01.02.2015 Views

The Evaluation of 'Behavioural Additionality' - IWT

The Evaluation of 'Behavioural Additionality' - IWT

The Evaluation of 'Behavioural Additionality' - IWT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 3 > Conceptual and Empirical Challenges <strong>of</strong> Evaluating the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

Innovation Policies with ‘Behavioural Additionality’ .<br />

<strong>IWT</strong>-STUDIES > >> 48<br />

In this work international exchange <strong>of</strong> experience<br />

with other research groups or agencies<br />

is very valuable. To extend the empirical<br />

base for common work a similar data collection<br />

(similar survey questions) in different<br />

countries is very useful.<br />

International comparative work<br />

Besides exchange <strong>of</strong> best practice in methodologies<br />

and the construction <strong>of</strong> a common<br />

empirical reference base, international comparative<br />

work is very important to assess the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> different institutional set-ups in the<br />

organisation <strong>of</strong> innovation stimulation.<br />

Understanding the qualitative particularities<br />

that can explain certain strengths and weaknesses,<br />

in connection with quantitative<br />

results, is a very important way <strong>of</strong> policy<br />

learning.<br />

In this process an international community<br />

<strong>of</strong> practice is formed that can be an asset in<br />

actual national evaluation exercises. A natural<br />

extension <strong>of</strong> this cooperation could be<br />

the set-up <strong>of</strong> an international peer-review<br />

system <strong>of</strong> evaluators that is another complementary<br />

element in the evaluation set-up.<br />

Internalisation in existing evaluation<br />

procedures<br />

<strong>The</strong> organisation <strong>of</strong> an ex-post evaluation is<br />

a cumbersome and costly exercise. It is<br />

important to make sure that the results are<br />

useful and used. <strong>The</strong> mandate for this kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> exercise coming from the policy makers is<br />

vital. <strong>The</strong> preparation and implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the evaluation has to involve the management<br />

and the advisors <strong>of</strong> <strong>IWT</strong>. <strong>The</strong>y are<br />

also an important source <strong>of</strong> information.<br />

But the internalisation <strong>of</strong> this evaluation will<br />

have two directions. First, enhance the<br />

instruments and the organisation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

interaction process with the ‘clients’ in a<br />

more system-aware sense. Second, include<br />

new indicators for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> behavioural<br />

additionality as part <strong>of</strong> the existing<br />

evaluation procedures. This material will<br />

feed-in in the evaluation methods above<br />

described and increase the learning capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>IWT</strong> and the policy makers.<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!