25.01.2015 Views

Etude et impact du bruit de fond corrélé pour la mesure de l'angle ...

Etude et impact du bruit de fond corrélé pour la mesure de l'angle ...

Etude et impact du bruit de fond corrélé pour la mesure de l'angle ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.5 Data analysis summary 99<br />

4.4.3 Spill-in/out<br />

tel-00821629, version 1 - 11 May 2013<br />

Neutrons are captured on Gd once their energy become thermal. The thermalization<br />

process happen through multiple e<strong>la</strong>stic scattering b<strong>et</strong>ween the<br />

neutron and the nuclei of the atoms of the scintil<strong>la</strong>tor, the characteristic<br />

time is of about 30 µs. During the thermalisation process, the neutron is<br />

di↵used in the scintil<strong>la</strong>tor. A neutron from ¯⌫ e IBD in the targ<strong>et</strong> could reach<br />

the -catcher volume and be captured on H. On the other hand, the neutrino<br />

could interact in the -catcher and the neutron be captured on Gd in<br />

the targ<strong>et</strong> volume. Such e↵ects are called spill-out and spill-in respectively.<br />

Such e↵ects have to be taken into account since they do not compensate<br />

precisely, resulting in a n<strong>et</strong> spill-in current which <strong>impact</strong>s on the normalisation<br />

of the MC simu<strong>la</strong>tion [74].<br />

Due to the presence of Gd in the targ<strong>et</strong> liquid, the mean live time of a<br />

neutron in the targ<strong>et</strong> volume is shorter (⌧ Gd ⇠ 30 µs) than the one in the<br />

-catcher (⌧ H ⇠ 100 µs). So the spill-in probability is expected to be <strong>la</strong>rger<br />

than the spill-out. Thespill-in/out e↵ect is studied with ¯⌫ e MC sample and<br />

the systematics e↵ect <strong>du</strong>e to the MC mo<strong>de</strong>l (⇠ 0.22 %), the concentration of<br />

Gd in the targ<strong>et</strong> (⇠ 0.10 wt. %) and the concentration of H in the -catcher<br />

(negligible e↵ect) are taken into account. Spill-in/out correction is found to<br />

be 1.35 ± 0.29(syst) ± 0.04(stat) % [62].<br />

4.5 Data analysis summary<br />

Tab. 4.2 report a summary of all the necessary input param<strong>et</strong>ers for the<br />

measurement of ✓ 13 . The param<strong>et</strong>ers obtained for the first DC publication<br />

[19] are also reported for comparison. Beyond the increased statistics <strong>du</strong>e<br />

to the longer exposure time (about a factor 2), improvements on the MC<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>lling of the low energy neutron physics, energy scale calibration, cosmogenic<br />

background analysis and corre<strong>la</strong>ted background analysis allow to<br />

<strong>de</strong>crease the total systematic uncertainty from ⇠ 3.7 %to⇠ 1.8 %.<br />

4.6 Final fit and measurement of ✓ 13<br />

The measurement of ✓ 13 is performed by a combined fit to the ¯⌫ e rate and<br />

spectral shape, to explicit account the spectral distortion in<strong>du</strong>ced by the<br />

oscil<strong>la</strong>tion, i.e. energy <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce of the oscil<strong>la</strong>tion probability.<br />

The observed ¯⌫ e spectral shape is compared to the expected one, as obtained<br />

by the simu<strong>la</strong>tion of the reactor ¯⌫ e flux, and the spectral shape obtained from<br />

background studies. The energy interval b<strong>et</strong>ween 0.7 MeV and 12.2 MeV<br />

has been divi<strong>de</strong>d in 18 non-constant bin to ensure enough statistics per bin.<br />

The expected number of signal and background events is obtained for each

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!