<br />
six production units is headed by a General Manager, who reports directly to the <strong>Railway</strong> Board. Research Design<br />
and Standards Organization (RDSO) is a research and development organization under the Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s,<br />
which functions as a technical adviser and consultant to the <strong>Railway</strong> Board, the Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s, the <strong>Railway</strong><br />
Production Units in respect of design and standardization of railway equipment and problems related to railway<br />
construction, operation and maintenance.<br />
31 MMRDA is a body of the Government of Maharashtra set up under the <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region<br />
Development Authority Act, 1974 Government of Maharashtra as an apex body for planning and co-ordination of<br />
development activities in the Region.<br />
44
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
130. The implementation arrangement for MUTP-2A will be as under:<br />
Work<br />
Implementing<br />
Agency<br />
Executing<br />
Agency<br />
Funding<br />
Arrangement<br />
Likely<br />
completion<br />
by<br />
(A) Goods/Supply and Installation<br />
1. EMU procurement/ manufacture<br />
1.1 Procurement of electrics MRVC MRVC WB Loan June 2014<br />
1.2 Manufacture MRVC ICF Counterpart Feb. 2015<br />
1.3 Design aspect MRVC RDSO -- --<br />
2. DC to AC Conversion<br />
Electrical Works<br />
2.1 Traction substations and switching MRVC MRVC WB Loan Dec. 2012<br />
posts between CSTM-Vidyavihar<br />
section<br />
2.2 Laying of 110 kV cable at Sion and MRVC MRVC WB Loan Jan. 2012<br />
Chinchpokli<br />
2.3 Procurement of OHE maintenance<br />
equipment<br />
MRVC MRVC WB Loan June 2014<br />
2.4 Traction substations and switching<br />
posts between Vidyavihar-Thane<br />
section<br />
2.5 Laying of 110 kV cable at Thane and<br />
Vadala Road<br />
2.6 OHE modification from 1500V DC to<br />
25 kV AC<br />
S&T Works<br />
2.7 Procurement, installation and<br />
commissioning of Digital Axle<br />
Counters<br />
MRVC CR Counterpart Dec. 2013<br />
MRVC CR Counterpart Dec. 2013<br />
MRVC CR Counterpart Dec. 2013<br />
MRVC MRVC WB Loan Dec. 2012<br />
2.8 Procurement of Quad cable MRVC CR Counterpart Dec. 2012<br />
2.9 Laying of cable MRVC CR Counterpart Dec. 2013<br />
(B) Works<br />
3 Maintenance facilities and stabling lines<br />
for EMUs<br />
3.1 Maintenance facilities for EMUs MRVC CR/WR Counterpart Dec. 2013<br />
3.2 Stabling Lines for EMUs<br />
Central <strong>Railway</strong><br />
Western <strong>Railway</strong><br />
MRVC<br />
CR<br />
MRVC<br />
Counterpart<br />
Counterpart<br />
Dec. 2013<br />
Dec. 2013<br />
(C) Technical Assistance<br />
4. Technical Assistance Studies MRVC MRVC WB Loan* June 2014<br />
* With the exception of MUTP2A-TA6: Reduction of trespassing and improvement of safety of the track, which is<br />
fully counterpart funded.<br />
45
Chart 1. Implementation Arrangements for MUTP-2A<br />
46
131. Responsibilities of MRVC (Project Management Unit): MRVC is the nodal<br />
organization for implementing MUTP-2A on behalf of Govt. of India and Govt. of Maharashtra.<br />
Following will the responsibilities of MRVC:<br />
(a) To monitor and evaluate the project;<br />
(b) To coordinate the implementation of the project;<br />
(c) To prepare and forward periodical reports covering physical and financial progress;<br />
(d) To prepare implementation completion report;<br />
(e) To undertake necessary surveys and studies for project evaluation.<br />
132. Responsibilities of Maharashtra and MMRDA: implementation responsibilities of<br />
the Government of Maharashtra include the following:<br />
(a) be responsible, through the MMRDA and in cooperation with MRVC, for carrying out<br />
Project activities related to social management, including carrying out land acquisition<br />
and resettlement and rehabilitation activities (including preparation and implementation<br />
of RAPs), if any; and<br />
(b) facilitate the preparation and carrying out of relevant studies and related activities and<br />
recommendations under Component 4 of the Project.<br />
133. Project Director of MUTP-2A: Director (Technical), MRVC is Project Director<br />
for MUTP-2A for overall monitoring and coordination of the project. He will be responsible to<br />
coordinate various agencies such as Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s, Ministry of Finance, Planning<br />
Commission, <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>, GOM, RDSO, ICF, CR, WR and other different agencies.<br />
134. Staffing at MRVC: MRVC will consist of a team of professionals specializing in<br />
the following areas:<br />
(a) Finance;<br />
(b) Procurement;<br />
(c) Environment and social;<br />
(d) Training;<br />
(e) Institutional development;<br />
(f) Engineering;<br />
135. These professionals could either be staff deputed from MOR or could be<br />
outsourced from the open market. In addition, services of retired railway employees may also be<br />
engaged in successful implementation of the project. The organizational structure of MRVC<br />
is given in Chart 2 below.<br />
136. Training of MRVC employees: The training of the MRVC employees are made to<br />
familiarize with the procedures and methods as part of this project. MRVC will also arrange a<br />
need based training program as and when required for each area of specialization.<br />
47
Chart 2. Organizational Chart for MRVC<br />
Officers - 58<br />
Assisting Staff - 137<br />
Total - 195<br />
48
Annex 6A: Governance and Accountability Action Plan (GAAP)<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
137. The context for the preparation of the Governance and Accountability Action Plan<br />
(GAAP) is the recognition by the MRVC and the <strong>Bank</strong> of the need to improve accountability<br />
arrangements to reduce the chances of corruption and enhance transparency in implementation of<br />
MUTP-2A. The GAAP has been prepared taking into consideration key risks that may be<br />
encountered during implementation of the project, relevant issues identified from the Guidance<br />
Note on Transport Sector GAAP, lessons learned from MUTP-1 and the measures that are<br />
already/would be in place to mitigate the impact of these risks on achievement of the project<br />
development objectives.<br />
138. The GAAP seeks to build upon the GOI’s efforts and existing systems such as the<br />
Right to Information Act (RTIA, 2005), initiatives of the Central Vigilance Commission in<br />
enhancing transparency, and various measures already institutionalized by MRVC. It is<br />
premised on enhanced policies, procedures, institutions and capacity for better governance. The<br />
underlying assumption is that such mechanisms will enable increased public scrutiny of the<br />
project, better address stakeholder concerns and thereby enhance accountability.<br />
Key Governance Risks<br />
139. Based on a review of existing procedures, policies, processes and institutional<br />
capacity at MRVC, Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s, and applicable GoI rules and regulations, the following<br />
have been identified as the critical risks in project implementation:<br />
(a) Weak disclosure of project information leading to low stakeholder participation and<br />
accountability<br />
(b) Weak complaint and grievance redressal mechanisms<br />
(c) Risk of collusion, fraud and corruption in procurement<br />
(d) Weak internal audit and control procedures leading to risk of financial irregularities<br />
(e) Weak institutional capacity for project implementation<br />
(f) Weak coordination leading to risk of inordinate delays in physical progress of works<br />
(g) Implementation delays due to socio-political interference<br />
Some Opportunities<br />
140. MRVC has a pro-active vigilance unit headed by a Chief Vigilance Officer (CVO)<br />
(part-time), who is assisted by a Deputy CVO and a Chief Vigilance Inspector (part-time). This<br />
unit works in close coordination with the Vigilance Department of the Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s and<br />
the Central Vigilance Commission. It has been actively focusing on preventive vigilance, system<br />
improvements through short inspirational video films with anti-corruption messages, interactive<br />
presentations and discussions on complex contract management issues. The unit also publishes a<br />
monthly newsletter “Prahari” (Sentinel) and organizes annual events such as vigilance quiz,<br />
caption contests, debates and essay competitions to raise awareness about fraud and corruption<br />
amongst the staff.<br />
49
141. To enhance transparency and fairness in procurement, MRVC proposes to<br />
introduce Integrity Pacts during 2009-2010 in association with Transparency International and<br />
the Central Vigilance Commission on all its contracts.<br />
142. MRVC has obtained ISO9001 certification for quality of operations. On each of<br />
the contracts proposed in MUTP-2A, quality control would be as shown in the table below:<br />
S.No. Contract Quality Control<br />
1 Supply and laying of 110 kV cable MRVC, Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />
2 DAC RDSO<br />
3 EMU Procurement Prototype by RDSO; routine inspection by Resident<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> Advisor in country of manufacture<br />
4 Installation and commissioning of<br />
TSS/switching posts<br />
5 Procurement of machinery and plant<br />
for OHE maintenance<br />
RITES India <strong>Ltd</strong>., RDSO (if prototype)<br />
Resident <strong>Railway</strong> Advisor in country of manufacture<br />
(as needed)<br />
In addition, MRVC has already been engaging various third parties/technical bodies for technical<br />
reviews/assessments during execution of MUTP-1 and envisages similar engagements in MUTP-<br />
2A, as necessary.<br />
143. Through MUTP-1, MRVC has developed the ability to liaise effectively with the<br />
several departments and agencies of the IR (Board, Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s, RDSO, ICF), the GOM etc.<br />
which would considerably reduce the risk of delays in coordination and decision-making in<br />
MUTP-2A. MRVC conducts meetings of the coordination committee every 45 days with the<br />
zonal railways and other executing agencies to discuss pending issues on MUTP-1, and<br />
envisages continuation of such coordination meetings on MUTP-2A as well. In addition, the<br />
MRVC reports to the <strong>Railway</strong> Board monthly on each aspect of projects under implementation.<br />
In the annual ratings of PSUs by the GoI's Department of Public Enterprises under Ministry of<br />
Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises, MRVC's performance has been rated as very good<br />
(2007-08) and excellent (2008-09), which also points to better coordination as well.<br />
144. Financial management systems in MRVC comprising budgeting, accounting,<br />
internal controls, financial reporting and auditing were put in place during the implementation of<br />
MUTP-1. Following a Corporate Governance and Financial Accountability assessment by the<br />
<strong>Bank</strong>, MRVC has formulated an action plan to further strengthen some of these areas as<br />
mentioned in Annex 7.<br />
145. MRVC’s accounting staff (mostly on deputation from the Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s) is<br />
experienced and familiar with the <strong>Bank</strong>’s requirements.<br />
146. There is a 3-tier system of audit in MRVC comprising of: (i) concurrent internal<br />
audit by management appointed firm of Chartered Accountants under a Terms of Reference; (ii)<br />
annual statutory audit of the entity by independent firm of Chartered Accountants appointed by<br />
50
the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India; and (iii) audit by CAG through the<br />
Principal Director of Commercial Audit.<br />
Action Plan<br />
147. Taking the above into consideration, a GAAP has been prepared that comprises of<br />
(i) project level actions that support transparent systems and processes for procurement, financial<br />
management and reporting and better quality assurance through enhanced demand-side<br />
mechanisms within the project, and (ii) organization level reforms to create an enabling<br />
environment for better enforcement and prevention of corruption. These actions are in the<br />
following areas:<br />
(a) Actions to enhance policies<br />
(b) Actions to enhance procedures<br />
(c) Actions to enhance institutions<br />
(d) Actions to strengthen capacity and human resources<br />
The complete action plan matrix is given in Table 1. Key components of the action plan are<br />
described in the following sections.<br />
Actions for Enhancing Information Disclosure<br />
148. India passed the Right to Information Act, in 2005 and the Act became operational<br />
across India from 12 October 2005. The Act mandates the disclosure of and universal access to<br />
information wherever in the public interest. Compliance to the Act is required for all public<br />
entities including MRVC.<br />
149. Implementation of RTI requires systems for on demand and suo moto disclosure of<br />
information, and for each government department to develop a disclosure policy, automated<br />
systems for record and document management, and information handling, and appointment of<br />
trained staff, programs for citizen awareness, and annual progress reporting. As mandated by the<br />
Act, MRVC has appointed on part-time basis a Public Information Officer (PIO), Assistant<br />
Public Information Officer and the Appellate Authority and has uploaded comprehensive<br />
information about MRVC’s functioning, project related information, agency’s annual report,<br />
sources of funds, directory, roles and responsibilities of MRVC officials, etc. on MRVC’s<br />
website (www.mrvc.indianrail.gov.in).<br />
150. To comply with the RTIA provisions for both on-demand and suo moto disclosure<br />
of project related information, MRVC has also formulated a comprehensive project disclosure<br />
policy (as given in Chapter 9 of the implementation manual).<br />
Actions for Enhancing Complaint Handling<br />
151. MRVC will establish a system to register and monitor status of follow up of all<br />
received comments, suggestions and grievances and enable the same on its web site<br />
(www.mrvc.indianrail.gov.in), which will be updated monthly. MRVC will record and/or refer<br />
as appropriate all incoming grievances or complaints pertaining to the MUTP-2A project.<br />
51
152. MRVC will also establish procedures to deal with external complaints on<br />
procurement, fraud/corruption and construction quality (as described in Chapter 9 of<br />
Implementation Manual). MRVC will respond to all complaints, pertaining to MUTP-2A within<br />
15 days of receipt, with copy to Managing Director, MRVC. Tracking of the status of<br />
complaints, related investigations and measures taken will be reported in monthly reports to<br />
management. Complaints deemed possible serious infringements may be further investigated by<br />
the Vigilance unit of MRVC and the Chief Vigilance Commission. These cases will also be<br />
included in quarterly reports to the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />
153. Contact information (dedicated email address, phone numbers) of the complaint<br />
handling and vigilance officials shall be widely publicized. Web-based campaigns, newspaper<br />
advertisements and displays on hoardings at highly visible locations will also be made to<br />
encourage public to report any misconduct, misappropriation and grievances to MRVC.<br />
Actions to deter Fraud and Corruption<br />
154. MRVC will formulate a transparent policy describing incentives for<br />
whistleblowers, sanctions for staff found indulging in fraudulent behavior and after due<br />
approvals, disclose these to the public. If as a result of any such information provided by the<br />
member of the public, cost savings are achieved or charges of misconduct and misappropriation<br />
are proven, such members of the public will be awarded some recognition such as a certificate of<br />
excellence or felicitation at a public ceremony with or without a monetary reward.<br />
Simultaneously, strict disincentives will be announced for the erring members of the departments<br />
and remedial actions established in cases of fraud and corruption. This will include sanctions to<br />
government staff proven to be involved in such cases.<br />
155. Any entity that is found to have misused funds, or not effectively carried out key<br />
elements of the anti-corruption plan, may be excluded from participation in subsequent works of<br />
MRVC. Information regarding such cases, where lessons are learned and funds are retrieved, will<br />
be widely published for information of the members of public. Strict procedures to ensure<br />
anonymity of informants will be enforced.<br />
Actions to Enhance Quality and Project Monitoring<br />
156. In addition to design reviews by MRVC/RDSO, MRVC will engage independent<br />
third parties/quality assurance consultants such as Indian Institute of Technology, National<br />
Institute of Design under agreed Terms of Reference for evaluations of technical designs and<br />
advice on technical issues wherever necessary as per the contractual provisions. These entities<br />
would also verify achievement of project milestones, enabling better controls over contractor<br />
payments. MRVC will also commission impact assessment studies and user satisfaction surveys<br />
annually to obtain stakeholder feedback.<br />
157. To strengthen project monitoring, MRVC proposes to develop a MIS within a year<br />
of project start, and enable it online for quick review and decision-making. To facilitate the<br />
review, MRVC will formulate a score-card method for judging physical and financial progress of<br />
the project at any stage. Proposed annual project audits will also enable better monitoring.<br />
52
Actions to Strengthen Institutions and Capacity<br />
158. Following an assessment of the current corporate governance and financial<br />
management arrangements, MRVC has evolved an action plan for strengthening the same. The<br />
actionable areas include strengthening of internal audit, project monitoring and contract<br />
management arrangements. In addition, the proposed project will also be subject to annual<br />
project audit under <strong>Bank</strong> agreed TOR and the complete report would be published on MRVC’s<br />
website.<br />
159. MRVC will also start building a database with procurement and contractor<br />
performance data from the project such as number of bids received, bid prices, unit prices,<br />
specifications, time and cost overruns. This will enable statistical analysis to preclude collusion<br />
and facilitate reference checks on future bids. MRVC will also disclose on its website the process<br />
for disqualification of bidders found to engage in fraudulent/corrupt practices.<br />
160. MRVC will undertake a comprehensive training needs assessment for its entire<br />
staff, and finalize a training plan. This, along with the TA studies undertaken 32 should facilitate<br />
strengthening of capacity. In addition, MRVC proposes to include training on the RTIA for all its<br />
officers and staff to sensitize them on the need for transparency of information.<br />
Monitoring Indicators<br />
161. The <strong>Bank</strong> will monitor implementation of these elements wherever necessary as<br />
per the contractual provisions 37 , through inter alia:<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
(c)<br />
(d)<br />
(e)<br />
Disclosure of information will be supervised mainly through: (a) checking the<br />
frequency and comprehensiveness of website updates, and (b) checking the<br />
comprehensiveness of information available on citizen information boards at site(s),<br />
newsletters etc.<br />
Quality monitoring will be supervised through the harnessing of third parties in<br />
review of project design and monitoring, periodicity of reports of the impact<br />
assessment and user satisfaction surveys.<br />
The complaints handling system and the system of sanctions and remedies will be<br />
supervised mainly through: (a) periodic review of statistics based on records kept<br />
on the website of MRVC; (b) field level checks to ensure that problems are being<br />
reported and acted upon; (c) review of quarterly reports on complaint handling<br />
submitted to the <strong>Bank</strong><br />
Institutional improvements will be monitored through the progress in<br />
implementation of the CGFA action plan, online complaints handling system,<br />
procurement and project management database and operability of the project MIS.<br />
Capacity enhancements will be monitored through percentage of staff and officers<br />
sent for training including on RTIA, number and type of preventive vigilance<br />
initiatives.<br />
32 See Annex 4<br />
53
Indicative Costs<br />
162. The cost of the GAAP implementation is part of the technical assistance<br />
component of the project and project implementation costs (financed by MRVC) comprising of:<br />
(a) cost to develop MIS; (b) costs to develop online complaint handling mechanism; (c) costs to<br />
commission third-party monitors/quality assurance consultants; (d) costs to commission the<br />
annual impact assessment and user satisfaction surveys; (e) cost of training staff.<br />
163. It has been agreed that MRVC and the <strong>Bank</strong> will review the implementation of the<br />
GAAP during the supervision missions and a comprehensive review at mid-term. This will<br />
enable an evaluation of the GAAP’s effectiveness and opportunity for mid-course corrections.<br />
54
Table 1: Governance and Accountability Action Plan<br />
1. Policy Actions to Enhance Transparency<br />
Risk Area<br />
Action(s) to be taken to mitigate risk<br />
Project-level<br />
Formulate a proactive public disclosure policy and<br />
disclose all project information to the public through<br />
Discretion in<br />
decision making,<br />
lack of<br />
transparency and the MRVC web-site.<br />
accountability<br />
and political to highlight issues.<br />
interference that<br />
may adversely<br />
affect project<br />
outcomes.<br />
2. Measures to Enhance Procedures<br />
Corruption/<br />
collusion in<br />
procurement;<br />
weak financial<br />
management and<br />
complaint<br />
handling<br />
procedures;<br />
weak<br />
coordination<br />
with other<br />
executing<br />
agencies<br />
Engagement with media during supervision missions<br />
Entity-level<br />
Formulate a transparent policy describing sanctions for<br />
staff found indulging in fraudulent behavior and<br />
incentives for whistleblowers.<br />
Project-level<br />
Standardize eligibility criteria for bidders and product<br />
quality needs to preclude confusion. Consult bidders<br />
through pre-bid meetings on the same as needed;<br />
discourage repeated cancellation of bid invitations.<br />
Incorporate feedback received from participatory<br />
monitoring exercises on financial matters in periodic<br />
financial reviews.<br />
Sign Memoranda of Understanding with all the other<br />
executing agencies for better coordination.<br />
Entity-level<br />
Appoint a complaint handling officer and establish<br />
procedures to deal with complaints on procurement,<br />
Maintain an updated database on complaints received<br />
and action taken for suo moto or on-demand public<br />
disclosure<br />
Strengthen systems and procedures to implement RTI –<br />
through Website, Newsletter, Citizen Information Boards<br />
etc.<br />
Improve financial management systems to facilitate<br />
management decisions, periodic monitoring of budgets<br />
and timely reporting.<br />
Notify details of the process for disqualification of<br />
