'Honour Killings' in Pakistan and Compliance of ... - Aurat Foundation
'Honour Killings' in Pakistan and Compliance of ... - Aurat Foundation
'Honour Killings' in Pakistan and Compliance of ... - Aurat Foundation
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
this issue has resulted <strong>in</strong> a spill over <strong>of</strong> ‘hounor’ kill<strong>in</strong>gs to a number <strong>of</strong><br />
foreign countries primarily through <strong>Pakistan</strong>i immigrant communities.<br />
In 2004, when after persistent efforts <strong>of</strong> women’s rights organizations <strong>and</strong><br />
committed activists, along with active women <strong>in</strong> political parties, some<br />
legal amendments were made to <strong>Pakistan</strong> Penal Code to address the issue<br />
<strong>of</strong> ‘honour’ crimes through an act <strong>of</strong> Parliament, it turned out to be a<br />
‘victory’ more shrouded <strong>in</strong> disappo<strong>in</strong>tment than joy. Besides jubilant<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficial claims <strong>of</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g headway <strong>in</strong> resolv<strong>in</strong>g the issue, the response <strong>of</strong><br />
civil society organizations was straightforward: “the law has no teeth – it<br />
will be <strong>in</strong>effective”. S<strong>in</strong>ce, Shahla Zia from <strong>Aurat</strong> <strong>Foundation</strong> was the<br />
prime architect <strong>of</strong> the legislative bill which was h<strong>and</strong>ed over to the<br />
federal women’s m<strong>in</strong>istry for legislative action, <strong>and</strong> she along with some<br />
senior members <strong>of</strong> the Legislative Watch Group <strong>in</strong> Islamabad, Tahira<br />
Abdullah, Sabira Qureshi, Nasreen Azhar <strong>and</strong> myself were participants to<br />
the negotiations with the m<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>in</strong> 2004, it became clear, as well as<br />
pa<strong>in</strong>ful for us to know that despite our protest <strong>and</strong> reservations, the<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>al bill prepared by Shahla Zia was be<strong>in</strong>g severely ‘mutilated’ with<br />
the f<strong>in</strong>al outcome that its most vital clauses were dropped when it was<br />
passed by the National Assembly.<br />
The bill was passed <strong>in</strong> December 2004, <strong>and</strong> became a law <strong>in</strong> January<br />
2005. However, as the above-quoted statistics <strong>in</strong>dicate, there was no letup<br />
<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>cidents <strong>of</strong> ‘honour’ kill<strong>in</strong>gs dur<strong>in</strong>g the follow<strong>in</strong>g years. S<strong>in</strong>ce,<br />
we were aware <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> serious loopholes <strong>in</strong> the law, it did not<br />
come as a surprise. But, there could have been other factors, e.g. what<br />
does our case law say about ‘honour’ kill<strong>in</strong>gs’; how were the law or the<br />
relevant provisions <strong>in</strong> the PPC received by the police, judiciary <strong>and</strong> legal<br />
community <strong>and</strong>; what were community perceptions towards the <strong>of</strong>fence<br />
<strong>and</strong> any legal remedy to it. These were broad questions. Therefore, it was<br />
felt that a pilot study was required to analyze ground situation to ascerta<strong>in</strong><br />
the level <strong>of</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g on the new law by different stakeholders <strong>and</strong><br />
2