16.03.2015 Views

Special Edition-07.pdf - Lahore School of Economics

Special Edition-07.pdf - Lahore School of Economics

Special Edition-07.pdf - Lahore School of Economics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Post-Reform Era Maintaining Stability and Growth 69<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> economic growth both over the short run and the long run and<br />

sustaining solvency. Short term stability is to be interpreted rather broadly<br />

to mean both financial system stability as well as economic stability though<br />

both are intrinsically intertwined. Financial system stability encompasses a<br />

viable, market-based interest rate structure free <strong>of</strong> volatile movements,<br />

strength and resilience <strong>of</strong> financial institutions to withstand market swings<br />

and external shocks, and stable financial markets free <strong>of</strong> asset bubbles and<br />

gyrations in share prices. Economic stability is largely interpreted as price<br />

stability with acceptable levels <strong>of</strong> inflation, in addition to interest rate and<br />

exchange rate stability. It is difficult to argue which one <strong>of</strong> these is more<br />

important and peg the sequencing <strong>of</strong> corrective actions, though clearly it is<br />

difficult to think <strong>of</strong> economic stability in the face <strong>of</strong> unstable money and<br />

capital markets, or in the face <strong>of</strong> widespread distress among financial<br />

institutions, or both.<br />

Generally, stability <strong>of</strong> the financial system is largely understood as<br />

stability <strong>of</strong> the banking system only, and seldom does it cross over to concerns<br />

<strong>of</strong> stability <strong>of</strong> financial markets. Perhaps one <strong>of</strong> the reasons is that while<br />

something can be done to maintain stability <strong>of</strong> the banking system, and to<br />

some extent stability <strong>of</strong> money and short term debt markets, hardly anything<br />

can be done to ensure that capital markets remain stable beyond creating the<br />

necessary conditions with routine monetary management, if that.<br />

This is true <strong>of</strong> nearly all countries across the spectrum, not just<br />

developing countries. Monetary authorities find themselves saddled with<br />

their mainline responsibilities, and stay away from encroaching upon the<br />

operations <strong>of</strong> capital markets, known to be notoriously fickle and having a<br />

mind-set <strong>of</strong> their own. Further, with all the information flow, their<br />

analytical and predictive capabilities, computing prowess for risk and<br />

returns, sophisticated derivatives and hedge instruments, capital market<br />

participants everywhere find themselves upstaged time and again with large<br />

equity price corrections, exploding bubbles, and massive portfolio value<br />

losses. They have yet to discover ways to simply foresee market trends,<br />

much less devise ways to ensure stability.<br />

The comparative experience demonstrates that in the post-reform<br />

era, among newly opened and liberalized financial systems with enhanced<br />

exposure to market-based forces, both domestic and foreign, sooner or later<br />

both the banking system and financial markets have faced the onset <strong>of</strong><br />

instabilities that eventually degenerated into financial crises with a rapidity<br />

and severity that surprised everyone. The history <strong>of</strong> the past three decades<br />

<strong>of</strong> the post-reform era among many developing countries that have gone<br />

through reform processes, is replete with banking crises or foreign liquidity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!