bidders who engage in misrepresentation/ fraudulent/<br />
corrupt practices on MRVC website (<strong>Railway</strong> Board<br />
policy of disqualifying bidders who engage in such<br />
practices for supplying to <strong>Railway</strong> Stores will be adapted<br />
for this)<br />
3. Measures to Strengthen Institutions<br />
Weak complaint<br />
and grievance<br />
handling<br />
mechanisms,<br />
weak corporate<br />
governance,<br />
weak quality<br />
control and<br />
monitoring<br />
Project-level<br />
Introduce Integrity Pacts for increased Transparency and<br />
Integrity on all contracts in MUTP-2A<br />
Introduce annual project audit and need-based internal<br />
audit and take prompt action to resolve all audit<br />
observations.<br />
Develop a project MIS for effective project monitoring<br />
and review and link it to the web for quick review and<br />
Timeline/Stat<br />
us<br />
Policy<br />
formulated and<br />
agreed upon.<br />
As needed.<br />
July 2010<br />
Continuous<br />
Quarterly<br />
June 2010<br />
July 2010<br />
March 2010<br />
Already in<br />
place; will be<br />
further<br />
strengthened<br />
August 2010<br />
July 2010<br />
As and when<br />
mutually<br />
agreed<br />
Annual<br />
To be<br />
developed<br />
Implementing<br />
Officials<br />
PIO, AA,<br />
HODs<br />
<strong>Bank</strong>, MRVC<br />
BOD,<br />
Vigilance<br />
Officials<br />
HODs<br />
Finance<br />
Officials<br />
BOD<br />
BOD,<br />
Vigilance<br />
PIO, AA, CO<br />
and HODs<br />
PIO, AA,<br />
HODs<br />
MRVC FM<br />
Vigilance<br />
officials<br />
BOD/Vigilan<br />
ce Officials<br />
Finance<br />
officials,<br />
BOD<br />
HODs<br />
55
follow up action.<br />
during the 1 st<br />
year of project<br />
execution<br />
Commission impact assessment studies and user<br />
satisfaction surveys to obtain user feedback<br />
Empanel reputed third-parties for technical<br />
design/studies and/or evaluations.<br />
Entity-level<br />
Implement corporate governance and financial<br />
accountability action plan.<br />
Develop a comprehensive comments, suggestions and<br />
grievances handling system and enable the same on the<br />
MRVC Website<br />
Commission an online system for registering, tracking<br />
and monitoring of complaints.<br />
Start compiling database on number of bids, bid prices,<br />
unit prices, specifications, contractor performance for<br />
future reference.<br />
4. Measures to Enhance Human Resources (all at entity-level)<br />
Weak<br />
implementation<br />
arrangements TA.<br />
that may<br />
adversely affect<br />
MRVC staff<br />
project processes<br />
and results<br />
Key: AA = Assistant Accounts Officer<br />
Identify training needs and finalize training plan for all<br />
staff. Conduct appropriate training for staff from <strong>Bank</strong><br />
Conduct campaigns to spread awareness of anticorruption<br />
measures and vigilance mechanisms among<br />
Annual<br />
As needed.<br />
Plan agreed<br />
upon.<br />
Already in<br />
place<br />
July 2010<br />
July 2010<br />
Continuous<br />
Periodically.<br />
BOD/HODs<br />
HODs<br />
Finance<br />
officials,<br />
BOD<br />
Vigilance<br />
Officials and<br />
Complaint<br />
Handling<br />
Officers<br />
Vigilance<br />
Officials and<br />
Complaint<br />
Handling<br />
Officers<br />
Procurement<br />
officials,<br />
HODs<br />
HODs/HRD<br />
Vigilance<br />
Officials<br />
Conduct training on RTI for all MRVC officers and staff Continuous HRD and<br />
PIO, AA<br />
BOD = Board of Directors<br />
CO = Complaints Officer<br />
HOD = Head of Department<br />
HRD = Human Resources Department<br />
PIO = Public Information Officer<br />
56
Annex 6 B: Supervision Strategy Matrix<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
164. The Supervision Strategy is to ensure that the objective of MUTP-2A project are<br />
achieved satisfactorily and timely manner and the implementation of all project activities follow<br />
agreed procedures and complies with all fiduciary and safeguard requirements. Supervision<br />
Strategy for the proposed MUTP-2A is developed based on the lessons learnt from the ongoing<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project, other projects in India Portfolio and India Health Sector DIR,<br />
which indentified, among other things, weaknesses in <strong>Bank</strong>’s supervision strategy and lack of<br />
field and independent verification of project activities early on. Also, the supervision strategy<br />
links the key project risks identified in the Risk Identification Worksheet with the mitigation<br />
measures laid out in the Governance and Accountability Action Plan.<br />
165. Supervision Methodology: The project supervision will be based on (i) physical<br />
verification of the works by the <strong>Bank</strong> task team and <strong>Bank</strong> hired consultants; (ii) Sample cross<br />
checking and verification of the progress reports provided by the client, (iii) Close scrutiny of<br />
audit reports and financial management reports (iv) Carrying out interim missions, in addition to<br />
full implementation support missions on key issues, (v) discussions and regular meetings with<br />
the implementing agency and other stake holders, (vi) Close follow up with the implementing<br />
agency on the key issues highlighted during the implementation support missions and (vii) active<br />
involvement of the <strong>Bank</strong> management and the Department of Economic Affairs to resolve key<br />
issues specially those related with fraud and corruption.<br />
166. Team Composition: The <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> supervision core team will comprise<br />
specialists having high level of skills covering urban transport, railway engineering, social and<br />
environment impact management, procurement, financial management and audit, institutional/<br />
governance, and monitoring and evaluation.<br />
167. Most of the <strong>Bank</strong> task team will be based in Delhi <strong>Bank</strong> office, which will allow<br />
prompt visits by individual team members to the field as and when required. In addition, the<br />
<strong>Bank</strong> will hire from time to time international experts to check the quality of the work and<br />
provide the expert support for overall project implementation.<br />
168. Frequency of the visits: The <strong>Bank</strong> team will visit project site twice a year. In<br />
addition, interim missions will be carried out on key issues. The supervision task team will<br />
develop, together with the client, a check list to review the implementation of the project<br />
including safeguard and fiduciary actions. This will ensure an objective way of monitoring the<br />
project.<br />
169. Supervision Budget: A supervision budget of US$200,000 per year is estimated<br />
to cover the cost of <strong>Bank</strong> staff, consultants and travel expenses.<br />
170. Supervision strategy and expected outcome: The main supervision activities to<br />
be covered by the <strong>Bank</strong> and the client are provided in the table below which also highlights the<br />
expected outcomes.<br />
57
Table1. Supervision Strategy Matrix<br />
Client’s role 33 <strong>Bank</strong>’s role Expected outcomes<br />
Review of the designs to be carried out by<br />
MRVC/ RDSO and supervision of the<br />
works to be carried out by MRVC and other<br />
executing agencies.<br />
MRVC clearance process to be followed for<br />
all works, goods and TA contracts for the<br />
value upto INR 1000 million (US20<br />
million) and for those above this value,<br />
evaluation report to be forwarded to Indian<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> Board for review of the<br />
recommendations<br />
To use <strong>Bank</strong>’s Standard Bid <strong>Document</strong>s or<br />
updated model documents as applicable<br />
MRVC staff to attend training courses on<br />
procurement, contract administration and<br />
project management.<br />
All the actions listed in Annex 7<br />
TECHNICAL and Quality ASPECTS<br />
Implementation support mission and<br />
interim missions<br />
Review of the progress reports<br />
Discussion and regular meetings with the<br />
implementing agency and other stake<br />
holders.<br />
PROCUREMENT<br />
Most of the contracts will be prior<br />
reviewed.<br />
Review of the contracts not subject to prior<br />
review by the <strong>Bank</strong> will be carried out<br />
either by the <strong>Bank</strong> team or <strong>Bank</strong> hired<br />
consultant, who will review agreed samples<br />
of such contracts. Observations from such<br />
reviews shall be shared with the Borrower<br />
and lessons learnt will be implemented for<br />
future procurement.<br />
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT<br />
Focus on the adequacy of the financial<br />
reporting, including timeliness and<br />
completeness of the financial reports.<br />
Desk review of the audit reports and follow<br />
up on action taken<br />
Participating in site visits to review<br />
MRVC’s internal control procedures and<br />
practices.<br />
Compliance of the<br />
contract conditions,<br />
engineering design<br />
and technical<br />
specifications<br />
Reduced possibility of<br />
cost and time over run<br />
Reduced possibility of<br />
contract variations.<br />
<strong>Bank</strong> / MRVC<br />
procurement<br />
guidelines followed<br />
Open, transparent and<br />
competitive<br />
procurement achieved.<br />
Compliance with all<br />
financial management<br />
requirements;<br />
Audit comments taken<br />
into considerations;<br />
Financial progress<br />
closely following<br />
physical progress.<br />
Coordinate and monitor safeguard measures<br />
to mitigate impacts; and periodically report<br />
about progress.<br />
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFEGUARDS<br />
Monitor safeguard and value added<br />
measures implemented by MRVC and<br />
provide technical advice as necessary and<br />
appropriate through discussion and sharing<br />
of emerging issues.<br />
Compliance with<br />
safeguard policies and<br />
achieving social and<br />
environmental value<br />
added outcomes.<br />
33 Includes NGO and consultants hired by the client<br />
58
Annex 7: Financial Management and Disbursement Arrangements<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
Summary of Financial Management (FM) Assessment<br />
171. The <strong>Bank</strong> funded MUTP-1 34 under which MRVC is responsible for<br />
implementation of the rail component is continuing. MRVC is the sole implementing agency for<br />
MUTP-2A and will be responsible for FM arrangements for the project. This FM assessment<br />
concludes that MRVC has a financial management system which is considered adequate, to<br />
account for and report on the project resources and expenditures accurately. However there is<br />
scope for further improvements in these FM arrangements and in this respect an action plan has<br />
been discussed and agreed with MRVC.<br />
Background<br />
172. MRVC was incorporated on July 12 1999 as a government company under the<br />
Ministry of <strong>Railway</strong>s (MOR) to implement the rail component of an integrated rail cum road<br />
urban transport project called <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project (MUTP). Its vision/ mission is to<br />
develop world class infrastructure for an efficient, safe and sustainable railway system in<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban section to provide comfortable and friendly train services to the commuters 35 .<br />
MRVC is also involved in the further planning and development of <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban Rail<br />
System for improved rail services in close coordination with Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s and Government of<br />
Maharashtra. As per Article 177 of the Memorandum and Articles of Association of MRVC the<br />
period of validity of MRVC is minimum five years and maximum 15 years. MRVC has applied<br />
to both MOR and GOM for extension of validity period. The approval is expected shortly.<br />
173. MRVC’s has a share capital of Rs.25 crores held in the ratio of 51:49 by Indian<br />
<strong>Railway</strong>s and Government of Maharashtra. Its existing manpower is approximately 180. It<br />
exercises autonomy and delegation of financial powers as applicable to Schedule-A public sector<br />
companies. MRVC’s sources of revenue comprise Direction and General Charges recovered<br />
from projects executed by MRVC, Central and Western <strong>Railway</strong>, MMRDA and other executing<br />
agencies under MUTP-1 and interest on term deposit.<br />
174. Operating results of MRVC:<br />
Rs. Crores<br />
Particulars 2008-09 2007-08 2006-07<br />
Total income 36.38 32.95 17.04<br />
Total expenditure 16.65 10.44 7.04<br />
Surplus 19.73 22.51 10.00<br />
Accumulated surplus 81.48 63.84 41.23<br />
175. MUTP-2A requires a total financing of US$970.5 million (Project costs of Rs.4290<br />
crores). The share of IBRD is estimated at US$430 million and the balance US$540.5 million is<br />
34 The overall coordinating implementing agency under MUTP-1 is <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Regional Development<br />
Authority (MMRDA), responsible for the road component of the project including R&R. Municipal <strong>Corporation</strong> of<br />
the Greater <strong>Mumbai</strong>, Bombay Electricity and Bus Services ; Maharashtra State Road Development <strong>Corporation</strong><br />
,MRVC and Traffic Police are other executing agencies under MUTP-1.<br />
35 Source Corporate Plan 2006-2016.<br />
59
counterpart funded. The assets created under the project will be owned by CR/ WR as<br />
appropriate.<br />
Financial Management Strengths, Weaknesses and Mitigating Arrangements<br />
176. The project draws the following strengths in the area of financial management: a<br />
budgeting, accounting and reporting system has been operational in the entity for the past several<br />
years, which will be used for accounting and generating the required financial reports under the<br />
project. MRVC is implementing satisfactorily the rail component of MUTP-1 funded by the<br />
<strong>Bank</strong> and has experience of the <strong>Bank</strong>’s FM policies and procedures including those relating to<br />
special commitments. A detailed project implementation manual has been prepared.<br />
177. The <strong>Bank</strong> team conducted a review of financial management, corporate<br />
governance and accountability arrangements of MRVC 36 which has indicated that MRVC has<br />
institutionalized certain cardinal principles in areas like accounting, auditing, internal control,<br />
budgeting and reporting which have laid the foundation for a basic financial accountability and<br />
corporate governance framework in the organization. However there is scope to further improve<br />
financial accountability and corporate governance arrangements of the organization to further<br />
strengthen the capacity to more effectively manage the proposed project. Actions have been<br />
initiated to strengthen internal audit and for updating finance manuals. Others are proposed in<br />
detail in the action plan (refer to Table 3, page 71). The overall FM risk is rated at Moderate.<br />
Type of Risk<br />
Inherent<br />
Risks<br />
Country level<br />
(India)<br />
Entity level (at<br />
MRVC level)<br />
Risk<br />
Assessment<br />
Risk Mitigating Measures<br />
Residual Risk<br />
M India country level rating. GoI is the borrower. M<br />
H<br />
Action plan for improvement of corporate governance<br />
and financial accountability arrangements agreed during<br />
preparation.<br />
Project level H Internal controls built into the project design with<br />
enhanced internal audit and improved contract<br />
management. Project FM manual as part of overall<br />
Implementation Manual is being finalized<br />
Overall inherent Risk<br />
Control Risks<br />
Budgeting S Budgeting framework exists; Monitoring framework will<br />
be improved; Annual work plans and cash forecasting<br />
will be enhanced.<br />
Accounting M Separate trial balances of MUTP-2A will be prepared;<br />
Accounting and reporting formats will be put in place;<br />
Internal H<br />
Controls<br />
Internal audit system will be strengthened; Audit<br />
committee will be strengthened with independent<br />
directors and made more effective; Internal controls for<br />
contract management will be enhanced.<br />
Funds flow M Funds flow to MRVC through the budget route from<br />
MOR and GOM. Counterpart funding will be available.<br />
Similar fund flow mechanism under MUTP-1 found<br />
effective.<br />
S<br />
S<br />
S<br />
M<br />
L<br />
S<br />
L<br />
36<br />
A report on “Corporate Governance and Financial Accountability Arrangements” prepared by the <strong>Bank</strong> is<br />
available in the project files. The report contains a detailed assessment and identifies areas for improvements along<br />
with an action plan.<br />
60
Financial<br />
Reporting<br />
S<br />
Formats agreed for project reporting; Internal financial<br />
reporting for entity will be enhanced.<br />
Auditing S Independent project auditor with agreed terms of<br />
reference.<br />
Overall control Risk<br />
RESIDUAL RISK RATING<br />
M<br />
M<br />
M<br />
Moderate<br />
178. The residual risk rating is moderate as a few major off-line supply contracts are<br />
proposed to be funded under the project. Direct payment by the <strong>Bank</strong> under special commitment<br />
will be availed in specific cases (which has been used under MUTP-1). There are five supply and<br />
installation, two goods and seven technical assistance contracts which are subject to prior review<br />
by the <strong>Bank</strong>. Independent third-party consultants will be appointed 37 to certify the quality and<br />
progress of work and acceptability of the equipment/ works on periodic basis. Equipment<br />
procured/ constructed under the project will be handed over to WR/ CR after commissioning and<br />
joint review by CR/WR and MRVC.<br />
179. Arrangements for Oversight and Accountability: MRVC will be responsible for<br />
the FM arrangements of the project. At the helm of affairs of MRVC is the Board of Directors<br />
(Board). As per the Memorandum and Articles of Association (MAA) of the Company the<br />
maximum number of directors is 11. The Chairman is part time. The Managing Director is<br />
supported by three full-time directors (Technical, Projects and Finance); two part-time directors<br />
(Resettlement and Rehabilitation and Infrastructure and Commercial Development); two parttime<br />
official directors and one part-time non-official director. There is scope for the appointment<br />
of one more part-time non-official director, since there is provision in the MAA for two part-time<br />
non-official directors (independent directors) 38 . The Board meets quarterly 39 . It is assisted by a<br />
full-time Company Secretary and Heads of Departments.<br />
180. There is a Board level audit committee set up in accordance with the requirements<br />
of section 292A of the Companies Act 1956 with three members – Director (Technical), and two<br />
part time official directors. Thus there are no independent directors in the present audit<br />
committee and the audit committee meetings are held twice annually against quarterly prescribed<br />
by department of public enterprises (DPE) guidelines 40 . MRVC will (i) induct the existing nonofficial<br />
Director in the audit committee and request GOM to nominate a non-official Director<br />
who would then be inducted in the audit committee (ii) designate one of the non-official<br />
directors to function as the Chairman of the audit committee and (iii) increase the frequency of<br />
the audit committee meeting to four times in a year in due course of time.<br />
37 MRVC appoints the following agencies/ individuals for inspection: RDSO (for prototypes); Resident <strong>Railway</strong><br />
Advisors (for imported products) and RITES (for locally manufactured products/ works). MRVC’s engineering team<br />
also carries out inspection of works.<br />
38 The provision for two part time non official Directors is less than the required number of four or one-third of the<br />
Board strength as prescribed by the Department of Public Enterprises (DPE) in the corporate governance code for<br />
central public sector undertakings (CPSUs). Implementing this provision would require restructuring the Board of<br />
MRVC. MRVC has requested the <strong>Railway</strong> Board to approach DPE for relaxation of the provision.<br />
39 There is monthly review of MRVC works by MD and coordination meeting at 45 days interval between MRVC,<br />
CR, WR and GOM to review progress of MUTP.<br />
40 DPE’s code on corporate governance for CPSUs prescribes that two-thirds of the audit committee members<br />
should be independent directors and that the chairman of the audit committee should be an independent director.<br />
Further, the charter of audit committee has been defined by MRVC which also defines the frequency of meetings (at<br />
least two meetings) and the scope of the audit committee (covers review of internal controls, financial statements<br />
and half-yearly reports, internal and statutory audit reports etc). The frequency of meeting of the audit committee is<br />
less compared to the DPE guidelines which prescribe at least four meetings annually.<br />
61
181. A detailed Project Implementation Manual will be in place which will provide the<br />
structure, systems and procedures, controls and reporting arrangements for overall project<br />
management of MUTP-2A including FM and contract management.<br />
182. Fund Flow: MUTP-2A will be financed through IBRD Loan and counterpart<br />
funds from IR and GOM. IR and GOM will share equally the cost of the project as well as the<br />
proceeds of the loan and its repayment. The counterpart funding will also be on a 50:50 cost<br />
sharing basis. To contribute to the repayment of the loan IR has levied a surcharge on suburban<br />
rail tickets in <strong>Mumbai</strong> area being collected by WR and CR. 50 percent of the surcharge collected<br />
will be made available to MOF representing MOR’s contribution to the consolidated fund of<br />
India towards servicing of the MOR’s share of the loan and the remaining 50 percent of the<br />
surcharge collected will be passed on to GOM through MRVC, or adjusted against funds<br />
receivable from GOM. The expenditures of the project from the proceeds of the loan as well as<br />
from counterpart funds are routed through MRVC (see Chart 1).<br />
Chart 1. Fund Flow Arrangements<br />
Legend<br />
Loan disbursement<br />
Loan repayment<br />
Grant by IR/GOM<br />
IBRD Loan<br />
Ministry of Finance/<br />
Govt. of India<br />
GOM<br />
955 cr. 955 cr.<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong><br />
IR<br />
1. Loan 1,910<br />
1,200 cr.<br />
Jointly taken by IR & GOM<br />
2. Counterpart Funding<br />
1,200 cr.<br />
Grant by IR 1,200<br />
GOM 1,200<br />
3. TOTAL (Rs. Crore) 4,311<br />
Rolling Stock<br />
Fleet Increase<br />
DC to AC<br />
Conversion<br />
Maintenance<br />
Facilities<br />
Stabling Lines<br />
Technical<br />
Assistance<br />
Levy of surcharge<br />
collected by CR & WR<br />
62
183. The project will be funded through budget releases to MRVC by MOR/ IR and<br />
GOM as in the case of MUTP-1. Separate budget codes will be established for the purpose by<br />
MRVC. The <strong>Bank</strong> loan will finance (i) procurement of electrical equipment for rolling stock, (ii)<br />
off line works including setting up of new traction sub-stations and switching posts, procurement<br />
of digital axle counters and catenary maintenance equipment and (iii) technical assistance for<br />
studies for sustainable expansion of rail services; programs for improving passenger convenience<br />
