Jasper-Global-Tyranny-Step-By-Step-The-United-Nations-and-the ...
Jasper-Global-Tyranny-Step-By-Step-The-United-Nations-and-the ...
Jasper-Global-Tyranny-Step-By-Step-The-United-Nations-and-the ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Bruce Russett <strong>and</strong> James S. Sutterlin concluded: "It is worth emphasizing that nothing in <strong>the</strong> [UN]<br />
charter prohibits <strong>the</strong> Security Council from deploying peacekeeping forces without <strong>the</strong> consent of all <strong>the</strong><br />
parties, or from including troop contingents from <strong>the</strong> permanent members of <strong>the</strong> council in such forces<br />
where <strong>the</strong> need for deterrence arises." If this attitude prevails, UN eco-saviors can first declare your<br />
factory, your logging, ranching or farming practices, or even your use of an automobile a threat to <strong>the</strong><br />
environment, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n decide under authority derived from <strong>the</strong> new definition of "peacekeeping" to send<br />
in <strong>the</strong> blue (or green) helmeted troops to address <strong>the</strong> breach of "peace" with force.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Great Mutation<br />
Although <strong>the</strong> UN has not yet used any of this steadily building "peacekeeping" muscle for enforcement<br />
of environmental or social dicta, <strong>the</strong> precedent for uninvited intervention has already been established<br />
under <strong>the</strong> assumed authority of "peacekeeping." As Los Angeles Times columnist William Pfaff<br />
observed in his March 5, 1992 column appearing in <strong>the</strong> International Herald Tribune, <strong>the</strong> 1992 UN<br />
action in what was once Yugoslavia is a signal event, representing an overturning of national<br />
sovereignty. "Slowly, too slowly, <strong>the</strong> great mutation occurs," said Pfaff. "<strong>The</strong> principle of absolute<br />
national sovereignty is being overturned.... <strong>The</strong> civil war in Yugoslavia has rendered this service to us."<br />
Pfaff, a committed internationalist, applauded <strong>the</strong> UN's "uninvited international intervention into <strong>the</strong><br />
affairs of a state" which, until now, "has been held an unacceptable attack upon <strong>the</strong> principle of<br />
unlimited state sovereignty." He saw <strong>the</strong> intervention of <strong>the</strong> European Community <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> UN in<br />
Yugoslavia as a new model of collective action that has many o<strong>the</strong>r potential applications. "What <strong>the</strong>y<br />
have thus far done has been improvisation, but it is a start on something new," <strong>the</strong> Paris-based columnist<br />
noted approvingly. "We are now in a situation where improvisation <strong>and</strong> experiment are essential, in<br />
contrast to <strong>the</strong> big programmatic reforms of 1918 <strong>and</strong> 1945 - <strong>the</strong> League <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.N." <strong>The</strong><br />
"improvisation" Pfaff <strong>and</strong> his fellow globalists talk about is hardly spontaneous <strong>and</strong> is eminently<br />
predictable; it involves <strong>the</strong> expansion <strong>and</strong> concentration of <strong>the</strong> UN's political, economic, <strong>and</strong> military<br />
powers in response to global or regional or even local "crises."<br />
<strong>The</strong> excuse for UN "peacekeeping" action in a crisis involving civil war <strong>and</strong> ethnic fighting is <strong>the</strong><br />
supposed potential for <strong>the</strong> conflict to escalate to global dimensions if not checked by collective<br />
international force. "What may now be needed," said <strong>the</strong> New York Times in its March 6, 1992 editorial,<br />
"is a permanent force for rapid deployment in chaotic circumstances." <strong>The</strong> Times editorial continued:<br />
"One promising possibility is to make fuller use of <strong>the</strong> U.N. Charter. Article 43 already calls on<br />
members to make available 'armed forces, assistance <strong>and</strong> facilities' necessary to maintain international<br />
peace. To that end, <strong>the</strong> Charter established a Military Staff Committee...."<br />
But, lamented <strong>the</strong> Times, this UN committee has never worked as intended, because "American armed<br />
forces have traditionally resisted [it] as a threat to comm<strong>and</strong> autonomy." Again, <strong>the</strong> far greater threat to<br />
national security <strong>and</strong> sovereignty was ignored.<br />
"But in a transformed world," continued <strong>the</strong> Times editorial, "it makes sense to consider direct<br />
contributions of personnel <strong>and</strong> equipment to a rapid deployment force under real multinational control."<br />
Going still fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> article proposed that <strong>the</strong> UN military force be exp<strong>and</strong>ed with funds taken from<br />
<strong>the</strong> U.S. defense budget instead of from its foreign aid budget. "That won't be easy," <strong>the</strong> Times . "But<br />
what a chance for President Bush to take <strong>the</strong> lead in giving real meaning to his still hazy vision of a New<br />
World Order."<br />
A Long-Established Policy