May 23, 2005 - Riverside County Flood Control

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources the City cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). A “No Impact” answer does not require a source listing if it is clearly apparent by a reasonable person that the project does not affect a particular issue (e.g. the construction of infrastructure will not impact parking capacity). The source reference in the parentheses would be “not applicable” or (N/A). Potentially Potentially Less than Significant Significant Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Unless Mitigated Impact Impact Would the proposal: Insufficient parking capacity (N/A) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if an effect is significant or potentially significant, or if the Planning Department staff lacks information to make a finding of insignificance. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less than Significant Impact.” The Planning Department must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section 17, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section 18 at the end of the checklist. 6) A reference list of information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances) has been established. The source list is attached to the back of the checklist and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the impact assessment discussion. See sample question below. Potentially Potentially Less than Significant Significant Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Unless Mitigated Impact Impact Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: Landslides or mudslides 3
V. IMPACT ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST REFERENCES – KEY INFORMATION SOURCE 1. General Plan Land Use & Planning: Public Services: Utilities and Service Systems: Population & Housing: Transportation/Circulation: Water: Biological Resources: Cultural Resources: Recreation: Geophysical: Hazards: Noise: Air Quality: 2. Applicable Specific Plan 3. Zoning Ordinance 4. Subdivision Ordinance 5. Murrieta Municipal Code 6. Transportation Demand Management Ordinance 7. United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map Murrieta 7.5' Quad 8. Soil Survey Western <strong>Riverside</strong> Area California (1971) 9. City of Murrieta Department of Public Works Standard Plans 10. Congestion Management Plan (RCTC) 11. Growth Management Plan (WRCOG) 12. Master Development Plan 13. Other: 4
Page 1 and 2: PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT CITY OF MURRIET
Page 3 and 4: City of Murrieta SWMP 8.0 INDUSTRIA
Page 5 and 6: City of Murrieta SWMP 2.0 I NTRODUC
Page 7 and 8: City of Murrieta SWMP 3.0 P ROGRAM
Page 9 and 10: City of Murrieta SWMP Table 3-1. SW
Page 11 and 12: City of Murrieta SWMP Program Eleme
Page 13 and 14: City of Murrieta SWMP 3.4 LEGAL AUT
Page 15 and 16: City of Murrieta SWMP 4.0 E LIMINAT
Page 17 and 18: City of Murrieta SWMP 5.0 MUNICIPAL
Page 19 and 20: 5.4 FIRE BMPS City of Murrieta SWMP
Page 21 and 22: 6.3 CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCE
Page 23 and 24: City of Murrieta SWMP 7.0 P RIVATE
Page 25 and 26: City of Murrieta SWMP List or Envir
Page 27 and 28: City of Murrieta SWMP 9.3 ENFORCEME
Page 29 and 30: City of Murrieta SWMP 11.0 MONITORI
Page 31 and 32: City of Murrieta SWMP 12.0 P ROGRAM
Page 33 and 34: APPENDIX B Inventory of Municipal F
Page 35 and 36: Inventory of City of Murrieta Munic
Page 37 and 38: Name Address / Location Description
Page 39 and 40: Name Address / Location Description
Page 41 and 42: APPENDIX D Initial Study Checklist
Page 43: III. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIA
Page 47 and 48: Potentially Potentially Less than S
Page 53 and 54: APPENDIX E Construction Site Invent
Page 55 and 56: Grading Permits -- May 1, 2005 Perm
Page 63 and 64: Building Permits -- May 1, 2005 Per
Page 65 and 66: Building Permits -- May 1, 2005 B00
Page 95 and 96:
Building Permits -- May 1, 2005 B00
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Encroachment Permits -- May 1, 2005
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
NPDES Construction Activity Complia
Page 138 and 139:
APPENDIX G Industrial and Commercia
Page 140 and 141:
Firm Name Firm Address Firm City, S
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212:
show all

May 23, 2005 - Riverside County Flood Control

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?