Ordinary 070530Minut.. - Shire of Shark Bay

Minutes of the Ordinary meeting of the Shark Bay Shire Council held in the Council
Chamber Denham on Wednesday 30 May 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 DECLARATION OF OPENING 3
2.0 RECORD OF ATTENDANCES / APOLOGIES / LEAVE OF ABSENCE GRANTED 3
3.0 RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS PUBLIC QUESTIONS ON NOTICE 3
4.0 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME 3
5.0 APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE 3
6.0 PETITIONS 3
7.0 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 3
8.0 ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE CHAIR 4
9.0 PRESIDENT'S REPORT 4
10.0 COUNCILLORS' REPORTS 5
11.0 TOWN PLANNING REPORT 7
11.1 Local Tourism Planning Strategy - Shire of Shark Bay 7
11.2 Development Application 14/2007 - Factory/Workshop 65 (Lot 325) Vlamingh Crescent, 21
Denham - D and M Graham
11.3 Development Application 15/2007 - Building Setback Variation 77 (Lot 115) Hughes 24
Street - D and M Rock
11.4 Subdivisional Proposal - Lot 1 Edel Location Nanga Road, Nanga 26
11.5 Outline Development Plan Part North Location 59 - Denham Road 29
These minutes were confirmed as a true and accurate record at the Ordinary Council meeting held on
27 June 2007
______________________________

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 2
11.6 Residential Development Design Guidelines - Stella Rowley Drive Subdivision 32
12.0 BUILDING REPORT 33
13.0 HEALTH REPORT 33
14.0 REPORTS BY STAFF 33
15.0 WORKS REPORT 34
15.1 Works Committee Meeting 34
15.1.1 Works Committee Meeting Minutes 27 February 2007 34
15.1.2 Works Committee Meeting 29 May 2007 39
16.0 TOURISM, RECREATION AND CULTURE REPORT 41
16.1 Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee 41
16.1.1 Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee Meeting Minutes 1 December 2006 41
16.1.2 Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee Meeting 7 May 2007 45
16.2 Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Management Committee 51
16.2.1 Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Management Committee Minutes 8 51
December 2006
16.2.2 Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Management Committee Meeting 23 May 55
2007
16.3 Gascoyne District Display - Perth Agricultural Royal Show 2007 58
17.0 ADMINISTRATION REPORT 61
17.1 Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Parliamentary Working Group 61
17.2 Policy 8.1 Annual Leave 63
17.3 Review of Register of Delegations 66
18.0 FINANCE 80
18.1 Financial Reports to 30 April 2007 80
18.2 Schedule of Accounts for Payments 81
18.3 Sale of Merchandise at Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre 82
18.4 Financial Assistance and Donation Requests for 2007/08 83
18.5 Rates - Differential Rates 86
18.6 Fees and Charges 2007/08 89
19.0 MOTIONS OF WHICH PREVIOUS NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN 102
20.0 QUESTIONS BY MEMBERS OF WHICH DUE NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN 102
21.0 INFORMAL DISCUSSION 102
22.0 URGENT BUSINESS APPROVED BY THE PERSON PRESIDING OR BY DECISION 103
23.0 MATTERS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS 103
23.1 Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Historical Artefacts 103, 109
23.2 Woodleigh Byro Road 108, 109
23.3 Monkey Mia Jetty 108, 110
24.0 DATE AND TIME OF NEXT MEETING 110
24.1 Wednesday 27 June 2007 at 9.00 am. 110
25.0 CLOSURE OF MEETING 110
26.0 INFORMATION BULLETIN 111
26.1 Chief Executive Officer's Report - May 2007 111
26.2 Manager Regulatory Services Report 112
26.3 Building Applications Processed 114
26.4 Summary of Building Construction Applications 2006/2007 114
26.5 Works Supervisor's Report 114
26.6 Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Monthly Activity Report 114
26.7 Building Healthy Communities Project 117
26.8 Other Specific Information Items 118

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 3
Minutes of the Ordinary meeting of the Shark Bay Shire Council held in the Council
Chamber Denham on Wednesday 30 May 2007
1.0 DECLARATION OF OPENING
The Deputy President, Cr R W Eddington, declared the meeting open at 9.02 am.
2.0 RECORD OF ATTENDANCES / APOLOGIES / LEAVE OF ABSENCE GRANTED
Present Cr R W Eddington Deputy President
Cr R G Blennerhassett
Cr B W Cane
Cr H J Crawford
Cr D O Hoult
Mr K J Matthews
Mr S Kocian
Mrs K M Lane
Mr J McKechnie
Mr G Brown
Chief Executive Officer
Finance and Administration Manager
Minute Clerk
Manager Regulatory Services
Works Supervisor
Apologies Cr L R Moss President
Cr K M Gordon
3.0 RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS PUBLIC QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Nil.
4.0 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
The public question time opened at 9.03am.
Mr T Hargreaves advised he had been out of the country for several weeks and requested
an update on the situation with the Western Australian Museum. The Deputy President
advised this was an item on the agenda to be discussed Behind Closed Doors and that at
the moment the situation was still under negotiation.
There being no further questions the public question time closed at 9.40 am.
5.0 APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE
Nil.
6.0 PETITIONS
Nil.
7.0 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
7.1 Confirmation of the Minutes of the Ordinary Council meeting held on Wednesday 2 May
2007.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 4
Moved Cr Crawford
Seconded Cr Cane
That the minutes of the Ordinary Council meeting held on Wednesday 2 May 2007, as
circulated to all Councillors, be confirmed as a true and accurate record.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
8.0 ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE CHAIR
8.1 AUSTRALIAN CITIZENSHIP CEREMONY - LESLIE ANN STAFFORD NA 105
The Deputy President announced that the Australian Citizenship Ceremony for Mrs Leslie
Ann Stafford would take place in the Council Chambers at 10.15 am. Mrs Stafford, family
and friends would then join with Councillors for morning tea.
8.2 ALINTA GAS - WOODLEIGH BYRO ROAD RO 105
The Deputy President advised that Mr Rod McNamara from Alinta Gas would address
Council on the situation with Woodleigh Byro Road.
9.0 PRESIDENT’S REPORT PR 101
The Extraordinary Election resulted in Rob Blennerhassett being elected to serve as a Town
Councillor until the October elections this year. I would like to pass on my congratulations to
Rob, I am sure he will make a worthwhile contribution as he has a well-known passion for
Shark Bay.
The recent publicity over the historical artefacts in the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery
Centre has caused a bit of a stir. The artefacts were originally found in Shark Bay and taken
away by the Museum at that time. They were returned by the Museum to be housed in the
Centre in late 2005. The media became involved due to a local identify, Tim Hargreaves,
contacting a number of media organisations, which supported the Government's view that
the Shire had no right to the items. The eight million dollar Centre was designed at great
cost with the State's Museum fully involved with the plan to house the items.
Mr Hargreaves was wrong to have expressed the view that the Museum staff were treated
badly by being 'held up' at the door of the Centre when arriving to pick up the artefacts. The
Museum was told well in advance that the Shire did not intend to hand over the items.
Arriving on our doorstep was a ploy to bully us further into submitting to its request. The
issue is too complex to make a full report at this time, however, if any community member
has any concern as to the Shire's involvement in this debate, make it your business to
obtain the facts by contacting the Council Office or Councillors.
Already the Government is starting to step back and take a bit more interest in the Shire's
stand instead of continually submitting to the bureaucrat's wishes and demands.
I am the first to agree that any person in our community has the right to express a view, and
I alternatively express the view that the actions taken by Mr Hargreaves have been
misguided and could only achieve self harm and affect the ongoing future of our Discovery
Centre at a time when we are working toward guaranteeing its viability, which is solely
caused by the builders, fit out consultants and Council spending much of the funding on
'high tech' viewing cases and air conditioning, without which the Centre's running costs
would be substantially lower and could run on its current turnover. I ask the community,
would all of these people involved in the design of the Centre get it so wrong unless they
were all sure of the undertakings given by the Government?
There have been many debates in other towns over the above topics, the Museum has
consistently handled the matters badly. The community has always come out of these
debates favourably, by demonstrating our determination to house and exhibit our local
history for the benefit of cultural and economic well being. The State Museum has a policy
that if regional areas have a Centre capable of housing and guaranteeing the artefacts

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 5
preservation, then the artefacts should stay in the locality. It was these verbal undertakings
by a large number of Museum staff and Politicians that the building was constructed to
house, at great cost, the items now in question. However, just prior to the completion of the
project, the Museum presented a contract that did not guarantee all the verbal undertakings
given for the internal design of the Centre as it now stands. Consequently I refused to sign
the undertaking, as did Council. How the Museum had the undertaking (contract) signed is
a demonstration of what the Council now is complaining about.
The Museum was taken by surprise by the Centre's quality, which has been described of
World Standard. Your Council built and paid for the transport cases to deliver these items to
Shark Bay at a cost of nearly $20,000. When the Museum staff recently arrived to demand
the items, the Museum personnel asked our staff for "their crates". This is only a small
example of how ridiculous these situations get. We ask the community to get behind the
Council and preserve our rights to embrace our cultural heritage for future generations.
10.0 COUNCILLORS’ REPORTS
10.1 CR R W EDDINGTON
* 3 May - Met with Alinta Gas in Carnarvon to discuss road repairs to Woodleigh Byro
Road.
* 7 May - Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre workshop Chaired by Hon Sally
Talbot MLC which included discussion regarding the Western Australian Museum
situation.
* Interviews with ABC Karratha and WIN Television News regarding the W A Museum
situation.
* 23 May - Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Management Committee
meeting.
* 28 May - Regional Road Group meeting in Gascoyne Junction.
* 29 May - Works Committee meeting.
10.2 CR H J CRAWFORD
* 3 May - Met with Shire of Carnarvon and Shire of Upper Gascoyne, Alinta Gas and
Saipan in Carnarvon to discuss road usage and condition especially in regard to
Woodleigh Byro Road.
* 14 May - With Works Supervisor and Mr Shane Guthrie of S & S L Guthrie
Earthmoving Contractors (WA) Pty Ltd inspected Woodleigh Byro Road, assessed its
condition and closed the road to heavy traffic.
* 28 May - Regional Road Group meeting in Gascoyne Junction.
* 28 May - Western Australian Local Government Association meeting in Gascoyne
Junction.
* 28 May - Met with Alinta Gas and Saipan personnel.
* 29 May - Works Committee meeting.
10.3 CR B W CANE
* 7 May - Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre workshop/Parliamentary working
group to discuss ways of improving the Centre's viability.
* 7 May - Hon Vince Catania MLC meeting to discuss Shark Bay World Heritage
Discovery Centre artefacts.
* 29 May - Works Committee meeting.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 6
10.4 CR D O HOULT
* 7 May - Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre workshop Chaired by Hon Sally
Talbot MLC.
* 7 May - Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee meeting.
10.5 CR R G BLENNERHASSETT
* 7 May - Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre workshop Chaired by Hon Sally
Talbot MLC.
* 8 May - Donations Review Panel reviewing applicants for 2007/08 with Chief
Executive Officer and Finance and Administration Manager.
8.2 ALINTA GAS - WOODLEIGH BYRO ROAD RO 105
The Deputy President introduced Mr Rod McNamara from Alinta Gas and thanked him for
his attendance at Council.
Mr McNamara commented on the ongoing problem with Woodleigh Byro Road and tabled a
letter from Alinta Gas which he hoped would alleviate the situation.
The Deputy President and Cr H Crawford advised that the Shire of Upper Gascoyne, at the
Regional Road Group meeting held in Gascoyne Junction on 28 May 2007, had suggested
that a committee be formed of the three Shires (Carnarvon, Shark Bay and Upper
Gascoyne) comprising the three Presidents and three Chief Executive Officers, or their
representatives, only, however neither Cr Eddington or Cr Crawford considered this
committee was warranted. All Councillors agreed as it was considered progress was being
made on the reinstatement of Woodleigh Byro Road.
Mr McNamara said that Stage 4 of the works required on the Dampier to Bunbury Natural
Gas Pipeline would utilise Woodleigh Byro Road, and Stage 5 would use Butchers Track in
addition to Woodleigh Byro Road. He recognised that the Shire of Shark Bay had closed
Woodleigh Byro Road to vehicles over three tonnes.
A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the necessity for a formal contract. Mr McNamara
stated that Alinta Gas was prepared to fully indemnify the Shire of Shark Bay and accept full
responsibility for any traffic which travelled along Woodleigh Byro Road. The Chief
Executive Officer said that once the formal contract and indemnity was received it would be
forwarded to Council's insurers for scrutiny and comment.
Mr McNamara requested that 10 trucks, tonnage not ascertained at this stage, be permitted
to access CS5 on the Pipeline by way of Woodleigh Byro Road as urgent works were
scheduled to commence on 5 June 2007. Councillors considered this should not be
possible without approved permits and escorts.
The Deputy President asked the Works Supervisor if escorting of the trucks would be
possible. The Works Supervisor replied that it would require two Council vehicles, one
forward and one in the rear, and all costs would need to be covered by Alinta Gas. Mr
McNamara then advised that the trucks would be travelling the road over a four week period
and would amount to 20 trucks in total.
The Works Supervisor said that it would not be possible for Shire of Shark Bay staff to be
escorts over the stated four weeks as this would prohibit them from usual duties and it was
not sustainable for staff to camp for that length of time at Woodleigh Byro Road waiting for
the trucks. Mr McNamara advised that Alinta Gas was prepared to employ an accredited
escort transport company.
Concern was expressed of trucks driving over the road while reinstatement works were in
progress.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 7
Mr McNamara advised that Alinta Gas was prepared to make an upfront payment to the
Shire of Shark Bay of 25% of the cost of the works required to reinstate Woodleigh Byro
Road including sinking a bore alongside the road provided the Shire acted as the contractor
for the total job. He said he would appreciate Council's advice as to whether it wished to
proceed along these lines to enable Woodleigh Byro Road to be reinstated.
The Deputy President thanked Mr Rod McNamara for his comments and advised that
Council would consider the offer/situation Behind Closed Doors later in the meeting.
The Works Supervisor left the Chambers at 9.29 am.
11.0 TOWN PLANNING REPORT
11.1 LOCAL TOURISM PLANNING STRATEGY - SHIRE OF SHARK BAY TO 106.03 TO 101
Author
Manager Regulatory Services
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil.
Précis
As a commitment to the finalisation of the Shire of Shark Bay Town Planning Scheme No 3
and in accordance with the Tourism Planning Taskforce Report's recommendations, the
Shire advised the Department for Planning and Infrastructure that it would progress the
preparation of a Local Tourism Planning Strategy for the Shire.
The Shire's planning consultants, the Department for Planning and Infrastructure and the
Department of Tourism WA have been requested to assist in the development of a brief in
order to prepare a Local Tourism Planning Strategy. The development of the brief was to
enable the cost of the Local Tourism Planning Strategy to be determined and referred to the
Shire's 2007/08 draft budget for consideration of funding.
This report considers the guidelines for the preparation of a Local Tourism Planning
Strategy, recognises the importance of a Local Tourism Planning Strategy, and considers a
Fee Proposal to prepare a Local Tourism Planning Strategy from the Shire's planning
consultants Taylor Burrell Barnett.
Background
Guidelines for the Preparation of Local Tourism Planning Strategies
Introduction
The Tourism Planning Taskforce Report 1 encourages Local Governments to undertake the
preparation of a Local Tourism Planning Strategy. This should be prepared where tourism
is a major economic driver to the area or where it has the potential to be a significant
industry, and requires a strategic framework to ensure that demand for tourism
development is addressed, and the tourism assets of the area are maximised.
[ 1 Tourism WA's Destination Development Strategies identify the key iconic tourism
experiences in the State in order to focus regional development resources on enhancing
these products, and to develop strategies to address gaps in infrastructure, accommodation,
attractions and other facilities. There are five strategies in total, one for each tourism
region.]
A tourism planning strategy differs from a conventional tourism strategy in that it focuses
more on land use and development control rather than marketing and promotion, which a
tourism strategy would normally address. Both strategies play an important role in the

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 8
development of a healthy tourism industry, and should be integrated to ensure consistency
in articulating the Local Government's tourism objectives.
These guidelines have been prepared to assist with the preparation of Local Tourism
Planning Strategies. They provide a guide to the scope, content and process of preparing
the Strategy. The size and detail of a Local Tourism Planning Strategy will depend on the
importance of tourism to a local area and these guidelines are intended to provide for this
flexibility.
Purpose of Local Tourism Planning Strategies
The main purpose of the Strategy is to provide Local Governments with a firm rationale for
determining the future land allocation, planning controls and infrastructure needs for tourism
in their area. The Local Tourism Planning Strategy should perform the following functions -
• Establish the aim, vision and objectives for tourism land use and development in the
Local Government area.
• Address the current and potential impact of tourism to the local economy including the
competitive advantages of the locality, through an assessment of the 5 'A's (
accommodation, amenities, attractions, activities, access), current and projected
demand, and opportunities for developing new and existing tourism products.
• Ensure the ongoing role of tourism in the locality is recognised in the land use
planning process through recommendations on appropriate tourist zones,
identification of tourism land requirements, and the introduction of specific tourism
development provisions.
• Provide the mechanisms for assessing the land use and design suitability of
incorporating a residential component within a tourism development on tourist zoned
land.
• Identify actions, lead agencies, and timeframes for the achievement of goals and
strategies.
• Identify strategic tourism sites or locations that provide for the retention and future
development of a range of tourist accommodation facilities to meet the projected
demand for that locality.
• Identify non-strategic tourism sites where a residential component may be considered
appropriate in order to provide a catalyst for short stay accommodation where it may
not otherwise occur.
• Provide direction and criteria for the assessment and consideration of Town Planning
Scheme Amendments in relation to tourism use.
• Ensure that the ongoing use of land for tourism is sustainable and contributes
positively to the achievement of the Local Government's broad objectives for the
municipality.
Preparation and Timing
Local Authority Town Planning Schemes are the principal instrument for local planning and
development control. As part of their five yearly Scheme review and local planning strategy
process, Local Governments with a significant tourism industry should prepare a Local
Tourism Planning Strategy and incorporate the recommendations into their local planning
strategy. It may also be appropriate to prepare a Local Tourism Planning Strategy prior to a
Scheme review where such a review has recently been undertaken, to provide a strategic
framework in assessing any applications to rezone tourism land.
Form and Content of the Local Tourism Planning Strategy
The detail and extent of a Local Tourism Planning Strategy will vary depending on the
characteristics and requirements of a particular Local Government area and the importance
of tourism to that area. However all Strategies will have fundamental similarities. The final
document should at a minimum -
• identify the Local Government's objectives for the future development of the industry,
• undertake an analysis of the existing tourism environment,
• articulate the level of support towards achieving the objectives,

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 9
• provide recommendations on how to achieve the objectives of the Strategy, and
• provide the measures by which the Strategy will be implemented.
The Local Tourism Planning Strategy should consist of an overview of the area's tourism
industry, consideration of the land and infrastructure requirements for the future and a
strategy, policies and proposal, including a map/plan, to guide future land use decisions.
The plan should illustrate any designated tourism precincts (existing and future), specific
tourism zones, strategic tourism sites/locations if identified, critical areas which may require
specific strategies (eg development along the coast), tourist attractions and infrastructure.
Other diagrams, illustrations and photographs may be included in the Strategy to help
explain the analysis, policies and proposals. The Local Tourism Planning Strategy should
avoid the formulation of detailed policies and maintain a strategic approach. Detailed policy
direction is more appropriately included in Town Planning Scheme provisions or local
planning policies as an outcome of the Local Tourism Planning Strategy.
The general scope and content of a Local Tourism Planning Strategy is provided below.
Introduction
The introductory section should provide a brief description of the intent and scope of the
Strategy. It should also clarify the status of the Strategy as a non-statutory document to be
used as a guide in preparing local Planning Strategies, Town Planning Schemes and
Amendments, local Planning Policies, and for subdivision, strata and development
assessment purposes.
The introduction should briefly describe the structure and layout of the Strategy. Some of
the major issues which the Strategy is intended to address may also be discussed, as this
may influence the emphasis of the Strategy. For example, a Strategy for an area where
tourism is secondary to another land use would have a different focus than a Strategy for an
area where tourism is the dominant industry.
Study Area
The study area for the Strategy would usually correspond with the municipal boundaries.
However where there are issues which transcend the boundaries of the Local Authority,
early liaison and consultation with neighbouring Local Authorities will be necessary. In some
instances it may be appropriate for Local Authorities to carry out joint/regional Local Tourism
Planning Strategies.
It may also be appropriate to divide the Local Authority area into tourism precincts, on the
basis that certain areas display different characteristics and therefore should be treated
differently. Criteria for defining tourism precincts should take account of -
• Geographical or physical characteristics - such as areas of coastal, forest, rural, or
central city/town centre nature.
• Attractions - for example wineries, shopping, adventure. (Tourism WA utilises five
clusters of iconic experiences in its promotional and development activities - Marine,
Outback and Adventure, Food and Wine, Forest and Wildflowers and People and
Lifestyle - which could be used as a guide for the more diverse Local Authorities.)
Where possible, edges of precincts should be defined by physical features such as streets.
State, Regional and Local Context
The Local Tourism Planning Strategy should recognise the role and importance of the
industry within the local community, having regard to both endorsed and draft State and
Regional Planning Policies in respect to tourism, and provide an interpretation of these in
the context of the local area.
The Local Tourism Planning Strategy will need to respond to an demonstrate achievement
of State Policies. In addition, an assessment should be undertaken of the importance of the
local area's tourism industry to the Local Authority, State Government and Regional
Development Commission. An evaluation of the iconic significance of the locality or any

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 10
attractions within the area as specified in the relevant 'Destination Development Strategy' 1
should be provided.
[ 1 Tourism WA's Destination Development Strategies identify the key iconic tourism
experiences in the State in order to focus regional development resources on enhancing
these products, and to develop strategies to address gaps in infrastructure, accommodation,
attractions and other facilities. There are five strategies in total, one for each tourism
region.]
This section should contain an assessment of any tourism related controls in the Local
Authority's Town Planning Scheme, and development schemes, other non-statutory policies
and guidelines and any other relevant planning controls in place. Current local Town
Planning Scheme provisions and relevant Planning Policies should be identified and
considered in the context of the objectives of the draft Local Tourism Planning Strategy. An
outcome of the endorsed Local Tourism Planning Strategy may be that certain Scheme
provisions and Policies are modified or revoked.
A review of existing tourist zoned land should be undertaken to determine whether they
should be retained for tourism or rezoned for a more suitable use. Some sites may be
unsuitable for tourism given their location, size, history, or incompatible surrounding/
encroaching development. A checklist has been prepared by Tourism WA to assist in
determining the strategic significance of a site from a physical assessment.
In assessing the current land use and development controls relating to tourism, the following
issues should be considered -
• How do the existing zones and development control measures influence the pattern
and type of tourism developments? (This may be a useful exercise if there are
obvious issues/problems such as disproportionate numbers of a particular type of
development.)
• Do the existing planning provisions and policies support and encourage tourism
development? For example, a local planning strategy may not sufficiently
acknowledge tourism as the important economic contributor it can be. Is permanent
residential or other non-tourism land uses permitted with a tourist zone and has this
impacted on the viability of tourism developments?
• Has the absence of any tourism specific policies/zones adversely impacted on the
quality/development of tourism accommodation? For example, the lack of a specific
tourist zone (or use of flexible tourist zones) has resulted in land being developed for
non-tourist uses (at the expense of tourism investment).
Objectives
This section should outline the objectives of the Local Tourism Planning Strategy, based on
the Local Authority's approach to planning for tourism in its community within the State
Policy framework. The objectives should indicate what the intended outcomes of the
Strategy are and how they will be achieved. They are intended to assist the Local Authority,
the community and the State Government in evaluating decisions in relation to the
implementation of the Strategy.
Such objectives may include -
• To provide for the sustainable growth of tourism by identifying and retaining sites for
the future development of a range of tourist accommodation and attractions to meet
the projected demand for the locality.
• To encourage affordable holiday accommodation through the appropriate zoning of
suitable land to assist the retention of existing caravan parks and camping grounds in
prime locations.
• To protect identified tourism locations or sites from the encroachment of
uncomplimentary or conflicting land uses.
• To encourage a high standard of design and layout and the provision of facilities for
tourism developments.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 11
• To identify the anticipated growth of tourism in the locality and to encourage
development that compliments the locality's existing tourism attractions.
• To ensure that the tourist attractions in the locality are managed and capitalised on by
protecting them from incompatible development.
• To reflect the importance of tourism to the locality through its local Planning Strategy,
Town Planning Scheme and local Planning Policies.
• To ensure tourism development provides a bona fide tourism function and the
Planning Scheme does not facilities residential use of land zoned for tourism.
The objectives may also address issues of concern to a particular Local Authority, such as
the impact that tourism may have on an established industry.
Existing Situation (Supply/Audit)
Visitor Information
This section should provide a broad analysis of the social, economic and physical
characteristics of the Local Authority area, to determine where the tourism 'strengths' and
'weaknesses' lie. Information on the importance of tourism to the local economy should be
provided, such as direct and indirect employment figures created through tourism,
seasonality impacts, statistics on current visitation numbers, where the yare from, how long
they are staying for, how much they are spending and their demographic characteristics.
This information may be available from Tourism WA.
Tourist Accommodation Assessment
A general description of the tourist accommodation in place, including an audit of the
existing range and standard of accommodation in the area, number of rooms/beds available
and average occupancy rates should be provided. This audit should be based on existing
supply and occupancy information including information on accommodation type, takings/
room rates, facilities, number of rooms, and age/general condition of developments. For
larger Local Authorities the majority of this information may be available form the Australian
Bureau of Statistics. An assessment should be undertaken of the likely accommodation
supply resulting from planned developments identified in Tourism WA's Tourist
Accommodation Development Register.
Existing and Future Infrastructure
Consideration of gaps in existing and planned infrastructure, including transport, power and
water supplies, effluent disposal, medical and emergency services, leisure and shopping
facilities related to an required for a sustainable tourism industry should be undertaken.
This should be followed by an assessment of the capacity of existing infrastructure supply to
handle existing and new development, the identification for any weaknesses in the current
infrastructure provision, the need for any additional facilities to support new tourism
development, and whether there are any planned future infrastructure expansions.
A summary of current and future public investment programs which may influence the
Strategy, such as planned development sites or land releases, or major infrastructure
projects such as airports/harbours. After this assessment has been undertaken, ways to
encourage new tourism related facilities or attractions to an area through the planning
process should be determined. For example, the introduction and allocation of appropriate
zonings, development incentives, or a policy position on specific land uses.
Tourist Attractions/Events
Principal tourist attractions and events and emerging tourism development opportunities,
including attractions and accommodation, should be identified. An audit should be
undertaken of current and proposed attractions (iconic and non iconic in accordance with
the Destination Development Strategies), events and activities, with an assessment of
quality, standards, numbers of visitors to each event, when they occur, and for what length
of time.
Caravan/Camping
An assessment should be undertaken of the availability, retention and identification of
Crown and private land for the provision of caravan and camping grounds and other forms
of affordable tourist accommodation. This should involve the identification of the amount of

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 12
Crown Land currently used for tourist accommodation in the locality, the type of
accommodation, lease/management arrangements, and any future Crown Land
development opportunities. The Strategy should investigate ways to assist with the
retention and affordable accommodation, particularly on Crown Land, in conjunction with the
Department for Planning and Infrastructure and the Department of Environment and
Conservation.
Using this data, an assessment can be undertaken on whether the current tourism product
is adequately meeting the needs of the tourist and if there are any specific constraints or
issues which are impeding the tourism experience. This may include, for example, a lack of
accommodation of a certain standard, a lack of quality amenities, or a failure to capitalise on
a local attraction or potential tourism asset. The Strategy can then make recommendations
on how to resolve the gaps identified in the analysis.
Future Estimates (Demand)
An audit of the existing situation should be accompanied by estimates of future tourism
growth and therefore the likely demand for short stay accommodation, the range of
accommodation types required, and appropriate supporting amenities and infrastructure.
This analysis is difficult to do accurately at the local level, but can be undertaken by either
extrapolating trends in past visitation to the local area, or by projecting future demand to the
local area based on forecasting conducted at a regional or national level. While the past
visitation approach should be used where possible, in smaller Local Authorities (or new
tourist destinations) the base data may not be available. Cross referencing both
approaches would also be a useful exercise.
A large amount of tourism data is held by Tourism WA and other relevant Agencies. The
information that will be required to estimate the future tourism demand for a Local Authority
and therefore the amount of land and resources to provide for that demand could include
the following -
1 The trend in visitor numbers over the past decade. This information is available from
Tourism WA for the Local Authorities with a significant tourism industry.
2 Projected visitor numbers (domestic and international) for the following decade. It is
recommended this information be determined by extrapolating the trend identified in
point 1 over the following decade with adjustments made for known impacts or
events, such as changes in transport options (eg new or lost road or air services), the
level or quality of attractions, amenities and activities, changes in general visitor
expectations (such as greater consumer interest in particular accommodation types),
new or planned marketing campaigns, significant proposed developments which are
likely to increase the overall popularity of the area (such as Cable Beach Club Resort
with Broome).
3 Details on the breakdown of visitors by accommodation type used over the past
decade, and occupancy rates for different accommodation types in the area.
4 Projected demand for the following decade by accommodation type. Using the trends
established in point 3, extrapolate the expected demand for different accommodation
types within the locality.
Once the above information is gathered, the likely demand for different accommodation
types and the approximate level of capacity needed above that currently available can be
considered. This will need to be carried out in conjunction with a study of existing
accommodation supply by type available.
Tourism WA's 'Tourist Accommodation Land Requirement' report can be used to determine
the land size needs for the various types of accommodation and land allocations can then
be determined.
The Strategy
This section should examine the options for tourist development in the locality from which an
appropriate Strategy is derived, based on the desired future character for the locality and
achievement of outcomes. The final Strategy should incorporate the following -

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 13
1 Identification and application of sustainability principles to tourism development
(economic, social/cultural and environmental), including the implications of poorly
developed and managed tourism developments.
1.1 Economic - an economic sustainability assessment should consider two main
issues -
a) The ability of the locality to sustain investment in tourism infrastructure
and assets from a cost benefit perspective. This would relate to the
opportunity cost of the investment of resources in tourism in the local area
and acknowledges the competing demands for limited resources from
other industries and activities. An assessment of whether the locality has
tourism assets of sufficient iconic quality to justify the level of investment
being considered. The employment creation potential of tourism
investment, the delivery of sustainable jobs to regional communities and
the employment diversification benefits of tourism should be noted in the
assessment.
b) The viability of tourism accommodation development in the locality based
on the supply and demand profile, occupancy rates and average room
rates for the types of accommodation being considered, forecast growth
in visitation, expected new supply coming on stream and required
investment returns. Land allocation for different development types and
the status of that land (being strategic or non strategic) needs to consider
these viability issues. The designation of a strategic tourism site needs to
account for the ability of local demand to sustain a 100 percent tourism
development. A non-strategic site may enable a tourism development to
take place and act as a catalyst for future tourism investment in the area
which would not normally occur for considerable time as a strategic site.
A balance needs to be struck between the benefits of encouraging a
tourism development against the loss of 25 percent tourism land on a
high quality site.
1.2 Social/Cultural - an assessment of the impact of any tourist related
developments (accommodation or attractions) on the local community, for
example, the capacity of social infrastructure to cater for seasonal demand from
visitors, the impact on Indigenous culture, the impact on an area's community
development (eg transformation of coastal towns to tourist towns), availability of
local (skilled) employees, provision of supporting infrastructure/facilities to
assist local communities.
Tourism can have a perceived (and actual) negative impact on local
communities particularly in seasonal areas, and as such it is necessary to
determine the level of support for tourism within the local community. The
following matters should be considered -
O
O
The Council should determine its own level of support for the industry and
articulate its willingness to make decisions that support the development
of the local industry, including investment in infrastructure and facilities.
This would involve the zoning of appropriate land for tourism and its
subsequent protection for that use in the face of pressure for higher order
development.
Seek a proactive level of support from the local Chamber of Commerce
or business groups, community organisations and any other relevant local
groups to identify a willingness to allocate resources to the development
of the local industry. Involving these groups in the early stages of the
Local Tourism Planning Strategy will assist in determining the level of
community support for tourism.
1.3 Environment - consideration of the requirement for an environmental impact
assessment for proposed tourism developments, addressing the potential
impact of development on environmentally sensitive locations, and providing

