Figure 4: Pencraig Hill: Distribution <strong>of</strong> Cremated Bone on Pyre Fig. 5: Dunure Road: Cemetery Pha<strong>se</strong> 1 and Table <strong>of</strong> Cremation Weights. 74
Wider Traditions By the late fourth millennium BC, ceremonial sites such as Pencraig Hill were no longer u<strong>se</strong>d in the same manner: the timber components having been burnt down and / or <strong>se</strong>aled beneath cairns or mounds (Kinnes 1991; Scott 1992). <strong>The</strong> tradition <strong>of</strong> transformation, manipulation and deposition <strong>of</strong> fragmentary and partial bodies and body parts clearly continues, however, into the first half <strong>of</strong> the third millennium BC. For example, at the post-defined enclosure <strong>of</strong> Meldon Bridge (Speak & Burgess 1999, 26), a large pit surrounded by six stakes, dated to 2900-2100 BC, had held successive posts, a stake and an upright stone; the partial cremated remains <strong>of</strong> an eight year old child had been scattered in it. In another ca<strong>se</strong>, <strong>se</strong>lected cremated human bone was put into a pit that was <strong>se</strong>t in a circle <strong>of</strong> 11 stakes. Such traditions were not limited to the interior <strong>of</strong> such ceremonial enclosures. At Pencraig Wood, people had deposited small quantities <strong>of</strong> burnt human bone in pits during the third quarter <strong>of</strong> the third millennium BC (MacGregor & Stuart forthcoming). <strong>The</strong> <strong>se</strong>cond half <strong>of</strong> the third millennium BC is traditionally <strong>se</strong>en to mark an apparent shift in practices with an increasing preference for cist inhumations. <strong>The</strong><strong>se</strong> are typically repre<strong>se</strong>nted by the classic ‘Beaker Burial’ where anatomically correct crouched inhumations <strong>of</strong> individuals in cists, a form <strong>of</strong> practice which has dominated many <strong>of</strong> the models <strong>of</strong> the period. <strong>The</strong><strong>se</strong> traditions are characteri<strong>se</strong>d by inhumation <strong>of</strong> intact bodies, a focus which has led to social models and experimental practice that stress the ideological role <strong>of</strong> individualisation in mortuary and funerary rites (cf Thomas 1999) in all funerary practices across the period. However, increasing evidence for a wider range <strong>of</strong> mortuary and funerary practices during the period from Scotland, clearly indicates such models simplify the nature and inter-relationships <strong>of</strong> a suite <strong>of</strong> contemporary practices, and that u<strong>se</strong> <strong>of</strong> fragmentary and partial body parts continues to be clearly ob<strong>se</strong>rvable in the archaeological record. More complex deposits <strong>of</strong> human bone from this period, include multiple inhumations (e.g. Stevenson 1940; Dalland 1991), inhumations with moved and removed body parts (Ritchie 1958; Clo<strong>se</strong>-Brooks 1979; Parker Pearson et al 2005), partial cremations (e.g. Jobey 1980), cremated bone associated with inhumation (e.g. Clarke and Hamilton 1999) and similar variations can be witnes<strong>se</strong>d with the tradition generally characteri<strong>se</strong>d by articulated crouched inhumations <strong>of</strong> individuals in cists associated with Food Ves<strong>se</strong>ls (Sheridan 2004). Such variations are perhaps encapsulated most clearly at Linlithgow. Here a cist had deposits <strong>of</strong> partial, disarticulated and mixed, unburnt and burnt bones <strong>of</strong> at least one adult, possibly male, four children aged about nine years and one child aged about five years which were deposited at the end <strong>of</strong> the third millennium BC (Cook 2000). At Sand Fjold, Orkney a similar succession <strong>of</strong> disarticulated unburnt bones and cremated bone were deposited in a single cist from the early third millennium BC to the early first millennium BC (Dalland 1999), potentially reinforcing