Jasper-Global-Tyranny-Step-By-Step-The-United-Nations-and-the ...

CHAPTER 5
CHAPTER 5 - The Drive for World Government
[T]here is going to be no steady progress in civilization or self-government among the
more backward peoples until some kind of international system is created which will put
an end to the diplomatic struggles incident to the attempt of every nation to make itself
secure... The real problem today is that of world government.1
— Philip Kerr, Foreign Affairs, December 1922
There is no indication that American public opinion, for example, would approve the
establishment of a super state, or permit American membership in it. In other words, time
— a long time — will be needed before world government is politically feasible.... [T]his
time element might seemingly be shortened so far as American opinion is concerned by an
active propaganda campaign in this country....2
— Allen W. Dulles (CFR) and Beatrice Pitney Lamb, Foreign Policy Association, 1946
[T]here is no longer a question of whether or not there will be world government by the
year 2000. As I see it, the questions we should be addressing to ourselves are: how it will
come into being — by cataclysm, drift, more or less rational design — and whether it will
be totalitarian, benignly elitist, or participatory (the probabilities being in that order.)3
— Saul H. Mendlovitz, director World Order Models Project, 1975
A major obstacle to alerting Americans about plans to cancel our national sovereignty and personal
freedoms and to submerge the United States in a world government is the dissembling double-talk and
outright lying routinely employed by the world government advocates. While groups like Planetary
Citizens, the World Federalist Association, the Association of World Citizens, the Committee to Frame a
World Constitution, the World Constitution and Parliament Association, the World Association for
World Federation, etc. have usually flown their world government flags openly, the Council on Foreign
Relations and other Establishment groups seeking world government prefer to obfuscate their aims with
terms like "collective security," "the rule of law," "world law," "global institutions," "interdependence,"
and "world order."
As we have already shown and will further demonstrate, the CFR and its influential members are also on
record favoring and promoting world government. However, most of these public CFR utterances have
appeared in publications and speeches intended for a select, sympathetic audience where the new world
order adepts can "unblushingly" (in the words of Lincoln Bloomfield) contemplate and discuss "world
government."4
file:///D|/DESTROY_THE_NWO(2.0)/Ebooks%20in%20progress/chapter_05.html (1 of 14)6/19/2004 10:29:52 PM