25.04.2015 Views

Part 1 - Palmerston North City Council

Part 1 - Palmerston North City Council

Part 1 - Palmerston North City Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

gemconsulting<br />

"Any activity otherwise governed by, but does not comply with one or more of the performance<br />

conditions of BRL Rule 9 is a Discretionary Activity in accordance with BRL Rule 10 and a resource<br />

consent is required".<br />

Given that 'excavation or disturbance of a river bed' is governed under Rule 9, it follows that it would be<br />

addressed under Rule 10 if a performance condition was not met, as is the case with this proposal.<br />

Furthermore, the introduction to Rules 16 and 17, which provide for the excavation of the bed that does<br />

not remove material, states that excavation or other bed disturbance associated with structures associated<br />

with damming or diverting are provided for under Rule 10, among others.<br />

It is considered that Rule 10 of the BRL Plan is the appropriate rule to apply to the proposal giving it a<br />

discretionary activity status.<br />

5.1.2 Proposed One Plan<br />

The proposed One Plan is a combined regional policy statement and regional plan. The decisions on<br />

submissions to the proposed One Plan were publicly released on 24 August 2010 but many were<br />

subsequently appealed. Appeals have not yet been heard and at this stage the plan is not operative and its<br />

provisions cannot be afforded full weight.<br />

Chapter 16 of the proposed One Plan provides for activities in the beds of rivers and lakes. Specifically, Rule<br />

16‐13 provides for activities undertaken by or on behalf of the Regional <strong>Council</strong> in rivers with a 'Schedule AB<br />

Value of Flood Control and Drainage', as a permitted activity. The Manawatu River has this 'Flood Control<br />

and Drainage Value' assigned to it between the Coastal Marine Area boundary and the confluence with the<br />

Pohangina River, therefore Rule 16‐13 is applicable to this proposal. Rule 16‐13 provides for the following<br />

activities:<br />

a. The erection, placement, or extension of any structure in, on, under or over the bed of a river pursuant<br />

to s13(1) RMA<br />

b. The excavation, drilling, tunnelling or other disturbance (including gravel extraction) of the bed of a<br />

river pursuant to s13(1) RMA<br />

c. Any damming or diversion of water pursuant to s14(2) RMA<br />

d. Any discharge or deposition of plants, removed bed material, rock, shingle, earth, cleanfill material,<br />

water or sediment into water or onto or into land pursuant to ss13(1), 15(1) or 15(2A) RMA<br />

e. The damage, destruction, disturbance or removal of plants or parts of plants pursuant to s13(2) RMA.<br />

These activities are considered to be Permitted Activities provided that the activity is undertaken in<br />

accordance with the following listed sections of the Environmental Code of Practice for River Works<br />

(MWRC, June 2010) and does not involve an activity prohibited under Rule 16‐1 or an activity regulated<br />

under Rule 16‐4 (except that the activities may be carried out in specified Sites of Significance ‐ Aquatic and<br />

Sites of Significance ‐ Cultural).<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

The Generic Standards in section 2.4.2 of <strong>Part</strong> One Generic Standards for Good Practice<br />

The description of each Activity and the associated Standards for Good Practice in <strong>Part</strong> Two (for the<br />

avoidance of doubt, excluding the discussion of the Resource Management Act and potential beneficial<br />

and adverse effects)<br />

Generic Special Standards and the Site Specific Special Standards in <strong>Part</strong> Three (for the avoidance of<br />

doubt, excluding Scheme maps and Scheme dams and locations)<br />

<strong>Part</strong> Seven Definition of Terms, insofar as those defined terms must not be used other than in relation<br />

to interpreting the Environmental Code of Practice for River Works.<br />

The proposed works, in particular the diversion of water, fail to comply with all of the <strong>Part</strong> Two standards of<br />

the Environmental Code of Practice, particularly those specific to gravel management including channel<br />

realignment and diversions. The proposed works will not meet Condition 5 relating to gravel movement on<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!