16.11.2012 Views

logical language - Developers

logical language - Developers

logical language - Developers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Segmentation and amalgamated componential structure are further configurative principles which distinguish related words in English.<br />

The relationships between car versus convoy, hanger versus rack, chess piece versus chess set, sentry versus blockade, piece of<br />

paper versus sheaf, girder versus (structural) framework, and coin versus roll of coins all exemplify these principles.<br />

Another type of contextual grouping of nouns occurs in binary sets, particularly in regard to body parts. These binary sets can comprise<br />

two identical referents as in a pair of eyes, however they are more often opposed or “mirror-image” (i.e., complementary) sets as in<br />

limbs, ears, hands, wings, etc.<br />

In Ithkuil, the semantic distinctions implied by the above examples as they relate to varying assortments of trees or persons would be<br />

accomplished by inflecting the word-stem for ‘tree’ or ‘person’ into one of nine configurations. Additional semantic distinctions on the<br />

basis of purpose or function between individual members of a set could then be made by means of Affiliation (see Section 3.2 below)<br />

and by the use of specific suffixes. For example, once the words for ‘forest’ or ‘crowd’ were derived from ‘tree’ and ‘person’ via<br />

Configuration, the Ithkuil words for ‘orchard,’ ‘copse,’ ‘team’ or ‘mob’ could easily be derived via affiliation and affixes. (Such<br />

derivations into new words using suffixes are explored in detail in Chapter 7: Suffixes.)<br />

Ithkuil words indicate Configuration via a synthetic consonantal affix immediately following the C+V stem which also indicates the<br />

Affiliation, Perspective, Extension and Essence of the stem. This is the Ca affix discussed in Section 2.1.1.<br />

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII XIV XV<br />

(((Cv) VL) Cg/Cs) Vr (Cx/Cv Vp/VL) Cr Vc Ci +Vi Ca VxC (Vf (’Cb))[tone] [stress]<br />

Phase +<br />

Sanction (+<br />

Illocution)<br />

Valence Validation<br />

OR<br />

Aspect<br />

(+ Mood)<br />

Pattern +<br />

Stem +<br />

Function<br />

Incorp.Root<br />

OR<br />

Phase +<br />

Sanction (+<br />

Illocution)<br />

Pattern + Stem +<br />

Designation of Incorp.<br />

Root<br />

OR<br />

Valence<br />

Root Case Illocution<br />

+<br />

Mood<br />

Configuration +<br />

Affiliation +<br />

Perspective +<br />

Extension +<br />

Essence<br />

Deriv.<br />

Suffix<br />

Context +<br />

Format<br />

Bias Version Designation<br />

+<br />

Relation<br />

The actual values of these Ca affixes are shown later in Table 5 in Section 3.5.3 below, following the explanation of Essence.<br />

The nine configurations are the UNIPLEX, DUPLEX, DISCRETE, AGGREGATIVE, SEGMENTATIVE, COMPONENTIAL,<br />

COHERENT, COMPOSITE, and MULTIFORM. The function and morphology of these categories are explained below along with<br />

examples of the various configurations applied to four different stems: ap h -, eq-, el-, and upšá-.<br />

3.1.1 UNI The Uniplex<br />

The UNIPLEX configuration indicates a single, contextual embodiment of the stem concept, i.e., one whole contextual unit of the basic<br />

nominal stem, e.g., a tree, a person, a screwdriver, a grape, a hammer blow, a hole. With verbs the UNIPLEX signifies a single,<br />

holistic act, state, or event, e.g., to be a tree, to become a person, to use a screwdriver, to eat a grape, to strike (once) with a<br />

hammer, to dig a hole. Examples: LISTEN<br />

p h al ‘a tree’<br />

elal ‘an utterance; a spoken word’<br />

eqal‘a person’<br />

upšál ‘an incident’<br />

For the set of affixes which mark this configuration, see Table 5 in Section 3.5.3 below.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!