17.02.2015 Views

Revealing the Mechanism of HSP104 Transcription Initiation in the ...

Revealing the Mechanism of HSP104 Transcription Initiation in the ...

Revealing the Mechanism of HSP104 Transcription Initiation in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 4. Stra<strong>in</strong>s required for positive regulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>HSP104</strong>.<br />

β-Gal activity (% <strong>of</strong> WT) β-Gal activity (% <strong>of</strong> WT) β-Gal activity (% <strong>of</strong> WT)<br />

Stra<strong>in</strong> C<strong>of</strong>atctor complex Un<strong>in</strong>duced Induced Un<strong>in</strong>duced Induced Un<strong>in</strong>duced Induced<br />

<strong>HSP104</strong> <strong>HSP104</strong> STRE-LacZ STRE-LacZ HSE-LacZ HSE-LacZ<br />

bdf1∆ TFIID 225 135 742 122 46 67<br />

elp3∆ HAT 116 185 227 140 156 111<br />

chd1∆ Homodimer 74 156 143 152 149 84<br />

caf1∆ CCR4-NOT 227 60 237 87 15 13<br />

dhh1∆ CCR4-NOT 319 67 873 132 17 7<br />

srb9∆<br />

SRB/MED,CCR4-<br />

NOT<br />

150 59 723 104 52 38<br />

med1∆ SRB/MED 154 107 715 229 42 38<br />

med9∆ SRB/MED 179 93 1550 484 29 32<br />

nut1∆ SRB/MED 135 68 580 249 101 78<br />

β-Gal activity (% <strong>of</strong> WT) β-Gal activity (% <strong>of</strong> WT) β-Gal activity (% <strong>of</strong> WT)<br />

Stra<strong>in</strong> C<strong>of</strong>atctor complex Un<strong>in</strong>duced Induced Un<strong>in</strong>duced Induced Un<strong>in</strong>duced Induced<br />

<strong>HSP104</strong> <strong>HSP104</strong> STRE-LacZ STRE-LacZ HSE-LacZ HSE-LacZ<br />

gcn5∆ ADA,SAGA 23 69 99 17 13 20<br />

spt7∆ SAGA 58 16 325 37 6 8<br />

sas3∆ NuA3 3 7 0 2 7 6<br />

hos2∆ HDAC 36 64 33 55 35 26<br />

sir2∆ HDAC 38 71 29 77 38 46<br />

hst1∆ HDAC 36 55 80 105 72 56<br />

snf6∆ SWI/SNF 13 50 0 0 10 23<br />

srb10∆<br />

SRB/MED,CCR4-<br />

NOT<br />

72 15 469 41 13 6<br />

srb2∆ SRB/MED 33 110 154 69 32 94<br />

srb5∆ SRB/MED 10 23 78 23 12 29<br />

srb8∆ SRB/MED 60 28 614 90 69 28<br />

dst1∆ TFIIS 25 36 182 111 58 40<br />

rpb4∆ RNA PolII core 2 0.4 17 0.6 1 0.4<br />

cdc73∆ Paf1 complex 11 20 11 17 4 12<br />

leo1∆ Paf1 complex 21 29 37 51 34 28<br />

hpr1∆ Paf1,THO/TREX 0.1 1 0 1.5 0 0.1<br />

mft1∆ THO/TREX 4 3 5 0.1 0.4 0.5<br />

Table 5. Stra<strong>in</strong>s which <strong>in</strong>duced an up-regulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>HSP104</strong> (i.e. downregulate<br />

<strong>HSP104</strong>).<br />

In order to confirm that <strong>the</strong> decreased or <strong>in</strong>creased reporter activities measured<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mutants reflect <strong>in</strong>deed defects <strong>in</strong> expression <strong>of</strong> endogenous <strong>HSP104</strong>, we<br />

performed S1 analysis to detect endogenous mRNA levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>HSP104</strong>. We first<br />

measured RNA levels <strong>in</strong> stra<strong>in</strong>s which demonstrated a decrease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> β-galactosidase<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> -334LacZ. Most stra<strong>in</strong>s listed <strong>in</strong> Table 4 <strong>in</strong>deed had lower RNA levels<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!