May 23, 2005 - Riverside County Flood Control

VI.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST & DISCUSSION
A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources cited in the parentheses following each question.
Potentially Potentially Less than
Significant Significant Significant No
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Unless Mitigated Impact Impact
1. LAND USE & PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or
zoning (1a, 1n, 2, 13, 14)
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdictions
over the project (1, 2, 13, 14)
c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (1,
13, 14)
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of
an established community (including a
low-income or minority community) (1, 2, 13,
14)
e) Be compatible with existing land use in the
vicinity (1,2, 13, 14)
Potentially Potentially Less than
Significant Significant Significant No
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Unless Mitigated Impact Impact
2. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection (1, 2, 13, 14, 15)
b) Police protection (1, 2, 13, 14, 15)
c) Schools (1, 2, 13, 14, 15)
d) Parks or other recreational facilities (1, 2, 13,
14, 15)
e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads (1, 2, 13, 14, 15)
f) Other governmental services (1, 2, 15)
5