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 14
opportunities and incentives for development to incorporate different products,
systems, and construction methods.
2 A rationale for the application of tourist zonings in a Town Planning Scheme, including
an assessment of land supply, types of accommodation and scale/character of
development.
This component should combine the research and analysis information to arrive at
conclusions about what types of tourism developments are needed, how much land,
in what location, in what strategic status. For example, an identified need for a larger
or additional caravan park in the next three years, or a 100 bed hotel in five years.
An assessment should be undertaken of the types of tourist zones currently used and
obvious physical patterns of tourism development, any historical trends impacting
development, and the availability of land for future tourism development.
Future tourist zonings should reflect the scale/character of preferred development.
This includes the potential for the creation of specific tourist zones that reflect
particular types of accommodation - the tiered zoning framework (eg 'hotel', cabin/
chalet zones).
The Strategy should also address the need for strategic tourism locations and special
control areas. The Ministerial Taskforce Report provides an example of potential
zones and how they are defined, and appropriate classifications for land uses within a
model zoning table.
3 Identification of strategic and non-strategic tourism sites/locations or activity locations
and the specific processes, provisions and assessment criteria to guide the planning
and development of these areas. Sites identified as 'Strategic' will be 100 percent
short stay. 'Non-strategic' sites may have a maximum of 25 percent permanent
residential. These categories should be differentiated via the zoning table in the Town
Planning Scheme.
Criteria for strategic site identification (as per the Ministerial Taskforce Report) are as
follows -
a) Sustainability - the site should provide for tourism development that is
sustainable in respect of its construction, operation and function.
b) Planning context - the site has been identified in a regional planning strategy or
in a region plan as having high tourism potential and value.
c) Accessibility - the ease of access to the site or the associated attraction
generally should be high, and appropriate to the nature of the facility or
attraction.
d) Uniqueness - the site may contain or be in the vicinity of an attraction of
landmark value, or itself be of landmark value.
e) Setting - the site may have an aspect and outlook that facilitates recreational
tourism activities and/or the creation of a tourism character and ambience.
f) Tourism activities and amenities - the site provides, or has easy access to,
supporting activities and amenities such as tours, fishing, historic sites, walk
trails, cafes, etc.
g) Alternative sites - the site has an element of scarcity in that it may be the only
opportunity to achieve a significant tourism development in an area.
h) Suitability - the site is located within a land use context that will not overly limit
the extent of activities of guests within the resort due to amenity impacts on
adjoining residents or where the adjoining uses potentially will detract from the
tourism character of the site.
i) Capability - the site has the capacity to be developed for tourism purposes and
accommodate the associated services in a manner that does not detract from
the natural attributes of the site.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 15
j) Size - the site should be of a size adequate to accommodate a sustainable
tourism facility of the appropriate type for the location, with consideration of
future expansion, and exhibit potential for the necessary level of services to be
provided.
k) Function - Strategic tourism sites may perform a specific function, such as a
traditional social or cultural role, and/or serve a particular clientele.
4 An assessment of the capacity of existing tourist zoned land the availability of land for
future tourism development. This analysis would be undertaken as part of the
'existing situation' section.
5 Recognition of the existing and potential level of tourism development that can be
catered for on land not zoned specifically for tourism purposes. This will involve an
assessment of non-tourist zones in the Scheme which allow for tourism related
development. These zones can complement tourist zonings and may be more useful
in situations where the local industry needs more associated activities and amenities
than actual direct tourist accommodation (such as cafes or gift shops) or there is a
scarcity of suitable new tourism sites. (It should be noted that mixed use zones
should not be used as surrogate tourist zones where there are no tourist zones and
short stay accommodation is not the highest and best use of land.)
6 Approaches to providing for the long term protection of the range and volume of
tourism developments through addressing -
identified strategic tourism sites to be retained for tourism-only purposes,
identified non-strategic tourist zoned land on which up to a maximum of 25
percent of the number of units/size of site may be developed with no occupancy
restriction use,
the function of caravan parks as providing for tourist, seasonal, and residential
use and the need to provide adequate capacity to accommodate each category
through limiting long-stay use of tourism parks and the conversion of caravan
parks to park home parks,
the proportion of cabin/chalet development that should be permitted within
caravan parks and camping grounds, reflecting the character of existing users
and projected demand,
provisions for rural tourist accommodation and other complementary tourist
uses in appropriate rural areas via a Policy mechanism and Scheme provisions,
land that should be considered for future tourism use as a tourism precinct
(strategic location), and land no longer required to be retained for tourism use,
and
mechanisms to ensure the sustainable retention of a range of tourist
accommodation within the locality and to support emerging tourism
development opportunities.
The Local Tourism Planning Strategy should identify the need for any specific policies or
measures required to improve the tourism environment and promote higher standards of
tourism development, such as townscape improvements, economic development plans or
strategies, proposals to upgrade public infrastructure and any design guidelines for the
various tourist accommodation categories or particular sites/locations, where appropriate.
These guidelines should incorporate issues such as site size and development density to
guide the establishment of sustainable developments. The Strategy should also establish
the requirement for the preparation of development guide plans/outline development plans
and landscape and community impact assessment where considered necessary.
Implementation of the Strategy
This section will outline the actions needed to implement the Strategy. Any proposed Policy
mechanisms and Amendments to the local Planning Scheme in terms of additional tourist
zones and Scheme provisions and Policies should also be identified.
The Strategy outcomes may be incorporated directly into the Scheme in the form of zones
or Policies or a combination of both. Alternatively, provisions may be included in the
Scheme which makes reference to the Strategy and/or applicable Policies, to give the

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 16
Strategy greater statutory power and improve the clarity and effectiveness of the Scheme in
relation to tourism matters.
This section should identify an priorities for early action, and any planning related incentives
or measures which may be required to encourage tourism development within an area, such
as increased density or inclusion of residential components.
Process of Approval
The Local Tourism Planning Strategy provides the framework for the identification of
strategic tourism sites, the application of proposed tourist zones, and the principles for the
assessment of residential use proposal for tourism developments. It also provides a basis
for decision making in tourism planning and development control and the recommendations
will be incorporated into the local Planning Strategy. Accordingly, the Strategy should be
assessed by Tourism WA and endorsed by the Western Australian Planning Commission in
addition to being adopted by the Local Authority.
Monitoring and Review
It is recommended that the Strategy be reviewed and revised on a regular basis to
determine whether the objectives and strategies are being achieved. Given the statutory
requirement to review a Town Planning Scheme every five years, the Strategy could be
reviewed to coincide with this timeframe.
Assistance and Information Sources
The cost and effort in preparing a Local Tourism Planning Strategy will vary considerably
between Local Authorities depending on the size and importance of tourism to the area.
Local Authorities such as Broome and Busselton for example would require a more
comprehensive Strategy than Local Governments with a lower tourism priority.
Tourism WA has control and knowledge of extensive data and information sources which
may assist Local Authorities in the preparation of their Strategy. A supply/demand model
has been prepared which will enable Local Authorities with a significant tourist market to
forecast the demand for tourism accommodation and plan for appropriate sites to be zoned
and protected. Tourism WA's planning team is also available to provide some guidance and
assistance throughout the process. It is anticipated that other Agencies and bodies will see
the benefit of a Local Tourism Planning Strategy, and Tourism WA will work closely with
such stakeholders to maximise their involvement and expertise where possible.
Appendix One
Content of Local Tourism Planning Strategies
1 Introduction
2 Study Area
3 The State, Regional and Local Context
4 Objectives
5 Existing Situation
• Supply, opportunities, strengths, weaknesses, constraints
• Demographics of the existing tourist market
• Economic impacts on the industry
• Private and public sector investment opportunities
• Current infrastructure commitments relating to tourism development
• Current tourism development approvals
• Identification of future public work programs or major development proposals
which may influence tourism development
• Current tourism related planning controls in place
• Audit of the current tourism accommodation in place
• Details of events and attractions
6 Future Estimates
• Current and future demand
• Growth projections

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 17
7 The Strategy
• Description and comparison of any alternative strategies examined
• Specific strategies or measures, eg townscape improvements, urban design
guidelines, economic development plans or strategies, proposals to upgrade
public infrastructure, etc.
• General strategies for the development of tourism accommodation
• The location of new tourism development sites
• The justification for the rezoning of existing tourism sites to an alternative zone
• The proposed range of tourism zones
• The processes, provisions and assessment criteria to guide development of any
identified strategic tourism site/location
8 Implementation
• Changes to zoning and Town Planning Scheme provisions
• Promotion and assistance by Local Government and State Government
• Incentives and measures for private sector involvement
• Priorities and timeframes
9 Monitoring and Review
Appendix Two
Further Information and Resources
Information and assistance can be obtained from the following references -
Department for Planning and Infrastructure (2004) Report of the Ministerial Taskforce to the
Minister for Planning and Infrastructure - Investigation of the Impact of Combining Tourist
and Permanent Residential Accommodation on Tourist Zoned Land and the Impact of Strata
Titling of Tourist Accommodation.
Tourism Western Australia (2005) Tourism Accommodation Development Register
Tourism Western Australia (2005) Destination Development Strategies
Tourism Western Australia (2006) Draft Tourism Accommodation Land Requirement Report
Tourism Western Australia (2006) Strategic Tourism Sites Checklist
Australian Bureau of Statistics website (www.abs.gov.au)
Western Australian Planning Commission website (www.wapc.wa.gov.au)
Department for Planning and Infrastructure website (www.dpi.wa.gov.au)
Tourism Western Australia website (www.westernaustralia.com)
Decipher - tourism research website (www.decipher.biz)
Bureau of Tourism Research website (www.btr.gov.au)
Department of Regional Development website (www.regional.wa.gov.au)
Australian Government - Tourism Impact Model for Local Government
(www.industry.gov.au)
Appendix Three
Process for Preparation and Approval of Local Tourism Planning Strategies
1 Determine the need for a Strategy -
Local Government resolves to prepare a Strategy, establish a brief, and appoint
consultants and/or a steering committee. Tourism WA and the Department for
Planning and Infrastructure should be consulted within the preparation of the brief.
2 Determine the structure/level of consultation -
This may involve representation from industry, community and environment in
the establishment of a tourism planning taskforce.
Identify objectives, goals, and strategies for tourism from a planning viewpoint.
3 Research on tourism industry in area -
Issues to address -
Demand, supply, opportunities, strengths, weaknesses, threats.
Economic impacts on the industry.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 18
Private and public sector investment opportunities.
Infrastructure requirements relevant to tourism growth and development.
Financial/budget/human resource implications for implementation.
Continuity of commitment to tourism in the community.
Information and assistance may be available from Tourism WA/Regional Tourism
Organisations/Regional Development Commissions.
4 Preparation of draft Strategy with assistance from Tourism WA, the Department for
Planning and Infrastructure and local tourism industry, adopted by the Local
Government for public comment. The Strategy is forwarded to the Western Australian
Planning Commission and Tourism WA for comment prior to advertising.
5 Public Consultation -
Strategy is advertised for public comment.
Modifications made to Strategy in light of submissions received.
6 Final approval by Local Government Council granted, Strategy is then referred to the
Western Australian Planning Commission for endorsement.
7 Strategy recommendations are incorporated into local Planning Strategy/Town
Planning Scheme. Other actions are undertaken as recommended in the Strategy,
such as detailed Policy formulation.
Planning consultants Taylor Burrell Barnett advise as follows -
FEE PROPOSAL - LOCAL TOURISM PLANNING STRATEGY
We refer to our various discussions through the consideration of Town Planning Scheme No 3 in
relation to the need and importance for the preparation of a Local Tourism Planning Strategy. We
are pleased to provide the following advice and fee proposal for the preparation of a Local Tourism
Planning Strategy.
BACKGROUND
We have undertaken preliminary consultation with Tourism WA and the WA Planning Commission
in relation to the brief for the preparation of a Local Tourism Planning Strategy, in particular
Tourism WA has provided a draft guideline document to assist Local Authorities in the preparation
of a Local Tourism Planning Strategy. We have been advised that these guidelines will form the
basis for the preparation of a Planning Bulletin by the WA Planning Commission.
The Western Australian Planning Commission has only recently finalised the Planning Bulletin
associated with the Tourism Taskforce report. The Planning Bulletin will be released shortly to the
public and it will be necessary to review the proposal based on the Planning Bulletin.
Whilst at a preliminary stage we have used the guidelines as the basis for determining the scope of
works for the preparation of the Local Tourism Planning Strategy. In the event that the Planning
Bulletin varies the requirements there may the need to reassess the tasks and fees at that time.
LOCAL TOURISM PLANNING STRATEGY
There are a number of planning matters which require direction through a Local Tourism Planning
Strategy, at a macro level this includes the importance of tourism to the economy and financial
consideration and at a micro level assessment of sites of strategic and non-strategic significance and
the planning framework for decision making. These issues are summarised as follows -
• Tourist accommodation on pastoral leases and land under the ownership of the former
Conservation and Land Management
• Potters Block Tourist/Residential Precinct
• Review of Nanga Station and provisions
• Rationalisation of Special Use site No 3 back to residential
• Audit of existing tourist development a demand and strategic direction for future tourist
accommodation
• Consistency of provisions for Tourist Uses within Town Planning Scheme No 3

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 19
As part of the preparation of the Local Planning Strategy covering the above aspects, we will need to
undertake a site inspection of approximately 3 days duration, attended by a Senior Associate or
Associate from this office.
A special visit to Denham will be required to meet with the Steering Committee.
FEES
Based on Appendix 1 - Content of Local Tourism Planning Strategies and Appendix 3 - Process for
Preparation and Approval of Local Tourism Planning Strategies we have formulated the attached
draft Project Methodology and associated costings specific to Shark Bay. (Includes site inspection,
but excludes accommodation, airfares, car hire and meals whilst in Denham.)
This fee is a draft only for discussion purposes. It makes a number of assumptions, including the
number and location of the project meetings, number of meetings with key stakeholders etc. In the
event that there is an agreed change to the Methodology, this is likely to result in a variation to the
overall estimated fee. No variation will be undertaken without first obtaining the approval of the
Client.
The above fees do not include GST or disbursements (base mapping, contour mapping, aerial
photography, flights, accommodation, purchase of documents/references, colour rendering, copies and
prints, couriers, additional site inspections, etc).
We trust the above tasks and fee is acceptable to Council and seek your comments and direction in
relation to commencing the tasks detailed above.
SHIRE OF SHARK BAY - LOCAL TOURISM PLANNING STRATEGY
Draft Proposal and Fee Schedule
Company Taylor Burrell Barnett
Hourly Rate $220 $155 $90
Lex
Barnett
Karen
Wright
Drafting
Total
Task
Hours
Cost
GST
Total
Fees
Inc
GST
TASK 1 Project Inception
1.1 Finalise brief 1 2 3 $530 $53 $583
1.2 Determine Steering
2 2 $310 $31 $341
Committee
1.3 1 x meeting with Council 2 2 $310 $31 $341
Total Staff Hours 1 6 7 $1,150 $115 $1,265
TASK 2 Formulation of Study
2.1 Determine Key Stakeholders 3 3 $465 $47 $512
2.2 Identify Study goals and 2 4 6 $1,060 $106 $1,166
objectives
Total Staff Hours 2 7 9 $1,525 $153 $1,678
TASK 3 Background Research
3.1 Site inspection (3 days) 10 14 24 $4,370 $437 $4.807
3.2 Literature review 8 8 $1,240 $124 $1,364
3.3 Consultation with key
25 25 $3,875 $388 $4,263
stakeholders and
documentation (assume 5 x
5 hr meetings)
3.4 Economic impacts 5 5 $775 $78 $853
3.5 Financial implications 5 5 $775 $78 $853
3.6 Mapping 20 20 $1,800 $180 $1,980
Total Staff Hours 10 57 20 87 $12,835 $1,284 $14,119
TASK 4 Preparation of Draft Strategy
4.1 Prepare draft strategy 6 38 15 59 $8,580 $856 $9,416
document
Total Staff Hours 6 38 15 59 $8,580 $856 $9,416
TASK 5 Public Consultation
5.1 Open Day (1 day) 16 5 21 $2,930 $293 $3,223
Total Staff Hours 16 5 21 $2,930 $293 $3,223

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 20
Company Taylor Burrell Barnett
Hourly Rate $220 $155 $90
Lex
Barnett
Karen
Wright
Drafting
Total
Task
Hours
Cost
GST
Total
Fees
Inc
GST
TASK 6 Prepare Final Strategy
6.1 Consider submissions 3 10 13 $2,210 $2221 $2,431
(assumes max 10 at one
hour per submission)
6.2 Prepare strategy (assume no 8 6 10 24 $3,590 $359 $3,949
major modifications)
Total Staff Hours 11 16 10 37 $5,800 $580 $6,380
TASK 7 Prepare Recommended Implementation
7.1 Recommendations for 2 8 10 $1,680 $168 $1,848
Scheme Amendment
7.2 Recommendation for Policy 2 8 10 $1,680 $168 $1,848
Total Staff Hours 4 16 20 $3,360 $336 $3,696
TASK 8 Project Administration
8.1 Bi-monthly Steering
14 14 $2,170 $217 $2,387
Committee Meetings in Shark
Bay (max 2 meetings)
8.2 Bi-monthly teleconference 4 4 $620 $62 $682
Total Staff Hours 18 18 $2,790 $279 $3,069
SUMMARY OF STAFF HOURS
TASK 1 Project Inception 1 6 7
TASK 2 Formulation of Study 2 7 9
TASK 3 Background Research 10 57 20 87
TASK 4 Preparation of Draft Strategy 6 38 15 59
TASK 5 Public Consultation 16 5 21
TASK 6 Prepare Final Strategy 11 16 10 37
TASK 7 Prepare Recommended 4 16 20
Implementation
TASK 8 Project Administration 18 18
Total Staff Hours 34 174 50 258
SUMMARY OF PROFESSIONAL FEES
TASK 1 Project Inception $220 $930 $1,150 $115 $1,265
TASK 2 Formulation of Study $440 $1,085 $1,525 $153 $1,678
TASK 3 Background Research $2,200 $8,835 $1,800 $12,835 $1,284 $14,119
TASK 4 Preparation of Draft Strategy $1,320 $5,890 $1,350 $8,560 $856 $8,416
TASK 5 Public Consultation $2,480 $450 $2,930 $293 $3,223
TASK 6 Prepare Final Strategy $2,420 $2,480 $900 $5,800 $580 $6,380
TASK 7 Prepare Recommended $880 $2,480 $3,360 $336 $3,696
Implementation
TASK 8 Project Administration $2,790 $2,790 $279 $3,069
Total Professional Fees $7,480 $26,970 $4,500 $38,950 $3,895 $42,845
DISBURSEMENTS
1 Plan prints, couriers, etc
$12,000 $1,200 $13,200
(does not include airfares
and accommodation
Total of Disbursements $12,000 $1,200 $13,200
TOTAL COST $50,950 $5,095 $56,045
Comment
Given the importance of tourism to the Shire of Shark Bay I believe the guidelines highlight
the significance of a Local Tourism Planning Strategy and the many benefits that it would
have as a development control document in the planning approval process. It would ensure
that potential tourist developers thoughtfully consider approval requirements or Scheme
Amendments. The potential outcome would be quality and sustainable tourism
development within the Shire.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 21
While a Local Tourism Planning Strategy would have many benefits in tourism development
approval processes, the cost to prepare the document as identified in the Fee Proposal from
Taylor Burrell Barnett is significant and one that could not be funded solely by the Shire.
Legal Implications
Shire of Shark Bay Town Planning Scheme No 2 (as amended).
Policy Implications
Local Tourism Planning Strategy would be adopted by Council as a Policy pursuant to the
Shire's Town Planning Scheme.
Financial Implications
The Fee Proposal to prepare a Local Tourism Planning Strategy will be referred to the
Shire's draft 2007/08 budget considerations.
Strategic Implications
A Local Tourism Planning Strategy would be an important document for the future tourism
development planning within the Shire.
Recommendation
That Council recognise the importance of the preparation of a Local Tourism
Planning Strategy by -
1 Referring the sum of $10,000 to its draft 2007/08 budget as seed funding for the
preparation of a Local Tourism Planning Strategy.
2 Seeking other avenues of funding/technical assistance to complete a Local
Tourism Planning Strategy.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 14 May 2007
Moved Cr Cane
Seconded Cr Blennerhassett
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
11.2 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 14/2007 - FACTORY/WORKSHOP 65 (LOT 325) P1518
VLAMINGH CRESCENT, DENHAM - D AND M GRAHAM
Author
Manager Regulatory Services
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil.
Précis
D and M Graham have submitted an application for the development of a factory/workshop
on 65 (Lot 325) Vlamingh Crescent, Denham. This report considers the application and
recommends conditional approval in accordance with the Shire of Shark Bay's Town
Planning Scheme No 2 (as amended).
Background
The development of a factory/workshop in the industrial area is a permitted use if developed
in accordance with the requirements of the Shire of Shark Bay's Town Planning Scheme No
2 (as amended).

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 22
Comment
The continuing development of service infrastructure in the industrial area is a good sign of
economic growth.
Legal Implications
Shire of Shark Bay Town Planning Scheme No 2 (as amended).
Policy Implications
Policy 5.7 Caretaker's Dwellings in Industrial Areas.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Strategic Implications
The location of capital infrastructure service facilities into industrial zoned land is the
ultimate objective of all Town Planning Schemes.
Recommendation
That Council grant conditional approval to the proponents of Development
Application 14/2007, D and M Graham, to develop a factory/workshop on 65 (Lot 325)
Vlamingh Crescent, Denham, subject to -
1 To be used for the purpose of a Factory/Workshop.
2 To be developed in accordance with the endorsed plan.
3 Compliance in all respects with the Building Regulations 1989 (as amended).
Two sets of working drawings and specifications are required to be submitted
with the building application.
4 The layout of the site and the size of the proposed buildings and works shown
on the endorsed plan shall not be altered for any reason without the consent of
the Shire's Planning Officer.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 23
5 The consent of Council being sought and obtained prior to any change of use
of the premises.
6 All exterior metal cladding, including the roof, shall be of patent pre-treated
finish, such as Colorbond, to the satisfaction of the Shire's Planning Officer.
7 Four parking spaces, each 2.6 x 5.5 metres, to be provided with adequate and
approval access.
8 The use hereby permitted shall comply with the definition of factory/workshop
and caretaker's residence as contained in the Shire of Shark Bay's Town
Planning Scheme No 2 (as amended).
9 No advertising sign shall be erected without the further approval of the Shire of
Shark Bay.
10 All landscaping and site works to be completed prior to the occupation of the
premises.
11 Compliance with all aspects of the Health Act 1911 (as amended).
12 Compliance with Council's Trade Waste Disposal requirements.
13 The provision of trade waste storage facilities to a design approved by Council.
14 The driveways, crossings and parking areas shall be constructed, sealed and
drained in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the Shire's
Engineering Officer.
15 Off-street car parking for a minimum of four vehicles to be provided on a
hardstand and drained surface to the satisfaction of Council.
16 Ingress and egress of vehicles to be carried out within the confines of the
property.
17 Vehicle access driveways to be hardstand and drained to the satisfaction of
Council.
18 The loading and off-loading of vehicles to be carried out within the confines of
the property.
19 Access to the site from Vlamingh Crescent to be constructed to the satisfaction
of the Shire's Planning Officer.
20 Off-street parking to be provided for employees' vehicles.
21 Gardens to be retained and maintained in a neat condition where practicable.
22 An application to be made for any signs proposed to be erected on the site.
23 Application to be made for the proposed erection of any sign on the property
and such signs are not to exceed 0.1 square metres in area.
24 Fencing of the site to be carried out to the Shire Building Surveyor's
satisfaction.
25 Design and materials used in the building and fencing to be to the satisfaction
of the Shire's Planning Officer and Building Surveyor.
26 Arrangements satisfactory to the Shire's Engineering Officer to be made for the
storage and collection of garbage container.
This approval is valid for 2 years from the date of approval. All conditions of
approval are required to be met within this time period.
Note - Failure to complete conditions of approval or commencement of development
within the 2 year approval period will result in the approval becoming invalid and a
new application will be required to be lodged.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 24
Date of Report 14 May 2007
Moved Cr Cane
Seconded Cr Crawford
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
11.3 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 15/2007 - BUILDING SETBACK VARIATION 77 (LOT 115) P 1089
HUGHES STREET - D AND M ROCK
Author
Manager Regulatory Services
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil.
Précis
D and M Rock, 77 Hughes Street, Denham, have submitted Development Application
15/2007 which requests Council approval to construct a free standing carport within the front
setback of 77 (Lot 115) Hughes Street, Denham. While a carport, with Council approval,
can be permitted within a front setback location, this particular application seeks to infill the
southern facing wall of the carport which identifies it as a pseudo garage, which is contrary
to the Residential Design Codes.
This report considers variable circumstances which may allow Council to grant conditional
approval to this application.
Background

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 25
Comment
When considering variables to primary street setbacks the most important criteria for
assessment relates to -
* Visual impact on the streetscape.
* Possible impact on adjoining properties.
* Evaluation of each application based upon the merits or otherwise of each individual
application to avoid setting unwarranted precedents.
While this application, because of its brick southern wall, has to be assessed as a garage
and is therefore contrary to the Residential Design Codes, its location in Hughes Street has
an exceptionally wide road reserve. The lot has a frontage of 28.0 metres and the dwelling
is double storey, hence the impacts of this proposal could be considered as complimentary
to the streetscape, with no impact on adjoining properties and with the merit of providing
screening for the occupant's vehicles.
However I believe that if this proposal/application is approved it should be conditional upon
streetscape values being preserved or enhanced. This could be achieved by having the
southern brick wall a mix of construction materials rather than face brickwork.
Legal Implications
Shire of Shark Bay Town Planning Scheme No 2 (as amended).
Residential Design Codes of WA.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Strategic Implications
Careful consideration of streetscape values have important long term economic benefits for
the community.
Recommendation
That Council advise the proponents D and M Rock, 77 Hughes Street, Denham, that
Development Application 15/2007 for a building setback variation is conditionally
approved subject to -

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 26
1 The submission and approval of a building licence for the construction of a
carport/garage on 77 (Lot 115) Hughes Street, Denham.
2 The southern brick wall being a mix of construction materials other than face
brickwork.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 21 May 2007
Moved Cr Blennerhassett
Seconded Cr Hoult
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
11.4 SUBDIVISIONAL PROPOSAL - LOT 1 EDEL LOCATION NANGA ROAD, NANGA P2037
Author
Manager Regulatory Services
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil.
Précis
HTD Surveyors and Planners have submitted an application for preliminary approval of
support for a proposed subdivision of Part Lot 1 Nanga on behalf of proponent Mr T Sears.
This report considers the application and recommends that it not be supported.
Background
In support of its submission the following information has been provided.
Proposed Subdivision - Lot 1 Edel Location Nanga Road, Nanga
In September 2006, based on the advice from the Shire's Town Planning Department, the WA
Planning Commission resolved to refuse an application for the excision of 6,884 square metres from
the abovementioned property, for the following reasons -
1 The proposed subdivision is inconsistent with the "Special Use - Tourist Development"
zoning of the land in the Council's Town Planning Scheme. Subdivision in the manner
proposed would create potential for additional building development which would be in
conflict with the zoning objectives.
2 The Commission is not prepared to approve a subdivision for residential purposes only in an
area zoned for tourist development, as it is contrary to the Town Planning Scheme and will
conflict with the intent and purpose of the zone.
3 Approval to the subdivision would set an undesirable precedent for the further subdivision of
surrounding lots.
ADVICE TO APPLICANT
1 The permitted uses in respect to this site are tourist development (including caravan parks),
chalet development, holiday cottages, museums, residences and any other uses that Council
considers to be ancillary and incidental to the approved predominant use and are consistent
with the objectives of the Shire of Shark Bay Town Planning Scheme No 2.
It appears that the reasons for the refusal are contradictory, in that the Shire's Town Planner and the
Commission were not prepared to approve a subdivision for residential purposes only in an area
zoned for tourist development as it is contrary to the TPS & will conflict with the intent & purpose
of the zone, however, in the advice to the applicant it is clearly stated that under the Town Planning
Scheme "residences and any other uses that Council considers to be ancillary & incidental to the
approval predominant use" as permitted uses.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 27
The purpose of the application was to allow the landowner to remain in the area, whilst selling the
main portion of the property for a larger commercial tourist venture such as chalets & holiday
cottages, whilst developing the 6,884 square metre as a unique small scale boutique eco-tourism
venture.
The principal aim of the proposed venture is to appeal to those tourists that love the outdoors whilst
note being the "camping type". The proposed building/s will use the basic types of eco principles
such as -
• solar power
• solar passive design
• use of plantation and recycled timbers
• building location and footprint to ensure minimal impact on the land
• reduced and minimised use of chemicals & PVC products
• low energy and water saving appliances & fittings
• protection & promotion of indigenous flora & fauna
The intended venture will draw information and be based on other eco home/resort type ventures in
Australia, including "Coco Eco Resort - Broome", "Ningaloo Reef Retreat", and "Kooljarman - Cape
Leveque".
The owners' intentions however will be most similar (although smaller scale) to that of the "Coco
Eco Resort" which is a Bed & Breakfast nature retreat.
Each of the above uses however utilise the basic principles as listed above, whilst still remaining
individual due to their unique locations.
Shark Bay is promoted as a "World Heritage" area, yet there are no examples of this type of venture
available in the immediate area.
There are a number of architects in the state and across the country that specialise in this type of
development, and most will push for the acknowledgement of regionally responsive design, hence
designs for locations will differ depending on their environmental factors such as wind, sunlight,
native vegetation, general climate, etc.
The owner envisages that the design of the house will utilise any cooling ocean breezes, have ceiling
fans, be solar oriented and promote a quiet relaxed setting in a natural environment.
The building will be elevated and oriented to make the most of any cooling breezes and enjoy
panoramic views and a visual connection to the tidal bay & ocean beyond.
The building form will be a direct response to the climatic conditions and environmental qualities of
the site, with roof forms that can act as "wind scoops" directing available breezes to within the
buildings during summer. It is noted however that the area also experiences very strong winds,
therefore the building design will also factor this into its design with one possible solution being the
use of slatted timber panels to buffer the wind whilst still allowing a ventilation flow, and some solar
penetration for lighting. Wherever possible the building will be reliant on passive thermal design to
assist with energy efficiency. The owner will be committed to the use of alternative energy
production wherever possible with aims of possibly running the whole building on solar power with
an emergency generator backup. Energy consumption will be carefully considered with the use of
energy efficient appliances & fixtures.
Other Eco Resorts and dwellings around Australia & Globally for that matter tend to focus &
market themselves based on the natural environment, and the kind of "escape" aspect of the location.
Given this, the owner has also recognised that he will have to not only commit to the basic eco
principles but it will also be very important for the area to be revegetated and for the land to reflect
its original natural state.
The intended use will be able to market itself as an alternative accommodation form in the region that
will attract like minded tourists to the area. It will also be in a position to raise awareness of
sustainable building/development and tourism in the region.
Given that the above proposal will be an extremely costly exercise, the landowner obviously requires
some assurances that this proposal can and will be supported. The purpose of the subdivision is to
ensure that this venture can and will be treated as a completely separate operation to that which
currently exists on the subject land.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 28
The landowner has however also indicated that while it is his intention to establish an eco based
venture on the proposed lot, that if after full investigation this does not prove successful or viable, he
will continue with the existing boat hire business as an alternative, but with it separated from the
existing chalet & holiday accommodation uses on the subject land.
The separation of the two types of businesses will also require the preliminary approval of Council to
subdivide the land so that each different type of tourist venture can be owned and operated by
separate parties, and that if either one wishes to expand or diversify they can do so on an individual
basis.
The separation of the two types of businesses will also allow the landowner to remain in the vicinity,
and operate one business only, whilst being able to sell the other to operate independently, rather
than trying to operate two separate types of business himself or on the same land holding.
The purpose of this proposal is to therefore seek preliminary approval from Council that a reapplication
for subdivision would be supported to allow the owner to pursue the establishment of a
purpose built eco bed & breakfast homestead on the newly created lot, whilst the existing chalets and
other commercial tourist ventures will be sold and operated separately. Or alternatively allowing the
landowner to pursue the boat hire business as a separate venture to the chalet/holiday
accommodation use.
If you have any queries or require any further information please do not hesitate to contact this office.
Comment
Lot 1 Nanga is zoned Special Use under the current Town Planning Scheme which identifies
and permits a number of potential tourist uses. Many types of tourist uses could be
considered provided the proposed development was well thought out and sustainable with
the end use being short stay. Residential development is not permitted unless it is ancillary
to the predominant use, being tourism.
In this instance the applicant has misinterpreted the provisions and intent of the Scheme in
which residences may be considered by Council if they are ancillary or incidental to the

