31.01.2015 Views

May 23, 2005 - Riverside County Flood Control

May 23, 2005 - Riverside County Flood Control

May 23, 2005 - Riverside County Flood Control

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Potentially Potentially Less than<br />

Significant Significant Significant No<br />

Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Unless Mitigated Impact Impact<br />

3. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the<br />

proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial<br />

alterations to the following utilities:<br />

a) Power or natural gas (1, 2, 13, 17)<br />

b) Communication systems (1, 2, 13, 15)<br />

c) Sewer or septic tanks (1, 2, 13, 15)<br />

d) Solid waste and disposal (1, 13, 15)<br />

e) Local or regional water treatment or<br />

distribution facilities (1, 13, 15)<br />

f) Storm water drainage (1, 13, 15)<br />

Potentially Potentially Less than<br />

Significant Significant Significant No<br />

Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Unless Mitigated Impact Impact<br />

4. POPULATION & HOUSING. Would the proposal:<br />

a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local<br />

population projections (1, 13, 15)<br />

b) Induce substantial growth in an area either<br />

directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an<br />

undeveloped area or extension of major<br />

infrastructure) (1, 13, 14, 15)<br />

c) Displace existing housing, especially<br />

affordable housing (1, 13, 14, 15)<br />

Potentially Potentially Less than<br />

Significant Significant Significant No<br />

Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Unless Mitigated Impact Impact<br />

5. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the<br />

proposal result in:<br />

a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion<br />

(1, 2, 13)<br />

b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.<br />

sharp curves or dangerous intersections),<br />

incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment) or<br />

barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists (1, 2,<br />

9, 13, 14)<br />

c) Inadequacy emergency access or access to<br />

nearby uses (1, 2, 9, 13, 14)<br />

d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or<br />

off-site (1, 2, 13)<br />

e) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting<br />

alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,<br />

bicycle racks) (1, 2, 12, 13)<br />

f) Air or rail traffic impacts (1, 2, 12, 13)<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!