'Honour Killings' in Pakistan and Compliance of ... - Aurat Foundation
'Honour Killings' in Pakistan and Compliance of ... - Aurat Foundation
'Honour Killings' in Pakistan and Compliance of ... - Aurat Foundation
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
motive 29 . The new law def<strong>in</strong>ed honour kill<strong>in</strong>gs as voluntary suicide. Also,<br />
family members who encourage another member <strong>of</strong> the family to commit<br />
a murder or to commit suicide will be punished. Those who encourage<br />
children to commit a crime will be punished more severely.<br />
‘Honour Kill<strong>in</strong>gs’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pakistan</strong>i Law<br />
In <strong>Pakistan</strong>, honour kill<strong>in</strong>gs have regularly come for consideration before<br />
the courts for years. Until 2004, there was no specific legislation deal<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with the issue. As a result, there is a huge body <strong>of</strong> jurisprudence pre-2004<br />
that has been provid<strong>in</strong>g narrow <strong>in</strong>terpretations <strong>and</strong> discrim<strong>in</strong>atory<br />
judgments for a long time. It is important to take a cursory look at how<br />
the law on honour kill<strong>in</strong>gs un-folded <strong>in</strong> order to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
appreciate how the courts deal with honour kill<strong>in</strong>g cases currently. It is<br />
important also to have this <strong>in</strong>formation to be able to analyse <strong>and</strong> see<br />
whether there has been modification <strong>and</strong> advancement <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>dset <strong>of</strong><br />
the judiciary while over-see<strong>in</strong>g such cases.<br />
Honour Kill<strong>in</strong>g Cases pre 2004<br />
In pre-partition cases, as Warraich 30 notes, it was a norm that a husb<strong>and</strong><br />
could benefit from the exception <strong>of</strong> ‘grave <strong>and</strong> provocation plea’ if he<br />
killed his wife or her alleged lover if they were guilty <strong>of</strong> adultery. The<br />
courts were quite will<strong>in</strong>g to give this plea a broad <strong>in</strong>terpretation. In the<br />
<strong>in</strong>itial post-<strong>in</strong>dependence years, court cont<strong>in</strong>ued to give token sentences<br />
to perpetrators <strong>of</strong> alleged ‘honour kill<strong>in</strong>gs’. Yasmeen Hassan notes that<br />
the benefit <strong>of</strong> the plea was extended to men, giv<strong>in</strong>g them authority to<br />
29 Department <strong>of</strong> State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices – 2004: Turkey,<br />
Bureau <strong>of</strong> Democracy, Human Rights <strong>and</strong> Labor, at 13 (Feb. 28, 2005), available at<br />
http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2004/41713.htm<br />
30 ‘Honour Kill<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> the Law <strong>in</strong> <strong>Pakistan</strong>’, Sohail Akbar Warraich, ‘Honour’ Crimes,<br />
Paradigms, And Violence Aga<strong>in</strong>st Women, Edited by Lynn Welchman, Sara Hossa<strong>in</strong>,<br />
Oxford University Press, 2005<br />
27