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 29
approved predominant use, which is tourist development. An example of an ancillary or
incidental residential use in this instance would be a manager or caretaker's residence.
Small scale subdivisions in this location should also be discouraged as there are no service
provisions such as water, power, sewerage, rubbish and/or other amenities. Points 1-3
identified in the applicant's submission as reason for the initial subdivision refusal remain
relevant.
The clarity of definitions within the Shire of Shark Bay Town Planning Scheme No 2 (as
amended) in relation to the Special Use provisions for Nanga have been improved within
Town Planning Scheme No 3 and having a Local Tourism Planning Strategy would also be
most beneficial to both potential developers and Council in this regard.
Legal Implications
Shire of Shark Bay Town Planning Scheme No 2 (as amended).
Policy Implications
Local Tourism Planning Strategy would be adopted by Council as a Policy pursuant to its
Town Planning Scheme.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Strategic Implications
Small scale subdivisions in rural areas are not recommended as small Shire's have no
financial ability to provide services.
Recommendation
That Council advise HTD Surveyors and Planners that Council will not provide
support for the proposed subdivision of Lot 1 Edel Location Nanga as it is
inconsistent with the Special Use - Tourist Development zoning of the land under the
provisions of the Shire of Shark Bay Town Planning Scheme No 2 (as amended).
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 14 May 2007
Moved Cr Crawford
Seconded Cr Hoult
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
11.5 OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PART NORTH LOCATION 59 - DENHAM ROAD TO 111
Author
Manager Regulatory Services
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil.
Précis
At its Ordinary meeting held on 28 February 2007 at Item 11.1 the Shark Bay Shire Council
considered an Outline Development Plan for part North Location 59 Denham Road and
resolved -
That Council advise Dykstra Planning, on behalf of the proponent Sigma Syon Pty Ltd that it
is prepared to conditionally approve the proposed Outline Development Plan, Part North

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 30
Location 59 Denham Road, Denham, for the purpose of referral and advertising subject to
satisfactory agreement/approval and/or further information being obtained/provided and
resolved to the satisfaction of Council during the course of the advertising period relative to
the issues identified hereunder -
1 Footpaths and Dual Use paths not identified on the plan or possible options, for
linkages to Shire's current infrastructure.
2 Landscaping/Verge treatment not addressed in the plan.
3 Further information is required on the positioning and aesthetic treatment of
stormwater compensation basins.
4 Proposed and future road interfaces for this development and potential future
development in this location requires careful consideration and also endorsement
from Main Road WA.
5 Consideration also needs to be given to what type of Tourist activity may be possible
on the designated tourist sites and for the need to now, through the Outline
Development Plan process identify future access and egress points as part of a
collective road interface overview that can be endorsed.
6 Barrier retaining walls need to be better identified with reference to construction
material, height relativities to Monkey Mia Road and as separation between
Tourist/Residential development.
7 Council need to agree to accept Cash in Lieu of Public Open Space Provision and
identify where that income would be directed and on what it would be expended as is
required when agreeing to accept same.
8 The Water Corporation in its submission to Town Planning Scheme No. 3 has
identified the need for a 100 metre buffer between a residential development and its
Water Treatment Plant. This is an issue that will have to progress to satisfactory
resolution through the advertising process.
9. That Council will allow the Outline Development Plan/Subdivision to progress
concurrently with the progress of the finalisation of Town Planning Scheme No. 3 and
its intent for Special Use Zone 3 contained within Schedule 4 but with the proviso that
a Scheme Amendment may have to be initiated if there are unforseen delays to the
finalisation of Town Planning Scheme No. 3.
This report now addresses the resolve of the above Council recommendation, considers
any submissions received after the closure of the advertising period, and recommends
conditional approval to allow the development to progress to the subdivision stage.
Background
At the close of the advertising period, being 4.00 pm 18 May 2007, no comments/
submissions had been received in relation to the Outline Development Plan.
Written confirmation has been received from the Water Corporation advising that its
treatment plant will not be an impact on the proposed development.
The following preliminary comments have been received from a traffic management
consultant regarding the Outline Development Plan -
• The intersection spaces of approximately 140 metres along Denham-Hamelin Road [Denham
Road] (from Peron Road [Monkey Mia Road]to the proposed subdivision road) is probably
acceptable (with the assumption that speed zoning can be modified if necessary).
• However, it is not recommended to provide another intersection to the south in between these
2 junctions. The road to the south would have to be opposite the road to the north, with a
roundabout at the 4-way intersection.
• It may be necessary to remove the proposed crossover for the 4,000 square metre Tourist
Accommodation site off Denham-Hamelin Road [Denham Road] (although this will depend
on the level of traffic generation).

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 31
All other issues are addressed within the resubmitted Outline Development Plan hereunder -
MONKEY
MIA ROAD
SHARK BAY
ROAD
DENHAM ROAD
Comment
While there remain a number of issues that will require further consideration and detail I
believe that sufficient information has been provided to allow the development to proceed to
the next stage, being subdivision.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 32
Legal Implications
Shire of Shark Bay Town Planning Scheme No 2 (as amended) and Town Planning Scheme
No 3 (as proposed).
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Strategic Implications
The proposal of another residential subdivision in the area is a good indicator of economic
confidence in the Shire.
Recommendation
That Council advise Dykstra Planning on behalf of the proponent Sigma Syon Pty Ltd
that it is prepared to endorse the principles and objectives proposed in the Outline
Development Plan for Part North Location 59 Denham Road, Denham, and will
accordingly advise the Western Australian Planning Commission of its support.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 17 May 2007
Moved Cr Cane
Seconded Cr Blennerhassett
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
11.6 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES - STELLA ROWLEY DRIVE TO 111
SUBDIVISION
Author
Manager Regulatory Services
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil.
Précis
LandCorp engaged planning consultants Taylor Burrell Barnett to prepare Residential
Development Design Guidelines for stages 1-3 of its subdivision at Stella Rowley Drive,
Denham. Incorporated into this report is a copy of the Residential Development Design
Guidelines which detail mandatory and non mandatory requirements for all residential
development proposed for Stella Rowley Drive.
This report recommends that Council endorse the Residential Development Design
Guidelines for the purpose of advertising with the view of final adoption of the Residential
Development Design Guidelines as a Council Policy pursuant to the Shire of Shark Bay
Town Planning Scheme.
Background
Design Guidelines - Stella Rowley Road Subdivision, Denham - May 2007 - attached

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 33
Comment
While the adoption and implementation of Residential Development Design Guidelines are a
positive way to improve the overall quality and standard of new residential subdivisions, I
am, at this stage, not convinced that the implementation of the guidelines via the processes
and procedures outlined will be readily achievable. The concerns I have relate to the
processes for initial building approval to be obtained and the contractual arrangements for
the compliance of the mandatory building requirements by LandCorp.
Legal Implications
Shire of Shark Bay Town Planning Scheme No 2 (as amended).
Policy Implications
The Residential Development Design Guidelines will be adopted as a Council Policy per se.
Financial Implications
Unknown additional staff resource requirement required to assess development approval
conditions.
Strategic Implications
The end result will be better quality subdivisions and development of residential housing.
Recommendation
That Council endorse the Residential Development Design Guidelines and the
Guidelines be advertised for a period of 28 days to allow Public Comment/
Submissions prior to consideration of final adoption as Council Policy.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 17 May 2007
Moved Cr Crawford
Seconded Cr Blennerhassett
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
12.0 BUILDING REPORT
Nil.
13.0 HEALTH REPORT
Nil.
14.0 REPORTS BY STAFF
14.1 COUNCILLORS' QUESTION TIME TO MANAGER REGULATORY SERVICES
STELLA ROWLEY DRIVE SUBDIVISION STREET NAMES
The Manager Regulatory Services stated that LandCorp had insufficient background
information for the most recent names suggested so those names previously decided by
Council would be utilised.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 34
15.0 WORKS REPORT
15.1 WORKS COMMITTEE
15.1.1 WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES 27 FEBRUARY 2007
The following minutes of the Works Committee meeting held on 27 February 2007 were
confirmed at the Works Committee meeting held on 29 May 2007.
Minutes of the meeting of the Works Committee held in the Meeting Room in the
Shire Offices on Tuesday 27 February 2007
WC 1.0
WC 2.0
WC 3.0
DECLARATION OF OPENING
The Chairperson declared the meeting open at 7.05 pm.
RECORD OF ATTENDANCES/APOLOGIES/LEAVE OF ABSENCE GRANTED
Attendances Cr H J Crawford Chairperson
Cr B W Cane
Cr D O Hoult
Mr K J Matthews Chief Executive Officer
Mr G W Brown Works Supervisor
Apologies
Mr B J Galvin
Mr S Kocian
Nil
PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
Town Supervisor
Finance and Administration Manager/
Minute Clerk
The public question time commenced at 7.05 pm. There being no public present
the public question time ceased at 7.05 pm.
WC 4.0
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
WC 4.1 Confirmation of the Minutes of the Works Committee meeting held on Tuesday 28
November 2006.
Recommendation
That the minutes of the Works Committee meeting held on 28 November
2006, as circulated to all Committee members, be confirmed as a true and
accurate record.
Moved Cr D Hoult
Seconded Cr B Cane
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
WC 5.0
WC 5.1
REPORTS
Works Supervisor Report
Author
Works Supervisor
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Roadworks
Odene Road works have been completed with works starting on Useless Loop
Road on 19 February 2007.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 35
With these works starting S & SL Guthrie Earthmoving Contractors (WA) Pty Ltd
has not been able to stockpile road building material due to mechanical problems
with its bulldozer. This will cause some delay to the works schedule. We have
been able to obtain another contractor to proceed with the stockpiling but will not
be able to commence until 19 February 2007. Within 3 days we should have
enough material stockpiles to enable carting to commence. An extra truck has
also been hired to start at same time to tow the Shire's water tanker with S & SL
Guthrie Earthmoving Contractors (WA) Pty Ltd supplying a truck side tipper and
water tanker as required.
Edge patching will start on Monkey Mia Road on 20 February 2007, with work on
Shark Bay Road as well. This should have a duration of between 4-6 weeks.
Set up of Tamala camp for next year will take approximately 3 days as work has
also been completed on the sleeping vans.
Town Maintenance
Town Maintenance has continued with watering of lawns during windy times.
Some problem times and frequency of watering is to be changed to attempt to
limit the effects these conditions have to the watering.
Plant Maintenance
Maintenance of plant has been ongoing during the last 6 weeks, with work done
on the grader and Volvo loader having to be done out of town.
Recommendation
That the information be received.
Date of Report 19 February 2007
Moved Cr Cane
Seconded B Galvin
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
WC 6.0
WORKS REPORTS
WC 6.1 Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre - Front Gardens BU 106.03
Author
Works Supervisor
Disclosure of any Interest
Nil
Background
Request from January 2007 Council meeting to provide ideas for gardens in front
of the Centre.
Comment
Some discussion at Works Committee with ideas of cost efficient and economical
way for improvement to this area. The well area was also included in previous
discussions to beautify with safety provisions to be put in place for the public.
Legal Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 36
Strategic Implications
Nil.
Recommendation
That the Works Committee recommend to Council that Council -
1 Replace the buffel grass with native shrubs, ground cover and additional
paving around the flag pole and front windows.
2 As a temporary measure cover and decommission the well, landscape
the area around the well and provide a bike rack.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 19 February 2007
Moved Cr B Cane
Seconded Cr D Hoult
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
WC 6.2 Disabled Parking Bays DI 100 RO 106
Author
Works Supervisor
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Background
Request from January 2007 Council meeting for extra Disabled Parking Bay
outside Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre, Knight Terrace, Denham.
Comment
An email sent to Terri Tonkin of Main Roads WA in Carnarvon advising of
Council's intention to have a disabled parking bay located in front of the Shark
Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre. Advice was received back that Knight
Terrace is a Shire road with parking bays being the responsibility of the Shire.
Requirements for a Disabled Parking Bay immediately east of the current loading
zone in front of the Discovery Centre require alterations to the kerbing, signage
and line marking to accommodate the legislative specifications of an additional
Disabled Parking Bay.
Line marking is to be done on Shark Bay Road after reseals. This crew will be
requested to also line mark streets in town site of Denham. Some areas MRWA
is accountable for, while others the Shire of Shark Bay will be accountable for.
Contact has been made to line marking company by the Works Supervisor
requesting costs.
Legal Implications
Nil
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil
Strategic Implications
Nil

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 37
Recommendation
That the Works Committee recommends to Council that Council not make a
decision with regards to the installation of a disabled parking bay area on
Knight Terrace immediately east of the current loading zone, until the full
cost of doing so is determined for possible inclusion in the 2007/2008
budget.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 19 February 2007
Moved Cr D Hoult
Seconded K Matthews
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
WC 6.3 Tender 2006/07-03 Depot Shed TE 115.11
Author
Works Supervisor
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Background
Tenders were advertised in January/February 2007 for the purchase and
construction of a shed at the Shire Depot, Dampier Road, Denham. The budget
allowance in the 2006/2007 budget is $75,000.
Comment
The evaluation of tenders should include, but is not limited to, consideration of -
• Value for money.
• Price compared to budgeted cost.
• Conformity with tender documents.
• Previous contractor performance reports.
• Safety records and other organisation factors.
• Technical, management, physical and financial resources.
• Regard for Council Policy 10.6 ‘Local Goods and Services’.
Tenders were received from 2 companies, being:
John Famlonga Depot Shed Colorbond $70,108 inc GST
Koolinda Way Depot Shed Zincalume Roof $69,168 inc GST
Exmouth WA 6707
Mobile 041 792 4742
Paul Mason Depot Shed Colorbond $54,300 + GST
177 Marine Terrace
Busselton WA 6280
Phone/Fax 08 9752 3070
Both tenders received fall within the budget of $75,000 (exclusive of GST).
The tender received from John Famlonga is for the type of shed that it
constructed in Exmouth and conforms to the higher ratings that are required for
such structures in Exmouth. The Shed design also includes four rollers for the
door.
The tender received from Paul Mason conforms to Category 2, Region C
specifications. The Shed design includes two rollers for the door.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 38
It is recommended that the tender from John Famlonga, despite being $10,778
(inc GST) dearer, be accepted. The reasons being that John Famlonga has a
proven track record for constructing sheds which can withstand the weather
conditions in the region. Also John Famlonga’s tender includes a shed with 4
rollers for the door, whilst Paul Mason’s tender is for a shed with only 2 rollers for
the door, which means that the shed with 4 rollers for the door will have greater
structural strength to hold the door up.
Legal Implications
Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996, Part 4, reg. 18
Policy Implications
Shire of Shark Bay Code of Tendering
Financial Implications
2006-07 Budget Allocation at $75,000
Strategic Implications
Nil
Recommendation
That the Works Committee recommends to Council that Council award
Tender No 2006/07-03 Supply and Construction of Shed at the Shire Depot -
Dampier Road Denham, to John Famlonga from Exmouth for a total cost of
$70,108 inc.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 19 February 2007
Moved Cr B Cane
Seconded B Galvin
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
WC 7.0 INFORMAL DISCUSSION
WC 7.1 Temporary Access Road to Monkey Mia Jetty
WC 7.2 Regional Road Group Meeting in Carnarvon - 26 March 2007
WC 7.3 Reinstatement of Woodleigh-Byro Road by Alinta Gas
WC 7.4 Restoration of Stone Carved by Captain H M Denham
WC 7.5 Progress of Plaques for 40 Mile and Hamelin Tanks
WC 7.6 New School - Footpath along Stella Rowley Drive and Access Carpark
WC 7.7 Progress of Installation of Stock Signs Along Useless Loop Road
WC 8.0
WC 9.0
WC 9.1
URGENT BUSINESS APPROVED BY THE PERSON PRESIDING OR BY
DECISION
Nil
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting of the Works Committee will be held in the Shire office meeting
room on Tuesday 27 March 2007 at 7.00 pm.
WC 10.0 CLOSE
The meeting closed at 8.41 pm.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 39
15.1.2 WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING 29 MAY 2007
A meeting was held on 29 May 2007 and the recommendations follow.
Recommendations of the meeting of the Works Committee held in the Meeting Room
in the Shire Offices on Tuesday 29 May 2007
WC 1.0
WC 2.0
WC 3.0
DECLARATION OF OPENING
The Chairperson declared the meeting open at 7.08 pm.
RECORD OF ATTENDANCES/APOLOGIES/LEAVE OF ABSENCE GRANTED
Attendances Cr H J Crawford Chairperson
Cr B W Cane
Cr R W Eddington
Mr K J Matthews Chief Executive Officer
Mr G W Brown Works Supervisor
Mr S Kocian Finance and Administration Manager/Minute Clerk
Apologies
Cr D O Hoult
Mr B J Galvin
PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
Town Supervisor
The public question time commenced at 7.08 pm. There being no public present
the public question time ceased at 7.08 pm.
WC 4.0
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
WC 4.1 Confirmation of the Minutes of the Works Committee meeting held on Tuesday 27
February 2007.
Recommendation
That the minutes of the Works Committee meeting held on 27 February
2007, as circulated to all Committee members, be confirmed as a true and
accurate record.
Moved Cr Cane
Seconded Mr Matthews
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
WC 5.0
WC 5.1
REPORTS
Works Supervisor Report
Recommendation
That the information be received.
Date of Report 21 May 2007
Moved Cr Eddington
Seconded Cr Cane
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
WC 6.0
WORKS REPORTS
WC 6.1 Quotation No 2006/07-Q05 -Manager Regulatory Services' Vehicle TE 111.01
Changeover
Recommendation
That the Works Committee recommend to Council that Council award
Quotation No 2006/07-Q05 to Langer Autos Geraldton for the supply of a

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 40
Ford falcon XT Wagon at a changeover refund price of $350 including GST
and licensing costs.
Date of Report 21 May 2007
Moved Cr Cane
Seconded Cr Eddington
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
WC 6.2 Ranger Service DO 101 CA 130 LO 101 LL 111
Recommendation
That the Works Committee recommends to Council that Council engage the
services of the Shire of Carnarvon Ranger on a basis of four days per
month at a costs of $1,954.00 per month and that this appointment be
advertised in the “Government Gazette”.
Date of Report 22 May 2007
Moved Cr Eddington
Seconded Cr Crawford
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
WC 7.0
WC 7.1
WC 7.2
WC 7.3
WC 7.4
WC 8.0
WC 8.1
INFORMAL DISCUSSION
Reinstatement of Woodleigh-Byro Road by Saipem
Department of Environment and Conservation and Gunson Resources
Rubbish Tip
Condition of Useless Loop Road
URGENT BUSINESS APPROVED BY THE PERSON PRESIDING OR BY
DECISION
Surplus Items for Sale - Expression of Interest No 2006/07-EO1
Expressions of interest for the sale of surplus items currently stored at the depot
but no longer required by the Shire closed at 4.00 pm on Friday 25 May 2007. A
total of 8 bids were received for the various items.
Moved Cr Eddington
Seconded Cr Cane
That the Works Committee recommend to Council that Council accept the
following bids for Expression of Interest No 2006/07-E01, as these bids
where the highest bids received for each lot number -
1 Tamala Station - $1,650 (GST inc) for Lot No 1 Lincoln Welder.
2 Brian Vietch - $160 (GST inc) for Lot No 2 Lincoln Welder.
3 Ralph Dodson - $700 (GST inc) for Lot No 3 Two Second Hand Spa
Tubs.
4 Tamala Station - $220 (GST inc) for Lot No 4 One Second Hand 6 x 4
Trailer.
5 Martin Grenside - $25 (GST inc) for Lot No 5 Assorted Second Hand
Computer Hardware.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 41
WC 9.0
WC 9.1
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting of the Works Committee will be held in the Shire office meeting
room on Tuesday 26 June 2007 at 7.00 pm.
WC 10.0 CLOSE
Recommendation
The meeting closed at 8.07 pm.
1 That the confirmed minutes of the Works Committee meeting held on 27
February 2007 be received.
2 That recommendations WC 5.1 to WC 6.2 of the Works Committee meeting held
on 29 May 2007 be adopted.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 21 May 2007
Moved Cr Crawford
Seconded Cr Cane
1 That the confirmed minutes of the Works Committee meeting held on 27
February 2007 be received.
2 That recommendations WC 5.1 to WC 6.2 and WC 8.1 of the Works Committee
meeting held on 29 May 2007 be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
16.0 TOURISM, RECREATION AND CULTURE REPORT
16.1 DENHAM MARINE FACILITIES MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
16.1.1 DENHAM MARINE FACILITIES MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES MA 100.01
1 DECEMBER 2006
The following minutes of the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee meeting
held on 1 December 2006 were confirmed at the Denham Marine Facilities Management
Committee meeting held on 8 May 2007.
Minutes of the Meeting of the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee held
in the Meeting Room in the Council Chambers on 1 December 2006
MF 1.0
MF 2.0
DECLARATION OF OPENING
In the absence of the President the Deputy President chaired the meeting. The
Deputy President declared the meeting open at 11.01 am.
RECORD OF ATTENDANCES/APOLOGIES/LEAVE OF ABSENCE GRANTED
Attendances Cr R W Eddington Deputy President
Cr D O Hoult
Mr K J Matthews Chief Executive Officer
Mr G Ridgley
Mr J McLaughlin
Mr G Brown
Mrs R J Mettam Minute Clerk
Visitor Mr Nich Grundy Assistant Manager Regional Facilities
Department for Planning and Infrastructure
Mr David Skene Department for Planning and Infrastructure

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 42
Leave of Absence
Mr Aidan Tansey
Cr M C Hipper
Apologies Cr L R Moss President
Regional Services Manager Carnarvon
Department for Planning and Infrastructure
MF 3.0
MF 4.0
MF 4.1
PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
The public question time commenced at 11.02 am. There being no public present
the public question time closed at 11.02 am.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
Confirmation of the Minutes of the Denham Marine Facilities Management
Committee meeting held on Wednesday 5 April 2006.
Recommendation
That the minutes of the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee
meeting held on Wednesday 5 April 2006, as circulated to all Committee
members, be confirmed as a true and accurate record.
Moved Cr D Hoult
Seconded Mr G Ridgley
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
MF 5.0
MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION
MF 5.1 Marine Facilities Report by Martin Searle MA 100
Author
Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Background
The Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee is advised that the
Department for Planning and Infrastructure (Marine) commissioned Mr Martin
Searle to undertake a comprehensive report of the town jetties and the revetment
wall.
Comment
Mr Searle came to Denham in September 2006 to undertake this report which is
now complete and submitted for the Committee's and the Department for
Planning and Infrastructure's consideration.
Legal Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Strategic Implications
Nil.
Recommendation
That the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee recommends to
Council the contents and recommendation (of Mr Searle's) report.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 43
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 22 November 2006
Mr Nich Grundy discussed Martin Searle’s Report explaining the table of
expenditure over the next 5 years.
Mr G Ridgley discussed widening the slipway by taking out a section of the
groyne.
The water service to the jetty was discussed along with the dredging and poles in
the pen area. Priority to the Recreation Jetty poles and dredging was approved.
Mr N Grundy discussed the last meeting repairs list and new piles for the
Recreation Jetty. Nich advised that the engineers will look at this issue. Council
has the option to use Department of Planning and Infrastructure’s maintenance
contractors.
Moved Mr G Ridgley
Seconded Cr D O Hoult
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
MF 5.2 Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee Member Vacancy MA 100.01
Author
Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Background
The Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee comprises three
Councillors, the Chief Executive Officer and three community members.
Currently the Committee is represented by only two community members.
Comment
In order that the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee functions with
a full complement of members the community member vacancy needs to be
advertised and filled.
Legal Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Strategic Implications
Nil.
Recommendation
That the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee recommends to
Council that Council advertise to fill the remaining vacancy on the Denham
Marine Facilities Management Committee.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 44
Date of Report 22 November 2006
Moved Mr G Ridgley
Seconded Mr J McLaughlin
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
MF 5.3 Cyclone Contingency Plan CY 101
Author
Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Background
The Cyclone Contingency Plan for the maritime facility at Denham has not been
updated since December 2004.
Comment
The current (December 2004) Cyclone Contingency Plan is attached. Members
are requested to peruse the Plan and note any amendments/additions required.
Legal Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Strategic Implications
Nil.
Recommendation
That the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee recommends to
Council that Council amend the Cyclone Contingency for the Maritime
Facility at Denham to include Department of Planning and Infrastructure’s
alterations.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 24 November 2006
The Chief Executive Officer advised the amendments he had noted were mainly
in the data directory and date changes to reflect current plan and could not
comment on technical data within plan. Mr N Grundy and Mr A Tansey advised
that this technical data could be included from the newly amended and updated
Carnarvon Cyclone Contingency Plan. Mr A Tansey provided a copy to the
Committee for information and use where applicable.
Moved Cr D Hoult
Seconded Mr G Ridgley
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
MF 6.0
MF 6.1
MF 6.2
INFORMAL DISCUSSION
Winch Operations and Training
Life Expectancy of the Denham Recreation Jetty and its Future

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 45
MF 6.3
MF 6.4
MF 6.5
MF 6.6
MF 6.7
MF 6.8
MF 7.0
The Dredging of the Pen and Foreshore Area
Denham Fisheries Officers Loading Quad Bikes from the Denham Recreational
Jetty in the Swimming Area
Litter Thrown Overboard by a Local Fishing Vessel
Subsiding of the New Boat Ramp
Snapped Bollard on the Denham Jetty
Dual Line Oil Tank
URGENT BUSINESS APPROVED BY THE PERSON PRESIDING OR BY
DECISION
MF 7.1 Extension to Fuel Lease Agreement MA 100 FU 101
Discussion was held on the letter received from Oregon Nominees Pty Ltd in
regards to the extension of the lease agreement.
Re - Agreement - Extension and Variation of Sub-Lease - Lot 302 of Reserve
38444
Clause 7 of the above Agreement which was stamped on the eleventh of February 2005
grants an option of a further term to this Agreement. The length of the Option Term is
defined in Item 5 of The Schedule which forms part of the Agreement.
The Agreement states that the Sub-Lessee (Oregon Nominees Pty Ltd) must give to the
Sub-Lessor (Shire of Shark Bay) at least 3 months notice if it wished this further term to
be granted. The existing term is due to expire on 31 March 2007.
On behalf of Oregon Nominees Pty Ltd I wish to apply for that further term as defined in
the Agreement to be granted.
Please advise what, if any, further requirements you may have of Oregon Nominees Pty
Ltd to allow this option period to be granted and whether the Shark Bay Shire are able to
offer a further option for an extension of the new term.
Now is the time to send a letter advising of the work that needs to be completed in
the fuel facility area stating that these matters need to be attended to before new
lease agreement is signed.
MF 7.2 Tourism WA - Landbank - Jetty Costing MA 100
Mr N Grundy advised that a letter had been received from the Tourism WA
Development - Landbank asking about the costing for a jetty in the new
subdivision area that is currently being planned.
The Chief Executive Officer commented that there had been no mention of this to
Council at the last meeting. All that was proposed was a boardwalk, café and
roadworks in regard to the plans being proposed by Tourism WA - Landbank for
the “Potters” block on Stella Rowley Drive.
MF 8.0
MF 8.1
MF 9.0
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting of the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee will
be held in the Meeting Room in the Shire Office, before the budget process is
closed, on a date to be decided.
CLOSE
The meeting closed at 12.19 pm.
16.1.2 DENHAM MARINE FACILITIES MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING 7 MAY 2007
A meeting was held on 7 May 2007 and the recommendations follow.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 46
Recommendations of the Meeting of the Denham Marine Facilities Management
Committee held in the Meeting Room in the Shire Office on 7 May 2007
MF 1.0
MF 2.0
DECLARATION OF OPENING
In the absence of the President Cr D O Hoult Chaired the meeting. Cr Hoult
declared the meeting open at 5:10 pm.
RECORD OF ATTENDANCES/APOLOGIES/LEAVE OF ABSENCE GRANTED
Attendances Cr D O Hoult Chair
Cr R G Blennerhassett
Mr G Ridgley
Mr J McLaughlin
Mr K J Matthews Chief Executive Officer
Mr G Brown
Mrs R Mettam
Works Supervisor
Minute Clerk
Visitors Mr Aidan Tansey Regional Services Manager Carnarvon
Department for Planning and Infrastructure
Apologies Cr L R Moss President
Cr K M Gordon General Deputy
MF 3.0
MF 4.0
MF 4.1
PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
The public question time commenced at 5:10 pm. There being no public present
the public question time ceased at 5:11 pm.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
Confirmation of the Minutes of the Denham Marine Facilities Management
Committee meeting held on Wednesday 1 December 2006.
Recommendation
That the minutes of the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee
meeting held on Wednesday 1 December 2006, as circulated to all
Committee members, be confirmed as a true and accurate record.
Moved Cr D Hoult
Seconded Mr G Ridgley
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
MF 5.0
MATTERS FOR DISCUSSION
MF 5.1 Marine Facilities Fees and Charges 2007/2008 BU 101 MA 100
Recommendation
That the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee recommends to
Council, that Council adopt the following fees and charges, which
incorporate a 4% CPI increase, for the 2007/2008 financial year.
Function
Program
Particulars
Proposed
Budget
Charge
2007/08
Actual
Charge
2006/07
GST
Frequency
General
Ledger
A/c
Monkey Mia Jetty
Annual Jetty Fee
- Commercial tourism boat
operators
88.50 85.00 Y Per Metre of
Vessel Length
- Commercial fishing boats 28.10 27.00 Y Per Metre of
Vessel Length
- Monthly Payment of Annual Fee 15% 15% Percentage of
Annual Fee
45403708

