16.03.2015 Views

Special Edition-07.pdf - Lahore School of Economics

Special Edition-07.pdf - Lahore School of Economics

Special Edition-07.pdf - Lahore School of Economics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Post-Reform Era Maintaining Stability and Growth 71<br />

At the system level, changes in the structure <strong>of</strong> the financial system<br />

occurred mainly due to the privatization <strong>of</strong> financial institutions as reflected<br />

in the asset holdings <strong>of</strong> the public and private sectors over the CY90-05<br />

period; the entry <strong>of</strong> new commercial banks, both domestic and foreign, new<br />

micro-finance banks, and Islamic finance institutions. Simultaneously,<br />

reforms and restructuring occurred among the clients <strong>of</strong> the banking<br />

system, mostly PSEs, which facilitated changes in the financial system.<br />

Changes in the operations occurred due to the revamping <strong>of</strong> the policy and<br />

regulatory regime governing financial intermediation and deregulation. The<br />

directed credit system that prevailed until the mid-1990s with layered<br />

allocative targets for specific sectors, sub-sectors or priority categories has<br />

been replaced by a market based credit system, and the role <strong>of</strong> DFIs and<br />

specialized financial institutions has been greatly reduced. The interest rate<br />

structure and foreign exchange regimes have been liberalized and are<br />

market-based, more or less.<br />

Privatization and Deregulation<br />

The dimensions <strong>of</strong> structural transformation owing to privatization<br />

can be gauged from changes in the ownership structure <strong>of</strong> assets together<br />

with changes in the patterns <strong>of</strong> financial intermediation and the<br />

participation <strong>of</strong> public and private sector financial institutions. At the system<br />

level, in CY90 the share <strong>of</strong> assets owned by public sector institutions, both<br />

banks and NBFIs in the total financial system assets was about 80%, and it<br />

dropped dramatically to about 26% in CY06. The converse holds true for<br />

the share <strong>of</strong> the ownership <strong>of</strong> private sector banks and private NBFIs over<br />

these years. Since the banking system is predominant in the financial<br />

system, this shift in the ownership structure was slightly more pronounced,<br />

but closely followed this pattern <strong>of</strong> change.<br />

While the structure <strong>of</strong> asset ownership thus shifted towards the<br />

private sector, the share <strong>of</strong> the public sector in the use <strong>of</strong> total financial<br />

resources mobilized in the country did not decrease, and this is not<br />

reflected by the share <strong>of</strong> the public sector in banking credit or banking<br />

assets alone. The reason is that nearly half <strong>of</strong> the annual flows <strong>of</strong> financial<br />

resources – the annual flows <strong>of</strong> financial savings, are being channeled to the<br />

public sector. This is being done through public sector borrowings from the<br />

financial system, NSS operations which are outside <strong>of</strong> the banking system<br />

but are a part <strong>of</strong> financial system flows, currency seignorage, and the<br />

inflation tax through their own modalities and mechanisms. Consequently,<br />

the public sector is still able to garner a hefty share <strong>of</strong> total financial<br />

resources generated in the country through the operations <strong>of</strong> the financial

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!