May 23, 2005 - Riverside County Flood Control

Potentially Potentially Less than
Significant Significant Significant No
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Unless Mitigated Impact Impact
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would
the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans (1, 15)
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful
and inefficient manner (1, 15)
Potentially Potentially Less than
Significant Significant Significant No
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Unless Mitigated Impact Impact
9. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources (1t, 13)
b) Disturb archaeological resources
(1u, 13)
c) Affect historical resources (1u, 13)
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural
values (1, 13)
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses
within the potential impact area (1, 13)
Potentially Potentially Less than
Significant Significant Significant No
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Unless Mitigated Impact Impact
10. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities (1,
2, 13)
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities
(1, 2, 13)
Potentially Potentially Less than
Significant Significant Significant No
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Unless Mitigated Impact Impact
11. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway
(1, 2, 13)
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect
(1, 2, 13)
c) Create light or glare (1, 2, 13)
8