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 47
Function
Program
Particulars
Proposed
Budget
Charge
2007/08
Actual
Charge
2006/07
GST
Frequency
General
Ledger
A/c
TRANSPORT
- E Class Commercial Operation
License for Wildlife Interaction
Tours within the Red Cliff Bay
Marine Mammal Interaction
restricted area zone -
- T Class Commercial Operation
License for Wildlife Interaction
Tours.
1.10 1.10 Y Per Passenger
Head
1.10 Y Per Passenger
Head
Denham Marina
Slipway Charges
Vessels 45503745
Under 12 metres in length N/A 85.00 Y Per Day or part
thereof
Over 12 metres in length N/A 85.00 Y Per Day or part
thereof
Haulage Charges
Haulage only onto slipway/
ramp for exclusive purpose
of Transport Marine Safety
Survey (Limited Period)
Haulage all other Vessels
(includes haul up and
down)
172.00
245.00
165.00
235.00
Y Per Vessel
weekdays
Per Vessel
Weekends/public
holidays
172.00 165.00 Y Per Vessel
Power 6.80 6.50 Y At Cost with a
Minimum Daily
Fee of
45503747
45503747
Water 4.20 4.00 Y Per Day or part 45503747
thereof
Electric Power Charges
6.80 6.50 Per Day or part 45503747
(Three Phase at Jetty)
thereof
- (Includes Vessels and
Freezer Trucks)
6.80 6.50 Per Day or part
thereof
Pen and Berthing Fees 45503753
Annual Pen Fee (Includes
Service Jetty Fee)
121.00 116.00 Y Per Metre of
Vessel Length
- Monthly Payment of
Annual Fee
15% 15% Y Percentage of
Annual Fee
- Monthly Pen Fee 25% 25% Y Percentage of
Annual Fee
Annual Fee for use of Service
Jetty for Loading and
Unloading
41.00 39.00 Y Per Metre of
Vessel Length
45503753
Daily Casual Berthing Fee (per 5.00 4.50 Y Per Metre of 45503753
day or part thereof)
Vessel Length
Service Jetty Hardstand 45503786
On Slipway in front of Winch
House
26.50 25.50 Y Per Day or part
thereof
Between Toilet Block and Winch
House and East of Fuel
Storage Tank and West of
Service Jetty
13.00 12.50 Y Per Day or part
thereof
Power Charge (Single Phase)
(Included in Annual/Casual
Berthing Fees)
6.80 6.50 Y Per Day or part
thereof
Water Charge 4.20 4.00 Y At Cost with a
Minimum Daily
Fee of
45503747
45503747
Fuel Wharfage Charge 0.022 0.022 Y Per Litre 45503730
Vessel breakdown daily fee (non 100.00 Y Per day or part
jetty annual paying user)
thereof
Lengthy debate and discussion took place in regard to the proposed fees and
charges for the “E” Class and “T” Class licence operators using the Monkey Mia
jetty and in particular the difference in this charging model in comparison to the

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 48
per metre per vessel model used at both the Denham facility and for other users
of the Monkey Mia facility.
The Chief Executive Officer advised the Committee that Council had resolved at
its Ordinary meeting in July 2006 to impose the fee of $1.00 per passenger head
plus GST for the newly licensed “E” Class operator using the Monkey Mia jetty.
Council similarly resolved at its March 2007 Ordinary meeting to impose the same
fee to the “T” Class licensed operator using the Monkey Mia jetty. Any change to
this fee structure would require a rescission motion from Council.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 12 April 2007
Moved Cr Hoult
Seconded Mr Matthews
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
MF 5.2 Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee Member Vacancy MA 100.01
Recommendation
That the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee recommends to
Council that Council re-advertise to fill the remaining vacancy on the
Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee by a Community
member.
Some discussion took place in regard to the Department for Planning and
Infrastructure Marine Gascoyne Regional Manager (Mr Aidan Tansey) being
invited to join the Committee. Department for Planning and Infrastructure Marine
has expressed an interest in being represented on the Committee. It was agreed
in discussion that the community member vacancy be advertised first in order to
determine any interest from the community on being a member of the Committee.
Following this process Council can then assess the matter of having the
Department for Planning and Infrastructure Marine Regional Manager represented
on the Committee.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 12 April 2007
Moved Mr McLaughlin
Seconded Mr Ridgely
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
MF 5.3 Code of Conduct MA 100
Recommendation
That the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee recommends to
Council that Council amend the Code of Conduct for the Maritime Facility at
Denham to include the following as Code of Conduct number 14 and
vessels that are broken down and do not pay an annual jetty fee be levied a
fee for the duration of the breakdown.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 12 April 2007

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 49
Moved Cr Hoult
Seconded Mr Matthews
That the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee recommends to
Council that Council amend the Code of Conduct for the Maritime Facility at
Denham to include the following as Code of Conduct number 14 –
14 In the event of any vessels that are broken down and that do not pay
an annual jetty fee, a daily fee of $100.00 (or part thereof) is to be
levied for the duration of the breakdown and that this fee be
included in Council’s 2007/08 budget.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
MF 5.4 Allocation of Vacant Pen MA 100
Recommendation
That the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee recommends to
Council that -
1 Fisheries WA (Shark Bay) is offered the boat pen currently utilised
by Mr Barry Beales when it becomes available after 30 June 2007.
2 That the waiting list be updated and done on an annual basis.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 12 April 2007
Moved Mr Matthews
Seconded Mr Ridgely
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
MF 5.5 Denham Marine Facilities Fuel Lease - Oregon Nominees Pty Ltd MA 100
Recommendation
That the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee recommend to
Council that Council agree to the fuel facility lease being allotted to Bailey’s
Marine instead of the current sub lease arrangement with Oregon Nominees
Pty Ltd subject to -
1 Agreement from Oregon Nominees Pty Ltd to relinquishing its
current lease with Council.
2 Any new lease agreement be directly between Bailey’s Marine and
the Department for Planning and Infrastructure.
3 Council not being financially disadvantaged by any new lease
agreement between Bailey’s Marine and the Department for
Planning and Infrastructure.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 12 April 2007
Moved Cr Hoult
Seconded Mr Matthews
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 50
MF 5.6 Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee Name MA 100
Recommendation
That the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee recommends to
Council that Council agree to the change of the Committee’s name to Shark
Bay Marine Facilities Management Committee.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 30 April 2007
Moved Cr Hoult
Seconded Mr McLaughlin
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
MF 6.0
MF 6.1
MF 6.2
MF 7.0
INFORMAL DISCUSSION
Monkey Mia Jetty Fees and Usage
Denham Marine Facilities Upgrade
URGENT BUSINESS APPROVED BY THE PERSON PRESIDING OR BY
DECISION
Nil.
MF 8.0
MF 8.1
MF 9.0
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting of the Denham Marine Facilities Management Committee will
be held in the Meeting Room in the Shire Office on a date to be decided.
CLOSE
Recommendation
The meeting closed at 6:55 pm.
1 That the confirmed minutes of the Denham Marine Facilities Management
Committee held on 1 December 2006 be received.
2 That recommendations MF 5.1 to MF 5.6 of the Denham Marine Facilities
Management Committee held on 8 May 2007 be adopted.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 22 May 2007
Moved Cr Hoult
Seconded Cr Blennerhassett
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
The Chief Executive Officer commented there had been considerable discussion regarding
the Monkey Mia jetty fees and this would be discussed later in the meeting Behind Closed
Doors.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 51
16.2 SHARK BAY WORLD HERITAGE DISCOVERY CENTRE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE BU 106.03.01
16.2.1 SHARK BAY WORLD HERITAGE DISCOVERY CENTRE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE BU 106.03.01
MEETING MINUTES 1 DECEMBER 2006
The following minutes of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Management
Committee meeting held on 8 December 2006 were confirmed at the Shark Bay World
Heritage Discovery Centre Management Committee meeting held on 23 May 2007.
Minutes of the inaugural Meeting of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre
Management Committee held in the Function Room, Heritage Resort on Friday 8
December 2006.
DC 1.0
DECLARATION OF OPENING
In the absence of the President the Deputy President, Cr R W Eddington,
assumed the Chair and declared the meeting open at 4.00 pm.
Cr Eddington welcomed all who attended and gave a brief background to the
purpose of the meeting which included explaining what Council's expectations
were from the Committee and how the Committee would function in conjunction
with the proposed Visitors Centre.
DC 2.0
DC 3.0
DC 4.0
DC 4.1
RECORD OF ATTENDANCES/APOLOGIES/LEAVE OF ABSENCE GRANTED
Attendances Cr R W Eddington Deputy President
Mr K J Matthews Chief Executive Officer
Hon V A Catania MLC Member for Mining and Pastoral
Mrs K Button
Majestic Tours
Mr L Deschamps Shark Bay Safaris
Visitors
Cr D O Hoult
Mr Steve Potter
Mr Joachim Azzopardi
Apologies Cr L R Moss President
PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
Senior Advisor Minister for Planning
and Infrastructure's Office
Journalist Northern Guardian
The public question time opened at 4.01 pm. There being no public present the
public question time closed at 4.01 pm.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
Inaugural Meeting
As this is the inaugural meeting of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery
Centre Management Committee there are no minutes to confirm.
DC 5.0
DC 5.1
REPORTS
Function and Purpose of Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre
Management Committee
Author
Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Background
Council established the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Management
Committee for the purpose of advising Council of issues relevant to the

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 52
operational management and strategic direction of the Shark Bay World Heritage
Discovery Centre.
In doing so it is intended to take the views and suggestions from outside of
Council such as those provided by the other members of the Committee.
Comment
The function, or terms of reference, of the Committee would be stated as those
of -
A
B
C
Determining the strategic direction for the operations of the Centre.
Providing advice to Council on matters regarding the day to day
operations of the Centre.
Representing the views of Council in regard to the Centre to industry
businesses and Government alike.
Legal Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Strategic Implications
Nil.
Recommendation
That the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Management
Committee recommend to Council that the purpose and function of the
Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Management Committee be
defined as the following Terms of Reference -
A
B
C
Determining the strategic direction for the operations of the Centre.
Providing advice to Council on matters regarding the day to day
operations of the Centre.
Representing the views of Council in regard to the Centre to
industry businesses and Government alike.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 5 December 2006
The Chief Executive Officer spoke briefly on the purpose and function of the
Committee in support of what Cr Eddington had said earlier. This included
advising the Committee that as this was the inaugural meeting the Terms of
Reference for the Committee would be altered to adjust to the scope of the
Committee in the future. The following agenda items would also be part of the
Terms of Reference of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre
Management Committee in the future.
Moved Hon V Catania
Seconded Mrs K Button
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 53
DC 5.2
Marketing and Merchandise
Author
Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Background
Council recently decided to introduce a limited commercial merchandising focus
to the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre. This change included
amending the name of the Centre from Shark Bay Interpretive Centre to Shark
Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre.
Other commercial initiatives include expanding the range of books for sale in the
Centre and investigating the availability of high quality (relevant) souvenirs for sale
from the Centre.
Council also initiated the process of the Centre becoming a Level 1 Accredited
Visitor Centre.
Comment
Council has begun the process of changing the focus of the Centre to a more
commercial basis.
Opportunity also exists for paving the current space in front of the Centre to utilise
as a café alfresco area for lease to existing commercial operators in the vicinity.
This would not provide direct competition by Council to any of these existing
businesses.
Provision for marketing of the Centre has been made to Council's 2006/07
budget.
Legal Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Strategic Implications
Nil.
Recommendation
That the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Management
Committee recommend to Council other marketing and merchandising
options for the Centre.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 5 December 2006
The Chairperson, Cr Eddington, expanded on the merchandising opportunities by
advising that Council had already begun investigating with Market Creations
souvenir lines for sale in the Centre. These included small shell blocks, coasters
in the form of Dirk Hartog plates, placemats from early explorer maps, CD
soundscapes and perhaps photographic booklets of the terrestrial, marine and
maritime aspects of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 54
Moved Mrs K Button
Seconded Mr L Deschamps
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
DC 5.3
Inclusion of Visitor Services
Author
Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Background
The introduction of Tourism WA Visitor Centre services demonstrates Council's
commitment to commercialising the operations of the Shark Bay World Heritage
Discovery Centre without adversely affecting local businesses.
Council has successfully applied for Level 1 accreditation of the Centre following
the recent demise of the only other Visitor Centre operator.
Relevant grants for the Centre were completed and submitted to Tourism WA
before the nominated closing date of 30 November 2006. These grants were for
online booking system, telephony system, brochure racking and applicable
signage.
Visitor Centre information services will compliment and benefit the operations of
the Centre.
Comment
One of the crucial functions of the Centre when accredited as a Visitor Centre is
to provide membership of the Centre to businesses/Government Agencies
involved directly and/or indirectly in the tourism industry. In doing so various
categories will be developed to accommodate membership.
Council staff are currently developing this policy document for Council's
consideration and adoption.
A requirement of this membership will be to elect a Committee that will meet to
provide input and advice on issues regarding the services provided by the Centre.
The logical reporting process for this Committee may be to the Shark Bay World
Heritage Discovery Centre Management Committee.
Legal Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Strategic Implications
Nil.
Recommendation
That the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Management
Committee recommend to Council that the Shark Bay World Heritage
Discovery Centre Management Committee serve as a reporting body for the
proposed Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Visitor Centre
Services Membership Committee.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 55
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 5 December 2006
The Chief Executive Officer gave an update on the Visitor Centre accreditation
and how the concept would integrate with the functions of the Shark Bay World
Heritage Discovery Centre. In particular, when fully operational as a Visitor
Centre and with the requirement to have a Centre Membership Base Committee
which could provide advice on industry issues to the Management Committee.
This way Council would be informed of tourism industry issues for debate and
consideration.
The Chairperson advised that Council would be considering early in the New Year
the membership category policy for the Visitors Centre and that the Management
Committee would be involved with input into this policy.
Moved Mr L Deschamps
Seconded Mrs K Button
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
DC 6.0
DC 6.1
DC 6.2
DC 7.0
DC 8.0
DC 8.1
INFORMAL DISCUSSION
World Heritage Drive
Centre Exhibition
URGENT BUSINESS APPROVED BY THE PERSON PRESIDING OR BY
DECISION
Nil.
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre
Management Committee will be held in the Shire office meeting room on a date
and time to be determined.
The Chairperson, Cr R Eddington, advised that the meeting cycle of the Shark
Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Management Committee is envisaged to
meet three to four times each year.
The Hon Vince Catania MLC said he would be making every effort to attend all
meetings and saw the Committee as a valuable mechanism to improve the
viability of the Centre.
Mr Steve Potter applauded Council and the Committee on the World Heritage
Drive initiative and stated these were the types of initiatives that benefited a
community's viability.
DC 9.0
CLOSE
The Chairperson thanked all those attending and closed the meeting at 5.38 pm.
16.2.2 SHARK BAY WORLD HERITAGE DISCOVERY CENTRE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE BU 106.03.01
MEETING 23 MAY 2007
A meeting was held on 23 May 2007 and the recommendations follow.
Recommendations of the meeting of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre
Management Committee held in the Meeting Room in the Shire Offices on
Wednesday 23 May 2007

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 56
DC 1.0
DC 2.0
DECLARATION OF OPENING
The Deputy President declared the meeting open at 5.25 pm.
RECORD OF ATTENDANCES/APOLOGIES/LEAVE OF ABSENCE GRANTED
Attendances Cr R W Eddington Deputy President
Mr K J Matthews Chief Executive Officer
Hon V A Catania MLC Member for Mining and Pastoral
Mr L Deschamps Shark Bay Safaris
Apologies Cr L R Moss President
Mrs K Button
Majestic Tours
DC 3.0
DC 4.0
DC 4.1
PUBLIC QUESTION TIME
The public question time commenced at 5.25 pm. There being no public present
the public question time ceased at 5.25 pm.
CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
Confirmation of the Minutes of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre
Management Committee meeting held on Friday 8 December 2006.
Recommendation
That the minutes of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre
Management Committee meeting held on Friday 8 December 2006, as
circulated to all Committee members, be confirmed as a true and accurate
record.
Moved Mr Catania
Seconded Mr Matthews
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
DC 5.0
DC 5.1
REPORTS
Visitor Centre Fees and Commission
Recommendation
That the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Management
Committee recommend to Council that Council impose the following fees
and charges for Visitor Centre membership and for booking commission
rates at the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre -
1 Membership -
1.1 Corporate membership $500.00 per annum
1.2 Accommodation membership
36 plus rooms $396.00 per annum
12-36 rooms $290.00 per annum
Caravan Parks
$290.00 per annum
Up to 11 rooms
$290.00 per annum
Backpackers
$290.00 per annum
1.3 Tour Operator, $290.00 per annum
Air Charter and Car/Bus Hire
$290.00 per annum
1.4 Real Estate $290.00 per annum
1 5 Holiday Homes (per property) $290.00 per annum
1.6 General Business $290.00 per annum
1 7 Website Listing Only $120.00 per annum
1 8 Brochure Display Only $80.00 per annum
1 9 Individuals $55.00 per annum
Non Profit Organisations
$55.00 per annum
2 Booking commission rates be 10-12 % for members and 20-25% for
non members.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 57
3 That a notice be placed in the Northern Guardian newspaper and on
the Shire of Shark Bay noticeboard of Council's intention to
introduce these charges in accordance with Section 6.19 of the
Local Government Act 1995.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 16 May 2007
Moved Cr Mr Catania
Seconded Cr Mr Deschamps
That the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Management
Committee recommend to Council that Council impose the following fees
and charges for Visitor Centre membership and for booking commission
rates at the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre -
1 Membership -
1.1 Corporate membership $500.00 per annum
1.2 Accommodation membership
36 plus rooms $396.00 per annum
12-36 rooms $290.00 per annum
Caravan Parks
$290.00 per annum
Up to 11 rooms
$290.00 per annum
Backpackers
$290.00 per annum
1.3 Tour Operator, $290.00 per annum
Air Charter and Car/Bus Hire
$290.00 per annum
1.4 Real Estate $290.00 per annum
1 5 Holiday Homes (per property) $290.00 per annum
1.6 General Business $290.00 per annum
1.7 Website Listing Only $120.00 per annum
1 8 Brochure Display Only $80.00 per annum
1.9 Individuals $55.00 per annum
Non Profit Organisations
$55.00 per annum
2 Booking commission rates be 12% for members and 20% for non
members.
3 A 50% discount apply to the above membership categories with the
exception of Corporate membership for those operators who are
also members of the Shark Bay Tourist Association for the 2007/08
year.
4 That a notice be placed in the Northern Guardian newspaper and on
the Shire of Shark Bay noticeboard of Council's intention to
introduce these charges in accordance with Section 6.19 of the
Local Government Act 1995.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
DC 5.2
Marketing and Merchandise Update
Recommendation
That the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Management
Committee recommend to Council that Council continue to pursue other
marketing and merchandising options for the Shark Bay World Heritage
Discovery Centre.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 16 May 2007

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 58
Moved Mr Deschamps
Seconded Mr Catania
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
DC 6.0
DC 6.1
DC 7.0
DC 8.0
DC 8.1
DC 9.0
INFORMAL DISCUSSION
Booking System for Visitor Centre
URGENT BUSINESS APPROVED BY THE PERSON PRESIDING OR BY
DECISION
Nil.
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre
Management Committee will be held in the Shire office meeting room at a time
and date to be determined.
CLOSE
The Chairperson thanked all those attending and closed the meeting at 6.10 pm.
Recommendation
1 That the confirmed minutes of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre
Management Committee held on 8 December 2006 be received.
2 That recommendations DC 5.1 to DC 5.2 of the Shark Bay World Heritage
Discovery Centre Management Committee held on 23 May 2007 be adopted.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 24 May 2007
Moved Cr Eddington
Seconded Cr Crawford
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
16.3 GASCOYNE DISTRICT DISPLAY - PERTH AGRICULTURAL ROYAL SHOW 2007 TO 104
Author
Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil.
Background
Council has received written advice and request from the Shire of Carnarvon to support the
forthcoming Gascoyne District Display at the 2007 Perth Royal Agricultural Show. The
display will highlight the various social and economic opportunities in the Gascoyne Region.
The 2007 Show runs during the school holiday period of 29 September to 15 October 2007.
The Shire of Carnarvon requests a financial donation as well as logistical support at the
display similar to that provided by Council last year. A copy of the written request is as
follows -

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 59
ROYAL SHOW DISTRICT DISPLAY 2007
Once again I am writing to seek your support towards the Gascoyne District Display at the 2007
Royal Agricultural Society Show.
As per last year, the Shire of Carnarvon will be contributing to this year's display and I am
requesting that your Shire along with the other Shires in the Gascoyne region also contribute. Last
year you contributed $2,000.
This display is a fantastic opportunity for the Gascoyne to showcase our region to the State. I have
enclosed last year's advertisement calling for volunteers and also a picture of last year's display
which took first place for the Northern Region. Funding will go towards advertising/promotional
material, graphic designer fees, travel assistance for volunteers and various other costs including set
up, freight of goods and produce and technical equipment.
We are seeking more input and assistance this year and want the coordination of the event to be a
joint effort between a nominated contact person at your Shire and our Community Development
Officer, Olivia Devine, from the Shire of Carnarvon. This year we can start to plan ahead and we
could look at getting bags made up to give away which could be pre-packed to include all Shire and
Visitor centre brochures and samples from our region. I acknowledge the support from Gina and
yourself at last year's display.
I trust this arrangement is suitable and mutually beneficial and I look forward to working together
towards this year's Gascoyne District Display. If you have any queries, please contact me directly
on 99410050

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 60
Comment
Council supported the display in 2006 by providing financial assistance of $2,000 and a staff
member from the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre. Council also contributed to
the production of banners for display at the Show which can be again used at this years
display. Figures from 2006 indicate that approximately 55,000 people visited the display.
Once again participation provides an opportunity for Council to market the Shark Bay World
Heritage Discovery Centre as well as other tourism and economic activities of Shark Bay.
Council can send one of the Centre staff to assist at the display and also promote the
Centre by PowerPoint (continuous) presentation.
A report from the 2006 event was completed by the staff member attending and was
provided to Council late last year as information. This report will be available at the Council
meeting for Councillor's information.
Legal Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Financial assistance request of $2,000 plus associated staff costs for wages,
accommodation and travel be provided in the 2007/08 budget. Total cost for 2006 was
approximately $3,200.00.
Strategic Implications
Promotional marketing of Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre and other areas of
Shark Bay at 2007 Perth Royal Agricultural Show to potentially over 50,000 people.
Recommendation
That Council allocate the sum of $2,000 in support of the 2007 Gascoyne District
Display at this year's Perth Royal Agricultural Show.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 10 May 2007

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 61
Moved Cr Blennerhassett
Seconded Cr Cane
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
8.1 AUSTRALIAN CITIZENSHIP CEREMONY - LESLIE ANN STAFFORD NA 105
The Deputy President conducted the Australian Citizenship Ceremony for Mrs Leslie Ann
Stafford and welcomed her as an Australian. He then invited Mrs Stafford, family and
friends to join with Councillors for morning tea.
The meeting adjourned at 10.14 am and reconvened at 10.41 am with all those previously in
attendance present.
17.0 ADMINISTRATION REPORT
17.1 SHARK BAY WORLD HERITAGE DISCOVERY CENTRE PARLIAMENTARY BU 106.03
WORKING GROUP
Author
Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil.
Background
Council has attempted for some time to arrange negotiations with Government Agencies/
Ministers to discuss the ongoing operational viability of the Shark Bay World Heritage
Discovery Centre. In May 2006 the (then) Minister for the Environment advised Council in
writing and with comments he made in the media that Council needed to consider
commercialising the operations of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre to
ensure its viability.
Since that time Council has investigated and implemented various strategies in accordance
with the comments made by the (then) Minister on the understanding that some assistance
by the State Government would be reciprocal.
With the assistance of the Hon Vince Catania MLC, a workshop was convened for Monday
7 May 2007 in Shark Bay Chaired by the Hon Sally Talbot MLC, Parliamentary Secretary to
the Minister for the Environment. The purpose of the workshop forum was specifically to
discuss the situation regarding the ongoing financial viability of the Shark Bay World
Heritage Discovery Centre. Those attending included -
* Hon Sally Talbot MLC
* Hon Vince Catania MLC
* Shire of Shark Bay Councillors and Chief Executive Officer -
(Cr Les Moss, Cr Bob Eddington, Cr Bryan Cane, Cr Robert Blennerhassett, Cr
Dennis Hoult and the Chief Executive Officer)
* Mr Tim Bowra, Principal Policy Adviser Minister for the Environment
* Mr Stephen Yule, Chief Executive Officer Gascoyne Development Commission
* Ms Lorraine Fitzpatrick, Manager Gascoyne Aboriginal Cultural Centre (Carnarvon)
* Mr Mike Flood, Regional Gascoyne Manager Tourism WA
* Mr Brett Fitzgerald, A/District Manager Shark Bay Department of Environment and
Conservation
* Mr Peter Sharp, A/Director Parks and Visitor Services Department of Environment
and Conservation
* Mr Murray Carter Department of Environment and Conservation
* Ms Cindy Portland, Policy Adviser Office of the Minister for Regional Development

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 62
Most of the workshop forum participants arrived at Shark Bay in the morning and had the
opportunity of a tour through the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre. The agenda
for the workshop provided by the Minister’s office was based on the following points for
discussion -
• Current funding arrangements for the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre
• Management issue
• Options to increase revenue such as retail merchandising within the Centre, relocating
a Visitor Centre into the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre and enhanced
marketing of the Centre and Shark Bay region
• The Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Business Plan
Comment
The workshop forum discussed the above agenda items whereby Council advised that
some of the matters had either been implemented or were in progress towards
implementation. For example, the accreditation of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery
Centre as a Visitors Centre had been finalised, funding from Tourism WA for the
implementation of computer software system (Bookeasy), telephony (freecall) system and
business premises enhancement had been recently approved, change of the name of the
Centre to reflect World Heritage, and the sale of merchandise products in the Centre.
An outline of the Centre’s history was provided especially where relevant to the Business
Plan for the Centre and the current funding arrangements. Importantly Council emphasised
that it was not seeking any direct financial handout but was seeking assistance from the
State Government to overcome the difficulties in attracting a market share of tourists that
visit Shark Bay to the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre. Furthermore, even
though the original Business Plan had reflected the principle of Joint Ticketing with entrance
to the Department of Environment and Conservation operations at Monkey Mia, Council
understands the difficulties in implementing this process and in particular the legislative,
administrative and technical issues associated with this principle. Unfortunately when the
Business Plan was finalised by the Shire of Shark Bay and the Steering Committee in 2004
as an appendix to the Funding Assistance Agreement signed by the (then) Minister for Local
Government and Regional Development it had included the principle of joint ticketing in the
Financial Forecasts for its 2005/06 budget.
A copy of the budget Year To Date (YTD) for the first three quarter period of 2006/07 (ie
1 July to 30 September, 1 October to 31 December and 1 January to 31 March) was
provided by the Chief Executive Officer to the workshop reflecting the current financial
position of the Centre. Most participants at the workshop had a copy of the Business Plan
and there was unanimous agreement that the Business Plan needed to be rewritten
especially in the financial and marketing sections of the Plan.
The workshop forum resolved to form a Working Group to be chaired by the Hon Sally
Talbot MLC for the purpose of primarily rewriting the Business Plan where relevant to the
financial and marketing sections and to investigate areas of marketing opportunities to
increase and encourage the tourism sector to Denham and the Shark Bay World Heritage
Discovery Centre. The workshop noted and applauded the work undertaken by the Shire of
Shark Bay in this regard with the proposed Shark Bay World Heritage Drive.
The Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Working Group is to consist of nominated
representatives at the workshop forum that include -
* The Hon Sally Talbot MLC, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for the
Environment (Chair of the Working Group)
* Mr Tim Bowra Principal Policy Adviser Minister for the Environment
* Ms Cindy Portland, Policy Adviser Office of the Minister for Regional Development
* The Shire of Shark Bay (to be nominated by Council)
* The Hon Vince Catania MLC
* Gascoyne Development Commission (to be nominated by Gascoyne Development
Commission but to include the Chief Executive Officer)
* Tourism WA (to be nominated by Tourism WA)

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 63
* Department of Environment and Conservation (to be nominated by Department of
Environment and Conservation)
Following a meeting in Perth with the Shire of Shark Bay’s Chief Executive Officer, the Hon
Sally Talbot and Mr Tim Bowra on Tuesday 15 May 2007, it was agreed that this Working
Group be convened as a matter of urgency.
The Chief Executive Officer passed on Council’s comments in regard to the workshop
forum held the previous week in that it was viewed by all those attending from Council as an
extremely positive outcome and that there was optimism for the Shark Bay World Heritage
Discovery Centre's operational viability.
Council also expressed its gratitude and thanks to the Hon Vince Catania for his efforts in
achieving the workshop forum in Shark Bay and to the Hon Sally Talbot for showing interest
and making the effort to come to Shark Bay to not only see the Shark Bay World Heritage
Discovery Centre but to discuss the issues face to face with Council.
Legal Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
Relevant to the Business Plan for the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre.
Financial Implications
Nil.
Strategic Implications
Relevant to the Business Plan for the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre.
Recommendation
That Council nominate the Shire President, Deputy Shire President and the Chief
Executive Officer to the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Working Group
Chaired by the Hon Sally Talbot MLC.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 21 May 2007
Moved Cr Cane
Seconded Cr Hoult
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
17.2 POLICY 8.1 ANNUAL LEAVE PO 101
Author
Finance and Administration Manager
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Background
Annual leave accrues to Shire of Shark Bay staff members as follows -
• Those employees who are on the Local Government Officers' Award or the Municipal
Employees' Award accrue 5 weeks (190 hours) annual leave per annum.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 64
• Those employees who are classified as Senior Employees as per the Local
Government Act 1995 accrue leave at a rate that is stipulated in their employment
contact agreement with the Shire of Shark Bay, which is generally 5 weeks (190
hours) per annum.
• With the exception of staff who are classified as Senior Employees under the Act,
annual leave loading of 17.5% (as per conditions set out in the Awards) is paid on
annual leave as the leave is taken.
Comment
The current Policy states -
8.1 Annual Leave
(1) Except where specially approved by Council, staff are not to accrue annual leave
beyond one year’s entitlement.
(2) The Chief Executive Officer shall determine a leave roster suitable to staff within
Council’s requirements to ensure minimal disruption to Council’s operations.
(3) Unless specifically approved by the Chief Executive Officer staff are not to accrue
rostered days off in excess of five days.
The purpose of developing, adopting and applying an Annual Leave Policy is to clearly
outline the way in which employees’ annual leave entitlements are managed in order to
ensure that employees take their annual leave regularly each year and that the Shire of
Shark Bay’s annual leave liability is minimised.
The revised Annual Leave Policy also covers the maximum accrual of rostered days off
(RDOs). The maximum accrual for RDOs has been changed from five days to three days.
8.1 Annual Leave
(1) Maximum Accrual
a
b
c
d
e
Annual Leave is to be taken at a time mutually convenient to the employer and
employee.
Annual Leave is not to accrue beyond 6 weeks (228 hours) at any time except
in cases in which extenuating circumstances preclude an employee from taking
their leave.
To enable annual leave accruals to be monitored, a monthly report outlining all
employees’ leave accruals will be provided by the officer responsible for payroll
to the Finance and Administration Manager.
Where it is proposed that an employee's leave accrual will exceed this 6 week
limit, a written application for deferral will be submitted to the Chief Executive
Officer for approval. This application must be submitted at least 2 months
before the 6 week maximum accrual is reached.
If such approval is not granted, the employee will be paid out the difference
between their total accrued annual leave and the 6 week limit.
(2) Transitory Arrangements
a
b
That Council recognises that, at the time of implementation of this Policy, some
employees have leave accruals in excess of 6 weeks (including both entitled
and pro rata leave).
Accordingly, for those employees who have such excessive leave accruals, the
relevant manager, in consultation with the employee, will provide a plan that
outlines how that employee’s leave accrual will be reduced below the 6 weeks
maximum.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 65
(3) Applications for Leave
a
b
c
The Council recognises the importance to employees of the timing taking
annual leave. In order to maximise this, an application for leave form should be
completed at least 4 weeks before the date of starting leave and directed to the
appropriate manager for approval. It should be noted that any leave applied for
is not approved until the Chief Executive Officer has given his/her approval.
An employee may request to have leave paid in advance as long as the actual
annual leave is 10 or more working days.
There is no minimum amount of leave that can be applied for.
(4) No Minimum Service Required
Upon completion of any stipulated probationary period, there is no requirement for an
employee to wait until they have completed 12 months' continuous service before
taking any accrued leave.
(5) Rostered Days Off
Unless specifically approved by the Chief Executive Officer staff are not to accrue
rostered days off in excess of three days.
Legal Implications
Definition of a Senior Employee as per the Local Government Act 1995. Award conditions
as outlined in the Local Government Officers Award 1999 (WA) and Municipal Employees
Award 1999 (WA).
Policy Implications
Policy 8.1 Annual Leave.
Financial Implications
Once the Policy has been adopted and is able to be administered the Shire of Shark Bay’s
annual leave liability is able to be minimised.
Strategic Implications
Once the Policy has been adopted and is able to be administered the Shire of Shark Bay
can ensure that employees take their annual leave entitlements regularly each year.
Recommendation
That Council replace Policy 8.1 Annual Leave with the following -
8.1 Annual Leave
(1) Maximum Accrual
a
b
c
Annual Leave is to be taken at a time mutually convenient to the employer
and employee.
Annual Leave is not to accrue beyond 6 weeks (228 hours) at any time
except in cases in which extenuating circumstances preclude an
employee from taking their leave.
To enable annual leave accruals to be monitored, a monthly report
outlining all employees’ leave accruals will be provided by the officer
responsible for payroll to the Finance and Administration Manager.
d Where it is proposed that an employee's leave accrual will exceed this 6
week limit, a written application for deferral will be submitted to the Chief
Executive Officer for approval. This application must be submitted at
least 2 months before the 6 week maximum accrual is reached.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 66
e
If such approval is not granted, the employee will be paid out the
difference between their total accrued annual leave and the 6 week limit.
(2) Transitory Arrangements
a
b
That Council recognises that, at the time of implementation of this Policy,
some employees have leave accruals in excess of 6 weeks (including
both entitled and pro rata leave).
Accordingly, for those employees who have such excessive leave
accruals, the relevant manager, in consultation with the employee, will
provide a plan that outlines how that employee’s leave accrual will be
reduced below the 6 weeks maximum.
(3) Applications for Leave
a
b
c
The Council recognises the importance to employees of the timing taking
annual leave. In order to maximise this, an application for leave form
should be completed at least 4 weeks before the date of starting leave and
directed to the appropriate manager for approval. It should be noted that
any leave applied for is not approved until the Chief Executive Officer has
given his/her approval.
An employee may request to have leave paid in advance as long as the
actual annual leave is 10 or more working days.
There is no minimum amount of leave that can be applied for.
(4) No Minimum Service Required
Upon completion of any stipulated probationary period, there is no requirement
for an employee to wait until they have completed 12 months' continuous
service before taking any accrued leave.
(5) Rostered Days Off
Unless specifically approved by the Chief Executive Officer staff are not to
accrue rostered days off in excess of three days.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 9 May 2007
Moved Cr Crawford
Seconded Cr Blennerhassett
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
17.3 REVIEW OF REGISTER OF DELEGATIONS PO 101
Author
Administration and Finance Manager
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil.
Background
Section 5.42 of the Local Government Act 1995 (the Act) provides that a Council may
delegate to the Chief Executive Officer the exercise of any of its powers or the discharge of