and information; plans for improving safety and environmental management of operations;<br />
capacity for increased operational efficiency; and training. The remaining supplies and works<br />
will be counterpart funded: manufacture of trains at Chennai ICF; new traction substations, EMU<br />
maintenance facilities and stabling lines and on-line works under AC/DC conversion. The<br />
detailed project cost and sharing between IBRD and counterpart are provided in Annex 4. The<br />
executing agencies – CR, WR, ICF and RDSO will prepare estimates for the expenditure on the<br />
relevant sub-projects in their annual budgets and inform MRVC. MRVC will prepare the<br />
consolidated annual project budget/ expenditure schedule taking into account the inputs from the<br />
executing agencies and notify both MOR and GOM for creating necessary budget provisions.<br />
184. Each year after passing of the <strong>Railway</strong> Budget, the <strong>Railway</strong> Board will issue a<br />
sanction order allotting funds to MUTP-2A and authorizing transfer of funds to MRVC for<br />
further re-allocation and transfer of funds to the executing agencies concerned. GoM’s annual<br />
budget will create a budget head for MUTP-2A under the Urban Development Department for<br />
receiving the Additional Central Assistance from GoI and passing it on to MRVC through<br />
MMRDA. MMRDA’s annual budget estimates will provide for receipt of ACA and counterpart<br />
funds from GoM, and its disbursement to MRVC. Funds for the project will be received by<br />
MRVC through quarterly releases by MOR/ IR and from GOM against periodic demands by<br />
MRVC. MRVC will maintain a common bank account and will book for the resources and<br />
expenditures by project and activity and report to the <strong>Bank</strong> through IUFR.<br />
185. Based on funds requirement of the various executing agencies, MRVC will<br />
provide advances and the executing agencies will submit expenditure statements on periodic<br />
basis. The MOU between the executing agencies and MRVC will regulate the periodic fund flow<br />
and reporting including submission of annual audit report on expenditure statements by the<br />
executing agencies.<br />
186. Disbursement Arrangements: The table below shows disbursement categories and<br />
loan financing percentages:<br />
Expenditure Category<br />
Amount<br />
(US$ million)<br />
Financing Percentage<br />
1. Goods, Supply and Installation 412.364<br />
Rolling Stock Procurement 355.696 100%<br />
DC to AC Conversion 55.155 100%<br />
Simulation software 1.513 100%<br />
2. Consultant Services and Training 12.894 100%<br />
Total 425.258<br />
Front end Fee 1.075<br />
Unallocated 3.667<br />
Total 430.000<br />
63
187. The IBRD funds will flow to MOR/ IR (as a budget grant) and GOM (through<br />
ACA) from MOF. IBRD will advance an amount equivalent to six months forecast expenditure<br />
which will be deposited in the Designated Account that will be opened by MOF. Subsequent<br />
disbursements by the <strong>Bank</strong> will be routed through the Designated Account. Disbursements by<br />
IBRD would be made on the basis of the quarterly IUFRs 41 submitted by MRVC. Disbursement<br />
options would include IUFR-based advances against forecasts, reimbursements, direct payment<br />
to suppliers including special commitments/ letters of credit. Supporting documentation,<br />
including completion reports, certifications, bills and other documentation will be retained by<br />
MRVC and made available to the <strong>Bank</strong> during project supervision. These would also be audited<br />
as a part of annual project financial statements audit and subject to routine internal audit.<br />
Retroactive financing of up to 20 percent of project cost will be available under the project for<br />
payments made within 12 months prior to the date of the legal agreement and to be eligible, the<br />
activities should be procured as per <strong>Bank</strong> guidelines on procurement.<br />
188. IBRD Project Accounting: The number of transactions under the IBRD financed<br />
project is expected to be few large and bulky transactions except the payments under TA<br />
component. All contractual payments for the project will be made after due verification of the<br />
bills in accordance with the procedures laid down in the accounting manual as updated by the<br />
company/ project implementation manual. The project would have a separate trial balance and<br />
financial statement which will help in distinguishing costs financed by the proposed <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong><br />
loan.<br />
189. Separate general and sub-ledger codes will also be established to capture MUTP-<br />
2A budget and expenditure category/ component/ contract wise for monitoring and reporting to<br />
facilitate monitoring of budgeted and actual expenditure of the project on periodic basis, analysis<br />
of variances and corrective actions. The project budget and variances will also be reflected in the<br />
quarterly interim un-audited financial report (IUFR) of the project and the balance in hand would<br />
be reconciled with the project bank statement.<br />
190. Supplier bills will be checked and authorized by competent authority and<br />
independent inspector as specified for the project. Project progress and milestone completion<br />
will be independently certified before payment. Project finance personnel will check bills and<br />
pass them for payment in accordance with the agreements/ work orders, pre-dispatch inspection<br />
reports (for supply contracts), inspection certificates, measurement books, and original bills etc.,<br />
as per contractual provisions. All original bills and related documents and records etc will be<br />
maintained by MRVC accounts and will be subject to both internal and statutory audit.<br />
191. Following laid down procedures, project monitoring will be carried out on a<br />
regular basis. Suitable project monitoring software will be used 42 as a monitoring tool by project<br />
in charge and quarterly progress reports in both physical and financial terms will be provided to<br />
the <strong>Bank</strong> through the IUFR.<br />
192. As long as the loan is open, IUFR in an agreed format will be required giving<br />
details of funds received (IBRD and counterpart) project expenditure incurred during the quarter,<br />
year-to-date and project-to-date indicating separately expenditure out of IBRD funds and<br />
counterpart funds and comparing them with budgets and variances; project trial balance;<br />
41 MRVC would have the flexibility of furnishing reports earlier (say on a monthly basis) to seek early<br />
replenishments wherein they could also provide forecasts for a shorter period than six months.<br />
42 MRVC currently uses MS Project software for project monitoring and is considering Prima Vera under its<br />
computerization plan.<br />
64
projected IBRD funds requirement in the next two quarters; summary of claims and<br />
disbursements under IBRD; progress of contracting and contract payments; physical and<br />
financial progress of the project. The financial information in IUFR will be based on MRVC’s<br />
financial systems and submitted to both project management and IBRD. The annual project<br />
financial statements, which would be similar to the format of the IUFR would be audited and<br />
submitted to the <strong>Bank</strong> and disclosed in the website. The procedures will be clearly laid down in<br />
the Project Implementation Manual.<br />
193. Assets Procured/ Constructed under the Project: <strong>Railway</strong> assets procured/ created<br />
under the MUTP-1 project by MRVC are the property of Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s and under their<br />
safeguard and control. The railway assets under construction appear in MRVC’s books as capital<br />
work in progress subject to joint inspection and these are handed over to CR/ WR after<br />
commissioning 43 .<br />
194. Project Contract Management: Each contract will be assigned a project manager<br />
(PM) who will be the authorized representative of the employer responsible for contract<br />
management. The project implementation manual provides guidelines on contract management<br />
and specifies responsibility of the PM 44 , contractor, submission of detailed work program,<br />
monitoring of status of clearances, monitoring of work execution and periodic review of work<br />
progress. MRVC is using MS Projects for contract monitoring.<br />
195. R&R Payments: There is no R&R envisaged under MUTP-2A. However in the<br />
event of the need for land acquisition, MRVC will take necessary steps in consultation with<br />
GOM and MMRDA will handle R&R under the existing arrangement prescribed for MUTP-1.<br />
Both land acquisition and R&R will be counterpart funded. In the event of any R&R related<br />
payments, the fund flow and accountability arrangements would be agreed and reviewed from<br />
FM perspective in advance.<br />
MRVC Financial Management Arrangements<br />
196. Staffing: The FM function is headed by a Director, Finance and supported by<br />
Financial Advisor and Chief Accounts Officer (FA&CAO). The latter is assisted by two Senior<br />
Accounts Officers (SAOs) one of whom is the Coordinator for the <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> MUTP-1 project;<br />
a Chartered Accountant (appointed as a Retainer); eight Senior Section Officers (SSOs); an<br />
Accounts Assistant; and three Consultants (retired officials). The total staff strength of the<br />
Department is 13, all on deputation from Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s for periods ranging from three to five<br />
years. The present staff members have accounting background and experience. It is proposed to<br />
strengthen FM with an additional Deputy FA&CAO reporting to the FA&CAO and supported by<br />
43 MRVC’s own assets comprising furniture, office equipment etc and construction of leased flats are accounted for<br />
and depreciated in accordance with Companies Act requirements. Fixed assets registers are being maintained and<br />
physical verification of assets are carried out periodically.<br />
44 These include ensuring the execution of project as per the scope of the work, setting the standards to which the<br />
work shall be constructed and completed, authorizing payments, approving any variations or design changes within<br />
the overall scope of the work; maintain proper records for quality, inspection, rejection or acceptance of work, and<br />
make available such records as may be called for by the Employer. PM to also ensure that bank/ performance<br />
guarantees, insurance policies and powers of attorneys are submitted on time, that provisions relating to extension of<br />
contract, quality assurance, safety, environmental protection provisions, liquidated damages, etc. are adhered to, that<br />
extension of the completion period and provisions of liquidated damages are imposed as per the delegation of<br />
powers of MRVC and that disputes are handled as per contractual provisions.<br />
65
three Senior Accounts Officers. The Deputy FA&CAO will also act as the Coordinator for<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> projects. A staffing and training needs assessment based on current and future<br />
workload is being worked out by MRVC 45 . The present budget on training is INR 25 lakhs<br />
approx. which is expected to go up to INR 50 lakhs to include MRVC training. The TA<br />
component under the project provides for training of FM staff in financial management and<br />
project management. The details are being worked out.<br />
197. The major elements of financial management accountability framework are in<br />
place in MRVC. There is an accounting manual issued in January 2004 which provides broad<br />
guidelines on the FM arrangements in MRVC for MUTP-1. There is scope for updating and<br />
further detailing the budgeting, fund flow, project accounting and management, and internal<br />
audit sections in the manual. This has been agreed with MRVC and the revised manual will be in<br />
place by July 2010.<br />
198. Budgeting and Performance Review: MRVC prepares annual capital expenditure<br />
budget and annual administrative budget. Annual project works expenditure budget is based on<br />
annual project work-plans of MRVC and other executing agencies (eg CR, WR, ICF, and<br />
RDSO). The works expenditure budget is approved by the MD and forwarded to the <strong>Railway</strong><br />
Board. Review of budget against actual expenditure is carried out in August, December (revised<br />
estimate) and February (final modification) with information from all executing agencies. For<br />
variations from the budget, approvals are obtained in advance from the budget approving<br />
authority. Annual administrative budget of MRVC is approved by the Board. Quarterly<br />
administrative expenditure reports comparing actual expenditure against budget are presented to<br />
the Board. MRVC may consider elaborating on the existing budget preparation guidelines<br />
contained in the accounting manual with more detailed instructions regarding the preparation and<br />
monitoring of project budgets including formats of reports. Quarterly rolling cash forecasts may<br />
be considered to strengthen management of funds.<br />
199. Accounting and Internal Controls: Accounting is carried out in MRVC Head<br />
Office. There are no other accounting units. Accounting is based on accrual principles and in<br />
accordance with accounting standards issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India.<br />
There is an accounting manual which was last updated in December 2003. The manual lays<br />
down bill passing and payment procedures. An off-the-shelf accounting software package (Tally<br />
9) is being used for day to day accounting and periodic financial reporting. Half-yearly accounts<br />
are prepared and presented to the audit committee and the Board for review.<br />
200. In the areas of accounting and internal controls the rudiments such as schedule of<br />
powers 46 , chart of accounts, accounting policies and standards, brief accounting and procurement<br />
guidelines have been laid down in the accounting manual which was last updated in December<br />
2003. There is a need to further update relevant sections of the manual. There is also scope for<br />
45 The Chief Personnel Officer (CPO) is responsible for human resource management in MRVC. He is assisted by a<br />
Deputy and two supervisors. MRVC follows DPE guidelines and <strong>Railway</strong>s manuals for human resource<br />
management. List of training programs have been identified including and the training institutes. Training needs<br />
assessment is carried out by the HoD/ Director concerned. The training program includes training on <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong><br />
procurement procedures conducted by ASCI and NIFM. Further, MRVC proposes to send officers for the <strong>Railway</strong>s<br />
mandatory training.<br />
46 According to the Delegation of Procurement Powers, (i) in respect of program of capital expenditure (works<br />
sanctioned by <strong>Railway</strong> Board) MRVC is delegated powers for incurring expenditure up to Rs.150 crores on any<br />
program of capital expenditure; and (ii) in respect of purchase and placement of contracts of a major nature<br />
involving a substantial capital outlay MRVC is delegated powers for incurring expenditure up to Rs.100 crores for<br />
purchase/placement of contract of a major nature involving a substantial capital outlay.<br />
66
more detailed guidelines pertaining to accounting and controls to strengthen the financial<br />
management framework - for instance there are no instructions/ guidelines regarding project<br />
accounting (receipt of funds, disbursement and utilization thereof and reporting 47 ) in the manual<br />
which is the primary activity of MRVC.<br />
201. Management Reporting: There is formal reporting of half-yearly financial<br />
statements of MRVC to the audit committee and the Board 48 . Capital budget reviews are carried<br />
out in August, December and February. Administrative budget performance report and progress<br />
on sanctioned ongoing works of MUTP-1 are submitted to the Board on quarterly basis<br />
indicating both financial and physical progress of projects. There is monthly review of MRVC<br />
works by MD and a bi-monthly coordination meeting between MRVC, CR, WR, GOM and other<br />
executing agencies to review progress of MUTP-1. In addition MRVC submits monthly report<br />
on activities to the <strong>Railway</strong> Board.<br />
202. There is scope for MRVC to further elaborate on management reporting in the<br />
accounting manual with formats of reports and instructions for their preparation. MRVC may<br />
consider introducing quarterly reporting of financial results to the Board to match the frequency<br />
of progress reviews. MRVC plans to introduce quarterly reporting once the reporting from the<br />
executing agencies on a quarterly basis in an acceptable format is formally established. MRVC<br />
may also consider carrying out a formal assessment of reporting requirements to ensure that<br />
financial and operational reports that are needed are generated and in the form that facilitates<br />
decision-making. The assessment of organization wide reporting requirements could cover<br />
reports required by (i) top, middle and operating levels of management (ii) statutory and<br />
regulatory authorities (iii) lending agencies etc. and could be combined with the proposed<br />
computerization of MIS.<br />
203. Computerization: MRVC maintains its accounts in Tally 9, which is an off the<br />
shelf accounting software. A separate payroll package has been installed. There is a financial<br />
management system (FMS) which is used for preparing the quarterly progress report (QPR) on<br />
MUTP-1 for submission to the <strong>Bank</strong>. The FMS is an excel-spreadsheet where the non financial<br />
data is manually input and the financial data is downloaded into the spreadsheet. MRVC<br />
management may consider upgrading its computerized systems with appropriate project<br />
management and reporting software which could be integrated with the existing financial<br />
accounting system to generate management reports. MRVC has outsourced the assessment of<br />
computerization needs to be followed by a roadmap for implementation 49 .<br />
Entity Corporate Governance<br />
204. The DPE, Government of India has issued a code of corporate governance for<br />
CPSUs irrespective of whether or not they are listed in the stock exchange 50 . Although MRVC<br />
has implemented corporate governance practices in compliance with relevant provisions of the<br />
Companies Act 1956 it is yet to fully comply with the practices mandated by the DPE guidelines.<br />
47 MRVC’s lack of familiarity with <strong>Bank</strong> procedures for special commitments under MUTP-1 and GOI requirements<br />
in this respect has resulted in payment of/ demand for significant amount of penal interest (INR 5 crores approx.) to<br />
MoF. Detailed guidelines are being incorporated in both the project implementation manual and the finance manuals<br />
to avoid any recurrences.<br />
48 This is reportedly delayed due to delays in receiving expenditure statements from the other executing agencies of<br />
MUTP.<br />
49 L&T Infotech has been appointed to prepare the assessment and road map.<br />
50 The aim is to institutionalize good corporate governance practices that are broadly in conformity with SEBI<br />
guidelines.<br />
67
In the following table, the key components of the model code of corporate governance<br />
(applicable to a CPSU) and the present status in MRVC is presented.<br />
Table 1: Status of Draft Model Code on Corporate Governance in MRVC<br />
DPE code<br />
Board of directors shall have an optimum combination<br />
of functional, nominee and independent directors. The<br />
number of functional directors (including CMD/MD)<br />
should not exceed 50 percent of the actual strength of<br />
the board.<br />
The number of nominee directors shall be restricted to<br />
a maximum of two.<br />
In case of CPSEs listed in stock exchanges, the number<br />
of independent directors shall be at least 50 percent of<br />
board members. In case of CPSEs not listed in the<br />
stock exchanges at least one third of the board<br />
members should be independent directors (part-time<br />
directors) 51 .<br />
Qualified and independent audit committee 52 shall be<br />
set up giving the terms of reference with minimum<br />
three directors as members; Two thirds of the members<br />
of audit committee shall be independent directors; The<br />
chairman of the audit committee shall be an<br />
independent director.<br />
Audit committees should meet at least four times in a<br />
year and not more than four months shall elapse<br />
between two meetings.<br />
Risk management strategies and their oversight shall be<br />
one of the main responsibilities of the board and<br />
management 53 . Disclosure on risks and concerns should<br />
from part of Director’s report.<br />
Present MRVC status<br />
The current strength of the Board is ten as follows:<br />
Chairman<br />
MD<br />
Three full time directors<br />
Four part time official directors<br />
One part time non official director<br />
The number of functional directors including Chairman<br />
and MD is 50 percent of the current Board strength. The<br />
number of government nominee (part time official<br />
directors) exceeds the restricted level. The number of<br />
independent directors (part time non official directors)<br />
falls short of the required one-third of the Board members<br />
by two.<br />
There is an audit committee set up under the provisions of<br />
the Companies Act 1956. The audit committee has three<br />
members. There are no independent directors in the audit<br />
committee. The chairman of the audit committee is not an<br />
independent director.<br />
All members of the audit committee possess technical<br />
knowledge and expertise but no knowledge of financial<br />
matters.<br />
Audit committee mandate is to meet twice a year<br />
There is no formal risk management system in place. The<br />
management considers monitoring and achieving MOU<br />
target as part of enterprise risk management.<br />
The guidelines provide a list of minimum information<br />
that is required to be placed before the board 54 and<br />
included in the report on corporate governance in the<br />
annual report of the company 55 .<br />
Half-yearly results of MRVC are placed before the Board.<br />
There is no report on corporate governance in the annual<br />
report of MRVC and no certificate of compliance with<br />
corporate governance norms.<br />
51 Nominee directors appointed by an institution which has invested in or lent to the company shall be deemed to be<br />
independent directors<br />
52 All members of audit committee shall have knowledge of financial matters of company and at least one member<br />
shall have good knowledge of accounting and related financial management expertise. Detailed and elaborate role<br />
has been prescribed for audit committees including, financial performance, reporting and disclosures; internal<br />
control mechanisms (including internal audit); compliance with audit observations (internal as well as statutory);<br />
whistle blower mechanism etc<br />
53 On risk management the board shall ensure the integration and alignment of the risk management system with the<br />
corporate and operational objectives and also that risk management is undertaken as a part of normal business<br />
practice and not as a separate task at set times. The company shall lay down procedures to inform board members<br />
about the risk assessment and minimization procedures. These procedures shall be periodically reviewed to ensure<br />
