Jasper-Global-Tyranny-Step-By-Step-The-United-Nations-and-the ...

policies adopted to promote them have been abolished."14 Unfortunately, our elected leaders have
continued along the course set by communists, socialists, and globalist Insiders decades ago.
Again, we turn to Hazlitt:
Yet the supreme irony is that the Bretton Woods institutions that have failed so completely
in their announced purpose, and led to only monetary chaos instead, are still there, still
operating, still draining the countries with lower inflations to subsidize the higher inflation
of others.15
In fact, the internationalist Insiders have stepped up the pace of these suicidal policies. In his Spring
1988 Foreign Affairs article entitled "The Case for Practical Internationalism," CFR strategist Richard
N. Gardner stated bluntly:
But most of all, the world needs to enlarge the flows of private and official capital to
developing countries in order to stimulate an adequate level of global growth. A neardoubling
of World Bank capital and International Monetary Fund quotas should be a high
priority for American leadership.... [Emphasis added]
A World Central Bank
Even worse, the one-worlders are working to expand their scheme in order eventually to achieve
complete global economic control by transforming the International Monetary Fund and World Bank
combine into a central Federal Reserve system for the planet. One of the first in-depth presentations of
this plan to CFR membership came in 1981 with the publication of Collective Management: The Reform
of Global Economic Organizations. Written by Miriam Camps (CFR) in collaboration with Catherine
Gwin (CFR), it was the 21st volume in the Council’s 1980s Project series.
Collective Management’s proposals for "restructuring" United Nations institutions included designing a
new global trade organization to supersede the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), merging several United Nations aid
programs in order to create in their places a new "United Nations Basic Support Program," and taking
additional steps that would aid in "the continuing evolution of the IMF in the direction of a world central
bank."16
Expanding further on this topic in the Fall 1984 edition of Foreign Affairs, Harvard University Professor
Richard N. Cooper (CFR, TC) proposed "A Monetary System for the Future" that would mean the end
of America as we know it. He wrote:
A new Bretton Woods conference is wholly premature. But it is not premature to begin
thinking about how we would like international monetary arrangements to evolve in the
remainder of this century. With this in mind, I suggest a radical alternative scheme for the
next century: the creation of a common currency for all of the industrial democracies, with
a common monetary policy and a joint Bank of Issue to determine that monetary policy.
[Emphasis in original]
"The currency of the Bank of Issue could be practically anything," the Harvard economist continued. "...
The key point is that monetary control — the issuance of currency and of reserve credit — would be in
the hands of the new Bank of Issue, not in the hands of any national government...." (Emphasis added)
The problem, however, is that "a single currency is possible only if there is in effect a single monetary