Risk Analysis of Sea Traffic in the Area around Bornholm, 2008. - VTT
Risk Analysis of Sea Traffic in the Area around Bornholm, 2008. - VTT
Risk Analysis of Sea Traffic in the Area around Bornholm, 2008. - VTT
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> for <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>around</strong> <strong>Bornholm</strong><br />
41<br />
6 Prospective <strong>Risk</strong> Assessment <strong>of</strong> Route<br />
Specifications for <strong>Traffic</strong> to and from <strong>the</strong><br />
Gdańsk Bay<br />
6.1 Hazard identification (FSA Step 1)<br />
The hazard identification was performed dur<strong>in</strong>g Workshop I. Its result is displayed<br />
as a list <strong>in</strong> Appendix F.<br />
It is common to rank hazards <strong>in</strong> a qualitative way <strong>in</strong> order to determ<strong>in</strong>e, which<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m deserve quantitative <strong>in</strong>vestigation. However, it turned out that all significant<br />
hazards are covered by <strong>the</strong> accident models considered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> present<br />
study (compare chapter 4). Therefore, rank<strong>in</strong>g is regarded as be<strong>in</strong>g futile <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
present context.<br />
6.2 <strong>Risk</strong> control options (FSA Step 3)<br />
6.2.1 Description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> risk control measures<br />
Danish Maritime Authority asked for assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> a possible vessel<br />
draught limitation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area north-east and south <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bornholm</strong>. This affects<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly traffic related to <strong>the</strong> ports <strong>of</strong> Gdańsk, Kal<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>grad and Klaipėda. The<br />
limitations are meant to<br />
• take all ships sail<strong>in</strong>g north-east <strong>of</strong> Adlergrund with a draught between 7<br />
and 10 m and divert <strong>the</strong>m to <strong>the</strong> area south <strong>of</strong> Adlergrund (both located<br />
south <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bornholm</strong>, as illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 11)<br />
• take all ships sail<strong>in</strong>g south <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bornholm</strong> with a draught above 10 m and<br />
divert <strong>the</strong>m to <strong>the</strong> area north-east <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bornholm</strong>.<br />
The geographical arrangement is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 2 at <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
report.<br />
6.2.2 Modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> risk control measures<br />
As a first step, <strong>the</strong> above-described risk control measures need to be <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />
<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> model. This is done by tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> observed traffic and rearrang<strong>in</strong>g it<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> traffic diversion described above.<br />
P:\65775A\3_Pdoc\DOC\P-65775A ma<strong>in</strong> report f<strong>in</strong>al corr prepared for PDF.DOC<br />
.