22.01.2015 Views

Risk Analysis of Sea Traffic in the Area around Bornholm, 2008. - VTT

Risk Analysis of Sea Traffic in the Area around Bornholm, 2008. - VTT

Risk Analysis of Sea Traffic in the Area around Bornholm, 2008. - VTT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> for <strong>Sea</strong> <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>around</strong> <strong>Bornholm</strong><br />

41<br />

6 Prospective <strong>Risk</strong> Assessment <strong>of</strong> Route<br />

Specifications for <strong>Traffic</strong> to and from <strong>the</strong><br />

Gdańsk Bay<br />

6.1 Hazard identification (FSA Step 1)<br />

The hazard identification was performed dur<strong>in</strong>g Workshop I. Its result is displayed<br />

as a list <strong>in</strong> Appendix F.<br />

It is common to rank hazards <strong>in</strong> a qualitative way <strong>in</strong> order to determ<strong>in</strong>e, which<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m deserve quantitative <strong>in</strong>vestigation. However, it turned out that all significant<br />

hazards are covered by <strong>the</strong> accident models considered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> present<br />

study (compare chapter 4). Therefore, rank<strong>in</strong>g is regarded as be<strong>in</strong>g futile <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

present context.<br />

6.2 <strong>Risk</strong> control options (FSA Step 3)<br />

6.2.1 Description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> risk control measures<br />

Danish Maritime Authority asked for assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> a possible vessel<br />

draught limitation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area north-east and south <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bornholm</strong>. This affects<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly traffic related to <strong>the</strong> ports <strong>of</strong> Gdańsk, Kal<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>grad and Klaipėda. The<br />

limitations are meant to<br />

• take all ships sail<strong>in</strong>g north-east <strong>of</strong> Adlergrund with a draught between 7<br />

and 10 m and divert <strong>the</strong>m to <strong>the</strong> area south <strong>of</strong> Adlergrund (both located<br />

south <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bornholm</strong>, as illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 11)<br />

• take all ships sail<strong>in</strong>g south <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bornholm</strong> with a draught above 10 m and<br />

divert <strong>the</strong>m to <strong>the</strong> area north-east <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bornholm</strong>.<br />

The geographical arrangement is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 2 at <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

report.<br />

6.2.2 Modell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> risk control measures<br />

As a first step, <strong>the</strong> above-described risk control measures need to be <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> model. This is done by tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> observed traffic and rearrang<strong>in</strong>g it<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> traffic diversion described above.<br />

P:\65775A\3_Pdoc\DOC\P-65775A ma<strong>in</strong> report f<strong>in</strong>al corr prepared for PDF.DOC<br />

.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!