25.02.2015 Views

Asking the Right Questions, A Guide to Critical Thinking, 8th Ed

Asking the Right Questions, A Guide to Critical Thinking, 8th Ed

Asking the Right Questions, A Guide to Critical Thinking, 8th Ed

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

140 Chapter 10<br />

In this study, <strong>the</strong> researcher probably began with <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis that eating<br />

celery causes reduction of aggressive impulses, and he found evidence consistent<br />

with that hypo<strong>the</strong>sis. But let us offer several rival, or different, causes<br />

for <strong>the</strong> same findings.<br />

1. Research participants were highly suggestible, and <strong>the</strong> expectation of low<br />

levels of aggression was responsible for <strong>the</strong> reported differences; like <strong>the</strong><br />

sugar pill placebo effect in medicine, believing that eating celery lowers<br />

aggression might have stimulated a number of physical and mental<br />

processes that caused participants <strong>to</strong> feel less aggression.<br />

2. Participants wanted <strong>to</strong> please <strong>the</strong> researchers; thus, <strong>the</strong>y reported feeling<br />

low levels of aggression, even though <strong>the</strong>y did experience some aggressive<br />

feelings.<br />

3. Nothing is known about <strong>the</strong> women involved in <strong>the</strong> study. It is entirely<br />

plausible that those who eat celery are health conscious, and thus are<br />

more likely <strong>to</strong> exercise. The increased amounts of exercise can be an outlet<br />

for aggression, and thus lower feelings of aggression. Those who do<br />

not eat celery regularly may not exercise as often and thus do not have an<br />

outlet for <strong>the</strong>ir aggression.<br />

Now, let's leave <strong>the</strong> research labora<strong>to</strong>ry for a moment and move <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

national pages of our newspapers and examine an argument related <strong>to</strong> crime<br />

statistics.<br />

Since 1993, <strong>the</strong> levels of serious violent crime in <strong>the</strong> United States have decreased<br />

steadily. It is obvious that <strong>the</strong> heavy focus we place on law enforcement is no longer<br />

necessary. People are becoming civic minded and are choosing <strong>to</strong> no longer pursue<br />

a life of crime. Money spent on law enforcement can now better be spent elsewhere.<br />

The hypo<strong>the</strong>sis offered by <strong>the</strong> writer is that people's increasing civic engagement<br />

is <strong>the</strong> cause of <strong>the</strong> decrease in violent crimes over <strong>the</strong> last 12 years. But, let's again<br />

generate some plausible rivalcauses:<br />

1. Violent crime rates have decreased because of <strong>the</strong> increased focus on law<br />

enforcement <strong>the</strong> writer is specifically calling <strong>to</strong> be cut. An increased<br />

concern with law enforcement, and not <strong>the</strong> civic concerns of citizens,<br />

caused violent crime levels <strong>to</strong> decrease.<br />

2. Recent legislative actions have increased <strong>the</strong> punishments associated with<br />

violent crimes. These increased punishments make <strong>the</strong> costs of committing<br />

a violent crime far outweigh <strong>the</strong> benefits of committing violent<br />

crimes. People are not more civic minded, ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are looking out for<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir own personal interests.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!