that executive management controls risks through means of a properly defined framework. Procedure shall be laid<br />
down for internal risk management also.<br />
54 The list includes quarterly results for the company and its operating divisions or business segments (Annex IV).<br />
55 Annex VII to the guidelines provides a list of items to be included in the report on corporate governance in the<br />
annual report of companies. The company is also required to obtain a certificate from either the auditors or<br />
practicing company secretary regarding compliance of conditions of corporate governance as stipulated in the<br />
guidelines.<br />
68
Actions for Improving Corporate Governance<br />
205. During discussions with MRVC it was felt that the validity clause (life of 15 years<br />
for the entity) has come in the way of a long term vision and plans for the organization. The<br />
organization will complete 15 years in 2014. However there is strong likelihood of the validity<br />
period being extended/ removed. Nevertheless as long as MRVC functions as a CPSU, corporate<br />
governance norms prescribed by DPE for CPSUs would be applicable and therefore MRVC may<br />
consider taking appropriate steps to comply with these requirements.<br />
206. Independent directors: MRVC may engage MOR and DPE in restructuring the<br />
Board composition to accommodate the required number of independent directors with at least<br />
one finance professional among them 56 . In the interim, the remaining non-official director may<br />
be appointed to the Board by GOM.<br />
207. Audit committee: In the short term, induct the present independent director (nonofficial<br />
director) in the audit committee and enlarge audit committee charter and frequency of<br />
meetings as prescribed by the guidelines. On the appointment of the second non-official director<br />
s/he may be inducted in the audit committee. Otherwise MRVC may consider appointment of<br />
eminent person/s in an organizational committee to inject an element of independence and<br />
external and impartial debate in the proceedings/ decision making.<br />
208. Risk management: In the area of risk management, the corporate governance<br />
framework requires MRVC to develop suitable strategies for risk identification, assessment and<br />
mitigation. Risk factors that could have adverse bearing on MRVC’s functions, performance and<br />
reputation should be identified and managed. MRVC does have a brief corporate plan laying<br />
down vision/ mission and objectives, and the frame work of MUTP-1, 2 and beyond, however,<br />
there are no long term operational and risk management strategies and no plan projections for the<br />
MUTP life cycle. MRVC operates more on a ‘project to project mode’ with short term/ ad hoc<br />
plans (e.g., implementation of MUTP-1, followed by 2A) rather than as a business concern with<br />
long term plans and organization (e.g., the entire MUTP project). This is largely due to the<br />
limited validity period prescribed which is now proposed to be dropped 57 . Since the entity’s life<br />
is being proposed to be extended, the need for risk management needs to be viewed in the longer<br />
term perspective for MRVC based on its future role and suitable risk identification, mitigation<br />
and monitoring strategies need to be put in place. Major risks for MRVC as project<br />
implementation agency are time and cost over-run, quality of equipment and works, several<br />
executing agencies not under the control of MRVC; important income source for GOM/MOR is<br />
levy of surcharge collected by CR and WR – changes in this may affect financing capacity;<br />
resettlement of project affected families may delay project implementation etc. In the area of<br />
governance, absence of independent and objective viewpoint in decision making, inadequate<br />
capacity/ vacancies/ continuity of staff as MRVC is staffed by personnel on deputation etc are<br />
risks. For enterprise risks suitable mitigation measures need to be developed, monitored and<br />
reported. MRVC needs to chalk out a plan for risk assessment and mitigation externally aided if<br />
necessary and weave in risk monitoring into its internal audit framework 58 .<br />
56 The CAG while reviewing unlisted companies with the objective of assessing compliance with DPE guidelines<br />
has observed that MRVC does not fulfill the requirement of 1/3 rd of independent directors.<br />
57 Article 177 of the MAA stipulates the period of validity up to July 11 2014. MRVC has applied to the <strong>Railway</strong><br />
Board and GOM for deleting the article (letters dated January 15 2010)<br />
58 The Dedicated Freight Corridor <strong>Corporation</strong> of India Limited has developed a risk management strategy which<br />
proposes detailed risk register along with a risk management team.<br />
69
Internal Audit<br />
209. Internal audit is carried out by a firm of chartered accountants under terms of<br />
reference issued by MRVC. The internal audit is continuous 59 and quarterly internal audit reports<br />
are submitted to MRVC. Coordination for internal audit is the responsibility of an SAO reporting<br />
to FA&CAO. Internal audit reports together with management response are reviewed by the<br />
audit committee and by the Board. The statutory auditors have opined that the company has an<br />
adequate internal audit system commensurate with the size and nature of its business.<br />
210. From a review of internal audit reports by the <strong>Bank</strong> it appears that the internal<br />
auditors are more focused on day-to-day accounting transactions and thereby fulfilling only a<br />
part of the scope of work relating to transaction reviews. However the internal audit scope of<br />
work requires the auditors to also (i) visit various field offices (ii) assess the adequacy of project<br />
financial management systems including internal controls and remedying weak controls etc (iii)<br />
assess compliance with provisions of financing agreements (iv) judge adequacy of records<br />
maintained regarding assets created and (v) certify eligibility of expenditures charged to projects<br />
and its correct classification and (vi) prepare internal control manual. These areas are not<br />
adequately addressed by internal audit. MRVC appointed new internal auditors from October 1<br />
2009 and monitor the quality of the audit and deliverables.<br />
211. MRVC may consider preparing a detailed internal audit manual to serve as the<br />
basis for internal audit. The audit manual would set out the objectives, scope and coverage of<br />
audit, the detailed methodology of review, audit questionnaires, and the required reporting and<br />
follow up. The internal audit would need to be organization wide (covering project funding,<br />
procurement and projects construction in addition to accounting) and oriented towards mitigating<br />
risks and improving/ strengthening relevant systems and controls. The internal auditors should<br />
also possess the specific skills and experience required to carry out the audit which should go<br />
beyond traditional financial audit. MRVC has assigned the responsibility of developing both the<br />
internal audit and finance manuals to the internal auditors.<br />
212. The IBRD financed MUTP-2A will be subject to internal audit (under agreed<br />
terms of reference) and its reports would be made available to IBRD, on request.<br />
External Audit<br />
213. Under Section 619(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, the Comptroller and Auditor<br />
General (CAG) appoints MRVC’s statutory auditors to carry out an independent audit and<br />
express their opinion as per the requirements of the Companies Act. In addition, the CAG<br />
through its Principal Director of Commercial Audit also conducts supplementary audit under<br />
section 619 (3) (b) of the Companies Act on the audited financial statements. After the<br />
completion of the statutory audit and supplementary audit the audited accounts and auditors’<br />
reports are adopted by the Annual General Meeting of MRVC. Statutory audits of MRVC are on<br />
schedule. The statutory audit reports do not contain any material observations 60 .<br />
59 The internal auditors are required to spend at least two working days every week and the Partner/ Director at least<br />
once a week at MRVC.<br />
60 The 2007-08 audit report points out that accounting of provisions for retirement benefits of employees on<br />
deputation is not on actuarial valuation as prescribed under AS-15. This is being addressed by the management. Also<br />
the auditors have pointed out in their opinion that MRVC has placed reliance on audited/ unaudited statements<br />
pertaining to expenditure incurred on various projects by CR/ WR/ MMRDA and the resultant D&G charges.<br />
70
214. In addition to the audits under the Companies Act MRVC is subject to proprietary<br />
audit/ inspection by the Office of the Principal Director of Commercial Audit. While the<br />
inspection report for FY 2007-08 did not observe any persistent irregularities, the inspection<br />
report for FY 2006-07 contained several observations. MRVC management has responded to the<br />
observations which pertain to project/ contract management and violation of existing guidelines<br />
etc. Only one objection is yet to be resolved 61 .<br />
215. Annual project audit: In addition to the annual entity audit report and accounts,<br />
MRVC would submit to the <strong>Bank</strong> a separate annual project audit report along with the audited<br />
project financial statements by September 30 each year during the currency of the project. It is<br />
proposed that the project (including all components) will be audited by an independent firm of<br />
chartered accountants (which may include the statutory auditors appointed on the advice of<br />
CAG), acceptable to the <strong>Bank</strong>, under agreed terms of reference. The annual audited project<br />
financial statement would separately identify each component under the project, its progress and<br />
the funding sources for each of the components. While certifying the project financial statements<br />
the project auditor would take cognizance of the annual audited utilization statements of the<br />
executing agencies receiving advances from MRVC under the project. The following annual<br />
audit reports will be tracked by the <strong>Bank</strong>’s Audit Reports Compliance System (ARCS):<br />
Table 2. Audit Reports Monitoring<br />
Agency Audit Report Audited By Due Date<br />
MRVC Annual entity audit reports as required under<br />
the Companies Act<br />
Statutory Auditors appointed by<br />
CAG<br />
MRVC Project audit reports Independent firm of Chartered<br />
Accountants<br />
GOI Audit Report of the Designated Account held CAG<br />
at RBI<br />
30 th<br />
September<br />
30 th<br />
September<br />
30 th<br />
September<br />
Disclosure, Transparency and Implementation of Rights to Information (RTI) Act, 2005<br />
216. Under Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 a public authority is required to<br />
maintain and make available detailed records to facilitate right to information. It envisages<br />
computerization of records and accessibility through network. The Act also requires every public<br />
authority to, designate required number of Public Information Officers, in all administrative units<br />
or offices under it and publish particulars of such officers to provide information to persons<br />
requesting for it under the Act.<br />
217. MRVC has developed a separate RTI website. Information relating to the<br />
company, powers/ duties, rules and regulations etc has been posted on the website including<br />
names and contact information of public information officers/ appellate officer.<br />
218. There is a separate vigilance cell in the organization headed by Chief Vigilance<br />
Officer/ Deputy Chief Vigilance Officer. Notifications are issued by Chief Vigilance<br />
Commissioner from time to time.<br />
61<br />
Audit observations and current status: Delay in implementation of MUTP-1, cost overrun of Rs.350.6 crores in<br />
implementation and levy of surcharge of Rs.298.84 crores without providing any additional facilities; (the para is<br />
still open);<br />
71
219. MRVC discloses annual audited statement of accounts in the website. It is a<br />
limited view of the Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account only. During project<br />
implementation the audited project financial statements and other pertinent project-related details<br />
would be disclosed in the website in a suitable manner.<br />
Proposed action plan<br />
220. The proposed action plan with risk assessment and implementation horizon is<br />
summarized below in Table 3. The proposed actions are bifurcated between those that are under<br />
the control of MRVC and its management and those that are under the control of other<br />
stakeholders and prioritized over short to medium term<br />
221. If MRVC faces constraints in staffing while trying to implement some of the<br />
proposed actions as listed below it may consider seeking assistance from reputed and<br />
experienced consultants (or / eminent persons from the sector) in its efforts to further improve<br />
financial accountability and corporate governance.<br />
Table 3. Financial Management Action Plan<br />
Area of Action Risk Actions required<br />
for<br />
implementation<br />
Internal audit<br />
Strengthen internal audit<br />
arrangements in line with<br />
own requirements and<br />
good industry practices;<br />
develop appropriate<br />
internal audit manual<br />
Audit Committee<br />
Induct independent<br />
directors in audit<br />
committee or invite<br />
independent professionals<br />
(in an advisory capacity)<br />
to inject professional<br />
independence and improve<br />
oversight<br />
Action by,<br />
Date<br />
Actions within the control of MRVC (short term)<br />
Internal controls and<br />
risk management are<br />
weakened without a<br />
robust internal review<br />
and follow-up<br />
mechanism<br />
Assurance function is<br />
impaired without<br />
independent review<br />
and recommendation;<br />
risk of ineffective<br />
controls may lead to<br />
future problems<br />
Ensure adherence to<br />
terms of reference by<br />
internal auditors<br />
Develop detailed<br />
internal audit manual<br />
with enlarged scope<br />
covering project/<br />
contract<br />
implementation and<br />
focus on risk<br />
management/<br />
systems<br />
improvement<br />
Induct two<br />
independent (nonofficial)<br />
directors in<br />
the audit committee<br />
2009-10 internal<br />
audit<br />
Final report by<br />
July 2010.<br />
As soon as<br />
appointed as<br />
Board nonofficial<br />
directors.<br />
Remarks<br />
New auditors<br />
appointed from<br />
October 2009 with<br />
fresh TOR.<br />
Adherence to TOR<br />
to be monitored.<br />
Internal auditors to<br />
prepare internal<br />
audit manual. To be<br />
shared with the<br />
<strong>Bank</strong><br />
Serving non-official<br />
director to retire in<br />
May 2010. MRVC<br />
has requested GOM<br />
and MOR to appoint<br />
non-official<br />
directors.<br />
Strengthen oversight by<br />
audit committee in line<br />
with corporate governance<br />
requirements<br />
Increase frequency of<br />
audit committee<br />
meetings to four as<br />
per DPE guidelines<br />
From FY 2011-<br />
12 onwards<br />
Currently meetings<br />
are half-yearly since<br />
financial statements<br />
reporting to the<br />
Board is half-yearly.<br />
MRVC to increase<br />
the frequency with<br />
the introduction of<br />
72
FM capacity<br />
Fill vacancies and train and<br />
build capacity<br />
In-year reporting to<br />
management<br />
Introduce quarterly<br />
financial reporting to BoD<br />
as per corporate<br />
governance requirements<br />
Financial management<br />
Manuals<br />
Update the finance and<br />
accounts manual for a<br />
more formalized and<br />
elaborate coverage of<br />
MRVC’s activities to<br />
strengthen financial<br />
management environment<br />
Computerized MIS<br />
Assess requirements of<br />
organization wide MIS and<br />
prepare computerization<br />
strategy and road map<br />
Inadequate capacity<br />
will affect level of<br />
efficiency and lead to<br />
delays<br />
Proper and adequate<br />
information not<br />
available in timely<br />
fashion for informed<br />
decision making;<br />
delays in corrective<br />
actions<br />
Recruit/ depute staff<br />
as per project<br />
requirement<br />
Prepare un-audited<br />
financial statements<br />
on a quarterly basis<br />
with closing entries<br />
compare with budget<br />
and provide variance<br />
analysis<br />
Replacement<br />
staff in place to<br />
avoid vacancy.<br />
From FY 2011-<br />
12<br />
Inconsistent/<br />
improper practices to<br />
the possible detriment<br />
of the organization;<br />
risk of becoming<br />
person dependent<br />
rather than process<br />
dependent<br />
Initiate action for<br />
updating the<br />
following:<br />
(a) Schedule of<br />
Powers<br />
(b)Budgeting<br />
(c) Project<br />
Accounting<br />
(d) General<br />
Accounting<br />
(e) Internal Controls<br />
(f) Procurement<br />
(g) Contract<br />
Management<br />
(h) Reporting<br />
Final report by<br />
July 2010<br />
Actions within the control of MRVC (medium term)<br />
Failure to get<br />
properly automated<br />
and integrated in a<br />
timely fashion with<br />
consequences - need<br />
for manual<br />
intervention; delays,<br />
duplications and<br />
possibility of errors;<br />
proper and adequate<br />
information not<br />
available in timely<br />
fashion for informed<br />
decision making;<br />
delays in corrective<br />
actions<br />
Develop terms of<br />
reference and<br />
commence work<br />
Computerization<br />
road map to be<br />
ready by May<br />
2010<br />
quarterly financial<br />
statement reporting<br />
to the Board.<br />
Key FM staff slated<br />
to revert to Indian<br />
<strong>Railway</strong>s including<br />
FA&CAO and SAO.<br />
Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s to<br />
ensure proper<br />
addition/replacement<br />
with adequate time<br />
for hand-over.<br />
Currently half yearly<br />
financial statements<br />
are submitted to the<br />
Board; MRVC plans<br />
to increase the<br />
frequency when<br />
acceptable<br />
expenditure<br />
statements are<br />
received from the<br />
executing agencies.<br />
Consultant<br />
appointed to prepare<br />
finance manuals<br />
Assignment<br />
outsourced<br />
73
Actions beyond the control of MRVC but critical from management and corporate<br />
governance perspective<br />
Independent Directors<br />
Induct independent<br />
directors/ eminent<br />
professionals to enhance<br />
the level of corporate<br />
governance<br />
Extension of validity<br />
period of MRVC beyond<br />
2014<br />
Creates impression<br />
that company lacks<br />
independence and that<br />
adequate<br />
professionalism and<br />
objectivity are not<br />
brought into decision<br />
making; noncompliance<br />
with<br />
Departmental<br />
guidelines and<br />
organization’s<br />
Articles of<br />
Association<br />
Lack of lasting vision,<br />
ad-hoc decisions and<br />
barrier to<br />
improvements.<br />
MUTP-2A may not<br />
be fully implemented<br />
within the validity<br />
period<br />
Initiate consultations<br />
with appropriate<br />
authorities<br />
Obtain in principle<br />
approval.<br />
Clear timeline<br />
for appointment<br />
by July 2010<br />
By May 2010<br />
One independent<br />
director in place; to<br />
retire in May 2010.<br />
The number should<br />
be compliant with<br />
DPE guidelines.<br />
74
Annex 8: Procurement Arrangements<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
A. General<br />
222. Procurement for the proposed project would be carried out in accordance with the<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>’s "Guidelines: Procurement Under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits" dated May 2004<br />
revised October 2006 (Procurement Guidelines); and "Guidelines: Selection and Employment of<br />
Consultants by <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Borrowers" dated May 2004 revised October 2006 (Consultant<br />
Guidelines), and the provisions stipulated in the Legal Agreement.<br />
223. The various items under different expenditure categories are described in general<br />
below. For each contract to be financed by the Loan/Credit, the different procurement methods<br />
or consultant selection methods, the need for pre-qualification, estimated costs, prior review<br />
requirements, and time frame are agreed between the Borrower and the <strong>Bank</strong> in the Procurement<br />
Plan. The Procurement Plan will be updated at least annually or as required to reflect the actual<br />
project implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity.<br />
224. Procurement of Goods and Works: There are no Works envisaged to be<br />
procured using <strong>Bank</strong>’s SBDs for Works, at this stage. Goods to be procured under this project<br />
include (i) Electrics for 3-phase EMUs (Rolling Stock) and (ii) OHE Maintenance Car and will<br />
be procured using <strong>Bank</strong>’s SBD for Goods on ICB basis. Procurement of other items include (iii)<br />
Setting up of Traction Substation at Chinchpokli and Sion and six Switching posts, (iv) Supply<br />
and Installation of 110 kV cable for Chinchpokli and Sion traction substations and (v) Digital<br />
Axle Counters and will be done using the <strong>Bank</strong>’s Standard Bidding <strong>Document</strong>s (SBD) for<br />
Supply and Installation on ICB basis. In addition, the Project envisages procurement of<br />
Information System including TA for suburban Rail Simulation Model and Power Supply<br />
Simulation Study, for which the procurement method will be ICB with post qualification, using<br />
<strong>Bank</strong>’s SBD for procurement of Information Systems.<br />
225. Pre-Qualification of Bidders: Procurement of Goods and Works will follow postqualification<br />
of bidders and pre-qualification procedures are not envisaged.<br />
226. Domestic Preference: The project procurement does not envisage providing any<br />
domestic preferences and has adopted the default provisions of the <strong>Bank</strong> SBD.<br />
227. No procurement requiring National Competitive Bidding (NCB) method of<br />
procurement is envisaged under the project, If, however, some smaller value contracts for<br />
Works/ Goods are identified during implementation, these shall be procured using model<br />
documents as agreed with and satisfactory to the <strong>Bank</strong>.NCB contracts, if any, will be awarded in<br />
accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.3 and 3.4 of the Procurement Guidelines<br />
("Guidelines: Procurement Under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits" dated May 2004 revised<br />
October 2006). All NCB contracts to be financed from the proceeds of the loan will follow the<br />
procedures described in Chapter 5 of the MUTP-2A Implementation Manual and the following<br />
conditions shall apply:<br />
a. Only the model bidding documents for NCB agreed with the GOI Task Force<br />
(and as amended from time to time) shall be used for bidding.<br />
b. Invitations to bid shall be advertised in at least one widely circulated national<br />
daily newspaper at least 30 days prior to the deadline for the submission of bids.<br />
75
c. No special preference will be accorded to any bidder either for price or for other<br />
terms and conditions when competing with foreign bidders, state-owned<br />
enterprises, small scale enterprises or enterprises from any given state.<br />
d. Except with the prior concurrence of the <strong>Bank</strong>, there shall be no negotiation of<br />
price with the bidders even with the lowest evaluated bidder.<br />
