22.01.2015 Views

Legal Rights of Persons With Disabilities - Ossh.com

Legal Rights of Persons With Disabilities - Ossh.com

Legal Rights of Persons With Disabilities - Ossh.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a. General<br />

Any party dissatisfied with the hearing <strong>of</strong>ficer's decision can file a lawsuit. The lawsuit can be<br />

filed in either federal district court or California superior court. Generally, a parent or child must exhaust<br />

the administrative remedies available before filing a lawsuit. In other words, a parent must file a <strong>com</strong>plaint<br />

with the Superintendent <strong>of</strong> Public Instruction and use the hearing process before filing a lawsuit in federal<br />

or state court. (Smith v. Robinson (1984) 468 U.S. 992.) In some cases a court will hear the suit without<br />

use <strong>of</strong> the administrative process, but this is generally only allowed where the hearing would be futile (as<br />

where a child with a similar problem was already denied relief) or where the school district has failed in its<br />

statutory duty to inform the parents <strong>of</strong> the <strong>com</strong>plaint procedures. (Doe v. Maher (9th Cir. 1986) 793 F.2d<br />

1470.)<br />

b. The Child's Placement During Judicial Review<br />

If the hearing <strong>of</strong>ficer decides in favor <strong>of</strong> the parents <strong>of</strong> a child with a disability, then the school<br />

district must immediately obey the hearing <strong>of</strong>ficer's order. Only a judge may permit the school district to<br />

disregard the hearing <strong>of</strong>ficer's decision.<br />

Federal law gives parents the right to insist that their child remain wherever he or she was before<br />

the dispute arose, during both administrative and judicial review. This means that the school district may<br />

not change a child's status, program, services or placement over the parents' objections, even if the hearing<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer decides in favor <strong>of</strong> the school district, unless a court issues an order to the contrary. (20 U.S.C. '<br />

1415(j).)<br />

If the hearing <strong>of</strong>ficer decides in favor <strong>of</strong> the school district and denies a child a type <strong>of</strong> program,<br />

service, or placement that the parents think the child needs, the parents can ask the judge for a preliminary<br />

injunction ordering the school district to provide what is needed. The parents can also arrange privately for<br />

the child to receive the educational program, services, or placement that he or she needs. If the parents<br />

ultimately prove that the hearing <strong>of</strong>ficer's decision was wrong, and that their child does need what the<br />

parents provided privately, the school district will be required to repay the parents their costs. (Doe v.<br />

Brookline School Committee (1st Cir. 1983) 722 F.2d 910.) Of course, if the judge ultimately decides that<br />

the hearing <strong>of</strong>ficer was right, then the parents must pay for the privately-arranged program, services, or<br />

placement themselves.<br />

c. Court Proceedings<br />

The trial judge makes an independent decision on the basis <strong>of</strong> both the hearing <strong>of</strong>ficer's decision<br />

and any additional evidence which is presented.<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!