17.02.2015 Views

The Dalits of Nepal and a New Constitution - ConstitutionNet

The Dalits of Nepal and a New Constitution - ConstitutionNet

The Dalits of Nepal and a New Constitution - ConstitutionNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Dalits</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nepal</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

a <strong>New</strong> <strong>Constitution</strong><br />

5<br />

Information <strong>and</strong> communications<br />

State <strong>and</strong> private media are urged to disseminate<br />

programmes on Dalit issues, including celebrating their<br />

contributions <strong>and</strong> achievements in public <strong>and</strong> private life.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y “should accept the responsibility to promote equality<br />

<strong>and</strong> the abolition <strong>of</strong> all sorts <strong>of</strong> caste <strong>and</strong> gender<br />

discrimination”.<br />

Once the Charter was adopted, UNDP was asked to advise<br />

on how its dem<strong>and</strong>s could be incorporated into the<br />

constitution. <strong>The</strong> following section, which deals with this<br />

issue, draws in part on the paper prepared by Jill Cottrell<br />

for this purpose, <strong>and</strong> discusses first the context <strong>and</strong> the<br />

procedure <strong>of</strong> constitution making <strong>and</strong> secondly, the<br />

substantive provisions <strong>of</strong> the constitution.<br />

IV From Charter to <strong>Constitution</strong><br />

Context <strong>and</strong> process<br />

<strong>The</strong> context in which the constitution is being made is very<br />

favourable to Dalit aspirations <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> 12 point<br />

agreement between the seven parties (22 November<br />

2005) was marked more by the commitment to democracy<br />

rather than to the rights <strong>of</strong> marginalised communities.<br />

However, the 2006 jana <strong>and</strong>olan, led by communities<br />

hitherto excluded from political <strong>and</strong> social power, established<br />

a progressive reform agenda with particular attention to<br />

the concerns <strong>and</strong> aspirations <strong>of</strong> minority, marginalised<br />

communities. This agenda was first reflected in the 8 point<br />

agreement between the seven parties <strong>and</strong> the CPN<br />

(Maoists) signed on 16 June 2006, when they agreed to<br />

“make a forward-looking restructuring <strong>of</strong> the state so as to<br />

resolve the class based racial, regional <strong>and</strong> gender based<br />

problems through the election <strong>of</strong> the constituent assembly”. 4<br />

In an agreement on 8 November 2006 between the high<br />

level leaders <strong>of</strong> the parties, a slightly more elaborate form<br />

<strong>of</strong> this commitment was agreed between these sides: “In<br />

order to end class, ethnicity, lingual, gender, cultural, religious<br />

<strong>and</strong> regional discriminations <strong>and</strong> also to end the centralised<br />

<strong>and</strong> unitary structure <strong>of</strong> the state it shall be restructured<br />

into an inclusive, democratic <strong>and</strong> progressive state” (Point<br />

10). This was exp<strong>and</strong>ed in Article 3.5 <strong>of</strong> the Comprehensive<br />

Peace Accord (CAP) by identifying groups or communities,<br />

including <strong>Dalits</strong>, against whom discrimination would be<br />

ended. <strong>The</strong> CPA also committed the parties to socioeconomic<br />

rights: to food, health, education, <strong>and</strong> private<br />

property (Article 7.5)—<strong>of</strong> particular relevant to <strong>Dalits</strong> due<br />

to pervasive poverty. <strong>The</strong>re thus seems to be very broad<br />

commitment to the aspirations <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Dalits</strong> <strong>and</strong> other<br />

marginalised communities not only among a large<br />

proportion but also the major political parties (<strong>and</strong> is already<br />

reflected, as shown later, in the Interim <strong>Constitution</strong> (IC)).<br />

<strong>The</strong> process <strong>of</strong> making the constitution is also favourable.<br />

<strong>The</strong> task is given to the Constituent Assembly (CA).<br />

Women, janjatis, <strong>Dalits</strong> <strong>and</strong> Madhesis are represented in<br />

greater number than ever before. <strong>The</strong>y are also more<br />

conscious <strong>of</strong> their rights than before <strong>and</strong> most <strong>of</strong> them<br />

are determined to ensure a constitution which would<br />

protect their rights. Decisions <strong>of</strong> the CA are to be made<br />

through consensus (failing which by a two-thirds vote),<br />

which means that if <strong>Dalits</strong> <strong>and</strong> other marginalised<br />

communities are united, it would be hard to pass a<br />

constitution which does not protect their vital interests.<br />

It cannot <strong>of</strong> course be assumed that <strong>Dalits</strong> will have their<br />

way in the Constituent Assembly. Some <strong>of</strong> their dem<strong>and</strong>s,<br />

particularly affirmative action <strong>and</strong> reservations, are likely<br />

to be resented by the more privileged (<strong>and</strong> influential)<br />

communities <strong>and</strong> their representatives. <strong>Dalits</strong> are a<br />

relatively small minority in the CA, <strong>and</strong> their own spatial<br />

distribution (<strong>and</strong> internal divisions) makes it difficult to<br />

develop <strong>and</strong> present a common position. <strong>Dalits</strong> <strong>and</strong> other<br />

minorities have been made to enter the CA only on the<br />

tickets <strong>of</strong> national parties, dominated by traditional ruling<br />

elites. Under the IC rule, they are subject to party<br />

discipline <strong>and</strong> liable to be removed from the party <strong>and</strong><br />

the CA by the leader <strong>of</strong> the party, although the exact<br />

powers <strong>of</strong> the party are unclear (Art. 67(d). At the very<br />

least, traditional party control may also make it difficult<br />

for <strong>Dalits</strong> to develop a common st<strong>and</strong> or co-ordinate<br />

their strategies. But in practice there would be little reason<br />

for party leaders to oppose such co-ordination, for the<br />

Dalit agenda as expressed in the Charter is perfectly<br />

compatible with the commitments <strong>of</strong> all the parties to<br />

inclusion <strong>and</strong> social justice <strong>and</strong> their promises on specific<br />

measures.<br />

4<br />

<strong>The</strong> Maoist had <strong>of</strong> course made a commitment in the 1990s to advance the cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dalits</strong> <strong>and</strong> other disadvantaged communities when they announced their insurgency.<br />

Point 20 <strong>of</strong> their 40 points in 1996, stated that “All kinds <strong>of</strong> exploitation <strong>and</strong> prejudice based on caste should be ended” <strong>and</strong> point 21 that the “status <strong>of</strong> dalits as<br />

‘untouchables’ should be ended <strong>and</strong> the system <strong>of</strong> untouchability ended once <strong>and</strong> for all”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!