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 67
any of its duties under the Act other than those referred to in Section 5.43. Any decision to
make, amend or revoke a delegation is to be by an absolute majority - see Section 5.45(1)
(b).
The Audit Management Report for the 2004/05 year contained a comment regarding the
Register of Delegations not being reviewed in that financial year, as required by Section
5.46(2) of the Act. Although the Register of Delegations has been reviewed each year by
the Chief Executive Officer and the Council the review has not been presented to a Council
meeting since 27 May 1998.
A review of the Register of Delegations occurred in the 2005/06 financial year (March 2006)
in accordance with Section 5.46(2) of the Act with the inclusion of clause 1.16 Corporate
Credit Card.
Comment
Councillors were provided with a copy of the Delegations Register that has been reviewed
by staff. Any changes that have been made are in italics.
The purpose of the review is to consider the operational effectiveness of the current
delegations, whether each delegation is necessary, whether each delegation is appropriate
and whether legislative amendments necessitate any changes.
All delegations have been reviewed to ensure format consistency with other Shire
documents (such as Policies), and with a view of ensuring consistency with references to
statutory references and any changes to relevant legislation that describes the power or duty
being delegated.
Legal Implications
Section 5.46 of the Local Government Act 1995 states that -
(1) The CEO is to keep a register of the delegation made under this Division to the CEO
and to the employees.
(2) At least once every financial year, delegations made under this Division are to be
reviewed by the delegator.
(3) A person to whom a power or duty is delegated under this Act is to keep records in
accordance with regulations in relation to the exercise of the power or the discharge of
the duty.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Nil
Strategic Implications
Allows decisions to be made between Council meeting dates, which if otherwise are not
able to be made would cause lengthy delays and frustration in the day to day operations of
the Shire.
Recommendation
That Council adopt the following Delegations Register which includes amendments
made as a result of the latest review.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Local Government Act 1995
Powers of Delegation
Delegation of some powers and duties to certain Committees

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 68
5.16 (1) Absolute majority required to delegate - cannot delegate power of
delegation.
(2) To be in writing and may be general or conditional.
(3) Can be for a period of time or indefinite.
(4) Does not prevent Council acting through another.
5.17 Limits on delegations to Committees.
5.18 Register of Delegations to be kept and reviewed annually.
Delegation of some powers and duties to Chief Executive Officer
5.42 (1) Absolute majority required to delegate.
(2) To be in writing and may be general or conditional.
5.43 Limits on delegations to Chief Executive Officer.
5.44 Chief Executive Officer may delegate to others, but not the power of
delegation.
5.45 (1) (a) Can be for a period of time or indefinite.
(b) Absolute majority required to amend or revoke.
(2) Does not prevent Council or Chief Executive Officer acting through
another.
5.46 (1) and (2) Register of Delegations to be kept and reviewed annually.
(3) A person to whom a power of duty is delegated under this Act is to keep
records in accordance with Regulations in relation to the exercise of the
power or the discharge of the duty.
(see Regulation 19 of the Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1996)
WORKS
1.1 Donations of Work to Organisations
The Chief Executive Officer is delegated indefinite authority to exercise
discretion on the use of Council resources on small community works for local
facilities in accordance with Policy 2.3.
1.2 Materials for Driveways and Verges
(1) That supply of sand and gravel to private individuals for work on driveways or
street ways be left to the discretion of the Chief Executive Officer and charged
on a private works basis where deemed necessary.
(2) Where no charge is raised, the work is to be accounted for on a contra entry
basis.
1.3 Private Works
That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated authority to determine requests
for private works at his absolute discretion having regard to -
a
b
the nature of the works requested, and
the demands of the works program.
1.4 Temporary Rural Road Closures
The Chief Executive Officer be delegated indefinite authority to temporarily
close rural roads under Section 3.50 of the Local Government Act 1995 during
wet periods to minimise damage from use. – Remove and replaced with 1.21
(22) to 1.21 (27) of Register of Delegations
FINANCE
1.11 Investment of Surplus Funds
That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated authority to invest surplus funds
held in any Council fund from time to time, subject to the requirements of
Policy 6.2. - Remove and replaced with 1.21 (60) of Register of Delegations
1.12 Rates Collection Procedure

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 69
(1) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to exercise powers under
Section 6.49 of the Act to make agreement with a person as to payment of rates
but subject to the imposition of appropriate interest rate charges, having regard
to the interest rate policies adopted by Council in the annual budget. - Remove
and replaced with 1.21 (61) of Register of Delegations
(2) That in extenuating circumstances, where the Chief Executive Officer believes
there may be cause to make an agreement for the payment of rates without the
imposition of interest, the matter be referred to Council for consideration. -
Remove and replaced with 1.21 (61) of Register of Delegations.
1.13 Municipal Account Operation
The Chief Executive Officer be delegated authority to make payments from the
Municipal account before the approval of Council for the following purposes -
Wages,
Payroll deductions,
Telephone,
Electricity,
Water accounts,
Payments to Contractors,
Refunds of Overpayments,
Urgent payment of Supplies of goods,
Any Tax payments,
Motor Vehicle Licences,
Payment of Police License Collections,
Petty Cash recoups,
Travel expenses,
Stamp purchases,
Freight,
Advertising accounts,
Any other account where discount is applicable, and
Any other Urgent amount of up to $10,000.00.
1.14 Implementation of the Budget
Following the adoption of the budget, the Chief Executive Officer is delegated
authority to use management discretion in -
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
Provisos
implementing expenditure programs contained in the budget the detail of
which has been finalised,
the appointment of consultants and contractors to enable the proper
administration of the Council’s business,
prioritising work, unless otherwise directed by the Council,
determining whether or not to call tenders or sell by tender or auction
where an obligation does not exist to do so under the Act,
initiating arrangements for loans subject to referral to Council for
adoption,
authorising overtime,
engaging temporary staff.
1 That costs are contained within budget allocations.
2 Subject to compliance with the Act and Council’s Policy statements.
3 Tenders for items of plant, equipment and machinery be decided by the
Council.
4 Wherever tenders are called, the tenders be decided by the Council.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 70
5 Quotations are to be obtained on any contract exceeding 10% of the
statutory amount above which tenders are to be called (in Regulation
11(2) of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996)
6 Where quotations are called, under 5 above, the Chief Executive Officer
accept the most advantageous quotation and report details of quotations
received to the next following meeting of the Council.
1.15 Write Offs
That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated authority at his discretion to write
off any amount of money owing for less than $100.00. - Remove and replaced
with 1.21 (58) of Register of Delegations
1.16 Corporate Credit Card
That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated authority for the purpose of using
a Council corporate credit card for Shire related business. This use is
restricted to the purpose of obtaining credit and not cash and is acquitted by
the presentation of receipts within one (1) month of the expenditure being
incurred.
AUTHORISATIONS
1.21 Authorisations under the Local Government Act 1995
Part 3 – Functions of a Local Government
(1) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to pay compensation to the
owner or occupier of property due to damage caused by the Shire of Shark Bay
through the performance of it’s functions under Section 3.22 of the Act.
(2) That the Chief Executive Officer and Works Supervisor be authorised to
exercise powers on behalf of the Local Government under Section 3.24 of the
Act.
(3) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to give an occupier, and the
owner if the owner is not the occupier, notice requiring them to do something
to the land if it is specified in Schedule 3.1. This is in accordance with Section
3.25 (1) of the Act.
(4) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to do whatever they consider to
be necessary to achieve the purpose for which a notice is given, in order to
make the person comply with that notice. This is in accordance with Section
3.26 (2) of the Act.
(5) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to have the Shire of Shark Bay
continue to undertake works that are not carried out by the owner or occupier
and recover the costs as a debt. This is in accordance with Section 3.26 (3) of
the Act.
(6) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to have the Shire of Shark Bay
go onto private land in the circumstances prescribed in Schedule 3.2 and carry
out works, even if the consent of the owner has not been provided. This is in
accordance with Section 3.27 (1) of the Act.
(7) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the power to authorise a person,
after notice has been given, to enter land, premises or thing without consent,
unless the owner or occupier has objected to the entry. This is in accordance
with Section 3.31 (2) of the Act.
(8) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the power to authorise a person
to enter land in an emergency without notice or consent. This is in accordance
with Section 3.34 (1) of the Act.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 71
(9) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to give notice to the owner or
occupier of an intended entry in an emergency whenever it is practical. This is
in accordance with Section 3.34 (5) of the Act.
(10) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the power to authorise a person
to make an opening in a fence to do works on a property subject to providing
the owner or occupier 3 days notice. This is in accordance with Section 3.36 (3)
of the Act.
(11) That the following persons be authorised to exercise powers of entry to land
under Part 3 - Division 3, Subdivision 3 of the Act.
- Chief Executive Officer
- Works Supervisor
(12) That the Chief Executive Officer and Works Supervisor be authorised to remove
and impound goods under Section 3.39 of the Act.
(13) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised, in the instance where a vehicles
has been impounded to remove and impound goods, to allow the offender to
resume control of the vehicle as soon as practicable after goods have been
removed. This is in accordance with Section 3.40 (2) of the Act.
(14) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the power to authorise a person
to remove and impound an abandoned vehicle wreck. This is in accordance
with Section 3.40A (1) of the Act.
(15) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to provide notice to the owner of
a removed abandoned vehicle wreck, advising that the vehicle may be
collected. This is in accordance with Section 3.40A (2) of the Act.
(16) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to declare that a vehicle is an
abandoned vehicle wreck. This is in accordance with section 3.40A (4) of the
Act.
(17) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the power to sell or otherwise
dispose of any goods that have been confiscated under section 3.43. This is in
accordance with Section 3.47 (1) of the Act.
(18) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the power to sell or otherwise
dispose of any vehicle that has not been collected within 2 months of a notice
having been given under section 3.40 (3) or 7 days of a declaration being made
that a vehicle is a wreck. This is in accordance with Section 3.47 (2) of the Act.
(19) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the power to sell or otherwise
dispose of impounded goods that have not been collected within the period
specified in section 3.47 (2b) of the date a notice is given under sections 3.42
(1) (b) or 3.44. This is in accordance with Section 3.47 (2a) of the Act.
(20) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the power to authorise the
humane destruction and disposal of an impounded animal that is ill or injured
to such an extent that treating it is not practicable. This is in accordance with
Section 3.47A (1) of the Act.
(21) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised, in the instance that goods are
removed or impounded under section 3.39 and the offender is convicted, to
recover any expenses incurred in removing and impounding the goods. This is
in accordance with section 3.48 of the Act.
(22) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised close thoroughfares to vehicles,
wholly or partially, for a period not exceeding 4 weeks. This is in accordance
with section 3.50 (1) of the Act.
(23) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to, after providing public notice
of its intentions and reasons, inviting submissions and then considering
submissions, order a thoroughfare to be wholly or partially closed to vehicles
for a period exceeding 4 weeks. This is in accordance with section 3.50 (1a) and
3.50 (4) of the Act.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 72
(24) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to revoke an order to close a
thoroughfare. This is in accordance with section 3.50 (6) of the Act.
(25) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to partially or temporarily close a
thoroughfare, without giving local public notice, if the closure is for the
purpose of carrying out repairs or maintenance and is unlikely to have a
significant adverse effect on users of the thoroughfare. This is in accordance
with section 3.50A of the Act.
(26) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to, by way of public notice,
revoke an order under regulation 6 (1) that closed a thoroughfare or alter it to
make it less restrictive. This is in accordance with Regulation 6 of the Local
government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
(27) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to give notice inviting
submissions and consider those submissions, before fixing, altering or
realigning a public thoroughfare or draining water onto adjoining land. This is
in accordance with section 3.51 (3) of the Act.
(28) If an unvested facility lies within 2 or more districts, the Chief Executive Officer
is authorised to negotiate with the other local government(s) on its control and
management. This is in accordance with section 3.53 (3) of the Act.
(29) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to do anything that Shire of
Shark Bay could do under the Parks and Reserves Act 1895 if it were a board
under that Act, to control and manage any land reserved under the Land Act
1933 and vested in or placed under the control and management of the Shire of
Shark Bay. This is in accordance with section 3.54 (1) of the Act.
(30) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to invite tenders
before the Shire of Shark Bay enters into a contract for goods and services with
a value of $100,000 or more (Functions and General reg 11). This is in
accordance with section 3.57 (1) of the Act.
(31) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority, when inviting
tenders, to determine in writing the criteria for accepted tenders. This is in
accordance with Regulation 14 (2a) of the Local Government (Functions and
General) Regulations 1996.
(32) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to consider any
tender that has not been rejected and decide which one to accept. The Chief
Executive Officer may decline any tender. This is in accordance with Regulation
18 (4) & (5) of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
(33) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority, with the approval of
the tenderer, to make a minor variation in contract for goods and services
before the Shire of Shark Bay enters into a contract with the successful
tenderer. This is in accordance with Regulation 20 of the Local Government
(Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
(34) If the successful tenderer does not want to accept the contract with the
variation or the Shire of Shark Bay and the tenderer cannot reach an agreement,
the Chief Executive Officer is delegated the authority to select the next most
appropriate tenderer. This is in accordance with Regulation 20 (2) of the Local
Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
(35) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to seek expressions
of interest before entering the tender process. This is in accordance with
Regulation 21 (1) of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations
1996.
(36) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to consider any
submissions of interest that have not been rejected and decide which ones
could satisfactorily supply the goods and services. This is in accordance with
Regulation 23 (3) of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations
1996.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 73
(37) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to dispose of
property to the highest bidder at a public auction or the most suitable public
tender. This is in accordance with section 3.58 (2) of the Act.
(38) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to dispose of
property by private treaty following the process set out in section 3.58 (3). This
is in accordance with section 3.58 (3) of the Act.
(39) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the power to declare a disposition
of land as an exempt disposition if the Chief Executive Officer does not
consider that the ownership of the land would be of significant benefit to
anyone other than the transferee. This is in accordance with Regulation 30 (2)
(a) (ii) of the Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996.
Part 5 – Administration
(40) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the power to review all
delegations made to a committee. This is in accordance with section 5.18 of the
Act.
(41) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty to ensure that notice
papers and agenda relating to any council or committee meeting and reports
and other documents tabled at the meeting or which have been produced for
presentation at the meeting are made available to the public at the same time as
they are available to council and committee members. This is in accordance
with Regulation 14 (1) of the Local Government (Administration) Regulations
1996.
(42) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to select a day on
which the general meeting of electors is to be held not more than 56 days after
the local government accepts the annual report from the previous financial
year. This is in accordance with section 5.27 (2) of the Act.
(43) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to designate any
employee to be a senior employee. This is in accordance with section 5.37 (1) of
the Act.
(44) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority, in the instance of
the position of a senior employee becoming vacant, to advertise the position in
the manner and containing such information as prescribed. This is in
accordance with section 5.37 (3) of the Act.
(45) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty to prepare a policy for
employees whose employment is finishing, setting out the circumstances in
which the local government would pay a gratuity and how that gratuity would
be assessed, and give local public notice of the policy. This is in accordance
with section 5.50 (1) of the Act.
(46) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to make a payment
to an employee whose employment is finishing, that is in addition to the
amount set out in its policy, provided local public notice of the payment is
given. This is in accordance with section 5.50 (2) of the Act.
(47) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty to prepare a plan for the
future. This is in accordance with section 5.56 of the Act.
(48) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty to review the Shire of
Shark Bay’s current plan for the future every 2 years. This is in accordance with
regulation 19C of the Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1996.
(49) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to make available for
inspection information prescribed as confidential but only in accordance with
section 5.95 (7) of the Act. This is in accordance with regulation 29A (2) of the
Local Government (Administration) Regulations 1996.
(50) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to approve
expenses which are to be reimbursed to councillors, provided the expenses are

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 74
of the kind prescribed as those which the local government can approve for
reimbursement (subject to section 5.98 (3)). This is in accordance with section
5.98 (2) (b) of the Act.
(51) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to approve the
reimbursement to a council member of an approved expense, either generally
or in a particular case. This is in accordance with section 5.98 (4) of the Act.
(52) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to approve the
reimbursement of expenses to committee members who are not council
members or employees. This is in accordance with section 5.100 (2) of the Act.
(53) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to approve the
reimbursement of expenses to committee members who are not council
members or employees. This is in accordance with section 5.100 (2) of the Act.
(54) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to approve the
reimbursement of expenses to an employee for an expense that was incurred in
relation to a matter affecting the local government. This is in accordance with
section 5.101 (2) of the Act.
(55) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to approve a cash
advance to a person for an expense which can be reimbursed. This is in
accordance with section 5.102 of the Act.
Part 6 – Financial Management
(56) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty to establish and
document personal control procedures to ensure control over investments.
This is in accordance with regulation 19 (1) of the Local Government (Financial
Management) Regulations 1996.
(57) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to transfer money
held in trust for ten years to the Shire of Shark Bay’s Municipal Fund, but in the
event of a person establishing a right to payment of that money, must repay the
money to that person, together with any interest earned on the investment. This
is in accordance with section 6.9 of the Act.
(58) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to waive or grant
concessions in relation to any amount and to write off any amount of money
(less than $100) that is owed to the Shire of Shark Bay (subject to section 6.12
(2)). This is in accordance with section 6.12 (1) (b) of the Act.
(59) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to determine what
conditions apply to the granting of a concession. This is in accordance with
section 6.12 (3) of the Act.
(60) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to invest money in
the Shire of Shark Bay’s municipal fund or trust fund that is not being used, in
accordance with Part III of the Trustees Act 1962 and Policy 6.2 of the Shire of
Shark Bay Policy Manual. This is in accordance with section 6.14 (1) of the Act.
(61) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to make an
agreement with a person to pay their rates and service charges. This is in
accordance with section 6.49 of the Act.
(62) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to determine the due
date that rates and charges become due, but which date cannot be sooner than
35 days after the date noted on the rates record. This is in accordance with
section 6.50 (1) and (2) of the Act.
(63) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the exercisable power to recover
an unpaid rate or service charge and the cost of proceedings in a court of
competent jurisdiction. This is in accordance with section 6.56 (1) of the Act.
(64) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the exercisable power to give
notice to a lessee of land in respect of which there is an unpaid rate or service
charge, requiring the lessee to pay its rent to the local government in

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 75
satisfaction of the rate or service charge. This is in accordance with section
6.60 (2) of the Act.
(65) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty, that in the event that the
Chief Executive Officer gives notice to a lessee under section 6.60 (2), to give a
copy of the notice to the lessor. This is in accordance with section 6.60 (3) of
the Act.
(66) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the exercisable power, that in the
event that the Chief Executive Officer gives notice to a lessee under section
6.60 (2) and the lessee fails to pay the rent to the Shire of Shark Bay, to recover
the rate or service charge as a debt from the lessee. This is in accordance with
section 6.60 (4) of the Act.
(67) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the exercisable power, that in the
event of any rate or service charge having remained unpaid for at least 3 years,
for the Shire of Shark Bay to take possession of the land and hold the land
against a person having an estate or interest in the land, and may lease or sell
the land or transfer it to the Crown itself. This is in accordance with section 6.64
(1) of the Act.
(68) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to lodge a caveat in
respect of any land for which rates and service charges are outstanding. This is
in accordance with section 6.64 (3) of the Act.
(69) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty, that in the event that the
Shire of Shark Bay accepts payment of outstanding rate and service charges
under sections 6.69 (1) or 6.69 (2), to make such notifications and take such
measures as are prescribed to cancel the proposed sale. This is in accordance
with section 6.69 (3) of the Act.
(70) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the exercisable power, in the
event that the Shire of Shark Bay is unable to sell land under Part 6 Division 6
within 12 months, to transfer the land to the crown or the Shire of Shark Bay.
This is in accordance with section 6.71 (1) of the Act.
(71) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty to consider any
objections it receives in relation to a revestment under regulation 77. This is in
accordance with regulation 77 of the Local Government (Financial Management)
Regulations 1996.
(72) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to extend the time
for a person to make an objection in relation to the rate record. This is in
accordance with section 6.76 (4) of the Act.
(73) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to consider any
objections to the rates record and may disallow or allow the objection either
wholly or in part. This is in accordance with section 6.76 (5) of the Act.
(74) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty to provide a person
notice of any decision in relation to an objection to the rates record. This is in
accordance with section 6.76 (6) of the Act.
Part 8 – Scrutiny of the affair of local governments
(75) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty, upon receiving a
request from the Minister for information, to provide the information to the
Minister within the specified time of the notice. This is in accordance with
section 8.2 (2) of the Act.
(76) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty, upon receiving a
request from the Minister for information, to provide the information to the
Minister within the specified time of the notice. This is in accordance with
section 8.2 (2) of the Act.
(77) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty to give the Minister
advice of what things have been do or will be done to comply with an Inquiry

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 76
report from the Minister or a person authorised by the Minister, within 35 days
of the report. This is in accordance with section 8.14 (3) of the Act.
(78) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty to give the Minister
advice of what things have been do or will be done to comply with an Inquiry
Panel’s within 35 days of the report, or provide a comment on a
recommendation to dismiss the council. This is in accordance with section 8.23
(4) of the Act.
Part 9 – Miscellaneous provisions
(79) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty to give a person who has
made an objection to a notice given under section 3.25, notice of how it was
disposed of and reasons why. This is in accordance with section 9.6 (5) of the
Act.
(80) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty to give a person who has
made an objection to a notice given under section 3.25, notice of how it was
disposed of and reasons why. This is in accordance with section 9.6 (5) of the
Act.
(81) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty, as soon as a decision
under section 9.9 (1) (b) is made, to give the effected person written notice
stating the reason for the decision. This is in accordance with section 9.9 (3) of
the Act.
(82) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to appoint persons
or classes of persons to be authorised to perform certain functions and issue
them with a certificate stating that they are authorised. This is in accordance
with section 9.10 (1) & (2) of the Act.
(83) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to exercise powers under
Section 9.13(1) of the Act.
(84) That the following persons be authorised to issue an infringement notice for an
alleged offence against a Regulation or Local Law under Section 9.16 of the
Act -
- Chief Executive Officer
- Works Supervisor
- Manager Regulatory Services
- Finance and Administration Manager
(85) That the Chief Executive Officer and Finance and Administration Manager be
authorised to receive modified penalties under Section 9.17 of the Act.
(86) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to extend the time for payment of
a modified penalty under Section 9.19 of the Act.
(87) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to withdraw an infringement
notice under Section 9.20 of the Act.
(88) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority, in the event that a
dispute has a arisen between the Shire of Shark Bay and another local
government, to refer the matter to the Minister to resolve. This is in accordance
with section 9.63 (1) of the Act.
(90) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to recover accruing
rates from a principal or agent who has failed to give notice in accordance with
section 9.68. This is in accordance with section 9.68 (5) of the Act.
Schedule 2.1 - Provisions about creating, changing the boundaries of, and abolishing
districts.
(91) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority, in the event that the
Shire of Shark Bay is affected by an order made under Schedule 2.1, to
negotiate any adjustment or transfer of property, rights and liabilities. This is in
accordance with clause 11 (2) of Schedule 2.1 of the Act.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 77
Schedule 2.2 – Provisions about names, wards and representation.
(92) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to consider any
submissions made under clause 3 of Schedule 2.2. This is in accordance with
clause 4 (1) of Schedule 2.2 of the Act.
(93) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the duty to carry out a review of
the Shire of Shark Bay’s ward boundaries and the number of councillors every
8 years or as directed by the Advisory Board. This is in accordance with clause
6 of Schedule 2.2 of the Act.
Schedule 6.2 – Provisions relating to lease of land where rates or service
charges unpaid.
(94) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the exercisable power to lease
land with any conditions for a term that does not exceed 7 years. This is in
accordance with clause 1(1) of Schedule 6.2 of the Act.
Schedule 6.3 – Provisions relating to lease of land where rates or service
charges unpaid.
(95) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to appoint a time
which the land may be offered for sale by public auction, not less than 3
months and not more than 12 months from the service of the notice clauses 1
(1) or 1 (2) of schedule 6.3. This is in accordance with clause 1(4) of Schedule
6.3 of the Act.
(96) That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated the authority to transfer or
convey to the purchaser of the land an indefeasible estate fee simple. This is in
accordance with clause 4 of Schedule 6.3 of the Act.
BUILDING MATTERS
Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1960
Section 2 of the Local Government Act 1995 applies as if the provisions of this Act
were in that Act, but in construing the provisions of this Act, account is to be taken
of the meanings they had before the Local Government Act 1995 commenced.
1.31 Unauthorised Structures Procedure
(1) Where any building work or structure is constructed in breach of any provision
of the Building Regulations, the Manager Regulatory Services is delegated
indefinite authority to give notice to the owner in accordance with the following
procedure for the purpose of bringing the building, work or structure into
conformity with the said Regulations.
(2) Notice be given to the owner or builder drawing attention to the existence of a
structure constructed in breach of the provisions of the Regulations and
requiring written explanation within 14 days of the notice.
(3) Provided a satisfactory explanation is received and the relevant action is taken
to comply with the requirements of the notice and Regulations, the Manager
Regulatory Services is authorised to issue a building licence.
(4) Should the owner or builder fail to comply with the requirements of the notice
within the specified time or show good and sufficient reason for not doing so,
the matter shall be placed before the Council.
(5) Where any building work or structure is in breach of the building permit issued,
the Manager Regulatory Services is delegated indefinite authority to issue,
under the hand of the Chief Executive Officer, a stop work order to force the
breach to be addressed under Section 401A of the Local Government
(Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1960.
(6) The Manager Regulatory Services is delegated indefinite authority to lift, under
the hand of the Chief Executive Officer, any stop work order when satisfied the
breach has been rectified.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 78
(7) All stop work orders imposed or lifted shall be reported to the next meeting of
Council.
1.32 Dust and Sand Nuisance
That the Chief Executive Officer be delegated authority to give notice under
Section 3.25(1) of the Local Government Act to an owner or occupier of land
requiring the owner or occupier to take specific measures for preventing or
minimising sand drifts on the land that are likely to adversely affect other land,
provided such notice is reported to the next Ordinary meeting of the Council
with a recommendation as to any further action. - Remove and replaced with
1.21 (3) of Register of Delegations.
1.33 Recovery of Damage to Roads
The Chief Executive Officer is delegated indefinite authority to recover the cost
of repairs to damage caused to roads, kerbing and footpaths, under Section 379
of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1960 or other
appropriate written or unwritten law.
BUILDING SURVEYOR DELEGATION
Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1960
The Section 374(1b) Delegation
Section 374 (1b) of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act provides
-
“The authority to approve or refuse to approve plans and specifications submitted
under this Section may be delegated by a Council to a person appointed to the
office of, Building Surveyor, but where a plan and specifications so submitted
conform to -
(a)
(b)
all Local Laws in force in the relevant district or part of a district in respect of
building matters, and the Council’s predetermined policy in respect of
building matters, and
all Local Laws and Schemes in force in the relevant district or part of a district
in respect of town and regional planning matters, and the Council’s
predetermined policy in respect of town and regional planning matters, the
Building Surveyor shall not refuse to approve that plan or those specifications
without first obtaining consent from the Council.”
2.1 Building Licence Application
(1) The Manager Regulatory Services be delegated indefinite authority under
Section 374(1b) of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1960,
to approve all applications for building licences within the terms of Council
policies where satisfied that the drawings and specifications conform to the
Local Laws, Regulations and Town Planning Scheme requirements applicable.
(2) A summary of building licences issued is to be submitted to Council monthly.
HEALTH
“Powers of Local Authority
Health Act 1911
Council Powers of Delegation
26. Every Local Authority is hereby authorised and directed to carry out within its
district the provisions of the Act and the Regulations, Local Laws, and orders
made thereunder.
Provided that a Local Authority may appoint and authorise any person to be its
deputy, and in that capacity to exercise and discharge all or any of the powers and
functions of the Local Authority for such time and subject to such conditions and