e. Extension of bid validity shall not be allowed without the prior concurrence of the<br />
<strong>Bank</strong> (i) for the first request for extension if it is longer than four weeks and (ii)<br />
for all subsequent requests for extension irrespective of the period (such<br />
concurrence will be considered by <strong>Bank</strong> only in cases of Force Majeure and<br />
circumstances beyond the control of the project).<br />
f. Re-bidding shall not be carried out without the prior concurrence of the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />
The system of rejecting bids outside a pre-determined margin or “bracket” of<br />
prices shall not be used in the project.<br />
g. Rate contracts entered into by Director General of Supplies and Disposal will not<br />
be acceptable as a substitute for NCB procedures. Such contracts will be<br />
acceptable, however, for any procurement under National Shopping procedures.<br />
h. Two or three envelop system will not be used.<br />
228. Selection of Consultants: Consulting services procured under this project would<br />
include: TA for development program for <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail services, TA to support the<br />
development of Indian <strong>Railway</strong> Long Term Strategy, TA for revenue maximizing study for<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> rail suburban system, TA for suburban ticketing system for Central and Western<br />
<strong>Railway</strong>s, TA for design for passenger information and security within <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban rail<br />
system, and TA for study to improve environmental management of operation of Central and<br />
Western <strong>Railway</strong>s.<br />
229. For all consultant procurement, the <strong>Bank</strong>’s Standard Request for Proposal (SRFP)<br />
document and pertinent Form of Contract shall be used.<br />
230. The following methods of selection will be adopted depending upon size and<br />
complexity of assignment, as defined in the Consultancy Guidelines:<br />
a. Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS)<br />
b. Quality Based Selection (QBS)<br />
c. Selection under Fixed Budget (FBS)<br />
d. Least Cost Selection (LCS)<br />
e. Selection based on Consultant’s Qualifications (CQS)<br />
f. Single Source Selection (SSS)<br />
g. Individuals<br />
231. The services of individual consultants will be procured as per the provisions<br />
stipulated in paragraphs 5.1 to 5.4 of the <strong>Bank</strong>’s Guidelines.<br />
232. Retroactive Financing: The Project has issued some of the Bidding <strong>Document</strong>s<br />
inviting bids for awarded contracts following <strong>Bank</strong>’s Procurement Guidelines and agreed format<br />
of Bidding <strong>Document</strong>s. One contract has already been awarded and others are in various stages<br />
76
of bidding. These contracts if awarded, prior to the project loan effectiveness, as these would<br />
have been prior review contracts, cleared with the <strong>Bank</strong>, will be eligible for retroactive financing<br />
as per the criteria for such funding specified in the Lon Agreement. The amount of funding, if<br />
and where applicable, for such contracts as meeting the criteria, will not exceed 20 percent of the<br />
loan amount.<br />
233. The procurement plan compiled for all the identified packages under the projects<br />
and the consultancies procedures and SBDs to be used for each procurement method, as well as<br />
model contracts for works and goods procured, are presented in Chapter 5 of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban<br />
Transport Project 2A Implementation Manual.<br />
B. Assessment of the agency’s capacity to implement procurement<br />
234. Procurement under the project will be carried out by MRVC. MOR has<br />
implemented <strong>Bank</strong>’s project covered over several loans in modernization of the rail transport.<br />
Generally the officers are aware of the procurement procedures followed in <strong>Bank</strong> financed<br />
projects. MRVC will depute some representatives who will deal with this procurement to the<br />
training programs organized by Administrative Staff College of India (ASCI), National Institute<br />
of Financial Management (NIFM) or other reputed institute for updating their knowledge on<br />
procurement.<br />
235. MRVC has been delegated authority by IR to take procurement decisions for<br />
contracts up to a value of Rs. 1,000 million (approx. US$20 million). All contracts except the<br />
one for the procurement of Electrical Multiple Units (EMUs) and kits shall be within the<br />
threshold of the US$ 200 million. The value of EMU contract is expected to be over US$200<br />
million. In this case, the bid evaluation would be carried out by a committee of MRVC and<br />
RDSO and forwarded to Indian <strong>Railway</strong> Board for review and approval of recommendations.<br />
236. Furthermore, <strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> Limited (MRVC) has<br />
performed satisfactorily compared with the other agencies involved in the implementation of<br />
MUTP-1, both on procurement and implementation of contracts. In the process, MRVC has<br />
acquired reasonable proficiency in procurement capacity following <strong>Bank</strong> guidelines and SBDs.<br />
However, for this project, <strong>Bank</strong>’s revised SBDs (2007 and 2008 for Works, Supply and<br />
installation and Goods procurement) will be applicable. The SBD for Supply and Installation has<br />
substantial changes from the previous version, which was applicable for MUTP-1 and with<br />
which these officials are well versed. In order to familiarize these officers of MRVC, the <strong>Bank</strong><br />
apart from discussions on these bidding documents during missions organized a workshop at<br />
New Delhi, which was attended by senior officers of MRVC. During these discussions and<br />
workshop, several concerns of MRVC officials were clarified. Draft bidding documents for<br />
major procurements covered under the project have already been prepared. One contract has<br />
been awarded and two are in advanced stage of bidding process. The main bidding document for<br />
procurement of Electrics (EMU Rolling Stock) has been issued.<br />
237. The responsibilities of MRVC officials inter-alia include duties pertaining to<br />
Procurement function. The procurement function is staffed by officers of MRVC at various<br />
levels as stated in the table 1 below.<br />
77
NATURE OF<br />
POWERS<br />
Invitation of Works<br />
Tenders<br />
Managing<br />
Director<br />
Table 1. Staffing of Procurement Functions at MRVC<br />
Director<br />
Open tenders/ prequalified<br />
tenderers<br />
Million<br />
Up to INR 250<br />
Limited tenders Up to INR 250<br />
Million<br />
Single tenders Up to INR 50<br />
Million<br />
Accepting authority<br />
Issue of acceptance<br />
letter and signing<br />
of contract<br />
agreement.<br />
Consultancy<br />
Tenders/Contracts<br />
Invitation of<br />
Consultancy<br />
Tenders<br />
Composition of<br />
tenders evaluation<br />
committee.<br />
Accepting<br />
Authority<br />
Variation in<br />
consultancy<br />
contract<br />
Over INR<br />
500 Million<br />
up to INR<br />
1000<br />
Million<br />
Full Powers<br />
Over INR 100<br />
Million up to INR<br />
500 Million.<br />
Over INR 500<br />
Million up to INR<br />
1000 Million<br />
a) Full powers for<br />
feasibility, detailed<br />
engineering and<br />
supervision of<br />
works (PMC).<br />
b) Full powers for<br />
hiring consultancy<br />
services pertaining<br />
to execution of<br />
works other than<br />
specified at a)<br />
above up to INR<br />
25000/- each case<br />
subject to a ceiling<br />
of INR 500,000 /<br />
annum<br />
Full powers.<br />
Full power in<br />
consultation with<br />
Finance<br />
Senior<br />
Administrative<br />
Grade (Chief<br />
Engineers etc.)<br />
(SAG)<br />
Up to INR 30<br />
Million<br />
Up to INR 30<br />
Million<br />
Up to INR 10<br />
Million<br />
Up to INR 100<br />
Million<br />
Over INR 100<br />
Million up to INR<br />
500 Million<br />
-<br />
Selection Grade/<br />
Junior<br />
Administrative<br />
Grade (SG/ JA)<br />
REMARKS<br />
The tenders will be opened in the<br />
presence of one officer from the<br />
Executive department and one<br />
Accounts representative and an<br />
opening register will be maintained<br />
for noting the salient details of the<br />
offers as per the guidelines. The<br />
comparative statement of offers, a<br />
detailed briefing note containing<br />
technical conformity statement as<br />
per the laid down parameters and<br />
specifications will be prepared by<br />
the Executive of the department<br />
concerned of the rank not lower<br />
than Sr.Scale.<br />
- Finance Concurrence required<br />
- Finance Concurrence required<br />
- For tenders of value more than INR<br />
1000 Million, evaluation<br />
committee shall consists of three<br />
Directors including Director<br />
(Finance) for acceptance of<br />
<strong>Railway</strong> Board with MD’s<br />
recommendation<br />
Up to INR 100<br />
Million<br />
Finance vetting required.<br />
For foreign companies, Legal<br />
vetting also required<br />
Nil Nil Prior finance concurrence will be<br />
required if the consultancy is not an<br />
approved item in the consolidated<br />
MUTP estimate costing more than<br />
Rs.25000/-<br />
To consist of three<br />
SAG officers<br />
consisting of one<br />
Finance Member. In<br />
case of nonavailability,<br />
next<br />
lower category<br />
Finance officer (full<br />
powers).<br />
Full powers of<br />
acceptance for<br />
tenders dealt by the<br />
JA/SG Committee.<br />
Full powers for<br />
tenders within<br />
acceptance limits, in<br />
consultation with<br />
Finance.<br />
To consist of three<br />
JA/SG Officers,<br />
(Finance Member<br />
can be of next<br />
lower grade) of<br />
tenders up to INR<br />
1Million<br />
Variation in consultancy contracts<br />
approved by <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>, if any,<br />
will require prior approval of<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> with Finance<br />
comments.<br />
78
NATURE OF<br />
POWERS<br />
Extension of<br />
Contract<br />
Managing<br />
Director<br />
Director<br />
Full powers for<br />
contract within<br />
their power of<br />
acceptance<br />
Senior<br />
Administrative<br />
Grade (Chief<br />
Engineers etc.)<br />
(SAG)<br />
Full powers for<br />
contracts within their<br />
power of acceptance<br />
Selection Grade/<br />
Junior<br />
Administrative<br />
Grade (SG/ JA)<br />
NIL<br />
REMARKS<br />
Subject to<br />
a) no loss to the administration<br />
b) Contract is not awarded on the<br />
grounds of earlier completion<br />
period.<br />
Variations in Contract<br />
Contract<br />
Conditions<br />
Quantities beyond<br />
permitted<br />
percentage in the<br />
contract.<br />
Full powers for<br />
contracts with in<br />
their power of<br />
acceptance.<br />
Up to 50 percent<br />
of initial contract<br />
value provided<br />
enhanced value of<br />
contract is within<br />
his power of<br />
acceptance<br />
Full powers for<br />
contracts with in<br />
their power of<br />
acceptance.<br />
Up to 25 percent of<br />
initial contract value<br />
provided enhanced<br />
value of contract is<br />
within his power of<br />
acceptance<br />
NIL<br />
NIL<br />
Any change having financial<br />
implication shall require<br />
concurrence of finance<br />
Prior finance concurrence shall be<br />
required for overall variation in<br />
excess of 25 percent of original<br />
contract value and for overall<br />
variation of individual item in<br />
excess of 25 percent of schedule<br />
quantity. For foundation items,<br />
however, the variation limit of 25<br />
percent will not apply and prior<br />
finance concurrences will not be<br />
required.<br />
For processing variation in excess<br />
of 25 percent Engineering Code<br />
provisions shall be adopted to<br />
explore possible cost reduction<br />
Introduction of<br />
additional items in<br />
contract.<br />
Full power<br />
provided the<br />
revised cost of the<br />
work is within the<br />
power of original<br />
sanctioning<br />
authority”.<br />
Full power provided<br />
the revised cost of<br />
the work is within<br />
the power of original<br />
sanctioning<br />
authority”.<br />
NIL<br />
All such cases require concurrence<br />
of finance<br />
238. An assessment of the capacity of the Implementing Agency to implement<br />
procurement actions for the project has been carried out based on the information provided in<br />
response to the Questionnaire, by MRVC and considering the experience of the bank team<br />
during implementation of the MUTP-1. The assessment reviewed the organizational structure<br />
for implementing the project and the interaction between the project’s staff responsible for<br />
procurement at MRVC.<br />
239. The Table 2 below, sums up the Procurement Capacity Risk and Mitigation Action<br />
Plan agreed with MRVC:<br />
Table 2. Procurement Risk Mitigation Action Plan<br />
Action Due Status/ Completed<br />
Agree on appropriate dispute December<br />
resolution provisions for 31, 2009<br />
contracts (at least for <strong>Bank</strong><br />
financed ones, note that it is<br />
mandatory for ICB).<br />
Agree on list of unacceptable<br />
NCB issues and on removal<br />
from documents to be used for<br />
<strong>Bank</strong> financed procurement.<br />
December<br />
31, 2009<br />
<strong>Bank</strong>'s SBDs/ Model documents for ICB<br />
and NCB will be used, which provides for<br />
these requirements adequately. Action<br />
completed.<br />
Same as above. Conditions agreed to<br />
already.<br />
Pending Action/ due<br />
on<br />
Nil<br />
Nil<br />
79
Arrange for training on<br />
procurement planning and use<br />
of new SBDs of the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />
September<br />
30, 2010<br />
This is being implemented and details of<br />
the staff that has undergone such training<br />
shall be provided to the <strong>Bank</strong>. Also a<br />
detailed list of training scheduled for the<br />
next year will be prepared and provided<br />
for information of the <strong>Bank</strong><br />
Will be continuous<br />
exercise during the<br />
implementation<br />
phase<br />
Improvement / Modernization<br />
of Records Management<br />
Systems<br />
Capacity Building in<br />
Contracts Management<br />
December<br />
31, 2010<br />
December<br />
31, 2010<br />
Project will carry out internal/<br />
independent assessment to improve/<br />
modernize records management systems<br />
Project will draw out a plan of training<br />
activities for staff to enhance their skills<br />
in the area of Contracts Management<br />
During project<br />
implementation<br />
During project<br />
implementation<br />
240. The overall project risk for procurement is ‘Moderate’.<br />
C. Methods of Procurement<br />
Goods and Works<br />
241. Goods/ Information Systems, estimated to cost US$500,000 or more per contract;<br />
and Works/ Turnkey Contracts/ Supply and Installation Contracts, estimated to cost<br />
US$10,000,000 or more per contract will be procured following ICB procedures as per Section II<br />
of the Procurement Guidelines. Goods/ Information Systems, estimated to cost US$30,000 or<br />
more but less than US$500,000 per contract and Works/ Turnkey Contracts/ Supply and<br />
Installation Contracts, estimated to cost US$30,000 or more but less than US$10,000,000 per<br />
contract may be procured following NCB procedures, meeting the requirement of Paragraphs 3.3<br />
and 3.4 of the Procurement Guidelines.<br />
242. Goods and Works estimated to cost less than US$30,000 per contract may be<br />
procured following Shopping procedures which meet the requirement of Paragraph 3.5 of the<br />
Procurement Guidelines.<br />
243. Goods and Works which meet the requirement of Paragraph 3.6 of Procurement.<br />
244. Guidelines may be procured following Direct Contracting Procedures.<br />
Hiring of Consultants<br />
245. Shortlists of consultants for services estimated to cost less than US$ 500,000<br />
equivalent per contract may be composed entirely of national consultants in accordance with the<br />
provisions of Paragraph 2.7 of the Consultant Guidelines.<br />
246. The following methods of selection will be adopted depending upon size and<br />
complexity of assignment, as defined in the Consultancy Guidelines:<br />
Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS)<br />
Quality Based Selection (QBS)<br />
Selection under Fixed Budget (FBS)<br />
Least Cost Selection (LCS)<br />
Selection based on Consultant’s Qualifications (CQS)<br />
Single Source Selection (SSS)<br />
80
Individuals<br />
247. The services of individual consultants will be procured as per the provisions<br />
stipulated in paragraphs 5.1 to 5.4 of the <strong>Bank</strong>’s Guidelines.<br />
D. Review Requirements<br />
248. Contracts for Works/ Turnkey Contracts/ Supply and Installation Contracts,<br />
estimated to cost over US$10 million; and those for Goods/ Information Systems, estimated to<br />
cost over US$1,000,000 equivalent per contract, shall be subject to prior review by the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />
249. Thresholds for prior review by the <strong>Bank</strong> will be reviewed during the<br />
implementation of project, based on reviews by the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />
250. All contracts awarded on Direct Contracting basis, will be subject to prior review<br />
by the <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />
251. The prior review threshold for Consultancy Contracts with firms is proposed at<br />
US$200,000 equivalent, whereas the same for individual consultants is proposed as US$50,000<br />
equivalent. Further, sole source contracts to firms estimated to cost US$100,000 or more and to<br />
individuals estimated to cost US$20,000 or more will be subject to prior review.<br />
252. All contracts not covered under prior review arrangements specified above, will be<br />
subject to post award review/ review during supervision missions/ review by consultants to be<br />
appointed by the by <strong>Bank</strong><br />
E. Procurement Plan<br />
253. The Borrower, at appraisal, developed a procurement plan for project<br />
implementation which provides the basis for the procurement methods. This plan, included in the<br />
Implementation Manual, has been agreed between the Borrower and the Project Team on April<br />
30, 2010 and is available at <strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> <strong>Ltd</strong>, 2nd Floor, Churchgate<br />
Station Building, <strong>Mumbai</strong> – 400 020, India. It will also be available in the project’s database and<br />
in the <strong>Bank</strong>’s external website. The Procurement Plan will be updated in agreement with the<br />
Project Team annually or as required to reflect the actual project implementation needs and<br />
improvements in institutional capacity.<br />
F. Frequency of Procurement Supervision<br />
254. In addition to the prior review supervision to be carried out from <strong>Bank</strong> offices, the<br />
capacity assessment of the Implementing Agency has recommended that the procurement<br />
arrangement and implementation progress should be reviewed during six monthly supervision<br />
missions, which shall also include need based visits to the field and to carry out post review of<br />
procurement actions.<br />
255. Procurement information will be collected and recorded as follows:<br />
(a) Prompt reporting of contract award information for the respective components;<br />
(b) Comprehensive quarterly reports indicating,<br />
(i) Revised cost estimates for individual contracts and total cost;<br />
81
(ii) Revised timings of procurement actions including advertising, bidding, contract award<br />
and completion time for individual contracts; and<br />
(iii)Compliance report by the borrower within three months of the loan signing date<br />
G. Details of the Procurement Arrangements Involving International Competition<br />
256. Goods, Works, and Non Consulting Services<br />
(a) List of contract packages to be procured following ICB and direct contracting:<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />
Ref. No.<br />
GOODS<br />
MUTP2A-G1<br />
Contract<br />
(Description)<br />
Procurement of<br />
electrics for 3-<br />
phase EMUs<br />
Procurement of<br />
OHE<br />
MUTP2A-G2<br />
maintenance<br />
car<br />
SUPPLY AND INSTALLATION<br />
Procurement of<br />
digital axle<br />
MUTP2A-W1<br />
counter and<br />
quad cable<br />
Setting up of<br />
traction<br />
substations at<br />
MUTP2A-W2 Chinchpokli<br />
and Sion and<br />
six switching<br />
posts<br />
Supply and<br />
installation of<br />
110 kV cables<br />
MUTP2A-W3 for Chinchpokli<br />
and Sion<br />
traction<br />
substations<br />
MUTP2A- Power Supply<br />
TA8<br />
MUTP2A-<br />
TA9<br />
Simulation<br />
Rail Operations<br />
Simulation<br />
Estimated<br />
Cost<br />
($ Million)<br />
Proc.<br />
Method<br />
P-Q<br />
Domestic<br />
Preference<br />
(yes/no)<br />
Review<br />
by <strong>Bank</strong><br />
(Prior /<br />
Post)<br />
Expected<br />
Bid-<br />
Opening<br />
Date<br />
355.7 ICB No No Prior Sep 2010<br />
17.3 ICB No No Prior 31.10.10<br />
15.7 ICB No No Prior 30.06.10<br />
15.7 ICB No No Prior 31.05.10<br />
6.5 ICB No No Prior 11.08.09<br />
0.9 ICB No No Prior 30.11.10<br />
0.6 ICB No No Prior 30.09.10<br />
Comments<br />
Bidding<br />
<strong>Document</strong>s<br />
reviewed by<br />
the <strong>Bank</strong><br />
Contract<br />
awarded<br />
257. Slice and Package: If a transaction comprises several packages, lots and slices,<br />
the aggregate estimated value of all contract(s) resulting out of the bidding process will<br />
determine the applicable threshold for deciding about the review requirements. Further, Scope of<br />
Work or Requirements for procurement of Goods shall not be broken down into several packages<br />
to reduce the review requirements or to resort to a less competitive method of procurement.<br />
82
258. Consulting Services<br />
a) List of consulting assignments with short-list of international firms.<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />
Ref. No.<br />
MUTP2A-TA1<br />
MUTP2A- TA2<br />
MUTP2A- TA3<br />
MUTP2A- TA4<br />
MUTP2A- TA5<br />
MUTP2A- TA6<br />
MUTP2A- TA7<br />
Description of<br />
Assignment<br />
Development Program for<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban Rail<br />
Services<br />
Provision to support the<br />
development of the Indian<br />
<strong>Railway</strong>s long term<br />
strategy for Suburban Rail<br />
Revenue maximizing study<br />
in particular for non-fare<br />
box revenue and<br />
affordability for<br />
commuters<br />
More efficient and user<br />
friendly ticket issuing<br />
Passenger information and<br />
security<br />
Reduction of trespassing<br />
and improvement of safety<br />
on the track<br />
Improved Environmental<br />
Management of Rail<br />
Operations<br />
Estimated<br />
Cost ($<br />
million)<br />
Selection<br />
Method<br />
Review<br />
by <strong>Bank</strong><br />
(Prior /<br />
Post)<br />
Expected<br />
Proposals<br />
Submission<br />
Date<br />
5.40 QCBS Prior 31.08.2010<br />
1.60 QCBS Prior 31.01.2011<br />
1.10 QCBS Prior 01.10.2010<br />
0.50 QCBS Prior 31.07.2010<br />
0.50 QCBS Prior 31.07.2010<br />
0.10 CPF 30.06.2010<br />
0.50 QCBS Prior 31.08.2010<br />
MUTP2A- TA10 Training 3.20 QCBS Prior 31.07.2010<br />
Comments<br />
H. Anti- Corruption Measures<br />
259. The project has prepared a GAAP which is presented in Annex 6A. The key issues<br />
and risks concerning implementation of the project have been identified, including those<br />
relating to Procurement, listed in the Table 1 - Governance and Accountability Action Plan.<br />
