Part 1 - Palmerston North City Council
Part 1 - Palmerston North City Council
Part 1 - Palmerston North City Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
gemconsulting<br />
maximum of 60,000m 3 . The gravel for the project will be sourced from the beach located adjacent to the<br />
site where it has been calculated that 200,000m 3 is available.<br />
Policy 2(i) is not relevant to this proposal.<br />
Policy 3<br />
The Lower Manawatu River or ANZAC Park Cliffs are not identified in the Regional Policy Statement as an<br />
outstanding or regionally significant feature.<br />
Policy 4<br />
This policy relates to the management of fluvial gravel extraction and is of limited relevance to the proposal<br />
as no gravel extraction is proposed. However, it is recognised that the gravel will be moved and locked in<br />
place by the works, and that it will no longer be available to natural movement processes. The policy aims<br />
to ensure that gravel extraction does not exceed the natural rates of replenishment, except where the<br />
extraction is necessary to decrease the risk of flooding or damage to essential structures. As stated above<br />
the Lower Manawatu River the maximum volume available for extraction is set at 60,000m 3 per year.<br />
Calculations show that the proposed works will require approximately 115,000m 3 of gravel to be placed<br />
behind the rock lining to provide support.<br />
It is intended to take this gravel from the adjacent beach where there is approximately 200,000m 3 available.<br />
The beach was previously a well‐used gravel extraction area with abstraction ceasing with the granting of a<br />
global resource consent to the MWRC. Since then aggradation of river gravels has been observed at the<br />
beach and as such it is anticipated that the beach will reform overtime. In addition the works are required<br />
to decrease the risk of damage to essential structures such as the existing <strong>City</strong> stopbanks.<br />
Policy 5<br />
This policy aims to provide for structures and activities to mitigate the adverse effects of flood hazard. One<br />
of the reasons for the proposed works is to provide long term protection for the flood protection structures<br />
currently protecting <strong>Palmerston</strong> <strong>North</strong> <strong>City</strong> from floods.<br />
Policy 6<br />
Policy 6 requires recognition and provision for the relationship of tangata whenua, their culture and<br />
traditions with their ancestral lands, water, sites of waahi tapu and other taonga in the beds of rivers and<br />
lakes.<br />
Te Motu o Poutoa is a site of significance to Maori and is located just downstream of the subject site. It is<br />
possible that taonga, artefacts, or remains are located in the general locality of the subject site. It is<br />
considered unlikely that any such taonga, artefacts or remains will be discovered in the excavation sites due<br />
to it being within the active bed of the river.<br />
Rangitane, represented by Tanenuiarangi Manawatu Incorporated, have been involved in the preparation<br />
of an accidental discovery protocol in relation to the works proposed by the MWRC and PMB Landco Ltd.<br />
This will ensure that an appropriate and acceptable process is followed in the event that a discovery is<br />
made during the works.<br />
Policy 7<br />
This policy allows the Regional <strong>Council</strong> to use financial contributions as a condition of resource consent for<br />
mitigating or offsetting adverse effects arising as a consequence of an activity. Such financial contributions<br />
can be used for maintaining, restoring or enhancing flood protection or erosion control works, and/or<br />
maintaining or enhancing public access to and along the margins of rivers and lakes.<br />
In this instance the proposal is to construct and maintain new flood protection and erosion control works.<br />
As a consequence of the proposal an opportunity is available to the PNCC to use the top of the rock lining to<br />
create a public access along the left bank of the river. Therefore it is considered unnecessary to impose<br />
further financial contributions on the applicant.<br />
28