01.02.2015 Views

The Evaluation of 'Behavioural Additionality' - IWT

The Evaluation of 'Behavioural Additionality' - IWT

The Evaluation of 'Behavioural Additionality' - IWT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX > Additionality Questionnaire<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

I will apply for <strong>IWT</strong>-support for the most risky project o o o o o<br />

I will apply for <strong>IWT</strong>-support for the most innovative project o o o o o<br />

I will apply for <strong>IWT</strong>-support for the project which is closest<br />

to the core <strong>of</strong> my activities o o o o o<br />

I will apply for <strong>IWT</strong>-support for projects which are larger than<br />

a certain critical size o o o o o<br />

I will apply for <strong>IWT</strong>-support for the project that has the most<br />

fundamental research character o o o o o<br />

I will always apply for <strong>IWT</strong>-support o o o o o<br />

other criteria you use: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

5. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND ORGANISATION<br />

1. Please indicate to which degree the various levels <strong>of</strong> the company are normally involved in setting the<br />

following aspects <strong>of</strong> the R&D strategy.<br />

0 = no involvement, 1 =limited involvement, 2 = important involvement, 3 = very important involvement<br />

N.A. Operational and Executive and<br />

functional<br />

strategic<br />

(researcher,<br />

(CEO, CFO, CMO,<br />

R&D manager…) Board, corporate HQ )<br />

Setting overall level <strong>of</strong> R&D budget for company 0 – 1 – 2 – 3 0 – 1 – 2 – 3<br />

Setting technology priorities/platforms 0 – 1 – 2 – 3 0 – 1 – 2 – 3<br />

Selecting individual R&D projects 0 – 1 – 2 – 3 0 – 1 – 2 – 3<br />

Deciding R&D management processes 0 – 1 – 2 – 3 0 – 1 – 2 – 3<br />

Decision on external R&D collaboration 0 – 1 – 2 – 3 0 – 1 – 2 – 3<br />

2. Please indicate to which degree the various levels <strong>of</strong> the company were involved in:<br />

0 = no involvement, 1 = limited involvement, 2 = important involvement, 3 = very important involvement<br />

Operational and Executive and<br />

functional<br />

strategic<br />

Setting the project budget 0 – 1 – 2 – 3 0 – 1 – 2 – 3<br />

Identifying the opportunity for public funding 0 – 1 – 2 – 3 0 – 1 – 2 – 3<br />

Deciding to apply for funding 0 – 1 – 2 – 3 0 – 1 – 2 – 3<br />

Preparing the application 0 – 1 – 2 – 3 0 – 1 – 2 – 3<br />

negotiation with <strong>IWT</strong> 0 – 1 – 2 – 3 0 – 1 – 2 – 3<br />

3. Please consider your contacts with the <strong>IWT</strong> in terms <strong>of</strong> the following stages <strong>of</strong> the project:<br />

pre-contract phase (initial contact and negotiation with agency during proposal writing, …)<br />

project phase (Monitoring and reporting while research proceeded as well as final reporting, …)<br />

post project phase (support with development or marketing, …)<br />

How did the contact with <strong>IWT</strong> influence your project Please specify.<br />

0 = no influence, 1 = limited influence, 2 = important influence, 3 = very important influence<br />

<strong>IWT</strong>-grant phase Influence Specification<br />

Pre-contract phase 0 – 1 – 2 – 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

Project phase 0 – 1 – 2 – 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

Post project phase 0 – 1 – 2 – 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!