Jasper-Global-Tyranny-Step-By-Step-The-United-Nations-and-the ...

Bankrolling Tyranny, Socialism
There is scarcely a tyrant anywhere in the world who hasn’t benefited handsomely from UN handouts.
Graham Hancock lists many examples, including Mobutu Sese Seku of Zaire and Jean-Claude "Baby
Doc" Duvalier of Haiti.
According to the 1987 World Bank Atlas, Zaire was ranked as the eighth poorest country in the world.24
The main reason this is so is dictator Mobutu, whose brutal police state discourages private investment
and entrepreneurial activity. Mobutu himself, however, has become one of the richest men in the world,
with an estimated personal net worth of over $3 billion, which he has stolen from his own people and
the taxpayers of the West.25
Since launching this world-class grand larceny spree in 1965, the "Butcher of Zaire" has been showered
with UN aid and IMF loans. In the 1986-87 period alone, Mobutu was the recipient of $570 million in
new IMF loans, despite having defaulted on previous loans.
Next to Mobutu, Haiti’s Duvaliers were pikers but still managed to expropriate tens of millions of
dollars of public funds for their personal use while the vast majority of their subjects lived in abject
poverty. All the while, they were developing a horrible record on human rights that matched the
performance of some of the world’s more infamous despots. Graham Hancock noted:
Interestingly enough, however, Haiti was a major recipient of foreign aid throughout the
Duvalier era — with the United States, Canada, West Germany and France prominent
amongst the bilateral donors and with the World Bank, FAO, WHO, UNDP, and UNICEF
the most notable of the multilaterals. With all these "assisters" on the scene, a question has
to be asked: Did the ruin of the Haitian poor occur in spite of foreign aid, or because of it
26 [Emphasis in original]
Indeed, the same question has to be asked regarding the ruin of scores of countries. The answer is not
pleasant. Moreover, when one sees in this ruination a recurring pattern of foreign aid-caused calamities
and crises, always leading to more loss of freedom and ever greater concentration of power in
government, and when one observes the same individuals again and again implementing the same
disastrous policies with the same tragic results in one country after another and with these same
individuals and institutions benefiting from the misery they are inflicting, then a whole host of questions
beg to be asked. The foremost of which is: Is it possible that the UN foreign aid officials and the bankers
who have been involved in these repeated and colossal catastrophes are so incompetent and incapable of
learning from their numerous mistakes that they continue to make the same blunders out of sheer
ignorance
To believe that simple incompetence is responsible for these disasters is to stretch credulity beyond all
reason. These are some of the brightest men in the world, with all the advantages of the best education
money can buy. They have armies of advisors and technicians — "the best and the brightest" — to plot
and plan each move they make. They have had, additionally, the benefit of the warnings of a host of
independent expert analysts, from all political and ideological stripes, who have repeatedly condemned
these programs for the fraudulent schemes they are.
One individual who has researched this issue very extensively over many years and who has argued very
trenchantly against multilateral and bilateral "aid" programs is British economist Peter T. Bauer. After
two decades of critical examination of Third World economies, Lord Bauer, one of the world’s most
distinguished development economists, concluded: