Minutes 28-03-01 - Shire of Shark Bay
Minutes 28-03-01 - Shire of Shark Bay
Minutes 28-03-01 - Shire of Shark Bay
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ORDINARY COUNCIL MINUTES - <strong>28</strong> MARCH 20<strong>01</strong> Page 34<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> personnel and the number <strong>of</strong> projects and standard duties being<br />
performed restricts the amount <strong>of</strong> time physically available for ranger duties.<br />
Council currently budgets approximately $12,494 (450 hours) per annum for<br />
ranger duties. Only 76 hours <strong>of</strong> this allocation has been used to date.<br />
Conversations with the Works Supervisor have revealed that there is likely to be<br />
an increased workload in the ranger duties area for a number <strong>of</strong> reasons.<br />
1 Duties involved in jetty activities when Council takes over from<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Transport.<br />
2 Attending to bushfire matters each October.<br />
3 Checking regularly on camping grounds and illegal camping.<br />
4 Attending to parking related issues on foreshore.<br />
5 Dog control.<br />
6 Animal control.<br />
7 Pound duties.<br />
8 Attending court/issuing infringements.<br />
9 Administering Off Road Vehicles Act.<br />
10 Can become Special Constable for RSPCA.<br />
11 Enforcing <strong>of</strong> Litter Act.<br />
It is envisaged that a permanent part time employee would be sufficient for these<br />
duties.<br />
Legal Implications<br />
At present Council may not be fulfilling its obligations as specified under the Dog<br />
Act and Regulations, Fire Regulations, Off Road Vehicles Act and Litter Act.<br />
Policy Implications<br />
Not applicable.<br />
Financial Implications<br />
Costs associated with ranger duties need to be reviewed for the 20<strong>01</strong>/02 financial<br />
year.<br />
Strategic Implications<br />
Achieves a safer and more acceptable environment for Denham residents.<br />
Recommendation<br />
That Council consider this matter in its 20<strong>01</strong>/2002 budget deliberations.<br />
Voting Requirements<br />
Simple Majority Required.<br />
Date <strong>of</strong> Report 21 March 20<strong>01</strong><br />
The Chief Executive Officer advised that the complainant was unwilling to lodge<br />
pound complaint. Suggested that letters be sent to owners <strong>of</strong> troublesome dogs.<br />
The Finance and Administration Manager pointed out the actual hours spent on<br />
ranger patrols versus budgeted hours.<br />
The Chief Executive Officer raised the issue <strong>of</strong> disposing <strong>of</strong> impounded dogs.<br />
The Chief Executive Officer and Works Supervisor to discuss ranger patrols whilst<br />
The Town Supervisor, Mr George Christie, is on long service leave.<br />
Moved Cr Cane<br />
Seconded Mr Hook<br />
That the recommendation be adopted.<br />
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY