to other excavation data in an Access-databa<strong>se</strong>, which makes it is possible to put multidimensional queries to the data that immediately can be displayed graphically on the screen. Such a procedure does not show any clear indications that corporeal aspects <strong>of</strong> the dead bodies were accentuated in the burials (ba<strong>se</strong>d on Nilsson Stutz osteological evaluations). Neither are there any clear patterns between different grave constructions nor in the distribution <strong>of</strong> grave interments such as ochre, axes, tools, amber etc. But a clo<strong>se</strong>r look at the practices behind the burials does reveal some interesting patterns that may hint at a rough horizontal stratigraphy. Towards a Horizontal Stratigraphy In recent years there have been <strong>se</strong>veral attempts made to relate and <strong>se</strong>riali<strong>se</strong> the burials at Skateholm (e.g., Strassburg 2000:256, Roth Niemi 2001:76), but unfortunately most <strong>of</strong> them are ba<strong>se</strong>d on dubious determinations <strong>of</strong> <strong>se</strong>x and vague hereditary morphological traits (<strong>se</strong>e Bäcklund 2005:22, Bäcklund Blank & Fahlander 2006). Despite the apparent ‘normality’ <strong>of</strong> the graves, there are nonetheless a few general patterns among the graves that could hint at a general development <strong>of</strong> the site. Most significant are a few categories <strong>of</strong> graves that stick out from the rest and which appear to be asynchronous patterns. For instance, all ‘double-burials’ with more than one adult are found in the south-western part <strong>of</strong> Skateholm I (nos. 6, 14, 41, 4, 47, 62, 63). Adjacent to construction 10 we also find most <strong>of</strong> the postdepositional manipulated burials (nos. 4, 7 & 28, including grave 13 which contained an individual which was cut up before burial). Another interesting category are the five occurrences <strong>of</strong> inter<strong>se</strong>cting burials (e.g., 1/2, 34/35, 40/41, 46/47, and 56/57). <strong>The</strong> most striking spatial pattern, however, is the apparent clo<strong>se</strong> relationship between individually buried dogs and children under the age <strong>of</strong> eight. On the southernmost part <strong>of</strong> Skateholm I there is a cluster <strong>of</strong> dogs buried together with two young children (nos. 9, 10, 15, 17, 18 and 65). <strong>The</strong> other dog- and children’s graves are situated in the western (42 & 62) and eastern (19 & 23) edges <strong>of</strong> the main activity area. Although such graves <strong>se</strong>em to be lacking in the north, it is apparent that dogs and children are purpo<strong>se</strong>ly buried at the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the site (fig. 4). A similar pattern is also found at Skateholm II, but here the dogs are buried at the eastern (XIX) and western (XXI) edges <strong>of</strong> the cluster and the children in the north (XII) and the south (XIII). It is indeed a striking pattern that needs to be examined in greater detail. On the Fringes: Dogs and Children Graves <strong>of</strong> individually buried dogs are not that uncommon in prehistory, there are even sites containing over a thousand buried dogs (Evans & Welinder 1997, Morey 2006, Trømborg 2006). Larsson (1990a, 1994:568) has suggested that the buried dogs may have been substitutions for human bodies lost at <strong>se</strong>a. Strassburg reasons in similar lines but suggests that the dogs symboli<strong>se</strong> shape-shifters or shamans (2000:161, 213f). Also the idea <strong>of</strong> symbolic watchdogs has been rai<strong>se</strong>d. Munt & Meiklejohn (2007:167) suggest that the extreme southern position <strong>of</strong> the dogs at Skateholm I is intentional as a ‘real or symbolic protection to the encampment’. <strong>The</strong>y <strong>se</strong>em to take for granted that any dangers would only come from the <strong>se</strong>a and not from land, an assumption they never elaborate upon. It has been fashionable in recent decades to favour ritual and ‘mysterious’ interpretations <strong>of</strong> archaeological data. In this ca<strong>se</strong>, the dogs <strong>of</strong> Skateholm make no exception. Contrary to the somewhat silly trend <strong>of</strong> ritualising the past, we could, however, argue that dogs simply were dear members <strong>of</strong> the hou<strong>se</strong>hold and buried as such when they died (cf. Morey 2006). <strong>The</strong> liminal treatment <strong>of</strong> dogs can then be explained by their low status as individuals; they are buried when they die, but only at the outskirts <strong>of</strong> the main burial area. <strong>The</strong> same reasoning may also apply for the similar placement <strong>of</strong> the children’s burials. Generally, burials <strong>of</strong> small children are rarely as elaborated as the graves <strong>of</strong> adults and the bodies <strong>of</strong> dead children are <strong>of</strong>ten handled differently from the adult in most prehistoric time periods and areas (Baxter 2005, Fahlander 2008). Such <strong>se</strong>emingly subaltern status <strong>of</strong> dead children is <strong>of</strong>ten associated with an ambiguous identity in life. Indeed, the young child is in a social <strong>se</strong>n<strong>se</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten displaced, or lost, somewhere in between a ‘proper’ gender, <strong>se</strong>x, identity, citizenship, wild-domestic, animalhuman etc. This, however, does not necessarily mean that children cannot have high social status or importance <strong>of</strong> their own. It is probably true, that children and juveniles <strong>se</strong>ldom are the great producers, leaders or innovators in prehistoric societies. <strong>The</strong>y way they are treated in death, and their social position in life, can nonetheless be very helpful when exploring the life <strong>of</strong> the adult world. Consider a grave where a newborn child is buried with a large harpoon which it never could have been able to u<strong>se</strong> in life. Is this simply evidence for a social structure ba<strong>se</strong>d on inherited prestige (cf. Strassburg 2000:200)? It could, <strong>of</strong> cour<strong>se</strong>, also simply repre<strong>se</strong>nt a burial gift <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the participating adults with little or no relation to the dead child. Here the dog burials may help us with an answer. <strong>The</strong> dogs at Skateholm have been buried with the same kind <strong>of</strong> artefacts as the humans (e.g., red ochre, flint tools or red deer antler). Nota bene, some <strong>of</strong> the<strong>se</strong> interments were actual tools and one <strong>of</strong> the ‘richest’ graves at Skateholm (XXI) is actually given to one <strong>of</strong> the dogs (Larsson 1988b:23). <strong>The</strong> individually buried dogs make one question the suppo<strong>se</strong>d relationship between the burial interments and the buried individual/family. <strong>The</strong> most likely interpretation in this particular place must thus be that the burial interments repre<strong>se</strong>nt some sort <strong>of</strong> collective effort, either by repre<strong>se</strong>ntatives or by the whole group. 36
Fig. 4. Skateholm I (above) and Skateholm II (below): <strong>The</strong> graves with individually buried dogs (black), children under 8 years (grey), and graves containing dogs/children buried together with adults (hatched). (image constructed in ArcGIS). 37
- Page 1 and 2: The Materiality of Death Bodies, bu
- Page 3: Contents Chapter 1. The Materiality
- Page 6 and 7: Fig. 1. Pieter Bruegel, The Triumph
- Page 8 and 9: ather one has to emphasise the mate
- Page 10 and 11: dead are often regarded as unfriend
- Page 12 and 13: Fig 3. The old man Tei Tetuna by hi
- Page 14 and 15: The Materiality of Social Change: H
- Page 16 and 17: The Materiality of Eternity - The A
- Page 18 and 19: FAHLANDER, F. & OESTIGAARD, T. 2004
- Page 20 and 21: Susanne Kuechler-Fogden, Webb Keane
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 2 More than Metaphor: Appro
- Page 25 and 26: discuss death and the treatment of
- Page 27 and 28: had to deal with. This is not to sa
- Page 29 and 30: hide that could be removed to expos
- Page 31 and 32: pp111-123. Philadelphia: University
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 3 A Piece of the Mesolithic
- Page 35 and 36: The main point is that the division
- Page 37 and 38: A Piece of the Mesolithic: Skatehol
- Page 39: question we need to construct some
- Page 43 and 44: visible many years after the origin
- Page 45 and 46: Phase Area Properties Interpretatio
- Page 47 and 48: phase of one site with a contempora
- Page 49: MILNER, N. & WOODMAN, P. 2005. Meso
- Page 52 and 53: with dead people belonging to other
- Page 54 and 55: Fig. 2. Due to the extraordinaire c
- Page 56 and 57: As with all cremations in Hinduism,
- Page 58 and 59: Based on the amount of scattered bo
- Page 60 and 61: To have an ethical approach involve
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 5 From Corpse to Ancestor:
- Page 65 and 66: Figure 2. Isola Sacra, Tomb 100. Ph
- Page 67 and 68: Figure 4. Isola Sacra, Tomb 87. Pho
- Page 69 and 70: Figure 5. Isola Sacra, Tomb 56. Pho
- Page 71 and 72: Figure 6. Isola Sacra, Tomb 15. Pho
- Page 73: 69 Burials
- Page 76 and 77: through careful recording of the or
- Page 78 and 79: Figure 4: Pencraig Hill: Distributi
- Page 80 and 81: focussed on use of partial sets of
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 7 Ritual and Remembrance at
- Page 85 and 86: urial (tomba a doppio loculo tipo M
- Page 87 and 88: ‘original’ walls of the tomb. L
- Page 89 and 90: chambers cut into two earlier trenc
- Page 91:
Madison: Prehistory Press, Monograp
- Page 94 and 95:
Well-organized cemeteries or messy
- Page 96 and 97:
influenced who was buried inside th
- Page 98 and 99:
it was quite short, which could ind
- Page 100 and 101:
References ARTELIUS, TORE 2004. Min
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 9 Life and Death in the Bro
- Page 105 and 106:
Fig. 5.1. Cremation necropolis at P
- Page 107 and 108:
place. These burials were very simp
- Page 109 and 110:
Chapter 10 Norwegian Face-Urns: Loc
- Page 111 and 112:
The recurring themes in the debate
- Page 113 and 114:
The local context of the Norwegian
- Page 115 and 116:
Death is the inevitable conclusion
- Page 117 and 118:
OESTIGAARD, T. 1999. Cremations as
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 11 The Use of Ochre in Ston
- Page 121 and 122:
Ochre was used so intensively that
- Page 123 and 124:
Fig. 5. Zvejnieki burial ground. Th
- Page 125 and 126:
grave has been dated to 5690±45 BP
- Page 127 and 128:
Khanty of northern Siberia, the col
- Page 129 and 130:
125 Beliefs
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 12 ”Death Myths”: Perfo
- Page 133 and 134:
Variation within the same cist Bø,
- Page 135 and 136:
Variation within the same mound Lyd
- Page 137 and 138:
Figures 6 and 7. Modvo, Luster muni
- Page 139 and 140:
To what extent there have been corr
- Page 141 and 142:
when they die, a probable explanati
- Page 143 and 144:
fragmented spindles, iron weaving s
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 13 Reproduction and Relocat
- Page 147 and 148:
may be questioned, and analysed mor
- Page 149 and 150:
References Andersson, G. 1997: A st
- Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 14 A Road for the Viking’
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure 2. The Jarlabanke Bridge tha
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 15 A Road to the Other Side
- Page 157 and 158:
Fig. 4. Clearing the bridge on an e
- Page 159 and 160:
Chapter 16 Stones and Bones: The My
- Page 161 and 162:
Fig. 4. An Iron Age scene at Sylta
- Page 163 and 164:
Fig. 7. The resemblance between cru