260. GAAP also identifies the risks associated with procurement processes, namely<br />
weak disclosure of project information leading to low stakeholder participation and<br />
accountability, weak complaint and grievance redress mechanisms, risk of collusion, fraud and<br />
corruption in procurement, and weak institutional capacity for project implementation. Actions<br />
pertaining to mitigating these risks include (a) suo motu disclosure of information, development<br />
of better systems for record and document management; (b) establish procedures to deal with<br />
external complaints on procurement, fraud/corruption and construction quality; (c) tracking of<br />
the status of complaints, related investigations and measures; (d) a transparent policy describing<br />
incentives for whistleblowers, sanctions for staff found indulging in fraudulent behavior; (e)<br />
strengthening of internal audit, project monitoring and contract management arrangements; (g)<br />
building a database with procurement and contractor performance data from the project such as<br />
number of bids received, bid prices, unit prices, specifications, time and cost overruns and (h) a<br />
comprehensive training needs assessment for its entire staff, and finalize a training plan.<br />
83
Introduction<br />
Annex 9: Economic and Financial Analysis<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
261. This annex presents the results of the economic evaluation of the procurement of<br />
an additional 72 12-car rakes for the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban system. This is expected to yield a net<br />
present value over 35 years of operation of over US$262 million (2008 prices discounted at 12<br />
percent to 2010) and to achieve an economic rate of return of 17 percent. It also summarizes the<br />
projected financial performance of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban system and relates it to the overall<br />
financial performance of Indian <strong>Railway</strong>s.<br />
Background and Project Description<br />
262. Passenger traffic on the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban system has been growing steadily for<br />
over two decades, during which time the network and fleet has been progressively expanded and<br />
improved. MUTP-1, signed in 2002, included a component for the supply of additional rakes and<br />
is now nearing completion. During this time, the conversion of the suburban network from DC to<br />
AC traction has also been taking place to enable the more intensive service to be operated.<br />
However, the trains remain probably the most crowded in the world and the current project aims<br />
to provide a further 72 12-car rakes to provide additional capacity as well as completing the first<br />
phase of conversion from DC to AC and providing maintenance facilities for the additional rakes<br />
and stabling lines.<br />
Traffic Forecast<br />
263. The model used to derive the traffic forecasts and the associated system operating<br />
costs was originally developed as part of the Financial and Institutional Study of the <strong>Mumbai</strong><br />
Suburban System in 1996. It has been used for over a decade by MRVC and has been<br />
continuously validated by comparing its forecasts, assuming the changes in these four variables<br />
that actually occurred, with what has occurred in practice. This comparison has showed a close<br />
correspondence and the model is considered a robust tool suitable for forecasting demand in this<br />
project. It has three main sets of inputs:<br />
(a) financial and economic parameters;<br />
(b) base operating statistics;<br />
(c) parameters for forecasting traffic demand, earnings and operating expenses.<br />
264. Passenger demand was projected taking into account:<br />
(a) assumed annual population growth in the part of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region<br />
served by the suburban railway of 1.8 percent<br />
(b) changes in the key service parameters of service frequency, new routes, fares and<br />
crowding, using the elasticities given in Table 1. These are the same as used in the<br />
original MUTP-1 forecasts except for the elasticity with respect to network size (as<br />
measured by route-km). This was reduced from 0.2 to 0.1 as the new routes now<br />
proposed would pass through sparsely populated areas. The original MUTP-1 forecasts<br />
are based on a 1996 consultant study which undertook time-series analysis of demand to<br />
establish fare elasticities and stated preference studies to estimate the impact of<br />
crowding on demand through a willingness to pay approach, complemented by a<br />
willingness to pay estimate of in-vehicle time.<br />
84
Table 1. Assumed Demand Elasticities<br />
Parameter<br />
Elasticity<br />
Fare - 0.3<br />
Route Kms + 0.1<br />
Service + 0.1<br />
Crowding - 0.2<br />
(c) Increase in the per capita trip rate of 0.2 percent per annum, based on the recently<br />
concluded Comprehensive Transport Study.<br />
(d) Increase in average trip length of 0.5 percent per annum. Although the historical data<br />
shows a much higher growth, the shifting of business districts towards the north of<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> and the improved transport infrastructure for east-west connectivity is likely to<br />
reduce the average trip length on the suburban system.<br />
(e) Fares are assumed to increase at the same rate as inflation in the long run, i.e. fares will<br />
be constant in real terms. The fare surcharge is assumed to continue till the loan for<br />
MUTP-1 is paid back and no additional surcharge was considered. A sensitivity test also<br />
considered the case in which fares remain constant in nominal terms; as inflation is<br />
forecast at eight percent p.a. this is equivalent to a reduction in real fares of 7.4 percent<br />
p.a.<br />
(f) Service plans (train frequency and size) were derived from the current suburban railway<br />
timetable and the future timetables developed during project planning.<br />
265. The key assumptions used to calculate operating costs are:<br />
(a) base costs taken from the annual cost analysis of suburban services<br />
(b) no change in the real cost of energy but reductions in energy consumption of dual<br />
voltage rakes of ten percent because of reduced starting resistance and ten percent from<br />
regeneration;<br />
(c) a reduction in maintenance cost of new rakes of 15 percent;<br />
(d) savings in energy consumption in sections converted from DC to AC of five percent<br />
from reductions in transmission losses and five percent because of improved reception of<br />
regenerated energy;<br />
(e) reduction of 60 percent in the maintenance cost of power supply installations in the<br />
converted sections;<br />
(f) reduction in transmission losses of about five percent on the energy consumed by main<br />
line trains on DC to AC converted suburban sections.<br />
266. The reduction in operating costs as a result of AC conversion have all been<br />
estimated by MRVC based on experience gained during the first phase of the AC-DC<br />
conversion. The base operating and demand statistics were taken from the published statistics for<br />
2006/7. These give, for each of Central and Western <strong>Railway</strong>s, passengers, passenger-km,<br />
vehicle-km, train-km and gross tonne-km.<br />
Economic Analysis Framework<br />
267. The economic analysis compares the incremental costs and benefits of the project<br />
compared to delaying the purchase of additional rakes until 2022.<br />
85
268. Project Costs: These cover the capital cost of the incremental rakes, the<br />
conversion from DC to AC of the remaining network and additional maintenance facilities<br />
(Table 2).<br />
Table 2. Incremental Capital Costs<br />
(Rs crores) US$ (million)<br />
2009-10 130 27<br />
2010-11 316 66<br />
2011-12 623 130<br />
2012-13 1127 235<br />
2013-14 1359 283<br />
2014-15 735 153<br />
Total 4290 894<br />
Converted at US$1 = Rs 48<br />
269. The project costs also include the operating cost of the additional services that are<br />
run in the Project Case, net of the reduction in unit operating cost caused by the more economical<br />
AC units.<br />
270. Terminal values of the assets have been based on the remaining lives of the assets<br />
in the final year of the analysis. The financial costs have been converted into economic costs<br />
using a conversion factor of 0.9.<br />
271. Benefits: These include the following:<br />
(a) The reduction in crowding will reduce travel discomfort for passengers. This was valued<br />
at Rs.3.5 per hour (2001 prices) in the economic analysis of MUTP-1, based on stated<br />
preference surveys undertaken as part of project preparation. This has been updated to<br />
Rs.5.0 per hour at 2008 prices.<br />
(b) Savings in time due to (i) reduced journey time, and (ii) reduced waiting time due to<br />
increase in the frequency of trains once rakes are put into service. Journey time savings<br />
accounted for 32 percent of economic savings (compared to 24 percent in MUTP-1). The<br />
current evaluation does not include benefits from waiting time savings, as these would<br />
be relatively small at peak periods (if they were included at the conventional value of<br />
twice in-vehicle time, they would increase total net benefits by over 40 percent). Thus,<br />
the benefit accruing due to reduction in waiting time has not been taken into account<br />
while calculating the ERR. The value of time was derived in the CTS study as Rs.25.00<br />
per hour (2006 prices). This has been updated to Rs.27.50 per hour for the base year<br />
(2008) and increased by five percent annually to reflect increases in per capita income.<br />
The CTS estimates were derived by transportation mode, based on household<br />
characteristics (including trip frequency and household income) recorded in the<br />
household survey.<br />
(c) The improved level of service is forecast to generate additional demand in the Project<br />
Case compared to the Base Case. The benefits for these passengers have been estimated<br />
using the ‘rule of half’.<br />
(d) Some of these passengers will be diverted from other modes. Diversion from car has<br />
been neglected but 20 percent of the additional patronage has been assumed to come<br />
from bus. This reduction in bus patronage will enable service levels to be adjusted<br />
(assuming an average bus occupancy of 54 passengers/bus), leading to a reduction in bus<br />
86
operating costs. These were estimated in the BEST business plan at Rs.45.60 per km<br />
(2008 prices).<br />
(e) The reduction in bus operations will also contribute to reduced pollution and road<br />
congestion. While the <strong>Mumbai</strong> EMU services generate very limited pollutants locally,<br />
buses emit NO2 and SO2 at an estimated rate of 0.25 kg per bus hour. The direct benefit<br />
was estimated at Rs.175 per passenger per annum (2001 prices) in the MUTP-1 analysis;<br />
this has been updated to Rs.240 in 2008 prices. Indirect benefits from reduced pollution<br />
arise to the population living along the road corridor and are estimated at Rs.5.5 per ton<br />
per person (2008 prices). Road congestion benefits, estimated at Rs 0.05 per passengerkm,<br />
averaged over the day are negligible. Indeed, while based on <strong>Mumbai</strong> data, they are<br />
conservative compared to results obtained in Paris for instance. 62<br />
Result of Economic Analysis and Sensitivity Analysis:<br />
272. The benefits are calculated for the 35-year period following project completion,<br />
from 2010 to 2045 and the estimated EIRR derived and NPV calculated (using a discount rate of<br />
12 percent). The estimated NPV, discounted to 2010, is about US$262 million in 2008 prices<br />
with an EIRR of 17 percent. The distribution of benefits is shown in Table 3 and the forecast<br />
cash flows in Table 4.<br />
Table 3. Project Benefits (US$ million 2008, discounted at 12 percent to 2010)<br />
Total<br />
Capital expenditure -501<br />
Additional operating cost -1122<br />
Subtotal -1623<br />
User benefits<br />
Benefits to existing passengers<br />
Reduced crowding 952<br />
Reduced journey time 613<br />
Benefits to diverted passengers 80<br />
Subtotal. 1645<br />
Bus-related<br />
Reduced operating costs 178<br />
Pollution benefits 77<br />
Subtotal 255<br />
NPV 262<br />
62 Prud’homme, R. et al, Public Transport Congestion Costs: the Case of Paris Subway, Draft, 2010<br />
87
Table 4. MUTP-2A Forecast Economic Cash Flows<br />
(In crores of Rupees - Nominal)<br />
Year<br />
Capital<br />
Investment<br />
in MUTP-2A<br />
Incremental<br />
Operating<br />
Cost<br />
Comfort<br />
Journey<br />
time<br />
Bus<br />
VOC<br />
Direct<br />
pollution<br />
Indirect<br />
pollution<br />
Diverted<br />
passengers<br />
Economic<br />
Savings<br />
Replacement<br />
Cost of<br />
Assets<br />
Terminal<br />
Value of<br />
Assets<br />
2009-10 -117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -117<br />
2010-11 -284 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -284<br />
2011-12 -561 -38 47 77 4 0 2 0 131 -468<br />
2012-13 -1014 -296 253 160 40 1 16 7 477 -834<br />
2013-14 -1223 -704 459 260 121 3 49 37 929 -998<br />
2014-15 -662 -767 476 368 173 4 70 59 1151 -278<br />
2015-16 -823 533 393 164 4 66 61 1221 398<br />
2016-17 -889 583 423 171 4 69 67 1318 429<br />
2017-18 -938 740 470 116 3 47 52 1428 490<br />
2018-19 -1017 784 503 135 3 54 64 1543 526<br />
2019-20 -1096 861 538 138 3 55 69 1664 568<br />
2020-21 -1183 939 576 144 4 58 77 1798 615<br />
2021-22 -1183 967 594 148 4 60 79 1852 669<br />
2022-23 -1183 996 611 153 4 61 82 1908 724<br />
2023-24 -1183 1026 630 157 4 63 84 1965 782<br />
2024-25 -1183 1057 649 162 4 65 87 2024 840<br />
2025-26 -1183 1089 668 167 4 67 89 2084 901<br />
2026-27 -1183 1121 688 172 4 69 92 2147 964<br />
2027-28 -1183 1155 709 177 4 71 95 2211 1028<br />
2028-29 -1183 1190 730 182 5 73 98 2278 1094<br />
2029-30 -1183 1225 752 188 5 75 101 2346 1163<br />
2030-31 -1183 1262 775 193 5 78 104 2416 1233<br />
2031-32 -1183 1300 798 199 5 80 107 2489 1306<br />
2032-33 -1183 1339 822 205 5 82 110 2564 1380<br />
2033-34 -1183 1379 846 211 5 85 113 2640 1457<br />
2034-35 -1183 1421 872 218 5 87 117 2720 -90 1446<br />
2035-36 -1183 1463 898 224 6 90 120 2801 -180 1438<br />
2036-37 -1183 1507 925 231 6 93 124 2885 -414 1288<br />
2037-38 -1183 1552 953 238 6 96 128 2972 -864 925<br />
2038-39 -1183 1599 981 245 6 98 131 3061 -1127 751<br />
2039-40 -1183 1647 1011 252 6 101 135 3153 -657 1313<br />
2040-41 -1183 1696 1041 260 7 104 139 3247 2064<br />
2041-42 -1183 1747 1072 268 7 108 144 3345 2162<br />
2042-43 -1183 1799 1104 276 7 111 148 3445 2262<br />
2043-44 -1183 1853 1138 284 7 114 152 3549 2365<br />
2044-45 -1183 1909 1172 292 7 118 157 3655 2799 5271<br />
Net<br />
Benefits<br />
NPV -501 -1122 952 613 178 5 72 80 1899 -425 521 262<br />
ERR 17%<br />
88
273. The sensitivity of these results was tested against changes in seven base<br />
case assumptions:<br />
(a) an increase in investment costs of 20 percent;<br />
(b) including user benefits only<br />
(c) reducing the benefits by ten percent<br />
(d) evaluation period of 15 years<br />
(e) income growth of two percent p.a. instead of three percent p.a.<br />
(f) fares held constant in nominal terms i.e. a reduction in real terms of 7.4<br />
percent p.a.<br />
(g) delays of one, two or three years in the delivery of the trains.<br />
274. Switching values (that is the values which will cause the IERR to be<br />
below the discount rate) for the following variables were also included in the<br />
sensitivity analysis: construction costs, benefit reduction factor, income growth per<br />
year, incremental operating cost, journey time benefits, comfort benefits. They are<br />
presented in Table 5.<br />
Table 5. Switching Values for Key Project Variables<br />
Variable<br />
Switching value<br />
Construction costs<br />
152% of base case<br />
Benefit reduction factor -14% compared to base case<br />
Income growth per year 3.50% (base case is 5%)<br />
Incremental Operating Cost 123% of base case<br />
Comfort benefits<br />
73% of base case<br />
Journey time benefits<br />
57% of base case<br />
275. The results of the sensitivity analysis, given in Table 6, show the project<br />
is robust.<br />
Table 6. Sensitivity of Project Evaluation<br />
Test IRR (%) $ (million)<br />
1 Base 17 262<br />
2 Construction costs +20% 14 162<br />
3 User benefits only 12 7<br />
4 Benefits reduced by 10% 13 72<br />
5 Evaluation period of 20 years 14 62<br />
6 Income growth of 2% p.a. 8 -220<br />
7 Fares constant in nominal terms 25 864<br />
8 1 year delay in EMU procurement 17 259<br />
9 2 years delay in EMU procurement 17 253<br />
10 3 years delay in EMU procurement 17 245<br />
276. Table 6 indicates that benefits approximately triple if fares are held<br />
constant in nominal terms. This is caused by the increased patronage, in both the with<br />
and without-project cases (Table 7), and the resulting increase in benefits due to<br />
frequency and journey time savings as well as the significantly increased comfort<br />
benefits because of the greater relief provided by the project.<br />
89
Table 7. Forecast Number Of Passengers Originating<br />
With and Without Project (million)<br />
2008/9 2011/12 2015/16 2020/21<br />
Fares constant in real terms<br />
Without project 2,648 2,817 2,980 3,324<br />
With project 2,648 2,825 3,282 3,583<br />
Fares constant in nominal terms<br />
Without project 2,648 2,928 3,323 4,136<br />
With project 2,648 2,937 3,659 4,384<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban System Financial Performance and Impact on IR Finances<br />
277. Although the <strong>Mumbai</strong> system is one of the world’s major suburban<br />
railways, it is nevertheless a relatively small component of IR’s overall operations. In<br />
2008/9, the <strong>Mumbai</strong> system represented an estimated 12 percent of IR’s passenger<br />
traffic (measured in passenger-km) and about seven percent of IR’s total traffic task 63 .<br />
However, because of the very high average loads carried and the low average fare, it<br />
only generated about 1.5 percent of IR’s total revenue and about two percent of its<br />
total working expense (excluding depreciation). Because MUTP-2A will reduce<br />
overcrowding and thus require more assets and services to carry the same volume of<br />
traffic, its financial performance is expected to deteriorate for at least the mediumterm.<br />
However, its comparatively small share of the total IR business means that its<br />
financial performance has only a minor impact on the overall financial performance of<br />
IR as a whole, which is far more dependent on railway-wide tariff policies and<br />
continued strong growth in freight traffic.<br />
Projected Financial Performance of <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban System<br />
278. Using the operating and financial model described in the traffic forecast<br />
section, MRVC have undertaken financial projections of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban<br />
system over a 25-year period from 2008-09, which takes into account the impact of<br />
both the ongoing MUTP-1 (assumed to be completed in 2010-11) as well as MUTP-<br />
2A (assumed to be completed in 2014-15). A Base Case analysis has been undertaken<br />
as well as sensitivity analyses for the key assumptions.<br />
279. Depreciation charges were derived directly as the annual cost of<br />
replacing the fleet. An estimate of depreciation has been made using the results of a<br />
detailed analysis undertaken by consultants in 1996 which examined all renewable<br />
assets used by the suburban services (equivalent to about 15 percent of total cost). 64<br />
280. Table 8 and Figure 1 show that the deficit, excluding dividend<br />
payments to GOI and any depreciation related to infrastructure, will increase to<br />
around Rs 200 crore (Rs 2008), if fares increase in line with inflation or to around Rs<br />
1100 crore if fares remain at their current levels.<br />
63 As measured by traffic units, the sum of passenger-km and net tonne-km.<br />
64 This bears little or no relation to the ‘depreciation’ included in the IR accounts, which is primarily<br />
determined by the surplus available each year for reinvestment in assets and has been excluded from<br />
these projections. The depreciation allowance calculated by IR is not a true measure of depreciation but<br />
rather an allocation of the annual appropriation of surplus cash to a Depreciation Renewal Fund; it has<br />
no direct relation to asset values or lives.<br />
90
Figure 1. Financial Projections of <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban Services (Rs crores 2008)<br />
2,500<br />
2,000<br />
1,500<br />
1,000<br />
500<br />
0<br />
Deficit (Constant nominal fares)<br />
Revenue (Constant real fares)<br />
Cost (excl dividend and infra depreciation)<br />
Deficit (Constant real fares)<br />
Revenue (Constant nominal fares fares)<br />
281. As highlighted in Table 8, the increase in the deficit is directly linked to<br />
the reduction in crowding. The average passengers per coach is expected to reduce by<br />
around 35 percent, from about 234 to about 155, as the additional fleet is introduced<br />
before beginning to increase again as demand increases. This increase in the fleet can<br />
be seen in the financial projections, with working expenses increasing from Rs 1,300<br />
crore to about Rs 1,900 crore as the additional vehicles are introduced.<br />
282. The estimated working ratios and operating ratios 65 to 2020/21 are<br />
given in Table 9 below. They assume fares rise in line with inflation and are given<br />
including and excluding the suburban fare surcharge. Without the project, the working<br />
ratios are below 100 percent and the Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s would be able to carry on in the<br />
short-term without financial support from third parties. If MUTP-2A is undertaken the<br />
Zonal <strong>Railway</strong>s would be less able in the short term to generate profit if revenues<br />
decrease (the working ratio is consistently over 100 percent). In addition, if MUTP-<br />
2A is carried out, the suburban railway would be less able to recover operating costs<br />
on the long term without financial support and would not cover its long run variable<br />
costs because of low tariffs (the operating ratio is higher with MUTP-2A than<br />
without).<br />
65 The working ratio is the ratio of a company's total annual expenses (excluding depreciation and debtrelated<br />
expenses) to the annual gross income. The operating ratio is the ratio of the company's<br />
operating expenses (also excluding debt service charges) to operating revenues.<br />
91
283. In spite of this, the results for the <strong>Mumbai</strong> system even with MUTP-2A<br />
remain reasonable compared to suburban systems elsewhere in the world and<br />
significantly better than the results for the two other major IR suburban systems in<br />
Chennai and Kolkata.<br />
92
Table 8. <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban Services – Financial Projections Assuming MUTP-2A (Rs crores 2008/9)<br />
Assumptions<br />
1 Fares Fare rise in line with inflation from 09/10<br />
2 Fare surcharge For Phase I - As decided between IR,GOM and MOF<br />
For Phase II - Phase I Surcharge continues<br />
SUBURBAN OPERATING FORECAST STATEMENT (Rs crores Mar 08):<br />
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21<br />
Revenue - Constant real fares<br />
1 Fare Revenue 1,165 1,127 1,093 1,114 1,147 1,184 1,216 1,313 1,381 1,403 1,437 1,469 1,502 1,536 1,570<br />
2 Other 44 51 55 59 64 69 75 81 87 94 102 110 119 128 139<br />
3 Total 1,209 1,178 1,148 1,173 1,212 1,253 1,291 1,394 1,468 1,497 1,539 1,579 1,621 1,664 1,709<br />
