25.01.2015 Views

Etude et impact du bruit de fond corrélé pour la mesure de l'angle ...

Etude et impact du bruit de fond corrélé pour la mesure de l'angle ...

Etude et impact du bruit de fond corrélé pour la mesure de l'angle ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

74 3. The Double Chooz experiment<br />

tel-00821629, version 1 - 11 May 2013<br />

as it goes through the bottom part of the IV. In addition, the muon is also<br />

tagged by the <strong>la</strong>rge <strong>de</strong>position in the ID <strong>du</strong>e to the long track. A cut of<br />

E ID = 30 MeV is s<strong>et</strong>. This means that a sneaking muon is tagged via its<br />

track-length in the scintil<strong>la</strong>tor ( x>15 cm for E = 30 MeV) or via its<br />

Michel electron ( E>30 MeV, which covers ⇠ 50% of the Michel electron<br />

energy spectrum).<br />

Dedicated algorithms has been <strong>de</strong>veloped using the ID and the IV to reconstruct<br />

the tracks of such muons. The ID algorithm relies on the Cherenkovlike<br />

light cone emitted by the muons crossing the scintil<strong>la</strong>tor. The IV algorithm<br />

is based on a log-likelihood minimisation using the photon arrival<br />

time patterns d<strong>et</strong>ermined from MC simu<strong>la</strong>tions. The spatial information<br />

provi<strong>de</strong>d by the OV is also inclu<strong>de</strong>d in the track reconstruction.<br />

The <strong>la</strong>teral resolution of the reconstructed track is d<strong>et</strong>ermined at the d<strong>et</strong>ector<br />

center, using MC simu<strong>la</strong>tions, to be about 35 cm for the ID and 60 cm<br />

for the IV.<br />

3.8.4 Energy reconstruction<br />

The mixing param<strong>et</strong>er ✓ 13 is inferred by the comparison b<strong>et</strong>ween the ¯⌫ e energy<br />

spectrum obtained with the FD and the expected spectrum from MC<br />

simu<strong>la</strong>tions. Uncorrected di↵erences b<strong>et</strong>ween the energy spectra would affect<br />

the measured of ✓ 13 . The energy reconstruction is thus an important<br />

steps towards the comparison of energy spectra.<br />

The energy scale is <strong>de</strong>fined by the visible energy, E vis , measured in MeV<br />

units, which provi<strong>de</strong>s the absolute calorim<strong>et</strong>ric estimation of the energy <strong>de</strong>posited<br />

per each trigger. The visible energy is obtained from the charge<br />

reconstructed on each ID PMTs. The charge is converted into photo electrons<br />

(PE) and multiplied by factors correcting for d<strong>et</strong>ector uniformity and<br />

stability and finally converted in MeV:<br />

E vis = PE m ⇥ f m uniformity ⇥ f m stability ⇥ f m MeV . (3.14)<br />

where m refers to data or MC. The PE conversion is obtained from the sum<br />

of the charge per channel as:<br />

PE =⌃ i PE i =⌃ i q i ⇥ gain i (q i ) (3.15)<br />

The gain i (qi) is extracted for each channel from the PE distribution obtained<br />

<strong>du</strong>ring IDLI runs [18]. It corrects the non-linearity of the charge<br />

reconstruction around the SPE charge equivalent, as shown in Fig. 3.24.<br />

Such curve is measured per each power-cycle period and per channel.<br />

The d<strong>et</strong>ector response is intrinsically non-uniform across the d<strong>et</strong>ector volume<br />

<strong>du</strong>e to several e↵ects of the optical mo<strong>de</strong>l. Response map of the H-capture<br />

gamma line is then used to characterise the response variations across the<br />

full volume in the ID [88]. The response uniformity factor, f uniformity of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!