the more widespread nature <strong>of</strong> such traditions in Scotland. Exploring this hypothesis further, additional evidence worthy <strong>of</strong> consideration can perhaps be <strong>se</strong>en in the recently excavated cist cemetery at Dunure Road, Ayrshire, This late third millennium cremation ceremony (Fig. 5), typical <strong>of</strong> sites which mark an apparent shift in practice at the beginning <strong>of</strong> late third millennium BC, (Sheridan 2007), produced evidence which indicates that cremation as<strong>se</strong>mblage weights are up to 40 % less than would be expected for the numbers <strong>of</strong> individuals repre<strong>se</strong>nted within the as<strong>se</strong>mblages (Fig 5) (Duffy forthcoming). This pattern has commonly been recorded el<strong>se</strong>where, but is generally attributed to <strong>se</strong>lective collection from the pyre (McKinlay 2006), or more recently to the complete combustion and/or natural scattering (i.e. by wind action etc) <strong>of</strong> the hard tissue. (A. Sheridan, pers. comm.). Again, however, such explanations rest on an implicit assumption that complete individuals are being cremated. Yet the scarcity <strong>of</strong> excavated pyre sites, or evidence for alternative arenas <strong>of</strong> disposal for the ‘outstanding’ portions <strong>of</strong> such cremations significantly fails to balance this taphonomic equation. We would suggest instead that this evidence can potentially be <strong>se</strong>en to illustrate a <strong>se</strong>lective, if not discriminatory, attitude towards deposition <strong>of</strong> cremated human bone, in which, as before, parts rather than the whole are stres<strong>se</strong>d. It may be that alternative, archaeologically invisible forums <strong>of</strong> disposal explain the ab<strong>se</strong>nce <strong>of</strong> this missing material (Bruck 2006; McKinlay 2006). More critically, current evidence fails to support the generally held view that this <strong>se</strong>lection is exclusively a post cremation occurrence. What is salient in light <strong>of</strong> our hypothesis is that such methods and arenas <strong>of</strong> burial practice repre<strong>se</strong>nt a visible continuation <strong>of</strong> a tradition involving the conscious <strong>se</strong>lection and disposal <strong>of</strong> partial and fragmentary <strong>se</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> human remains, <strong>se</strong>lections which have been demonstrated to occur el<strong>se</strong>where prior to disposal. As cremation rites develop into the mid Bronze Age this phenomenon potentially becomes increasingly visible. In the later <strong>se</strong>cond millennium features at Dunure Road, for example, collections <strong>of</strong> partial <strong>se</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> human remains (exclusively skull and long bone) occurred within an isolated pit, in front <strong>of</strong> a standing stone, and within the fill <strong>of</strong> the pit for the standing stone (Duffy forthcoming). Such patterning is reflected in contemporary examples from el<strong>se</strong>where, such as Park <strong>of</strong> Tongland, Dumfries and Galloway (Rus<strong>se</strong>ll-White et al. 1992). Such deposits appear to become more visibly <strong>se</strong>lective, <strong>of</strong>ten consisting almost entirely <strong>of</strong> skull and long bone elements, an as<strong>se</strong>mblage characteristic reminiscent <strong>of</strong> the contents <strong>of</strong> chambered cairns from some two millennia earlier. Again, this <strong>se</strong>lection is uncritically assumed to occur post-cremation, but we would suggest that, on the basis <strong>of</strong> pre<strong>se</strong>nt evidence, a continuing structuring principle 75
- Page 1 and 2:
The Materiality of Death Bodies, bu
- Page 3:
Contents Chapter 1. The Materiality
- Page 6 and 7:
Fig. 1. Pieter Bruegel, The Triumph
- Page 8 and 9:
ather one has to emphasise the mate
- Page 10 and 11:
dead are often regarded as unfriend
- Page 12 and 13:
Fig 3. The old man Tei Tetuna by hi
- Page 14 and 15:
The Materiality of Social Change: H
- Page 16 and 17:
The Materiality of Eternity - The A
- Page 18 and 19:
FAHLANDER, F. & OESTIGAARD, T. 2004
- Page 20 and 21:
Susanne Kuechler-Fogden, Webb Keane
- Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 2 More than Metaphor: Appro
- Page 25 and 26:
discuss death and the treatment of
- Page 27 and 28: had to deal with. This is not to sa
- Page 29 and 30: hide that could be removed to expos
- Page 31 and 32: pp111-123. Philadelphia: University
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 3 A Piece of the Mesolithic
- Page 35 and 36: The main point is that the division
- Page 37 and 38: A Piece of the Mesolithic: Skatehol
- Page 39 and 40: question we need to construct some
- Page 41 and 42: Fig. 4. Skateholm I (above) and Ska
- Page 43 and 44: visible many years after the origin
- Page 45 and 46: Phase Area Properties Interpretatio
- Page 47 and 48: phase of one site with a contempora
- Page 49: MILNER, N. & WOODMAN, P. 2005. Meso
- Page 52 and 53: with dead people belonging to other
- Page 54 and 55: Fig. 2. Due to the extraordinaire c
- Page 56 and 57: As with all cremations in Hinduism,
- Page 58 and 59: Based on the amount of scattered bo
- Page 60 and 61: To have an ethical approach involve
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 5 From Corpse to Ancestor:
- Page 65 and 66: Figure 2. Isola Sacra, Tomb 100. Ph
- Page 67 and 68: Figure 4. Isola Sacra, Tomb 87. Pho
- Page 69 and 70: Figure 5. Isola Sacra, Tomb 56. Pho
- Page 71 and 72: Figure 6. Isola Sacra, Tomb 15. Pho
- Page 73: 69 Burials
- Page 76 and 77: through careful recording of the or
- Page 80 and 81: focussed on use of partial sets of
- Page 83 and 84: Chapter 7 Ritual and Remembrance at
- Page 85 and 86: urial (tomba a doppio loculo tipo M
- Page 87 and 88: ‘original’ walls of the tomb. L
- Page 89 and 90: chambers cut into two earlier trenc
- Page 91: Madison: Prehistory Press, Monograp
- Page 94 and 95: Well-organized cemeteries or messy
- Page 96 and 97: influenced who was buried inside th
- Page 98 and 99: it was quite short, which could ind
- Page 100 and 101: References ARTELIUS, TORE 2004. Min
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 9 Life and Death in the Bro
- Page 105 and 106: Fig. 5.1. Cremation necropolis at P
- Page 107 and 108: place. These burials were very simp
- Page 109 and 110: Chapter 10 Norwegian Face-Urns: Loc
- Page 111 and 112: The recurring themes in the debate
- Page 113 and 114: The local context of the Norwegian
- Page 115 and 116: Death is the inevitable conclusion
- Page 117 and 118: OESTIGAARD, T. 1999. Cremations as
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 11 The Use of Ochre in Ston
- Page 121 and 122: Ochre was used so intensively that
- Page 123 and 124: Fig. 5. Zvejnieki burial ground. Th
- Page 125 and 126: grave has been dated to 5690±45 BP
- Page 127 and 128: Khanty of northern Siberia, the col
- Page 129 and 130:
125 Beliefs
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 12 ”Death Myths”: Perfo
- Page 133 and 134:
Variation within the same cist Bø,
- Page 135 and 136:
Variation within the same mound Lyd
- Page 137 and 138:
Figures 6 and 7. Modvo, Luster muni
- Page 139 and 140:
To what extent there have been corr
- Page 141 and 142:
when they die, a probable explanati
- Page 143 and 144:
fragmented spindles, iron weaving s
- Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 13 Reproduction and Relocat
- Page 147 and 148:
may be questioned, and analysed mor
- Page 149 and 150:
References Andersson, G. 1997: A st
- Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 14 A Road for the Viking’
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure 2. The Jarlabanke Bridge tha
- Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 15 A Road to the Other Side
- Page 157 and 158:
Fig. 4. Clearing the bridge on an e
- Page 159 and 160:
Chapter 16 Stones and Bones: The My
- Page 161 and 162:
Fig. 4. An Iron Age scene at Sylta
- Page 163 and 164:
Fig. 7. The resemblance between cru