Revenue - Constant nominal fares<br />
1 Fare Revenue 1,165 1,127 1,093 1,114 1,086 1,055 1,019 1,039 1,029 986 952 918 886 854 824<br />
2 Other 44 51 55 59 64 69 75 81 87 94 102 110 119 128 139<br />
3 Total 1,209 1,178 1,148 1,173 1,150 1,124 1,094 1,120 1,117 1,080 1,054 1,028 1,005 983 963<br />
Expenditure (Excl. Depreciation) – Constant real fares<br />
1 Staff 722 749 808 820 824 834 946 1,104 1,104 1,100 1,098 1,096 1,093 1,091 1,089<br />
2 Materials 148 154 166 169 169 171 194 227 227 226 226 225 225 224 224<br />
3 Traction Energy 230 247 254 230 219 218 251 304 307 307 309 310 311 312 314<br />
4 Other 182 189 204 207 208 210 238 278 278 277 277 276 276 275 274<br />
5 Working Expenses 1,282 1,339 1,432 1,425 1,420 1,433 1,629 1,914 1,916 1,911 1,909 1,907 1,905 1,903 1,901<br />
Expenditure (Excl. Depreciation) – Constant nominal fares<br />
1 Staff 722 749 808 820 828 840 956 1,119 1,123 1,123 1,126 1,128 1,131 1,134 1,138<br />
2 Materials 148 154 166 169 170 173 196 230 231 231 231 232 232 233 234<br />
3 Traction Energy 230 247 254 230 220 220 254 308 311 313 316 318 321 324 327<br />
4 Other 182 189 204 207 209 212 241 282 283 283 284 284 285 286 287<br />
5 Working Expenses 1,282 1,339 1,432 1,425 1,427 1,445 1,647 1,939 1,949 1,951 1,957 1,963 1,969 1,977 1,985<br />
Deficit<br />
1 Constant real fares -73 -161 -284 -252 -209 -180 -339 -519 -448 -414 -370 -328 -284 -239 -193<br />
2 Constant nominal fares -73 -161 -284 -252 -277 -321 -553 -819 -832 -871 -902 -934 -965 -994 -1,022<br />
Passengers/Vehicle 234 226 213 214 212 211 178 155 163 166 170 174 178 182 186<br />
93
Table 9. <strong>Mumbai</strong> Suburban Services – Working and Operating Ratios with and without MUTP-2A<br />
2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21<br />
Without MUTP-2A<br />
Working ratio<br />
Incl surcharge 106% 115% 107% 106% 104% 98% 97% 95% 93% 92% 97% 95% 93% 90%<br />
Excl surcharge 114% 124% 121% 120% 116% 114% 111% 108% 105% 102% 97% 95% 93% 90%<br />
Operating ratio<br />
Incl surcharge 127% 138% 128% 127% 125% 118% 116% 114% 112% 110% 116% 114% 111% 108%<br />
Excl surcharge 136% 148% 146% 144% 139% 137% 133% 129% 126% 123% 116% 114% 111% 108%<br />
With MUTP-2A<br />
Working ratio<br />
Incl surcharge 109% 120% 115% 113% 111% 109% 107% 105% 103%<br />
Excl surcharge 126% 137% 130% 128% 124% 121% 117% 114% 111%<br />
Operating ratio<br />
Incl surcharge 131% 144% 138% 136% 134% 131% 129% 126% 123%<br />
Excl surcharge 152% 165% 157% 153% 149% 145% 141% 137% 134%<br />
94
Impact of <strong>Mumbai</strong> Services on IR Financial Performance<br />
284. Table 10 summarizes the estimated revenue and working expenses for key IR<br />
market segments for 2008/2009. This is based on the analyses of the costs of the freight and<br />
passenger services undertaken annually by IR, updated to the 2008/2009 control totals for<br />
revenue and expenditure.<br />
Table 10. Estimated IR Financial Results by Segment 2008/9<br />
Revenue Pass-km/ntk Yield Working expense (Rscr) Unit cost (Ps/tu)<br />
Rs cr (billion) (Ps/unit-km) Labour Non-labour Labour Non-labour<br />
Passengers 20193 571 35.3 10203 8008 17.9 14.0<br />
Other coaching 1964<br />
EMU - <strong>Mumbai</strong> 1250 85 14.8 548 430 6.5 5.1<br />
EMU – other 497 46 10.8 513 403 11.2 8.8<br />
Freight 53433 547 97.8 10317 8097 18.9 14.8<br />
Infrastructure 7706 887 6.2 0.7<br />
Corporate 2525 3666 1339 2.9 1.1<br />
Total WE 79862 1249 64.0 32952 19164 26.4 15.3<br />
(1) Excludes dividend and DRF contributions. Includes pensions (included in labour) and recurrent component of 6 th<br />
Pay Commission. Excludes arrears component of 6 th Pay Commission.<br />
285. The presentation of revenue and working expenses in Table 10 separately<br />
identifies train operation, infrastructure and general administration (‘corporate’) costs. It only<br />
covers working expenses, including pension costs but excluding contributions to DRF and also<br />
any share of the dividends payable to GOI. Thus revenue from the non-EMU passenger services<br />
(including other coaching) made an estimated surplus of Rs 3946 crore over its train operations<br />
costs as a contribution to infrastructure costs, corporate costs and depreciation. Freight, by<br />
contrast, contributed Rs 35,019 crore towards these same costs; it is cross-subsidizing passenger<br />
services, by about Rs 4-5,000 cr , but is also generating all the IR dividend and retained earnings<br />
required for capital projects.<br />
286. The EMU services in general, and the <strong>Mumbai</strong> EMU services in particular, are<br />
relatively small in comparison the IR operations as a whole, with the <strong>Mumbai</strong> services<br />
representing only around two percent of the total working expenses. As a result, the overall IR<br />
surplus is relatively immune to the performance of the <strong>Mumbai</strong> services unless some relatively<br />
extreme policy scenarios are assumed.<br />
95
Environmental Management Aspects<br />
Annex 10: Safeguard Policy Issues<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
287. Most of the components sub-urban rail infrastructure in <strong>Mumbai</strong> that MUTP-2A<br />
proposes to implement are likely to have environmentally beneficial outcomes as rail based mass<br />
transport is far less polluting than any other form of land-based transport. However, limited<br />
negative impacts are expected due to the removal of a few trees, and other important natural and<br />
cultural resources due to the provision of stabling lines and construction of electric substations<br />
for the traction. Most of the negative impacts are however confined to the implementation stage<br />
and can be mitigated with careful environmental management planning. Environmental and<br />
Social (E&S) safeguard frameworks for the project are in line with that approved by the <strong>Bank</strong> for<br />
MUTP-1. E&S risks are very minimal in view of nature and location of activities proposed under<br />
the project. Finally, MRVC has recently been certified to ISO 14001:2004 and ISO 18001:2007<br />
Environmental Management Approach and Instruments<br />
288. Since MUTP-2A builds on the activities initiated under MUTP-1, MRVC began<br />
the environmental assessment with a review of its on-going activities. Using the same<br />
consultants who have assisted in building capacity during MUTP-1, and are therefore familiar<br />
with the current situation and how it has evolved within MRVC and participating <strong>Railway</strong>s, the<br />
review has been supplemented with site visits to all identified candidate sites, and review of<br />
contract documents prepared in MUTP-1 as well as MUTP-2A. A review of the applicable<br />
policies of the GoI, GoM and local regulations of the municipalities, where the subprojects are<br />
proposed was also carried out. Following this, an Environmental Assessment (EA) has been<br />
undertaken with Environmental Management Plans being prepared for each component and<br />
modified to focus on issues specific to individual sites.<br />
289. Baseline assessment of the environmental status within a direct impact zone of<br />
one hundred meters radius of the project site was undertaken. The data collected during from<br />
these visits was analyzed in terms of the type and scale of impact of the project. Detailed field<br />
visit to most of the site location are undertaken to identify and analyze site specific issues based<br />
on following:<br />
(a) Floral and faunal ecological status<br />
(b) Air quality<br />
(c) Noise level<br />
(d) Water quality – Surface and Groundwater, Seawater intrusion status<br />
(e) Soil quality<br />
(f) Land use status<br />
(g) Traffic and transport network<br />
(h) Visual and aesthetic status<br />
(i) Sensitive receptors (such as schools, hospitals etc)<br />
(j) Status of Archaeological, Architectural, Historical, Religious and other such cultural<br />
properties<br />
96
(k) General social features<br />
(l) Hazardous waste handling and disposal<br />
290. Of the various components, the DC to AC conversion --which involves<br />
construction of traction substations, subsectioning and paralleling posts, and sectioning and<br />
paralleling posts-- construction of stabling lines and provision of maintenance facilities for<br />
EMUs were considered to be important from the environment point of view.<br />
291. The EA has been carried out with respect to various components namely land use,<br />
ecology, air quality, noise levels and severance. Depending upon the sub project, other relevant<br />
impact areas have also been considered.Apart from these, activities associated with the project<br />
during the preconstruction, construction and post construction stage are taken in to consideration<br />
to identify the impacts.<br />
Environmental Impacts and Management Measures<br />
292. Based on the overall understanding of the project and assessment of the site<br />
specific issues, ERM has formulated generic and specific Environmental Management Plan.<br />
293. Environmental Bill of Quantities: Based on the impacts identified from the<br />
assessment, the environmental bill of quantities (BoQ) have been estimated and have been<br />
incorporated into the EMP. If required these can be included in the contract for implementation<br />
by contractor/implementing agency.<br />
294. Stabling Lines Construction for Additional EMUs: This activity comprises laying<br />
of short lengths of track (about 300m for about 70 12-car trains) close to ten railway stations<br />
close to where trains terminate/originate. Key impacts include damage to/removal of trees within<br />
the proposed alignment for the stabling line. No other impacts are expected except during the<br />
construction phase when proper mitigation measures can substantially limit/eliminate adverse<br />
impacts. These temporary impacts include: air pollution from stored material and vehicle<br />
movement through congested areas, potential for pollution of water courses close to the<br />
alignments due to spillage of material, increased risk of accidents due to movement of heavy<br />
vehicles in inhabited areas close to the sites. The long term impacts cannot be completely<br />
avoided but would be minimized by careful selection of stabling line alignments, or mitigated by<br />
transplanting trees, identified as important, or compensatory plantation. Of the currently<br />
identified locations, most significant impacts are close to Bhayander staion (North) where the<br />
railway land has rows of trees and the termination point goes very close (~ 50m) to the south<br />
bank of the Bhayander creek where a few mangroves are located at the edge of the creek. While<br />
care would be taken during the construction and the EMP provides for limiting the extent of<br />
construction, accidental damage could result. In case of construction related impacts, the EMP<br />
includes provisions for ensuring that the vehicles used by contractors comply with the standards,<br />
are operated with proper safety considerations, etc. Facilities would be provided for laborers<br />
housed by the contractor and personal protective equipment would be compulsory for all site<br />
workers.<br />
295. Traction Substations and Sectioning Post Installation for DC/AC conversion:<br />
The key impacts pertain to the removal of or damage to trees, and in one/two cases (a very small<br />
97
number of) mangroves due to the project activities. Other impacts are mostly localized and<br />
temporary – pertaining mostly to the construction stage of the project. These include the<br />
deterioration of air quality due to gaseous pollutants and noise, increased risk of traffic accidents<br />
in crowded locations, potential for water quality degradation close to construction sites, handling<br />
of construction and demolition waste, including potential for hazardous waste such as in<br />
locations where older structures need to be dismantled – Chinchpokli, Sion, and Khopoli,<br />
hazardous conditions for on-site labour as well as passers-by given the urban setting for the<br />
activities. Management measures specified under the project include minimization of treecutting,<br />
provision of transplantation and if not possible, compensatory plantation as directed by<br />
the respective Tree Authority under each municipal body has been made for each site.<br />
Precautions are specified to avoid and minimize, if unavoidable, damage to (the very few)<br />
mangroves, close to stabling line extensions like Bhayander. For the construction phase,<br />
following the review of sample contract documents, contractors’ responsibilities are being<br />
specified to ensure that the agreed mitigation measures – limiting pollution from<br />
vehicles/equipment by complying with standards, provision of adequate facilities for housing,<br />
personal protective equipment, including those for preventing electric shocks, and health care for<br />
workers, safe storage of material and equipment, are integrated in appropriate places. In places<br />
locations where special care is required to be exercised, such as in the case of handling asbestos,<br />
the contracts specify the contractors’ responsibilities and methods for handling.<br />
296. Air Pollution Reduction: The conversion to AC from DC would result in about 30<br />
percent of energy savings per coach km traveled (specific energy consumption). Beneficial<br />
environmental impacts due to the project include avoided emissions of local and global air<br />
pollutants. The reduction in the consumption of energy due to use of state-of-the-art technologies<br />
such as regenerative braking, DC to AC conversion would reduce the emissions of particulates,<br />
SOx and NOx at source power plants, reducing local damage. In addition, reduction in specific<br />
energy would also be reduced. It is currently estimated that the approximately 285,000 MWh of<br />
energy saved annually by interventions under the project has the potential to reduce about<br />
228000 t CO2e of GHG emissions.<br />
Environmental Implementation Arrangements<br />
297. As the project components are spread over various authorities such as MRVC, CR<br />
and WR, the institutional setup will play an important role in implementation of the EMPs. Both<br />
MRVC and CR have agreed to hire services of Project Management Consultant (PMC) to<br />
implement activities under the project.<br />
298. MRVC has recently been certified to ISO 14001:2004 and ISO 18001:2007, with<br />
the EMPs developed under MUTP-2A forming the basis on which its performance will be<br />
measured. This certification will lead to streamlined environmental management across all of<br />
MRVC’s operations. The Management Representative required as per the ISO compliant system<br />
will be the Deputy Chief Engineer. S/he would supervise the PMC hired by MRVC and coordinate<br />
with the respective Chief Engineer of CR to confirm compliance with the relevant<br />
provisions of the EMP.<br />
299. The EMP will be implemented through the C.Rly/MRVC by incorporating the<br />
EMP requirements in the contractual agreement. For the contracts to be executed through the<br />
98
participating <strong>Railway</strong>s, it has been agreed that the contractor shall submit a report on compliance<br />
with the environmental mitigation measures (Environmental Compliance Reports, ECRs) before<br />
start of construction activities and periodically thereafter to Project In-charge. As per ISO<br />
14001, a suitable officer in MRVC will be assigned duty of visits to various sites and review of<br />
ECRs at sites and submit a report to <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />
Environmental Management Monitoring and Reporting<br />
300. Monitoring and Reporting would be carried out under the project using the<br />
arrangement developed under MUTP-1. The monitoring and reporting process for mitigation<br />
measures during construction will initiate from the contractor at the lowest rung who will report<br />
to the site engineers of MRVC/CR. CR would report regularly on environmental management<br />
through MRVC and through its Deputy Chief Engineer, MRVC’s own monitoring and reporting<br />
would cover periodic site visit and visual inspections for plantation, provision and use of<br />
personal protective equipment at site, provision of safety measures to avoid accidents, as well as<br />
pollution monitoring for ambient environmental quality – air and water, as appropriate. Bimonthly<br />
meetings under the aegis of the MRVC Deputy Chief Engineer are envisaged where the<br />
subproject specific environmental issues would be discussed at these meetings to be attended by<br />
project Engineers, PMC, and Contractor’s official responsible for environment, health and safety<br />
issues on site.<br />
Social Impacts and Management Measures<br />
301. A part of social impact assessment in the EA focused on identification and<br />
assessment of social impacts including land acquisition requirements and involuntary<br />
resettlement, if any, and likely impact on livelihoods, labor and human safety with a sentence on<br />
social impact assessment method and process. MUTP-2A has been designed in such a way that<br />
there will be no involvement of private land acquisition and Resettlement and Rehabilitation<br />
(R&R) of Project Affected Households (PAHs). MRVC has entered into an understanding with<br />
MMRDA, which will undertake R&R activities on behalf of MRVC as per the MUTP-1 R&R<br />
Policy. MRVC has experience in social safeguard management by way of coordinating LA and<br />
R&R activities for the rail component of the on-going MUTP-1. The expected social impacts of<br />
MUTP-2A are minimal and it will not require to establish a separate Social Unit for the social<br />
safeguard activities; however, MRVC will designate a senior officer in the PMU for monitor and<br />
coordinating social safeguard activities. MRVC will coordinate social safeguard activities with<br />
MMRDA for implementing mitigation measures, which it has the required capacity to manage.<br />
302. Resettlement and Rehabilitation of PAHs: A few railway employees earlier living<br />
at the proposed site at Thane have shifted away soon after the project was announced and some<br />
ten such railway employees living close to the proposed stabling lines site at Bhaindar North<br />
informed during EA that they will shift away before the commencement of the work. As railway<br />
staff, they will be provided with staff quarters or monthly house rent allowance enabling them to<br />
relocate away from this place. A supplementary social impact survey was carried out at the<br />
proposed site for stabling lines at the Virar Scrap yard to assess the nature and magnitude of<br />
impact on 38 structures located close to the railway tracks. The survey findings were as follows:<br />
(a) Out of 38 structures, 37 were residential structures and one was a temple; none will be<br />
99
impacted by the execution of the proposed stabling lines; however, (b) 13 of these structures<br />
located alongside tracks and occupied by railway employees and their families will need to be<br />
shifted away for safety reasons; they will be provided with staff quarters or receive monthly<br />
house rent allowance enabling them to relocate; (c) the other structures including a temple and<br />
residences for 18 squatter households and six tenants (in private houses) are beyond the<br />
execution zone and will not need to be relocated; (d) the execution areas and the railway tracks at<br />
this stretch will be barricaded for enhancing human safety. Some lands required for the project<br />
have been licensed out by the <strong>Railway</strong>s to its employees for vegetable cultivation in order to<br />
prevent encroachment. These licenses are issued on annual basis and will normally be allowed to<br />
run their course before the work commences. In cases where this is not possible, the licenses will<br />
be terminated with one month’s advance notice as per the license terms and conditions by the<br />
<strong>Railway</strong>s providing the licensees with sufficient time to harvest crops and salvage assets if any<br />
before such licenses come to an end.<br />
303. In order to deal with any future involuntary resettlement impacts due to any<br />
alteration in design or outlay, MRVC has prepared and adopted a Social Management<br />
Framework (SMF) which is detailed under the R&R Policy, which was adopted for the ongoing<br />
MUTP and is satisfactory to the <strong>Bank</strong>, setting forth the rules and procedures for carrying out any<br />
social, resettlement and rehabilitation activities under the Project, including identification,<br />
assessment and mitigation of potential environmental and social impacts arising from the Project,<br />
carrying out consultations, processing and redressing grievances, monitoring related impacts,<br />
and, if required, limited resettlement and rehabilitation action plans and other development and<br />
entitlement plans for people adversely affected as result of Project implementation. If<br />
resettlement is needed MRVC will prepare a specific resettlement action plan (RAP) based on<br />
the SMF and that is found to be acceptable and satisfactory to the <strong>Bank</strong><br />
304. The SMF referred to and outlined in the Chapter-3 of the Project Implementation<br />
Manual provides that any necessary resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) measures required<br />
due to any future alterations in design or layout will be carried out by MMRDA on behalf of<br />
MRVC as per the MUTP R&R Policy. If resettlement is needed MRVC will prepare a specific<br />
resettlement action plan (RAP) based on the SMF and that is found to be acceptable and<br />
satisfactory to the <strong>Bank</strong> This arrangement is a continuation of the arrangement established for<br />
implementing R&R measures for the rail component of MUTP. MRVC’s main task will be to<br />
coordinate efforts with MMRDA for carrying out the mitigation measures, for management of<br />
which it has the required capacity. MMRDA already has sufficient experience and capacity for<br />
handling the issues related to R&R for MUTP-2A.<br />
305. The project is to be executed entirely in urban area so there is no impact envisaged<br />
on Tribal community.<br />
306. Bid documents will include provisions to minimize social risks in order to prevent<br />
engagement of child labor, address human safety and hazard risk reduction, ensure equal wages,<br />
and social security measures under applicable labor laws.<br />
307. The safety and health hazards to the nearby community and sensitive receptors if<br />
any shall also be looked for. Mitigation majors shall be framed accordingly and included in the<br />
EMPs for individual projects if required.<br />
100
308. Land Acquisition: There is no land acquisition, and if there will be any in future,<br />
MRVC will carry out LA through the state government as per applicable procedures.<br />
309. Completion of R&R activities under on-going MUTP-1: The R&R activities for<br />
the <strong>Railway</strong> sub-projects of MUTP-1 have been substantially completed as per applicable norms<br />
set out in the loan agreement as confirmed by MRVC. About 196 land owners whose land was<br />
required for the construction of the Virar Car shed have received 80 percent advance<br />
compensation and the payment of the remaining 20 percent is under process by the GOM with<br />
MRVC funds.<br />
310. Gender and social inclusion: The IR has recently started taking remarkable steps<br />
to address gender and social inclusion aspects in its operations. Sensitivity to issues of<br />
involuntary resettlement is evident in the passing of the <strong>Railway</strong>s Amendment Act, 2008. It is<br />
one of the few such documents to confirm the application of the National Resettlement and<br />
Rehabilitation Policy, 2007. IR’s decision to introduce special passes for the HIV-affected,<br />