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 79
limitations (if any) as the Local Authority shall see fit from time to time to prescribe,
but so that such appointment shall not affect the exercise or discharge by the Local
Authority itself of any power or function.
(Section 26 amended by No 17 of 1918 Section 5)
3.1 Health Act Offences
The Manager Regulatory Services is delegated indefinite authority pursuant to
Section 26 of the Health Act, to serve such notices as are deemed necessary,
under the hand of the Chief Executive Officer, against breaches of the Health
Act and the Regulations, Local Laws and orders made thereunder, provided
that noncompliance with any notice will be referred to the Council before
proceeding with legal action.
3.2 Dwellings Unfit for Occupation
(1) If, in the opinion of the Manager Regulatory Services, a dwelling occupied by a
person or persons is, by reason of uncleanliness or want of repair, unfit for
human habitation, he is authorised to serve notice under the hand of the Chief
Executive Officer and pursuant to the provisions of the Health Act, directing -
a
b
c
the dwelling not, after a time specified in the notice, be inhabited or
occupied by any person, or
within a specified time to amend the dwelling in accordance with a
schedule of works, or
to take down and remove the dwelling.
(2) Where such notice is served, the Manager Regulatory Services will report the
details of it to the Council at its meeting next succeeding the date of the notice.
3.3 On Site Caravans
That the Chief Executive Officer and Manager Regulatory Services be
authorised under Regulation 6 of the Caravan Parks and Camping Grounds
Regulations to grant approvals under Regulation 11(2) or 12(2) of the
Regulations.
3.4 Dog Control
(1) That the Chief Executive Officer and (Ranger or equivalent) be authorised to
exercise any power conferred on an authorised person by Section 29(1) of the
Dog Act 1976.
(2) That the Chief Executive Officer be authorised to take enforcement proceedings
under Section 44(2) of the Dog Act, including the retaining of legal advice if
considered desirable by the Chief Executive Officer.
PLANNING
4.1 Development Applications
(1) Development within the Shire, existing and any established in the future, is to
be controlled by the provisions of the Town Planning and Development Act and
the Town Planning Scheme Texts where they have been adopted by Council.
The Chief Executive Officer is delegated indefinite authority to process and
approve/reject (in consultation with Council’s planning consultants where
necessary) provided they comply with the provisions of the relevant Town
Planning Scheme.
(2) All applications which are of a contentious nature, or do not comply fully with
the provisions of the Scheme/s or require specific Council approval, will be
referred with recommendation to the Council.
(3) A schedule outlining the applications approved administratively will be
submitted each month to Council.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 80
4.2 Subdivisions - Conditions Applicable
(1) The Chief Executive Officer is delegated indefinite authority to approve
applications for subdivision conforming in all respects to the provisions of the
Town Planning and Development Act, the relevant Town Planning Scheme,
Building Regulations and the Health Act.
(2) Where a proposed subdivision involves a specific relaxation of minimum
standards or is located within a “problem area” as recognised by servicing
authorities, then the subdivision application be referred to the Council for
consideration.
(3) A list of subdivision approvals issued for the preceding month shall be
submitted to each Council meeting.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority.
Date of Report 9 May 2007
Moved Cr Cane
Seconded Cr Hoult
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
18.0 FINANCE
18.1 FINANCIAL REPORTS TO 30 APRIL 2007
Author
Finance and Administration Manager
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Comment
As per the requirements of Section 6.4 of the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulation
34 of the Local Government Accounting (Financial Management) Regulations 1996, the
following monthly financial reports to 30 April 2007 are attached.
1 Municipal Fund Summary of Financial Activity
2 Operating Statement
3 Statement of Financial Position
4 Significant Variances - Actual versus Budget
5 Variances to Budget
6 Detailed Schedules 3 to 14
7 General Purpose Income - Schedule 1
8 Statement of Rating Information - Schedule 2
9 Bank Reconciliation
For Councillors convenience a summary of financial activity has been prepared as below.
Current Cash Position as per Bank Statements
Municipal
Bank Statement Municipal Fund 8,539
Bank Statement Cash Management 996,577
1,005,116

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 81
Trust
Bank Statement Trust Account 40,731
Reserves
Long Service Leave Reserve Term Deposit 68,208
Office Replacement Reserve Term Deposit 47,792
Pensioner Unit Reserve Term Deposit 143,638
Recreation Facility Replacement/Upgrade Reserve 135,651
Plant Replacement Reserve 40,731
436,021
Total Municipal, Trust and Reserves 1,481,867
Current Operating Position
Change in Net Assets resulting from Operations as per
Operating Statement as at 30 April 2007 111,696
Current Operating Position as per Municipal Fund
Summary as at 30 April 2007 1,141,552
Recommendation
That the monthly financial reports to 30 April 2007 as attached be received.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 23 May 2007
Moved Cr Hoult
Seconded Cr Crawford
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
18.2 SCHEDULE OF ACCOUNTS FOR PAYMENT
Author
Finance and Administration Manager
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Comment
The schedules of accounts to be passed for payment covering -
1 Municipal Fund Account Cheque Numbers 23544 to 23572 totalling $28,412.07
2 Municipal Fund Account Electronic Payment Numbers EFT5025 to EFT5097 totalling
$129,897.10
3 Municipal Fund Account Payroll for April 2007 totals $65,907.00
4 Trust Police Licensing Direct Debit totalling $24,620.15
submitted to each member of Council on 24 May 2007 have been checked and are fully
supported by vouchers and invoices which are submitted herewith, and which have been
duly certified as to the receipt of goods and rendition of services as to prices, computations
and costings, and the amounts shown are due for payment.
Recommendation
That the cheques and electronic payments as per the attached schedules of accounts
for payment totalling $248,836.32 be passed for payment.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 82
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 23 May 2007
Moved Cr Hoult
Seconded Cr Cane
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
18.3 SALE OF MERCHANDISE AT SHARK BAY WORLD HERITAGE DISCOVERY CENTRE BU 106.03
Author
Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil.
Background
Council will be aware that at its Ordinary meeting dated 25 October 2006 (Item 17.1) it
resolved to sell additional book publications/merchandise at the Centre such as The
Buccaneers Bell, Patterns of Nature and Shark Bay Days.
Council also resolved at its Ordinary meeting dated 28 March 2007 (Item 17.3) to -
Delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to determine what items will be considered
by Council for sale in the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre and that this
determination be based on items that are of high quality and particularly specific to the
World Heritage Area and/or maritime history as depicted in the Shark Bay World Heritage
Discovery Centre.
Accordingly the Chief Executive Officer believes that both these publications have a direct
relevance to the contents of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre.
Comment
Council has received a request from Dr Phillip Playford for the sale of his two publications
Carpet of Silver The Wreck of the Zuytdorp which is available through UWA Press in
hardback edition and Voyage of Discovery to Terra Australis by Willem de Vlamingh in
1696-97, in softcover published by the Western Australian Museum. The wholesale prices
of each publication, and the recommended retail sale prices, are detailed below in Financial
Implications.
Legal Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Wholesale price of the publication Carpet of Silver The Wreck of the Zuytdorp from UWA
Press is $27.00 with a recommended retail sale price of $45.00.
Wholesale price of the publication Voyage of Discovery to Terra Australis by Willem de
Vlamingh in 1696-97 from WA Museum Press is $21.00 with a recommended retail sale
price of $35.00
Strategic Implications
Nil.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 83
Recommendation
That Council -
1 Adopt the following retail prices under Fees and Charges for the following
books/merchandise on the Shark Bay region -
1 Carpet of Silver The Wreck of the Zuytdorp $40.00
2 Voyage of Discovery to Terra Australis by Willem de Vlamingh $35.00
in 1696-97
2 Place a notice in the Northern Guardian newspaper and on the Shire of Shark
Bay noticeboard of Council's intention to introduce the sale charges and the
effective date.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 18 May 2007
Moved Cr Hoult
Seconded Cr Blennerhassett
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
18.4 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AND DONATION REQUESTS FOR 2007/08 BU 101.02
Author
Finance and Administration Manager
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Background
Applications were sought from community groups and sporting clubs that may require
assistance from the Council during 2007/08 in the March Inscription Post. Applications
closed on 20 April 2007. A total of ten applications were received by the closing date. The
Shire of Shark Bay has a Financial Assistance/Donation Policy which outlines the broad
guidelines, selection criteria, acquittals, the timing of and goods and service tax implications
with regards to financial assistance and donation requests.
Comment
The applications were assessed by a panel consisting of Cr Robert Blennerhassett (due to
Cr Ken Gordon not being available), the Chief Executive Officer, Mr Kelvin Matthews, and
the Finance and Administration Manager, Mr Stan Kocian.
All the applications were assessed against the following selection criteria -
• Applicant must be a non-profit organisation.
• Applicant must ensure that the community will benefit from the donation.
• Applicant must be an elector or operate in the Shire of Shark Bay and Gascoyne
District, with preference given to electors in the Shire of Shark Bay.
• Donation requests previously funded will be given a low priority.
• No organisation will receive more than guideline percentage of the total financial
assistance/donation category expense budget.
• Cash donations of $1,000 or more require an annual acquittal.
• Applicants must be able to demonstrate attempts to source other relevant funding.
• No application will be considered outside of the allocated timeframes.
• All submissions will be in respect of the determined financial year’s budget only.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 84
• Organisations which demonstrate their own fundraising attempts will be favourably
considered.
• The Council reserves the right to accept or reject submissions.
• Unexpended funds must be returned to the Shire of Shark Bay at the end of the
financial year.
• Annual allocation thresholds per applicant for each category.
The Donation Review Panel has reviewed the applications against the selection criteria and
put forward the following recommendations -
Shark Bay Bowling Club
• Has made an application under the Community Events category for its 17 th
Anniversary Carnival Weekend. Funds are to go towards prizes and running costs to
the total of $1,000.
The panel’s view is that the application meets the criteria of being a community event
and benefiting the community. The amount requested is below the threshold of 25%
of the $18,000 annual allocation for community events.
Tracking Back Program
• $250 funding for Hall Hire, which is within the threshold of this category.
• $1,000 for Bus Hire, which is within the threshold for this category.
• $2,000 under the Seniors Program category for those not eligible for HACC, which is
within the threshold for this category.
• $500 towards a senior’s trip to Kalbarri under the Seniors Projects category, which is
within the threshold for this category.
The panel’s view is that the application is for worthwhile projects and programs for the
seniors citizens of the Shark Bay community.
Shark Bay RSL
• $110 Hall Hire for a community dance.
The request is within the threshold for this category and fulfils the community benefit
requirement.
• $1,500 under the Community Events category for a Remembrance Day luncheon.
This request is within the threshold for this category and fulfils the community benefit
requirement.
• $1,000 under the Youth Projects Scheme for a scholarship for a memorial tour.
This request is within the threshold for this category. The panel feels this application
fulfils the community benefit requirement as it is encouraging the youth to gain a
greater knowledge, respect and understanding of the past.
• $1,000 under the Historical Projects Category to be used towards the upgrading of
Pioneer Park.
The panel decided it would not be appropriate to fund this request, as a major
upgrade of Pioneer Park is planned by the Shire in consultation with the community
and the RSL and has been included in the Shire’s Plan for the Future document.
Shark Bay Arts Council Inc
• $4,162.50 under the Community Events category to help fund annual Market Fair
Days for the community and visiting travellers on 15 and 16 July each year to coincide
with the Farwestern Championships. The funds requested from the Shire will be
expended on travel, accommodation and food expenses for performers who will be
the main attractions on the days.
This request is within the threshold for this category and fulfils the community benefit
requirement.
Boolbardie Country Club Inc
It should be noted that Cr Blennerhassett declared an interest in this application in view of
the fact that he is a current committee member of Boolbardie Country Club Inc. He did not
participate in any discussion of this application.
• $500 under the Cash Donation category for the purchase of club merchandise to be
on-sold.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 85
The Panel’s view is that this request should not be funded by the Shire as such
activities were not intended to be supported by the donation financial assistance
program and it would be an inappropriate use of Shire funds to do so.
• $1,415 under the Sporting Club Assistance category to go towards the purchase of a
2000 litre water tank, heavy duty rakes for sand greens and new flags for greens.
This request is within the threshold for this category.
• $500 under the Community Events category for Shire sponsorship of the annual
Denham Open.
This request is within the threshold for this category.
Denham Occasional Care
• $493.97 under the Cash Donation category for the purchase of materials (paints,
brushes, scissors, paper etc) for children to use on Wednesdays, Thursdays and
Fridays.
This request is within the threshold for this category and in the view of the panel
satisfies the community benefit category.
• $2,215.18 under the Youth Project and Programs category for the purchase of a 25
metre shade cloth and associated materials to be erected on the east side of the Day
Care building from the eaves to the fence.
This request is within the threshold for this category and will benefit the users of the
facility (day care and playgroup) by providing much needed shade.
St Andrews Anglican Church
• $110 under the Hall Hire category for a community carols service.
This request is within the threshold for this category and fulfils the community benefit
requirement.
Shark Bay Community Resource Centre
• $700.00 under the Cash Donation to go towards the airfares of the coordinator to
attend a conference in Melbourne.
Whilst the request is within the threshold for this category it is the panel’s view that it
would not be appropriate use of funds by the Shire to fund an individual's attendance
at a course to further their personal professional development.
The above recommendations total $16,256.65 Financial Assistance to Community Clubs
and Groups for programs, projects, events and in-kind and cash support. Further
allocations will be recommended after the September 2007 round of applications.
Legal Implications
Nil.
Policy Implications
Policy 6.10 - The process of allocations has been in accordance with the Financial
Assistance and Donations Policy.
Financial Implications
Assists in setting the budgets allocations for the 2007/08 financial year. Policy 6.10 states
that a total of $60,000 be made available through the financial assistance/donation program
to individuals, community groups and organisations each financial year.
Strategic Implications
Provides an equitable and transparent approach to assisting Community Groups and Clubs.
Recommendation
That Council -
1 Accept the following recommendations of the Donations Review Panel -
Shark Bay Bowling Club $ 1,000 Community Events
Tracking Back Program $ 250 Hall Hire
Tracking Back Program $ 1,000 Bus Hire

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 86
Tracking Back Program $ 2,000 Seniors Program
Tracking Back Program $ 500 Seniors Project
Shark Bay RSL $ 110 Hall Hire
Shark Bay RSL $ 1,500 Community Events
Shark Bay RSL $ 1,000 Youth Projects
Shark Bay Arts Council $ 4,162 Community Events
Boolbardie Country Club $ 1,415 Sporting Club
Boolbardie Country Club $ 500 Community Events
Denham Occasional Care $ 494 Cash Donation
Denham Occasional Care $ 2,215 Youth Projects
St Andrews Anglican Church $ 110 Hall Hire
2 Make the above allocations in the 2007/08 budget under the various Financial
Assistance categories
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 9 May 2007
Moved Cr Crawford
Seconded Cr Hoult
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
18.5 RATES - DIFFERENTIAL RATES RA 106
Author
Finance and Administration Manager
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Background
Should the Shire of Shark Bay wish to impose a differential general rate it must give local
public notice as per Section 1.7 of the Local Government Act 1995 of its intention within the
period of two (2) months proceeding the commencement of the financial year (ie on or after
1 May).
An elector or ratepayer is invited to lodge a submission in respect of the proposed rate or
minimum payment within twenty one (21) days of the notice being published. The Local
Government is required to consider any submissions received before imposing the
proposed rate.
A differential rate is defined under Section 6.33 (1) of the Local Government Act 1995 -
“A local government may impose differential general rates according to any, or a
combination, of the following characteristics-
(a) the purpose for which the land is zoned under a town planning scheme in force under
the Town Planning and Development Act 1928;
(b) The predominant purpose for which the land is held or used as determined by the
local government;
(c) Whether or not the land is vacant land; or
(d) Any other characteristic or combination of characteristics prescribed.’
Section 6.33 (3) of the Local Government Act 1995 also applies -
“In imposing a differential general rate a local government is not, without the approval of the
Minister, impose a differential general rate which is more than twice the lowest differential
general rate imposed by it.”

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 87
In the 2006/2007 financial year, 67 Local Governments utilised differential rating. The use
of differential rates and specified area rates provides Local Government with flexibility to
achieve equity in their revenue raising.
The Shire of Shark Bay has previously imposed a differential rate in accordance with Sub
Division 2 of Division 6 of the Local Government Act 1995. If the Shire wishes to impose a
differential rate again this year, local public notice must be given and contain the following
information -
(a) details of each rate or minimum payment the Local Government intends to
impose;
(b) an invitation for submissions to be made by an elector or ratepayer in respect of
the proposed rate or minimum payment and any related matters within 21 days of the
notice; and
(c) any further information in relation to matters specified in the above which may
be prescribed.
In the 2006/2007 financial year the Shire of Shark Bay imposed the following differential
rates -
Rates Category Minimum Rates Rate in the Dollar
($) (¢)
Gross Rental Value (GRV) 338.00 8.5148
Unimproved Value (UV) 320.00 14.6595
Unimproved Pastoral 320.00 3.1792
These differential rates resulted in the rates model below.
Non Minimum Rates
Land
Category
Rate in the
Dollar
Number
of
Properties
Percentage of
Properties in
Category
Rates
Levied
Average
Rates per
Assessment
GRV 8.5148 cents 423 82 % $414,387 $979.64
UV 14.6596 cents 33 92 % $229,265 $6,947.42
UV Pastoral 3.1792 cents 13 100 % $17,804 $1,369.54
Total 469 $661,456
Minimum Rates
Land Category
Minimum
Number of
Properties
Percentage
of Properties
in Category
Rates Levied
GRV $338.00 94 18% $31,772
UV $320.00 3 8% $960
Total 97 $32,732
Total rates levied on 566 properties was $694,188.
Comment
When striking the rate in the dollar, Local Governments generally adopt a practice of
applying the rate of inflation.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) has historically been accepted as the most accurate
indicator of inflation in the Australian Economy. To the end of the March quarter 2007 the
annualised national CPI growth was 2.4%, whilst for Perth it was 3.52%.
In recent times the Western Australian Local Government Association (WALGA) has
developed the Local Government Cost Index (LGCI) to provide a more accurate guidance
on price changes for the Local Government sector than the CPI. The LGCI is created by
combining 30% of the change in the Construction Index with 70% of the Perth CPI. The

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 88
LGCI does not reflect changes in wages, primarily because the Local Government sector
wage growth tends to lag behind other sectors in the economy.
While the CPI is widely recognised it does not reflect the general costs associated with
Local Government activities that tend not to make purchases synonymous with the average
Australian household. The LGCI indicates that CPI understates Local Government cost by
approximately 10% during the last decade.
To the end of the March quarter 2007 the annualised LGCI growth was 5.38% and the State
Government has forecast that the annualised LGCI growth will be 4.1% during 2007/2008.
If the budgeted cash operating expenditure (ie budgeted operating expenditure less
depreciation and other non-cash items) for 2006/2007 is multiplied by the forecast LGCI the
result is that in real terms it will cost the Shire an additional $110,945.22 to operate at the
same level in 2007/2008 as in 2006/2007.
It is recommended that a 4% increase in the average rates per assessment be implemented
for 2007/2008. This increase will provide the Shire with an additional $49,333.76 in rates
revenue.
Details of the draft proposal of rates for 2007/2008, including a 4% rate increase, are as
follows -
Rates Category Minimum Rates Rate in the Dollar
($) (¢)
Gross Rental Value (GRV) 351.00 8.8554
Unimproved Value (UV) 333.00 15.2459
Unimproved Pastoral 333.00 3.3092
These differential rates result in the rates model below -
Non Minimum Rates
Land
Category
Rate
in the
Dollar
Number
Of
Properties
Percentage
of
Properties
in Category
Rates
Levied
Average
Rates per
Assessment
Percentage
Increase in
Average per
Assessment
GRV 8.8554 ¢ 428 76 % $437,053.97 $1,021.15 4%
UV 15.2459 ¢ 33 92 % $238,514.09 $7,227.70 4%
UV
Pastoral
3.3064 ¢ 13 100 % $18,516.00 $1,424.36 4%
Minimum Rates
Land Category
Total 474 $694,084.76
Minimum
Number of
Properties
Percentage
of Properties
in Category
Rates Levied
GRV $351.00 138 24% $48,438
UV $333.00 3 8% $999
Total 141 $49,437
Total rates levied on 615 properties will be $743,521.76.
Legal Implications
Sub Division 2 of Division 6 under Part 6 of the Local Government Act 1995. Section 1.7 of
the Local Government Act 1995. Section 6.37 (2) (a) & (b) and Section 6.36 (5) (b) of the
Local Government Act 1995.
Policy Implications
Nil

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 89
Financial Implications
Ensuring that rate revenue remains at a level where the Shire can maintain its present level
of service to ratepayers.
Strategic Implications
Rates revenue makes up approximately 15% of the Shire’s total revenue and as such has
an impact on the Shire’s strategic planning.
Recommendation
That Council -
1 Advertise in The West Australian the Shire of Shark Bay’s Notice of Intention to
Levy the following Differential Rates in accordance with Section 6.36 of the
Local Government Act 1995.
Rates Category Minimum Rates Rate in the Dollar
($) (¢)
Gross Rental Value (GRV) 351.00 8.8554
Unimproved Value (UV) 333.00 15.2459
Unimproved Pastoral 333.00 3.3092
2 If no submissions are received after the expiration of the 21 days required for
the public to make submissions on the above advertisement, Council seek
Ministerial approval for differential rating in accordance with Section 6.23 of the
Local Government Act 1995.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority Required.
Date of Report 21 May 2007
Moved Cr Cane
Seconded Cr Crawford
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
18.6 FEES AND CHARGES 2007/08 FE 102 PE 101
Author
Finance and Administration Manager
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil
Background
In accordance with Section 6.16 of the Local Government 1995, a Local Government may
impose and recover a fee or charge for any goods or service it provides or proposes to
provide, other than a service for which a service charge is imposed. Fees and charges are
to be imposed (generally) when adopting the annual budget and must be resolved by an
absolute majority.
In determining the amount of a fee or charge for a service or for goods a Local Government
is required to take into account the following factors (Section 6.17) -
(a)
(b)
(c)
the cost to the Local Government of providing the service or goods;
the importance of the service or goods to the community; and
the price at which the service or goods could be provided by an alternative provider.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 90
Fees and charges can be imposed or amended during the year but only by an absolute
majority decision of Council and after public notice is given.
Comment
A general across the board increase has been made to Shire Fees and Charges of 4%.
The Sanitation charges for Domestic Rubbish Removal and Commercial Tip Levy will be
reviewed and presented to Council once full expense cost of service has been ascertained.
A full schedule of the proposed fees and charges is attached.
Legal Implications
Section 6.16 of the Local Government Act 1995 enables a Local Government to impose and
recover a fee or charge for any goods or service it provides or proposes to provide.
Section 6.19 of the Local Government Act 1995 required public notice if fees and charged
adopted after budget.
Policy Implications
Division 6 - Finance - Section 8 - Budget deliberations process.
Financial Implications
The fees and charges have been reviewed by the management team to ensure that revenue
is maintained at the required level to meet service needs.
Strategic Implications
The level of fees and charges has been set in accordance with the principle of price
elasticity of demand. That is, the fees and charges are relatively low to ensure that there is
no price ‘disincentive’ for people to use Shire facilities.
Recommendation
That Council adopt and incorporate the following Schedule of Fees and Charges
effective from 1 July 2007 in the 2007/08 budget document -
Actual Budget General
Function Charge Charge Ledger
Program Particulars 2006/07 2007/08 GST Frequency A/c
$ $
GENERAL PURPOSE INCOME
Ex Gratia Rates
Rate Book Enquiry (Non Ratepayer) 35.00 36.40 N Per Enquiry 103765
Rate Instalment Fee 6.00 6.25 N Per Instalment 103767
Rate Payment Arrangement Fee 17.60 18.30 N Per Arrangement 103768
Other Income
Scanning - Printing
Black and White 7.20 7.50 Y Per Picture 403779
Colour 11.55 12.00 Y Per Picture
Scanning - Copying to Disk
Disk Supplied by Requestor 7.20 7.50 Y Per Picture
Disk Supplied by Shire 9.90 10.30 Y Per Picture
Printing
Black and White - Plain Paper 1.75 1.80 Y Per Sheet
Colour - Plain Paper 4.40 4.60 Y Per Sheet
Colour - Photo Quality Paper 7.20 7.50 Y Per Sheet
Photocopying
A4 Sheet - Colour 4.10 4.25 Y Per Sheet
A4 Sheet - 1-99 copies
- Single sided .55 .60 Y Per Sheet 403755
- Double sided .75 .80 Y Per Sheet
A4 Sheet - 100-199 copies
- Single sided .50 .55 Y Per Sheet
- Double sided .70 .75 Y Per Sheet
A4 Sheet - 200 plus copies
- Single sided .45 .50 Y Per Sheet
- Double sided .65 .70 Y Per Sheet
A3 Sheet - Colour 4.80 5.20 Y Per Sheet
A3 Sheet - 1-99 copies

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 91
Actual Budget General
Function Charge Charge Ledger
Program Particulars 2006/07 2007/08 GST Frequency A/c
$ $
- Single sided .80 .85 Y Per Sheet
- Double sided 1.05 1.10 Y Per Sheet
A3 Sheet - 100-199 copies
- Single sided .65 .70 Y Per Sheet
- Double sided .85 .90 Y Per Sheet
A3 Sheet - 200 plus copies
- Single sided .55 .60 Y Per Sheet
- Double sided .75 .80 Y Per Sheet
St Andrews Church circular (A4)
- Single sided .50 .55 Y Per Sheet
- Double sided .60 .65 Y Per Sheet
- Please note scanning and photocopying services
are only available through the Shire’s financial
assistance and donations program.
GOVERNANCE
Members of Council
Agendas and Minutes
Battye Library, Twin City Denham No Charge No Charge Y
UK
All others (where postage
38.00 39.50 Y Per Annum 5203713
applicable)
Sale of Electoral Rolls 21.00 21.85 Y Per Copy 5203721
Rate Book 21.00 21.85 Y Per Copy 103765
Freedom of Information Fees Per Application 5203727
Application fee for other application 30.00 30.00 N
(non personal)
Charge for time taken by staff
dealing with the application (per
hour or pro rata for a part of an
hour)
30.00 30.00 N Per Hour
Charge for access time supervised
by staff.
Plus actual additional cost to the
agency of any special
arrangements
Charge for photocopying - per hour
or pro rata for a part of an hour of
staff time
Charge for time taken by staff
transcribing information from a tape
or other device (per hour or pro rata
for part of an hour)
Charge for duplicating tape, film or
computer information
Charge for delivery, packaging and
postage
30.00
Actual
Cost
30.00+
.20c/copy
30.00 N
30.00 +
.20c/copy
N
N
Per Hour
Per Sheet
30.00 30.00 N Per Hour
Actual
Cost
Actual
Cost
Actual Cost
Actual Cost
LAW, ORDER AND PUBLIC SAFETY
Animal Control
Dogs - as prescribed by Regulations
Registration Fees (3 Years)*
Unsterilised Dog 75.00 75.00 N Per 3 Year 10203858
Sterilised Dog 18.00 18.00 N Per 3 Year
Unsterilised Working Farm Dog - 18.75 18.75 N Per 3 Year
25%
Sterilised Working Farm Dog - 25% 4.50 4.50 N Per 3 Year
Registration Fees (1 Year)*
Unsterilised Dog 30.00 30.00 N Per Annum
Sterilised Dog 10.00 10.00 N Per Annum
Unsterilised Working Farm Dog - 7.50 7.50 N Per Annum
25%
Sterilised Working Farm Dog - 25% 2.50 2.50 N Per Annum
Guide Dog 0.00 0.00 N Per Annum
*NB - Pensioners' half fee.
Sterilisation papers must be
produced to claim discount
Infringement Notices -
as prescribed by Regulations
Other - Impounding Fees 40.00 40.00 N Per Infringement 10203810
- Sustenance Fees Actual
Cost
11.00 Y Per Day 10203719
N
N

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 92
Actual Budget General
Function Charge Charge Ledger
Program Particulars 2006/07 2007/08 GST Frequency A/c
$ $
Animal Handling Equipment
- Small Nylon Dog Muzzle 18.00 18.00 Y 10203701
- Medium Nylon Dog Muzzle 20.00 20.00 Y
- Large Nylon Dog Muzzle 22.00 22.00 Y
- Dangerous Dog Collars 29.00 29.00 Y
- Dangerous Dog Sign (Metal) 42.00 42.00 Y
- Dangerous Dog Sign (Paper) 7.50 7.50 Y
Other Law, Order and Public Safety
Impounding Fees - Vehicles
Administration Fee 100.00 110.00 Y Per Infringement 10303820
Daily Fee 10.00 11.00 Y Per Day
Towing Charge N/A Actual Cost Y
Impounding Fees - Illegal Signs
Administration Fee 30.00 33.00 Y Per Infringement 10303823
Parking Infringement Notices -
as prescribed by Regulations
HEALTH
Health Services
Offensive Trade Licence - Fish
231.00 231.00 N Per Financial Yr 15103875
Processing
Septic Tank Application Fees 100.00 92.00 N Per Application 15103884
Local Government Report Fee N/A N Per Report 15103884
Inspection Fee
- For 1 or 2 major fixtures N/A Y Per Inspection 15103784
- Each additional major fixture N/A Y Per Inspection
Re-inspection Fee N/A Y Per Inspection
Issue of Permit to Use Septic Tank 100.00 92.00 Y Per Permit
Apparatus
Copy of Septic Tank Plans 25.00 25.00 Y Per Copy of Plan
Collection, Disposal and Removal of 200.00 200.00 N Per Annum 15103884
Sewerage
Itinerant Food Vendors
- Licence 50.00 50.00 N Per Annum 15103870
- Application 30.00 30.00 N Per Application
Public Building Permit (Meeting Place) 100.00 100.00 N Per Application
Section 39 Liquor Act Certification Local
Authority
100.00 100.00 N Per Application 30303867
HOUSING
Pensioner Units
(tied to HomesWest rental rates)
Rental - Single 176.00 183.00 N Per Fortnight Various
Rental - Double 273.00 284.00 N Per Fortnight
COMMUNITY AMENITIES
Town Planning
Home Occupation Licence
Application Fee 150.00 150.00 N Per Application 30303865
Annual Renewal Fee 50.00 50.00 N Per Financial Yr
Section 40 Certificate for Liquor
100.00 50.00 N Per Application 30303866
Licensing
Issue of written planning advice 50.00 50.00 N Per Advice 30303759
Reply to Property Settlement
100.00 50.00 N Per Advice 30303761
Questionnaire (Orders &
Requisitions)
Development Application Approval 30303716
Change of use where no building 200.00 200.00 N
work is proposed
Determination of Development
Application (other than for an
extractive industry) where the
estimated cost of the
development is -
- Value of Project not more 100.00 100.00 N Of Project Value
than $50,000
- Value of Project $50,000
but no more than $500,000
.23% 0.23% N Of Project Value

