Asking the Right Questions, A Guide to Critical Thinking, 8th Ed
Asking the Right Questions, A Guide to Critical Thinking, 8th Ed
Asking the Right Questions, A Guide to Critical Thinking, 8th Ed
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Are There Any Fallacies in <strong>the</strong> Reasoning? 85<br />
(J)<br />
<strong>Critical</strong> Question: Are <strong>the</strong>re any fallacies in <strong>the</strong> reasoning?<br />
Attention: A fallacy is a reasoning "trick" that an author might use while<br />
trying <strong>to</strong> persuade you <strong>to</strong> accept a conclusion.<br />
A Questioning Approach <strong>to</strong> Finding Reasoning Fallacies<br />
There are numerous reasoning fallacies. And <strong>the</strong>y can be organized in many<br />
different ways. Many are so common that <strong>the</strong>y have been given formal names.<br />
You can find many lengthy lists of fallacies in numerous texts and Web sites.<br />
Fortunately, you don't need <strong>to</strong> be aware of all <strong>the</strong> fallacies and <strong>the</strong>ir names <strong>to</strong><br />
be able <strong>to</strong> locate <strong>the</strong>m. If you ask yourself <strong>the</strong> right questions, you will be able<br />
<strong>to</strong> find reasoning fallacies—even if you can't name <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
Thus, we have adopted <strong>the</strong> strategy of emphasizing self-questioning<br />
strategies, ra<strong>the</strong>r than asking you <strong>to</strong> memorize an extensive list of possible<br />
kinds of fallacies. We believe, however, that knowing <strong>the</strong> names of <strong>the</strong> most<br />
common fallacies can sensitize you <strong>to</strong> fallacies and also act as a language "short<br />
cut" in communicating your reaction <strong>to</strong> faulty reasoning <strong>to</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs familiar with<br />
<strong>the</strong> names. Thus, we provide you with <strong>the</strong> names of fallacies as we identify<br />
<strong>the</strong> deceptive reasoning processes and encourage you <strong>to</strong> learn <strong>the</strong> names of<br />
<strong>the</strong> common fallacies described on page 98 at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> chapter.<br />
We have already introduced one common fallacy <strong>to</strong> you in our Dear<br />
<strong>Ed</strong>i<strong>to</strong>r example above. We noted that <strong>the</strong> writer personally attacked Sena<strong>to</strong>r<br />
Spendall instead of responding directly <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> sena<strong>to</strong>r's reasons. Seeing such<br />
an argument, <strong>the</strong> critical thinker should immediately ask, "But what about<br />
<strong>the</strong> arguments that Sena<strong>to</strong>r Spendall made?" The Dear <strong>Ed</strong>i<strong>to</strong>r reasoning<br />
illustrates <strong>the</strong> Ad Hominem fallacy. The Latin phrase Ad Hominem means<br />
"against <strong>the</strong> man or against <strong>the</strong> person." There are a variety of ways of making<br />
irrelevant attacks against a person making a claim, <strong>the</strong> most common of<br />
which is attacking his character or shifting attention <strong>to</strong> his circumstances or<br />
interests. Arguing Ad Hominem is a fallacy because <strong>the</strong> character or interests<br />
of individuals making arguments usually are not relevant <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong><br />
argument being made. It is attacking <strong>the</strong> messenger instead of addressing <strong>the</strong><br />
message.<br />
Here is ano<strong>the</strong>r brief example of Ad Hominem reasoning.<br />
Sandy: "I believe that joining sororities is a waste of time and money."<br />
Julie: "Of course you would say that, you didn't get accepted by any sorority."