students, etc., and introduction of special local trains for women in peak hours are some other<br />
notable examples. In this context, the <strong>Bank</strong> in cooperation with MRVC will conduct a gender<br />
needs assessment in <strong>Mumbai</strong>’s urban transport system. It will help prepare a gender action plan,<br />
which could be piloted in the <strong>Mumbai</strong> suburban railways in future.<br />
Social Management Implementation, Monitoring and Reporting<br />
311. In case of any future alterations in project design requiring LA and R&R, day to<br />
day implementation and monitoring of social safeguard management will be done by MMRDA<br />
whereas MRVC will undertake regular stock taking and prepare status updates.<br />
312. MRVC will monitor the coordination of civil works with any necessary R&R<br />
activities undertaken by MMRDA in future. A single evaluation of social impact mitigation and<br />
value added activities will be undertaken at the end of the implementation for future learning,<br />
provided LA and R&R activities are undertaken as a result of design change.<br />
101
Annex 11: Project Preparation and Supervision<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
Planned<br />
Actual<br />
PCN review 05/14/2009 05/14/2009<br />
Initial PID to PIC 06/04/2009 06/03/2009<br />
Initial ISDS to PIC 06/08/2009 06/05/2009<br />
Appraisal 04/20/2010 02/08/2010<br />
Negotiations 05/07/2010 05/07/2010<br />
Board/RVP approval 06/29/2010<br />
Planned date of effectiveness 09/15/2010<br />
Planned date of mid-term review 02/28/2013<br />
Planned closing date 06/15/2015<br />
Key institutions responsible for preparation of the project:<br />
Government of India, <strong>Mumbai</strong> <strong>Railway</strong> <strong>Vikas</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> <strong>Ltd</strong>.<br />
<strong>Bank</strong> staff and consultants who worked on the project included:<br />
Name Title Unit<br />
Hubert Nove-Josserand Team Leader/Sr. Urban Transport Spec. SASDT<br />
Atul Agarwal Transport Specialist SASDT<br />
Ramola Bhuyan Sr. Financial Mgmt. Spec. SARFM<br />
Satya N. Mishra Social Development Spec. SASDS<br />
Manmohan Singh Bajaj<br />
Abduljabbar H. Al Qathab<br />
Senior Procurement Specialist<br />
Senior Procurement Specialist<br />
SARPS<br />
SARPS<br />
Gaurav D. Joshi Environmental Specialist SASDI<br />
Vasile Olievschi Sr. <strong>Railway</strong> Specialist ECSS5<br />
Gennady Pilch<br />
David Freese<br />
Krishnan Srinivasan<br />
Sr. Counsel<br />
Sr. Finance Officer<br />
Consultant<br />
LEGES<br />
CTRFC<br />
SASDT<br />
Jitendra Sondhi Consultant SASDT<br />
Ed Dotson Consultant SASDT<br />
Alok Nath Bansal Consultant SASDT<br />
Richard G. Bullock Consultant SASDT<br />
Jorge M. Rebelo Lead Transport Spec./Peer Reviewer LCSTR<br />
John Scales Lead Transport Spec./Peer Reviewer EASCS<br />
Shomik Raj Mehndiratta Sr. Transport. Spec./Peer Reviewer EASCS<br />
Radia Benamghar Operations Analyst SASDT<br />
Natalya Stankevich Operations Analyst SASDT<br />
Gizella Díaz Program Assistant SASDO<br />
Ritu Sharma Program Assistant SASDO<br />
Bogdan Filip Popescu E T Temporary SASDT<br />
<strong>Bank</strong> funds expended to date on project preparation: The breakdown is as follows: (1) <strong>Bank</strong><br />
resources: US$407,900, (2) Trust funds: none, (3) Total: US$407,900.<br />
Estimated Approval and Supervision costs: The breakdown is as follows: (1) Remaining costs to<br />
approval: US$25,000, (2) Estimated annual supervision cost: US$200,000.<br />
102
Annex 12: <strong>Document</strong>s in the Project File<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
Client’s documents<br />
1. MoUD, “National Urban Transport Policy”, April 2006<br />
2. MMRDA, “Comprehensive Transportation Study (CTS) for <strong>Mumbai</strong> Metropolitan Region”,<br />
LEA International <strong>Ltd</strong>. in joint venture with LEA Associates South Asia Pvt. <strong>Ltd</strong>.,<br />
Consultant Draft Final Report, April 2008<br />
3. MRVC, “Social Management Framework for MUTP- 2A”, April 2010<br />
4. MRVC, “Draft Environmental Assessment Report and Environmental Management Plan”,<br />
Environmental Resources Management India (ERM), March 2010<br />
<strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>’s documents<br />
5. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Policy Note: Towards A Discussion of Support to Urban Transport<br />
Development in India, March, 2005<br />
6. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>, Integrated Safeguard Data Sheet, April 2010<br />
7. <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>, Project Information <strong>Document</strong> (PID) Appraisal Stage, March 2010<br />
103
Annex 13: Statement of Loans and Credits<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
Original Amount in US$ Millions<br />
Difference between<br />
expected and actual<br />
disbursements<br />
Project ID FY Purpose IBRD IDA SF GEF Cancel. Undisb. Orig. Frm.<br />
Rev’d<br />
P100735 2009 Orissa Community Tank<br />
Management Project<br />
56.00 56.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 104.96 -2.71 0.00<br />
P102331 2009 MPDPIP-II 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.26 0.00 0.00<br />
P100101 2009 Coal-Fired Generation<br />
180.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Rehabilitation<br />
P093478 2009 Orissa Rural Livelihoods<br />
0.00 82.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.06 -0.47 0.00<br />
Project<br />
P096023 2009 Orissa State Roads 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 249.38 0.00 0.00<br />
P094360 2009 National VBD ControlandPolio 0.00 521.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 488.67 13.98 0.00<br />
Eradication<br />
P112033 2009 UP Sodic III 0.00 197.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 197.60 0.00 0.00<br />
P095114 2008 Rampur Hydropower Project 400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 318.30 9.30 0.00<br />
P105124 2008 HP DPL I 135.00 65.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.75 0.00 0.00<br />
P102737 2008 Bihar DPL 150.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 111.86 111.10 0.00<br />
P102547 2008 Elementary Education (SSA II) 0.00 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 354.45 2.47 0.00<br />
P101653 2008 Power System Development 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 602.32 -50.68 0.00<br />
Project IV<br />
P090585 2007 Punjab State Roads Project 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 143.81 -12.19 0.00<br />
P090768 2007 TN IAM WARM 335.00 150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 428.73 104.56 0.00<br />
P090592 2007 Punjab Rural Water Supply and 0.00 154.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 142.37 81.77 0.00<br />
Sanitation<br />
P096019 2007 HP State Roads Project 220.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 195.63 24.58 0.00<br />
P083187 2007 Uttaranchal RWSS 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 111.87 49.60 0.00<br />
P090764 2007 Bihar Rural Livelihoods<br />
0.00 63.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.64 3.06 0.00<br />
Project<br />
P102768 2007 Stren India's Rural Credit 300.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 286.88 135.25 0.00<br />
Coops<br />
P071160 2007 Karnataka Health Systems 0.00 141.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 81.60 -13.09 0.00<br />
P100789 2007 AP Community Tank<br />
94.50 94.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 178.37 22.55 0.00<br />
Management Project<br />
P075060 2007 RCH II 0.00 360.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 204.28 42.95 0.00<br />
P075174 2007 AP DPL III 150.00 75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.02 -77.33 0.00<br />
P078538 2007 Third National HIV/AIDS<br />
0.00 250.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 196.46 116.73 0.00<br />
Control Project<br />
P078539 2007 TB II 0.00 170.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 112.22 -13.22 0.00<br />
P099047 2007 Vocational Training India 0.00 280.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 218.34 -0.31 0.00<br />
P093720 2006 Mid-Himalayan (HP)<br />
0.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.24 3.60 0.00<br />
Watersheds<br />
P079675 2006 Karn Municipal Reform 216.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 173.84 70.84 0.00<br />
P092735 2006 NAIP 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166.10 55.09 0.00<br />
P079708 2006 TN Empwr and Pov Reduction 0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.21 30.25 0.00<br />
P078832 2006 Karnataka Panchayats<br />
0.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.92 -33.18 0.00<br />
Strengthening Proj<br />
P083780 2006 TN Urban III 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 195.60 101.35 0.00<br />
104
P086414 2006 Power System Development 400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.86 -126.14 0.00<br />
Project III<br />
P094513 2005 India Tsunami ERC 0.00 465.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 391.28 387.96 0.00<br />
P073370 2005 Madhya Pradesh Water Sector 394.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 304.11 224.36 0.00<br />
Restructurin<br />
P073651 2005 DISEASE SURVEILLANCE 0.00 68.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.43 44.49 0.00<br />
P075058 2005 TN HEALTH SYSTEMS 0.00 110.83 0.00 0.00 20.06 38.88 48.13 22.23<br />
P077856 2005 Lucknow-Muzaffarpur National 620.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 237.18 87.18 0.00<br />
Highway<br />
P077977 2005 Rural Roads Project 99.50 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 107.69 69.21 0.00<br />
P086518 2005 SME Financing and<br />
520.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Development<br />
P084792 2005 Assam Agric Competitiveness 0.00 154.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91.83 68.88 -0.00<br />
P084790 2005 MAHAR WSIP 325.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 228.41 129.41 0.00<br />
P084632 2005 Hydrology II 104.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 84.26 71.71 42.45<br />
P078550 2004 Uttar Wtrshed 0.00 69.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.95 2.47 0.00<br />
P050655 2004 RAJASTHAN HEALTH<br />
0.00 89.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.26 32.58 0.00<br />
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT<br />
P076467 2003 Chatt DRPP 0.00 112.56 0.00 0.00 20.06 50.28 57.05 0.00<br />
P073094 2003 AP Comm Forest Mgmt 0.00 108.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.62 0.16 0.00<br />
P071272 2003 AP RURAL POV<br />
0.00 215.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.19 -58.48 0.00<br />
REDUCTION<br />
P050649 2003 TN ROADS 348.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.97 61.97 0.00<br />
P067606 2003 UP ROADS 488.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93.47 93.47 0.00<br />
P050647 2002 UP WSRP 0.00 149.20 0.00 0.00 40.11 73.38 85.16 0.00<br />
P050653 2002 KARNATAKA RWSS II 0.00 151.60 0.00 0.00 15.04 16.33 3.95 0.00<br />
P050668 2002 MUMBAI URBAN<br />
463.00 79.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 255.19 243.09 112.09<br />
TRANSPORT PROJECT<br />
P040610 2002 RAJ WSRP 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 25.84 41.20 28.74 0.00<br />
P069889 2002 MIZORAM ROADS 0.00 78.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.43 -13.12 0.00<br />
P071033 2002 KARN Tank Mgmt 32.00 130.90 0.00 0.00 25.07 110.97 51.19 -5.69<br />
P072539 2002 KERALA STATE<br />
255.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93.42 93.42 0.00<br />
TRANSPORT<br />
Total: 8,086.00 6,775.47 0.00 0.00 146.18 8,945.33 2,462.69 171.08<br />
INDIA<br />
STATEMENT OF IFC’s<br />
Held and Disbursed Portfolio<br />
In Millions of US Dollars<br />
Committed<br />
Disbursed<br />
IFC<br />
IFC<br />
FY Approval Company Loan Equity Quasi Partic. Loan Equity Quasi Partic.<br />
2005 ADPCL 39.50 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 AHEL 0.00 5.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.08 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 AP Paper Mills 35.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 5.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 APIDC Biotech 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.01 0.00 0.00<br />
2002 ATL 13.81 0.00 0.00 9.36 13.81 0.00 0.00 9.36<br />
2003 ATL 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 ATL 9.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
105
2006 Atul <strong>Ltd</strong> 16.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2003 BHF 10.30 0.00 10.30 0.00 10.30 0.00 10.30 0.00<br />
2004 BILT 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00<br />
2001 BTVL 0.43 3.98 0.00 0.00 0.43 3.98 0.00 0.00<br />
2003 Balrampur 10.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.52 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2001 Basix <strong>Ltd</strong>. 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 Bharat Biotech 0.00 0.00 4.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.30 0.00<br />
1984 Bihar Sponge 5.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.70 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2003 CCIL 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 CCIL 7.00 2.00 0.00 12.40 7.00 2.00 0.00 12.40<br />
1990 CESC 4.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.61 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
1992 CESC 6.55 0.00 0.00 14.59 6.55 0.00 0.00 14.59<br />
2004 CGL 14.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.38 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2004 CMScomputers 0.00 10.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2002 COSMO 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 COSMO 0.00 3.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.73 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 Chennai Water 24.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2003 DQEL 0.00 1.50 1.50 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.50 0.00<br />
2005 DSCL 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 DSCL 15.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 Dabur 0.00 14.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.09 0.00 0.00<br />
2003 Dewan 8.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.68 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 Federal <strong>Bank</strong> 0.00 28.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.99 0.00 0.00<br />
2001 GTF Fact 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 GTF Fact 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00<br />
1994 GVK 0.00 4.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.83 0.00 0.00<br />
2003 HDFC 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100.00<br />
1998 IAAF 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 IAL 0.00 9.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.70 0.00 0.00<br />
1998 IDFC 0.00 10.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.82 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 IDFC 50.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 100.00<br />
IHDC 6.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 IHDC 7.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 Indecomm 0.00 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.57 0.00 0.00<br />
1996 India Direct Fnd 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00<br />
2001 Indian Seamless 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 JK Paper 15.00 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.38 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 K Mahindra INDIA 22.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 KPIT 11.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 8.00 2.50 0.00 0.00<br />
2003 LandT 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 LGB 14.21 4.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.82 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 Lok Fund 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2002 MMFSL 7.89 0.00 7.51 0.00 7.89 0.00 7.51 0.00<br />
2003 MSSL 0.00 2.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.20 0.00 0.00<br />
2001 MahInfra 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.00<br />
Montalvo 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 0.00 0.00<br />
1996 Moser Baer 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00<br />
1999 Moser Baer 0.00 8.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.74 0.00 0.00<br />
2000 Moser Baer 12.75 10.54 0.00 0.00 12.75 10.54 0.00 0.00<br />
106
Nevis 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2003 NewPath 0.00 9.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.31 0.00 0.00<br />
2004 NewPath 0.00 2.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.49 0.00 0.00<br />
2003 Niko Resources 24.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.44 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2001 Orchid 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00<br />
1997 Owens Corning 5.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.92 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 PSL Limited 15.00 4.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.54 0.00 0.00<br />
2004 Powerlinks 72.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.16 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2004 RAK India 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
1995 Rain Calcining 0.00 2.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.29 0.00 0.00<br />
2004 Rain Calcining 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 Ramky 3.74 10.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 Ruchi Soya 0.00 9.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.77 0.00 0.00<br />
2001 SBI 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
1997 SREI 3.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.21 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2000 SREI 6.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.50 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
1995 Sara Fund 0.00 3.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.43 0.00 0.00<br />
2004 SeaLion 4.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.40 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2001 Spryance 0.00 1.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.86 0.00 0.00<br />
2003 Spryance 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.00<br />
2004 Sundaram Finance 42.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 42.93 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2000 Sundaram Home 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.18 0.00 0.00<br />
2002 Sundaram Home 6.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.71 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
1998 TCW/ICICI 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 TISCO 100.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2004 UPL 15.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.45 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
1996 United Riceland 5.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.63 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 United Riceland 8.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2002 Usha Martin 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00<br />
2001 Vysya <strong>Bank</strong> 0.00 3.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.66 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 Vysya <strong>Bank</strong> 0.00 3.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.51 0.00 0.00<br />
1997 WIV 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00<br />
1997 Walden-Mgt India 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 iLabs Fund II 0.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Total portfolio: 956.52 249.41 42.30 536.35 604.74 175.91 38.60 236.35<br />
Approvals Pending Commitment<br />
FY Approval Company Loan Equity Quasi Partic.<br />
2004 CGL 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2000 APCL 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 Atul <strong>Ltd</strong> 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00<br />
2001 Vysya <strong>Bank</strong> 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2006 Federal <strong>Bank</strong> 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2001 GI Wind Farms 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2004 Ocean Sparkle 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
2005 Allain Duhangan 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00<br />
Total pending commitment: 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00<br />
107
Annex 14: Country at a Glance<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
108
109
Annex 15: Maps<br />
INDIA: <strong>Mumbai</strong> Urban Transport Project-2A<br />
110
To Palghar<br />
VAITARNA<br />
INDIA<br />
MUMBAI URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT IIA<br />
Rail Components<br />
Virar Northwest 3<br />
6<br />
Virar Northeast<br />
MUTP IIA RAIL PROJECT COMPONENTS:<br />
COMPONENT 1<br />
PROCUREMENT OF 72 NEW TECHNOLOGY EMU TRAINS<br />
COMPONENT 2<br />
MUTP I RAIL PROJECT COMPONENTS:<br />
TRACTION SUBSTATIONS<br />
RAIL (5TH LINE)<br />
RAIL (PAIR OF LINES)<br />
16<br />
Virar Cutting Yard<br />
VIRAR<br />
6<br />
DC TO AC CONVERSION (INCLUDING<br />
SIGNAL AND TELECOM IMPROVEMENTS)<br />
NON-BANK FUNDED TRACTION SUBSTATIONS<br />
BANK FUNDED TRACTION SUBSTATIONS<br />
COMPONENT 3<br />
EMU LOCATION AND NUMBER OF STABLING LINES<br />
AT THE LOCATION<br />
EXISTING:<br />
RAILWAY STATIONS<br />
MAIN ROADS<br />
ROAD UNDER CONSTRUCTION<br />
LOCAL ROADS<br />
RAILROADS<br />
METRO LINE 1<br />
M<br />
METRO STATIONS ON LINE 1<br />
Vasai Road Southwest 2<br />
VASAI ROAD<br />
To Kasara Station,<br />
3 stabling lines,<br />
xx km from <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST<br />
<strong>Mumbai</strong><br />
1<br />
Titwala<br />
Manori Creek<br />
Borivali Northwest 4<br />
Borivali Southwest<br />
3<br />
Malad Creek<br />
M<br />
M<br />
M<br />
MAHIM - BETWEEN LINE BORIVALI<br />
5TH<br />
GOREGAON<br />
Oshiwara<br />
JOGESHWARI<br />
BORIVALI - PAIR VIRAR OF LINES<br />
ADDITIONAL<br />
WESTERN EXPRESSWAY<br />
BORIVALI<br />
MALAD<br />
EAST<br />
EASTERN EXPRESSWAY<br />
LINES<br />
- OF T KURLA HANE PAIR ADDITION A L<br />
THANE<br />
Thane<br />
DIVA<br />
12<br />
Thakurli<br />
KALYAN<br />
1<br />
Ambarnath<br />
To Karjat Station,<br />
2 stabling lines,<br />
99 km from <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST<br />
to Khopoli Station,<br />
5 stabling lines,<br />
xx km from <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST<br />
ANDHERI<br />
M<br />
M<br />
M<br />
M<br />
NAVI<br />
MUMBAI<br />
ARABIAN<br />
SEA<br />
SANTA CRUZ<br />
SAKINAKA<br />
M M<br />
MM<br />
M<br />
M<br />
M<br />
Thane Creek<br />
0 5<br />
KILOMETERS<br />
BANDRA<br />
Bandra<br />
Kurla<br />
Sion<br />
4<br />
Sion<br />
4<br />
CHEMBUR<br />
MANKHURD<br />
HARBOUR LINE<br />
MAHIM<br />
Mahim<br />
Bay<br />
DADAR<br />
SATIS<br />
WESTERN RAILWAY<br />
Wadala<br />
Road<br />
Belapur<br />
4<br />
Chinchpokli<br />
Mahalaxmi<br />
CENTRAL RAILWAY<br />
Panvel Creek<br />
3<br />
Panvel<br />
ATC<br />
PILOT<br />
PROJECT<br />
CHURCHGATE<br />
CST<br />
MUMBAI<br />
SHEVA<br />
JANUARY 2010<br />
URAN<br />
This map was produced by the<br />
Map Design Unit of The <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong>.<br />
The boundaries, colors, denominations<br />
and any other information shown on<br />
this map do not imply, on the part of<br />
The <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> Group, any judgment<br />
on the legal status of any territory, or<br />
any endorsement or acceptance of<br />
such boundaries.<br />
To Karjat Station,<br />
2 stabling lines,<br />
99 km from <strong>Mumbai</strong> CST<br />
IBRD 37317