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 93
Actual Budget General
Function Charge Charge Ledger
Program Particulars 2006/07 2007/08 GST Frequency A/c
$ $
- Value of Project $500,000
but not more than
$2,500,000
- Value of Project
$2,500,000 but not more
than $5,000,000
- Value of Project
$5,000,000 but not more
than $21,500,000
1,150.00
+ 0.18%
for every
$1 in
excess of
$500,000
4,750.00
+ 0.15%
for every
$1 in
excess of
$2,500,000
8,500.00
+ 0.10%
for every
$1 in
excess of
$5,000,000
1,150.00
+ 0.18% for
every $1 in
excess of
$500,000
4,750.00
+ 0.15% for
every $1 in
excess of
$2,500,000
8,500.00
+ 0.10% for
every $1 in
excess of
$5,000,000
N
N
N
Of Project Value
Of Project Value
Of Project Value
- Value of Project more than 25,000.00 25,000.00 N
$21,500,000
Determination of Development 500.00 500.00 N
Application for an Extractive
Industry
Zoning Certificate 50.00 50.00 N Per Application
Subdivision Clearance
- Not more than 5 Lots 50.00 50.00 N
- More than 5 Lots but not
more than 195 Lots
50.00
per Lot for
first 5 Lots
then $25
per Lot
50.00
per Lot for
first 5 Lots
then $25 per
Lot
- More than 195 Lots 5,000.00 5,000.00 N
Reconsideration of previous
application or amendment to a
previous approval in response
to a request received within 60
days of receipt of Council’s
original decision
50% 50% N Of Original Fee
Residential buildings of 2 or more
dwelling units
- rate to be charged on value
of development
Advertising Charges for SA & AA
uses
- advertisement cost plus 15%
administration fee
N
.05% 0.05% N
Scheme Amendments and Rezonings 30303781
See Scheme Amendments Fee
N
Structure at end of Fees and
Charges
Refund % fee paid if unsuccessful 40% 40%
prior to advertising period
Structure Plans/Developments 30303791
See Scheme Amendments Fee
N
Structure at end of Fees and
Charges
Y
Cemetery
"Right of Burial"
Application Fee 30.00 30.00 Y 30403706
Sinking Fees – Adult 330.00 330.00 Y
Sinking Fees – Adult
500.00 500.00 Y
(Weekend/Public Holidays)
Niche Wall Internments – First 33.00 33.00 Y
– Second 33.00 33.00 Y
– Reservation 22.00 22.00 Y
“Cast Bronze Plaques and Engraving”
Backing Plaque (270 mm x 230 mm) 465.00 465.00 Y
First Plaque (210 mm x 80 mm) 305.00 305.00 Y
Second Plaque (210 mm x 80 mm) 305.00 305.00 Y
Memorial Plaque (270 mm x 230 495.00 495.00 Y
mm)
Additional Four Lines of Engraving 37.00 37.00 Y

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 94
Actual Budget General
Function Charge Charge Ledger
Program Particulars 2006/07 2007/08 GST Frequency A/c
$ $
Application for Mausoleum 58.00 58.00 Y
Funeral Director's Licence 75.00 75.00 N 30403860
Single Funeral Permit 50.00 50.00 N
Application for Monumental Mason's 50.00 50.00 N
Licence
Application for placement of
Monumental Plaques along
Cemetery fence
30.00 30.00 Y
Sanitation
Rubbish Bins - 240 litre At Cost 93.50 Y Per Bin 30203775
Parts for Bins – Wheels & Axles; Lids & At Cost At Cost
Lid Pins
Refuse removal
120 or 240 litre Rubbish Bins
235.00 To be N Per Annum 30103769
collected Twice Weekly
determined
Rubbish Tip Levy Commercial
To be
determined
Commercial Establishments 6.05 To be N Per Cubic Metre 30203710
determined
Restaurant /Cafe 679.00 To be Per
30203710
determined Restaurant/Cafe
Holiday Unit/Unit 68.00 To be Unit 30203710
determined
Licensed Premises 1997.00 To be Premises 30203710
determined
Supermarkets 907.00 To be Supermarket 30203710
determined
Service Stations 1814.00 To be Service Station 30203710
determined
Caravan and Camp Sites 34.00 To be Site 30203710
determined
Public Tourist Area 1132.00 To be Area 30203710
determined
Other Shops and Offices 235.00 To be Shop or Office 30203710
determined
Commercial Businesses 235.00 To be Business 30203710
determined
Caretakers Residence 235.00 To be Caretaker 30203710
determined Residence
Asbestos Disposal
Burial of Asbestos 100.00 100.00 Y
+ 15.00 + 15.00 Y Per Cubic Metre
RECREATION AND CULTURE
Public Halls and Civic Centres
Denham Hall Hire
Functions/Meetings Community
Groups
- Over 3 hours 110.00 140.00 Y Per Function 35103910
- Less than or Equal to 3 hours 15.00 16.00 Y Per Hour
Functions/Meetings Private
- Over 3 hours 220.00 230.00 Y Per Function
- Less than or Equal to 3 hours 30.00 31.00 Y Per Hour
Cleaning Deposit 200.00 208.00 Y Per Function
Surcharge for Additional Cleaning At Cost At Cost Y Per Function
Long Term Seasonal Users –
Community Groups
- Once a Week User 330.00 345.00 Y Annual Charge
- Twice or More a Week User 660.00 685.00 Y Annual Charge
Table Hire 2.00 2.10 Y Per Unit Per Day 35103795
Chair Hire 1.00 1.05 Y Per Unit Per Day
Crockery 13.00 13.50 Y Per Day
Urn 5.00 5.20 Y Per Day
Whiteboard 12.00 12.50 Y Per Day
PA System 30.00 31.00 Y Per Unit Per Day
Multi Media Equipment Hire 6.00 6.25 N Per Week (Trust) 73206672
Overlander Hall Equipment Hire
Functions as per Denham Hall Per Function 35103938

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 95
Actual Budget General
Function Charge Charge Ledger
Program Particulars 2006/07 2007/08 GST Frequency A/c
$ $
Mini Golf Centre
Yadgalah Club responsible for all 110.00 114.00 Y Per Annum 35103955
maintenance and operating
costs of the building and
surrounds
DSA Shed
Yadgalah Club responsible for all
Y Per Annum 35103955
maintenance and operating
costs of the building and
surrounds
Overlander Hall Hire
Town & Country Club 110.00 114.00 Y Per Annum 35103955
Community Centre
Child Care Programs 33.00 34.00 Y Per Month 35103906
Denham Crafters 29.70 31.00 Y Per Month
Other Recreation and Sport
Tennis Courts
Court Hire
- Tennis Club 110.00 114.00 Y Per Annum 35303916
- Individuals 2.50 2.60 Y Per Session
Tennis Equipment
Hire of Community Bus
.85 .90 Y Per Kilometre 35303736
(Fuel costs met by Shire)
- Bus Bond 300.00 310.00 Y Per Annum/Hire 73206678
Hire of Shade Shelters 42.00 43.70 Y Per Day 35303737
- Waived for local non profit groups
- Waived for Shire run events
- Deposit (Non Residents) 110.00 114.00 N Trust 73206674
Hire of Marquee
- Community Groups 115.00 120.00 Y Per Event 35303738
- Individuals 550.00 572.00 Y Per Event
- Council Staff to Erect/Dismantle At Cost At Cost Y Per Event
- Deposit - All Hirers 575.00 598.00 N Trust
Denham Oval Hire 35303913
Exclusive use charge (Clubs) 42.00 43.70 Y Per Day
Exclusive use charge (Carnivals) 368.00 382.00 Y Per Event
Camping (caravan parks' overflow)
Unpowered Tent (up to 2
persons)
11.55 12.00 Y Per Day
Caravan (up to 2 persons) 14.00 14.60 Y Per Day
Additional persons (per person) 1.25 1.30 Y Per Day
Gymnasium Membership
Adult 35.00 37.00 Y Per Year
Aged Pensioner 15.00 16.00 Y Per Year
Student (12 to 17) 20.00 21.00 Y Per Year
Family 60.00 63.00 Y Per Year
Library
Online Public Access
Internet/Email Access N/A N/A Y Per Five Minutes 35503741
Printing in Black and White N/A N/A Y Per A4 page 35503741
Library Card Replacement Fee 3.50 3.65 Y Per Replacement 35503705
Library Book Withdrawal Deposit
- Travellers 30.00 31.20 N Per Withdrawal 35503742
Library Book Damage/Replacement Fee
- As Per LISWA Catalogue At Cost At Cost Y Per Item 35503813
Library Bag 1.10 1.15 Y Per Bag
Inscription Post
Inscription Post Mail List 38.00 38.00 Y Per Annum 35903763
Inscription Post Advertising 35903740
Eighth Page Advertisement 15.75 16.40 Y Per Issue
Quarter Page Advertisement 26.25 27.30 Y Per Issue
Half Page Advertisement 40.00 41.60 Y Per Issue
Full Page Advertisement 65.00 67.60 Y Per Issue
Subsequent Full Page Advert 52.50 54.60 Y Per Issue
Graphics 13.65 14.20 Y Per Ad Per Issue
Casual loading 20% 20% Y Per Ad Per Issue
Discount of 1 month cost applies to
12 month advertising paid in
advance

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 96
Actual Budget General
Function Charge Charge Ledger
Program Particulars 2006/07 2007/08 GST Frequency A/c
$ $
World Heritage Discovery Centre
Entrance Fee Adult 10.00 10.00 Y Per Entry 36003722
Entrance Fee Children 6.00 6.00 Y Per Entry
Entrance Fee Concession Holder 8.00 8.00 Y Per Entry
Entrance Fee Group Bookings 8.00 8.00 Y Per Entry
Entrance Fee Educational Bookings 5.25 5.25 Y Per Entry
Entrance Fee Family (2 Adults & @
28.00 28.00 Y Per Entry
Children)
Entrance Fee Locals (Refer Council
Free Free
Policy for Eligibility
Books & Merchandise 36003770
- A Terrestrial Life (Booklet) 9.95 9.95 Y
- A Marine Life (Book) 9.95 9.95 Y
- Historical Landscapes (Book) 9.95 9.95 Y
- WHDC Placemats 9.95 9.95 Y
- Pro Hart computer mat 14.95 14.95 Y
- Pro Hart booklet 14.95 14.95 Y
- Pro Hart greeting cards 3.50 3.50 Y
- Pro Hart notepad 4.95 4.95 Y
- Pro Hart fridge magnet 4.00 4.00 Y
Visitor Centre Fees & Commission
- Corporate Membership N/a 500.00 Y Per Annum
- Accommodation Membership
36 Rooms N/a 396.00 Y Per Annum
1-36 Rooms N/a 290.00 Y Per Annum
Caravan Parks N/a 290.00 Y Per Annum
Back Packers N/a 290.00 Y Per Annum
- Tour Operator, Air Charter, Car/Bus N/a 290.00 Y Per Annum
Hire
- Real Estate N/a 290.00 Y Per Annum
- Holiday Homes (Per property) N/a 290.00 Y Per Annum
- General Business N/a 120.00 Y Per Annum
- Website Listing N/a 120.00 Y Per Annum
- Brochure Display N/a 80.00 Y Per Annum
- Individual & Non-profit organisations N/a 55.00 Y Per Annum
- Commission rates for members N/a 12% Y Per Booking
- Commission rates for non-members N/a 20% Y Per Booking
Discount for 2007/08 for Shark Bay N/A 50%
Tourist Association Members
Sale of Shark Bay History Books
- Retail Price (Soft Cover) 38.50 38.50 Y Per Book
- Wholesale Price (Soft Cover) 25.30 25.30 Y Per Book
- Retail Price (Hard Cover) 104.50 104.50 Y Per Book
- Wholesale Price (Hard Cover) 68.00 68.00 Y Per Book
Sale of Other Books
- Shark Bay Days 11.00 11.00 Y Per Book
- The Buccaneer's Bell 45.00 45.00 Y Per Book
- Patterns of Nature 55.00 55.00 Y Per Book
- Carpet of Silver The Wreck of the N/A 40.00 Y Per Book
Zuytdorp
- Voyage of Discovery to Terra
N/A 35.00 Y Per Book
Australia by Willem de
Vlamingh in 1696-97
Facility Hire
Functions/Meetings Community
Groups
- Over 3 hours 110.00 114.00 Y Per Function
- Less than or Equal to 3 hours 15.00 16.00 Y Per Hour
Functions/Meetings Private
- Over 3 hours 220.00 230.00 Y Per Function
- Less than or Equal to 3 hours 30.00 31.00 Y Per Hour
Cleaning Deposit 200.00 208.00 Y Per Function
Surcharge for Additional Cleaning At Cost At Cost Y Per Function
TRANSPORT
Streets, Roads, Bridges & Depots
Crossover – Shire rebate/contribution
- Bitumen construction 8.70 9.05 N Per Square Metre 45101940
- Paving Brick construction 30.45 31.70 N Per Square Metre 45101940
- Concrete construction 30.45 31.70 N Per Square Metre 45101940

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 97
Actual Budget General
Function Charge Charge Ledger
Program Particulars 2006/07 2007/08 GST Frequency A/c
$ $
Monkey Mia Jetty
Annual Jetty Fee
- Commercial tourism boat operators 85.00 88.50 Y Per Metre of 45403708
Vessel Length
- Commercial fishing boats 27.00 28.10 Y Per Metre of
Vessel Length
- Monthly Payment of Annual Fee 15% 15% Y Percentage of
Annual Fee
- E Class Commercial Operation
License for Wildlife Interaction Tours
within the Red Cliff Bay Marine
Mammal Interaction restricted area
zone -
1.10 1.10 Y Per Passenger
Head
- T Class Commercial Operation
License for Wildlife Interaction Tours
1.10 1.10 Y Per Passenger
Head
TRANSPORT
Denham Marina
Slipway Charges
Vessels 45503745
- Under 12 metres in length 85.00 88.50 Y Per Day or part
thereof
- Over 12 metres in length 85.00 88.50 Y Per Day or part
thereof
Haulage Charges
- Haulage only onto slipway/
ramp for exclusive purpose
of Transport Marine Safety
Survey (Limited Period)
165.00
235.00
172.00
245.00
Y Per Vessel
weekdays
Per Vessel
Weekends/public
holidays
165.00 172.00 Y Per Vessel
- Haulage all other Vessels
(includes haul up and down)
- Jinker Modifications N/A Cost + 30% Y Per Vessel
Power
6.50 6.80 Y
Water
4.00
4.20
At Cost with a
Minimum Daily
Fee of
Per Day or part
thereof
45503747
45503747
Electric Power Charges
6.50 6.80 Per Day or part 45503747
(Three Phase at Jetty)
thereof
- (Includes Vessels and Freezer
Trucks)
6.50 6.80 Per Day or part
thereof
Pen and Berthing Fees 45503753
Annual Pen Fee (Includes Service
Jetty Fee)
116.00 121.00 Y Per Metre of
Vessel Length
- Monthly Payment of Annual
Fee
15% 15% Y Percentage of
Annual Fee
- Monthly Pen Fee 25% 25% Y Percentage of
Annual Fee
Annual Fee for use of Service Jetty 39.00 41.00 Y Per Metre of 45503753
for Loading and Unloading
Vessel Length
Daily Casual Berthing Fee (per day 4.50 5.00 Y Per Metre of 45503753
or part thereof)
Vessel Length
Daily Breakdown Jetty Fee (non
N/A 110.00 Y Per Vessel
Annual Fee users)
Service Jetty Hardstand 45503786
On Slipway in front of Winch House 25.50 26.50 Y Per Day or part
thereof
Between Toilet Block and Winch
House and East of Fuel
Storage Tank and West of
Service Jetty
Power Charge (Single Phase)
(Included in Annual/Casual
Berthage Fees)
12.50 13.00 Y Per Day or part
thereof
6.50 6.80 Y Per Day or part
thereof
Water Charge 4.00 4.20 Y At Cost with a
Minimum Daily
Fee of
45503747
45503747
Fuel Wharfage Charge 0.022 0.022 Y Per Litre 45503730

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 98
Actual Budget General
Function Charge Charge Ledger
Program Particulars 2006/07 2007/08 GST Frequency A/c
$ $
ECONOMIC SERVICES
Tourism and Area Promotion
Monkey Mia Caravan Park - as per
Y Per Annum 50203903
Lease
Caravan Parks - as per Act and
Regulations
Caravan Park Registration 6.00 6.00 N Per Site Per 50203855
Financial Year
Overflow sites 1.50 1.50 N Per Site Per
Financial Year
Minimum 200.00 200.00 N Per Financial Yr
Licence Transfer Fee 100.00 100.00 N Per Application
Lodging House Licence - as per Local 70.00 70.00 N Per Annum 50203863
Laws (under 15)
Lodging House Licence - as per Local 140.00 140.00 N Per Annum 50203863
Laws (over 15)
Bed and Breakfast Accommodation 50203863
Registration 150.00 150.00 N Per Application
Annual Renewal 100.00 100.00 N Per Annum
Lease Reserve 30716 110.00 110.00 Y Per Annum 50203923
Building Services
Records
Search Fees/Property Enquiries 12.00 12.00 Y Per Property 50303703
Confirmation of Approved Plans - 30.00 30.00 Y Per Hour
Onsite
Building Plans (supply requires
owners written approval)
A1 size plans N/A N/A Y Per Sheet
A2 size plans N/A N/A Y Per Sheet
A3 size plans 1.20 1.20 Y Per Sheet
Maps - DOLI (Map cost plus 50
Y 50303703
cents)
Surveys (Private Works)
Bench Mark/TBM/Plan, Level
44.00 44.00 Y Per Hour Per 50303703
Checks or similar
Person
(Minimum Fee with Charge Out
66.00 66.00 Y Minimum
Rate $44/hour)
Building Returns Monthly Copies
Non Statutory Authorities (includes 33.00 33.00 Y Per Annum 50303703
postage and copying)
Building Permit Application Fees - as
50303853
per Building Regulations
Class 1 & 10 (Dwellings &
0.35% 0.35% N Minimum $40
Outbuildings)
x 10/11 x 10/11
Class 2 - 9 (All other) 0.20% 0.20% N Minimum $40
x10/11 x10/11
Minimum for above 40.00 40.00 N
Materials on Street 1.00 1.00 N Per Square Metre
Per Month
Demolition License Application Fee 50.00 50.00 N Per Storey 50303853
Kerb damage deposit
Single Unit Dwelling 200.00 200.00 N Trust 73206655
Multi Unit 100.00 100.00 N Per Unit
Commercial/Industrial 200.00 200.00 N
Government Department 0.00 0.00 N
Street Trading License 50.00 20.00 Y Per Day 50303890
Performance Bond to enable the Issue
of a Certificate of Completion
(Trust A/c)
300.00 300.00 N Per Building
License
Application
Swimming Pool Application Fee –
13.75 13.75 Y Per Year for 50303793
Public\Private Facilities
4 Yrly Inspection
BCITF Levy
Act Fee 0.2% 0.2% N Trust 73206651
Commission 4.40 4.40 Y Per Application 50304410
Signs
Policy Assessable Signs 120.00 120.00 N Per Sign
Impact Assessable Signs 120.00 120.00 N Per Sign

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 99
Actual Budget General
Function Charge Charge Ledger
Program Particulars 2006/07 2007/08 GST Frequency A/c
$ $
Footpath Signs 120.00
Application
fee &
$50.00 pa
per sign
Mobile Signs 120.00
Application
fee &
$50.00 pa
per sign
120.00
Application
fee & $50.00
pa per sign
120.00
Application
fee & $50.00
pa per sign
N
N
Per Sign
Per Sign
Strata Title Certificate Processing 50303788
Developed Land 50.00 50.00 N Per Lot
Subdivisions 50.00 50.00 N Per Lot
Minimum Fee 100.00 100.00 N Minimum
Building Site Toilet Hire
- Charge 12.60 12.60 Y Per Day 50303704
- Pick up fee 63.00 63.00 Y Per Pick Up
- Per Delivery 63.00 63.00 Y Per Drop Off
Other Economic Services
Shell Royalties
Export Contractor - as per Deed 6.93 7.22 Y Per Cubic Metre 50403985
Local Contractors 1.35 1.40 Y Per Cubic Metre
Brickies Sand Sales 6.00 6.25 Y Per Cubic Metre 50403902
Private Works
Plant Hire (All with Operator during Shire
Operating Hours only)
John Deere 670D Grader 148.80 153.90 Y Per Hour
Volvo L70E Front End Loader 142.50 148.20 Y Per Hour
Caterpillar IT14G Integrated Tool 119.50 124.30 Y Per Hour
Carrier
Vibrating Roller - Metal 129.60 134.80 Y Per Hour
Multi Tyred Roller - Rubber 129.60 134.80 Y Per Hour
Freightliner FL112 Prime Mover 124.60 134.80 Y Per Hour
plus Accessories
- 20 cubic metre Side Tipper 28.90 30.00 Y Per Hour
- 32,000 litre Water Tanker 37.00 38.50 Y Per Hour
- Float Trailer 84.00 87.40 Y Per Hour
- Dolly 65.50 68.10 Y Per Hour
Mitsubishi Fighter 102.65 106.75 Y Per Hour
Mitsubishi Canter 86.60 90.05 Y Per Hour
Mitsubishi Crew Cab 107.80 112.10 Y Per Hour
Case IHJX95 Tractor
116.20 120.85 Y Per Hour
plus Accessories
- Auger 10.10 10.50 Y Per Hour
- Alroh Slasher - Small 10.10 10.50 Y Per Hour
- Superior Slasher - Large 42.00 43.70 Y Per Hour
- Road Broom 42.00 43.70 Y Per Hour
Hire of Mobile Camp N/A 110.00 Y Per Day
Scheme Amendments 30303781
Total fee to be calculated in accordance
with the Town Planning Scheme
Amendments – Fee Calculation Table.
Final fee may be higher than the initial
upfront fee in which case an additional
charge will be involved (including GST).
Costs of staff time will be determined
according to the Schedule of Charge
Out Rates for Officer (see below).
1,500.00 1,500.00 Y
Subdivision Related Fees
Supervision Fee - % of total value of all
road and drainage works other than
future lots.
Consulting Engineer and Clerk of Works
fully supervises.
Consulting Engineer with no Clerk of
Works
Early Subdivision Clearance
1.5 % plus
GST
3.0% plus
GST
1.5 % plus
GST
3.0% plus
GST
Y 30303716
Y 30303716

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 100
Actual Budget General
Function Charge Charge Ledger
Program Particulars 2006/07 2007/08 GST Frequency A/c
$ $
Application Fee 550.00 550.00 Y 30303716
Early Subdivision Clearance Fee 1.0% plus 1.0% plus Y 30303716
GST GST
Or Minimum 2,000.00 2,000.00 plus Y 30303716
Early Clearance Default Fee
plus GST
20% value
work not
completed
plus GST
GST
20% value
work not
completed
plus GST
Subdivision Works – Maintenance
Bonds
% of total value of all works – held for 12
months from practical completion and
until all items are satisfactorily
completed.
$0 - $100,000 5.0% 5.0% Y
$100,000 - $200,000 4.0% 4.0% Y
$200,000 - $400,000 3.5% 3.5% Y
$400,000 - $600,000 3.0% 3.0% Y
Over $600,000 2.5% 2.5% Y
Reinstatement/Private Works
Road Reserves charge for reinstatement
of road reserves in the full cost plus
profit margin.
Private Works charge for reinstatement
of road reserves is the full cost profit
margin.
Outstanding Works Bond determined by
the Chief Executive Officer
Other crossing Place Related Services
Cost plus
30% plus
GST
Cost plus
30% plus
GST
Value plus
20%
Cost plus
30% plus
GST
Cost plus
30% plus
GST
Value plus
20%
Saw cutting and removal of kerbing 155.00 161.20 N
Concrete apron for brick paved
52.00 54.10 N
crossovers
Spray seal pothole repairs per square
metre
N
Asphalt pothole repairs per square
metre
41.00
(minimum
charge
$100.00)
52.00
(minimum
charge
$100.00)
42.65
(minimum
charge
$100.00)
54.10
(minimum
charge
$100.00)
Fee Structure - Scheme Amendments*
Y 30303716
Y
Y
Y
N
Task
1 Preliminaries
Preliminary discussions and
application registration
2 Decision to initiate
(a) Information and site visit
(b) Applicant discussion
(c) (DCU) Development
Control Unit meeting
(d) Action DCU
recommendation
(e) Assessment report and
agenda preparation MINOR
MAJOR
3 Approval to advertise
(a) Action local government
recommendation
(b) Refer to WAPC for
approval
Director/ City/
Shire Planner
($130/hour
plus GST
$143/hour)
Manager/
Senior Planner
($99/hour
plus GST
$108.90/hour)
Estimated costs
Planning
Office
($77/hour
plus GST
$84.70/hour)
Other staff eg Secretary/
Environmental Administrative
Health Officer Clerk
($109/hour ($35/hour
plus GST plus GST
$119.90/hour) $38.50/hour)

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 101
Task
(c) Advertising, notifications,
referrals
(d) Deal with enquiries
(e) Assess submissions
(f) Liaise with external
agencies
(g) Applicant discussion and
liaison
4 Decision to adopt
(a) Finalise amendment/plan,
report and agenda
preparation
(b) Applicant discussion
(c) Action local government
recommendation
5 Amendment/ plan approved
(a) Report on Minister’s
approval
(b) Notify submissions
(c) Update text and maps
HOURS
COST
+33.3% (To recover operating
overhead costs)
Total salary costs
+ Direct costs
+ Special costs
+ Scheme map and text
preparation
TOTAL PAYABLE
Director/ City/
Shire Planner
($130/hour
plus GST
$143/hour)
Manager/
Senior Planner
($99/hour
plus GST
$108.90/hour)
Estimated costs
Planning
Office
($77/hour
plus GST
$84.70/hour)
Other staff eg Secretary/
Environmental Administrative
Health Officer Clerk
($109/hour ($35/hour
plus GST plus GST
$119.90/hour) $38.50/hour)
• Where readvertising of substantial modifications is required, the fee is to be calculated in accordance with
items 3,4 and 5 of the Table for the staff time used in arranging the readvertising and reviewing the
submissions and the direct costs incurred in readvertising the amendment.
Fee Structure - Structure Plans **
Task
1 Preliminaries
Preliminary discussions and
registration
2 Decision to advertise
(a) Information and site visit
(b) Proponent discussion
(c) (DCU) Development
Control Unit meeting
(d) Action DCU
recommendation
(e) Assessment report and
agenda preparation
3 Approval to advertise
(a) Action local government
recommendation
(b) Advertising, notifications,
referrals l
(c) Assess submissions
Director/ City/
Shire Planner
($130/hour
plus GST
$143/hour)
Manager/
Senior Planner
($99/hour
plus GST
$108.90/hour)
Estimated costs
Planning
Office
($77/hour
plus GST
$84.70/hour)
Other staff eg Secretary/
Environmental Administrative
Health Officer Clerk
($109/hour ($35/hour
plus GST plus GST
$119.90/hour) $38.50/hour)

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 102
Task
(d) Deal with enquiries
(e) Liaise with external
agencies
(f) Proponent discussion and
liaison
4 Decision to adopt
(a) Finalise report and agenda
preparation
(b) Proponent discussion
(c) Action local government
recommendation
(d) Refer to WA Planning
Commission for approval
5 Plan Adopted
(a) Report on Commission
approval
(b) Notify proponent/others
(c) Update text and maps
HOURS
COST
+33.3% (To recover operating
overhead costs)
+ Direct costs
+ Special costs
TOTAL PAYABLE
Director/ City/
Shire Planner
($130/hour
plus GST
$143/hour)
Manager/
Senior Planner
($99/hour
plus GST
$108.90/hour)
Estimated costs
Planning
Office
($77/hour
plus GST
$84.70/hour)
Other staff eg Secretary/
Environmental Administrative
Health Officer Clerk
($109/hour ($35/hour
plus GST plus GST
$119.90/hour) $38.50/hour)
** This Table is based on the Western Australian Planning Commission’s draft model text provisions for structure
plans. Where the structure plan provisions in a town planning scheme of a local government are not
consistent with the draft model text provisions, the fees should be calculated by that local government in
accordance with the structure plan provisions of the scheme.
Where readvertising of a proposed structure plan is required, the fee is to be calculated in accordance with
items 3,4 and 5 of the Table for the staff time used in arranging the readvertising and reviewing the
submissions and the direct costs incurred in readvertising the structure plan.
Voting Requirements
Absolute Majority Required.
Date of Report 22 May 2007
Moved Cr Hoult
Seconded Cr Blennerhassett
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
19.0 MOTIONS OF WHICH PREVIOUS NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN
Nil.
20.0 QUESTIONS BY MEMBERS OF WHICH DUE NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVEN
Nil.
21.0 INFORMAL DISCUSSION
21.1 GUNSON RESOURCES LTD - HEAVY TRAFFIC

