09.03.2015 Views

July/August - MTA

July/August - MTA

July/August - MTA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT<br />

By <strong>MTA</strong>-SA Executive Director John Chapman<br />

The Great WorkCover Spin<br />

Well the new WorkCover<br />

rates have been released<br />

and there is good news and bad<br />

news for employers.<br />

Earlier this year, the<br />

WorkCover Board announced<br />

that it had reduced the average<br />

levy rate from 3 to 2.75 per cent.<br />

This reduction was too little<br />

and way overdue from the<br />

legislative changes which<br />

were put in place in 2008.<br />

These changes followed an<br />

independent review known as<br />

the Clayton Walsh review.<br />

At the time 1 the Government<br />

said the review was directed<br />

in part to an objective of “an<br />

average employer levy rate<br />

reduced to a range of 2.25 to<br />

2.75 per cent by <strong>July</strong> 1 2009”.<br />

Some in the business<br />

community think the latest<br />

reduction is a good result. I<br />

remind members and others that<br />

the current levy rate in Victoria<br />

is 1.387 per cent or just over<br />

half of our current average levy<br />

of 2.75 per cent. In New South<br />

Wales, their WorkCover levy<br />

has just been cut for the sixth<br />

successive time with a target rate<br />

of 1.66 per cent.<br />

Depending on what<br />

automotive industry sector you<br />

are in, your rate has hopefully<br />

gone down.<br />

But for some employers who<br />

manage their operations well<br />

and take their occupational<br />

health and safety responsibilities<br />

seriously, they are facing an<br />

increase in costs because of the<br />

removal of the Bonus/Penalty<br />

Scheme effective from<br />

<strong>July</strong> 1 2010.<br />

This ham-fisted decision<br />

typifies the mismanagement of<br />

the state’s workers compensation<br />

scheme – which is paid for by<br />

employers – which has been<br />

going on for too long.<br />

The decision to remove the<br />

Bonus/Penalty Scheme was made<br />

in mid 2008 but WorkCover<br />

did not communicate to every<br />

employer what it was going to do<br />

to replace it.<br />

After persistent lobbying<br />

by the <strong>MTA</strong> last year, a<br />

“consultation” process was<br />

put in place to develop an<br />

alternative to the Bonus/Penalty<br />

Scheme.<br />

But that alternative was never<br />

going to include a system which<br />

rewarded good employers and<br />

penalised not-so-good<br />

employers.<br />

Why? Because WorkCover<br />

had already committed to a new<br />

computer system which did not<br />

have the capacity for a bonus/<br />

penalty.<br />

Guess what – the outcome<br />

of the consultation process<br />

was a recommendation that a<br />

“consultant” should be hired<br />

to work with stakeholders to<br />

devise a new system.<br />

Is the WorkCover<br />

organisation so bereft of talent<br />

that it needs to bring in a high<br />

priced outsider to fix something<br />

that should be core business to<br />

the organisation?<br />

All this prevarication delayed<br />

any decision on the WorkCover<br />

rates for 2010/11.<br />

Businesses trying to plan a<br />

budget for 2010/11 would have<br />

found it virtually impossible<br />

to plan for the cost of workers<br />

compensation insurance.<br />

WorkCover seem to think it<br />

acceptable that we get the rates<br />

in the second week of June, just<br />

a few weeks before the start of<br />

the new financial year.<br />

That shows a fundamental<br />

disconnect with business and<br />

business planning.<br />

WorkCover’s latest letter<br />

to employers (something we<br />

said should have been issued<br />

months ago) tries to justify that<br />

removing the Bonus/Penalty<br />

Scheme is good for employers.<br />

Well it might be for the<br />

employers who have not<br />

managed their OH & S well –<br />

they won’t face a penalty.<br />

The letter in part states “This<br />

improved industry-based<br />

system without bonuses or<br />

penalties will be better for all<br />

stakeholders and will encourage<br />

industries to collaborate to find<br />

employment opportunities for<br />

workers with disabilities leading<br />

to further reductions in the<br />

total cost of workplace injuries.”<br />

What a load of cobblers! This<br />

is the sort of information we<br />

have come to expect from an<br />

organisation which is more<br />

intent on spin than the<br />

substance of properly managing<br />

claims.<br />

All sides of politics grimace<br />

when you mention the issue of<br />

WorkCover. Simply WorkCover<br />

doesn’t work well at all and<br />

hasn’t for many years.<br />

WorkCover has appointed<br />

a new Chief Executive, Rob<br />

Thomson, whose challenge is<br />

to rebuild confidence with the<br />

employer community. We look<br />

forward to any improvement.<br />

We will continue to hold<br />

WorkCover and the State<br />

Government to account on an<br />

organisation which is funded<br />

by employers who do not get an<br />

adequate say in its management.<br />

1<br />

Premier Rann Ministerial Statement to<br />

Parliament 26th February 2008<br />

www.mta-sa.asn.aumotor trade 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!