25.02.2015 Views

Asking the Right Questions, A Guide to Critical Thinking, 8th Ed

Asking the Right Questions, A Guide to Critical Thinking, 8th Ed

Asking the Right Questions, A Guide to Critical Thinking, 8th Ed

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

212 Index<br />

Question (s):<br />

begging <strong>the</strong>, 96-97<br />

"right". See <strong>Critical</strong> thinking, questions<br />

<strong>to</strong> ask in<br />

"Who cares?" (assessing consequences<br />

of a controversy), 9<br />

Questionnaires/surveys, bias/dis<strong>to</strong>rtion in,<br />

124-126<br />

Range, 157-158. See also Statistics<br />

Reasons/reasoning, 25-35<br />

argument and, 26-27<br />

conclusion and, 19, 26, 31, 33<br />

deceptive (three common tricks), 84<br />

diagramming structure of, 31<br />

evidence as, 29<br />

"fresh" reasons, 32<br />

identifying/organizing, 27-29, 31-32, 35<br />

kinds of, 29-31<br />

practice exercises in identifying, 33-35<br />

Red herring fallacy, 95, 96<br />

Research studies as evidence 107, 118-127,<br />

134, 139-141, 143-144, 148<br />

biased surveys/questionnaires, 120, 124—126<br />

clues for evaluating, 122-123<br />

example, critical evaluation of, 126-127<br />

generalizing from, 123-124<br />

importance of evaluating, 136<br />

practice in evaluating claims supported by,<br />

134-136<br />

problems with findings from, 119-121<br />

rival causes (evaluating for), 139-141<br />

Reverse logic, 32<br />

Reverse role-playing, 63, 75, 81<br />

Rival causes. See Causation, rival causes<br />

Sampling, 123-124<br />

Scientific method, 119. See also Research<br />

studies as evidence<br />

Social questions: myth of <strong>the</strong> "right<br />

answer", 7-8<br />

Solomon, Norman, 47<br />

Sources, primary vs. secondary, 111-112<br />

Sponge model thinking, 3-4, 11, 72<br />

Statistics, 155-165<br />

clues for assessing, 162<br />

conclusion vs. proof, 158-159<br />

confusing averages (mean/median/<br />

mode), 156-158<br />

distribution, 157-158<br />

importance of assessing, 165<br />

mean/median/mode, 156-158<br />

omitted information, 110, 171<br />

practice exercises, 163-164<br />

range, 157-158<br />

unknowable/biased, 156<br />

Straw person fallacy, 91, 101-102<br />

Striking example (vs. proof), case study as, 128<br />

Strong-sense critical thinking, 10, 122<br />

Structure of reasoning, diagramming, 31<br />

Surveys/questionnaires, bias/dis<strong>to</strong>rtion in,<br />

123,124-126<br />

Testimonials as evidence, 107, 109-110<br />

bias, 109<br />

context of, 169<br />

omitted information, 110, 170<br />

practice in evaluating claims supported by,<br />

114-116<br />

selectivity, 109. See also Personal observation/experience<br />

as evidence<br />

<strong>Thinking</strong>:<br />

causal (indica<strong>to</strong>rs of), 138. See also Causation<br />

critical. See <strong>Critical</strong> thinking<br />

dicho<strong>to</strong>mous, 182-183<br />

feeling and, 8-9<br />

panning-for-gold style of, 3-7, 11, 36<br />

sponge style of, 3-4, 11, 72<br />

wishful, 92-93, 101<br />

Value (s), 53-69<br />

assumptions, 53-69, 169<br />

communica<strong>to</strong>r's background and, 61<br />

conflicts and, 56-57, 60-61<br />

consequences and, 61-62<br />

defined, 54-55<br />

group membership and, 61<br />

importance of identifying, 69<br />

patterns of behavior and, 66-67<br />

practice exercises, 68-69<br />

sample controversies, 60<br />

defined, 54-55<br />

judgments, 58-59<br />

list of common, 58<br />

missing preferences, perspectives, 169<br />

priorities, 62<br />

Weak-sense critical thinking, 10, 32<br />

Wishful thinking (fallacy), 92-93, 101<br />

Writing/speaking, your own, 21, 33, 48-49,<br />

67,78,99, 113, 150, 176

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!