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 103
21.2 DRAFT PLAN FOR THE FUTURE
21.3 STELLA ROWLEY DRIVE SUBDIVISION STREET NAMES
21.4 DAMPIER TO BUNBURY NATURAL GAS PIPELINE COMMITTEE
22.0 URGENT BUSINESS APPROVED BY THE PERSON PRESIDING OR BY DECISION
Nil.
23.0 MATTERS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS
Moved Cr Hoult
Seconded Cr Cane
That the meeting be closed to members of the public for Council to discuss matters of a
commercial and confidential nature.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
The meeting was closed to members of the public at 11.17 am.
23.1 SHARK BAY WORLD HERITAGE DISCOVERY CENTRE HISTORICAL ARTEFACTS HI 102 BU 106.03
Author
Chief Executive Officer
Disclosure of Any Interest
Nil.
Background
Council will be aware of recent events in regard to the WA Museum requesting nine (9)
historical artefact items from the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre be returned to
it. The items in questions as stated by the WA Museum are -
Item Registration No Description
Zuytdorp 1 ZT2403R Sternpiece (replica)
Zuytdorp 2 ZT2409 Bronze swivel gun
Zuytdorp 8 ZT980 Cannon ball callipers
Shark Bay 1 CH1003 de Vlamingh post
Shark Bay 2 CH1004 Hamelin post
Shark Bay 3 DHE170A French bottle glass
Shark Bay 4 DHE170B Lead capsule with iron wire
Shark Bay 5 DHE170C Silver ecu dated 1767
Shark Bay 41 GU 16 Gudrun Figurehead
The Chief Executive Officer has been corresponding with the Chief Executive Officer of the
WA Museum for some time in regard to the WA Museum’s request to have the original
artefacts returned to the WA Museum. Council's position has always been to request
replicas of the artefacts be made so as to not have empty purpose built showcases where
the original artefacts are housed.
The other issue in regard to the original items that the WA Museum has raised is that these
items are subject to the conditions of the Short Term Loan Agreement. Again the Chief
Executive Officer has corresponded with the Chief Executive Officer of the WA Museum
outlining the issues that the Shire of Shark Bay has with the Short Term Loan Agreement
applicable to these artefacts.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 104
On Friday 4 May 2007 three WA Museum staff members attended the Shark Bay World
Heritage Discovery Centre to retrieve the original artefacts. On instruction from the Chief
Executive Officer to the Centre staff, the WA Museum staff were denied access to the
artefacts, a fact that was been communicated to by the Chief Executive Officer not only to
the WA Museum Chief Executive Officer but also to one of the WA Museum staff who
attended the Centre on several occasions. This is despite the assertion by the WA Museum
Chief Executive Officer to the contrary.
On Monday 7 May 2007 the Shire President, Deputy President, Cr Cane, Cr Hoult and the
Chief Executive Officer attended a workshop forum convened by the Hon Vince Catania
MLC and Chaired by the Hon Sally Talbot MLC, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of
the Environment, to discuss the ongoing viability of the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery
Centre. Prior to this workshop forum the Hon Vince Catania met with the Shire President,
Deputy President, Cr Cane, Cr Blennerhassett, Cr Hoult and the Chief Executive Officer to
discuss the issue regarding the artefacts. It was agreed that the Hon Vince Catania
negotiate on behalf of Council with the Minister for the Arts, the Hon Sheila McHale MLA, to
allow the artefacts to be released to the WA Museum for its impending French and Dutch
Travelling Exhibition.
Council agreed that should the Minister and the WA Museum provide written assurance that
the artefacts in question be guaranteed for return to the Shark Bay World Heritage
Discovery Centre upon completion of the Exhibition the WA Museum require them for, and
that appropriate replicas be made, Council would release the artefacts to the WA Museum
staff who were in Shark Bay for the purpose of collecting the artefacts. The Hon Vince
Catania relayed this position to the Minister’s office and requested the Chief Executive
Officer advise him when the Minister’s office faxed its reply. The correspondence from the
Minister’s Office was faxed at 14.41 hours as follows -
Further to your meeting with Hon Vince Catania MLC regarding the 9 items on short term loan to
the Shark Bay Interpretive Centre, I would like to confirm that when not in conservation treatment
or required to be featured in Western Australian Museum exhibitions these items can be available for
exhibition at the Shark Bay Interpretive Centre under conditions to be agreed at that time in the
future.
It was evident to the Shire President and the Chief Executive Officer that this
correspondence did not reflect the intention of the negotiations and certainly did not provide
any written guarantee or assurance that Council had earlier requested.
The Chief Executive Officer and the Shire President also met with the three WA Museum
staff members at the Centre who were awaiting any outcome from the negotiations shortly
afterwards to discuss the matter. The Shire President again reiterated that should Council
receive written assurance that the artefacts in question be guaranteed for return to the
Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre upon completion of the Exhibition the WA
Museum require them for, and that appropriate replicas be made, Council would release the
artefacts to the WA Museum staff that were in Shark Bay for the purpose of collecting the
artefacts. Unfortunately during these discussions the Chief Executive Officer became
aware of faxed correspondence to Council from the State Solicitors Office in regard to the
matter as follows -
SHARK BAY WORLD HERITAGE DISCOVERY CENTRE OBJECTS
I am writing to you on behalf of the Western Australian Museum with regard to the nine items on
loan to the Shire of Shark Bay (the Shire) (set out in the schedule to this letter) (the Items).
The Items are the subject of loan agreements between the Museum and the Shire (the Loan
Agreements) which were executed by Ms Julie Bryce, A/Chief Executive Officer on behalf of the
Shire in November 2005.
The Loan Agreements for the Items ended on 30 June 2006, at which [point they were extended on
the same terms and conditions until 30 September 2006 for the Items in question.
The Loan Agreements have now terminated and the Museum has sought to recover the Items from
your possession, which has been refused.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 105
I have had the opportunity review your correspondence to -
(i) Dr Dawn Casey, Chief Executive Officer, WA Museum, of 22 December 2006 and 27 April
2007;
(ii) the Premier of 29 August 2006; and
(iii) the Minister for Heritage, of 29 August 2006.
The Items are the subject of legally binding Loan Agreements, which you acknowledge in your letter
to the Premier of 29 August 2006. Pursuant to the Loan Agreements, at their conclusion, the Items
are to be returned to the Museum.
In attempting to enforce the Loan Agreements, officers from the Museum have been denied access to
the Items. I cannot see any legal basis for that action by the Shire, nor can I see any basis upon
which the Shire can deny being bound by the Loan Agreements or argue that the Items are its
property. If you have any submissions on the legality of the Shire's actions, I would be happy to
receive those.
Otherwise, on behalf of the Museum, I request that you immediately provide access to the Items, and
indeed the Items themselves, to the officers of the Museum.
Please respond to this correspondence, and our request, no later that 12:00 pm Tuesday 8 May
2007.
Schedule
Item on Loan Reg. No. Description
Agreement
Zuytdorp 1 ZT2403R Sternpiece (replica)
Zuytdorp 2 ZT2409 Bronze swivel gun
Zuytdorp 8 ZT980 Cannon ball callipers
Shark Bay 1 CH1003 De Vlamingh Post
Shark Bay 2 CH1004 Hamlin Post
Shark Bay 3 DHE170A French bottle, glass
Shark Bay 4 DHE170B Lead capsule with iron wire
Shark Bay 5 DHE170C Silver ecu dated 1767
Shark Bay 41 GU16 Figurehead, female, from wreck of "Gudrun"
Given the written advice from the State Solicitors Office presumably under the instruction of
the Chief Executive Officer of the WA Museum, it became apparent to both the Chief
Executive Officer and the Shire President that the WA Museum and the Minister's Office
were not negotiating in good faith. Accordingly the Shire President advised the three WA
Museum staff members that due to this latest correspondence arriving Council's position
remained unchanged.
The Chief Executive Officer advised the Hon Vince Catania next day of what had occurred
and prepared a draft letter on his request to the Minister’s Office again outlining that despite
what had occurred, Council was still prepared to negotiate. A copy of this draft
correspondence was sent on 8 May 2007 as follows -
SHARK BAY WORLD HERITAGE DISCOVERY CENTRE ITEMS
Further to recent discussions held between the Hon Vince Catania MLC on behalf of the
Shire of Shark Bay and yourself in regard to the above matter I advise that Council is
prepared to release the items in question under the following conditions -
1 That the items be returned to the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre when
not required by the WA Museum for the purpose of specific (travelling or otherwise)
exhibitions and/or for any conservation work that may be required from time to time as
deemed by the WA Museum and that when the items are required by the WA
Museum that a specific time period be provided by the WA Museum to the Shire of
Shark Bay regarding the proposed absence of the items from the Shark Bay World
Heritage Discovery Centre on each and every occasion. That this be a specific
condition of a Long Term Renewable Loan Agreement as reflected in Point Two
below.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 106
2 That the items in question (as listed) be loaned to the Shire of Shark Bay on a Long
Term Renewable Loan Agreement with the general conditions being exactly the same
as the other fifty nine (59) items in the Centre and,
3 That replicas of the items in question be made by the WA Museum to be used by the
Shire of Shark Bay in place of the original items when required by the WA Museum
and/or that replacement items relevant to the Shark Bay area be provided.
Providing Council receives the above undertaking in writing the Shire of Shark Bay is quite
prepared to release the items to the WA Museum and as a further goodwill gesture will
provide the appropriate packing crates owned by the Shire of Shark Bay for the purpose of
transporting the said items.
The items in question as listed on separate attachment do not include the Gudrun
Figurehead as this matter has been previously resolved between the Shire of Shark Bay
and the WA Museum following the return of the Gudrun replica to the WA Museum in late
2006. This has been acknowledged in previous correspondence by the WA Museum to the
Shire of Shark Bay.
Your acknowledgement of the above is requested at your earliest convenience.
SCHEDULE OF LOAN ITEMS
Item Registration # Description
Zuytdorp 1 ZT2403R Sternpiece (replica)
Zuytdorp 2 ZT2409 Bronze swivel gun
Zuytdorp 8 ZT980 Cannon ball callipers
Shark Bay 1 CH1003 de Vlamingh post
Shark Bay 2 CH1004 Hamelin post
Shark Bay 3 DHE170A French bottle glass
Shark Bay 4 DHE170B Lead capsule with iron wire
Shark Bay 5 DHE170C Silver ecu dated 1767
Total of eight (8) items
The Minister’s Office rejected this offer and to further compound the matter the Chief
Executive Officer of the WA Museum phoned Cr Cane advising him that the artefacts in
question would not be returned to Shark Bay once the WA Museum had possession and
that we would not be getting items from any other Australian Museums. The WA Museum
Chief Executive Officer also advised Cr Cane that she would be phoning every other Shire
of Shark Bay Councillor. To date Cr Cane is the only Councillor to have been telephoned.
Cr Cane has provided a written transcript of the telephone discussion to the Chief Executive
Officer.
The Chief Executive Officer met with Council's solicitors (McLeods Barristers and Solicitors)
on Monday 14 May 2007 to provide copies of up to date documentation and to discuss the
matter. Council's solicitors have advised the State Solicitors Office that they (McLeods) act
on behalf of the Shire of Shark Bay in regard to this matter.
Comment
At present the situation, based on advice from Council's solicitors, is that the Minister's
Office is now prepared to accept correspondence from Council similar to that previously
sent in draft form. That is, the draft correspondence as printed above outlining Council's
position sent to the Minister's Office on 8 May 2007 whereby the Minister rejected Council's
offer.
Since this (draft) correspondence was sent on 8 May 2007 Council’s Chief Executive
Officer, the Shire President and other Councillors have become aware of the comments that
the Chief Executive Officer of the WA Museum has made to Cr Cane as well as the media
statements made by the Chief Executive Officer of the WA Museum, especially to the local
media.
In response to the Minister’s request through the State Solicitors Office to have Council's
position put forward in formal correspondence, and taking into consideration the recent

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 107
comments and action by the Chief Executive Officer of the WA Museum, the following
correspondence was faxed to the Minister’s office on Friday 25 May 2007 -
SHARK BAY WORLD HERITAGE DISCOVERY CENTRE ITEMS
I refer to discussions held between the Hon Vince Catania MLC on behalf of the Shire of
Shark Bay and yourself, as well as more recent discussions between the State Solicitors
Office and McLeods Barristers and Solicitors who act on behalf of the Shire of Shark Bay in
the above matter.
In particular the most recent advice that the State Solicitors Office has provided to Council’s
solicitors is that it is now accepted by the WA Museum that the Gudrun figurehead should
not be on the short term loan agreement list and accordingly is not one of the items
requested by the WA Museum. Council requests this confirmation in writing at your earliest
convenience.
This recent advice from the State Solicitors Office also advised that the cost of making the
replicas is a problem for the Museum and accordingly if the Shire of Shark Bay was to put
forward a proposition involving the sharing of costs in making the replicas with the Museum
the proposal would be more palatable to the Trustees of the WA Museum. In this regard it
should be noted that the Gudrun Figurehead replica, which is now at the WA Maritime
Museum, was paid in full by Council at a cost of approximately $6,500.00. Notwithstanding
this, Council would be prepared to share the (reasonable) cost of making some of the other
replicas where necessary and/or applicable.
In this regard the short term loan list of items (excluding the Gudrun figurehead) refers to the
Zuytdorp items such as the Sternpiece (ZT2403R), which is already a replica and therefore
Council's view is that the WA Museum should obtain the original Sternpiece that Council
understands is already on loan to the Geraldton Museum. This would alleviate the need to
reproduce another replica of this item. A replica of the Zuytdorp bronze swivel cannon gun
(Item ZT2409) can be provided to the WA Museum at Council's cost as can the Zuytdorp
cannon ball callipers (Item ZT980).
The only other items therefore remaining on the Schedule List are the de Vlamingh Post
(CH1003), the Hamelin Post (CH1004), the French Glass Bottle (DHE170A), the lead
capsule with iron wire (DHE170B) and the silver ecu dated 1767 (DHE 170C). With regard
to these items Council requests that the artefacts be replaced with other valuable and
authentic items relevant to the Shark Bay area that the WA Museum has in its possession
so as to ensure that the purpose built glass display cabinets that these artefacts are housed
in do not remain empty. In the longer term replicas of these particular artefacts can be
made on a cost sharing basis with Council. This suggestion was in fact made by the WA
Museum staff to the Shire President when they attended the Centre in early May 2007.
Given the above, I advise that Council is prepared to release the items in questions under
the following conditions -
1 That the items be returned to the Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre when
not required by the WA Museum for the purpose of specific (travelling or otherwise)
exhibitions and/or for any conservation work that may be required from time to time as
deemed by the WA Museum and that when the items are required by the WA Museum
that a specific time period be provided by the WA Museum to the Shire of Shark Bay
regarding the proposed absence of the items from the Shark Bay World Heritage
Discovery Centre on each and every occasion. That this be a specific condition of a
Long Term Renewable Loan Agreement as reflected in Point Two below.
2 That the items in question (as listed) be loaned to the Shire of Shark Bay on a Long
Term Renewable Loan Agreement with the general conditions being exactly the same
as the other fifty nine (59) items in the Centre and,
3 That replicas of the items in question be made by the WA Museum on a cost sharing
basis with the Shire of Shark Bay to be used by Council in the Centre in place of the
original items when required by the WA Museum and that these artefacts be replaced
with other valuable and authentic items relevant to the Shark Bay area that the WA
Museum has in its possession until the replicas are made so as to ensure that the
purpose built glass display cabinets that these artefacts are housed in do not remain
empty.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 108
Providing Council receives the above undertaking in writing the Shire of Shark Bay is quite
prepared to release the items to the WA Museum and as a further goodwill gesture will
provide the appropriate packing crates owned by the Shire of Shark Bay for the purpose of
transporting the said items.
Conditional on the above is that you come, as Minister for Culture and the Arts, to Shark
Bay to visit and inspect the wonderful and unique displays in the Shark Bay World Heritage
Discovery Centre. The Councillors and community of the Shire of Shark Bay feel sure that
you will gain a thorough appreciation of Council's position once you have visited the Centre.
Your acknowledgement of the above is requested at your earliest convenience.
SCHEDULE OF LOAN ITEMS
Item Registration # Description
Zuytdorp 1 ZT2403R Sternpiece (replica)
Zuytdorp 2 ZT2409 Bronze swivel gun
Zuytdorp 8 ZT980 Cannon ball callipers
Shark Bay 1 CH1003 de Vlamingh post
Shark Bay 2 CH1004 Hamelin post
Shark Bay 3 DHE170A French bottle glass
Shark Bay 4 DHE170B Lead capsule with iron wire
Shark Bay 5 DHE170C Silver ecu dated 1767
Total of eight (8) items
Council will await the response by the Minister’s Office and/or the State Solicitors Office in
regard to the contents of the correspondence reflecting Council's current position. The
Chief Executive Officer has requested that should any legal action be forthcoming from the
State Solicitors Office in regard to the matter that it be directed through Council's solicitors.
Legal Implications
As detailed above.
Policy Implications
Nil.
Financial Implications
Legal fees associated with any ongoing litigation and Council's insurance for legal fees.
Strategic Implications
Long term viability of the Centre with the original artefacts removed.
Recommendation
That Council endorse the recent actions by the Chief Executive Officer and the
contents of the correspondence dated 25 May 2007 to the Minister for Culture and the
Arts which reflects the Shire of Shark Bay’s position in regards to the artefacts in the
Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre.
Voting Requirements
Simple Majority Required.
Date of Report 28 May 2007
23.2 WOODLEIGH BYRO ROAD RO 105
23.3 MONKEY MIA JETTY MA 100
The Chief Executive Officer left the Chambers at 11.58 pm and reentered the Chambers at 12.03 pm.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 109
The Works Supervisor reentered the Chambers at 12.19 pm.
Moved Cr Crawford
Seconded Cr Cane
That the meeting be reopened to members of the public.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
The meeting was reopened to members of the public at 12.49 pm.
The meeting adjourned at 12.49 pm and reconvened at 1.18 pm with all those previously in
attendance present.
Moved Cr Cane
Seconded Cr Blennerhassett
That the meeting be closed to members of the public for Council to continue to discuss
matters of a commercial and confidential nature.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
The meeting was closed to members of the public at 1.18 pm.
The Works Supervisor left the Chambers at 2.30 pm.
Moved Cr Cane
Seconded Cr Blennerhassett
That the meeting be reopened to members of the public.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
The meeting was reopened to members of the public at 2.39 pm.
23.1 SHARK BAY WORLD HERITAGE DISCOVERY CENTRE HISTORICAL ARTEFACTS HI 102 BU 106.03
Moved Cr Cane
Seconded Cr Hoult
That the recommendation be adopted.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
23.2 WOODLEIGH BYRO ROAD RO 105
Moved Cr Crawford
Seconded Cr Blennerhassett
That Council allow the 20 heavy haulage trucks requiring access to the Dampier to
Bunbury Natural Gas Pipeline through 5 June to 31 July 2007 to access the pipeline
from the western end of Woodleigh Byro Road but only under written permit from the
Shire of Shark Bay and that these trucks be escorted by an accredited escort in and
out.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
Moved Cr Crawford
Seconded Cr Cane
That Council delegate authority to the President, Deputy President and available
Councillors to view the proposed contract from DBP (Dampier to Bunbury Natural
Gas Pipeline) regarding road reinstatement and make a decision on acceptance or
otherwise.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 110
23.3 MONKEY MIA JETTY MA 100
Moved Cr Blennerhassett
Seconded Cr Hoult
That Council -
1 Reiterate its resolution 23.1 of 26 July 2006 and 23.1 of 28 March 2007 on the
charging of $1.10 (including GST) for usage of the Monkey Mia jetty for holders
of E Class and T Class Commercial Operation Licences for Wildlife Interaction
Tours issued by the Department of Environment and Conservation.
2 As the holders of the E Class and T Class Commercial Operation Licences for
Wildlife Interaction Tours issued by the Department of Environment and
Conservation mentioned in Clause 1 have not disclosed their passenger
numbers, assume a mean average, as previously advised to the Licensees, and
invoice both operators.
3 After 14 days if the accounts remain outstanding will deny access to the
Monkey Mia jetty to the operators.
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
24.0 DATE AND TIME OF NEXT MEETING
24.1 Wednesday 27 June 2007 at 9.00 am.
25.0 CLOSURE OF MEETING
The Deputy President declared the meeting closed at 2.45 pm.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 111
26.0 INFORMATION BULLETIN
26.1 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT - MAY 2007
Author
Chief Executive Officer
26.1.1 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER MEETINGS
The Chief Executive Officer attended meetings and events in April/May 2007 with the
following groups/individuals -
• Ordinary Council meeting 2 May 2007
• Chief Executive Officer met with Vince Catania MLC regarding Shark Bay issues
• Chief Executive Officer, Cr Eddington and Works Supervisor met with Alinta Gas and
Saipan delegates in Carnarvon along with Shire’s of Carnarvon and Upper Gascoyne
to discuss condition of Woodleigh Byro Road
• Mrs Eileen Grantham regarding Daylight Saving petition
• Council extraordinary election 21 April 2007
• ANZAC Day ceremony
• New District Superintendent Police at Shark Bay Police Station
• Paul Rush New Zealand journalist - familiarisation tour of the Shark Bay World
Heritage Discovery Centre
• Budget meeting
• Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Forum meeting Chaired by Sally Talbot
MLC, Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of Environment
• Financial Donations Assistance meeting with Finance and Administration Manager
and Cr Robert Blennerhassett
• Staff performance review - Works Supervisor and Accountant
• McLeods Barristers & Solicitors to discuss Centre historical artefacts
• Peter Hill Tourism WA to discuss accreditation of the Centre and transfer of Bookeasy
system
• Sally Talbot MLC and Tim Bowra at Parliament House to discuss outcome of Forum
meeting and progress to next stage
• Market Creations in Geraldton to discuss website development, World Heritage Drive
and merchandise booklets for Centre
• WA Herbarium and Pritchard Binders regarding Dampier replica plant collection
26.1.2 WESTERN AUSTRALIAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION HONOURS PROGRAM
Council will recall that at its last Ordinary meeting Councillors enquired as to wether or not
WALGA Association Award Honours were awarded posthumously.
The Chief Executive Officer clarified this query with Ms Meredith Neilsen, Corporate Support
Coordinator for the WALGA Association Honours Program, who advised that any award
category can be awarded posthumously. This year’s Association Honours had a
nomination to WALGA to award an honours category posthumously that was accepted.
Accordingly should Council agree then the Chief Executive Officer can write to Mrs Hipper
outlining Council's intention requesting her respond.
26.1.3 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER LEAVE OF ABSENCE
Council is advised that the Chief Executive Officer will be absent on leave from 5 June to 8
June 2007 as previously advised.
26.1.4 LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROPORTIONAL PREFERENTIAL VOTING SYSTEM PROPOSAL
The Western Australian Local Government Association has advised all Councils of
developments regarding the proposed introduction of the Proportional Preferential Voting
System for Local Government. The key issues regarding the matter are -

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 112
1 The Minister for Local Government has advised that the State Government will pursue
the introduction of the system despite WALGA's advocacy against it.
2 The WALGA State Council resolved to continue representations against the
introduction of the system, and
3 The WALGA State Council considered actions to be taken to defeat and/or delay the
passage of the legislation through Parliament.
More information is available from the Chief Executive Officer.
26.1.5 WILDLIFE INTERACTION LICENCE AMENDMENT
Council has received written advice from the Director General of the Department of
Environment and Conservation that it intends to amend the current licence conditions
applicable to the T Class wildlife interaction operator at Monkey Mia. This advice is that the
amendment will increase the current 4 kilometre exclusion zone to 6 kilometres for the T
Class licensed operator.
More information is available from the Chief Executive Officer.
Date of Report 17 May 2007
26.2 MANAGER REGULATORY SERVICES REPORT BU 102.02
Author
Manager Regulatory Services
26.2.1 PLANNING REPORT TO 105
1 Denham Residential Estate Progress Update
LandCorp advises -
As a key stakeholder in the region, we are pleased to advise you on the progress of this important
project which will provide for the positive future growth of Denham.
Construction of Stage 1 of LandCorp's new residential estate in Denham has progressed over the
summer months with site works now complete. The 46 lots forming this first stage are now receiving
the final touches in readiness for sale which is planned for July this year.
A further two stages will complete Phase 1 of the estate, creating a total of 126 lots on 16 ha of land
located directly adjacent to the Denham township. Subject to town planning approval, the estate
could ultimately consist of approximately 300 lots on 150 ha of land fronting Stella Rowley Drive
and Freycinet Street, providing for growth of Denham over the next 15 to 20 years.
To ensure the estate meets the future needs of Denham, LandCorp, the State Government's property
developer, has worked closely with the Denham Residential Steering Committee, the Yamatji Land
and Sea Council and the local Malgana people, the Shire of Shark Bay, Gascoyne Development
Commission and various Government Departments and Agencies.
The estate is being designed to complement the existing town and demonstrate sustainable design
features which will help protect and enhance the natural features of the area.
The layout of lots will take advantage of the natural contours of the land and are oriented to
maximise solar access and capture marine park and inland views, while ensuring the views from
Little Lagoon and the scenic tourist route are protected by natural land features.
Landscaping in the estate has been inspired by features of the natural environment, including the
birridas and patterns made by the sand crabs. Local native plants including coastal heath and mallee
are being used throughout the estate to retain the existing vegetation.
To receive the latest sales information and notification of the first land release, please contact the
selling agent, Rex Grass at Ray White Shark Bay on 9948 1323.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 113
Alternatively, for further information about the project contact LandCorp's northern information
line on 1300 730 479 or visit website www.landcorp.com.au and select 'Denham' using the project
finder.
2 Proposed Road Names Denham Stage One NO 101
LandCorp advises -
Attached are the proposed road names for Denham Stage 1.
I have spoken to Brian Goodchild at the Geographic Names Committee. We have agreed that until
we have clarified the origin of the additional 7 names provided by the Yamatji Land and Sea Council,
which may take several weeks, we should select from the original names approved and set aside by
Council (Mair, Adams, Johnson, Mallard and Oakley).
Jim, can you please confirm if the Council is satisfied with the proposed names? I assume the
Geographic Names Committee would want something on the Shire letterhead please. (Happy to
consider other options but at present the choice seems quite limited.)
Peter, once Jim has confirmed the names can you please prepare a new plan and send it to the
Geographic Names Committee?
26.2.2 BUILDING REPORT BU 102.02
Nil.
26.2.3 HEALTH ISSUES HE 101
Denham North and Denham South (D7-7) Water Reserves Draft Drinking Water Source
Protection Plan
The Department of Water advises -
Thank you for providing the Shire's submission dated 30 March 2007 regarding the above Plan.
Each of the points raised by the Shire are addressed separately below -
1 The Water Corporation has advised this Department that the buffer area for the Denham
North Water Reserve relates to the chlorine dosing plant at the site. It is a hazardous chemical
storage buffer for the purpose of assessing and advising land uses within a defined zone for
town planning purposes. It doesn't relate to the water source protection issues addressed by
the Draft Drinking Water Source Protection Plan. Further details of the Corporation's buffer
standards can be obtained by contacting the Corporation's Land Planning Manager on
9420 2769.
2 As stated in Section 1.4 Future water supply requirements, Water Corporation have notified
this Department that the 'current source is considered adequate to meet future demand' for
the town water supply. In regards to plans for the treatment plant to accommodate
fluoridation, the Water Corporation has advised that fluoridation of the Denham Town Water
Supply is dependant on the size of the town growing to the trigger level and the Department
of Health setting the requirement for fluoridation subsequent to pressure from the community,
which is usually sponsored by local dentists.
3 As detailed in the Draft Plan, the Denham North Water Reserve (DNWR) is limited to the
boundary of the Water Corporation property - Lot 39 Monkey Mia Road. The chemical
storage buffer area for the dosing plant is a defined area determined relative to the location and
size/type of the dosing plant (see point 1) and is the same as the DNWR boundary.
4 As outlined in Section 1.1 and 1.2, the existing water supply production bore 1/97 and all the
treatment/storage infrastructure for the Denham Town Water Supply is located within the
DNWR. This elevated reserve is also essential to provide reticulation pressure to meet the
Water Corporation's standards to satisfy their Customer Charter. There are no plans to
relocate this infrastructure. This land is proposed to be proclaimed as a water reserve to
protect groundwater sourced by bore 1/97 from contamination. The proposed reserve poses no
impact on private land as current land uses are still able to be conducted.
5 As outlined in Section 4.2 and in Recommendation 2, Denham D7-2 should be deproclaimed
under the provisions of the "Country Areas Water Supply Act 1947" as there is no longer a

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 114
production bore within this reserve and as such, groundwater protective measures are not
required. It is not anticipated that this will affect the Shire of Shark Bay's World Heritage
Discovery Centre Block but please contact the Water Corporation is regards to future use of
the land.
Should you require any further information regarding the above issues, please contact Kellie
Ketteringham on 6364 7540.
26.2.4 RANGER REPORT DO 101
Nil
Date of Report 22 May 2007
26.3 BUILDING APPLICATIONS PROCESSED ST 114
Nil.
26.4 SUMMARY OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS 2006/2007 ST 114
Nil.
26.5 WORKS SUPERVISOR’S REPORT
Works Supervisor's Report included in Works Committee agenda.
26.6 SHARK BAY WORLD HERITAGE DISCOVERY CENTRE MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
Author
Shark Bay World Heritage Discovery Centre Staff
26.6.1 BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND GENERAL CENTRE ISSUES
The month of April has been a busy one for the Centre. We had a group of Carnarvon
Artists exhibiting in the Rose de Freycinet Gallery. A very successful exhibition.
The Rose de Freycinet Gallery was used for a civic reception for the State Governor. All
attending had an enjoyable time.
Easter was a busy time with the town booked out with tourists and combined with school
holidays we had an increase in family entries to the Centre, as well as a general increase in
entries. We are providing a lot of information on the area to visitors to our Centre.
26.6.2 VISITOR NUMBERS
Weekly Centre Detail Report from 1 April to 30 April 2007
Description
1-7
April
8-14
April
15-21
April
22-28
April
29-30
April
Total
Local Entry 2 2 0 1 0 5
Adult Entry 88 169 132 111 24 524
Children Entry 20 34 34 9 2 99
Concession Entry 31 63 43 42 17 196
Family Entry 11 27 30 8 0 76
Tour Groups 1 1 0 0 0 0
Tour Group Persons 4 10 0 0 0 14
Rose de Freycinet Gallery
Entry 41 152 102 111 27 433
Grand Total 197 457 341 282 70 1,347

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 115
26.6.3 MONTHLY FINANCE/ WEEKLY BREAKDOWN
Weekly Centre Detail Report from 1 April to 30 April 2007
Local Entry
Description
1-7
April
8-14
April
15-21
April
22-28
April
29-30
April
Total
Adult Entry 799.92 1,536.21 1,199.88 1,008.99 218.16 4,763.16
Concession Entry 109.06 185.31 185.34 49.05 10.90 539.66
Children Entry 225.38 458.09 312.65 305.39 123.59 1,425.10
Family Entry 279.95 687.15 763.50 203.60 0.00 1,934.20
Tour Groups Entry 29.09 72.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 101.82
Rose de Freycinet Gallery
Entry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grand Total 1,443.40 2,939.49 2,461.37 1,567.03 352.65 8,763.94

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 116
26.6.4 MONTHLY FINANCE COMPARISON

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 117
26.6.5 OPERATING STATEMENT AS AT 30 APRIL 2007
Expenses
Current Budget YTD Budget YTD Actual
Account
Description
Full Year 30 April 2007 30 April 2007
36000610 Salaries and Wages 114,240 95,200 91,572
36000660 Staff Training 2,500 2,080 3,097
36000670 Superannuation - Employer 1,801 1,500 1,037
36000675 Superannuation - Occupational 10,282 8,570 8,645
36000680 Travel and Accommodation Staff 1,500 1,250 331
36000685 Insurance - Workers Compensation 3,473 3,473 3,488
36000715 Cleaning 29,473 24,560 19,939
36000730 Maintenance 10,000 8,340 9,393
36000775 Utilities 31,585 25,971 33,511
36000895 Advertising 40,000 33,330 15,297
36000905 Travelling Exhibition Costs 15,000 12,500 4,326
36000920 Computer Consumables 2,000 1,670 2,878
36000970 Postage 1,000 830 313
36000975 Printing and Stationery 3,000 2,500 1,446
36000977 Promo Material 40,000 33,330 11,548
36000995 Telephone 3,000 2,250 1,967
36001301 Depreciation - Plant and Equipment 8,593 7,160 7,157
36001302 Depreciation - Furniture and Equipment 29,498 24,580 24,566
36001303 Depreciation - Land and Building 203,455 169,550 268,343
36001470 Insurance 8,476 8,476 8,476
36002697 Purchase - Other Books for Resale - - 213
36001600 Governance Overheads Allocated 29,347 24,460 21,801
36002920 Web Site Development 5,000 4,170 1,141
593,223 495,750 540,474
Revenue
Current Budget YTD Budget YTD Actual
Account
Description
Full Year 30 April 2007 30 April 2007
36003423 Contributions and Donations Operating 2,500 2,500 -
36003650 Reimbursement - Other - - 409
36003722 Entrance Fees 312,000 260,000 72,740
36003771 Sale of Other Shark Bay Books - - 286
36003773 Sale - Shark Bay History Book - - 700
36003770 Sale - Merchandise - - 104
314,500 262,500 74,239
Expenses
Date of Report 14 May 2007
26.7 BUILDING HEALTHY COMMUNITIES PROJECT
Author
Building Healthy Communities Project Officers
26.7.1 BHC NATIONAL WORKSHOP REPORT
As part of the BHC project plan, a national and regional workshop is held every six months
with telephone conferences being held regularly to enable BHC projects to network and
provide training and support.
The National workshop was held in Adelaide on 30 April 2007 and 1 May, 2007. The
conference was attended by both BHC Project Officers, Wanda Copeland and Helen
McNeair. The focus for this conference was on Capacity Building and Sustainability.
The first day of the conference enabled us to network with other projects and this gave us a
good idea of what type of projects were sustainable within the communities and ideas on
new projects that we could develop in Shark Bay. We were able to identify new projects
such as a community garden and a men’s group and also had some discussion on how to
engage with all sectors of the community.

ORDINARY COUNCIL AGENDA - 30 MAY 2007 Page 118
The second day was focussed on Sustainability with regional workshops to discuss what we
are doing in our projects to build sustainable outcomes and what are the key sustainability
challenges in our projects and what will we do about these when we get back to our
community.
The following issues were identified with our project and we undertook to address these on
our return.
Community Engagement - Our projects are all based in Denham and there is a need to try
again to engage with Monkey Mia, Useless Loop and the pastoralists. The best strategy
would be to arrange an inter regional sporting competition on a rotation basis to get some
interaction within the Shire of Shark Bay.
Sustainability - There is a need to get more support and to provide training for projects that
are ongoing to ensure that participants are able to take over projects at the end of the BHC
timeframe. This could include coaching clinics and governance training.
New projects - An area which has not yet been successful is men’s health and although
this has been attempted, we will need to look a different approach to ensure that this
important issue can be addressed. There was a heavy focus on men’s health at the
conference with speaker, Bernard Denner, and he indicated that he would be happy to
assist us in developing this project. The project would be a men’s health promotional night
as well as forming a “men’s shed”, possibly using the area at the side of the gym as a
meeting place. A community garden would also enhance the operations of the gym and the
men’s group and the area at the side of the gym would be a good location, making use of
the tank that has been cut down.
Conclusion
Overall, the conference was very beneficial as it enabled us to network with other BHC
projects and to identify which areas of our Project Plan we need to focus on before our term
ends in 2008.
Date of Report 21 May 2007
26.8 OTHER SPECIFIC INFORMATION ITEMS
The following items are included for the information of Councillors. As they are significant
matters, copies are forwarded with this agenda.
• Action Sheet 2 May 2007 Meeting